Tax Avoidance Transactions, 7205-7209 [E9-3069]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 29 / Friday, February 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through
the FAA’s Web page at https://
www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/
air_traffic/publications/airspace_
amendments/.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received, and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office (see the
ADDRESSES section for the address and
phone number) between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. An informal docket
may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest
Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic
Organization, Western Service Center,
Operations Support Group, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057.
Persons interested in being placed on
a mailing list for future NPRMs should
contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking,
(202) 267–9677, for a copy of Advisory
Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which
describes the application procedure.
when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1,
Section 106, describes the authority for
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103.
Under that section, the FAA is
charged with prescribing regulations to
assign the use of the airspace necessary
to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority as
it establishes additional controlled
airspace at Red Reflet Ranch Airport,
Ten Sleep, WY.
The Proposal
The FAA is proposing an amendment
to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR) part 71 by establishing Class E
airspace at Red Reflet Ranch Airport,
Ten Sleep, WY. Controlled airspace is
necessary to accommodate aircraft using
the new RNAV (GPS) SIAP at Red Reflet
Ranch Airport, Ten Sleep, WY. This
action would enhance the safety and
management of aircraft operations at
Red Reflet Ranch Airport, Ten Sleep,
WY.
Class E airspace designations are
published in paragraph 6005 of FAA
Order 7400.9S, signed October 3, 2008,
and effective October 31, 2008, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class F airspace designation
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in this Order.
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation; (1)
Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this proposed rule,
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:39 Feb 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of the FAA Order 7400.9S,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, signed October 3, 2008, and
effective October 31, 2008 is amended
as follows:
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
*
*
*
*
*
ANM WY, E5 Ten Sleep, WY [New]
Ten Sleep, Red Reflet Ranch Airport, WY
(Lat. 43°58′04″ N., long. 107°22′46″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.6 mile
radius of the Red Reflet Ranch Airport, and
within 4 miles each side of the Red Reflet
Ranch Airport 293° bearing extending from
the 6.6-mile radius to 12 miles northwest of
the Red Reflet Ranch Airport.
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00012
*
Fmt 4702
*
Sfmt 4702
7205
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on
January 14, 2009.
H. Steve Karnes,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. E9–3076 Filed 2–12–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[REG–138326–07]
RIN 1545–BH22
Tax Avoidance Transactions
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and notice of public hearing.
SUMMARY: This document contains
proposed regulations under section
6231 of the Internal Revenue Code that
allow the IRS to convert partnership
items to nonpartnership items when the
application of the unified partnership
audit and litigation procedures of
sections 6221 through 6234 (TEFRA
partnership procedures) with respect to
certain tax avoidance transactions
interferes with the effective and efficient
enforcement of the internal revenue
laws. The regulations affect taxpayers
who have engaged in a listed transaction
through an entity subject to the TEFRA
partnership procedures. This document
also provides notice of a public hearing
on these proposed regulations.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
must be received by May 14, 2009.
Outlines of topics to be discussed at the
public hearing scheduled for June 4,
2009, at 10 a.m. must be received by
May 15, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–138326–07), room
5205, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington,
DC 20044. Submissions may be hand
delivered Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–138326–07),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20224, or sent
electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov (IRS REG–138326–
07). The public hearing will be held in
the Auditorium, Internal Revenue
Service Building, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
7206
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 29 / Friday, February 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Robert T. Wearing at (202) 622–4570;
concerning submissions of comments,
the hearing, or to be placed on the
building access list to attend the
hearing,
Richard.A.Hurst@irscounsel.treas.gov of
the Publications and Regulations Branch
at (202) 622–7180 (not toll-free
numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Background
This document contains proposed
amendments to the Procedure and
Administration Regulations (26 CFR
Part 301) under section 6231(c) of the
Internal Revenue Code. Section 402 of
the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility
Act of 1982, Public Law 97–248 (96 Stat.
324) added sections 6221 through 6231
to the Internal Revenue Code to provide
unified audit and litigation procedures
for determining the tax treatment of
partnership items at the partnership
level rather than at the partner level.
Sections 6233 and 6234 were
subsequently added by section 714(p)(1)
of the Tax Reform Act of 1984, Public
Law 98–369 (98 Stat. 494) and section
1231(a) of the Taxpayer Relief Act of
1997, Public Law 105–34 (11 Stat. 788),
respectively.
Ordinarily, under the TEFRA
partnership procedures, the IRS must
adjust a partner’s treatment of
partnership items only through
partnership-level proceedings. There are
several exceptions that allow
adjustments to be made through partnerlevel proceedings. The small
partnership exception set forth in
section 6231(a)(1)(B) provides that
partnerships having ten or fewer
partners, each of whom is an individual,
a C corporation, or an estate, are not
subject to the TEFRA partnership
procedures. Section 6231(b) provides
that items cease to be partnership items
subject to the TEFRA partnership
procedures in several different
situations. Section 6231(c) allows the
Treasury Department and the IRS to
determine and provide by regulations
that treating items as partnership items
in areas that present special
enforcement considerations will
interfere with the effective and efficient
enforcement of the internal revenue
laws and that, consequently, the items
shall be treated as nonpartnership items.
Section 6231(c) also allows the Treasury
Department and the IRS to prescribe by
regulations rules necessary to achieve
the purposes of the TEFRA partnership
procedures with respect to special
enforcement areas. Section 6231(c) lists
several specific special enforcement
areas, including criminal investigations
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:39 Feb 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
and indirect methods of proof of
income, and provides that the Treasury
Department and the IRS may determine
others. The Treasury Department and
the IRS previously have determined and
provided by regulations that
bankruptcy, receivership, and prompt
assessment requests interfere with the
effective and efficient enforcement of
the internal revenue laws and
designated them as special enforcement
areas. See §§ 301.6231(c)–7 and –8 of
the Procedure and Administration
Regulations.
Explanation of Provisions
One of the principal purposes behind
the enactment of the TEFRA partnership
procedures was to provide for the more
efficient use of the IRS’s resources by
reducing multiple proceedings with
respect to partnership items. The
abusive tax shelters of the 1970s often
used a single partnership to generate tax
benefits for dozens, if not hundreds, of
investors. Before the enactment of the
TEFRA partnership procedures, the
partnership items of each investor were
subject to separate partner-level
proceedings. The TEFRA partnership
procedures effectively brought the
partnership item components of these
proceedings together in a single
proceeding. Unlike the tax shelters of
the 1970s, however, the recent
generation of tax avoidance transactions
often uses combinations of trusts, S
corporations, limited liability
companies, partnerships, and other
entities, many times arranged in tiers,
for the tax benefit of a single investor or
a small group of investors. The
application of the TEFRA partnership
procedures to these tax avoidance
transactions often results in multiple
proceedings that complicate the
ultimate determination of the investors’
tax liabilities and consume significant
administrative resources.
For example, in a typical transaction
described in Notice 2000–44 (2000–2 CB
255) (September 5, 2000), see
§ 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b), in which the
ultimate noneconomic loss or deduction
is taken at the partner level by a single
individual, the IRS first needs to initiate
timely partnership-level proceedings to
determine, among other things, whether
the partnership is a sham and the
amount and character of contributions
and partnership liabilities. Following
the partnership-level proceedings, the
IRS often still must issue an affected
items notice of deficiency to disallow
the noneconomic loss or deduction at
the partner level. Conducting both
entity-level and partner-level
proceedings in these cases to determine
the tax liabilities of only a single
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
individual or small group of related
persons places an unnecessary burden
on taxpayers, the IRS, and the federal
courts.
Other tax avoidance transactions use
multiple tiers of partnerships making
coordinated partnership elections for
the benefit of a single individual. Two
or more separate partnership
proceedings, as well as a partner-level
proceeding, may need to take place
before an assessment can be made
against the individual. Again,
conducting entity-level proceedings in
these and similar cases in which a
single individual or small group of
related persons control multiple entities
and receive all the tax benefits is
inefficient and imposes a significant
administrative burden.
The need to conduct partnership-level
proceedings to determine the tax
liabilities of a single individual or small
group of related persons also generates
complex and burdensome procedural
issues that do not contribute to the
determination of the individuals’ tax
liabilities. For example, the application
of the TEFRA partnership procedures
may raise complicated issues
concerning the segregation and
aggregation of partnership items,
affected items, and nonpartnership
items. Often, the TEFRA partnership
procedures make the identification and
examination of the transactions more
complicated and difficult. As a result,
the Treasury Department and the IRS
have determined that special
enforcement considerations, within the
meaning of section 6231(c)(1)(E), are
present in the case of transactions that
the Treasury Department and the IRS
have publicly identified as tax
avoidance transactions. Specifically, the
Treasury Department and the IRS have
determined that treating items related to
listed transactions within the meaning
of § 1.6011–4(b)(2) of the Income Tax
Regulations as partnership items
interferes with the effective and efficient
enforcement of the internal revenue
laws.
The proposed regulations are limited
to tax avoidance transactions that are
publicly identified by the Treasury
Department and the IRS as listed
transactions under § 1.6011–4(b)(2) of
the Income Tax Regulations. Under the
proposed regulations, the transaction
must be a listed transaction on the date
the IRS sends written notification to the
partner that the partner’s partnership
items will be treated as nonpartnership
items. Accordingly, the fact that a
transaction becomes a listed transaction
after the date on which the taxpayer
engages in the transaction does not
preclude the conversion of items under
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 29 / Friday, February 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
the proposed regulations. This
limitation promotes taxpayer awareness
of the transactions that can subject their
partnership items to removal from the
TEFRA partnership procedures. The
Treasury Department and the IRS also
have determined that the limitation will
provide for the more efficient use of the
IRS’s resources.
Under the proposed regulations, the
IRS will make determinations regarding
whether to convert partnership items to
nonpartnership items on a partnershipby-partnership and partner-by-partner
basis. Thus, if a taxpayer is a partner in
two partnerships with partnership items
related to listed transactions and a third
partnership that has no partnership
items related to listed transactions, the
IRS could convert the taxpayer’s
partnership items in either or both of
the first two partnerships but could not
convert the taxpayer’s partnership items
in the third partnership. Similarly, if a
taxpayer engages in a listed transaction
through a tier of TEFRA entities, the IRS
could convert the taxpayer’s partnership
items in any or all of the tier entities
with partnership items related to the
listed transaction.
Although, consistent with section
6231(c)(2), the Secretary has determined
that treating items related to listed
transactions as partnership items will
interfere with the effective and efficient
enforcement of the internal revenue
laws and has so provided in the
proposed regulations, the proposed
regulations further provide that the
partnership items related to listed
transactions remain subject to the
TEFRA partnership procedures unless
and until the IRS sends written
notification to the partner that the items
will be treated as nonpartnership items.
In this regard, the proposed regulations
are consistent with the rules that are
already in place with respect to sending
notices under section 301.6231(c)–5 of
the Procedure and Administration
Regulations relating to partners under
criminal investigation. See Phillips v.
Commissioner, 272 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th
Cir. 2001). Specifically, the IRS will
send written notification under the
circumstances described in the
proposed regulations using procedures
similar to the procedures used under
§ 301.6231(c)–5 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations, and will
make conforming changes to the
Internal Revenue Manual and
Delegation Order 4–19, as necessary.
If the IRS concludes that a particular
partner’s partnership items should be
treated as nonpartnership items under
the circumstances described in the
proposed regulations, the IRS will send
written notification to the partner
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:39 Feb 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
identifying each partnership for which
the partner’s partnership items will be
treated as nonpartnership items. In the
case of an indirect partner (as defined in
section 6231(a)(10)) having an interest
in a partnership through one or more
pass-thru partners (as defined in section
6231(a)(9)), the IRS may send a written
notification to the indirect partner
identifying only the lower-tier
partnership and not the pass-thru
partners. In those circumstances, the
partnership items attributable to the
lower-tier partnership that flow through
to the indirect partners will convert to
nonpartnership items of the notified
partner, even though the pass-thru
partners were not identified in the
written notification. Any partnership
items originating with the pass-thru
partners, that is, partnership items that
are not attributable to the lower-tier
partnership, will not convert to
nonpartnership items unless the IRS
identifies the pass-thru partner in the
written notification (in which case all
the partnership items directly
attributable to the pass-thru partner also
will convert to nonpartnership items of
the notified partner).
As of the date that the IRS sends
written notification of the conversion to
the partner, all of the partner’s
partnership items attributable to the
identified partnership will be treated as
nonpartnership items for all of the
identified partnership’s taxable years
that (1) ended on or before the date
written notification is sent by the IRS to
the partner and (2) for which the partner
has items attributable to that
partnership that are related to the listed
transaction. The deficiency procedures
in subchapter B of chapter 63 will
apply, pursuant to section
6230(a)(2)(A)(ii), as of the date of the
notice.
The proposed regulations incorporate
existing rules under § 301.6231(c)–3 of
the Procedure and Administration
Regulations, which provide that the
partnership items of a partnership may
not be converted if a notice of final
partnership administrative adjustment
(FPAA) with respect to those
partnership items has been mailed to
the tax matters partner of the
partnership and either (1) the period for
bringing an action with respect to the
FPAA has expired and no judicial
action has been brought or (2) the
decision of the court in an action
brought with respect to the FPAA has
become final. This rule allows the IRS
to send notification converting
partnership items to nonpartnership
items after the commencement of a
judicial proceeding related to the
converted partnership items. The
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7207
Treasury Department and the IRS
recognize, however, that it is not in the
best interest of taxpayers, the Treasury
Department, the IRS, or the courts to
unnecessarily delay conversion of
partnership items to nonpartnership
items. Consistent with its existing
practices under section 6231(c), the IRS
intends to make a decision regarding
whether to convert partnership items to
nonpartnership items before the
commencement of any judicial
proceeding, although on isolated and
unusual occasions changed
circumstances may require the IRS to
revisit that decision after the
commencement of a judicial proceeding.
In addition, judicial doctrines such as
collateral estoppel and res judicata may
preclude litigating issues in a partnerlevel proceeding that were previously
litigated in a partnership-level
proceeding prior to conversion of
partnership items to nonpartnership
items. Finally, the partnership items of
any partners to whom the IRS does not
send written notification will not
convert to nonpartnership items.
Proposed Effective Date
The regulations, when finalized, are
proposed to apply to any taxable period
ending on or after the date of
publication of these rules as proposed
regulations in the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
has also been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply
to these regulations, and, because these
regulations do not impose a collection
of information on small entities, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue
Code, this notice of proposed
rulemaking has been submitted to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment
on its impact on small business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
written (a signed original and eight (8)
copies) or electronic comments that are
submitted timely to the IRS. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on the clarity of the
proposed rules and how they can be
made easier to understand. The
Treasury Department and the IRS also
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
7208
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 29 / Friday, February 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
request comments that identify
additional transactions or activities that
present appropriate grounds for
converting partnership items to
nonpartnership items. All comments
will be made available for public
inspection and copying.
A public hearing has been scheduled
for June 4, 2009, beginning at 10 a.m. in
the Auditorium of the Internal Revenue
Service Building, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Due to
building security procedures, visitors
must enter at the Constitution Avenue
entrance. In addition, all visitors must
present photo identification to enter the
building. Because of access restrictions,
visitors will not be admitted beyond the
immediate entrance area more than 30
minutes before the hearing starts. For
information about having your name
placed on the building access list to
attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3)
apply to the hearing. Persons who wish
to present oral comments at the hearing
must submit written or electronic
comments and an outline of the topics
to be discussed and the time to be
devoted to each topic (signed original
and eight (8) copies) by May 15, 2009.
A period of 10 minutes will be allotted
to each person for making comments.
An agenda showing the scheduling of
the speakers will be prepared after the
deadline for receiving outlines has
passed. Copies of the agenda will be
available free of charge at the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Robert T. Wearing of the
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedure and Administration).
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301
Employment taxes, Estate taxes,
Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income taxes,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR Part 301 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
PART 301—PROCEDURE AND
ADMINISTRATION
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 301 is amended by adding the
entry in numerical order to read in part
as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 301.6231(c)–9 is also issued under
26 U.S.C. 6230(k) and 6231(c)(1) and (c)(3).
* * *
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:39 Feb 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
Par. 2. Section 301.6231(c)–3 is
amended by revising paragraphs (a)
introductory text and (b) to read as
follows:
§ 301.6231(c)–3 Limitation on applicability
of §§ 301.6231(c)–4 through 301.6231(c)–9.
(a) In general. A provision of
§§ 301.6231(c)–4 through 301.6231(c)–9
shall not apply with respect to
partnership items arising in a
partnership taxable year if, as of the date
on which those items would otherwise
begin to be treated as nonpartnership
items under that provision.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Effective/applicability date. The
rules of this section, when adopted as
final regulations in the Federal Register,
will apply to partner taxable years
ending on or after the date of
publication of these proposed
regulations in the Federal Register.
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 3. Section 301.6231(c)–9 is added
to read as follows:
§ 301.6231(c)–9
transactions.
Tax avoidance
(a) In general. The treatment of items
that relate to a listed transaction, as
defined in § 1.6011–4, as partnership
items will interfere with the effective
and efficient enforcement of the internal
revenue laws. Accordingly, if a partner
has partnership items that relate to a
listed transaction and are attributable to
a partnership that is identified in a
written notification described in this
paragraph, the partner’s partnership
items that are attributable to the
identified partnership shall be treated as
nonpartnership items as of the date on
which the written notification is sent by
the Internal Revenue Service to the
partner. The determination whether to
treat the partnership items of a partner
as nonpartnership items shall be made
by the Internal Revenue Service on a
partnership-by-partnership and partnerby-partner basis. The partnership items
of a partner shall not be treated as
nonpartnership items under this section
unless and until the Internal Revenue
Service sends the partner written
notification that the partner’s
partnership items attributable to the
identified partnership will be treated as
nonpartnership items. The written
notification shall identify each
partnership in which the partner holds
an interest, directly or indirectly, with
respect to which all the partner’s
partnership items will be treated as
nonpartnership items. All partnership
items of a partner that are attributable to
a partnership that is identified in a
written notification shall be treated as
nonpartnership items for all taxable
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
years of the identified partnership
ending on or before the date the Internal
Revenue Service sends written
notification to the partner in which the
partner has partnership items
attributable to the identified partnership
that relate to the listed transaction.
Partnership items of a partner that are
attributable to a partnership that is not
identified in a written notification sent
by the Internal Revenue Service to that
partner shall not be treated as
nonpartnership items of the notified
partner, except that if the notified
partner holds an interest in the
identified partnership through one or
more pass-thru partners (as defined in
section 6231(a)(9)), the partnership
items attributable to the identified
partnership that flow through the passthru partners to the indirect partners (as
defined in section 6231(a)(10)), will be
treated as nonpartnership items of the
notified partner even if the written
notification does not identify the passthru partners.
(b) Examples. The provisions of this
section may be illustrated by the
following examples:
Example 1. PS1 and PS2 are unrelated
partnerships subject to the provisions of
subchapter C, chapter 63 of the Internal
Revenue Code. A is one of the partners of
PS1 and one of the partners of PS2. PS1 and
PS2 have partnership items that relate to a
listed transaction, as defined in § 1.6011–
4(b)(2). The IRS sends written notification to
A that his partnership items in PS1 will be
treated as nonpartnership items, but the IRS
does not send written notification to A that
his partnership items in PS2 will be treated
as nonpartnership items. As a result, A’s
partnership items in PS1 are treated as
nonpartnership items as of the date that the
IRS sent written notification of the
conversion to A, and A’s partnership items
in PS2 remain as partnership items.
Example 2. PS3 and PS4 are partnerships
subject to the provisions of subchapter C,
chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue Code. B
is one of the partners of PS3 and PS3 is one
of the partners of PS4. B is an indirect
partner in PS4 within the meaning of section
6231(a)(10). Both PS3 and PS4 have
partnership items related to a listed
transaction, as defined in § 1.6011–4(b)(2).
The IRS sends written notification to B that
his partnership items in PS4 will be treated
as nonpartnership items. As a result, all of
B’s partnership items flowing from PS4 are
treated as nonpartnership items of B as of the
date that the IRS sent written notification of
the conversion to B. However, since the IRS
did not send written notification to B that his
partnership items in PS3 will be treated as
nonpartnership items, B’s partnership items
in PS3 that are not attributable to PS4 will
remain partnership items.
(c) Effective/applicability date. The
rules of this section, when adopted as
final regulations in the Federal Register,
will apply to partner taxable years
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 29 / Friday, February 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
ending on or after the date of
publication of these proposed
regulations in the Federal Register.
Dated: February 9, 2009.
Linda M. Kroening,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E9–3069 Filed 2–12–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 070718366–7372–01]
RIN 0648–AV32
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Maximum Retainable
Amounts for Non–American Fisheries
Act Trawl Catcher/Processors
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes to amend
regulations to change the time at which
the amount of retained groundfish must
be calculated to comply with the
maximum retainable amounts (MRAs) of
selected groundfish species caught by
trawl catcher/processors (C/Ps) that are
not eligible under the American
Fisheries Act (AFA) to participate in
directed fishing for pollock. This
proposed action would apply to MRAs
for yellowfin sole, rock sole, flathead
sole, ‘‘other flatfish,’’ arrowtooth
flounder, Pacific cod, and Atka
mackerel in the Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands management area (BSAI) and for
Pacific ocean perch in the Aleutian
Islands (AI). The proposed action is
necessary to provide the non–AFA trawl
C/Ps the opportunity to reduce discards
and increase retention of these
groundfish species. The proposed rule is
intended to promote the goals and
objectives of the Fishery Management
Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands Management Area
(FMP).
DATES: Written comments must be
received by March 16, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Sue
Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. You may submit
comments, identified by ‘‘RIN 0648–
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:39 Feb 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
AV32’’, by any one of the following
methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal website at
https://www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: P. O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK
99802.
• Fax: (907) 586–7557.
• Hand delivery to the Federal
Building: 709 West 9th Street, Room
420A, Juneau, AK.
All comments received are a part of
the public record and will generally be
posted to https://www.regulations.gov
without change. All Personal Identifying
Information (e.g., name, address)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in the required
fields, if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
portable document file (pdf) formats
only.
Copies of the Environmental
Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(EA/RIR/IRFA) prepared for this action
may be obtained from the mailing
address above or from the NMFS Alaska
Region website at https://
www.fakr.noaa.gov.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection–of–information
requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted to NMFS at
ADDRESSES above and by e–mail to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to
202– 395(7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Hartman, 907–586–7442, or
jeff.hartman@noaa.gov.
NMFS
manages the U.S. groundfish fisheries in
the BSAI under the FMP. The North
Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council) prepared the FMP pursuant to
the Magnuson–Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson–Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq. Regulations implementing
the FMP appear at 50 CFR part 679.
General regulations that pertain to U.S.
fisheries appear at subpart H of 50 CFR
part 600.
MRAs assist in limiting harvest of a
species within its annual total allowable
catch (TAC). Once the TAC for a species
is reached, retention of that species
becomes prohibited and all catch of that
species must be discarded. Therefore,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7209
NMFS closes a species to directed
fishing before the entire TAC is taken to
leave sufficient amounts of the TAC
available for incidental catch. A
species–specific MRA is used to manage
the amount of a species left for
incidental catch.
The MRA is the maximum weight of
a species closed to directed fishing that
may be retained onboard a vessel. MRAs
are calculated as a percentage of the
weight of catch of each species open to
directed fishing that is retained onboard
the vessel (the basis species). If the MRA
for a species is 35 percent, then the
percent of retained incidental species
must be no more than 35 percent of the
weight of basis species. For example,
the MRA for rock sole caught in a
directed fishery for yellowfin sole is 35
percent. If yellowfin sole is open to
directed fishing (a basis species) and
rock sole is closed to directed fishing, a
vessel operator may retain rock sole in
amounts up to 35 percent of the round
weight equivalent of yellowfin sole that
is onboard the vessel at any point in
time during a fishing trip. All catch of
rock sole in excess of the MRA must be
discarded. To calculate retained
amounts for rock sole and yellowfin
sole, the vessel operator would estimate
the processed weight of rock sole and
yellowfin sole for a trip, convert those
processed amounts to round weight
equivalent of retained catch, and
compare that estimate of retained catch
with the 35 percent MRA for rock sole.
MRAs are applied to all groundfish
species in the BSAI to reduce fishing
effort on specific species when catch is
approaching an annual TAC. MRAs are
the primary tool used by NMFS to
reduce or slow the catch of species
when directed fishing for that species is
closed. Directed fishing is defined in 50
CFR part 679 as ‘‘any fishing activity
that results in the retention of an
amount of a species or species group
onboard a vessel that is greater than the
MRA for that species or species group.(
Table 11 to 50 CFR part 679 provides
the list of incidental catch and basis
species and the MRA of each incidental
catch species as a percentage of each
basis species.
Current regulations at § 679.20(e)
require, with one exception, that the
MRAs apply at any time during a fishing
trip. This MRA accounting period is
known as ‘‘instantaneous,’’ because the
MRA may not be exceeded at any point
in time during the fishing trip. The
exception to this requirement,
implemented in 2004 to reduce
regulatory discards of pollock, allows
the MRA for pollock retained by non–
AFA vessels to apply at the end of each
offload rather than at any time during
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 29 (Friday, February 13, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7205-7209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-3069]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[REG-138326-07]
RIN 1545-BH22
Tax Avoidance Transactions
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations under section 6231
of the Internal Revenue Code that allow the IRS to convert partnership
items to nonpartnership items when the application of the unified
partnership audit and litigation procedures of sections 6221 through
6234 (TEFRA partnership procedures) with respect to certain tax
avoidance transactions interferes with the effective and efficient
enforcement of the internal revenue laws. The regulations affect
taxpayers who have engaged in a listed transaction through an entity
subject to the TEFRA partnership procedures. This document also
provides notice of a public hearing on these proposed regulations.
DATES: Written or electronic comments must be received by May 14, 2009.
Outlines of topics to be discussed at the public hearing scheduled for
June 4, 2009, at 10 a.m. must be received by May 15, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-138326-07), room
5205, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
138326-07), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, or sent electronically via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov (IRS REG-
138326-07). The public hearing will be held in the Auditorium, Internal
Revenue Service Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
[[Page 7206]]
Robert T. Wearing at (202) 622-4570; concerning submissions of
comments, the hearing, or to be placed on the building access list to
attend the hearing, Richard.A.Hurst@irscounsel.treas.gov of the
Publications and Regulations Branch at (202) 622-7180 (not toll-free
numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains proposed amendments to the Procedure and
Administration Regulations (26 CFR Part 301) under section 6231(c) of
the Internal Revenue Code. Section 402 of the Tax Equity and Fiscal
Responsibility Act of 1982, Public Law 97-248 (96 Stat. 324) added
sections 6221 through 6231 to the Internal Revenue Code to provide
unified audit and litigation procedures for determining the tax
treatment of partnership items at the partnership level rather than at
the partner level. Sections 6233 and 6234 were subsequently added by
section 714(p)(1) of the Tax Reform Act of 1984, Public Law 98-369 (98
Stat. 494) and section 1231(a) of the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997,
Public Law 105-34 (11 Stat. 788), respectively.
Ordinarily, under the TEFRA partnership procedures, the IRS must
adjust a partner's treatment of partnership items only through
partnership-level proceedings. There are several exceptions that allow
adjustments to be made through partner-level proceedings. The small
partnership exception set forth in section 6231(a)(1)(B) provides that
partnerships having ten or fewer partners, each of whom is an
individual, a C corporation, or an estate, are not subject to the TEFRA
partnership procedures. Section 6231(b) provides that items cease to be
partnership items subject to the TEFRA partnership procedures in
several different situations. Section 6231(c) allows the Treasury
Department and the IRS to determine and provide by regulations that
treating items as partnership items in areas that present special
enforcement considerations will interfere with the effective and
efficient enforcement of the internal revenue laws and that,
consequently, the items shall be treated as nonpartnership items.
Section 6231(c) also allows the Treasury Department and the IRS to
prescribe by regulations rules necessary to achieve the purposes of the
TEFRA partnership procedures with respect to special enforcement areas.
Section 6231(c) lists several specific special enforcement areas,
including criminal investigations and indirect methods of proof of
income, and provides that the Treasury Department and the IRS may
determine others. The Treasury Department and the IRS previously have
determined and provided by regulations that bankruptcy, receivership,
and prompt assessment requests interfere with the effective and
efficient enforcement of the internal revenue laws and designated them
as special enforcement areas. See Sec. Sec. 301.6231(c)-7 and -8 of
the Procedure and Administration Regulations.
Explanation of Provisions
One of the principal purposes behind the enactment of the TEFRA
partnership procedures was to provide for the more efficient use of the
IRS's resources by reducing multiple proceedings with respect to
partnership items. The abusive tax shelters of the 1970s often used a
single partnership to generate tax benefits for dozens, if not
hundreds, of investors. Before the enactment of the TEFRA partnership
procedures, the partnership items of each investor were subject to
separate partner-level proceedings. The TEFRA partnership procedures
effectively brought the partnership item components of these
proceedings together in a single proceeding. Unlike the tax shelters of
the 1970s, however, the recent generation of tax avoidance transactions
often uses combinations of trusts, S corporations, limited liability
companies, partnerships, and other entities, many times arranged in
tiers, for the tax benefit of a single investor or a small group of
investors. The application of the TEFRA partnership procedures to these
tax avoidance transactions often results in multiple proceedings that
complicate the ultimate determination of the investors' tax liabilities
and consume significant administrative resources.
For example, in a typical transaction described in Notice 2000-44
(2000-2 CB 255) (September 5, 2000), see Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b), in
which the ultimate noneconomic loss or deduction is taken at the
partner level by a single individual, the IRS first needs to initiate
timely partnership-level proceedings to determine, among other things,
whether the partnership is a sham and the amount and character of
contributions and partnership liabilities. Following the partnership-
level proceedings, the IRS often still must issue an affected items
notice of deficiency to disallow the noneconomic loss or deduction at
the partner level. Conducting both entity-level and partner-level
proceedings in these cases to determine the tax liabilities of only a
single individual or small group of related persons places an
unnecessary burden on taxpayers, the IRS, and the federal courts.
Other tax avoidance transactions use multiple tiers of partnerships
making coordinated partnership elections for the benefit of a single
individual. Two or more separate partnership proceedings, as well as a
partner-level proceeding, may need to take place before an assessment
can be made against the individual. Again, conducting entity-level
proceedings in these and similar cases in which a single individual or
small group of related persons control multiple entities and receive
all the tax benefits is inefficient and imposes a significant
administrative burden.
The need to conduct partnership-level proceedings to determine the
tax liabilities of a single individual or small group of related
persons also generates complex and burdensome procedural issues that do
not contribute to the determination of the individuals' tax
liabilities. For example, the application of the TEFRA partnership
procedures may raise complicated issues concerning the segregation and
aggregation of partnership items, affected items, and nonpartnership
items. Often, the TEFRA partnership procedures make the identification
and examination of the transactions more complicated and difficult. As
a result, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that
special enforcement considerations, within the meaning of section
6231(c)(1)(E), are present in the case of transactions that the
Treasury Department and the IRS have publicly identified as tax
avoidance transactions. Specifically, the Treasury Department and the
IRS have determined that treating items related to listed transactions
within the meaning of Sec. 1.6011-4(b)(2) of the Income Tax
Regulations as partnership items interferes with the effective and
efficient enforcement of the internal revenue laws.
The proposed regulations are limited to tax avoidance transactions
that are publicly identified by the Treasury Department and the IRS as
listed transactions under Sec. 1.6011-4(b)(2) of the Income Tax
Regulations. Under the proposed regulations, the transaction must be a
listed transaction on the date the IRS sends written notification to
the partner that the partner's partnership items will be treated as
nonpartnership items. Accordingly, the fact that a transaction becomes
a listed transaction after the date on which the taxpayer engages in
the transaction does not preclude the conversion of items under
[[Page 7207]]
the proposed regulations. This limitation promotes taxpayer awareness
of the transactions that can subject their partnership items to removal
from the TEFRA partnership procedures. The Treasury Department and the
IRS also have determined that the limitation will provide for the more
efficient use of the IRS's resources.
Under the proposed regulations, the IRS will make determinations
regarding whether to convert partnership items to nonpartnership items
on a partnership-by-partnership and partner-by-partner basis. Thus, if
a taxpayer is a partner in two partnerships with partnership items
related to listed transactions and a third partnership that has no
partnership items related to listed transactions, the IRS could convert
the taxpayer's partnership items in either or both of the first two
partnerships but could not convert the taxpayer's partnership items in
the third partnership. Similarly, if a taxpayer engages in a listed
transaction through a tier of TEFRA entities, the IRS could convert the
taxpayer's partnership items in any or all of the tier entities with
partnership items related to the listed transaction.
Although, consistent with section 6231(c)(2), the Secretary has
determined that treating items related to listed transactions as
partnership items will interfere with the effective and efficient
enforcement of the internal revenue laws and has so provided in the
proposed regulations, the proposed regulations further provide that the
partnership items related to listed transactions remain subject to the
TEFRA partnership procedures unless and until the IRS sends written
notification to the partner that the items will be treated as
nonpartnership items. In this regard, the proposed regulations are
consistent with the rules that are already in place with respect to
sending notices under section 301.6231(c)-5 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations relating to partners under criminal
investigation. See Phillips v. Commissioner, 272 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th
Cir. 2001). Specifically, the IRS will send written notification under
the circumstances described in the proposed regulations using
procedures similar to the procedures used under Sec. 301.6231(c)-5 of
the Procedure and Administration Regulations, and will make conforming
changes to the Internal Revenue Manual and Delegation Order 4-19, as
necessary.
If the IRS concludes that a particular partner's partnership items
should be treated as nonpartnership items under the circumstances
described in the proposed regulations, the IRS will send written
notification to the partner identifying each partnership for which the
partner's partnership items will be treated as nonpartnership items. In
the case of an indirect partner (as defined in section 6231(a)(10))
having an interest in a partnership through one or more pass-thru
partners (as defined in section 6231(a)(9)), the IRS may send a written
notification to the indirect partner identifying only the lower-tier
partnership and not the pass-thru partners. In those circumstances, the
partnership items attributable to the lower-tier partnership that flow
through to the indirect partners will convert to nonpartnership items
of the notified partner, even though the pass-thru partners were not
identified in the written notification. Any partnership items
originating with the pass-thru partners, that is, partnership items
that are not attributable to the lower-tier partnership, will not
convert to nonpartnership items unless the IRS identifies the pass-thru
partner in the written notification (in which case all the partnership
items directly attributable to the pass-thru partner also will convert
to nonpartnership items of the notified partner).
As of the date that the IRS sends written notification of the
conversion to the partner, all of the partner's partnership items
attributable to the identified partnership will be treated as
nonpartnership items for all of the identified partnership's taxable
years that (1) ended on or before the date written notification is sent
by the IRS to the partner and (2) for which the partner has items
attributable to that partnership that are related to the listed
transaction. The deficiency procedures in subchapter B of chapter 63
will apply, pursuant to section 6230(a)(2)(A)(ii), as of the date of
the notice.
The proposed regulations incorporate existing rules under Sec.
301.6231(c)-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations, which
provide that the partnership items of a partnership may not be
converted if a notice of final partnership administrative adjustment
(FPAA) with respect to those partnership items has been mailed to the
tax matters partner of the partnership and either (1) the period for
bringing an action with respect to the FPAA has expired and no judicial
action has been brought or (2) the decision of the court in an action
brought with respect to the FPAA has become final. This rule allows the
IRS to send notification converting partnership items to nonpartnership
items after the commencement of a judicial proceeding related to the
converted partnership items. The Treasury Department and the IRS
recognize, however, that it is not in the best interest of taxpayers,
the Treasury Department, the IRS, or the courts to unnecessarily delay
conversion of partnership items to nonpartnership items. Consistent
with its existing practices under section 6231(c), the IRS intends to
make a decision regarding whether to convert partnership items to
nonpartnership items before the commencement of any judicial
proceeding, although on isolated and unusual occasions changed
circumstances may require the IRS to revisit that decision after the
commencement of a judicial proceeding. In addition, judicial doctrines
such as collateral estoppel and res judicata may preclude litigating
issues in a partner-level proceeding that were previously litigated in
a partnership-level proceeding prior to conversion of partnership items
to nonpartnership items. Finally, the partnership items of any partners
to whom the IRS does not send written notification will not convert to
nonpartnership items.
Proposed Effective Date
The regulations, when finalized, are proposed to apply to any
taxable period ending on or after the date of publication of these
rules as proposed regulations in the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is
not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It has also
been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations, and, because
these regulations do not impose a collection of information on small
entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not
apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, this
notice of proposed rulemaking has been submitted to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any written (a signed original and eight
(8) copies) or electronic comments that are submitted timely to the
IRS. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on the
clarity of the proposed rules and how they can be made easier to
understand. The Treasury Department and the IRS also
[[Page 7208]]
request comments that identify additional transactions or activities
that present appropriate grounds for converting partnership items to
nonpartnership items. All comments will be made available for public
inspection and copying.
A public hearing has been scheduled for June 4, 2009, beginning at
10 a.m. in the Auditorium of the Internal Revenue Service Building,
1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Due to building security
procedures, visitors must enter at the Constitution Avenue entrance. In
addition, all visitors must present photo identification to enter the
building. Because of access restrictions, visitors will not be admitted
beyond the immediate entrance area more than 30 minutes before the
hearing starts. For information about having your name placed on the
building access list to attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3) apply to the hearing. Persons who
wish to present oral comments at the hearing must submit written or
electronic comments and an outline of the topics to be discussed and
the time to be devoted to each topic (signed original and eight (8)
copies) by May 15, 2009. A period of 10 minutes will be allotted to
each person for making comments. An agenda showing the scheduling of
the speakers will be prepared after the deadline for receiving outlines
has passed. Copies of the agenda will be available free of charge at
the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is Robert T. Wearing of
the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and
Administration).
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301
Employment taxes, Estate taxes, Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income
taxes, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR Part 301 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 301--PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 301 is amended by
adding the entry in numerical order to read in part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 301.6231(c)-9 is also issued under 26 U.S.C. 6230(k) and
6231(c)(1) and (c)(3). * * *
Par. 2. Section 301.6231(c)-3 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)
introductory text and (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 301.6231(c)-3 Limitation on applicability of Sec. Sec.
301.6231(c)-4 through 301.6231(c)-9.
(a) In general. A provision of Sec. Sec. 301.6231(c)-4 through
301.6231(c)-9 shall not apply with respect to partnership items arising
in a partnership taxable year if, as of the date on which those items
would otherwise begin to be treated as nonpartnership items under that
provision.
* * * * *
(b) Effective/applicability date. The rules of this section, when
adopted as final regulations in the Federal Register, will apply to
partner taxable years ending on or after the date of publication of
these proposed regulations in the Federal Register.
* * * * *
Par. 3. Section 301.6231(c)-9 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 301.6231(c)-9 Tax avoidance transactions.
(a) In general. The treatment of items that relate to a listed
transaction, as defined in Sec. 1.6011-4, as partnership items will
interfere with the effective and efficient enforcement of the internal
revenue laws. Accordingly, if a partner has partnership items that
relate to a listed transaction and are attributable to a partnership
that is identified in a written notification described in this
paragraph, the partner's partnership items that are attributable to the
identified partnership shall be treated as nonpartnership items as of
the date on which the written notification is sent by the Internal
Revenue Service to the partner. The determination whether to treat the
partnership items of a partner as nonpartnership items shall be made by
the Internal Revenue Service on a partnership-by-partnership and
partner-by-partner basis. The partnership items of a partner shall not
be treated as nonpartnership items under this section unless and until
the Internal Revenue Service sends the partner written notification
that the partner's partnership items attributable to the identified
partnership will be treated as nonpartnership items. The written
notification shall identify each partnership in which the partner holds
an interest, directly or indirectly, with respect to which all the
partner's partnership items will be treated as nonpartnership items.
All partnership items of a partner that are attributable to a
partnership that is identified in a written notification shall be
treated as nonpartnership items for all taxable years of the identified
partnership ending on or before the date the Internal Revenue Service
sends written notification to the partner in which the partner has
partnership items attributable to the identified partnership that
relate to the listed transaction. Partnership items of a partner that
are attributable to a partnership that is not identified in a written
notification sent by the Internal Revenue Service to that partner shall
not be treated as nonpartnership items of the notified partner, except
that if the notified partner holds an interest in the identified
partnership through one or more pass-thru partners (as defined in
section 6231(a)(9)), the partnership items attributable to the
identified partnership that flow through the pass-thru partners to the
indirect partners (as defined in section 6231(a)(10)), will be treated
as nonpartnership items of the notified partner even if the written
notification does not identify the pass-thru partners.
(b) Examples. The provisions of this section may be illustrated by
the following examples:
Example 1. PS1 and PS2 are unrelated partnerships subject to the
provisions of subchapter C, chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue Code.
A is one of the partners of PS1 and one of the partners of PS2. PS1
and PS2 have partnership items that relate to a listed transaction,
as defined in Sec. 1.6011-4(b)(2). The IRS sends written
notification to A that his partnership items in PS1 will be treated
as nonpartnership items, but the IRS does not send written
notification to A that his partnership items in PS2 will be treated
as nonpartnership items. As a result, A's partnership items in PS1
are treated as nonpartnership items as of the date that the IRS sent
written notification of the conversion to A, and A's partnership
items in PS2 remain as partnership items.
Example 2. PS3 and PS4 are partnerships subject to the
provisions of subchapter C, chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue Code.
B is one of the partners of PS3 and PS3 is one of the partners of
PS4. B is an indirect partner in PS4 within the meaning of section
6231(a)(10). Both PS3 and PS4 have partnership items related to a
listed transaction, as defined in Sec. 1.6011-4(b)(2). The IRS
sends written notification to B that his partnership items in PS4
will be treated as nonpartnership items. As a result, all of B's
partnership items flowing from PS4 are treated as nonpartnership
items of B as of the date that the IRS sent written notification of
the conversion to B. However, since the IRS did not send written
notification to B that his partnership items in PS3 will be treated
as nonpartnership items, B's partnership items in PS3 that are not
attributable to PS4 will remain partnership items.
(c) Effective/applicability date. The rules of this section, when
adopted as final regulations in the Federal Register, will apply to
partner taxable years
[[Page 7209]]
ending on or after the date of publication of these proposed
regulations in the Federal Register.
Dated: February 9, 2009.
Linda M. Kroening,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E9-3069 Filed 2-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P