Regulated Navigation Area and Safety Zone, Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, Romeoville, IL, 6352-6357 [E9-2408]
Download as PDF
6352
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 25 / Monday, February 9, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Webster
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Missouri:
Barry
Barton
Benton
Bollinger
Butler
Camden
Cape Girardeau
Carter
Cedar
Dade
Dallas
Dent
Douglas
Hickory
Howell
Iron
Jasper
Lawrence
Madison
Maries
Miller
Mississippi
Moniteau
Morgan
New Madrid
Newton
Oregon
Ozark
Perry
Polk
Reynolds
Ripley
St. Clair
Scott
Shannon
Stoddard
Stone
Taney
Texas
Vernon
Wayne
Wright
Kansas:
Cherokee
Crawford
McIntosh
Nowata
Okfuskee
Okmulgee
Ottawa
Pawnee
Pushmataha
Sequoyah
Washington
Arkansas:
Benton
Carroll
Crawford
Madison
Sebastian
Washington
Missouri:
McDonald
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E9–2629 Filed 2–6–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Commodity Credit Corporation
7 CFR Part 1412
RIN 0560-AH84
Direct and Counter-Cyclical Program
and Average Crop Revenue Election
Program
Correction
In rule document E8–30763 beginning
on page 79284 in the issue of December
29, 2008, make the following correction:
§1412.53
[Corrected]
On page 79299, in the third column,
§1412.53(b)(1)(ii)(K) should read:
(K) Other oilseeds–$9.30/cwt.
[FR Doc. Z8–30763 Filed 2–6–09; 8:45 am]
*
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
*
*
*
*
OKLAHOMA
*
*
Tulsa
Survey Area
*
*
*
Oklahoma:
Creek
Mayes
Muskogee
Osage
Pittsburg
Rogers
Tulsa
Wagoner
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Oklahoma:
Adair
Cherokee
Choctaw
Craig
Delaware
Haskell
Kay
Latimer
Le Flore
McCurtain
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:25 Feb 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
This temporary interim rule places
navigational and operational restrictions
on all vessels transiting the navigable
waters located adjacent to and over the
Army Corps of Engineers’ electrical
dispersal fish barrier system.
DATES: This temporary interim rule is
effective from 11:59 p.m. on January 17,
2009, until September 30, 2009.
Comments and related material must
reach the Docket Management Facility
on or before April 10, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2008–1247 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329. To avoid duplication,
please use only one of these methods.
For instructions on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Public Participation
and Request for Comments’’.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call CDR Tim Cummins, Deputy
Prevention Division, Ninth Coast Guard
District, telephone 216–902–6045. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2008–1247]
RIN 1625–AA11
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
Regulated Navigation Area and Safety
Zone, Chicago Sanitary and Ship
Canal, Romeoville, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary interim rule with
request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a regulated navigation area
and safety zone on the Chicago Sanitary
and Ship Canal near Romeoville, IL.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2008–1247),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online, or by fax, mail or hand
delivery, but please use only one of
these means. We recommend that you
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 25 / Monday, February 9, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
include your name and a mailing
address, an e-mail address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, select the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, insert ‘‘USCG–
2008–1247’’ in the Docket ID box, press
Enter, and then click on the balloon
shape in the Actions column. If you
submit your comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit them by mail and
would like to know that they reached
the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period
and may change this rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, select the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, insert USCG–
2008–1247 in the Docket ID box, press
Enter, and then click on the item in the
Docket ID column. You may also visit
either the Docket Management Facility
in Room W12–140 on the ground floor
of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
We have an agreement with the
Department of Transportation to use the
Docket Management Facility.
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one to the Docket Management
Facility at the address under ADDRESSES
explaining why one would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:25 Feb 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary interim rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the
electric current in the water poses a
safety risk to commercial and
recreational boaters who transit the area.
Likewise, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal
Register because of the safety risk to
commercial and recreational boaters
who transit the area. The following
discussion and the Background and
Purpose section below provides
additional support of the Coast Guard’s
determination that good causes exists
for not publishing a NPRM and for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication.
In 2002, the Army Corps of Engineers
energized a demonstration electrical
dispersal barrier located in the Chicago
Sanitary and Ship Canal. The
demonstration barrier, commonly
referred to as ‘‘Barrier I,’’ generates a
low-voltage electric field (one-volt per
inch) across the canal, which connects
the Illinois River to Lake Michigan.
Barrier I was built to block the passage
of aquatic nuisance species, such as
Asian carp, and prevent them from
moving between the Mississippi River
basin and Great Lakes via the canal. In
2006, the Army Corps completed
construction of a new barrier, ‘‘Barrier
IIA.’’ Barrier IIA is designed to operate
continuously at one-volt per inch, and
can operate at higher levels. Barrier IIA
is slated to undergo additional testing to
determine optimal operating levels.
Because of its design, Barrier IIA can
generate a more powerful electric field,
over a larger area within the Chicago
Sanitary and Ship Canal, than Barrier I.
A comprehensive, independent
analysis of Barrier IIA, conducted in
2008, at the one-volt per inch level,
found a serious risk of injury or death
to persons immersed in the water
located adjacent to and over the barrier.
Additionally, sparking between barges
transiting the barrier (a risk to
flammable cargoes) occurred at the one-
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6353
volt per inch level. Operating Barrier IIA
at four-volts per inch (the maximum
capacity) presents a higher risk;
however, there is no data yet to indicate
how much higher. The Coast Guard and
Army Corps developed regulations and
safety guidelines, with stakeholder
input, which addressed the risks and
hazards associated with operating the
barriers at the one-volt per inch level.
These regulations were published in 33
CFR 165.923, 70 FR 76692 (Dec 28,
2005) and in a series of temporary final
rules: 71 FR 4488 (Jan 27, 2006); 71 FR
19648 (Apr 17, 2006); 73 FR 33337 (Jun
12, 2008); 73 FR 37810 (Jul 2, 2008); 73
FR 45875 (Aug 7, 2008); and 73 FR
63633 (Oct 27, 2008).
The Army Corps of Engineers recently
notified the Coast Guard that it plans to
activate Barrier IIA on a full-time basis
starting in middle to late January 2009.
Both Barrier IIA and Barrier I will
operate at the same time; hence, Barrier
I will provide a redundant back up to
Barrier IIA.
The Coast Guard has advised the
Army Corps of Engineers that it has no
objection to the Army Corps activating
Barrier IIA at a maximum strength of
one-volt per inch, which is the
operating strength of Barrier I. In
addition, the Coast Guard advised the
Army Corps that it does not object to the
Army Corps’ plans for additional testing
of Barrier IIA at peak field strength of
up to four-volts per inch. Peak field
strength tests are necessary to evaluate
safety risks to mariners and their vessels
when Barrier IIA is operated at a higher
voltage.
To mitigate the safety risks created by
operation of the barriers, navigational
and operational restrictions are
necessary for all vessels transiting
through the navigable waters located
adjacent to and over the barriers.
Specifically, and as discussed in more
detail in the Discussion of the Rule
section below, the Coast Guard is
establishing a regulated navigation area,
which requires vessels to adhere to
specified operational and navigational
requirements while inside the regulated
navigation area. In addition, the Coast
Guard will occasionally enforce a safety
zone, which prohibits the movement of
all vessels and persons through the
electrical dispersal barriers during tests
of Barrier IIA at voltages higher than
one-volt per inch.
Background and Purpose
The Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance
Prevention and Control Act of 1990, as
amended by the National Invasive
Species Act of 1996, authorized the
Army Corps of Engineers to conduct a
demonstration project to identify an
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
6354
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 25 / Monday, February 9, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
environmentally sound method for
preventing and reducing the dispersal of
non-indigenous aquatic nuisance
species through the Chicago Sanitary
and Ship Canal. The Army Corps of
Engineers selected an electric barrier
because it is a non-lethal deterrent with
a proven history, which does not overtly
interfere with navigation in the canal.
A demonstration dispersal barrier
(Barrier I) was constructed and has been
in operation since April 2002. It is
located approximately 30 miles from
Lake Michigan and creates an electric
field in the water by pulsing low voltage
DC current through steel cables secured
to the bottom of the canal. A second
barrier, Barrier IIA, was constructed 800
to 1300 feet downstream of the Barrier
I. The potential field strength for Barrier
IIA will be up to four times that of the
Barrier I. Barrier IIA was successfully
operated for the first time for
approximately seven weeks in
September and October 2008, while
Barrier I was taken down for
maintenance. Construction on a third
barrier (Barrier IIB) is planned; Barrier
IIB would augment the capabilities of
Barriers I and IIA.
In the spring of 2004, a commercial
towboat operator reported an electrical
arc between a wire rope and timberhead
while making up a tow in the vicinity
of the Barrier I. During subsequent
Army Corps of Engineers safety testing
in January 2005, sparking was observed
upon metal-to-metal contact between
two independent barges in the barrier
field.
The electric current in the water poses
a safety risk to commercial and
recreational boaters transiting the area.
The Navy Experimental Diving Unit
(NEDU) was tasked with researching
how the electric current from the
barriers would affect a human body if
immersed in the water. The NEDU final
report concluded that the possible
effects to a human body if immersed in
the water include paralysis of body
muscles, inability to breathe, and
ventricular fibrillation.
A Safety Work Group facilitated by
the Coast Guard and in partnership with
the Army Corps of Engineers and
industry initially met in February 2008
and focused on three goals: (1)
Education and public outreach, (2)
keeping people out of the water, and (3)
egress/rescue efforts. The Safety Work
Group has regularly been attended by
eleven stakeholders. Key partners
include the American Waterways
Operators, Illinois River Carriers
Association, Army Corps of Engineers
Chicago District, Coast Guard Marine
Safety Unit Chicago, Coast Guard Sector
Lake Michigan/Captain of the Port Lake
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:25 Feb 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
Michigan, and the Ninth Coast Guard
District. During the past twelve months,
the Coast Guard has hosted five Safety
Work Group meetings with full
participation from stakeholders.
Based on the commercial significance
and successful transit history of the
Barrier I by thousands of barges since its
inception in April 2002, and Barrier IIA
during Fall 2008, the Coast Guard has
not chosen to close the waterway
despite the proven electrical discharge
hazard and additional safety concerns.
Tows spanning Barrier IIA and the coal
fired power plant barge loading area just
south of the RNA remain a concern.
Accordingly, because of the safety risks
involved, it is imperative that the Coast
Guard implements increased safety
measures for the operation of both
Barriers I and IIA.
In addition to this temporary interim
rule, the Coast Guard intends to publish
a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM). The NPRM will propose
establishing a permanent regulated
navigation area and safety zone that is
identical to the regulated navigation
area and safety zone established by this
temporary interim rule. We encourage
the public to participate in the rule
proposed by our NPRM by submitting
comments and related materials to the
docket. The NPRM will contain
information on how to submit
comments and will be part of the docket
number for this rulemaking (USCG–
2008–1247). To view the NPRM, once
published, as well as documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov at any time, click
on ‘‘Search for Dockets,’’ and enter the
docket number for this rulemaking
(USCG–2008–1247) in the Docket ID
box, and click enter. You may also visit
the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12–140 on the ground floor of
the DOT West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
Discussion of Rule
This temporary interim rule will
suspend 33 CFR 165.923 and will place
additional restrictions on all vessels
transiting through the navigable waters
located adjacent to and over the
electrical dispersal barriers located on
the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal.
The regulated navigation area
encompasses all waters of the Chicago
Sanitary and Ship Canal located
between mile marker 295.0
(approximately 1.1 miles south of the
Romeo Road Bridge) and mile marker
297.5 (approximately 1.3 miles
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
northeast of the Romeo Road Bridge).
The requirements placed on commercial
vessels include: (1) Vessels engaged in
commercial service, as defined in 46
U.S.C. 2101(5), may not pass (meet or
overtake) in the regulated navigation
area and must make a SECURITE call
when approaching the regulated
navigation area to announce intentions
and work out passing arrangements on
either side; (2) commercial tows
transiting the regulated navigation area
must be made up with wire rope to
ensure electrical connectivity between
all segments of the tow; and (3) all upbound and down-bound barge tows that
contain one or more red flag barges must
be assisted by a bow boat until the
entire tow is clear of the regulated
navigation area. Red flag barges are
barges certificated to carry, in bulk, any
hazardous material as defined in 46 CFR
§ 150.115. Currently, 46 CFR § 150.115
defines hazardous material as:
(a) A flammable liquid as defined in
46 CFR 30.10–22 or a combustible
liquid as defined in 46 CFR 30.10–15;
(b) A material listed in Table 151.05,
Table 1 of part 153, or Table 4 of part
154 of Title 46, CFR; or
(c) A liquid, liquefied gas, or
compressed gas listed in 49 CFR
172.101.
The Army Corps of Engineers has
informed the Coast Guard that the Corps
will continue to contract bow boat
assistance for barge tows containing one
or more red flag barges. The Army Corps
of Engineers has also advised the Coast
Guard that they have funds to contract
bow boat assistance through September
30, 2009. Operators of tows containing
one or more red flag barges should
notify the bow boat contractor at least
two hours prior to the need for
assistance. The tow operator should
then remain in contact with the
contractor after the initial call for bow
boat assistance and advise the
contractor of any delays. Information on
how to arrange for bow boat assistance
may be obtained by contacting the Army
Corps of Engineers at 312–846–5333,
during normal working hours. The Coast
Guard will also publish this information
in its Local Notice to Mariners.
This temporary interim rule places
additional restrictions and operating
requirements on all vessels within a
smaller portion of the regulated
navigation area, specifically, the waters
between the Romeo Road Bridge
(approximate mile marker 296.18) and
mile marker 296.7 (aerial pipeline
located approximately 0.51 miles north
east of Romeo Road Bridge). Within this
smaller area, this temporary interim rule
prohibits all vessels from loitering,
mooring or laying up on the right or left
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 25 / Monday, February 9, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
descending banks, or making or
breaking tows on the waters between the
Romeo Road Bridge (approximate mile
marker 296.18) and mile marker 296.7
(aerial pipeline located approximately
0.51 miles north east of Romeo Road
Bridge). In addition, vessels may only
enter the waters between the Romeo
Road Bridge (approximate mile marker
296.18) and mile marker 296.7 (aerial
pipeline located approximately 0.51
miles north east of Romeo Road Bridge)
for the sole purpose of transiting to the
other side and must maintain headway
throughout the transit. All vessels and
persons are prohibited from dredging,
laying cable, dragging, fishing,
conducting salvage operations, or any
other activity, which could disturb the
bottom of the canal in the area located
between the Romeo Road Bridge
(approximate mile marker 296.18) and
mile marker 296.7 (aerial pipeline
located approximately 0.51 miles north
east of Romeo Road Bridge). The
temporary interim rule also requires all
personnel on open decks to wear a Coast
Guard approved Type I personal
flotation device while on the waters
between the Romeo Road Bridge
(approximate mile marker 296.18) and
mile marker 296.7 (aerial pipeline
located approximately 0.51 miles north
east of Romeo Road Bridge).
These restrictions are necessary for
safe navigation of the regulated
navigation area and to ensure the safety
of vessels and their personnel as well as
the public’s safety due to the electrical
discharges noted during safety tests
conducted by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers. Deviation from this
temporary interim rule is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the
Commander, Ninth Coast Guard District
or his designated representatives. The
Commander, Ninth Coast Guard District
designates Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan and Commanding Officer,
Marine Safety Unit Chicago, as his
designated representatives for the
purposes of the regulated navigation
area.
A safety zone will be enforced during
tests of Barrier IIA at voltages higher
than one-volt per inch. This safety zone,
which encompasses all the waters of the
Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal
located between mile marker 296.0
(approximately 958 feet south of the
Romeo Road Bridge) and mile marker
296.7 (aerial pipeline located
approximately 0.51 miles north east of
Romeo Road Bridge), will be enforced
by the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan, for such times before, during,
and after barrier testing as he or she
deems necessary to protect mariners and
vessels from damage or injury. The
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:25 Feb 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
6355
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan will
cause notice of enforcement or
suspension of enforcement of this safety
zone to be made by all appropriate
means to effect the widest publicity
among the affected segments of the
public. Such means of notification will
include, but is not limited to, Broadcast
Notice to Mariners and Local Notice to
Mariners. The Captain of the Port will
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners
notifying the public when enforcement
of the safety zone is suspended. In
addition, Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan maintains a telephone line
that is manned 24 hours a day, seven
days a week. The public can obtain
information concerning enforcement of
the safety zone by contacting the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan via
the Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan
Command Center at (414) 747–7182.
and monitored vessel traffic during
closure of the waterway. During these
prior tests, testing occurred during
three, two-hour blocks of time. In
between these two-hour blocks of time,
vessel traffic was granted permission by
the Captain of the Port to transit through
the safety zone.
Exact dates, times and duration of
tests have not yet been finalized by the
Army Corps for testing Barrier IIA at
peak field strength. Nevertheless, the
Coast Guard will coordinate with the
Army Corps and waterway users, as it
has done during past testing.
Coordination efforts will include
providing as much advance notice as
possible to waterway users of planned
closures and working with the Army
Corps to structure testing dates, times
and duration so as to minimize delays
to vessels that transit the area.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small:
The owners and operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in a
portion of the Chicago Sanitary and
Ship Canal.
This regulated navigation area and
safety zone will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons: (1) Vessel traffic may
continue to transit through the regulated
navigation area; (2) the Army Corps of
Engineers intends to pay the cost of the
bow boat required by barge tows
containing one or more red flag barges
during the time this rule is effective; (3)
the safety zone will only be enforced on
an occasional basis; and (4) vessels may
request permission from the Captain of
the Port Lake Michigan to transit
through the safety zone when the safety
zone is enforced. The Coast Guard will
give notice to the public, using all
appropriate means to effect the widest
publicity among the affected segments
of the public, when the safety zone is
enforced and when enforcement is
suspended.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
This determination is based on the
following: (1) Vessel traffic may
continue to transit through the regulated
navigation area; (2) the Army Corps of
Engineers intends to pay the cost of the
bow boat required by barge tows
containing one or more red flag barges
during the time this rule is effective; (3)
the safety zone will only be enforced on
an occasional basis; and (4) vessels may
request permission from the Captain of
the Port Lake Michigan to transit
through the safety zone when the safety
zone is enforced.
As discussed in the ‘‘Regulatory
Information’’ section above, the Coast
Guard has established and enforced
temporary safety zones, which
prohibited all vessels from entering the
waters located over and adjacent to the
electric dispersal barriers during testing.
During past safety zone enforcement,
the Coast Guard, in coordination with
the Army Corps of Engineers, provided
advance notice of the waterway closure
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
6356
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 25 / Monday, February 9, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
As noted above, the Coast Guard
intends to publish an NPRM and
specifically seek public comment as to
a permanent regulated navigation area
and safety zone. The Coast Guard
encourages public comment regarding
the potential economic impact of the
regulated navigation area and safety
zone.
Taking of Private Property
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:25 Feb 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
The Coast Guard recognizes the treaty
rights of Native American Tribes.
Moreover, the Coast Guard is committed
to working with Tribal Governments to
implement local policies and to mitigate
tribal concerns. We have determined
that these regulations and fishing rights
protection need not be incompatible.
We have also determined that this rule
does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Nevertheless, Indian Tribes that have
questions concerning the provisions of
this rule or options for compliance are
encouraged to contact the point of
contact listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of the category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. Therefore, this rule is
categorically excluded, under section
2.B.2 Figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction and neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required. This rule involves the
establishing, disestablishing, or
changing of regulated navigation areas
and security or safety zones. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 25 / Monday, February 9, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
§ 165.923
[Suspended]
2. Section 165.923 is suspended from
January 18, 2009 until September 30,
2009.
■ 3. A new temporary § 165.T09–1247 is
added as follows:
■
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
§ 165.T09–1247 Regulated Navigation Area
and Safety Zone, Chicago Sanitary and Ship
Canal, Romeoville, IL.
(a) Regulated Navigation Area. The
following is a Regulated Navigation
Area: All waters of the Chicago Sanitary
and Ship Canal, Romeoville, IL located
between mile marker 295.0
(approximately 1.1 miles south of the
Romeo Road Bridge) and mile marker
297.5 (approximately 1.3 miles
northeast of the Romeo Road Bridge).
(1) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
Designated representatives means the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan and
Commanding Officer, Marine Safety
Unit Chicago.
Red flag barge means any barge
certificated to carry any hazardous
material in bulk.
Hazardous material means any
material as defined in 46 CFR 150.115.
Bow boat means a towing vessel
capable of providing positive control of
the bow of a tow containing one or more
barges, while transiting the regulated
navigation area. The bow boat must be
capable of preventing a tow containing
one or more barges from coming into
contact with the shore and other moored
vessels.
(2) Regulations. (i) The general
regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.13
apply.
(ii) All up-bound and down-bound
barge tows that contain one or more red
flag barges transiting through the
regulated navigation area must be
assisted by a bow boat until the entire
tow is clear of the regulated navigation
area.
(iii) Vessels engaged in commercial
service, as defined in 46 U.S.C. 2101(5),
may not pass (meet or overtake) in the
regulated navigation area and must
make a SECURITE call when
approaching the regulated navigation
area to announce intentions and work
out passing arrangements on either side.
(iv) Commercial tows transiting the
regulated navigation area must be made
up with wire rope to ensure electrical
connectivity between all segments of the
tow.
(v) All vessels are prohibited from
loitering between the Romeo Road
VerDate Nov<24>2008
11:25 Feb 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
Bridge (approximate mile marker
296.18) and mile marker 296.7 (aerial
pipeline located approximately 0.51
miles north east of Romeo Road Bridge).
(vi) Vessels may enter the waters
between the Romeo Road Bridge
(approximate mile marker 296.18) and
mile marker 296.7 (aerial pipeline
located approximately 0.51 miles north
east of Romeo Road Bridge) for the sole
purpose of transiting to the other side
and must maintain headway throughout
the transit. All vessels and persons are
prohibited from dredging, laying cable,
dragging, fishing, conducting salvage
operations, or any other activity, which
could disturb the bottom of the canal in
the area located between the Romeo
Road Bridge (approximate mile marker
296.18) and mile marker 296.7 (aerial
pipeline located approximately 0.51
miles north east of Romeo Road Bridge).
(vii) All personnel on open decks
must wear a Coast Guard approved Type
I personal flotation device while in the
waters between the Romeo Road Bridge
(approximate mile marker 296.18) and
mile marker 296.7 (aerial pipeline
located approximately 0.51 miles north
east of Romeo Road Bridge).
(viii) Vessels may not moor or lay up
on the right or left descending banks of
the waters between the Romeo Road
Bridge (approximate mile marker
296.18) and mile marker 296.7 (aerial
pipeline located approximately 0.51
miles north east of Romeo Road Bridge).
(ix) Towboats may not make or break
tows if any portion of the towboat or
tow is located in the waters between the
Romeo Road Bridge (approximate mile
marker 296.18) and mile marker 296.7
(aerial pipeline located approximately
0.51 miles north east of Romeo Road
Bridge).
(3) Compliance. All persons and
vessels must comply with this section
and any additional instructions or
orders of the Ninth Coast Guard District
Commander, or his designated
representatives.
(4) Waiver. For any vessel, the Ninth
Coast Guard District Commander, or his
designated representatives, may waive
any of the requirements of this section,
upon finding that operational
conditions or other circumstances are
such that application of this section is
unnecessary or impractical for the
purposes of vessel and mariner safety.
(b) Safety Zone. (1) The following area
is a safety zone: All waters of the
Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal
located between mile marker 296.0
(approximately 958 feet south of the
Romeo Road Bridge) and mile marker
296.7 (aerial pipeline located
approximately 0.51 miles north east of
Romeo Road Bridge).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6357
(2) Notice of enforcement or
suspension of enforcement. The Captain
of the Port Lake Michigan will enforce
the safety zone established by this
section only upon notice. Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan will cause notice of
the enforcement of this safety zone to be
made by all appropriate means to effect
the widest publicity among the affected
segments of the public including
publication in the Federal Register as
practicable, in accordance with 33 CFR
§ 165.7(a). Such means of notification
may also include but are not limited to,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners or Local
Notice to Mariners. The Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan will issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners and Local
Notice to Mariners notifying the public
when enforcement of these safety zones
is suspended.
(3) Regulations. (i) In accordance with
the general regulations in section 165.23
of this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan, or
his on-scene representative.
(ii) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan or his on-scene
representative.
(iii) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant or petty
officer who has been designated by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
The on-scene representative of the
Captain of the Port will be aboard either
a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary
vessel. The Captain of the Port or his onscene representative may be contacted
via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or his on-scene representative
to obtain permission to do so. Vessel
operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply
with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or his
on-scene representative.
Dated: January 16, 2009.
D.R. Callahan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Ninth Coast Guard District Acting.
[FR Doc. E9–2408 Filed 2–6–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 25 (Monday, February 9, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6352-6357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2408]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2008-1247]
RIN 1625-AA11
Regulated Navigation Area and Safety Zone, Chicago Sanitary and
Ship Canal, Romeoville, IL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary interim rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a regulated navigation area
and safety zone on the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal near Romeoville,
IL. This temporary interim rule places navigational and operational
restrictions on all vessels transiting the navigable waters located
adjacent to and over the Army Corps of Engineers' electrical dispersal
fish barrier system.
DATES: This temporary interim rule is effective from 11:59 p.m. on
January 17, 2009, until September 30, 2009. Comments and related
material must reach the Docket Management Facility on or before April
10, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2008-1247 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these methods. For instructions on submitting comments, see the
``Public Participation and Request for Comments''.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call CDR Tim Cummins, Deputy Prevention Division, Ninth
Coast Guard District, telephone 216-902-6045. If you have questions on
viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2008-1247), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online, or by fax, mail or hand delivery, but please use only one of
these means. We recommend that you
[[Page 6353]]
include your name and a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
select the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the
screen, insert ``USCG-2008-1247'' in the Docket ID box, press Enter,
and then click on the balloon shape in the Actions column. If you
submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change this rule
based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
select the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the
screen, insert USCG-2008-1247 in the Docket ID box, press Enter, and
then click on the item in the Docket ID column. You may also visit
either the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an agreement
with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket Management
Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that
one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary interim rule without
prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under
section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C.
553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without
prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause
finds that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because the
electric current in the water poses a safety risk to commercial and
recreational boaters who transit the area. Likewise, under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this
rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal
Register because of the safety risk to commercial and recreational
boaters who transit the area. The following discussion and the
Background and Purpose section below provides additional support of the
Coast Guard's determination that good causes exists for not publishing
a NPRM and for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication.
In 2002, the Army Corps of Engineers energized a demonstration
electrical dispersal barrier located in the Chicago Sanitary and Ship
Canal. The demonstration barrier, commonly referred to as ``Barrier
I,'' generates a low-voltage electric field (one-volt per inch) across
the canal, which connects the Illinois River to Lake Michigan. Barrier
I was built to block the passage of aquatic nuisance species, such as
Asian carp, and prevent them from moving between the Mississippi River
basin and Great Lakes via the canal. In 2006, the Army Corps completed
construction of a new barrier, ``Barrier IIA.'' Barrier IIA is designed
to operate continuously at one-volt per inch, and can operate at higher
levels. Barrier IIA is slated to undergo additional testing to
determine optimal operating levels. Because of its design, Barrier IIA
can generate a more powerful electric field, over a larger area within
the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, than Barrier I.
A comprehensive, independent analysis of Barrier IIA, conducted in
2008, at the one-volt per inch level, found a serious risk of injury or
death to persons immersed in the water located adjacent to and over the
barrier. Additionally, sparking between barges transiting the barrier
(a risk to flammable cargoes) occurred at the one-volt per inch level.
Operating Barrier IIA at four-volts per inch (the maximum capacity)
presents a higher risk; however, there is no data yet to indicate how
much higher. The Coast Guard and Army Corps developed regulations and
safety guidelines, with stakeholder input, which addressed the risks
and hazards associated with operating the barriers at the one-volt per
inch level. These regulations were published in 33 CFR 165.923, 70 FR
76692 (Dec 28, 2005) and in a series of temporary final rules: 71 FR
4488 (Jan 27, 2006); 71 FR 19648 (Apr 17, 2006); 73 FR 33337 (Jun 12,
2008); 73 FR 37810 (Jul 2, 2008); 73 FR 45875 (Aug 7, 2008); and 73 FR
63633 (Oct 27, 2008).
The Army Corps of Engineers recently notified the Coast Guard that
it plans to activate Barrier IIA on a full-time basis starting in
middle to late January 2009. Both Barrier IIA and Barrier I will
operate at the same time; hence, Barrier I will provide a redundant
back up to Barrier IIA.
The Coast Guard has advised the Army Corps of Engineers that it has
no objection to the Army Corps activating Barrier IIA at a maximum
strength of one-volt per inch, which is the operating strength of
Barrier I. In addition, the Coast Guard advised the Army Corps that it
does not object to the Army Corps' plans for additional testing of
Barrier IIA at peak field strength of up to four-volts per inch. Peak
field strength tests are necessary to evaluate safety risks to mariners
and their vessels when Barrier IIA is operated at a higher voltage.
To mitigate the safety risks created by operation of the barriers,
navigational and operational restrictions are necessary for all vessels
transiting through the navigable waters located adjacent to and over
the barriers. Specifically, and as discussed in more detail in the
Discussion of the Rule section below, the Coast Guard is establishing a
regulated navigation area, which requires vessels to adhere to
specified operational and navigational requirements while inside the
regulated navigation area. In addition, the Coast Guard will
occasionally enforce a safety zone, which prohibits the movement of all
vessels and persons through the electrical dispersal barriers during
tests of Barrier IIA at voltages higher than one-volt per inch.
Background and Purpose
The Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of
1990, as amended by the National Invasive Species Act of 1996,
authorized the Army Corps of Engineers to conduct a demonstration
project to identify an
[[Page 6354]]
environmentally sound method for preventing and reducing the dispersal
of non-indigenous aquatic nuisance species through the Chicago Sanitary
and Ship Canal. The Army Corps of Engineers selected an electric
barrier because it is a non-lethal deterrent with a proven history,
which does not overtly interfere with navigation in the canal.
A demonstration dispersal barrier (Barrier I) was constructed and
has been in operation since April 2002. It is located approximately 30
miles from Lake Michigan and creates an electric field in the water by
pulsing low voltage DC current through steel cables secured to the
bottom of the canal. A second barrier, Barrier IIA, was constructed 800
to 1300 feet downstream of the Barrier I. The potential field strength
for Barrier IIA will be up to four times that of the Barrier I. Barrier
IIA was successfully operated for the first time for approximately
seven weeks in September and October 2008, while Barrier I was taken
down for maintenance. Construction on a third barrier (Barrier IIB) is
planned; Barrier IIB would augment the capabilities of Barriers I and
IIA.
In the spring of 2004, a commercial towboat operator reported an
electrical arc between a wire rope and timberhead while making up a tow
in the vicinity of the Barrier I. During subsequent Army Corps of
Engineers safety testing in January 2005, sparking was observed upon
metal-to-metal contact between two independent barges in the barrier
field.
The electric current in the water poses a safety risk to commercial
and recreational boaters transiting the area. The Navy Experimental
Diving Unit (NEDU) was tasked with researching how the electric current
from the barriers would affect a human body if immersed in the water.
The NEDU final report concluded that the possible effects to a human
body if immersed in the water include paralysis of body muscles,
inability to breathe, and ventricular fibrillation.
A Safety Work Group facilitated by the Coast Guard and in
partnership with the Army Corps of Engineers and industry initially met
in February 2008 and focused on three goals: (1) Education and public
outreach, (2) keeping people out of the water, and (3) egress/rescue
efforts. The Safety Work Group has regularly been attended by eleven
stakeholders. Key partners include the American Waterways Operators,
Illinois River Carriers Association, Army Corps of Engineers Chicago
District, Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit Chicago, Coast Guard Sector
Lake Michigan/Captain of the Port Lake Michigan, and the Ninth Coast
Guard District. During the past twelve months, the Coast Guard has
hosted five Safety Work Group meetings with full participation from
stakeholders.
Based on the commercial significance and successful transit history
of the Barrier I by thousands of barges since its inception in April
2002, and Barrier IIA during Fall 2008, the Coast Guard has not chosen
to close the waterway despite the proven electrical discharge hazard
and additional safety concerns. Tows spanning Barrier IIA and the coal
fired power plant barge loading area just south of the RNA remain a
concern. Accordingly, because of the safety risks involved, it is
imperative that the Coast Guard implements increased safety measures
for the operation of both Barriers I and IIA.
In addition to this temporary interim rule, the Coast Guard intends
to publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). The NPRM will
propose establishing a permanent regulated navigation area and safety
zone that is identical to the regulated navigation area and safety zone
established by this temporary interim rule. We encourage the public to
participate in the rule proposed by our NPRM by submitting comments and
related materials to the docket. The NPRM will contain information on
how to submit comments and will be part of the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2008-1247). To view the NPRM, once published, as well
as documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the
docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov at any time, click on ``Search
for Dockets,'' and enter the docket number for this rulemaking (USCG-
2008-1247) in the Docket ID box, and click enter. You may also visit
the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of
the DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
Discussion of Rule
This temporary interim rule will suspend 33 CFR 165.923 and will
place additional restrictions on all vessels transiting through the
navigable waters located adjacent to and over the electrical dispersal
barriers located on the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal. The regulated
navigation area encompasses all waters of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship
Canal located between mile marker 295.0 (approximately 1.1 miles south
of the Romeo Road Bridge) and mile marker 297.5 (approximately 1.3
miles northeast of the Romeo Road Bridge). The requirements placed on
commercial vessels include: (1) Vessels engaged in commercial service,
as defined in 46 U.S.C. 2101(5), may not pass (meet or overtake) in the
regulated navigation area and must make a SECURITE call when
approaching the regulated navigation area to announce intentions and
work out passing arrangements on either side; (2) commercial tows
transiting the regulated navigation area must be made up with wire rope
to ensure electrical connectivity between all segments of the tow; and
(3) all up-bound and down-bound barge tows that contain one or more red
flag barges must be assisted by a bow boat until the entire tow is
clear of the regulated navigation area. Red flag barges are barges
certificated to carry, in bulk, any hazardous material as defined in 46
CFR Sec. 150.115. Currently, 46 CFR Sec. 150.115 defines hazardous
material as:
(a) A flammable liquid as defined in 46 CFR 30.10-22 or a
combustible liquid as defined in 46 CFR 30.10-15;
(b) A material listed in Table 151.05, Table 1 of part 153, or
Table 4 of part 154 of Title 46, CFR; or
(c) A liquid, liquefied gas, or compressed gas listed in 49 CFR
172.101.
The Army Corps of Engineers has informed the Coast Guard that the
Corps will continue to contract bow boat assistance for barge tows
containing one or more red flag barges. The Army Corps of Engineers has
also advised the Coast Guard that they have funds to contract bow boat
assistance through September 30, 2009. Operators of tows containing one
or more red flag barges should notify the bow boat contractor at least
two hours prior to the need for assistance. The tow operator should
then remain in contact with the contractor after the initial call for
bow boat assistance and advise the contractor of any delays.
Information on how to arrange for bow boat assistance may be obtained
by contacting the Army Corps of Engineers at 312-846-5333, during
normal working hours. The Coast Guard will also publish this
information in its Local Notice to Mariners.
This temporary interim rule places additional restrictions and
operating requirements on all vessels within a smaller portion of the
regulated navigation area, specifically, the waters between the Romeo
Road Bridge (approximate mile marker 296.18) and mile marker 296.7
(aerial pipeline located approximately 0.51 miles north east of Romeo
Road Bridge). Within this smaller area, this temporary interim rule
prohibits all vessels from loitering, mooring or laying up on the right
or left
[[Page 6355]]
descending banks, or making or breaking tows on the waters between the
Romeo Road Bridge (approximate mile marker 296.18) and mile marker
296.7 (aerial pipeline located approximately 0.51 miles north east of
Romeo Road Bridge). In addition, vessels may only enter the waters
between the Romeo Road Bridge (approximate mile marker 296.18) and mile
marker 296.7 (aerial pipeline located approximately 0.51 miles north
east of Romeo Road Bridge) for the sole purpose of transiting to the
other side and must maintain headway throughout the transit. All
vessels and persons are prohibited from dredging, laying cable,
dragging, fishing, conducting salvage operations, or any other
activity, which could disturb the bottom of the canal in the area
located between the Romeo Road Bridge (approximate mile marker 296.18)
and mile marker 296.7 (aerial pipeline located approximately 0.51 miles
north east of Romeo Road Bridge). The temporary interim rule also
requires all personnel on open decks to wear a Coast Guard approved
Type I personal flotation device while on the waters between the Romeo
Road Bridge (approximate mile marker 296.18) and mile marker 296.7
(aerial pipeline located approximately 0.51 miles north east of Romeo
Road Bridge).
These restrictions are necessary for safe navigation of the
regulated navigation area and to ensure the safety of vessels and their
personnel as well as the public's safety due to the electrical
discharges noted during safety tests conducted by the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers. Deviation from this temporary interim rule is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the Commander, Ninth Coast Guard
District or his designated representatives. The Commander, Ninth Coast
Guard District designates Captain of the Port Lake Michigan and
Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Unit Chicago, as his designated
representatives for the purposes of the regulated navigation area.
A safety zone will be enforced during tests of Barrier IIA at
voltages higher than one-volt per inch. This safety zone, which
encompasses all the waters of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal
located between mile marker 296.0 (approximately 958 feet south of the
Romeo Road Bridge) and mile marker 296.7 (aerial pipeline located
approximately 0.51 miles north east of Romeo Road Bridge), will be
enforced by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan, for such times
before, during, and after barrier testing as he or she deems necessary
to protect mariners and vessels from damage or injury. The Captain of
the Port Lake Michigan will cause notice of enforcement or suspension
of enforcement of this safety zone to be made by all appropriate means
to effect the widest publicity among the affected segments of the
public. Such means of notification will include, but is not limited to,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners and Local Notice to Mariners. The Captain
of the Port will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners notifying the
public when enforcement of the safety zone is suspended. In addition,
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan maintains a telephone line that is
manned 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The public can obtain
information concerning enforcement of the safety zone by contacting the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan via the Coast Guard Sector Lake
Michigan Command Center at (414) 747-7182.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. This determination is based
on the following: (1) Vessel traffic may continue to transit through
the regulated navigation area; (2) the Army Corps of Engineers intends
to pay the cost of the bow boat required by barge tows containing one
or more red flag barges during the time this rule is effective; (3) the
safety zone will only be enforced on an occasional basis; and (4)
vessels may request permission from the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan to transit through the safety zone when the safety zone is
enforced.
As discussed in the ``Regulatory Information'' section above, the
Coast Guard has established and enforced temporary safety zones, which
prohibited all vessels from entering the waters located over and
adjacent to the electric dispersal barriers during testing. During past
safety zone enforcement, the Coast Guard, in coordination with the Army
Corps of Engineers, provided advance notice of the waterway closure and
monitored vessel traffic during closure of the waterway. During these
prior tests, testing occurred during three, two-hour blocks of time. In
between these two-hour blocks of time, vessel traffic was granted
permission by the Captain of the Port to transit through the safety
zone.
Exact dates, times and duration of tests have not yet been
finalized by the Army Corps for testing Barrier IIA at peak field
strength. Nevertheless, the Coast Guard will coordinate with the Army
Corps and waterway users, as it has done during past testing.
Coordination efforts will include providing as much advance notice as
possible to waterway users of planned closures and working with the
Army Corps to structure testing dates, times and duration so as to
minimize delays to vessels that transit the area.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule would affect the following entities, some of which might
be small: The owners and operators of vessels intending to transit or
anchor in a portion of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal.
This regulated navigation area and safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons: (1) Vessel traffic may continue to transit
through the regulated navigation area; (2) the Army Corps of Engineers
intends to pay the cost of the bow boat required by barge tows
containing one or more red flag barges during the time this rule is
effective; (3) the safety zone will only be enforced on an occasional
basis; and (4) vessels may request permission from the Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan to transit through the safety zone when the safety
zone is enforced. The Coast Guard will give notice to the public, using
all appropriate means to effect the widest publicity among the affected
segments of the public, when the safety zone is enforced and when
enforcement is suspended.
[[Page 6356]]
As noted above, the Coast Guard intends to publish an NPRM and
specifically seek public comment as to a permanent regulated navigation
area and safety zone. The Coast Guard encourages public comment
regarding the potential economic impact of the regulated navigation
area and safety zone.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
The Coast Guard recognizes the treaty rights of Native American
Tribes. Moreover, the Coast Guard is committed to working with Tribal
Governments to implement local policies and to mitigate tribal
concerns. We have determined that these regulations and fishing rights
protection need not be incompatible. We have also determined that this
rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because
it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Nevertheless, Indian Tribes
that have questions concerning the provisions of this rule or options
for compliance are encouraged to contact the point of contact listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that this action is one of the category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
section 2.B.2 Figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction and
neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact
statement is required. This rule involves the establishing,
disestablishing, or changing of regulated navigation areas and security
or safety zones. An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
[[Page 6357]]
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
Sec. 165.923 [Suspended]
0
2. Section 165.923 is suspended from January 18, 2009 until September
30, 2009.
0
3. A new temporary Sec. 165.T09-1247 is added as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-1247 Regulated Navigation Area and Safety Zone, Chicago
Sanitary and Ship Canal, Romeoville, IL.
(a) Regulated Navigation Area. The following is a Regulated
Navigation Area: All waters of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal,
Romeoville, IL located between mile marker 295.0 (approximately 1.1
miles south of the Romeo Road Bridge) and mile marker 297.5
(approximately 1.3 miles northeast of the Romeo Road Bridge).
(1) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
Designated representatives means the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan and Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Unit Chicago.
Red flag barge means any barge certificated to carry any hazardous
material in bulk.
Hazardous material means any material as defined in 46 CFR 150.115.
Bow boat means a towing vessel capable of providing positive
control of the bow of a tow containing one or more barges, while
transiting the regulated navigation area. The bow boat must be capable
of preventing a tow containing one or more barges from coming into
contact with the shore and other moored vessels.
(2) Regulations. (i) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR
165.13 apply.
(ii) All up-bound and down-bound barge tows that contain one or
more red flag barges transiting through the regulated navigation area
must be assisted by a bow boat until the entire tow is clear of the
regulated navigation area.
(iii) Vessels engaged in commercial service, as defined in 46
U.S.C. 2101(5), may not pass (meet or overtake) in the regulated
navigation area and must make a SECURITE call when approaching the
regulated navigation area to announce intentions and work out passing
arrangements on either side.
(iv) Commercial tows transiting the regulated navigation area must
be made up with wire rope to ensure electrical connectivity between all
segments of the tow.
(v) All vessels are prohibited from loitering between the Romeo
Road Bridge (approximate mile marker 296.18) and mile marker 296.7
(aerial pipeline located approximately 0.51 miles north east of Romeo
Road Bridge).
(vi) Vessels may enter the waters between the Romeo Road Bridge
(approximate mile marker 296.18) and mile marker 296.7 (aerial pipeline
located approximately 0.51 miles north east of Romeo Road Bridge) for
the sole purpose of transiting to the other side and must maintain
headway throughout the transit. All vessels and persons are prohibited
from dredging, laying cable, dragging, fishing, conducting salvage
operations, or any other activity, which could disturb the bottom of
the canal in the area located between the Romeo Road Bridge
(approximate mile marker 296.18) and mile marker 296.7 (aerial pipeline
located approximately 0.51 miles north east of Romeo Road Bridge).
(vii) All personnel on open decks must wear a Coast Guard approved
Type I personal flotation device while in the waters between the Romeo
Road Bridge (approximate mile marker 296.18) and mile marker 296.7
(aerial pipeline located approximately 0.51 miles north east of Romeo
Road Bridge).
(viii) Vessels may not moor or lay up on the right or left
descending banks of the waters between the Romeo Road Bridge
(approximate mile marker 296.18) and mile marker 296.7 (aerial pipeline
located approximately 0.51 miles north east of Romeo Road Bridge).
(ix) Towboats may not make or break tows if any portion of the
towboat or tow is located in the waters between the Romeo Road Bridge
(approximate mile marker 296.18) and mile marker 296.7 (aerial pipeline
located approximately 0.51 miles north east of Romeo Road Bridge).
(3) Compliance. All persons and vessels must comply with this
section and any additional instructions or orders of the Ninth Coast
Guard District Commander, or his designated representatives.
(4) Waiver. For any vessel, the Ninth Coast Guard District
Commander, or his designated representatives, may waive any of the
requirements of this section, upon finding that operational conditions
or other circumstances are such that application of this section is
unnecessary or impractical for the purposes of vessel and mariner
safety.
(b) Safety Zone. (1) The following area is a safety zone: All
waters of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal located between mile
marker 296.0 (approximately 958 feet south of the Romeo Road Bridge)
and mile marker 296.7 (aerial pipeline located approximately 0.51 miles
north east of Romeo Road Bridge).
(2) Notice of enforcement or suspension of enforcement. The Captain
of the Port Lake Michigan will enforce the safety zone established by
this section only upon notice. Captain of the Port Lake Michigan will
cause notice of the enforcement of this safety zone to be made by all
appropriate means to effect the widest publicity among the affected
segments of the public including publication in the Federal Register as
practicable, in accordance with 33 CFR Sec. 165.7(a). Such means of
notification may also include but are not limited to, Broadcast Notice
to Mariners or Local Notice to Mariners. The Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners and Local Notice to
Mariners notifying the public when enforcement of these safety zones is
suspended.
(3) Regulations. (i) In accordance with the general regulations in
section 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port Lake Michigan, or his on-scene representative.
(ii) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as
may be permitted by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or his on-
scene representative.
(iii) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf. The on-
scene representative of the Captain of the Port will be aboard either a
Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The Captain of the Port or
his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or his on-
scene representative to obtain permission to do so. Vessel operators
given permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must comply
with all directions given to them by the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or his on-scene representative.
Dated: January 16, 2009.
D.R. Callahan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Ninth Coast Guard District
Acting.
[FR Doc. E9-2408 Filed 2-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P