Emerging Technology and Research Advisory Committee; Notice of Partially Closed Meeting, 5921 [E9-2266]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 21 / Tuesday, February 3, 2009 / Notices
recommended decision and order in which to
submit simultaneous responses. Parties
thereafter shall have eight days from receipt
of any response(s) in which to submit replies.
Any response or reply must be received
within the time specified by the Under
Secretary.
(c) Final decision. Within 30 days after
receipt of the recommended decision and
order, the Under Secretary shall issue a
written order affirming, modifying or
vacating the recommended decision and
order of the administrative law judge. If he/
she vacates the recommended decision and
order, the Under Secretary may refer the case
back to the administrative law judge for
further proceedings. Because of the time
limits, the Under Secretary’s review will
ordinarily be limited to the written record for
decision, including the transcript of any
hearing, and any submissions by the parties
concerning the recommended decision.
(d) Delivery. The final decision and
implementing order shall be served on the
parties and will be publicly available in
accordance with § 766.20 of this part.
(e) Appeals. The charged party may appeal
the Under Secretary’s written order within 15
days to the United States Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia pursuant to 50
U.S.C. app. 2412(c)(3).
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that I have served the
foregoing Recommended Decision and Order
as indicated below to the following person(s):
Mario Mancuso, Under Secretary of
Commerce for Industry and Security, U.S.
Department of Commerce, Room H–3892,
14th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230. (By Facsimile to
202–482–2387 and Federal Express.)
Charles G. Wall, Gregory Michelsen,
Attorneys for Bureau of Industry and
Security, Office of Chief Counsel for
Industry and Security, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Room 11–3 839, 14th Street &
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230. (By Facsimile to 202–482–0085
and Federal Express.)
Wayne LaFleur, 339 Torrey Pines Point,
Naples, FL 34113. (By Federal Express.)
Peter Goldsmith, 2627 Staples Avenue, Key
West, FL 33040. (By Federal Express.)
Michele Geslin, 2627 Staples Avenue, Key
West, FL 33040. (By Federal Express.)
Hearing Docket Clerk, ALJ Docketing Center,
40 S. Gay Street, Room 412, Baltimore,
Maryland 21202–4022. (By Facsimile to
410–962–1746 and Federal Express.)
Done and dated this 8th day of December
2008, New York, New York.
Regina V. Maye,
Paralegal Specialist to the Hon. Walter J.
Brudzinski, Administrative Law Judge.
[FR Doc. E9–654 Filed 2–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:18 Feb 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
5921
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
6. Public Comments and Questions.
Bureau of Industry and Security
Closed Session
7. Discussion of matters determined to
be exempt from the provisions relating
to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C.
app. 2 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).
The open session will be accessible
via teleconference to 20 participants on
a first come, first serve basis. To join the
conference, submit inquiries to Ms.
Yvette Springer at
Yspringer@bis.doc.gov no later than
February 3, 2009.
A limited number of seats will be
available for the public session.
Reservations are not accepted. To the
extent that time permits, members of the
public may present oral statements to
the Committee. The public may submit
written statements at any time before or
after the meeting. However, to facilitate
the distribution of public presentation
materials to the Committee members,
the Committee suggests that presenters
forward the public presentation
materials prior to the meeting to Ms.
Springer via e-mail.
The Assistant Secretary for
Administration, with the concurrence of
the delegate of the General Counsel,
formally determined on January 14,
2009, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. app. 2 (10)(d)), that
the portion of the meeting dealing with
matters the disclosure of which would
be likely to frustrate significantly
implementation of an agency action as
described in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) shall
be exempt from the provisions relating
to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C.
app. 2 10(a)1 and 10(a)(3). The
remaining portions of the meeting will
be open to the public.
For more information, call Yvette
Springer at (202) 482–2813.
Emerging Technology and Research
Advisory Committee; Notice of
Partially Closed Meeting
The Emerging Technology and
Research Advisory Committee (ETRAC)
will meet on February 10, 2009, 10:45
a.m., Room 4830, in the Herbert C.
Hoover Building, 14th Street between
Pennsylvania and Constitution
Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The
Committee advises the Office of the
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration on emerging technology
and research activities, including those
related to deemed exports.
Agenda
Open Session
1. State Department—What is ITAR
and its scope? What is the line of
demarcation of dual-use? Areas of
regulatory uncertainty. Importance of
deemed export controls on dual-use
technologies subject to the CCL.
2. BIS view: What are dual-use
technologies; how they differ from
ITAR; where regulatory jurisdiction
becomes fuzzy; jurisdictional issues on
how best to resolve the issues.
3. Deemed Exports—BIS National
Security & Technology Transfer
Controls
• What is a deemed export in all of
its flavors.
• What services does EA provide to
help academics and industry
researchers understand current
regulations and comply with these
rules.
4. BIS Export Enforcement (EE)—
deemed export rules for dual-use
technologies subject to EAR over 5
years.
• Describe the levels of violations;
prime reasons for violations.
• Typical EE responses.
• Frequency of prosecution.
• Real life examples.
5. ISTAC, MTAC briefings
• Approaches BIS/TACs use in
identifying, ranking, or prioritizing
technologies in terms of importance,
sensitivity, availability, etc.
• Describe decision trees, process
models, systematic processes individual
TACs.
• Discuss methods TACs use to
identify, rank, or prioritize technologies
that might be subject to deemed export
regulations.
• Describe types of guidance and
tools BIS provides to TACs to enable
sound decision making on imposition or
relaxation of deemed export regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: January 29, 2009.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–2266 Filed 2–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Materials Technical Advisory
Committee; Notice of Partially Closed
Meeting
The Materials Technical Advisory
Committee will meet on February 12,
2009, 10 a.m., Herbert C. Hoover
Building, Room 3884, 14th Street
between Constitution & Pennsylvania
Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The
Committee advises the Office of the
E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM
03FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 21 (Tuesday, February 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 5921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2266]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Emerging Technology and Research Advisory Committee; Notice of
Partially Closed Meeting
The Emerging Technology and Research Advisory Committee (ETRAC)
will meet on February 10, 2009, 10:45 a.m., Room 4830, in the Herbert
C. Hoover Building, 14th Street between Pennsylvania and Constitution
Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the Office of the
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on emerging technology
and research activities, including those related to deemed exports.
Agenda
Open Session
1. State Department--What is ITAR and its scope? What is the line
of demarcation of dual-use? Areas of regulatory uncertainty. Importance
of deemed export controls on dual-use technologies subject to the CCL.
2. BIS view: What are dual-use technologies; how they differ from
ITAR; where regulatory jurisdiction becomes fuzzy; jurisdictional
issues on how best to resolve the issues.
3. Deemed Exports--BIS National Security & Technology Transfer
Controls
What is a deemed export in all of its flavors.
What services does EA provide to help academics and
industry researchers understand current regulations and comply with
these rules.
4. BIS Export Enforcement (EE)--deemed export rules for dual-use
technologies subject to EAR over 5 years.
Describe the levels of violations; prime reasons for
violations.
Typical EE responses.
Frequency of prosecution.
Real life examples.
5. ISTAC, MTAC briefings
Approaches BIS/TACs use in identifying, ranking, or
prioritizing technologies in terms of importance, sensitivity,
availability, etc.
Describe decision trees, process models, systematic
processes individual TACs.
Discuss methods TACs use to identify, rank, or prioritize
technologies that might be subject to deemed export regulations.
Describe types of guidance and tools BIS provides to TACs
to enable sound decision making on imposition or relaxation of deemed
export regulations.
6. Public Comments and Questions.
Closed Session
7. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the
provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2
10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).
The open session will be accessible via teleconference to 20
participants on a first come, first serve basis. To join the
conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at
Yspringer@bis.doc.gov no later than February 3, 2009.
A limited number of seats will be available for the public session.
Reservations are not accepted. To the extent that time permits, members
of the public may present oral statements to the Committee. The public
may submit written statements at any time before or after the meeting.
However, to facilitate the distribution of public presentation
materials to the Committee members, the Committee suggests that
presenters forward the public presentation materials prior to the
meeting to Ms. Springer via e-mail.
The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of
the delegate of the General Counsel, formally determined on January 14,
2009, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act,
as amended (5 U.S.C. app. 2 (10)(d)), that the portion of the meeting
dealing with matters the disclosure of which would be likely to
frustrate significantly implementation of an agency action as described
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) shall be exempt from the provisions relating
to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 10(a)1 and 10(a)(3). The
remaining portions of the meeting will be open to the public.
For more information, call Yvette Springer at (202) 482-2813.
Dated: January 29, 2009.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-2266 Filed 2-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P
