Action Affecting Export Privileges: Theresa Huei-Min Chang, 6134-6136 [E9-2319]
Download as PDF
6134
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 23 / Thursday, February 5, 2009 / Notices
LIST OF PETITIONS RECEIVED BY EDA FOR CERTIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY TO APPLY FOR TRADE ADJUSTMENT—
Continued
[12/9/2008 through 1/31/2009]
Date accepted
for filing
Firm
Address
McBain Instruments, LP
2665 Park Center Drive, Simi Valley, CA 93065
12/30/2008
AirFlo Cooling Technologies, LLC.
Engineered Plastic Products Corporation.
728 S. Wheeling Ave., Tulsa, OK 74104 .............
12/10/2008
2542 Pratt Boulevard, Elk Grove, IL 60007 .........
12/12/2008
Systematix Controls, Inc
670 Industry Drive, Box, Tukwila, WA 98188 ......
1/8/2009
Solar Innovations, Inc ....
234 E. Rosebud Road, Myerstown, PA 17067 ....
1/9/2009
Kingfisher Kookers ........
Eglomise Designs, Inc ...
201 N 13th Street, Kingfisher, OK 73750 ............
4 Antietam Street, Devens, MA 01434 ................
1/7/2009
12/30/2008
Any party having a substantial
interest in these proceedings may
request a public hearing on the matter.
A written request for a hearing must be
submitted to the Office of Performance
Evaluation, Room 7009, Economic
Development Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, Washington,
DC 20230, no later than ten (10)
calendar days following publication of
this notice. Please follow the procedures
set forth in Section 315.9 of EDA’s final
rule (71 FR 56704) for procedures for
requesting a public hearing. The Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance official
program number and title of the
program under which these petitions are
submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
Dated: January 30, 2009.
William P. Kittredge,
Program Officer for TAA.
[FR Doc. E9–2445 Filed 2–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket 2–2009]
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Foreign-Trade Zone 122—Corpus
Christi, TX; Request for Manufacturing
Authority; Excalibar Minerals, LLC
An application has been submitted to
the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board
(the Board) by the Port of Corpus Christi
authority, grantee of FTZ 122,
requesting authority on behalf of
Excalibar Minerals, LLC (Excalibar) to
perform barite milling under FTZ
procedures within FTZ 122. The
application was submitted pursuant to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:34 Feb 04, 2009
Jkt 217001
the provisions of the Foreign-Trade
Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–
81u), and the regulations of the Board
(15 CFR part 400). It was formally filed
on January 29, 2009.
Excalibar has also applied for
temporary/interim manufacturing
authority at the Corpus Christi facility.
The application was formally filed on
November 20, 2008 (Docket T–5–2008,
73 FR 73242, 12/2/08).
The Excalibar facility (14 employees)
is located at 3202 E. Navigation
Boulevard in Corpus Christi, Texas
(within Site 1). Under FTZ procedures,
Excalibar would produce up to 175,000
tons of ground barite (HTSUS
2511.10.10) annually, primarily for the
U.S. market. The foreign component
that would be used in production
(representing approximately 95 percent
of total material inputs) is raw barite
(HTSUS 2511.10.50), dutiable at $1.25
per metric ton.
FTZ procedures could exempt
Excalibar from customs duty payments
on the foreign component used in
export production (less than 1 percent
of shipments). On domestic sales,
Excalibar would be able to choose the
duty rate that applies to the finished
product (duty-free) for the foreign input
noted above that has a higher duty rate.
The company may also realize certain
logistical/procedural savings as well as
savings on materials that become scrap/
waste during manufacturing.
In accordance with the Board’s
regulations, Christopher Kemp of the
FTZ staff is designated examiner to
investigate the application and report to
the Board.
Public comment is invited from
interested parties. Submissions (original
and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Products
Microscopy measuring systems to customer
specifications. Production consists of engineering design, software programming, component
assembly, testing and delivery.
Fans and blowers.
Custom plastic parts and manifolds and plastic
turning, plastic milling, and plastic screw machining.
Kappa analyzers and their parts, used in the recovery area of pulp and paper mills.
Doors, windows, skylights, aluminum sunrooms,
folding walls, and greenhouses.
Food smokers, barbeques, and gas grills.
Mirrors, pictures, paperweights, desk boxes,
photo frames, desk clocks and stationary.
Board’s Executive Secretary at the
address listed below. The closing period
for their receipt is April 6, 2009.
Rebuttal comments in response to
material submitted during the foregoing
period may be submitted during the
subsequent 15-day period to April 21,
2009.
A copy of the application will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Executive Secretary,
Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 2111,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230–0002, and in the ‘‘Reading
Room’’ section of the Board’s Web site,
which is accessible via https://
www.trade.gov/ftz. For further
information, contact Christopher Kemp
at christopher_kemp@ita.doc.gov or
(202) 482–0862.
Dated: January 29, 2009.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–2480 Filed 2–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Action Affecting Export Privileges:
Theresa Huei-Min Chang
In the Matter of: Theresa Huei-Min Chang,
11816 Pine Brook Court, Cupertino,
California 95014 Respondent.
Order Relating to Theresa Huei-Min
Chang
The Bureau of Industry and Security,
U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’)
has notified Theresa Huei-Min Chang
(hereinafter referred to as ‘‘Chang’’), of
E:\FR\FM\05FEN1.SGM
05FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 23 / Thursday, February 5, 2009 / Notices
its intention to initiate an administrative
proceeding against her pursuant to
Section 766.3 of the Export
Administration Regulations
(‘‘Regulations’’) 1 and Section 13(c) of
the Export Administration Act of 1979,
as amended (‘‘Act’’) 2, through issuance
of a proposed charging letter to Chang
that alleged that she committed three
violations of the Regulations.
Specifically, these charges are:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Charge 1: 15 CFR 764.2(d)—Conspiracy
To Export Items From the United States
to Taiwan Without the Required
License
Beginning in or about 2003 and
continuing through on or about July 29,
2006, Chang conspired and acted in
concert with others, known and
unknown, to violate the Regulations and
to bring about an act that constitutes a
violation of the Regulations. The
purpose of the conspiracy was to export
items from the United States to Taiwan
without the required U.S. Government
authorization. Pursuant to Sections
742.2 or 742.3 of the Regulations,
authorization was required from the
Department of Commerce before certain
chemicals, metals, and electronic
components, items subject to the
Regulations and classified under Export
Control Classification Numbers
(‘‘ECCNs’’) 1C227, 1C299, 1C230,
1C231, 1C234, 1C240, 1C350, and
3A201, could be exported from the
United States to Taiwan. In furtherance
of the conspiracy, the conspirators,
including Chang, participated in a
scheme in which a Taiwan company
requested that an affiliated U.S.
company, managed by Chang, procure
specific items from U.S. suppliers and
export them to Taiwan. The Taiwan
company instructed the affiliated U.S.
company not to tell U.S. suppliers that
the affiliated U.S. company would
export the items. Pursuant to this
instruction, the affiliated U.S. company
procured the items and exported them
to Taiwan without the required license.
1 The Regulations are currently codified in the
Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR Parts 730–
774 (2008). The charged violation occurred in 2003
through 2006. The Regulations governing the
violation at issue are found in the 2003 through
2006 versions of the Code of Federal Regulations
(15 CFR Parts 730–774 (2003–2006)). The 2008
Regulations govern the procedural aspects of this
case.
2 50 U.S.C. app. section 240 1–2420 (2000). Since
August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the
President, through Executive Order 13222 of August
17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which
has been extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the most recent being that of July 23, 2008
(73 FR 43,603 (July 25, 2008)), has continued the
Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–
1706 (2000)).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:34 Feb 04, 2009
Jkt 217001
In so doing, Chang committed one
violation of Section 764.2(d) of the
Regulations.
Charge 2: 15 CFR 764.2(e)—Acting With
Knowledge of a Violation
On one occasion, on or about October
29, 2005, Chang ordered, bought, stored,
sold, and forwarded nickel powder, an
item that is subject to the Regulations
and classified under ECCN 1 C240, with
knowledge that a violation of the
Regulations was occurring. Specifically,
Chang ordered, bought, stored, sold, and
forwarded ten kilograms of nickel
powder with a value of approximately
$551.00. Chang had knowledge that said
item required a license for export to
Taiwan and that it was being exported
without the required license because
Chang had been told by an employee of
her company that an export of nickel
powder to Taiwan required a license. In
doing so, Chang committed one
violation of Section 764.2(e) of the
Regulations.
Charge 3: 15 CFR 764.2(g)—
Misrepresentation or Concealment of
Facts
On or about May 26, 2006, Chang
made a false or misleading statement to
officials of the U.S. Government in the
course of an investigation subject to the
Regulations. Specifically, in the course
of an interview conducted by Special
Agents of BIS’s Office of Export
Enforcement regarding unlicensed
exports to Taiwan, Chang stated that,
other than receiving payments for rent,
she did not receive compensation from
the Taiwanese company Gredmann/
Well Being Enterprise Co., Ltd. (‘‘Well
Being’’) for running Elecmat, a U.S.
company, and that she ran Elecmat as a
‘‘favor.’’ This statement was false or
misleading, as Chang knew that Well
Being transferred approximately $6,500
per month into a United Commercial
Bank account held in the name of
Chang’s brother, over which account
Chang exercised complete control,
which funds represented compensation
for Chang’s management of Elecmat. In
so doing, Chang committed one
violation of Section 764.2(g) of the
Regulations.
Whereas, BIS and Chang have entered
into a Settlement Agreement pursuant to
Section 766.18(a) of the Regulations
whereby they agreed to settle this matter
in accordance with the terms and
conditions set forth therein, and
Whereas, I have approved of the terms
of such Settlement Agreement; it is
therefore ordered:
First, that for a period of two years
from the date of entry of this Order,
Theresa Huei-Min Chang, (‘‘Chang’’),
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6135
her representatives, assigns, or agents
(‘‘Denied Person’’) may not participate,
directly or indirectly, in any way in any
transaction involving any commodity,
software or technology (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’)
exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the
Regulations and listed on the Commerce
Control List, set forth in Supplement
No. ito 15 CFR part 774, or in any other
activity subject to the Regulations that
involves an item listed on the
Commerce Control List, including, but
not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document that involves
an item that is subject to the Regulations
and listed on the Commerce Control
List;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations and listed on
the Commerce Control List, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations
that involves an item listed on the
Commerce Control List; or
C. Benefiting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations and
listed on the Commerce Control List, or
in any other activity subject to the
Regulations that involves an item listed
on the Commerce Control List.
Second, that no person may, directly
or indirectly, do any of the actions
described below with respect to an item
that is subject to the Regulations and
listed on the Commerce Control List that
has been, will be, or is intended to be
exported or reexported from the United
States:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of a Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations and listed on the
Commerce Control List;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
a Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations and listed on
the Commerce Control List that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby a Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from a Denied Person of any
E:\FR\FM\05FEN1.SGM
05FEN1
6136
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 23 / Thursday, February 5, 2009 / Notices
item subject to the Regulations and
listed on the Commerce Control List that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from a Denied Person in the
United States any item subject to the
Regulations and listed on the Commerce
Control List with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations and
listed on the Commerce Control List that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and that is owned,
possessed or controlled by a Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by a Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations and listed on
the Commerce Control List that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Third, that, after notice and
opportunity for comment as provided in
Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any
person, firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Chang by
affiliation, ownership, control, or
position of responsibility in the conduct
of trade or related services may also be
made subject to the provisions of the
Order.
Fourth, that the proposed charging
letter, the Settlement Agreement, and
this Order shall be made available to the
public.
Fifth, that this Order shall be served
on the Denied Person and on BIS, and
shall be published in the Federal
Register.
This Order, which constitutes the
final agency action in this matter, is
effective immediately.
Entered this 28th day of January 2009.
Kevin Delli-Colli,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Export
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E9–2319 Filed 2–4–09; 8:45 am]
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:34 Feb 04, 2009
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–549–817]
Certain Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat
Products from Thailand: Correction to
Preliminary Results of Changed
Circumstances Review and Intent To
Reinstate Sahaviriya Steel Industries
Public Company Limited in the
Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 30, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Drury or Angelica Mendoza, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0195 or (202) 482–
3019, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
corrected to read that a cash–deposit
requirement of 9.05 percent will be in
effect for all shipments of the subject
merchandise manufactured and
exported by SSI entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the publication date of the
Preliminary Results. Accordingly, the
Department will instruct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection to suspend
liquidation of all entries of subject
merchandise manufactured and
exported by SSI entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication of the
Preliminary Results at a rate of 9.05
percent.
This notice is published in
accordance with section 777(i) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
Dated: January 30, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. E9–2477 Filed 2–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
Correction
On December 30, 2008, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published a notice of
preliminary results of the changed
circumstances review of the
antidumping duty order on certain hot–
rolled carbon steel flat products from
Thailand. See Certain Hot–Rolled
Carbon Steel Flat Products from
Thailand: Preliminary Results of
Changed Circumstances Review and
Intent To Reinstate Sahaviriya Steel
Industries Public Company Limited in
the Antidumping Duty Order, 73 FR
79809 (December 30, 2008)
(‘‘Preliminary Results’’). Subsequent to
the publication of the Preliminary
Results in the Federal Register, we
identified an inadvertent error.
The Preliminary Results notice is
internally inconsistent. The Preliminary
Results correctly state that the
Department preliminarily determined a
weighted–average dumping margin of
9.05 percent covering Sahaviriya Steel
Industries Public Company Limited
(‘‘SSI’’) during the period July 1, 2006,
through June 30, 2007, but then
incorrectly state that a cash–deposit
requirement of 6.42 percent will be in
effect for all shipments of the subject
merchandise manufactured and
exported by SSI entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the publication date of the
Preliminary Results. See Preliminary
Results, 73 FR at 79814. To resolve this
discrepancy and prevent confusion, the
Preliminary Results notice is hereby
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–833]
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From
Taiwan: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review.
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
is conducting an administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on
certain polyester staple fiber from
Taiwan. The period of review (POR) is
May 1, 2007 through April 30, 2008.
This review covers imports of certain
polyester staple fiber from one
producer/exporter. We have
preliminarily found that sales of the
subject merchandise have been made
below normal value. If these
preliminary results are adopted in our
final results, we will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. Interested parties
are invited to comment on these
preliminary results. Parties who submit
comments in this review are requested
to submit with each argument (1) a
statement of the issue and (2) a brief
summary of the argument. We will issue
the final results not later than 120 days
after the date of publication of this
notice.
E:\FR\FM\05FEN1.SGM
05FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 23 (Thursday, February 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6134-6136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2319]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Action Affecting Export Privileges: Theresa Huei-Min Chang
In the Matter of: Theresa Huei-Min Chang, 11816 Pine Brook
Court, Cupertino, California 95014 Respondent.
Order Relating to Theresa Huei-Min Chang
The Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce
(``BIS'') has notified Theresa Huei-Min Chang (hereinafter referred to
as ``Chang''), of
[[Page 6135]]
its intention to initiate an administrative proceeding against her
pursuant to Section 766.3 of the Export Administration Regulations
(``Regulations'') \1\ and Section 13(c) of the Export Administration
Act of 1979, as amended (``Act'') \2\, through issuance of a proposed
charging letter to Chang that alleged that she committed three
violations of the Regulations. Specifically, these charges are:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations at 15 CFR Parts 730-774 (2008). The charged
violation occurred in 2003 through 2006. The Regulations governing
the violation at issue are found in the 2003 through 2006 versions
of the Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR Parts 730-774 (2003-
2006)). The 2008 Regulations govern the procedural aspects of this
case.
\2\ 50 U.S.C. app. section 240 1-2420 (2000). Since August 21,
2001, the Act has been in lapse and the President, through Executive
Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which
has been extended by successive Presidential Notices, the most
recent being that of July 23, 2008 (73 FR 43,603 (July 25, 2008)),
has continued the Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706 (2000)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge 1: 15 CFR 764.2(d)--Conspiracy To Export Items From the United
States to Taiwan Without the Required License
Beginning in or about 2003 and continuing through on or about July
29, 2006, Chang conspired and acted in concert with others, known and
unknown, to violate the Regulations and to bring about an act that
constitutes a violation of the Regulations. The purpose of the
conspiracy was to export items from the United States to Taiwan without
the required U.S. Government authorization. Pursuant to Sections 742.2
or 742.3 of the Regulations, authorization was required from the
Department of Commerce before certain chemicals, metals, and electronic
components, items subject to the Regulations and classified under
Export Control Classification Numbers (``ECCNs'') 1C227, 1C299, 1C230,
1C231, 1C234, 1C240, 1C350, and 3A201, could be exported from the
United States to Taiwan. In furtherance of the conspiracy, the
conspirators, including Chang, participated in a scheme in which a
Taiwan company requested that an affiliated U.S. company, managed by
Chang, procure specific items from U.S. suppliers and export them to
Taiwan. The Taiwan company instructed the affiliated U.S. company not
to tell U.S. suppliers that the affiliated U.S. company would export
the items. Pursuant to this instruction, the affiliated U.S. company
procured the items and exported them to Taiwan without the required
license. In so doing, Chang committed one violation of Section 764.2(d)
of the Regulations.
Charge 2: 15 CFR 764.2(e)--Acting With Knowledge of a Violation
On one occasion, on or about October 29, 2005, Chang ordered,
bought, stored, sold, and forwarded nickel powder, an item that is
subject to the Regulations and classified under ECCN 1 C240, with
knowledge that a violation of the Regulations was occurring.
Specifically, Chang ordered, bought, stored, sold, and forwarded ten
kilograms of nickel powder with a value of approximately $551.00. Chang
had knowledge that said item required a license for export to Taiwan
and that it was being exported without the required license because
Chang had been told by an employee of her company that an export of
nickel powder to Taiwan required a license. In doing so, Chang
committed one violation of Section 764.2(e) of the Regulations.
Charge 3: 15 CFR 764.2(g)--Misrepresentation or Concealment of Facts
On or about May 26, 2006, Chang made a false or misleading
statement to officials of the U.S. Government in the course of an
investigation subject to the Regulations. Specifically, in the course
of an interview conducted by Special Agents of BIS's Office of Export
Enforcement regarding unlicensed exports to Taiwan, Chang stated that,
other than receiving payments for rent, she did not receive
compensation from the Taiwanese company Gredmann/Well Being Enterprise
Co., Ltd. (``Well Being'') for running Elecmat, a U.S. company, and
that she ran Elecmat as a ``favor.'' This statement was false or
misleading, as Chang knew that Well Being transferred approximately
$6,500 per month into a United Commercial Bank account held in the name
of Chang's brother, over which account Chang exercised complete
control, which funds represented compensation for Chang's management of
Elecmat. In so doing, Chang committed one violation of Section 764.2(g)
of the Regulations.
Whereas, BIS and Chang have entered into a Settlement Agreement
pursuant to Section 766.18(a) of the Regulations whereby they agreed to
settle this matter in accordance with the terms and conditions set
forth therein, and
Whereas, I have approved of the terms of such Settlement Agreement;
it is therefore ordered:
First, that for a period of two years from the date of entry of
this Order, Theresa Huei-Min Chang, (``Chang''), her representatives,
assigns, or agents (``Denied Person'') may not participate, directly or
indirectly, in any way in any transaction involving any commodity,
software or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to as
``item'') exported or to be exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations and listed on the Commerce Control List, set
forth in Supplement No. ito 15 CFR part 774, or in any other activity
subject to the Regulations that involves an item listed on the Commerce
Control List, including, but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License
Exception, or export control document that involves an item that is
subject to the Regulations and listed on the Commerce Control List;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the Regulations and listed on the
Commerce Control List, or in any other activity subject to the
Regulations that involves an item listed on the Commerce Control List;
or
C. Benefiting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the Regulations and listed on the Commerce Control List, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations that involves an item listed
on the Commerce Control List.
Second, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
actions described below with respect to an item that is subject to the
Regulations and listed on the Commerce Control List that has been, will
be, or is intended to be exported or reexported from the United States:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of a Denied Person any item
subject to the Regulations and listed on the Commerce Control List;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by a Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or control
of any item subject to the Regulations and listed on the Commerce
Control List that has been or will be exported from the United States,
including financing or other support activities related to a
transaction whereby a Denied Person acquires or attempts to acquire
such ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from a Denied Person of any
[[Page 6136]]
item subject to the Regulations and listed on the Commerce Control List
that has been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from a Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the Regulations and listed on the Commerce Control List with
knowledge or reason to know that the item will be, or is intended to
be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the
Regulations and listed on the Commerce Control List that has been or
will be exported from the United States and that is owned, possessed or
controlled by a Denied Person, or service any item, of whatever origin,
that is owned, possessed or controlled by a Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item subject to the Regulations and
listed on the Commerce Control List that has been or will be exported
from the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means
installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing.
Third, that, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided
in Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any person, firm, corporation, or
business organization related to Chang by affiliation, ownership,
control, or position of responsibility in the conduct of trade or
related services may also be made subject to the provisions of the
Order.
Fourth, that the proposed charging letter, the Settlement
Agreement, and this Order shall be made available to the public.
Fifth, that this Order shall be served on the Denied Person and on
BIS, and shall be published in the Federal Register.
This Order, which constitutes the final agency action in this
matter, is effective immediately.
Entered this 28th day of January 2009.
Kevin Delli-Colli,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E9-2319 Filed 2-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M