Madrid Protocol, 6269-6271 [E9-2539]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 24 / Friday, February 6, 2009 / Notices
II. Method of Collection
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Paper reports are required from
participants; these reports are
transmitted by U.S. mail or facsimile.
Patent and Trademark Office
III. Data
ACTION: Proposed collection; comment
request.
Madrid Protocol
OMB Control Number: 0648–0545.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1,142.
Estimated Time per Response: 2 hours
each for: Application for Cooperative
Quota, Application for Limited Access
Fishery, Application for Entry-level
Fishery, and Application to Opt-out; 2
hours for Application for InterCooperative Transfer of Cooperative
Quota and Application to Participate; 4
hours for Annual Rockfish Cooperative
Report; 6 minutes for Rockfish Catch
Report; 15 minutes for Cooperative
Termination of Fishing Declaration; 30
minutes for Vessel Check-in and Checkout; and 4 hours for Appeals.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 3,270.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $5,909.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: February 2, 2009.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–2496 Filed 2–5–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:16 Feb 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on the revision of a continuing
information collection, as required by
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before April 7, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• E-mail: Susan.Fawcett@uspto.gov.
Include ‘‘0651–0051 comment’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Fax: 571–273–0112, marked to the
attention of Susan K. Fawcett.
• Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records
Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, Customer Information Services
Group, Public Information Services
Division, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1450.
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Jennifer Chicoski,
Attorney Advisor, Office of the
Commissioner for Trademarks, United
States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313–
1451; by telephone at 571–272–8943; or
by e-mail to
Jennifer.Chicoski@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
This collection of information is
required by the Trademark Act of 1946,
15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq., which provides
for the Federal registration of
trademarks, service marks, collective
trademarks and service marks, collective
membership marks, and certification
marks. Individuals and businesses that
use or intend to use such marks in
commerce may file an application to
register the marks with the United
States Patent and Trademark Office
(USPTO).
The Protocol Relating to the Madrid
Agreement Concerning the International
Registration of Marks (‘‘Madrid
Protocol’’) is an international treaty that
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6269
allows a trademark owner to seek
registration in any of the participating
countries by filing a single international
application. The International Bureau
(‘‘IB’’) of the World Intellectual Property
Organization (‘‘WIPO’’) in Geneva,
Switzerland, administers the
international registration system. The
Madrid Protocol Implementation Act of
2002 amended the Trademark Act to
provide that: (1) The owner of a U.S.
application or registration may seek
protection of its mark in any of the
participating countries by submitting a
single international application to the IB
through the USPTO, and (2) the holder
of an international registration may
request an extension of protection of the
international registration to the United
States. The Madrid Protocol became
effective in the United States on
November 2, 2003, and is implemented
under 15 U.S.C. 1141 et seq. and 37 CFR
Part 2 and Part 7.
An international application
submitted through the USPTO must be
based on an active U.S. application or
registration and must be filed by the
owner of the application or registration.
The USPTO reviews the international
application to certify that it corresponds
to the data contained in the existing
U.S. application or registration before
forwarding the international application
to the IB. The IB then reviews the
international application to determine
whether the Madrid filing requirements
have been met and the required fees
have been paid. If the international
application is unacceptable, the IB will
send a notice of irregularity to the
USPTO and the applicant. The
applicant must respond to the
irregularities to avoid abandonment,
unless a response from the USPTO is
required. After any irregularities are
corrected and the application is
accepted, the IB registers the mark,
publishes the registration in the WIPO
Gazette of International Marks, and
sends a certificate to the holder.
When the mark is registered, the IB
notifies each country designated in the
application of the request for extension
of protection. Once an international
registration has been issued, the holder
may also file subsequent designations to
request an extension of protection to
additional countries.
Under Section 71 of the Trademark
Act, a registered extension of protection
to the United States will be cancelled
unless the holder of the international
registration periodically files affidavits
of continued use in commerce or
excusable nonuse. These affidavits
cannot be filed until five years after the
USPTO registers an extension of
protection. Since the USPTO will not be
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
6270
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 24 / Friday, February 6, 2009 / Notices
accepting these affidavits until February
1, 2010, the estimated burden for these
affidavits will not be included in this
collection at this time.
This collection includes the
information necessary for the USPTO to
process applications for international
registration and related requests under
the Madrid Protocol. The USPTO
provides electronic forms for filing the
Application for International
Registration, Subsequent Designation,
and Response to a Notice of Irregularity
online through the USPTO Web site. An
electronic form for the Request for
Transformation is under development.
Applicants may also submit the items in
this collection on paper or by using the
forms provided by the IB, which are
available on the WIPO Web site. The IB
requires Applications for International
Registration and Subsequent
Designations that are filed on paper to
be submitted on the official IB forms.
II. Method of Collection
By mail, hand delivery, or
electronically to the USPTO.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651–0051.
Form Number(s): PTO–2131, PTO–
2132, PTO–2133.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; businesses or other forprofits; and not-for-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
5,330 responses per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The
USPTO estimates that it will take the
Estimated
time for
response
Item
Application for International Registration (PTO–2131) ..................................................................
Subsequent Designation (PTO–2132) ...........................................................................................
Response to Notice of Irregularity (PTO–2133) ............................................................................
Request that the USPTO Replace a U.S. Registration with a Subsequently Registered Extension of Protection to the United States.
Request to Record an Assignment or Restriction of a Holder’s Right to Dispose of an International Registration.
Request that the USPTO Transform a Cancelled Extension of Protection into an Application
for Registration under Section 1 or 44 of the Act.
Petition to Review Refusal to Certify an International Application ................................................
Affidavit of Continued Use or Excusable Nonuse under Section 71 of the Act ............................
Total ........................................................................................................................................
1 Not
15
15
15
30
minutes
minutes
minutes
minutes
Estimated
annual
responses
Estimated
annual burden
hours
..
..
..
..
3,900
400
1,000
4
975
100
250
2
30 minutes ..
5
3
15 minutes ..
6
2
1 hour ..........
15 minutes ..
15
(1)
15
0
.....................
5,330
1,347
until Feb. 2010.
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour
Respondent Cost Burden: $529,701 per
year. There are no capital start-up,
maintenance, or recordkeeping costs
associated with this information
collection. However, this collection
does have annual (non-hour) costs in
the form of filing fees and postage costs.
The USPTO charges fees for
processing international applications
and related requests under the Madrid
Protocol as set forth in 37 CFR 7.6. In
addition to these USPTO fees,
applicants must also pay international
filing fees to the IB as indicated in 37
CFR 7.7. The USPTO estimates that the
total filing fees in the form of USPTO
processing fees associated with this
collection will be approximately
$529,650 per year as calculated in the
accompanying table.
Estimated
annual
responses
Item
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
public approximately 15 minutes (0.25
hours) to one hour to complete the
information in this collection, including
the time to gather the necessary
information, prepare the documents,
and submit the completed request to the
USPTO.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Burden Hours: 1,347 hours per year.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Cost Burden: $417,570 per year. The
USPTO expects that the information in
this collection will be prepared by
attorneys. Using the professional rate of
$310 per hour for attorneys in private
firms, the USPTO estimates that the
respondent cost burden for submitting
the information in this collection will be
approximately $417,570 per year.
Application for International Registration, for certifying an international application based on a
single basic application or registration (per international class) ..............................................
Application for International Registration, for certifying an international application based on
more than one basic application or registration (per international class) ...............................
Subsequent Designation ..............................................................................................................
Response to Notice of Irregularity ...............................................................................................
Request that the USPTO Replace a U.S. Registration with a Subsequently Registered Extension of Protection to the United States (per international class) .............................................
Request to Record an Assignment or Restriction of a Holder’s Right to Dispose of an International Registration ................................................................................................................
Request that the USPTO Transform a Cancelled Extension of Protection into an Application
for Registration under Section 1 or 44 of the Act ....................................................................
Petition to Review Refusal to Certify an International Application ..............................................
Affidavit of Continued Use or Excusable Nonuse under Section 71 of the Act (per international class) ..........................................................................................................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:16 Feb 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
Fee amount
Estimated
annual filing
costs
2,000
$100.00
$200,000.00
1,900
400
1,000
150.00
100.00
0.00
285,000.00
40,000.00
0.00
4
100.00
400.00
5
100.00
500.00
6
15
375.00
100.00
2,250.00
1,500.00
1
100.00
0.00
06FEN1
6271
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 24 / Friday, February 6, 2009 / Notices
Estimated
annual
responses
Item
Total ......................................................................................................................................
1 Not
Estimated
annual filing
costs
........................
529,650.00
until Feb. 2010.
The public may submit the items in
this collection to the USPTO by mail
through the United States Postal
Service. The USPTO estimates that
approximately 1% (53 out of 5,300) of
the international applications,
subsequent designations, and responses
to notices of irregularities may be filed
on paper, and that 15 of the 30
responses for the other items in this
collection will also be filed on paper, for
a total of approximately 68 of the 5,330
total responses per year being submitted
by mail. The average first-class postage
cost for a mailed submission will be 75
cents, for a total postage cost of
approximately $51 per year.
The total non-hour respondent cost
burden for this collection in the form of
filing fees and postage costs is estimated
to be $529,701 per year.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, e.g., the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
5,330
Fee amount
Dated: January 30, 2009.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief
Information Officer, Customer Information
Services Group, Public Information Services
Division.
[FR Doc. E9–2539 Filed 2–5–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:16 Feb 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
ACTION:
Notice.
The Department of Defense has
submitted to OMB for clearance, the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
comments received by March 9, 2009.
Title, Form, and OMB Number:
Industry Cost Collection Report Survey;
OMB Control Number 0704–TBD.
Type of Request: New.
Number of Respondents: 1,613.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 1,613.
Average Burden per Response: 30
minutes.
Annual Burden Hours: 807.
Needs and Uses: Executive Order
12829, ‘‘National Industrial Security
Program’’ requires the Department of
Defense to account each year for the
costs associated with implementation of
the National Industrial Security Program
and report those costs to the Director of
the Information Security Oversight
Office (ISOO). In furtherance of this
requirement, and pursuant with 32 CFR,
Subpart F, section 2001.61(b); Classified
National Security Information; Final
Rule, the Secretary of Defense, acting as
executive agent for the NISP, is
obligated to collect cost estimates for
classification-related activities of
contractors, licensees, certificate
holders, and grantees and report them to
ISOO annually. The cost collection
methodology employed since 1996 was
validated with the ISOO in December
2007. Participation in the survey is
strictly voluntary. Input is integrated
into a total cost figure for the President
and is never associated with a specific
facility.
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet
Seehra.
Written comments and
recommendations on the proposed
information collection should be sent to
Ms. Seehra at the Office of Management
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10236, New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503.
You may also submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by the following method:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, docket
number and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
DoD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia
Toppings.
Written requests for copies of the
information collection proposal should
be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/
Information Management Division, 1777
North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000,
Arlington, VA 22209–2133.
Dated: January 30, 2009.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9–2491 Filed 2–5–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
Defense Task Force on Sexual Assault
in the Military Services
AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of
Defense (Personnel and Readiness);
DoD.
ACTION: Committee meeting.
SUMMARY: On January 29, 2009 (74 FR
5149), the Department of Defense
announced a meeting of the Defense
Task Force on Sexual Assault in the
Military Services. This notice is
published to provide the correct address
of the meeting location. All other
information remains the same.
ADDRESSES: Coronado Island Marriott,
2000 Second Street, Marius Room,
Coronado, California 92118.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colonel Jackson-Chandler, Designated
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 24 (Friday, February 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6269-6271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2539]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Madrid Protocol
ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the revision of a continuing information
collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public
Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before April 7, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
E-mail: Susan.Fawcett@uspto.gov. Include ``0651-0051
comment'' in the subject line of the message.
Fax: 571-273-0112, marked to the attention of Susan K.
Fawcett.
Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, Office of the
Chief Information Officer, Customer Information Services Group, Public
Information Services Division, United States Patent and Trademark
Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be directed to Jennifer Chicoski, Attorney Advisor, Office of
the Commissioner for Trademarks, United States Patent and Trademark
Office, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, VA 22313-1451; by telephone at 571-
272-8943; or by e-mail to Jennifer.Chicoski@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
This collection of information is required by the Trademark Act of
1946, 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq., which provides for the Federal
registration of trademarks, service marks, collective trademarks and
service marks, collective membership marks, and certification marks.
Individuals and businesses that use or intend to use such marks in
commerce may file an application to register the marks with the United
States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
The Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement Concerning the
International Registration of Marks (``Madrid Protocol'') is an
international treaty that allows a trademark owner to seek registration
in any of the participating countries by filing a single international
application. The International Bureau (``IB'') of the World
Intellectual Property Organization (``WIPO'') in Geneva, Switzerland,
administers the international registration system. The Madrid Protocol
Implementation Act of 2002 amended the Trademark Act to provide that:
(1) The owner of a U.S. application or registration may seek protection
of its mark in any of the participating countries by submitting a
single international application to the IB through the USPTO, and (2)
the holder of an international registration may request an extension of
protection of the international registration to the United States. The
Madrid Protocol became effective in the United States on November 2,
2003, and is implemented under 15 U.S.C. 1141 et seq. and 37 CFR Part 2
and Part 7.
An international application submitted through the USPTO must be
based on an active U.S. application or registration and must be filed
by the owner of the application or registration. The USPTO reviews the
international application to certify that it corresponds to the data
contained in the existing U.S. application or registration before
forwarding the international application to the IB. The IB then reviews
the international application to determine whether the Madrid filing
requirements have been met and the required fees have been paid. If the
international application is unacceptable, the IB will send a notice of
irregularity to the USPTO and the applicant. The applicant must respond
to the irregularities to avoid abandonment, unless a response from the
USPTO is required. After any irregularities are corrected and the
application is accepted, the IB registers the mark, publishes the
registration in the WIPO Gazette of International Marks, and sends a
certificate to the holder.
When the mark is registered, the IB notifies each country
designated in the application of the request for extension of
protection. Once an international registration has been issued, the
holder may also file subsequent designations to request an extension of
protection to additional countries.
Under Section 71 of the Trademark Act, a registered extension of
protection to the United States will be cancelled unless the holder of
the international registration periodically files affidavits of
continued use in commerce or excusable nonuse. These affidavits cannot
be filed until five years after the USPTO registers an extension of
protection. Since the USPTO will not be
[[Page 6270]]
accepting these affidavits until February 1, 2010, the estimated burden
for these affidavits will not be included in this collection at this
time.
This collection includes the information necessary for the USPTO to
process applications for international registration and related
requests under the Madrid Protocol. The USPTO provides electronic forms
for filing the Application for International Registration, Subsequent
Designation, and Response to a Notice of Irregularity online through
the USPTO Web site. An electronic form for the Request for
Transformation is under development. Applicants may also submit the
items in this collection on paper or by using the forms provided by the
IB, which are available on the WIPO Web site. The IB requires
Applications for International Registration and Subsequent Designations
that are filed on paper to be submitted on the official IB forms.
II. Method of Collection
By mail, hand delivery, or electronically to the USPTO.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651-0051.
Form Number(s): PTO-2131, PTO-2132, PTO-2133.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Individuals or households; businesses or other
for-profits; and not-for-profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 5,330 responses per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that it will take
the public approximately 15 minutes (0.25 hours) to one hour to
complete the information in this collection, including the time to
gather the necessary information, prepare the documents, and submit the
completed request to the USPTO.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours: 1,347 hours per
year.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost Burden: $417,570 per year.
The USPTO expects that the information in this collection will be
prepared by attorneys. Using the professional rate of $310 per hour for
attorneys in private firms, the USPTO estimates that the respondent
cost burden for submitting the information in this collection will be
approximately $417,570 per year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Estimated
Item Estimated time for response annual annual burden
responses hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Application for International Registration 15 minutes....................... 3,900 975
(PTO-2131).
Subsequent Designation (PTO-2132)............ 15 minutes....................... 400 100
Response to Notice of Irregularity (PTO-2133) 15 minutes....................... 1,000 250
Request that the USPTO Replace a U.S. 30 minutes....................... 4 2
Registration with a Subsequently Registered
Extension of Protection to the United States.
Request to Record an Assignment or 30 minutes....................... 5 3
Restriction of a Holder's Right to Dispose
of an International Registration.
Request that the USPTO Transform a Cancelled 15 minutes....................... 6 2
Extension of Protection into an Application
for Registration under Section 1 or 44 of
the Act.
Petition to Review Refusal to Certify an 1 hour........................... 15 15
International Application.
Affidavit of Continued Use or Excusable 15 minutes....................... (\1\) 0
Nonuse under Section 71 of the Act.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................... ................................. 5,330 1,347
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Not until Feb. 2010.
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour Respondent Cost Burden: $529,701
per year. There are no capital start-up, maintenance, or recordkeeping
costs associated with this information collection. However, this
collection does have annual (non-hour) costs in the form of filing fees
and postage costs.
The USPTO charges fees for processing international applications
and related requests under the Madrid Protocol as set forth in 37 CFR
7.6. In addition to these USPTO fees, applicants must also pay
international filing fees to the IB as indicated in 37 CFR 7.7. The
USPTO estimates that the total filing fees in the form of USPTO
processing fees associated with this collection will be approximately
$529,650 per year as calculated in the accompanying table.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Estimated
Item annual Fee amount annual filing
responses costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Application for International Registration, for certifying an 2,000 $100.00 $200,000.00
international application based on a single basic application
or registration (per international class)......................
Application for International Registration, for certifying an 1,900 150.00 285,000.00
international application based on more than one basic
application or registration (per international class)..........
Subsequent Designation.......................................... 400 100.00 40,000.00
Response to Notice of Irregularity.............................. 1,000 0.00 0.00
Request that the USPTO Replace a U.S. Registration with a 4 100.00 400.00
Subsequently Registered Extension of Protection to the United
States (per international class)...............................
Request to Record an Assignment or Restriction of a Holder's 5 100.00 500.00
Right to Dispose of an International Registration..............
Request that the USPTO Transform a Cancelled Extension of 6 375.00 2,250.00
Protection into an Application for Registration under Section 1
or 44 of the Act...............................................
Petition to Review Refusal to Certify an International 15 100.00 1,500.00
Application....................................................
Affidavit of Continued Use or Excusable Nonuse under Section 71 \1\ 100.00 0.00
of the Act (per international class)...........................
-----------------------------------------------
[[Page 6271]]
Total....................................................... 5,330 .............. 529,650.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Not until Feb. 2010.
The public may submit the items in this collection to the USPTO by
mail through the United States Postal Service. The USPTO estimates that
approximately 1% (53 out of 5,300) of the international applications,
subsequent designations, and responses to notices of irregularities may
be filed on paper, and that 15 of the 30 responses for the other items
in this collection will also be filed on paper, for a total of
approximately 68 of the 5,330 total responses per year being submitted
by mail. The average first-class postage cost for a mailed submission
will be 75 cents, for a total postage cost of approximately $51 per
year.
The total non-hour respondent cost burden for this collection in
the form of filing fees and postage costs is estimated to be $529,701
per year.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, e.g., the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: January 30, 2009.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer,
Customer Information Services Group, Public Information Services
Division.
[FR Doc. E9-2539 Filed 2-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P