Notice of Availability for the Draft White-Tailed Deer Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, IN, 5180-5181 [E9-1887]
Download as PDF
5180
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 18 / Thursday, January 29, 2009 / Notices
(8) Any individual or entity and any
Related Party (as such term is defined in
the Qualification Statement) of such
individual or entity that is a mortgagor
in any of HUD’s multifamily housing
programs and that is in default under
such mortgage loan or is in violation of
any regulatory or business agreements
with HUD, unless such default or
violation is cured on or before January
27, 2009;
(9) Any entity or individual that
serviced or held any Mortgage Loan at
any time during the 2-year period prior
to January 1, 2009, is ineligible to bid
on such Mortgage Loan or on the pool
containing such Mortgage Loan, but may
bid on loan pools that do not contain
Mortgage Loans that they have serviced
or held at any time during the 2-year
period prior to January 1, 2009; and
(10) Also ineligible to bid on any
Mortgage Loan are: (a) Any affiliate or
principal of any entity or individual
described in the preceding sentence
(paragraph 9); (b) any employee or
subcontractor of such entity or
individual during that 2-year period; or
(c) any entity or individual that employs
or uses the services of any other entity
or individual described in this
paragraph in preparing its bid on such
Mortgage Loan.
Prospective bidders should carefully
review the Qualification Statement to
determine whether they are eligible to
submit bids on the Mortgage Loans in
MHLS 2009–1.
Freedom of Information Act Requests
HUD reserves the right, in its sole and
absolute discretion, to disclose
information regarding MHLS 2009–1,
including, but not limited to, the
identity of any successful bidder and its
bid price or bid percentage for any pool
of loans or individual loan, upon the
closing of the sale of all the Mortgage
Loans. Even if HUD elects not to
publicly disclose any information
relating to MHLS 2009–1, HUD will
have the right to disclose any
information that HUD is obligated to
disclose pursuant to the Freedom of
Information Act and all regulations
promulgated there under.
Scope of Notice
rmajette on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
This notice applies to MHLS 2009–1
and does not establish HUD’s policy for
the sale of other mortgage loans.
Dated: January 23, 2009.
Ronald Y. Spraker,
Acting General Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Housing.
[FR Doc. E9–1927 Filed 1–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:25 Jan 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
Should you require reasonable
accommodation, please contact the
Bureau of Land Management
Lakeview District BLM at (541) 947–
[L10200000–MJ0000–LLORL00100; HAG 09– 2177 as soon as possible.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
0062]
Southeast Oregon Resource Advisory
Council: Meeting
Dated: January 20, 2009.
Carol A. Benkosky,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. E9–1896 Filed 1–28–09; 8:45 am]
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Southeast Oregon Resource
Advisory Council: Meeting.
BILLING CODE 4310–33–P
Pursuant to the Federal Advisory
Committee Act, the Department of the
Interior Bureau of Land Management
(BLM) announces the following
advisory committee meeting:
Name: Southeast Oregon Resource
Advisory Council (SEORAC).
Time and Date: 1 p.m. February 26,
2009; 8 a.m. February 27, 2009.
Place: Best Western Rory and Ryan
Inns, 534 Highway 20 N, Hines, Oregon
97738.
Status: Open to the public.
SUMMARY: The SEORAC will be briefed
on BLM’s wild horse and burro
program, BLM’s sagebrush habitat
treatments and the current status of the
Oregon Explorer grant. Council
members will also provide orientation
to new members, conduct chair
elections, establish their 2009 annual
work plan and meeting schedule,
receive organizational updates from
designated federal officials, give interest
area updates, implement a subgroup
establishment process, identify new
subgroup members, present active
subgroup reports and develop agenda
items for the next meeting. Any other
matters that may reasonably come
before the SEORAC may also be
addressed.
The public is welcome to attend all
portions of the meeting and may
contribute during the public comment
period at 11 a.m. on February 27, 2009.
Those who verbally address the
SEORAC during the public comment
period are asked to provide a written
statement of their comments or
presentation. Unless otherwise
approved by the SEORAC chair, the
public comment period will last no
longer than 30 minutes, and each
speaker may address the SEORAC for a
maximum of five minutes.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Program information, meeting records
and a roster of council members may be
obtained from Scott Stoffel, Public
Affairs Specialist, 1301 South G Street,
Lakeview, OR 97630, (541) 947–6237.
The meeting agenda will be posted at
https://www.blm.gov/or/rac/seorracminutes.php when available.
National Park Service
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Notice of Availability for the Draft
White-Tailed Deer Management Plan/
Environmental Impact Statement,
Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, IN
National Park Service.
Notice of Availability for the
Draft White-tailed Deer Management
Plan/Environmental Impact Statement,
Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore,
Indiana.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)), the
National Park Service (NPS) announces
the availability of a draft White-tailed
Deer Management Plan and
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore,
Indiana (Lakeshore).
DATES: The draft EIS will remain
available for public review for 60 days
following the publishing of the notice of
availability in the Federal Register by
the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. A public meeting will be held
during the 60-day review period, but the
specific date and location will be
announced in local and regional media
sources of record and on the Lakeshore
Web site.
You may submit your comments by
any one of several methods. You may
comment via the Internet through the
NPS Planning, Environment, and Public
Comment Web site (https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/indu); simply
click on the link to the White-tailed
Deer Management Plan. You may mail
comments to Superintendent
Constantine Dillon, Indiana Dunes
National Lakeshore, 1100 North Mineral
Springs Road, Porter, Indiana 46304.
You may send comments by facsimile to
219–395–1550. Finally, you may handdeliver comments to the Lakeshore
headquarters at the address above.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the draft EIS are
available from the Superintendent,
Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, 1100
North Mineral Springs Road, Porter,
Indiana 46304.
E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM
29JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 18 / Thursday, January 29, 2009 / Notices
This EIS
and plan describes four alternatives for
the management of deer at the
Lakeshore. Action is needed at this time
to ensure that the local deer population
does not become a dominant force that
negatively influences ecosystem
components within the Lakeshore, such
as sensitive vegetation or other wildlife.
Impacts to these Lakeshore resources
would compromise the Lakeshore’s
purpose to preserve the exceptional
biodiversity found within its
boundaries. The Lakeshore staff
currently implements resource
management actions to protect other
resources but no specific deer
management plan exists.
Under Alternative A (no action),
current deer management actions
(including limited fencing, limited use
of repellents, and inventorying and
monitoring efforts) would continue; no
new deer management actions would be
taken. Alternative B would include all
actions described under alternative A,
but would also incorporate non-lethal
actions to possibly reduce deer numbers
in the Lakeshore. The additional actions
would include the construction of
additional small- and new large-scale
exclosures, more extensive use of
repellents in areas where fenced
exclosures would not be appropriate or
feasible, and phasing in reproductive
control of does when there is a federally
approved fertility control agent for
application to free-ranging populations
that provides multi-year (more than four
years) efficacy for does. Alternative C
would include all actions described
under alternative A, but would also
incorporate a direct reduction of the
deer herd size through sharpshooting
and capture/euthanasia, where
appropriate. Alternative D would also
include all the actions described under
alternative A, but would incorporate a
combination of specific lethal and nonlethal actions from alternatives B and C.
These actions would include the
reduction of the deer herd through
sharpshooting, in combination with
capture/euthanasia and phasing in
reproductive control of does (as
described in alternative B) for longerterm maintenance of lower herd
numbers when there is a federally
approved fertility control agent for
application to free-ranging populations
that provides multi-year (more than four
years) efficacy for does.
The potential environmental
consequences of the alternatives are
addressed for vegetation, soils and water
quality, white-tailed deer, other wildlife
and wildlife habitat, sensitive and rare
species, archeological resources,
cultural landscapes, visitor use and
rmajette on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:25 Jan 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
experience, social values, visitor and
employee health and safety,
soundscapes, socioeconomic conditions,
and national Lakeshore management
and operations.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Contact Superintendent Dillon at the
address above or by telephone at 219–
926–7561.
Before including your address,
telephone number, electronic mail
address, or other personal identifying
information in your comments, you
should be aware that your entire
comment (including your personal
identifying information) may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comments to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. We will make all submissions
from organizations or businesses, from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials, of
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
Dated: October 20, 2008.
Ernest Quintana,
Director, Midwest Region.
Editorial Note: This document was
received in the Office of the Federal Register
on January 26, 2009.
[FR Doc. E9–1887 Filed 1–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–FH–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1014, 1016,
1017 (Review)]
In the Matter of Polyvinyl Alcohol From
China, Japan, and Korea; Notice of
Commission Determination To
Conduct a Portion of the Hearing in
camera
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Closure of a portion of a
Commission hearing.
SUMMARY: Upon its own initiative, the
Commission has determined to conduct
a portion of its hearing in the abovecaptioned reviews scheduled for
January 27, 2009, in camera. See
Commission rules 207.24(d), 207.66(b),
201.13(m) and 201.36(b)(4) (19 CFR
207.24(d), 207.66(b), 201.13(m) and
201.36(b)(4)). The remainder of the
hearing will be open to the public. The
Commission has determined that the
seven-day advance notice of the change
to a meeting was not possible. See
Commission rule 201.35(a), (c)(1) (19
CFR 201.35(a), (c)(1)).
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5181
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Jane Alves, Office of the General
Counsel, United States International
Trade Commission, 202–708–2969.
Hearing-impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter
may be obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–3105.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In these
reviews, there are only three domestic
PVA producers, of which only two sell
in the commercial market. There is only
one producer of subject merchandise in
Korea. Only one of several foreign
producers in China and only one of four
producers of subject merchandise in
Japan submitted questionnaire
responses in these reviews. In addition,
there are only a limited number of
importers of polyvinyl alcohol into the
United States. Because much of the data
in these reviews is confidential, the
Commission believes that a closed
session is justified by the need to
discuss data that involve business
proprietary information (BPI)
concerning imports, individual foreign
industries, the domestic industry, and
prices. In making this decision, the
Commission nevertheless reaffirms its
belief that whenever possible its
business should be conducted in public.
The hearing will include the usual
public presentations by parties
supporting continuation of the
antidumping duty orders and those in
support of revocation of these orders,
with questions from the Commission. In
addition, the hearing will include a ten
minute in camera session for a
confidential presentation by parties
supporting revocation of the
antidumping duty orders. This session
will be followed by questions from the
Commission relating to the BPI and a
ten-minute in camera rebuttal
presentation by parties supporting
continuation of the orders, if needed.
Following the in camera session, the
Commission will reopen the hearing to
the public for the public rebuttal/closing
statements. During the in camera
session, the room will be cleared of all
persons except those who have been
granted access to BPI under a
Commission administrative protective
order (APO) and are included on the
Commission’s APO service list in these
reviews. See 19 CFR 201.35(b). The time
for the parties’ presentations and
rebuttals in the in camera session will
be taken from their respective overall
time allotments for the hearing. All
persons planning to attend the in
camera portions of the hearing should
be prepared to present proper
identification.
E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM
29JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 18 (Thursday, January 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5180-5181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1887]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Notice of Availability for the Draft White-Tailed Deer Management
Plan/Environmental Impact Statement, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore,
IN
AGENCY: National Park Service.
ACTION: Notice of Availability for the Draft White-tailed Deer
Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement, Indiana Dunes National
Lakeshore, Indiana.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)), the National Park Service
(NPS) announces the availability of a draft White-tailed Deer
Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Indiana
Dunes National Lakeshore, Indiana (Lakeshore).
DATES: The draft EIS will remain available for public review for 60
days following the publishing of the notice of availability in the
Federal Register by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. A public
meeting will be held during the 60-day review period, but the specific
date and location will be announced in local and regional media sources
of record and on the Lakeshore Web site.
You may submit your comments by any one of several methods. You may
comment via the Internet through the NPS Planning, Environment, and
Public Comment Web site (https://parkplanning.nps.gov/indu); simply
click on the link to the White-tailed Deer Management Plan. You may
mail comments to Superintendent Constantine Dillon, Indiana Dunes
National Lakeshore, 1100 North Mineral Springs Road, Porter, Indiana
46304. You may send comments by facsimile to 219-395-1550. Finally, you
may hand-deliver comments to the Lakeshore headquarters at the address
above.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the draft EIS are available from the
Superintendent, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, 1100 North Mineral
Springs Road, Porter, Indiana 46304.
[[Page 5181]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This EIS and plan describes four
alternatives for the management of deer at the Lakeshore. Action is
needed at this time to ensure that the local deer population does not
become a dominant force that negatively influences ecosystem components
within the Lakeshore, such as sensitive vegetation or other wildlife.
Impacts to these Lakeshore resources would compromise the Lakeshore's
purpose to preserve the exceptional biodiversity found within its
boundaries. The Lakeshore staff currently implements resource
management actions to protect other resources but no specific deer
management plan exists.
Under Alternative A (no action), current deer management actions
(including limited fencing, limited use of repellents, and inventorying
and monitoring efforts) would continue; no new deer management actions
would be taken. Alternative B would include all actions described under
alternative A, but would also incorporate non-lethal actions to
possibly reduce deer numbers in the Lakeshore. The additional actions
would include the construction of additional small- and new large-scale
exclosures, more extensive use of repellents in areas where fenced
exclosures would not be appropriate or feasible, and phasing in
reproductive control of does when there is a federally approved
fertility control agent for application to free-ranging populations
that provides multi-year (more than four years) efficacy for does.
Alternative C would include all actions described under alternative A,
but would also incorporate a direct reduction of the deer herd size
through sharpshooting and capture/euthanasia, where appropriate.
Alternative D would also include all the actions described under
alternative A, but would incorporate a combination of specific lethal
and non-lethal actions from alternatives B and C. These actions would
include the reduction of the deer herd through sharpshooting, in
combination with capture/euthanasia and phasing in reproductive control
of does (as described in alternative B) for longer-term maintenance of
lower herd numbers when there is a federally approved fertility control
agent for application to free-ranging populations that provides multi-
year (more than four years) efficacy for does.
The potential environmental consequences of the alternatives are
addressed for vegetation, soils and water quality, white-tailed deer,
other wildlife and wildlife habitat, sensitive and rare species,
archeological resources, cultural landscapes, visitor use and
experience, social values, visitor and employee health and safety,
soundscapes, socioeconomic conditions, and national Lakeshore
management and operations.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Superintendent Dillon at the
address above or by telephone at 219-926-7561.
Before including your address, telephone number, electronic mail
address, or other personal identifying information in your comments,
you should be aware that your entire comment (including your personal
identifying information) may be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comments to withhold your personal
identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so. We will make all submissions from organizations
or businesses, from individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials, of organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
Dated: October 20, 2008.
Ernest Quintana,
Director, Midwest Region.
Editorial Note: This document was received in the Office of the
Federal Register on January 26, 2009.
[FR Doc. E9-1887 Filed 1-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FH-P