Petition for Waiver of Compliance, 6692-6693 [E9-2382]
Download as PDF
6692
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 10, 2009 / Notices
Dr. Mary D. Gunnels, Director,
Medical Programs, (202) 366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Room 8301,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Office
hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Electronic Access
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
You may see all the comments online
through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2year period if it finds ‘‘such exemption
would likely achieve a level of safety
that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
level that would be achieved absent
such exemption.’’ The statute also
allows the Agency to renew exemptions
at the end of the 2-year period. The
comment period ended on January 15,
2009.
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received no comments in this
proceeding.
The Agency has not received any
adverse evidence on any of these drivers
that indicates that safety is being
compromised. Based upon its
evaluation of the 13 renewal
applications, FMCSA renews the
Federal vision exemptions for Johnny
Becerra, Ross E. Burroughs, Lester W.
Carter, Christopher L. DePuy, John B.
Ethridge, Larry J. Folkerts, Paul W.
Hunter, Ray P. Lenz, Michael B.
McClure, Francis M. McMullin, Norman
Mullins, Harold W. Mumford and David
J. Triplett.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, each renewal exemption will
be valid for 2 years unless revoked
earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will
be revoked if: (1) the person fails to
comply with the terms and conditions
of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than
was maintained before it was granted; or
(3) continuation of the exemption would
not be consistent with the goals and
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
erowe on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
[Docket No. FMCSA–02–12844; FMCSA–04–
19477; FMCSA–06–26066]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Renewals; Vision
ACTION:
Notice of final disposition.
SUMMARY: FMCSA previously
announced its decision to renew the
exemptions from the vision requirement
in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations for 13 individuals. FMCSA
has statutory authority to exempt
individuals from the vision requirement
if the exemptions granted will not
compromise safety. The Agency has
reviewed the comments submitted in
response to the previous announcement
and concluded that granting these
exemptions will provide a level of safety
that will be equivalent to, or greater
than, the level of safety maintained
without the exemptions for these
commercial motor vehicle (CMV)
drivers.
Issued on: February 3, 2009.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9–2758 Filed 2–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Conclusion
Issued on: February 3, 2009.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9–2757 Filed 2–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
Conclusion
The Agency has not received any
adverse evidence on any of these drivers
that indicates that safety is being
compromised. Based upon its
evaluation of the 13 renewal
applications, FMCSA renews the
Federal vision exemptions for Howard
F. Breitkreutz, John E. Evenson, Steven
C. Humke, Neil W. Jennings, Craig M.
Landry, Joe L. Meredith, Jr., Richard W.
Nordhausen, Jr., Tony E. Parks, Andrew
H. Rusk, Jesse J. Sutton, Kenneth E.
Vigue, Jr., David G. Williams, and
Richard A. Winslow.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, each renewal exemption will
be valid for 2 years unless revoked
earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will
be revoked if: (1) The person fails to
comply with the terms and conditions
of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than
was maintained before it was granted; or
(3) continuation of the exemption would
not be consistent with the goals and
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
14:17 Feb 09, 2009
Jkt 217001
Dr. Mary D. Gunnels, Director,
Medical Programs, (202) 366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Room 8301,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Office
hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online
through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2year period if it finds ‘‘such exemption
would likely achieve a level of safety
that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
level that would be achieved absent
such exemption.’’ The statute also
allows the Agency to renew exemptions
at the end of the 2-year period. The
comment period ended on January 15,
2009.
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received no comments in this
proceeding.
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) received
a request for a waiver of compliance
from certain requirements of its safety
standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party
seeking relief, the regulatory provisions
involved, the nature of the relief being
requested, and the petitioner’s
arguments in favor of relief.
Union Pacific Railroad Company
[Docket Number FRA–2008–0166]
The Union Pacific Railroad Company
(UP) seeks a waiver of compliance from
certain provisions of 49 CFR Part 218,
Railroad Operating Practices.
Specifically, UP is requesting a waiver
of Blue Signal Requirements as
prescribed in 49 CFR 218.25 Workers on
a main track, in Kansas City, KS, and
Kansas City, MO. These tracks are in the
middle of the Kansas City facilities and
are used for functions normally
performed on yard tracks. Trains
passing through the Kansas City
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
erowe on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 10, 2009 / Notices
Terminal stop for fuel, locomotive
inspection, or adding or removing
power from the train. To perform this
work on the main track, UP must
provide blue signal protection under 49
CFR 218.25. This request is for the
following track locations:
• Main 1 and Main 2 between
Manchester and Troost (MX279–
MX281).
• Main 1 and Main 2 at 18th St.
between KX004 and KX006.
• Mainline at 10th St. (KX287–
KX289).
UP is requesting flexibility to treat
these main tracks at the Kansas City
facilities as tracks other than main
tracks so they can have the option of
protecting its employees working on,
under, or between rolling equipment in
accordance with § 218.25 Workers on a
main track, or § 218.27 Workers on track
other than main track, or a combination
of both. UP believes that the safest and
most efficient method of protecting its
employees in the Kansas City facilities
is through the use of a combination of
blue signal protection and remotely
controlled switches. UP believes that
this request is similar to a waiver
originally granted to the SP at El Paso,
TX, and renewed to UP under Docket
Number FRA–2000–7669. UP states they
have operated under the requirements of
that waiver without any adverse effect
on safety of operations and would like
to have the same conditions for this
request.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2008–
0166) and may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:17 Feb 09, 2009
Jkt 217001
Communications received within 45
days of the date of this notice will be
considered by FRA before final action is
taken. Comments received after that
date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
Issued in Washington, DC, on January 30,
2009.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9–2382 Filed 2–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
[USCG–2007–28535]
Atlantic Sea Island Group LLC, Safe
Harbor Energy Liquefied Natural Gas
Deepwater Port License Application;
Preparation of Environmental Impact
Statement
Maritime Administration, DOT.
Notice of extending the scoping
comment period to March 11, 2009 and
corrected project location information.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
By Federal Register notice of
January 9, 2009 (74 FR 982–984) the
Maritime Administration and the Coast
Guard announced the intent to prepare
an environmental impact statement
(EIS) for the Atlantic Sea Island Group
LLC, Safe Harbor Energy liquefied
natural gas deepwater port license
application located in Federal Waters
approximately 13.5 miles south of the
City of Long Beach, New York, 19 miles
east of Highlands, New Jersey, and 23
miles southeast of the Ports of New York
and New Jersey. The project location
was incorrectly noted in the referenced
Federal Register notice. The correct
proposed location is in the area between
the Ambrose-to-Nantucket and Hudson
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6693
Canyon-to-Ambrose shipping lanes,
located at approximately 40°23′ N and
73°36′ W, in water depth of between 60
and 70 feet covering an area known as
Cholera Bank.
The EIS will be prepared with the
New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC)
as a cooperating agency in the
environmental review with the Coast
Guard. The EIS will meet the
requirements of both the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and
the New York State Environmental
Quality Review Act (SEQRA). In
addition, the Coast Guard and the
Maritime Administration will be
working with appropriate state agency
representatives from New Jersey to
ensure potential impacts and concerns
of New Jersey are addressed in the EIS.
Publication of this notice began a 30
day scoping process and requested
public participation to assist in the
identification and determination of the
environmental issues to be addressed in
the EIS with a deadline for submitting
comments of February 9, 2009.
In addition to receiving comments at
the public scoping meetings on January
27, 2009 and January 29, 2009,
instructions were provided for
submitting comments to the Department
of Transportation (DOT) Docket
Management Facility and to the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS).
The Coast Guard and Maritime
Administration have received several
requests to extend the scoping comment
period; therefore, upon further
consideration the scoping comment
period is extended to March 11, 2009.
DATES: Comments or related material
must be received by March 11, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Docket submissions for
USCG–2007–28535 should be addressed
to: Department of Transportation,
Docket Management Facility, West
Building, Ground Floor, Room W12–
140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
The Docket Management Facility
accepts hand-delivered submissions,
and makes docket contents available for
public inspection and copying at this
address between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Facility telephone
number is 202–366–9329, the fax
number is 202–493–2251, and the Web
site for electronic submissions or for
electronic access to docket contents is:
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Prescott, U.S. Coast Guard,
telephone: 202–372–1440, e-mail:
Mark.A.Prescott@uscg.mil; or LT
Hannah Kawamoto, U.S. Coast Guard,
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6692-6693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2382]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration
(FRA) received a request for a waiver of compliance from certain
requirements of its safety standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party seeking relief, the regulatory
provisions involved, the nature of the relief being requested, and the
petitioner's arguments in favor of relief.
Union Pacific Railroad Company
[Docket Number FRA-2008-0166]
The Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) seeks a waiver of
compliance from certain provisions of 49 CFR Part 218, Railroad
Operating Practices. Specifically, UP is requesting a waiver of Blue
Signal Requirements as prescribed in 49 CFR 218.25 Workers on a main
track, in Kansas City, KS, and Kansas City, MO. These tracks are in the
middle of the Kansas City facilities and are used for functions
normally performed on yard tracks. Trains passing through the Kansas
City
[[Page 6693]]
Terminal stop for fuel, locomotive inspection, or adding or removing
power from the train. To perform this work on the main track, UP must
provide blue signal protection under 49 CFR 218.25. This request is for
the following track locations:
Main 1 and Main 2 between Manchester and Troost (MX279-
MX281).
Main 1 and Main 2 at 18th St. between KX004 and KX006.
Mainline at 10th St. (KX287-KX289).
UP is requesting flexibility to treat these main tracks at the
Kansas City facilities as tracks other than main tracks so they can
have the option of protecting its employees working on, under, or
between rolling equipment in accordance with Sec. 218.25 Workers on a
main track, or Sec. 218.27 Workers on track other than main track, or
a combination of both. UP believes that the safest and most efficient
method of protecting its employees in the Kansas City facilities is
through the use of a combination of blue signal protection and remotely
controlled switches. UP believes that this request is similar to a
waiver originally granted to the SP at El Paso, TX, and renewed to UP
under Docket Number FRA-2000-7669. UP states they have operated under
the requirements of that waiver without any adverse effect on safety of
operations and would like to have the same conditions for this request.
Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-
2008-0166) and may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Web site: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Communications received within 45 days of the date of this notice
will be considered by FRA before final action is taken. Comments
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All
written communications concerning these proceedings are available for
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at the above
facility. All documents in the public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet at the docket facility's Web
site at https://www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages
19477-78).
Issued in Washington, DC, on January 30, 2009.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program
Development.
[FR Doc. E9-2382 Filed 2-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P