Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Space Vehicle and Test Flight Activities from Vandenberg Air Force Base (VAFB), California, 6236-6244 [E9-2582]
Download as PDF
6236
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 24 / Friday, February 6, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
filed by Sprint against Chesapeake,
Virginia, and Chester County,
Pennsylvania, as applications for review
for purposes of resolving questions of
law, and the Commission allowed the
parties to file oppositions and replies as
provided under the Commission’s
application for review procedures.
Third, the Commission denied a
petition for reconsideration that alleges
that the Commission’s Public Notice
released on September 12, 2007, 72 FR
55208, September 28, 2007, to expedite
the rebanding process imposed
unreasonable new regulatory burdens
on 800 MHz licensees. Finally, the
Commission delegated authority to the
Public Safety and Homeland Security
Bureau (PSHSB or Bureau) to develop a
rebanding plan for the U.S. Virgin
Islands based on a proposal submitted
by the TA.
Procedural Matters
A. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis required by section 604 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 604,
is included in Appendix A of the Fourth
Memorandum Opinion and Order.
B. Final Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 Analysis
The Fourth Memorandum Opinion
and Order does not contain new or
modified information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public
Law 104–13. In addition, therefore it
does not contain any new or modified
‘‘information burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25
employees,’’ pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198.
established by the Small Business
Administration (SBA). Consistent with
what we describe below, we certify that
the actions in this Fourth Memorandum
Opinion and Order will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Because the Commission’s decision is
limited to reporting requirements
applicable to Sprint and the TA and
affects no other entity, and because the
Commission’s decision concerning
Sprint merely extends the status quo,
the Commission certifies that its
decision will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. All other
issues do not raise regulatory flexibility
issues because the Commission’s actions
deny petitions for reconsideration, defer
action on certain petitions for de novo
review and afford certain parties an
opportunity to file oppositions and
replies as provided under our
application for review procedures, or
internally delegate authority, and
therefore do not raise any regulatory
flexibility issues. The Commission will
send a copy of the Fourth Memorandum
Opinion and Order, including a copy of
this Final Regulatory Flexibility
Certification, to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the SBA, and will be
published in the Federal Register.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–2568 Filed 2–5–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, as amended (RFA), requires that a
regulatory flexibility analysis be
prepared for notice-and-comment
rulemaking proceedings, unless the
agency certifies that ‘‘the rule will not,
if promulgated, have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.’’ The RFA
generally defines the term ‘‘small
entity’’ as having the same meaning as
the terms ‘‘small business,’’ ‘‘small
organization,’’ and ‘‘small governmental
jurisdiction.’’ In addition, the term
‘‘small business’’ has the same meaning
as the term ‘‘small business concern’’
under the Small Business Act. A ‘‘small
business concern’’ is one which: (1) Is
independently owned and operated; (2)
is not dominant in its field of operation;
and (3) satisfies any additional criteria
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:50 Feb 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
50 CFR Part 216
[Docket No. 0808041027–9041–02]
RIN 0648–AX08
Taking and Importing Marine
Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to Space Vehicle and Test
Flight Activities from Vandenberg Air
Force Base (VAFB), California
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: NMFS, upon application from
the U.S. Air Force (USAF), is issuing
regulations to govern the unintentional
taking of marine mammals, by
harassment, incidental to launching
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
space launch vehicles, intercontinental
ballistic and small missiles, and aircraft
and helicopter operations at VAFB for
the period February 2009 through
February 2014. The USAF’s activities
are considered military readiness
activities pursuant to the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), as
amended by the National Defense
Authorization Act of 2004 (NDAA).
These regulations, which allow for the
issuance of ‘‘Letters of Authorization’’
(LOAs) for the incidental take of marine
mammals during the described activities
and specified time frames, prescribe the
permissible methods of taking and other
means of effecting the least practicable
adverse impact on marine mammal
species and their habitat, as well as
requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such taking.
DATES: Effective February 7, 2009,
through February 7, 2014.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the USAF’s
application, which contains a list of
references used in this document, and
NMFS’ Final Environmental Assessment
(EA) and Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) may be obtained by
writing to P. Michael Payne, Chief,
Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resource,
National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3225, by telephoning the contact
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, or on the Internet at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm#applications.
Documents cited in this final rule may
also be viewed, by appointment, during
regular business hours at the above
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Candace Nachman, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 713–2289, ext.
156, or Monica DeAngelis, Southwest
Regional Office, NMFS, (562) 980–3232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary)
to allow, upon request, the incidental,
but not intentional taking of small
numbers of marine mammals by U.S.
citizens who engage in a specified
activity (other than commercial fishing)
within a specified geographical region if
certain findings are made and either
regulations are issued or, if the taking is
limited to harassment, notice of a
proposed authorization is provided to
the public for review.
Authorization for incidental takings
may be granted if NMFS finds that the
taking will have a negligible impact on
E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM
06FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 24 / Friday, February 6, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
the species or stock(s), will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
certain subsistence uses, and that the
permissible methods of taking and
requirements pertaining to the
mitigation, monitoring and reporting of
such taking are set forth.
NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as:
an impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably expected
to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.
The NDAA (Public Law 108–136)
removed the ‘‘small numbers’’ and
‘‘specified geographical region’’
limitations and amended the definition
of ‘‘harassment’’ as it applies to a
‘‘military readiness activity’’ to read as
follows (Section 3(18)(B) of the MMPA):
(i) any act that injures or has the significant
potential to injure a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild [Level A
Harassment]; or (ii) any act that disturbs or
is likely to disturb a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of natural behavioral patterns,
including, but not limited to, migration,
surfacing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering, to a point where such behavioral
patterns are abandoned or significantly
altered [Level B Harassment].
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Summary of Request
On March 21, 2008, NMFS received
an application from the USAF
requesting authorization for the take of
four species of marine mammals
incidental to space vehicle and test
flight activities from VAFB, which
would impact pinnipeds on VAFB and
the Northern Channel Islands (NCI).
These training activities are classified as
military readiness activities. Marine
mammals may be exposed to continuous
noise due mostly to combustion effects
of aircraft and launch vehicles and
impulsive noise due to sonic boom
effects. The USAF requested
authorization to take four pinniped
species by Level B Harassment.
Description of the Specified Activity
VAFB (see Figure 1 in the USAF
application) is headquarters to the 30th
Space Wing (SW), the Air Force Space
Command unit that operates VAFB and
the Western Range. VAFB operates as a
missile test base and aerospace center,
supporting west coast space launch
activities for the USAF, Department of
Defense, National Aeronautics and
Space Administration, and commercial
contractors. VAFB is the main west
coast launch facility for placing
commercial, government, and military
satellites into polar orbit on expendable
(unmanned) launch vehicles, and for
testing and evaluation of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:50 Feb 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
intercontinental ballistic missiles
(ICBM) and sub-orbital target and
interceptor missiles. In addition to
space vehicle and missile launch
activities at VAFB, there are helicopter
and aircraft operations for purposes
such as search-and-rescue, delivery of
space vehicle components, launch
mission support, and security
reconnaissance. The USAF expects to
launch a maximum of 30 rockets and
missiles per year from VAFB.
There are currently six active space
launch vehicle (SLV) facilities at VAFB
(VAFB, 2007), used to launch satellites
into polar orbit. These facilities support
the launch programs for space vehicles
including the Atlas V, Delta II, Delta IV,
Falcon, Minotaur, and Taurus. The
Falcon has yet to launch from VAFB
and is scheduled for its first launch in
August, 2009 (30 SW, 2008a). A detailed
description of the activities to be
conducted by the USAF, including
vehicle types and the sound exposure
levels produced by each missile or
rocket and aircraft operations, was
included in the proposed rule (73 FR
77577, December 19, 2008) and may
also be found in the USAF’s application
(see ADDRESSES).
Description of Marine Mammals
Potentially Affected by the Activity and
Habitat
The four species of marine mammals
most likely to be present in the action
area are: Pacific harbor seals (Phoca
vitulina richardii); California sea lions
(Zalophus californianus); northern
elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris);
and northern fur seals (Callorhinus
ursinus). Guadalupe fur seals
(Arctocephalus townsendi) and Steller
sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) have
bred in the past on San Miguel Island,
but sightings have been rare since the
mid-1980’s.
The USAF has compiled information
on the abundance, status, and
distribution of the species on VAFB and
the NCI from surveys that they have
conducted over the last decade and from
NMFS Stock Assessment Reports
(SARs). This information may be viewed
in the USAF’s application (see
ADDRESSES). Additional information is
available in the NMFS SARs, which are
available at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/pdfs/sars/po2007.pdf.
The proposed rule (73 FR 77577,
December 19, 2008) contained a detailed
description of the distribution of these
species on VAFB and the NCI, as well
as a description of their habitat.
Comments and Responses
On July 25, 2008, NMFS published a
notice of receipt of application for an
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6237
LOA in the Federal Register (73 FR
43410) and requested comments and
information from the public for 30 days.
During that comment period, NMFS
received comments from the Marine
Mammal Commission (Commission)
and one private citizen. Responses to
those comments are addressed in the
proposed rule Federal Register notice
(73 FR 77577, December 19, 2008). On
December 19, 2008, NMFS published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (73 FR
77577) on the USAF’s request to take
marine mammals incidental to space
vehicle and test flight activities from
VAFB and requested comments,
information, and suggestions concerning
the request. During the 15-day public
comment period, NMFS received
comments from the Commission and
one private citizen. The comment from
the private citizen opposed the issuance
of an authorization without any specific
substantiation for why such an
authorization should not be issued. For
the reasons set forth in this preamble,
NMFS believes issuance of the
authorization is appropriate. Following
are the comments from the Commission
and NMFS’ responses.
Comment 1: The Commission
recommends that NMFS extend the
public comment period on the proposed
rule for at least an additional 15 days,
or, alternatively, provide a postpromulgation comment period before
the effective date of the rule.
Response: NMFS has been issuing
MMPA authorizations to the USAF to
conduct these activities from VAFB for
more than 20 years, which has allowed
NMFS to develop relatively standard
mitigation and monitoring requirements
for these activities, so rarely more than
one or two public comments are
received. The public was afforded a 30day comment period to submit
information and suggestions on the
preparation of proposed regulations
beginning on July 25, 2008 with the
publication of the notice of receipt of
application (73 FR 43410). NMFS
received only two comment letters at
that time. Similarly, the same two
organizations or members of the public
commented on the proposed rule.
NMFS did not receive any other
requests to extend the comment period.
The last time NMFS developed
regulations for the USAF to conduct
these same activities, NMFS published
a notice of receipt of application (68 FR
54894, September 19, 2003), which
allowed for a 30-day comment period
and a notice of proposed rulemaking (68
FR 67629, December 3, 2003), which
allowed for a 15-day comment period.
With only slight changes to some of the
launch vehicles or missiles to be used,
E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM
06FER1
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
6238
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 24 / Friday, February 6, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
the activities to be authorized for the
period of February 2009 to February
2014 and therefore the mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements
are nearly identical to those required in
the February 2004 to February 2009
regulations. In 2003, only the
Commission submitted comments on
the proposed rulemaking. There has not
been a great deal of public interest in
the MMPA authorization process for
these activities currently or in the past.
Therefore, NMFS does not believe it is
necessary to extend the comment period
for this action.
NMFS will not be able to provide a
post-promulgation comment period. The
current regulations are set to expire on
February 6, 2009. The USAF currently
has a launch planned for February 23,
2009. Since these launches are planned
around certain meteorological, as well
as other, conditions, it is not practical
to have a post-promulgation comment
period. These launches are important to
national security.
Comment 2: The Commission
recommends that NMFS issue the final
rule as proposed, provided that the
mitigation and monitoring activities
described in the USAF application and
the proposed rule Federal Register
notice (73 FR 77577, December 19,
2008) are incorporated into the final
rule.
Response: NMFS agrees with the
Commission’s recommendation. All
measures contained in the proposed
rulemaking Federal Register notice are
included in the final rule.
Comment 3: The Commission also
recommends that NMFS specify in the
final rule that the authorized activities
shall be suspended, pending review, if
there is any indication that the activities
covered by the rule are causing marine
mammal mortalities or injuries or are
affecting the distribution, size, or
productivity of the potentially affected
populations.
Response: The activities to be
authorized are considered military
readiness activities and are important to
national security. The USAF launches
several different types of vehicles and
missiles from many different space
launch complexes on VAFB, sometimes
only a few days apart. Therefore, it
would be impractical to suspend all
activities. The proposed rule (73 FR
77577, December 19, 2008) contained a
condition in the ‘‘Mitigation’’ section
that, for the most part, addressed the
Commission’s recommendation.
Language has been added to that
condition to expand its coverage to
include possible affects to distribution,
size, and productivity of the potentially
affected pinniped populations. Based on
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:50 Feb 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
the Commission’s recommendation,
NMFS has included the following
condition in the final rule:
If post-launch surveys determine that an
injurious or lethal take of a marine mammal
has occurred or there is an indication that the
distribution, size, or productivity of the
potentially affected pinniped populations has
been affected, the launch procedure and the
monitoring methods must be reviewed, in
cooperation with NMFS, and, if necessary,
appropriate changes must be made through
modification to an LOA, prior to conducting
the next launch of the same vehicle under
that LOA.
Comment 4: The Commission
recommends that NMFS require
additional acoustic and biological
monitoring when new space vehicles or
missiles are launched to verify that the
actual sound levels and responses of
animals are as predicted.
Response: Both the monitoring plan
contained in the USAF’s application
and the ‘‘Monitoring’’ section in the
proposed rule Federal Register notice
(73 FR 77577, December 19, 2008)
contained a requirement that acoustic
and biological monitoring be conducted
on new space and missile launch
vehicles during at least the first launch,
whether it occurs within the pupping
season or not. This condition is
included in the final rule.
Comment 5: Lastly, the Commission
recommends that NMFS require
additional public notice and
opportunity for comment before
authorizing the taking of marine
mammals by any new space vehicles or
missiles that produce sound levels or
frequencies significantly different from
those described in this authorization.
Response: As described in the USAF’s
application, the proposed rule, and
NMFS’ EA, the specific launch vehicles
may change over the course of the fiveyear regulations (2009–2014) as NEPA
analyses are completed. This Federal
Register document and NMFS’ EA
evaluate the proposed level of activity
and type of launches based on current
and projected information. To the extent
that specific launch vehicles may
change, the USAF would be required to
report such new vehicles to NMFS, and
NMFS would evaluate a particular
vehicle (e.g., missiles) to ensure that the
vehicle fit within the parameters of the
regulations. Thus, the transition of
individual craft is not expected to
change the impact assessment as set
forth in NMFS’ EA, and all activities
would be required to fall within the
general description of specified
activities and estimates of marine
mammal take described in this
document and NMFS’ EA. If it is
determined that the new space vehicles
or missiles will produce sound levels or
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
frequencies significantly different from
those described in this authorization,
then NMFS will make the information
available to the public for comment.
Potential Effects of Specified Activities
on Marine Mammals
The activities under these regulations
create two types of noise: Continuous
(but short-duration) noise, due mostly to
combustion effects of aircraft and
launch vehicles; and impulsive noise,
due to sonic boom effects. Launch
operations are the major source of noise
on the marine environment from VAFB.
The operation of launch vehicle engines
produces significant sound levels.
Generally, noise is generated from four
sources during launches: (1)
Combustion noise from launch vehicle
chambers; (2) jet noise generated by the
interaction of the exhaust jet and the
atmosphere; (3) combustion noise from
the post-burning of combustion
products; and (4) sonic booms. Launch
noise levels are highly dependent on the
type of first-stage booster and the fuel
used to propel the vehicle. Therefore,
there is a great similarity in launch
noise production within each class size
of launch vehicles.
The noise generated by VAFB
activities will result in the incidental
harassment of pinnipeds, both
behaviorally and in terms of
physiological (auditory) impacts. The
noise and visual disturbances from SLV
and missile launches and aircraft and
helicopter operations may cause the
animals to lift their heads, move
towards the water, or enter the water.
Information on marine mammal
responses to launch noise that has been
gathered under previous LOAs for these
activities, as well as a scientific research
permit issued to VAFB by NMFS for a
research program (Permit No. 859–
1680–01) to determine the short and
long-term effects of SLV noise and sonic
booms on affected marine mammals is
contained in the USAF’s application
and the proposed rulemaking Federal
Register notice (73 FR 77577, December
19, 2008). The potential effects
described in the proposed rule are the
same as those that would occur under
the final rule.
NMFS does not anticipate a
significant impact on any of the species
or stocks of marine mammals from
launches from VAFB. For even the
largest launch vehicles, such as Delta
IV, the launch noises and sonic booms
can be expected to cause a startle
response and flight to water for those
harbor seals, California sea lions and
other pinnipeds that are hauled out on
the coastline of VAFB and on the NCI.
The noise may cause temporary
E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM
06FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 24 / Friday, February 6, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
threshold shift (TTS) in hearing
depending on exposure levels, but no
permanent threshold shift is
anticipated. NMFS does not expect
these activities to result in the mortality
of any marine mammals.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Numbers of Marine Mammals
Estimated to be Taken by Harassment
The marine mammal species NMFS
believes likely to be taken by Level B
harassment incidental to launch and
aircraft and helicopter operations at
VAFB are harbor seals, California sea
lions, northern elephant seals, and
northern fur seals. All of these species
are protected under the MMPA, and
none are listed under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA). Numbers of animals
that may be taken by Level B
harassment are expected to vary due to
factors such as type of SLV, location of
the sonic boom, weather conditions
(which can influence the size of the
sonic boom), the time of day, and the
time of year. For this reason, ranges are
given for the harassment estimates of
marine mammals. Aircraft operations
will occur frequently but will avoid
pinniped haul-out areas and are
unlikely to disturb pinnipeds.
As noted earlier and in the proposed
rule (73 FR 77577, December 19, 2008),
sightings of Steller sea lions and
Guadalupe fur seals have been
extremely rare the last few decades or
low at VAFB and on the NCI. Therefore,
no takes by harassment are anticipated
for either of these species incidental to
the USAF’s activities.
Estimated Takes at VAFB
Harbor seals: As many as 600 harbor
seals per launch may be taken.
Depending on the type of rocket being
launched, the time of day, time of the
year, weather conditions, tide and swell
conditions, the number of seals that may
be taken will range between 0 and 600.
Launches and aircraft operations may
occur at any time of the year so any age
classes and gender may be taken.
California sea lions: As many as 200
sea lions per launch may be taken. Sea
lions at VAFB are usually juveniles of
both sexes and sub-adult males that
haul out in the fall during the post
breeding dispersal. Births generally do
not occur at VAFB, but five pups were
observed at VAFB in 2003, an El Nino
year, although all were abandoned by
their mothers and died within several
days of birth. Sick or emaciated weaned
pups may also haul out briefly. The
number of sea lions that may be taken
will range between 0 and 200.
Northern elephant seals: As many as
200 elephant seals per launch may be
taken. Weaned elephant seal pups,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:50 Feb 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
juveniles, or young adults of both sexes,
may occasionally haul out at VAFB for
several days to rest or as long as 30 days
to molt. Injured or sick seals may also
haul out briefly. The number of
northern elephant seals that may be
taken will range between 0 and 200.
Northern fur seals: There are no
reports of northern fur seals at VAFB.
Therefore, it is unlikely that any fur
seals will be taken.
Estimated Takes on the NCI
Sonic booms created by SLVs may
impact marine mammals on the NCI,
particularly SMI. Missile launches
utilize westward trajectories so do not
cause sonic boom impacts to the NCI.
The PCBoom sonic boom modeling
program will continue to be used to
predict the area of sonic boom impact
and magnitude of the sonic boom on the
NCI based on the launch vehicle, speed,
trajectory, and meteorological
conditions. Prior to each SLV launch, a
predictive sonic boom map of the
impact area and magnitude of the sonic
boom will be generated. Based on
previous monitoring of sonic booms
created by SLVs on SMI (Thorson et al.,
1999a: 1999b), it is estimated that as
much as approximately 25 percent of
the marine mammals may be disturbed
on SMI (Thorson et al., 1999a; 1999b).
Most sonic booms that reach SMI are
small (<1 pound per square foot [psf]),
although larger sonic booms are
possible, but rarely occur. A
conservative take estimate of as much as
25 percent of the animals present is
used for each species per launch.
Harbor seals: As many as 200 harbor
seals of all age classes and sexes may be
taken per launch on the NCI. The
number of harbor seals that may be
taken will range between 0 and 200.
California sea lions: As many as 5,800
sea lion pups and 2,500 juvenile and
adult sea lions of either sex may be
taken on the NCI per launch. The
number of sea lions that may be taken
will range between 0 and 8,300.
Northern elephant seals: As many as
3,000 northern elephant seal pups and
10,000 northern elephant seals of all age
classes and sexes may be taken per
launch on the NCI. The number of
elephant seals that may be taken will
range between 0 and 13,000.
Northern fur seals: As many as 300
northern fur seal pups and 1,100
juvenile and adult northern fur seals of
both sexes may be taken per launch at
SMI. The number of fur seals that may
be taken will range between 0 and
1,400.
With the incorporation of mitigation
measures proposed later in this
document, the USAF and NMFS expect
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6239
that only Level B incidental harassment
may occur as a result of the proposed
activities and that these events will
result in no detectable impact on marine
mammal species or stocks or on their
habitats.
Potential Effects of Specified Activities
on Marine Mammal Habitat
Impacts on marine mammal habitat
are part of the consideration in making
a finding of negligible impact on the
species and stocks of marine mammals.
Habitat includes, but is not necessarily
limited to, rookeries, mating grounds,
feeding areas, and areas of similar
significance. Only short-term
disturbance of marine mammals is
expected as a result of the proposed
activities. No impacts to marine
mammal habitats are anticipated on
VAFB or the NCI.
Potential Effects of Specified Activities
on Subsistence Needs
NMFS has determined that the
issuance of an LOA for USAF space
vehicle and missile launches and
aircraft and helicopter operations at
VAFB would not have an unmitigable
adverse impact on the availability of the
affected species or stocks for subsistence
use since there are no such uses for
these pinniped species in California.
Mitigation
To minimize impacts on pinnipeds on
beach haul-out sites and to avoid any
possible sensitizing or predisposing of
pinnipeds to greater responsiveness
towards the sights and sounds of a
launch, the USAF has prepared the
following mitigation measures, which
NMFS has incorporated into its
regulations.
All aircraft and helicopter flight paths
must maintain a minimum distance of
1,000 ft (305 m) from recognized seal
haul-outs and rookeries (e.g., Point Sal,
Purisima Point, Rocky Point), except in
emergencies or for real-time security
incidents (e.g., search-and-rescue, firefighting) which may require
approaching pinniped haul-outs and
rookeries closer than 1,000 ft (305 m).
For missile and rocket launches, unless
constrained by other factors including,
but not limited to, human safety,
national security concerns or launch
trajectories, holders of LOAs must
schedule launches to avoid, whenever
possible, launches during the harbor
seal pupping season of March through
June. NMFS has expanded this
requirement so that the USAF must
avoid, whenever possible, launches
which are predicted to produce a sonic
boom on the NCI during harbor seal,
E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM
06FER1
6240
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 24 / Friday, February 6, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
elephant seal, California sea lion, and
northern fur seal pupping seasons.
If post-launch surveys determine that
an injurious or lethal take of a marine
mammal has occurred or there is an
indication that the distribution, size, or
productivity of the potentially affected
pinniped populations has been affected,
the launch procedure and the
monitoring methods must be reviewed,
in cooperation with NMFS, and, if
necessary, appropriate changes must be
made through modification to an LOA,
prior to conducting the next launch of
the same vehicle under that LOA.
Monitoring
As part of its application, the USAF
provided a monitoring plan, similar to
that in the regulations (50 CFR 216.125)
set to expire on February 6, 2009, for
assessing impacts to marine mammals
from rocket and missile launches at
VAFB. This monitoring plan is
described, in detail, in their application
(30 SW, 2008c). The USAF will conduct
the following monitoring under the
regulations.
The monitoring will be conducted by
a NMFS-approved marine mammal
biologist experienced in surveying large
numbers of marine mammals.
Monitoring at the haul-out site closest to
the launch facility will commence at
least 72 hours prior to the launch and
continue until at least 48 hours after the
launch.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Monitoring for VAFB
Biological monitoring at VAFB will be
conducted for all launches during the
harbor seal pupping season, 1 March to
30 June. Acoustic and biological
monitoring will be conducted on new
space and missile launch vehicles
during at least the first launch, whether
it occurs within the pupping season or
not. Also, the third Delta IV launch will
be monitored, and Auditory Brainstem
Response (ABR) testing of seals in close
proximity to the launch is planned. The
testing will be authorized under a
scientific research permit issued under
Section 104 of the MMPA. Such work
was most recently conducted under
Permit No. 859–1680–01, which expired
on January 1, 2009. The USAF has
submitted an application to NMFS for
issuance of a new scientific research
permit to continue the ABR tests on
harbor seals, as well as other research
projects. NMFS is currently reviewing
this application. If appropriate, NMFS
will issue a new scientific research
permit to the USAF in early spring
2009. NMFS estimates that the tests
would be conducted during years 2–5 of
the regulations.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:50 Feb 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
Monitoring will include multiple
surveys each day that record, when
possible, the species, number of
animals, general behavior, presence of
pups, age class, gender, and reaction to
launch noise, sonic booms, or other
natural or human-caused disturbances.
Environmental conditions such as tide,
wind speed, air temperature, and swell
will also be recorded. Time-lapse
photography or video will be used
during daylight launches to document
the behavior of mother-pup pairs during
launch activities. For launches during
the harbor seal pupping season (March
through June), follow-up surveys will be
made within 2 weeks of the launch to
ensure that there were no adverse effects
on any marine mammals. A report
detailing the species, number of animals
observed, behavior, reaction to the
launch noise, time to return to the haulout site, any adverse behavior and
environmental conditions will be
submitted to NMFS within 90 days of
the launch.
Monitoring for the NCI
Monitoring will be conducted on the
NCI (San Miguel, Santa Cruz, and Santa
Rosa Islands) whenever a sonic boom
over 1 psf is predicted (using the most
current sonic boom modeling programs)
to impact one of the Islands. Monitoring
will be conducted at the haul-out site
closest to the predicted sonic boom
impact area. Monitoring will be
conducted by a NMFS-approved marine
mammal biologist experienced in
surveying large numbers of marine
mammals. Monitoring will commence at
least 72 hours prior to the launch and
continue until at least 48 hours after the
launch.
Monitoring will include multiple
surveys each day that record the
species, number of animals, general
behavior, presence of pups, age class,
gender, and reaction to launch noise,
sonic booms, or other natural or humancaused disturbances. Environmental
conditions such as tide, wind speed, air
temperature, and swell will also be
recorded. Due to the large numbers of
pinnipeds found on some beaches of
SMI, smaller focal groups should be
monitored in detail rather than the
entire beach population. A general
estimate of the entire beach population
should be made once a day and their
reaction to the launch noise noted.
Photography or video will be used
during daylight launches to document
the behavior of mother-pup pairs or
dependent pups during launch
activities. During the pupping season of
any species affected by a launch, followup surveys will be made within 2 weeks
of the launch to ensure that there were
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
no adverse effects on any marine
mammals. A report detailing the
species, number of animals observed,
behavior, reaction to the launch noise,
time to return to the haul-out site, any
adverse behavior and environmental
conditions will be submitted to NMFS
within 90 days of the launch.
Reporting
A report containing the following
information must be submitted to NMFS
within 90 days after each launch: (1)
Date(s) and time(s) of each launch; (2)
date(s), location(s), and preliminary
findings of any research activities
related to monitoring the effects on
launch noise and sonic booms on
marine mammal populations; and (3)
results of the monitoring programs,
including but not necessarily limited to
(a) numbers of pinnipeds present on the
haul-out prior to commencement of the
launch, (b) numbers of pinnipeds that
may have been harassed as noted by the
number of pinnipeds estimated to have
entered the water as a result of launch
noise, (c) the length of time(s) pinnipeds
remained off the haul-out or rookery, (d)
the numbers of pinniped adults or pups
that may have been injured or killed as
a result of the launch; and (4) any
behavioral modifications by pinnipeds
that likely were the result of launch
noise or the sonic boom.
If a freshly dead or seriously injured
pinniped is found during post-launch
monitoring, the incident must be
reported within 48 hours to the NMFS
Office of Protected Resources and the
NMFS Southwest Regional Office.
An annual report must be submitted
to NMFS at the time of renewal of the
LOA described in § 216.127, that
describes any incidental takings under
an LOA not reported in the 90-day
launch reports, such as the aircraft test
program and helicopter operations and
any assessments made of their impacts
on hauled-out pinnipeds.
A final report must be submitted to
NMFS no later than 180 days prior to
expiration of these regulations. This
report must summarize the findings
made in all previous reports and assess
both the impacts at each of the major
rookeries and the cumulative impact on
pinnipeds and any other marine
mammals from Vandenberg activities.
ESA
In December, 2003, NMFS determined
that the USAF’s activities and the
promulgation of regulations and
issuance of LOAs are not likely to
adversely affect any species or their
habitats that are listed as threatened or
endangered under the ESA. The
activities to be authorized under these
E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM
06FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 24 / Friday, February 6, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
regulations are not substantially
different from those described in the
2003 consultation. Therefore, there has
not been a reinitiation of consultation
under section 7 of the ESA since none
of the reinitiation triggers have been
met.
NEPA
The USAF prepared a Final EA and
issued a FONSI in 1997 as part of its
application for an incidental take
authorization. On March 1, 1999 (64 FR
9925), NMFS adopted this EA as
provided for by the Council on
Environmental Quality regulations. In
2003, NMFS prepared its own EA and
issued a FONSI for the final rule issued
in February, 2004. NMFS prepared a
Draft EA for issuance of regulations and
annual LOAs to the USAF for the period
2009–2014 and made it available for
public comment concurrently with the
proposed rule. NMFS has finalized the
EA and issued a FONSI for this action.
Therefore, preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement is not
necessary for this action. NMFS’ EA and
FONSI are available upon request (see
ADDRESSES).
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Coastal Zone Management Act
Consistency
The USAF conducts separate
consultations with the California
Coastal Commission (CCC) for each
launch activity, as each one is
considered a separate Federal action.
Past consultations between the USAF
and the CCC have indicated that
activities from VAFB similar to those
described in this document are
consistent to the maximum extent
practicable with the enforceable policies
of the California Coastal Act (CCA). The
USAF is in consultation with the CCC
for those launch activities that have not
yet been found to be consistent with the
CCA. Therefore, NMFS has determined
that the activities described in this
document are consistent to the
maximum extent practicable with the
enforceable policies of the CCA.
National Marine Sanctuaries Act
On December 8, 2008, NMFS
contacted the National Ocean Service’s
Office of National Marine Sanctuaries
(ONMS) regarding NMFS’ action of
promulgating regulations and issuing
LOAs for the USAF activities described
in the USAF’s application and the
proposed rule (73 FR 77577, December
19, 2008) to determine whether or not
NMFS’ action is likely to destroy, cause
the loss of, or injure any national marine
sanctuary resources. On December 12,
2008, the ONMS determined that no
further consultation with NMFS was
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:50 Feb 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
required on its proposed action as this
action is not likely to destroy, cause the
loss of, or injure any national marine
sanctuary resources.
Determinations
Based on the information provided in
the USAF application, NMFS’ EA, this
document, the public comments
submitted on the application and
proposed rule, and the USAF’s
comprehensive reports of the activities
through 2008, NMFS has determined
that the launching of SLVs, ICBMs, and
small missiles and aircraft and
helicopter operations at VAFB, will
result in no more than Level B
harassment of harbor seals, California
sea lions, northern elephant seals, and
northern fur seals. The effects of these
military readiness activities from VAFB
will be limited to short term and
localized changes in behavior, including
temporarily vacating haul-outs, and
possible TTS in the hearing of any
pinnipeds that are in close proximity to
a launch pad at the time of a launch.
NMFS has also determined that any
takes will have no more than a
negligible impact on the affected species
and stocks. No take by serious injury
and/or death is anticipated, and the
potential for permanent hearing
impairment is unlikely. Harassment
takes will be at the lowest level
practicable due to incorporation of the
mitigation measures mentioned
previously in this document. NMFS’
regulations for these exercises prescribe
the means of affecting the least
practicable adverse impact on marine
mammals and their habitat and set forth
requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of that taking.
Additionally, the launch activities and
aircraft and helicopter operations will
not have an unmitigable adverse impact
on the availability of marine mammal
stocks for subsistence use, as there are
no subsistence uses of these four
pinniped species in California waters.
Classification
The Office of Management and Budget
has determined that this proposed rule
is not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
Good cause exists to waive the 30-day
delay in effectiveness for this rule
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d). The USAF
has a Taurus (SLC 576–E) launch
scheduled for February 23, 2009, which
falls within 30 days of the publication
of this final rule. A delay would cost up
to hundreds of thousands of dollars per
day, depending on various factors,
including the cost of maintaining the
vehicle and payload in ready condition
and the number of personnel in the
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6241
launch crew. A launch delay would also
lead to increased risk for personnel if
there is increased handling time for
hazardous materials or ordnance that
has to be deactivated or offloaded,
depending on the stage of launch
preparations at the time of delay. In
addition to the significant costs that
would be borne by the government in
the event of a delay to this mission, the
mission requires a particular orbit for
the payload, and getting into that orbit
can be closely tied to the time of year
and, in some instances, the time of day.
Therefore, delaying this launch would
mean that the USAF would certainly be
impacted in its available launch
opportunities. The costs of delaying this
launch are greatly outweighed by the
benefits of allowing it to go forward
immediately. The mitigation and
monitoring required by this final rule
are for the benefit and protection of
marine mammals, many of which will
be more vulnerable after the 30 day
period. Delaying this launch by a few
weeks would cause it to occur during
the harbor seal pupping season on
VAFB. One of the mitigation
requirements is to avoid, whenever
possible, the launching of vehicles or
missiles during the harbor seal pupping
season. Additionally, the measures
contained in this final rule are
substantially similar to the measures
contained in the 5-year rule that expires
on February 6, 2009. The 30th SW,
USAF is the only entity regulated by
this rule. The USAF expressly requested
that NMFS issue the rule and
regulations and is both willing and able
to comply with the requirements of
NMFS’ final regulations and LOA, as
they were during the course of the
previous rules and regulations issued to
the USAF by NMFS to conduct these
activities, within the 30-day window.
At the proposed rule stage, the Chief
Counsel for Regulation of the
Department of Commerce certified to
the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
since it would apply only to the 30th
SW, USAF, and would have no effect,
directly or indirectly, on small
businesses. Because of this certification,
a regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required, and none has been prepared.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 216
Exports, Fish, Imports, Indians,
Labeling, Marine mammals, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Seafood, Transportation.
E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM
06FER1
6242
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 24 / Friday, February 6, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: February 2, 2009.
James W. Balsiger,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
For reasons set forth in the preamble,
50 CFR part 216 is amended as follows:
■
(Phoca vitulina); California sea lions
(Zalophus californianus); northern
elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris);
and northern fur seals (Callorhinus
ursinus).
§ 216.121
Effective dates.
PART 216—REGULATIONS
GOVERNING THE TAKE OF MARINE
MAMMALS INCIDENTAL TO
SPECIFIED ACTIVITIES
Regulations in this subpart are
effective from February 7, 2009, through
February 6, 2014.
1. The authority citation for part 216
continues to read as follows:
Subpart K—Taking Of Marine
Mammals Incidental To Space Vehicle
And Test Flight Activities
Sec.
216.120 Specified activity and specified
geographical region.
216.121 Effective dates.
216.122 Permissible methods of taking.
216.123 Prohibitions.
216.124 Mitigation.
216.125 Requirements for monitoring and
reporting.
216.126 Applications for Letters of
Authorization.
216.127 Letters of Authorization.
216.128 Renewal of Letters of
Authorization.
216.129 Modifications of Letters of
Authorization.
(a) Under Letters of Authorization
issued pursuant to § 216.106 and
216.127, the 30th Space Wing, U.S. Air
Force, its contractors, and clients, may
incidentally, but not intentionally, take
marine mammals by harassment, within
the area described in § 216.120,
provided the activity is in compliance
with all terms, conditions, and
requirements of the regulations in this
subpart and the appropriate Letter of
Authorization.
(b) The taking of marine mammals is
authorized for the species listed in
§ 216.120(b) and is limited to Level B
Harassment.
§ 216.123
§ 216.122
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.
2. Subpart K is added to part 216 to
read as follows:
■
Subpart K—Taking Of Marine
Mammals Incidental To Space Vehicle
And Test Flight Activities
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
§ 216.120 Specified activity and specified
geographical region.
(a) Regulations in this subpart apply
only to the incidental taking of those
marine mammals specified in paragraph
(b) of this section by the 30th Space
Wing, United States Air Force, and
those persons it authorizes to engage in:
(1) Launching up to 30 space and
missiles vehicles each year from
Vandenberg Air Force Base, for a total
of up to 150 missiles and rockets over
the 5-year period of the regulations in
this subpart,
(2) Launching up to 20 rockets each
year from Vandenberg Air Force Base,
for a total of up to 100 rocket launches
over the 5-year period of the regulations
in this subpart,
(3) Aircraft flight test operations, and
(4) Helicopter operations from
Vandenberg Air Force Base.
(b) The incidental take of marine
mammals on Vandenberg Air Force Base
and in waters off southern California,
under the activity identified in
paragraph (a) of this section, is limited
to the following species: Harbor seals
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:50 Feb 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
Permissible methods of taking.
Prohibitions.
Notwithstanding takings specified in
§ 216.120 and authorized by a Letter of
Authorization issued under §§ 216.106
and 216.127, no person in connection
with the activities described in
§ 216.120 may:
(a) Take any marine mammal not
specified in § 216.120(b);
(b) Take any marine mammal
specified in § 216.120(b) other than by
incidental, unintentional harassment;
(c) Take a marine mammal specified
in § 216.120(b) if such taking results in
more than a negligible impact on the
species or stocks of such marine
mammal; or
(d) Violate, or fail to comply with, the
terms, conditions, and requirements of
this subpart or a Letter of Authorization
issued under §§ 216.106 and 216.127.
§ 216.124
Mitigation.
(a) The activity identified in
§ 216.120(a) must be conducted in a
manner that minimizes, to the greatest
extent practicable, adverse impacts on
marine mammals and their habitats.
When conducting operations identified
in § 216.120(a), the mitigation measures
contained in the Letter of Authorization
issued under §§ 216.106 and 216.127
must be implemented. These mitigation
measures include (but are not limited
to):
(1) All aircraft and helicopter flight
paths must maintain a minimum
distance of 1,000 ft (305 m) from
recognized seal haul-outs and rookeries
(e.g., Point Sal, Purisima Point, Rocky
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Point), except in emergencies or for realtime security incidents (e.g., search-andrescue, fire-fighting), which may require
approaching pinniped haul-outs and
rookeries closer than 1,000 ft (305 m).
(2) For missile and rocket launches,
holders of Letters of Authorization must
avoid, whenever possible, launches
during the harbor seal pupping season
of March through June, unless
constrained by factors including, but not
limited to, human safety, national
security, or for space vehicle launch
trajectory necessary to meet mission
objectives.
(3) Vandenberg Air Force Base must
avoid, whenever possible, launches
which are predicted to produce a sonic
boom on the Northern Channel Islands
during harbor seal, elephant seal,
California sea lion, and northern fur seal
pupping seasons of March through June.
(4) If post-launch surveys determine
that an injurious or lethal take of a
marine mammal has occurred or there is
an indication that the distribution, size,
or productivity of the potentially
affected pinniped populations has been
affected, the launch procedure and the
monitoring methods must be reviewed,
in cooperation with NMFS, and, if
necessary, appropriate changes must be
made through modification to a Letter of
Authorization, prior to conducting the
next launch of the same vehicle under
that Letter of Authorization.
(5) Additional mitigation measures as
contained in a Letter of Authorization.
(b) [Reserved]
§ 216.125 Requirements for monitoring
and reporting.
(a) Holders of Letters of Authorization
issued pursuant to §§ 216.106 and
216.127 for activities described in
§ 216.120(a) are required to cooperate
with NMFS, and any other Federal, state
or local agency with authority to
monitor the impacts of the activity on
marine mammals. Unless specified
otherwise in the Letter of Authorization,
the Holder of the Letter of Authorization
must notify the Administrator,
Southwest Region, NMFS, by letter or
telephone, at least 2 weeks prior to
activities possibly involving the taking
of marine mammals. If the authorized
activity identified in § 216.120(a) is
thought to have resulted in the mortality
or injury of any marine mammals or in
any take of marine mammals not
identified in § 216.120(b), then the
Holder of the Letter of Authorization
must notify the Director, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, or
designee, by telephone (301–713–2289),
within 48 hours of the discovery of the
injured or dead animal.
E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM
06FER1
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 24 / Friday, February 6, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(b) Holders of Letters of Authorization
must designate qualified, on-site
individuals approved in advance by
NMFS, as specified in the Letter of
Authorization, to:
(1) Conduct observations on harbor
seal, elephant seal, and sea lion activity
in the vicinity of the rookery nearest the
launch platform or, in the absence of
pinnipeds at that location, at another
nearby haul-out, for at least 72 hours
prior to any planned launch occurring
during the harbor seal pupping season
(1 March through 30 June) and continue
for a period of time not less than 48
hours subsequent to launching.
(2) For launches during the harbor
seal pupping season (March through
June), conduct follow-up surveys within
2 weeks of the launch to ensure that
there were no adverse effects on any
marine mammals,
(3) Monitor haul-out sites on the
Northern Channel Islands, if it is
determined by modeling that a sonic
boom of greater than 1 psf could occur
in those areas (this determination will
be made in consultation with NMFS),
(4) Investigate the potential for
spontaneous abortion, disruption of
effective female-neonate bonding, and
other reproductive dysfunction,
(5) Supplement observations on
Vandenberg and on the Northern
Channel Islands with video-recording of
mother-pup seal responses for daylight
launches during the pupping season,
(6) Conduct acoustic measurements of
those launch vehicles that have not had
sound pressure level measurements
made previously, and
(7) Include multiple surveys each day
that surveys are required that record the
species, number of animals, general
behavior, presence of pups, age class,
gender and reaction to launch noise,
sonic booms or other natural or human
caused disturbances, in addition to
recording environmental conditions
such as tide, wind speed, air
temperature, and swell.
(c) Holders of Letters of Authorization
must conduct additional monitoring as
required under an annual Letter of
Authorization.
(d) Holders of Letters of Authorization
must submit a report to the Southwest
Administrator, NMFS, within 90 days
after each launch. This report must
contain the following information:
(1) Date(s) and time(s) of the launch,
(2) Design of the monitoring program,
and
(3) Results of the monitoring program,
including, but not necessarily limited
to:
(i) Numbers of pinnipeds present on
the haul-out prior to commencement of
the launch,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:50 Feb 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
(ii) Numbers of pinnipeds that may
have been harassed as noted by the
number of pinnipeds estimated to have
entered the water as a result of launch
noise,
(iii) The length of time pinnipeds
remained off the haul-out or rookery,
(iv) Numbers of pinniped adults,
juveniles or pups that may have been
injured or killed as a result of the
launch, and
(v) Behavioral modifications by
pinnipeds that were likely the result of
launch noise or the sonic boom.
(e) An annual report must be
submitted at the time of renewal of the
Letter of Authorization.
(f) A final report must be submitted at
least 180 days prior to expiration of
these regulations. This report will:
(1) Summarize the activities
undertaken and the results reported in
all previous reports,
(2) Assess the impacts at each of the
major rookeries,
(3) Assess the cumulative impacts on
pinnipeds and other marine mammals
from Vandenberg activities, and
(4) State the date(s), location(s), and
findings of any research activities
related to monitoring the effects on
launch noise and sonic booms on
marine mammal populations.
§ 216.126 Applications for Letters of
Authorization.
(a) To incidentally take marine
mammals pursuant to the regulations in
this subpart, the U.S. citizen (as defined
by § 216.103) conducting the activity
identified in § 216.120(a) (30th Space
Wing, U.S. Air Force) must apply for
and obtain either an initial Letter of
Authorization in accordance with
§ 216.127 or a renewal under § 216.128.
(b) The application must be submitted
to NMFS at least 30 days before the
activity is scheduled to begin.
(c) Applications for a Letter of
Authorization and for renewals of
Letters of Authorization must include
the following:
(1) Name of the U.S. citizen
requesting the authorization,
(2) A description of the activity, the
dates of the activity, and the specific
location of the activity, and
(3) Plans to monitor the behavior and
effects of the activity on marine
mammals.
(d) A copy of the Letter of
Authorization must be in the possession
of the persons conducting activities that
may involve incidental takings of
pinnipeds.
§ 216.127
Letters of Authorization.
(a) A Letter of Authorization, unless
suspended or revoked, will be valid for
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6243
a period of time not to exceed the period
of validity of this subpart, but must be
renewed annually subject to annual
renewal conditions in § 216.128.
(b) Each Letter of Authorization will
set forth:
(1) Permissible methods of incidental
taking;
(2) Means of effecting the least
practicable adverse impact on the
species, its habitat, and on the
availability of the species for
subsistence uses (i.e., mitigation); and
(3) Requirements for mitigation,
monitoring and reporting.
(c) Issuance and renewal of the Letter
of Authorization will be based on a
determination that the total number of
marine mammals taken by the activity
as a whole will have no more than a
negligible impact on the affected species
or stock of marine mammal(s).
§ 216.128 Renewal of Letters of
Authorization.
(a) A Letter of Authorization issued
under § 216.106 and § 216.127 for the
activity identified in § 216.120(a) will be
renewed annually upon:
(1) Notification to NMFS that the
activity described in the application
submitted under § 216.126 will be
undertaken and that there will not be a
substantial modification to the
described work, mitigation or
monitoring undertaken during the
upcoming 12 months;
(2) Timely receipt of the monitoring
reports required under § 216.125(d) and
(e), and the Letter of Authorization
issued under § 216.127, which has been
reviewed and accepted by NMFS; and
(3) A determination by NMFS that the
mitigation, monitoring and reporting
measures required under §§ 216.124 and
216.125 and the Letter of Authorization
issued under §§ 216.106 and 216.127,
were undertaken and will be undertaken
during the upcoming annual period of
validity of a renewed Letter of
Authorization.
(b) If a request for a renewal of a
Letter of Authorization issued under
§§ 216.106 and 216.128 indicates that a
substantial modification to the
described work, mitigation or
monitoring undertaken during the
upcoming season will occur, NMFS will
provide the public a period of 30 days
for review and comment on the request.
Review and comment on renewals of
Letters of Authorization are restricted
to:
(1) New cited information and data
indicating that the determinations made
in this document are in need of
reconsideration, and
(2) Proposed changes to the mitigation
and monitoring requirements contained
E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM
06FER1
6244
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 24 / Friday, February 6, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
in these regulations or in the current
Letter of Authorization.
(c) A notice of issuance or denial of
a renewal of a Letter of Authorization
will be published in the Federal
Register.
§ 216.129 Modifications of Letters of
Authorization.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, no substantive
modification (including withdrawal or
suspension) to the Letter of
Authorization by NMFS, issued
pursuant to §§ 216.106 and 216.127 and
subject to the provisions of this subpart
shall be made until after notification
and an opportunity for public comment
has been provided. For purposes of this
paragraph, a renewal of a Letter of
Authorization under § 216.128, without
modification (except for the period of
validity), is not considered a substantive
modification.
(b) If the Assistant Administrator
determines that an emergency exists
that poses a significant risk to the wellbeing of the species or stocks of marine
mammals specified in § 216.120(b), a
Letter of Authorization issued pursuant
to §§ 216.106 and 216.127 may be
substantively modified without prior
notification and an opportunity for
public comment. Notification will be
published in the Federal Register
within 30 days subsequent to the action.
[FR Doc. E9–2582 Filed 2–5–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 0808041043–9036–02]
RIN 0648–AX16
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and
Butterfish Fisheries; Specifications
and Management Measures
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
SUMMARY: This action implements 2009
specifications and management
measures for Atlantic mackerel, squid,
and butterfish (MSB), and modifies
existing management measures.
Specifically, this action maintains
quotas for Atlantic mackerel (mackerel),
Illex squid (Illex), and butterfish at the
same levels as 2008, while increasing
the quota for Loligo squid (Loligo).
Additionally, this action increases the
incidental possession limit for mackerel
and allows for the possibility of an
inseason adjustment to increase the
mackerel quota, if landings approach
harvest limits. These specifications and
management measures promote the
utilization and conservation of the MSB
resource.
DATES: Effective March 9, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Copies of supporting
documents used by the Mid-Atlantic
Fishery Management Council (Council),
including the Environmental
Assessment (EA) and Regulatory Impact
Review (RIR)/Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), are
available from: Daniel Furlong,
Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic
Fishery Management Council, Room
2115, Federal Building, 300 South New
Street, Dover, DE 19904–6790. The EA/
RIR/IRFA is accessible via the Internet
at https://www.nero.nmfs.gov. NMFS
prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (FRFA), which is contained in
the Classification section of this rule.
Copies of the FRFA and the Small Entity
Compliance Guide are available from
the Regional Administrator, Northeast
Regional Office, NMFS, 55 Great
Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930–
2276, and are also available via the
internet at https://www.nero.nmfs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carrie Nordeen, Fishery Policy Analyst,
978–281–9272, fax 978–281–9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Regulations implementing the Fishery
Management Plan for the Atlantic
Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish
Fisheries (FMP) appear at 50 CFR part
648, subpart B. Regulations governing
foreign fishing appear at 50 CFR part
600, subpart F. The regulations at
§§ 648.21 and 600.516(c) require that
NMFS, based on the maximum
optimum yield (Max OY) of each fishery
as established by the regulations,
annually publish a rule specifying the
amounts of the initial optimum yield
(IOY), allowable biological catch (ABC),
domestic annual harvest (DAH), and
domestic annual processing (DAP), as
well as, where applicable, the amounts
for total allowable level of foreign
fishing (TALFF) and joint venture
processing (JVP) for the affected species
managed under the FMP. In addition,
these regulations allow specifications to
be specified for up to 3 years, subject to
annual review. The regulations found in
§ 648.21 also specify that IOY for squid
is equal to the combination of research
quota (RQ) and DAH, with no TALFF
specified for squid. For butterfish, the
regulations specify that a butterfish
bycatch TALFF will be specified only if
TALFF is specified for mackerel.
The Council adopted 2009 MSB
specifications and management
measures at its June 2008 meeting and
submitted them to NMFS for review and
approval. Initial submission was on
August 1, 2008, and final submission
was on September 18, 2008. A proposed
rule for the 2009 MSB specifications
and management measures was
published on November 17, 2008 (73 FR
67829), and the public comment period
for the proposed rule ended on
December 17, 2008. Details concerning
the Council’s development of these
measures were presented in the
preamble of the proposed rule and are
not repeated here.
Final MSB Specifications and
Management Measures for the 2009
Fishing Year
This action implements the following
MSB specifications and management
measures for the 2009 fishing year,
which are described in detail below.
TABLE 1. FINAL SPECIFICATIONS, IN METRIC TONS (MT), FOR ATLANTIC MACKEREL, SQUID, AND BUTTERFISH FOR 2009
FISHING YEAR.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Specifications
Loligo
Illex
Mackerel
Butterfish
Max OY
ABC
IOY
DAH
DAP
JVP
32,000
19,000
18,8741
18,874
18,874
0
24,000
24,000
24,000
24,000
24,000
0
N/A
156,000
115,0002
115,0003
100,000
0
12,175
1,500
500
500
500
0
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:50 Feb 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\06FER1.SGM
06FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 24 (Friday, February 6, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6236-6244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2582]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 216
[Docket No. 0808041027-9041-02]
RIN 0648-AX08
Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to Space Vehicle and Test Flight Activities from Vandenberg
Air Force Base (VAFB), California
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS, upon application from the U.S. Air Force (USAF), is
issuing regulations to govern the unintentional taking of marine
mammals, by harassment, incidental to launching space launch vehicles,
intercontinental ballistic and small missiles, and aircraft and
helicopter operations at VAFB for the period February 2009 through
February 2014. The USAF's activities are considered military readiness
activities pursuant to the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), as
amended by the National Defense Authorization Act of 2004 (NDAA). These
regulations, which allow for the issuance of ``Letters of
Authorization'' (LOAs) for the incidental take of marine mammals during
the described activities and specified time frames, prescribe the
permissible methods of taking and other means of effecting the least
practicable adverse impact on marine mammal species and their habitat,
as well as requirements pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of
such taking.
DATES: Effective February 7, 2009, through February 7, 2014.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the USAF's application, which contains a list of
references used in this document, and NMFS' Final Environmental
Assessment (EA) and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) may be
obtained by writing to P. Michael Payne, Chief, Permits, Conservation
and Education Division, Office of Protected Resource, National Marine
Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910-
3225, by telephoning the contact listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, or on the Internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm#applications. Documents cited in this final rule may
also be viewed, by appointment, during regular business hours at the
above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Candace Nachman, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 713-2289, ext. 156, or Monica DeAngelis,
Southwest Regional Office, NMFS, (562) 980-3232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) to allow, upon request,
the incidental, but not intentional taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking
is limited to harassment, notice of a proposed authorization is
provided to the public for review.
Authorization for incidental takings may be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible impact on
[[Page 6237]]
the species or stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on
the availability of the species or stock(s) for certain subsistence
uses, and that the permissible methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such taking
are set forth.
NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as:
an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.
The NDAA (Public Law 108-136) removed the ``small numbers'' and
``specified geographical region'' limitations and amended the
definition of ``harassment'' as it applies to a ``military readiness
activity'' to read as follows (Section 3(18)(B) of the MMPA):
(i) any act that injures or has the significant potential to
injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild [Level A
Harassment]; or (ii) any act that disturbs or is likely to disturb a
marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of natural behavioral patterns, including, but not
limited to, migration, surfacing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering, to a point where such behavioral patterns are abandoned
or significantly altered [Level B Harassment].
Summary of Request
On March 21, 2008, NMFS received an application from the USAF
requesting authorization for the take of four species of marine mammals
incidental to space vehicle and test flight activities from VAFB, which
would impact pinnipeds on VAFB and the Northern Channel Islands (NCI).
These training activities are classified as military readiness
activities. Marine mammals may be exposed to continuous noise due
mostly to combustion effects of aircraft and launch vehicles and
impulsive noise due to sonic boom effects. The USAF requested
authorization to take four pinniped species by Level B Harassment.
Description of the Specified Activity
VAFB (see Figure 1 in the USAF application) is headquarters to the
30th Space Wing (SW), the Air Force Space Command unit that operates
VAFB and the Western Range. VAFB operates as a missile test base and
aerospace center, supporting west coast space launch activities for the
USAF, Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, and commercial contractors. VAFB is the main west coast
launch facility for placing commercial, government, and military
satellites into polar orbit on expendable (unmanned) launch vehicles,
and for testing and evaluation of intercontinental ballistic missiles
(ICBM) and sub-orbital target and interceptor missiles. In addition to
space vehicle and missile launch activities at VAFB, there are
helicopter and aircraft operations for purposes such as search-and-
rescue, delivery of space vehicle components, launch mission support,
and security reconnaissance. The USAF expects to launch a maximum of 30
rockets and missiles per year from VAFB.
There are currently six active space launch vehicle (SLV)
facilities at VAFB (VAFB, 2007), used to launch satellites into polar
orbit. These facilities support the launch programs for space vehicles
including the Atlas V, Delta II, Delta IV, Falcon, Minotaur, and
Taurus. The Falcon has yet to launch from VAFB and is scheduled for its
first launch in August, 2009 (30 SW, 2008a). A detailed description of
the activities to be conducted by the USAF, including vehicle types and
the sound exposure levels produced by each missile or rocket and
aircraft operations, was included in the proposed rule (73 FR 77577,
December 19, 2008) and may also be found in the USAF's application (see
ADDRESSES).
Description of Marine Mammals Potentially Affected by the Activity and
Habitat
The four species of marine mammals most likely to be present in the
action area are: Pacific harbor seals (Phoca vitulina richardii);
California sea lions (Zalophus californianus); northern elephant seals
(Mirounga angustirostris); and northern fur seals (Callorhinus
ursinus). Guadalupe fur seals (Arctocephalus townsendi) and Steller sea
lions (Eumetopias jubatus) have bred in the past on San Miguel Island,
but sightings have been rare since the mid-1980's.
The USAF has compiled information on the abundance, status, and
distribution of the species on VAFB and the NCI from surveys that they
have conducted over the last decade and from NMFS Stock Assessment
Reports (SARs). This information may be viewed in the USAF's
application (see ADDRESSES). Additional information is available in the
NMFS SARs, which are available at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/
sars/po2007.pdf.
The proposed rule (73 FR 77577, December 19, 2008) contained a
detailed description of the distribution of these species on VAFB and
the NCI, as well as a description of their habitat.
Comments and Responses
On July 25, 2008, NMFS published a notice of receipt of application
for an LOA in the Federal Register (73 FR 43410) and requested comments
and information from the public for 30 days. During that comment
period, NMFS received comments from the Marine Mammal Commission
(Commission) and one private citizen. Responses to those comments are
addressed in the proposed rule Federal Register notice (73 FR 77577,
December 19, 2008). On December 19, 2008, NMFS published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (73 FR 77577) on the USAF's request to take marine
mammals incidental to space vehicle and test flight activities from
VAFB and requested comments, information, and suggestions concerning
the request. During the 15-day public comment period, NMFS received
comments from the Commission and one private citizen. The comment from
the private citizen opposed the issuance of an authorization without
any specific substantiation for why such an authorization should not be
issued. For the reasons set forth in this preamble, NMFS believes
issuance of the authorization is appropriate. Following are the
comments from the Commission and NMFS' responses.
Comment 1: The Commission recommends that NMFS extend the public
comment period on the proposed rule for at least an additional 15 days,
or, alternatively, provide a post-promulgation comment period before
the effective date of the rule.
Response: NMFS has been issuing MMPA authorizations to the USAF to
conduct these activities from VAFB for more than 20 years, which has
allowed NMFS to develop relatively standard mitigation and monitoring
requirements for these activities, so rarely more than one or two
public comments are received. The public was afforded a 30-day comment
period to submit information and suggestions on the preparation of
proposed regulations beginning on July 25, 2008 with the publication of
the notice of receipt of application (73 FR 43410). NMFS received only
two comment letters at that time. Similarly, the same two organizations
or members of the public commented on the proposed rule. NMFS did not
receive any other requests to extend the comment period.
The last time NMFS developed regulations for the USAF to conduct
these same activities, NMFS published a notice of receipt of
application (68 FR 54894, September 19, 2003), which allowed for a 30-
day comment period and a notice of proposed rulemaking (68 FR 67629,
December 3, 2003), which allowed for a 15-day comment period. With only
slight changes to some of the launch vehicles or missiles to be used,
[[Page 6238]]
the activities to be authorized for the period of February 2009 to
February 2014 and therefore the mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
requirements are nearly identical to those required in the February
2004 to February 2009 regulations. In 2003, only the Commission
submitted comments on the proposed rulemaking. There has not been a
great deal of public interest in the MMPA authorization process for
these activities currently or in the past. Therefore, NMFS does not
believe it is necessary to extend the comment period for this action.
NMFS will not be able to provide a post-promulgation comment
period. The current regulations are set to expire on February 6, 2009.
The USAF currently has a launch planned for February 23, 2009. Since
these launches are planned around certain meteorological, as well as
other, conditions, it is not practical to have a post-promulgation
comment period. These launches are important to national security.
Comment 2: The Commission recommends that NMFS issue the final rule
as proposed, provided that the mitigation and monitoring activities
described in the USAF application and the proposed rule Federal
Register notice (73 FR 77577, December 19, 2008) are incorporated into
the final rule.
Response: NMFS agrees with the Commission's recommendation. All
measures contained in the proposed rulemaking Federal Register notice
are included in the final rule.
Comment 3: The Commission also recommends that NMFS specify in the
final rule that the authorized activities shall be suspended, pending
review, if there is any indication that the activities covered by the
rule are causing marine mammal mortalities or injuries or are affecting
the distribution, size, or productivity of the potentially affected
populations.
Response: The activities to be authorized are considered military
readiness activities and are important to national security. The USAF
launches several different types of vehicles and missiles from many
different space launch complexes on VAFB, sometimes only a few days
apart. Therefore, it would be impractical to suspend all activities.
The proposed rule (73 FR 77577, December 19, 2008) contained a
condition in the ``Mitigation'' section that, for the most part,
addressed the Commission's recommendation. Language has been added to
that condition to expand its coverage to include possible affects to
distribution, size, and productivity of the potentially affected
pinniped populations. Based on the Commission's recommendation, NMFS
has included the following condition in the final rule:
If post-launch surveys determine that an injurious or lethal
take of a marine mammal has occurred or there is an indication that
the distribution, size, or productivity of the potentially affected
pinniped populations has been affected, the launch procedure and the
monitoring methods must be reviewed, in cooperation with NMFS, and,
if necessary, appropriate changes must be made through modification
to an LOA, prior to conducting the next launch of the same vehicle
under that LOA.
Comment 4: The Commission recommends that NMFS require additional
acoustic and biological monitoring when new space vehicles or missiles
are launched to verify that the actual sound levels and responses of
animals are as predicted.
Response: Both the monitoring plan contained in the USAF's
application and the ``Monitoring'' section in the proposed rule Federal
Register notice (73 FR 77577, December 19, 2008) contained a
requirement that acoustic and biological monitoring be conducted on new
space and missile launch vehicles during at least the first launch,
whether it occurs within the pupping season or not. This condition is
included in the final rule.
Comment 5: Lastly, the Commission recommends that NMFS require
additional public notice and opportunity for comment before authorizing
the taking of marine mammals by any new space vehicles or missiles that
produce sound levels or frequencies significantly different from those
described in this authorization.
Response: As described in the USAF's application, the proposed
rule, and NMFS' EA, the specific launch vehicles may change over the
course of the five-year regulations (2009-2014) as NEPA analyses are
completed. This Federal Register document and NMFS' EA evaluate the
proposed level of activity and type of launches based on current and
projected information. To the extent that specific launch vehicles may
change, the USAF would be required to report such new vehicles to NMFS,
and NMFS would evaluate a particular vehicle (e.g., missiles) to ensure
that the vehicle fit within the parameters of the regulations. Thus,
the transition of individual craft is not expected to change the impact
assessment as set forth in NMFS' EA, and all activities would be
required to fall within the general description of specified activities
and estimates of marine mammal take described in this document and
NMFS' EA. If it is determined that the new space vehicles or missiles
will produce sound levels or frequencies significantly different from
those described in this authorization, then NMFS will make the
information available to the public for comment.
Potential Effects of Specified Activities on Marine Mammals
The activities under these regulations create two types of noise:
Continuous (but short-duration) noise, due mostly to combustion effects
of aircraft and launch vehicles; and impulsive noise, due to sonic boom
effects. Launch operations are the major source of noise on the marine
environment from VAFB. The operation of launch vehicle engines produces
significant sound levels. Generally, noise is generated from four
sources during launches: (1) Combustion noise from launch vehicle
chambers; (2) jet noise generated by the interaction of the exhaust jet
and the atmosphere; (3) combustion noise from the post-burning of
combustion products; and (4) sonic booms. Launch noise levels are
highly dependent on the type of first-stage booster and the fuel used
to propel the vehicle. Therefore, there is a great similarity in launch
noise production within each class size of launch vehicles.
The noise generated by VAFB activities will result in the
incidental harassment of pinnipeds, both behaviorally and in terms of
physiological (auditory) impacts. The noise and visual disturbances
from SLV and missile launches and aircraft and helicopter operations
may cause the animals to lift their heads, move towards the water, or
enter the water. Information on marine mammal responses to launch noise
that has been gathered under previous LOAs for these activities, as
well as a scientific research permit issued to VAFB by NMFS for a
research program (Permit No. 859-1680-01) to determine the short and
long-term effects of SLV noise and sonic booms on affected marine
mammals is contained in the USAF's application and the proposed
rulemaking Federal Register notice (73 FR 77577, December 19, 2008).
The potential effects described in the proposed rule are the same as
those that would occur under the final rule.
NMFS does not anticipate a significant impact on any of the species
or stocks of marine mammals from launches from VAFB. For even the
largest launch vehicles, such as Delta IV, the launch noises and sonic
booms can be expected to cause a startle response and flight to water
for those harbor seals, California sea lions and other pinnipeds that
are hauled out on the coastline of VAFB and on the NCI. The noise may
cause temporary
[[Page 6239]]
threshold shift (TTS) in hearing depending on exposure levels, but no
permanent threshold shift is anticipated. NMFS does not expect these
activities to result in the mortality of any marine mammals.
Numbers of Marine Mammals Estimated to be Taken by Harassment
The marine mammal species NMFS believes likely to be taken by Level
B harassment incidental to launch and aircraft and helicopter
operations at VAFB are harbor seals, California sea lions, northern
elephant seals, and northern fur seals. All of these species are
protected under the MMPA, and none are listed under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA). Numbers of animals that may be taken by Level B
harassment are expected to vary due to factors such as type of SLV,
location of the sonic boom, weather conditions (which can influence the
size of the sonic boom), the time of day, and the time of year. For
this reason, ranges are given for the harassment estimates of marine
mammals. Aircraft operations will occur frequently but will avoid
pinniped haul-out areas and are unlikely to disturb pinnipeds.
As noted earlier and in the proposed rule (73 FR 77577, December
19, 2008), sightings of Steller sea lions and Guadalupe fur seals have
been extremely rare the last few decades or low at VAFB and on the NCI.
Therefore, no takes by harassment are anticipated for either of these
species incidental to the USAF's activities.
Estimated Takes at VAFB
Harbor seals: As many as 600 harbor seals per launch may be taken.
Depending on the type of rocket being launched, the time of day, time
of the year, weather conditions, tide and swell conditions, the number
of seals that may be taken will range between 0 and 600. Launches and
aircraft operations may occur at any time of the year so any age
classes and gender may be taken.
California sea lions: As many as 200 sea lions per launch may be
taken. Sea lions at VAFB are usually juveniles of both sexes and sub-
adult males that haul out in the fall during the post breeding
dispersal. Births generally do not occur at VAFB, but five pups were
observed at VAFB in 2003, an El Nino year, although all were abandoned
by their mothers and died within several days of birth. Sick or
emaciated weaned pups may also haul out briefly. The number of sea
lions that may be taken will range between 0 and 200.
Northern elephant seals: As many as 200 elephant seals per launch
may be taken. Weaned elephant seal pups, juveniles, or young adults of
both sexes, may occasionally haul out at VAFB for several days to rest
or as long as 30 days to molt. Injured or sick seals may also haul out
briefly. The number of northern elephant seals that may be taken will
range between 0 and 200.
Northern fur seals: There are no reports of northern fur seals at
VAFB. Therefore, it is unlikely that any fur seals will be taken.
Estimated Takes on the NCI
Sonic booms created by SLVs may impact marine mammals on the NCI,
particularly SMI. Missile launches utilize westward trajectories so do
not cause sonic boom impacts to the NCI. The PCBoom sonic boom modeling
program will continue to be used to predict the area of sonic boom
impact and magnitude of the sonic boom on the NCI based on the launch
vehicle, speed, trajectory, and meteorological conditions. Prior to
each SLV launch, a predictive sonic boom map of the impact area and
magnitude of the sonic boom will be generated. Based on previous
monitoring of sonic booms created by SLVs on SMI (Thorson et al.,
1999a: 1999b), it is estimated that as much as approximately 25 percent
of the marine mammals may be disturbed on SMI (Thorson et al., 1999a;
1999b). Most sonic booms that reach SMI are small (<1 pound per square
foot [psf]), although larger sonic booms are possible, but rarely
occur. A conservative take estimate of as much as 25 percent of the
animals present is used for each species per launch.
Harbor seals: As many as 200 harbor seals of all age classes and
sexes may be taken per launch on the NCI. The number of harbor seals
that may be taken will range between 0 and 200.
California sea lions: As many as 5,800 sea lion pups and 2,500
juvenile and adult sea lions of either sex may be taken on the NCI per
launch. The number of sea lions that may be taken will range between 0
and 8,300.
Northern elephant seals: As many as 3,000 northern elephant seal
pups and 10,000 northern elephant seals of all age classes and sexes
may be taken per launch on the NCI. The number of elephant seals that
may be taken will range between 0 and 13,000.
Northern fur seals: As many as 300 northern fur seal pups and 1,100
juvenile and adult northern fur seals of both sexes may be taken per
launch at SMI. The number of fur seals that may be taken will range
between 0 and 1,400.
With the incorporation of mitigation measures proposed later in
this document, the USAF and NMFS expect that only Level B incidental
harassment may occur as a result of the proposed activities and that
these events will result in no detectable impact on marine mammal
species or stocks or on their habitats.
Potential Effects of Specified Activities on Marine Mammal Habitat
Impacts on marine mammal habitat are part of the consideration in
making a finding of negligible impact on the species and stocks of
marine mammals. Habitat includes, but is not necessarily limited to,
rookeries, mating grounds, feeding areas, and areas of similar
significance. Only short-term disturbance of marine mammals is expected
as a result of the proposed activities. No impacts to marine mammal
habitats are anticipated on VAFB or the NCI.
Potential Effects of Specified Activities on Subsistence Needs
NMFS has determined that the issuance of an LOA for USAF space
vehicle and missile launches and aircraft and helicopter operations at
VAFB would not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability
of the affected species or stocks for subsistence use since there are
no such uses for these pinniped species in California.
Mitigation
To minimize impacts on pinnipeds on beach haul-out sites and to
avoid any possible sensitizing or predisposing of pinnipeds to greater
responsiveness towards the sights and sounds of a launch, the USAF has
prepared the following mitigation measures, which NMFS has incorporated
into its regulations.
All aircraft and helicopter flight paths must maintain a minimum
distance of 1,000 ft (305 m) from recognized seal haul-outs and
rookeries (e.g., Point Sal, Purisima Point, Rocky Point), except in
emergencies or for real-time security incidents (e.g., search-and-
rescue, fire-fighting) which may require approaching pinniped haul-outs
and rookeries closer than 1,000 ft (305 m). For missile and rocket
launches, unless constrained by other factors including, but not
limited to, human safety, national security concerns or launch
trajectories, holders of LOAs must schedule launches to avoid, whenever
possible, launches during the harbor seal pupping season of March
through June. NMFS has expanded this requirement so that the USAF must
avoid, whenever possible, launches which are predicted to produce a
sonic boom on the NCI during harbor seal,
[[Page 6240]]
elephant seal, California sea lion, and northern fur seal pupping
seasons.
If post-launch surveys determine that an injurious or lethal take
of a marine mammal has occurred or there is an indication that the
distribution, size, or productivity of the potentially affected
pinniped populations has been affected, the launch procedure and the
monitoring methods must be reviewed, in cooperation with NMFS, and, if
necessary, appropriate changes must be made through modification to an
LOA, prior to conducting the next launch of the same vehicle under that
LOA.
Monitoring
As part of its application, the USAF provided a monitoring plan,
similar to that in the regulations (50 CFR 216.125) set to expire on
February 6, 2009, for assessing impacts to marine mammals from rocket
and missile launches at VAFB. This monitoring plan is described, in
detail, in their application (30 SW, 2008c). The USAF will conduct the
following monitoring under the regulations.
The monitoring will be conducted by a NMFS-approved marine mammal
biologist experienced in surveying large numbers of marine mammals.
Monitoring at the haul-out site closest to the launch facility will
commence at least 72 hours prior to the launch and continue until at
least 48 hours after the launch.
Monitoring for VAFB
Biological monitoring at VAFB will be conducted for all launches
during the harbor seal pupping season, 1 March to 30 June. Acoustic and
biological monitoring will be conducted on new space and missile launch
vehicles during at least the first launch, whether it occurs within the
pupping season or not. Also, the third Delta IV launch will be
monitored, and Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) testing of seals in
close proximity to the launch is planned. The testing will be
authorized under a scientific research permit issued under Section 104
of the MMPA. Such work was most recently conducted under Permit No.
859-1680-01, which expired on January 1, 2009. The USAF has submitted
an application to NMFS for issuance of a new scientific research permit
to continue the ABR tests on harbor seals, as well as other research
projects. NMFS is currently reviewing this application. If appropriate,
NMFS will issue a new scientific research permit to the USAF in early
spring 2009. NMFS estimates that the tests would be conducted during
years 2-5 of the regulations.
Monitoring will include multiple surveys each day that record, when
possible, the species, number of animals, general behavior, presence of
pups, age class, gender, and reaction to launch noise, sonic booms, or
other natural or human-caused disturbances. Environmental conditions
such as tide, wind speed, air temperature, and swell will also be
recorded. Time-lapse photography or video will be used during daylight
launches to document the behavior of mother-pup pairs during launch
activities. For launches during the harbor seal pupping season (March
through June), follow-up surveys will be made within 2 weeks of the
launch to ensure that there were no adverse effects on any marine
mammals. A report detailing the species, number of animals observed,
behavior, reaction to the launch noise, time to return to the haul-out
site, any adverse behavior and environmental conditions will be
submitted to NMFS within 90 days of the launch.
Monitoring for the NCI
Monitoring will be conducted on the NCI (San Miguel, Santa Cruz,
and Santa Rosa Islands) whenever a sonic boom over 1 psf is predicted
(using the most current sonic boom modeling programs) to impact one of
the Islands. Monitoring will be conducted at the haul-out site closest
to the predicted sonic boom impact area. Monitoring will be conducted
by a NMFS-approved marine mammal biologist experienced in surveying
large numbers of marine mammals. Monitoring will commence at least 72
hours prior to the launch and continue until at least 48 hours after
the launch.
Monitoring will include multiple surveys each day that record the
species, number of animals, general behavior, presence of pups, age
class, gender, and reaction to launch noise, sonic booms, or other
natural or human-caused disturbances. Environmental conditions such as
tide, wind speed, air temperature, and swell will also be recorded. Due
to the large numbers of pinnipeds found on some beaches of SMI, smaller
focal groups should be monitored in detail rather than the entire beach
population. A general estimate of the entire beach population should be
made once a day and their reaction to the launch noise noted.
Photography or video will be used during daylight launches to document
the behavior of mother-pup pairs or dependent pups during launch
activities. During the pupping season of any species affected by a
launch, follow-up surveys will be made within 2 weeks of the launch to
ensure that there were no adverse effects on any marine mammals. A
report detailing the species, number of animals observed, behavior,
reaction to the launch noise, time to return to the haul-out site, any
adverse behavior and environmental conditions will be submitted to NMFS
within 90 days of the launch.
Reporting
A report containing the following information must be submitted to
NMFS within 90 days after each launch: (1) Date(s) and time(s) of each
launch; (2) date(s), location(s), and preliminary findings of any
research activities related to monitoring the effects on launch noise
and sonic booms on marine mammal populations; and (3) results of the
monitoring programs, including but not necessarily limited to (a)
numbers of pinnipeds present on the haul-out prior to commencement of
the launch, (b) numbers of pinnipeds that may have been harassed as
noted by the number of pinnipeds estimated to have entered the water as
a result of launch noise, (c) the length of time(s) pinnipeds remained
off the haul-out or rookery, (d) the numbers of pinniped adults or pups
that may have been injured or killed as a result of the launch; and (4)
any behavioral modifications by pinnipeds that likely were the result
of launch noise or the sonic boom.
If a freshly dead or seriously injured pinniped is found during
post-launch monitoring, the incident must be reported within 48 hours
to the NMFS Office of Protected Resources and the NMFS Southwest
Regional Office.
An annual report must be submitted to NMFS at the time of renewal
of the LOA described in Sec. 216.127, that describes any incidental
takings under an LOA not reported in the 90-day launch reports, such as
the aircraft test program and helicopter operations and any assessments
made of their impacts on hauled-out pinnipeds.
A final report must be submitted to NMFS no later than 180 days
prior to expiration of these regulations. This report must summarize
the findings made in all previous reports and assess both the impacts
at each of the major rookeries and the cumulative impact on pinnipeds
and any other marine mammals from Vandenberg activities.
ESA
In December, 2003, NMFS determined that the USAF's activities and
the promulgation of regulations and issuance of LOAs are not likely to
adversely affect any species or their habitats that are listed as
threatened or endangered under the ESA. The activities to be authorized
under these
[[Page 6241]]
regulations are not substantially different from those described in the
2003 consultation. Therefore, there has not been a reinitiation of
consultation under section 7 of the ESA since none of the reinitiation
triggers have been met.
NEPA
The USAF prepared a Final EA and issued a FONSI in 1997 as part of
its application for an incidental take authorization. On March 1, 1999
(64 FR 9925), NMFS adopted this EA as provided for by the Council on
Environmental Quality regulations. In 2003, NMFS prepared its own EA
and issued a FONSI for the final rule issued in February, 2004. NMFS
prepared a Draft EA for issuance of regulations and annual LOAs to the
USAF for the period 2009-2014 and made it available for public comment
concurrently with the proposed rule. NMFS has finalized the EA and
issued a FONSI for this action. Therefore, preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement is not necessary for this action. NMFS'
EA and FONSI are available upon request (see ADDRESSES).
Coastal Zone Management Act Consistency
The USAF conducts separate consultations with the California
Coastal Commission (CCC) for each launch activity, as each one is
considered a separate Federal action. Past consultations between the
USAF and the CCC have indicated that activities from VAFB similar to
those described in this document are consistent to the maximum extent
practicable with the enforceable policies of the California Coastal Act
(CCA). The USAF is in consultation with the CCC for those launch
activities that have not yet been found to be consistent with the CCA.
Therefore, NMFS has determined that the activities described in this
document are consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the
enforceable policies of the CCA.
National Marine Sanctuaries Act
On December 8, 2008, NMFS contacted the National Ocean Service's
Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS) regarding NMFS' action of
promulgating regulations and issuing LOAs for the USAF activities
described in the USAF's application and the proposed rule (73 FR 77577,
December 19, 2008) to determine whether or not NMFS' action is likely
to destroy, cause the loss of, or injure any national marine sanctuary
resources. On December 12, 2008, the ONMS determined that no further
consultation with NMFS was required on its proposed action as this
action is not likely to destroy, cause the loss of, or injure any
national marine sanctuary resources.
Determinations
Based on the information provided in the USAF application, NMFS'
EA, this document, the public comments submitted on the application and
proposed rule, and the USAF's comprehensive reports of the activities
through 2008, NMFS has determined that the launching of SLVs, ICBMs,
and small missiles and aircraft and helicopter operations at VAFB, will
result in no more than Level B harassment of harbor seals, California
sea lions, northern elephant seals, and northern fur seals. The effects
of these military readiness activities from VAFB will be limited to
short term and localized changes in behavior, including temporarily
vacating haul-outs, and possible TTS in the hearing of any pinnipeds
that are in close proximity to a launch pad at the time of a launch.
NMFS has also determined that any takes will have no more than a
negligible impact on the affected species and stocks. No take by
serious injury and/or death is anticipated, and the potential for
permanent hearing impairment is unlikely. Harassment takes will be at
the lowest level practicable due to incorporation of the mitigation
measures mentioned previously in this document. NMFS' regulations for
these exercises prescribe the means of affecting the least practicable
adverse impact on marine mammals and their habitat and set forth
requirements pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of that taking.
Additionally, the launch activities and aircraft and helicopter
operations will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of marine mammal stocks for subsistence use, as there are
no subsistence uses of these four pinniped species in California
waters.
Classification
The Office of Management and Budget has determined that this
proposed rule is not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Good cause exists to waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness for
this rule pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d). The USAF has a Taurus (SLC 576-
E) launch scheduled for February 23, 2009, which falls within 30 days
of the publication of this final rule. A delay would cost up to
hundreds of thousands of dollars per day, depending on various factors,
including the cost of maintaining the vehicle and payload in ready
condition and the number of personnel in the launch crew. A launch
delay would also lead to increased risk for personnel if there is
increased handling time for hazardous materials or ordnance that has to
be deactivated or offloaded, depending on the stage of launch
preparations at the time of delay. In addition to the significant costs
that would be borne by the government in the event of a delay to this
mission, the mission requires a particular orbit for the payload, and
getting into that orbit can be closely tied to the time of year and, in
some instances, the time of day. Therefore, delaying this launch would
mean that the USAF would certainly be impacted in its available launch
opportunities. The costs of delaying this launch are greatly outweighed
by the benefits of allowing it to go forward immediately. The
mitigation and monitoring required by this final rule are for the
benefit and protection of marine mammals, many of which will be more
vulnerable after the 30 day period. Delaying this launch by a few weeks
would cause it to occur during the harbor seal pupping season on VAFB.
One of the mitigation requirements is to avoid, whenever possible, the
launching of vehicles or missiles during the harbor seal pupping
season. Additionally, the measures contained in this final rule are
substantially similar to the measures contained in the 5-year rule that
expires on February 6, 2009. The 30th SW, USAF is the only entity
regulated by this rule. The USAF expressly requested that NMFS issue
the rule and regulations and is both willing and able to comply with
the requirements of NMFS' final regulations and LOA, as they were
during the course of the previous rules and regulations issued to the
USAF by NMFS to conduct these activities, within the 30-day window.
At the proposed rule stage, the Chief Counsel for Regulation of the
Department of Commerce certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of
the Small Business Administration that this rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities since it would apply only to the 30th SW, USAF, and would have
no effect, directly or indirectly, on small businesses. Because of this
certification, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required, and
none has been prepared.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 216
Exports, Fish, Imports, Indians, Labeling, Marine mammals,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Seafood,
Transportation.
[[Page 6242]]
Dated: February 2, 2009.
James W. Balsiger,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
0
For reasons set forth in the preamble, 50 CFR part 216 is amended as
follows:
PART 216--REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE TAKE OF MARINE MAMMALS
INCIDENTAL TO SPECIFIED ACTIVITIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 216 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.
0
2. Subpart K is added to part 216 to read as follows:
Subpart K--Taking Of Marine Mammals Incidental To Space Vehicle And
Test Flight Activities
Sec.
216.120 Specified activity and specified geographical region.
216.121 Effective dates.
216.122 Permissible methods of taking.
216.123 Prohibitions.
216.124 Mitigation.
216.125 Requirements for monitoring and reporting.
216.126 Applications for Letters of Authorization.
216.127 Letters of Authorization.
216.128 Renewal of Letters of Authorization.
216.129 Modifications of Letters of Authorization.
Subpart K--Taking Of Marine Mammals Incidental To Space Vehicle And
Test Flight Activities
Sec. 216.120 Specified activity and specified geographical region.
(a) Regulations in this subpart apply only to the incidental taking
of those marine mammals specified in paragraph (b) of this section by
the 30th Space Wing, United States Air Force, and those persons it
authorizes to engage in:
(1) Launching up to 30 space and missiles vehicles each year from
Vandenberg Air Force Base, for a total of up to 150 missiles and
rockets over the 5-year period of the regulations in this subpart,
(2) Launching up to 20 rockets each year from Vandenberg Air Force
Base, for a total of up to 100 rocket launches over the 5-year period
of the regulations in this subpart,
(3) Aircraft flight test operations, and
(4) Helicopter operations from Vandenberg Air Force Base.
(b) The incidental take of marine mammals on Vandenberg Air Force
Base and in waters off southern California, under the activity
identified in paragraph (a) of this section, is limited to the
following species: Harbor seals (Phoca vitulina); California sea lions
(Zalophus californianus); northern elephant seals (Mirounga
angustirostris); and northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus).
Sec. 216.121 Effective dates.
Regulations in this subpart are effective from February 7, 2009,
through February 6, 2014.
Sec. 216.122 Permissible methods of taking.
(a) Under Letters of Authorization issued pursuant to Sec. 216.106
and 216.127, the 30th Space Wing, U.S. Air Force, its contractors, and
clients, may incidentally, but not intentionally, take marine mammals
by harassment, within the area described in Sec. 216.120, provided the
activity is in compliance with all terms, conditions, and requirements
of the regulations in this subpart and the appropriate Letter of
Authorization.
(b) The taking of marine mammals is authorized for the species
listed in Sec. 216.120(b) and is limited to Level B Harassment.
Sec. 216.123 Prohibitions.
Notwithstanding takings specified in Sec. 216.120 and authorized
by a Letter of Authorization issued under Sec. Sec. 216.106 and
216.127, no person in connection with the activities described in Sec.
216.120 may:
(a) Take any marine mammal not specified in Sec. 216.120(b);
(b) Take any marine mammal specified in Sec. 216.120(b) other than
by incidental, unintentional harassment;
(c) Take a marine mammal specified in Sec. 216.120(b) if such
taking results in more than a negligible impact on the species or
stocks of such marine mammal; or
(d) Violate, or fail to comply with, the terms, conditions, and
requirements of this subpart or a Letter of Authorization issued under
Sec. Sec. 216.106 and 216.127.
Sec. 216.124 Mitigation.
(a) The activity identified in Sec. 216.120(a) must be conducted
in a manner that minimizes, to the greatest extent practicable, adverse
impacts on marine mammals and their habitats. When conducting
operations identified in Sec. 216.120(a), the mitigation measures
contained in the Letter of Authorization issued under Sec. Sec.
216.106 and 216.127 must be implemented. These mitigation measures
include (but are not limited to):
(1) All aircraft and helicopter flight paths must maintain a
minimum distance of 1,000 ft (305 m) from recognized seal haul-outs and
rookeries (e.g., Point Sal, Purisima Point, Rocky Point), except in
emergencies or for real-time security incidents (e.g., search-and-
rescue, fire-fighting), which may require approaching pinniped haul-
outs and rookeries closer than 1,000 ft (305 m).
(2) For missile and rocket launches, holders of Letters of
Authorization must avoid, whenever possible, launches during the harbor
seal pupping season of March through June, unless constrained by
factors including, but not limited to, human safety, national security,
or for space vehicle launch trajectory necessary to meet mission
objectives.
(3) Vandenberg Air Force Base must avoid, whenever possible,
launches which are predicted to produce a sonic boom on the Northern
Channel Islands during harbor seal, elephant seal, California sea lion,
and northern fur seal pupping seasons of March through June.
(4) If post-launch surveys determine that an injurious or lethal
take of a marine mammal has occurred or there is an indication that the
distribution, size, or productivity of the potentially affected
pinniped populations has been affected, the launch procedure and the
monitoring methods must be reviewed, in cooperation with NMFS, and, if
necessary, appropriate changes must be made through modification to a
Letter of Authorization, prior to conducting the next launch of the
same vehicle under that Letter of Authorization.
(5) Additional mitigation measures as contained in a Letter of
Authorization.
(b) [Reserved]
Sec. 216.125 Requirements for monitoring and reporting.
(a) Holders of Letters of Authorization issued pursuant to
Sec. Sec. 216.106 and 216.127 for activities described in Sec.
216.120(a) are required to cooperate with NMFS, and any other Federal,
state or local agency with authority to monitor the impacts of the
activity on marine mammals. Unless specified otherwise in the Letter of
Authorization, the Holder of the Letter of Authorization must notify
the Administrator, Southwest Region, NMFS, by letter or telephone, at
least 2 weeks prior to activities possibly involving the taking of
marine mammals. If the authorized activity identified in Sec.
216.120(a) is thought to have resulted in the mortality or injury of
any marine mammals or in any take of marine mammals not identified in
Sec. 216.120(b), then the Holder of the Letter of Authorization must
notify the Director, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, or designee,
by telephone (301-713-2289), within 48 hours of the discovery of the
injured or dead animal.
[[Page 6243]]
(b) Holders of Letters of Authorization must designate qualified,
on-site individuals approved in advance by NMFS, as specified in the
Letter of Authorization, to:
(1) Conduct observations on harbor seal, elephant seal, and sea
lion activity in the vicinity of the rookery nearest the launch
platform or, in the absence of pinnipeds at that location, at another
nearby haul-out, for at least 72 hours prior to any planned launch
occurring during the harbor seal pupping season (1 March through 30
June) and continue for a period of time not less than 48 hours
subsequent to launching.
(2) For launches during the harbor seal pupping season (March
through June), conduct follow-up surveys within 2 weeks of the launch
to ensure that there were no adverse effects on any marine mammals,
(3) Monitor haul-out sites on the Northern Channel Islands, if it
is determined by modeling that a sonic boom of greater than 1 psf could
occur in those areas (this determination will be made in consultation
with NMFS),
(4) Investigate the potential for spontaneous abortion, disruption
of effective female-neonate bonding, and other reproductive
dysfunction,
(5) Supplement observations on Vandenberg and on the Northern
Channel Islands with video-recording of mother-pup seal responses for
daylight launches during the pupping season,
(6) Conduct acoustic measurements of those launch vehicles that
have not had sound pressure level measurements made previously, and
(7) Include multiple surveys each day that surveys are required
that record the species, number of animals, general behavior, presence
of pups, age class, gender and reaction to launch noise, sonic booms or
other natural or human caused disturbances, in addition to recording
environmental conditions such as tide, wind speed, air temperature, and
swell.
(c) Holders of Letters of Authorization must conduct additional
monitoring as required under an annual Letter of Authorization.
(d) Holders of Letters of Authorization must submit a report to the
Southwest Administrator, NMFS, within 90 days after each launch. This
report must contain the following information:
(1) Date(s) and time(s) of the launch,
(2) Design of the monitoring program, and
(3) Results of the monitoring program, including, but not
necessarily limited to:
(i) Numbers of pinnipeds present on the haul-out prior to
commencement of the launch,
(ii) Numbers of pinnipeds that may have been harassed as noted by
the number of pinnipeds estimated to have entered the water as a result
of launch noise,
(iii) The length of time pinnipeds remained off the haul-out or
rookery,
(iv) Numbers of pinniped adults, juveniles or pups that may have
been injured or killed as a result of the launch, and
(v) Behavioral modifications by pinnipeds that were likely the
result of launch noise or the sonic boom.
(e) An annual report must be submitted at the time of renewal of
the Letter of Authorization.
(f) A final report must be submitted at least 180 days prior to
expiration of these regulations. This report will:
(1) Summarize the activities undertaken and the results reported in
all previous reports,
(2) Assess the impacts at each of the major rookeries,
(3) Assess the cumulative impacts on pinnipeds and other marine
mammals from Vandenberg activities, and
(4) State the date(s), location(s), and findings of any research
activities related to monitoring the effects on launch noise and sonic
booms on marine mammal populations.
Sec. 216.126 Applications for Letters of Authorization.
(a) To incidentally take marine mammals pursuant to the regulations
in this subpart, the U.S. citizen (as defined by Sec. 216.103)
conducting the activity identified in Sec. 216.120(a) (30th Space
Wing, U.S. Air Force) must apply for and obtain either an initial
Letter of Authorization in accordance with Sec. 216.127 or a renewal
under Sec. 216.128.
(b) The application must be submitted to NMFS at least 30 days
before the activity is scheduled to begin.
(c) Applications for a Letter of Authorization and for renewals of
Letters of Authorization must include the following:
(1) Name of the U.S. citizen requesting the authorization,
(2) A description of the activity, the dates of the activity, and
the specific location of the activity, and
(3) Plans to monitor the behavior and effects of the activity on
marine mammals.
(d) A copy of the Letter of Authorization must be in the possession
of the persons conducting activities that may involve incidental
takings of pinnipeds.
Sec. 216.127 Letters of Authorization.
(a) A Letter of Authorization, unless suspended or revoked, will be
valid for a period of time not to exceed the period of validity of this
subpart, but must be renewed annually subject to annual renewal
conditions in Sec. 216.128.
(b) Each Letter of Authorization will set forth:
(1) Permissible methods of incidental taking;
(2) Means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact on the
species, its habitat, and on the availability of the species for
subsistence uses (i.e., mitigation); and
(3) Requirements for mitigation, monitoring and reporting.
(c) Issuance and renewal of the Letter of Authorization will be
based on a determination that the total number of marine mammals taken
by the activity as a whole will have no more than a negligible impact
on the affected species or stock of marine mammal(s).
Sec. 216.128 Renewal of Letters of Authorization.
(a) A Letter of Authorization issued under Sec. 216.106 and Sec.
216.127 for the activity identified in Sec. 216.120(a) will be renewed
annually upon:
(1) Notification to NMFS that the activity described in the
application submitted under Sec. 216.126 will be undertaken and that
there will not be a substantial modification to the described work,
mitigation or monitoring undertaken during the upcoming 12 months;
(2) Timely receipt of the monitoring reports required under Sec.
216.125(d) and (e), and the Letter of Authorization issued under Sec.
216.127, which has been reviewed and accepted by NMFS; and
(3) A determination by NMFS that the mitigation, monitoring and
reporting measures required under Sec. Sec. 216.124 and 216.125 and
the Letter of Authorization issued under Sec. Sec. 216.106 and
216.127, were undertaken and will be undertaken during the upcoming
annual period of validity of a renewed Letter of Authorization.
(b) If a request for a renewal of a Letter of Authorization issued
under Sec. Sec. 216.106 and 216.128 indicates that a substantial
modification to the described work, mitigation or monitoring undertaken
during the upcoming season will occur, NMFS will provide the public a
period of 30 days for review and comment on the request. Review and
comment on renewals of Letters of Authorization are restricted to:
(1) New cited information and data indicating that the
determinations made in this document are in need of reconsideration,
and
(2) Proposed changes to the mitigation and monitoring requirements
contained
[[Page 6244]]
in these regulations or in the current Letter of Authorization.
(c) A notice of issuance or denial of a renewal of a Letter of
Authorization will be published in the Federal Register.
Sec. 216.129 Modifications of Letters of Authorization.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no
substantive modification (including withdrawal or suspension) to the
Letter of Authorization by NMFS, issued pursuant to Sec. Sec. 216.106
and 216.127 and subject to the provisions of this subpart shall be made
until after notification and an opportunity for public comment has been
provided. For purposes of this paragraph, a renewal of a Letter of
Authorization under Sec. 216.128, without modification (except for the
period of validity), is not considered a substantive modification.
(b) If the Assistant Administrator determines that an emergency
exists that poses a significant risk to the well-being of the species
or stocks of marine mammals specified in Sec. 216.120(b), a Letter of
Authorization issued pursuant to Sec. Sec. 216.106 and 216.127 may be
substantively modified without prior notification and an opportunity
for public comment. Notification will be published in the Federal
Register within 30 days subsequent to the action.
[FR Doc. E9-2582 Filed 2-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S