Draft Guidance for Industry on Bioequivalence Recommendation for Vancomycin HCl; Extension of Comment Period, 6640-6641 [E9-2800]
Download as PDF
erowe on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
6640
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 10, 2009 / Notices
the Patent and Trademark Office
requested that FDA determine the
product’s regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
VETMEDIN is 2,751 days. Of this time,
2,715 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 36 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 512(j) of the act (21 U.S.C.
360b(j)) became effective: October 20,
1999. The applicant claims April 8,
1999, as the date the investigational new
animal drug application (INAD) became
effective. However, the date that a major
health or environmental effects test is
begun or the date on which the agency
acknowledges the filing of a notice of
claimed investigational exemption for a
new animal drug, whichever is earlier,
is the effective date for the INAD.
According to FDA records, October 20,
1999, is the effective date for the INAD.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
animal drug product under section 512
of the act: March 26, 2007. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that the
new animal drug application (NADA)
for VETMEDIN (NADA 141–273) was
initially submitted on March 26, 2007.
3. The date the application was
approved: April 30, 2007. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that
NADA 141–273 was approved on April
30, 2007.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,492 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by April 13, 2009.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
August 10, 2009. To meet its burden, the
petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:25 Feb 09, 2009
Jkt 217001
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: February 2, 2009.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E9–2684 Filed 2–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2008–D–0626]
Draft Guidance for Industry on
Bioequivalence Recommendation for
Vancomycin HCl; Extension of
Comment Period
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION: Notice; extension of comment
period.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is extending to
March 19, 2009, the comment period for
the draft guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Bioequivalence Recommendation for
Vancomycin HCl’’ that published in the
Federal Register of December 16, 2008
(73 FR 76362). The draft guidance
provides specific guidance on the
design of bioequivalence (BE) studies to
support abbreviated new drug
applications (ANDAs) for vancomycin
HCl capsules. FDA is taking this action
in response to requests for an extension
of the comment period to allow
interested persons additional time to
submit comments.
DATES: Although you can comment on
any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the agency
considers your comment on this draft
guidance before it begins work on the
final version of the guidance, submit
written or electronic comments on the
draft guidance by March 19, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
to the Division of Dockets Management
(HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to the draft guidance
document.
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doan T. Nguyen, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (HFD–600),
Food and Drug Administration, 7519
Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 240–
276–9314.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the Federal Register of December
16, 2008 (73 FR 76362), FDA published
a notice announcing the availability of
a draft guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Bioequivalence Recommendation for
Vancomycin HCl.’’ As described in the
notice, the draft guidance further
clarifies FDA’s recommendations on the
design of BE studies to support ANDAs
for vancomycin HCl capsules. As also
described in the notice, FDA will
consider comments on the draft
guidance as it finalizes its BE
recommendations and addresses the
complicated issues raised in
ViroPharma Inc.’s (ViroPharma’s)
petitions for stay of action challenging
FDA’s revised BE recommendations
(Docket No. FDA–2006–P–0007).
By letter dated December 19, 2008,
ViroPharma requested that FDA extend
the comment period for the draft
guidance by 60 days. In support of its
request, ViroPharma provided several
reasons that explained why it believes
an extension is appropriate, including
that the issues involved with the draft
guidance are complex and that the
current 60-day comment period for the
notice includes the months of December
and early January when many interested
persons are on holiday vacation. While
ViroPharma acknowledges that the
Federal Register notice announcing the
availability of this draft guidance
indicates that comments to guidance
documents may be submitted at any
time, ViroPharma states that it is
essential that FDA be able to review and
consider comprehensive comments from
all stakeholders before finalizing the
guidance. In addition, by letter dated
January 23, 2009, the Biotechnology
Industry Organization (BIO) requested
that FDA extend the comment period for
the draft guidance to provide interested
persons additional time to submit
comments, and by letter dated February
2, 2009, Akorn Inc. objected to BIO’s
extension request.
FDA has considered ViroPharma’s
and BIO’s requests and Akorn’s
objection. FDA does not believe that a
60-day extension as requested by
ViroPharma is warranted, but in
response to ViroPharma’s and BIO’s
requests, FDA is extending the comment
period for the draft guidance for 30
days, until March 19, 2009. This
extension will provide interested
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 10, 2009 / Notices
persons with a total of 90 days to submit
comments before FDA begins work on
the final version of the guidance. The
agency believes that this 30-day
extension allows adequate time for
interested persons to submit comments
without significantly delaying FDA
consideration of these important issues.
II. Request for Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments on this document. Submit a
single copy of electronic comments or
two paper copies of any mailed
comments, except that individuals may
submit one paper copy. Comments are
to be identified with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document. Received comments may be
seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at either
https://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/
index.htm or https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: February 4, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E9–2800 Filed 2–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0664]
Food Labeling Workshop; Public
Workshop
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
erowe on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
ACTION:
Notice of public workshop.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), Office of
Regulatory Affairs, Southwest Regional
Small Business Representative (SWR
SBR) Program, in collaboration with The
University of Arkansas, is announcing a
public workshop entitled ‘‘Food
Labeling Workshop.’’ This public
workshop is intended to provide
information about FDA food labeling
regulations and other related subjects to
the regulated industry, particularly
small businesses and startups.
Date and Time: This public workshop
will be held on April 21, 2009, from 8
a.m. to 5 p.m., and on April 22, 2009,
from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:40 Feb 09, 2009
Jkt 217001
Location: The public workshop will
be held at the Continuing Education
Center, Two East Center St.,
Fayetteville, AR (located downtown).
Contact: David Arvelo, Small
Business Representative, Food and Drug
Administration, Southwest Regional
Office, 4040 North Central Expressway,
suite 900, Dallas, TX 75204, 214–253–
4952, FAX: 214–253–4970, or e–mail:
david.arvelo@fda.hhs.gov.
For information on accommodation
options, contact Steven C. Seideman,
2650 North Young Ave., Institute of
Food Science & Engineering, University
of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704,
479–575–4221, FAX: 479–575–2165, or
e–mail: seideman@uark.edu.
Registration: You are encouraged to
register by April 10, 2009. The
University of Arkansas has a $250
registration fee to cover the cost of
facilities, materials, and breaks. Seats
are limited; please submit your
registration as soon as possible. Course
space will be filled in order of receipt
of registration. Those accepted into the
course will receive confirmation.
Registration will close after the course is
filled. Registration at the site is not
guaranteed but may be possible on a
space available basis on the day of the
public workshop beginning at 8 a.m.
The cost of registration at the site is
$350 payable to: ‘‘The University of
Arkansas.’’ If you need special
accommodations due to a disability,
please contact Steven C. Seideman (see
Contact) at least 14 days in advance.
Registration Instructions: To register,
please submit your name, affiliation,
mailing address, phone/fax number, and
e–mail, along with a check or money
order for $250 payable to the ‘‘The
University of Arkansas.’’ Mail to:
Institute of Food Science & Engineering,
University of Arkansas, 2650 North
Young Ave., Fayetteville, AR 72704.
Transcripts: Transcripts of the public
workshop will not be available due to
the format of this workshop. Course
handouts may be requested at cost
through the Freedom of Information
Office (HFI–35), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, rm.
6–30, Rockville, MD 20857,
approximately 15 working days after the
public workshop at a cost of 10 cents
per page.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
public workshop is being held in
response to the large volume of food
labeling inquiries from small food
manufacturers and startups originating
from the area covered by the FDA Dallas
District Office. The SWR SBR presents
these workshops to help achieve
objectives set forth in section 406 of the
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6641
Food and Drug Administration
Modernization Act of 1997 (21 U.S.C.
393), which include working closely
with stakeholders and maximizing the
availability and clarity of information to
stakeholders and the public. This is
consistent with the purposes of the SBR
Program, which are in part to respond
to industry inquiries, develop
educational materials, sponsor
workshops and conferences to provide
firms, particularly small businesses,
with firsthand working knowledge of
FDA’s requirements and compliance
policies. This workshop is also
consistent with the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (Public Law 104–121), as outreach
activities by government agencies to
small businesses.
The goal of this public workshop is to
present information that will enable
manufacturers and regulated industry to
better comply with labeling
requirements, especially in light of
growing concerns about obesity and
food allergens. Information presented
will be based on agency position as
articulated through regulation,
compliance policy guides, and
information previously made available
to the public. Topics to be discussed at
the workshop include: (1) Mandatory
label elements, (2) nutrition labeling
requirements, (3) health and nutrition
claims, (4) the Food Allergen Labeling
and Consumer Protection Act of 2004,
and (5) special labeling issues such as
exemptions. FDA expects that
participation in this public workshop
will provide regulated industry with
greater understanding of the regulatory
and policy perspectives on food labeling
and increase voluntary compliance.
Dated: January 26, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E9–2811 Filed 2–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0664]
Food Protection; Public Workshop
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS
ACTION:
Notice of public workshop
The Food and Drug Administration
(FDA), Office of Regulatory Affairs
(ORA), Southwest Regional Office
(SWRO), in co-sponsorship with the
University of Arkansas Institute of Food
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6640-6641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2800]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2008-D-0626]
Draft Guidance for Industry on Bioequivalence Recommendation for
Vancomycin HCl; Extension of Comment Period
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice; extension of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is extending to March
19, 2009, the comment period for the draft guidance for industry
entitled ``Bioequivalence Recommendation for Vancomycin HCl'' that
published in the Federal Register of December 16, 2008 (73 FR 76362).
The draft guidance provides specific guidance on the design of
bioequivalence (BE) studies to support abbreviated new drug
applications (ANDAs) for vancomycin HCl capsules. FDA is taking this
action in response to requests for an extension of the comment period
to allow interested persons additional time to submit comments.
DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the agency considers your comment on this
draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit written or electronic comments on the draft guidance
by March 19, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to the draft guidance document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doan T. Nguyen, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (HFD-600), Food and Drug Administration, 7519
Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 240-276-9314.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the Federal Register of December 16, 2008 (73 FR 76362), FDA
published a notice announcing the availability of a draft guidance for
industry entitled ``Bioequivalence Recommendation for Vancomycin HCl.''
As described in the notice, the draft guidance further clarifies FDA's
recommendations on the design of BE studies to support ANDAs for
vancomycin HCl capsules. As also described in the notice, FDA will
consider comments on the draft guidance as it finalizes its BE
recommendations and addresses the complicated issues raised in
ViroPharma Inc.'s (ViroPharma's) petitions for stay of action
challenging FDA's revised BE recommendations (Docket No. FDA-2006-P-
0007).
By letter dated December 19, 2008, ViroPharma requested that FDA
extend the comment period for the draft guidance by 60 days. In support
of its request, ViroPharma provided several reasons that explained why
it believes an extension is appropriate, including that the issues
involved with the draft guidance are complex and that the current 60-
day comment period for the notice includes the months of December and
early January when many interested persons are on holiday vacation.
While ViroPharma acknowledges that the Federal Register notice
announcing the availability of this draft guidance indicates that
comments to guidance documents may be submitted at any time, ViroPharma
states that it is essential that FDA be able to review and consider
comprehensive comments from all stakeholders before finalizing the
guidance. In addition, by letter dated January 23, 2009, the
Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) requested that FDA extend the
comment period for the draft guidance to provide interested persons
additional time to submit comments, and by letter dated February 2,
2009, Akorn Inc. objected to BIO's extension request.
FDA has considered ViroPharma's and BIO's requests and Akorn's
objection. FDA does not believe that a 60-day extension as requested by
ViroPharma is warranted, but in response to ViroPharma's and BIO's
requests, FDA is extending the comment period for the draft guidance
for 30 days, until March 19, 2009. This extension will provide
interested
[[Page 6641]]
persons with a total of 90 days to submit comments before FDA begins
work on the final version of the guidance. The agency believes that
this 30-day extension allows adequate time for interested persons to
submit comments without significantly delaying FDA consideration of
these important issues.
II. Request for Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments on this document. Submit
a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any mailed
comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy. Comments
are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
either https://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/index.htm or https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: February 4, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E9-2800 Filed 2-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S