National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List, 4687-4691 [E9-1704]
Download as PDF
4687
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 74, No. 16
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1989–0008; FRL–8761–2]
National Oil and Hazardous Substance
Pollution Contingency Plan; National
Priorities List
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Direct final Notice of Partial
Deletion of the Rentokil, Inc. (Virginia
Wood Preserving Division) Superfund
Site from the National Priorities List.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region 3 is publishing a
direct final Notice of Partial Deletion of
former Wetland Areas B and C of the
Rentokil, Inc. (Virginia Wood Preserving
Division) Superfund Site (Site), located
in Henrico County, near the city of
Richmond, Virginia, from the National
Priorities List (NPL). The NPL,
promulgated pursuant to section 105 of
the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is
Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300, which
is the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP). This direct final partial deletion
is being published by EPA with the
concurrence of the Commonwealth of
Virginia, through the Virginia
Department of Environmental Quality
(VDEQ) because EPA has determined
that all appropriate response actions at
these identified parcels under CERCLA,
other than operation and maintenance
and five-year reviews, have been
completed. However, this partial
deletion does not preclude future
actions under Superfund.
This partial deletion pertains to the
soil and sediment of former Wetland
Areas B and C and the ground water at
former Wetland Area C. The remaining
areas and media of the Site will remain
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:08 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
on the NPL and are not being
considered for deletion as part of this
action.
DATES: This direct final partial deletion
is effective March 30, 2009 unless EPA
receives adverse comments by February
26, 2009. If adverse comments are
received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final partial
deletion in the Federal Register
informing the public that the partial
deletion will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–
SFUND–1989–0008, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: Larry C. Johnson,
Community Involvement Coordinator at
Johnson.larryc@epa.gov or Andy
Palestini, Remedial Project Manager at
Palestini.andy@epa.gov.
• Fax: 1–215–814–3002.
• Mail: Larry C. Johnson, Community
Involvement Coordinator, U.S. EPA
Region 3, Mailcode 3HS52,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
• Hand delivery: Larry C. Johnson,
Community Involvement Coordinator,
U.S. EPA Region 3, Mailcode 3HS52,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1989–
0008. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at:
U.S. EPA Region 3 Library, U.S. EPA
Region 3, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103–
2029, (215) 814–5000, Monday through
Friday 8 a.m. to 12 p.m.; Henrico
County Municipal Reference and Law
Library, Parham Road at Hungary Spring
Road, Richmond, Virginia 23273.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andy Palestini, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 3, 3HS23, 1650 Arch
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103, 215–814–3233.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Partial Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Partial Site Deletion
V. Deletion Action
I. Introduction
EPA Region 3 is publishing this direct
final Notice of Partial Deletion for the
Rentokil, Inc. (Virginia Wood Preserving
Division) Superfund Site (Site), from the
National Priorities List (NPL). This
partial deletion pertains to the soil and
sediment of former Wetland Areas B
and C and the ground water at former
Wetland Area C. The NPL constitutes
Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300, which
E:\FR\FM\27JAR1.SGM
27JAR1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
4688
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
is the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP), that EPA promulgated pursuant
to Section 105 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 9605. EPA
identifies sites that appear to present a
significant risk to public health, welfare,
or the environment and maintains the
NPL as the list of these sites. Sites on
the NPL may be the subject of remedial
actions financed by the Hazardous
Substance Superfund (Fund). This
partial deletion of the Rentokil, Inc.
(Virginia Wood Preserving Division)
Superfund Site is proposed in
accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e) and
is consistent with the Notice of Policy
Change: Partial Deletion of Sites Listed
on the National Priorities List. 60 FR
55,466 (Nov. 1, 1995). As described in
300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, a portion of a
site deleted from the NPL remains
eligible for Fund-financed remedial
action if future conditions warrant such
actions. Whenever there is a significant
release from a site deleted or partially
deleted from the NPL, the site shall be
restored to the NPL.
Because EPA considers this action to
be noncontroversial and routine, this
action will be effective March 30, 2009
unless EPA receives adverse comments
by February 26, 2009. Along with this
direct final Notice of Partial Deletion,
EPA is co-publishing a Notice of Intent
for Partial Deletion in the ‘‘Proposed
Rules’’ section of the Federal Register.
If adverse comments are received within
the 30-day public comment period on
this partial deletion action, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final Notice of Partial Deletion
before the effective date of the partial
deletion and the partial deletion will
not take effect. EPA will, as appropriate,
prepare a response to comments and
continue with the deletion process on
the basis of the Notice of Intent for
Partial Deletion and the comments
already received. There will be no
additional opportunity to comment.
Section II of this document explains
the criteria for deleting sites from the
NPL. Section III discusses procedures
that EPA is using for this action. Section
IV discusses former Wetland Areas B
and C of the Site and demonstrates how
the deletion criteria are met. Section V
discusses EPA’s action to partially
delete the Site parcels from the NPL
unless adverse comments are received
during the public comment period.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
The NCP establishes the criteria that
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL.
In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e),
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:08 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
sites may be deleted from the NPL
where no further response is
appropriate. In making such a
determination pursuant to 40 CFR
300.425(e), EPA will consider, in
consultation with the State, whether any
of the following criteria have been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons
have implemented all appropriate
response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed
response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and no further response
action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has
shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the
environment and, therefore, the taking
of remedial measures is not appropriate.
Pursuant to CERCLA Section 121(c)
and the NCP, EPA conducts five-year
reviews to ensure the continued
protectiveness of remedial actions
where hazardous substances, pollutants,
or contaminants remain at a site above
levels that allow for unlimited use and
unrestricted exposure. EPA conducts
such five-year reviews even if a site is
deleted from the NPL. EPA may initiate
further action to ensure continued
protectiveness at a deleted site if new
information becomes available that
indicates it is appropriate. Whenever
there is a significant release from a site
deleted from the NPL, the deleted site
may be restored to the NPL without
application of the hazard ranking
system.
III. Partial Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to the
deletion of the soil and sediment of
former Wetland Areas B and C and the
ground water at former Wetland Area C
of the Site:
(1) EPA has consulted with the
Commonwealth of Virginia prior to
developing this direct final Notice of
Partial Deletion and the Notice of Intent
for Partial Deletion co-published in the
‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of the Federal
Register.
(2) EPA has provided the
Commonwealth 30 working days for
review of this notice and the parallel
Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion
prior to their publication today, and the
Commonwealth, through the Virginia
Department of Environmental Quality
(VDEQ), has concurred on the partial
deletion of the Site from the NPL.
(3) Concurrently with the publication
of this direct final Notice of Partial
Deletion, a notice of the availability of
the parallel Notice of Intent for Partial
Deletion is being published in a major
local newspaper, the Richmond Times
Dispatch. The newspaper notice
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
announces the 30-day public comment
period concerning the Notice of Intent
for Partial Deletion of the Site from the
NPL.
(4) The EPA has placed copies of
documents supporting the partial
deletion in the deletion docket and
made these items available for public
inspection and copying at the Site
information repositories identified
above.
(5) If adverse comments are received
within the 30-day public comment
period on this partial deletion action,
EPA will publish a timely notice of
withdrawal of this direct final Notice of
Partial Deletion before its effective date
and will prepare a response to
comments and continue with the
deletion process on the basis of the
Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion and
the comments already received.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the
NPL does not itself create, alter, or
revoke any individual’s rights or
obligations. Deletion of a portion of a
site from the NPL does not in any way
alter EPA’s right to take enforcement
actions, as appropriate. The NPL is
designed primarily for informational
purposes and to assist EPA
management. Section 300.425(e)(3) of
the NCP states that the deletion of a
portion of a site from the NPL does not
preclude eligibility for further response
actions, should future conditions
warrant such actions.
IV. Basis for Partial Site Deletion
The following information provides
EPA’s rationale for deleting the soil and
sediment at former Wetland Areas B and
C and the ground water at former
Wetland Area C of the Rentokil, Inc.
Superfund Site from the NPL:
Site Background and History
The Rentokil, Inc. Superfund Site
(Site) is a former wood treating facility
that operated under the name of
Virginia Wood Preservers and that
ceased operating in January 1990. The
Site is located at 3000 Peyton Street at
the intersection of Peyton Street and
Ackley Avenue in Henrico County, near
Richmond, Virginia. The Site includes
the former wood treatment process area,
the wood drying areas, Wetland Area A,
and the two former wetland areas
(Wetland Areas B and C). None of the
wetland areas were used in the wood
treating process; these areas became
contaminated by runoff from the Site.
Wetland Area A, the area immediately
north of the former process area, is
located within the flood plain of an
unnamed tributary to North Run.
Wetland Area A was remediated and revegetated to remain a wetland. Former
E:\FR\FM\27JAR1.SGM
27JAR1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Wetland Area B, the area at the
southeast corner of the Site, and former
Wetland Area C, the area immediately
south of the Site which is across Peyton
Street, were connected by two culverts
under Peyton Avenue. Surface runoff
discharged from the Site through a ditch
to former Wetland B, where it was
retained and discharged to former
Wetland C when flow was high. A ditch
along the north side of Peyton Avenue
also collected runoff from the Site. This
runoff flowed through the west culvert
to former Wetland Area C. A ditch
parallel to the south side of Peyton
Avenue carried runoff from former
Wetland Area C to the east and
ultimately to a 24-inch culvert under
Ackley Avenue. Because the invert of
the 24-inch culvert was about two feet
above the flow line of the south ditch
and the normal elevation of former
Wetland Area C, Site-related runoff
waters were retained within former
Wetland Area C.
Wood treating operations at the Site
were initiated in 1957 and continued
under several different owners/
operators. In 1974, Rentokil, Inc.
purchased the stock of TaCo, one of the
previous owners. Both TaCo and the
Virginia Wood Preserving Corporation
(the owner prior to 1974) were
subsequently merged into Rentokil.
Rentokil later changed its name to
Rentokil SupaTimber, Inc. and, in
September 1989, changed its name to
Virginia Properties, Inc. (VPI), a wholly
owned subsidiary of Rentokil, Inc.
The land immediately surrounding
the Site is mostly open space/
woodlands. Nearby development is
comprised of light industrial,
commercial, and low density
residential. A private developer has
purchased former Wetland Area B in
preparation of placing new commercial/
office buildings in this area. The
surrounding area is served by public
water supply.
EPA proposed that the Site be listed
on the NPL in January 1987. The Site
was placed on the NPL in March 1989.
Pursuant to CERCLA, Rentokil, Inc. and
EPA signed an Administrative Order by
Consent in December 1987 to conduct a
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility
Study (RI/FS) to identify the types,
quantities, and locations of
contaminants and to develop ways of
addressing Site contamination. The two
phases of field work for the RI were
conducted from May to August 1989
and from June to July 1991. In March
1992, VPI and EPA entered into an
Administrative Order by Consent for
Removal Action (Order). The purpose of
the Order was to design and construct
sediment control structures to prevent
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:08 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
additional migration of contaminated
sediment from the Site into North Run
Creek. These structures were completed
by June 22, 1992.
EPA issued a Record of Decision
(ROD) for the Site on June 22, 1993. The
ROD addressed all aspects of Site
cleanup: Existing structures, ‘‘hot
spots’’, ground water, surface water,
soil, sediment, mitigation for the loss of
wetlands, and institutional controls, as
described more completely below. A
Consent Decree, whereby VPI agreed to
implement the requirements of the ROD,
was signed by VPI in 1994.
Remedial Investigation and Feasibility
Study (RI/FS)
Analytical results of the sampling
performed for the RI indicate that the
surface soil, subsurface soil, ground
water, and sediments posed
unacceptable risks to human health and
the environment, mainly through
exposure to the following Site-related
contaminants: Arsenic, chromium,
copper, pentachlorophenol, and
polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
(from using creosote).
Record of Decision Findings
The major components of the remedy
selected in the ROD include:
Demolition, decontamination, and offsite disposal of the existing structures;
excavation, treatment (if necessary) and
off-site disposal of the on-site pond
sediments; excavation and on-site
disposal of the contaminated soil and
sediment in Wetland Areas A, B, and C;
construction of an impermeable cap;
excavation, low temperature thermal
desorption treatment, and on-site
disposal of the ‘‘hot spots’’, the soil in
the CCA Disposal Area, the Fill Area,
and the source material within 25 feet
of the concrete drip pad, the on-site
pond, and the former blowdown sump;
construction of a slurry wall;
construction of a dewatering system
within the cap/slurry wall containment
system; institutional controls; mitigation
for the loss or damage to the wetland
areas; and, long-term ground water
monitoring.
Although Remedial Action Objectives
were not specifically identified in the
ROD, the following objectives can be
inferred from the major components of
the remedy: Reduce risks to human
health by preventing direct contact
with, and ingestion of, contaminants in
the site soil, wetland sediments, and
pond sediments, and by preventing
potential ingestion of contaminated
ground water; reduce risks to the
environment by preventing direct
contact with, and ingestion of,
contaminants in the wetland sediments;
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4689
minimize the migration of contaminants
from site soil and wetland sediments
that could result in surface water
concentrations in excess of Ambient
Water Quality Criteria; eliminate or
minimize the threat posed to human
health and the environment by
preventing exposure to the
contaminants in the ground water; and
contain contaminated ground water to
protect human health and the
environment.
EPA amended the ROD on August 27,
1996, with the concurrence of VDEQ to
delete the requirement for treatment of
the ‘‘hot spots’’ at the Site because
ground water modeling indicated that
treating the ‘‘hot spots’’ had no effect on
the levels of contaminants in the ground
water.
Response Actions
Remedial construction of former
Wetland Area B started in June 1998
with the clearing and grubbing of the
existing vegetation. All of the clearing
and grubbing materials were chipped in
a tub grinder and were disposed of at
the Old Dominion (BFI) landfill in
Richmond, Virginia. Excavation of the
top 24 inches of contaminated soil
occurred in July 1998, immediately
followed by backfilling the excavated
area with clean soil. The remedial
construction was completed in August
1998 when the area was seeded with an
approved seed mix. A total of 3,339
cubic yards of contaminated soil was
excavated and placed under the cap
constructed in the area of the former rail
spur.
Remedial construction of former
Wetland Area C also started in June
1998 with the clearing and grubbing of
the existing vegetation. All of the
clearing and grubbing materials were
chipped in a tub grinder and were
disposed of at the Old Dominion (BFI)
landfill in Richmond, Virginia.
Excavation of the top 24 inches of
contaminated soil occurred in August
1998, immediately followed by
backfilling the excavated area with
clean soil. The remedial construction
was completed in October 1998 when
the area was seeded with an approved
seed mix. A total of 5,380 cubic yards
of contaminated soil was excavated and
placed under the cap constructed in the
area of the former rail spur.
In the ROD, EPA, with the advice of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
selected wetlands mitigation because of
the damage caused to former Wetland
Areas B and C. The mitigation consisted
of purchasing approximately 6.81 acres
of prior converted cropland and
reconstructing the land to simulate
natural wetland conditions. Mitigation
E:\FR\FM\27JAR1.SGM
27JAR1
4690
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
occurred in the Virginia Wood
Preserving portion of the Chickahominy
LLC mitigation area located in Charles
City County, Virginia, approximately 25
miles east of Richmond, in the
Chickahominy River floodplain.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Cleanup Standards
Arsenic was the primary contaminant
of concern in the wetland areas. As
such, all soil exceeding the site-specific
cleanup level for arsenic of 33 mg/kg
was excavated to a depth of 24 inches.
Confirmatory sampling was performed
during the remedial action to confirm
that the soil cleanup level was achieved.
Operation and Maintenance
The cap at the Site is routinely
monitored to make sure the fence is in
good condition, to determine when to
mow the grass, to check if there are any
problems with erosion of the cap surface
that needs repair, and to locate any trees
which require cutting down.
Rentokil, Inc. takes ground water
samples semi-annually to monitor the
levels of contaminants. The selected
remedy includes withdrawing ground
water from within the area enclosed by
the cap/slurry wall. However, EPA, with
the concurrence of the VDEQ, has
agreed to a request by Rentokil, Inc. to
place a moratorium on the withdrawal
of ground water to determine whether
this practice has any effect on the levels
or dispersion of the contaminants in the
ground water outside of this enclosed
area.
Institutional controls in the form of a
Deed Notice and Declaration of
Restrictive Covenants for Certain
property at the Rentokil Superfund Site
was recorded in the Clerk’s Office of
Henrico County on December 1, 2005.
Included in the Restrictive Covenant are
provisions precluding residential
development and ground water use in
former Wetland Area B. Even though the
ground water at former Wetland Area B
is not contaminated, EPA required the
restriction on ground water use to
prevent the possibility of drawing
contamination in that direction. There
are no use restrictions for former
Wetland Area C.
EPA and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service continue to monitor progress at
the mitigation site in Charles City
County. Two issues were brought up as
a result of the latest site visit in
September 2007. First, Japanese
honeysuckle, should be treated with an
herbicide to allow other desirable
vegetation to grow. Secondly, the tree
tubes used during the initial planting
effort should be removed because they
are restricting the growth of the tree
trunks.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:08 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
Five-Year Review
EPA issued the first five-year review
report for the Site on September 17,
2003. In the report, EPA stated that a
protectiveness determination of the
remedy could not be made until a
determination is made as to whether the
contaminant levels at monitoring well
number 2 is due to leakage from the
cap/slurry wall containment system. No
issues were identified for the
implementation of the remedy or the
protectiveness at either former Wetland
Area B or C.
The second five-year review report
was issued on September 22, 2008. In
the second five-year review report, EPA
determined that the remedy is
protective of human health and the
environment. All threats at the Site
associated with ingestion or dermal
contact with contaminated soil and
sediments have been addressed through
capping of the Site and excavation and
consolidation of those areas of
contaminated soil and sediments
previously located beyond the extent of
the cap (including the soil and sediment
at former Wetland Areas B and C). The
ground water clean-up goals selected for
the Site are protective of human health
and the environment. In the interim,
exposure pathways that could result in
unacceptable risks are being controlled.
Even though no one currently uses the
contaminated ground water,
institutional controls have been
implemented to prevent exposure to, or
ingestion of, contaminated ground water
(an institutional control has also been
placed on the ground water at former
Wetland Area B to prevent drawing the
contaminated ground water to that area).
Long-term protectiveness of the
remedial action will be verified by
obtaining ground water samples to fully
evaluate migration of the contaminant
plume downgradient of the slurry wall.
Current data indicated that the plume
remains in the area of VPMW–02 and is
not expanding.
EPA will need to conduct the next
five-year review of the Site by
September 2013. Former Wetland Area
C will not be subject to future five-year
reviews because all response actions are
complete and conditions allow for
unlimited use and unrestricted
exposure.
Community Involvement
The most recent community
involvement activity for this Site was
placing the newspaper ad informing the
public that EPA was conducting a fiveyear review of the Site. The ad was
placed in the Richmond Times Dispatch
on August 21, 2008. In the ad, EPA
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
solicited the general sentiment from the
local community on how Site operations
affected them and whether anyone had
any comments, suggestions, or
recommendations regarding the
management or operation of the Site. No
feedback was received from the
community.
Concurrently with the publication of
this direct final Notice of Partial
Deletion, a notice of the availability of
the parallel Notice of Intent for Partial
Deletion will be published in the
Richmond Times Dispatch. The
newspaper notice will announce the 30day public comment period concerning
the Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion
of the Site from the NPL.
Determination That the Criteria for
Deletion Have Been Met
The soil and sediments in former
Wetland Areas B and C and the ground
water at former Wetland Area C are
being proposed for deletion because the
Responsible Party completed all
appropriate response actions required
by the ROD. The remedy selected in the
ROD for these two areas included
excavating the contaminated soil and
disposing the material under the cap.
All soil exceeding the site-specific
cleanup level of 33 mg/kg of arsenic was
excavated to a depth of 24 inches, with
the extent of excavation determined by
confirmatory sampling. The excavated
areas were then backfilled with clean
soil and seeded. This work was
completed during the remedial action,
as documented in the Preliminary Close
Out Report dated September 2, 1999.
Mitigation for the damage to the
wetland areas occurred in the Virginia
Wood Preserving portion of the
Chickahominy LLC mitigation area
located in Charles City County, Virginia.
EPA is deleting former Wetland Areas
B and C from the NPL as requested by
Parham Forest Partners, LLC, the
purchaser of the former Wetland Area B
parcel of the Site, and VDEQ. EPA
Region 3 submitted the direct final
Notice of Partial Deletion and the Notice
of Intent of Partial Deletion to EPA
Headquarters and to the VDEQ for their
concurrence.
V. Deletion Action
The EPA, with concurrence of the
Commonwealth of Virginia through the
Virginia Department of Environmental
Quality, has determined that all
appropriate response actions under
CERCLA, other than operation and
maintenance and five-year reviews,
have been completed. Therefore, EPA is
deleting the soil and sediments in
former Wetland Areas B and C and the
E:\FR\FM\27JAR1.SGM
27JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
ground water at former Wetland Area C
of the Rentokil, Inc. Site from the NPL.
Because EPA considers this action to
be noncontroversial and routine, EPA is
taking it without prior publication. This
action will be effective March 30, 2009,
unless EPA receives adverse comments
by February 26, 2009. If adverse
comments are received within the 30day public comment period, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final notice of partial deletion
before the effective date of the partial
deletion and it will not take effect. EPA
will prepare a response to comments
and continue with the deletion process
on the basis of the notice of intent to
partially delete and the comments
already received. There will be no
additional opportunity to comment.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
substances, Hazardous waste,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: December 16, 2008.
William T. Wisniewski,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 3.
For the reasons set out in this
document, 40 CFR part 300 is amended
as follows:
■
4691
PART 300—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 300
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR
1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923,
3 CFR 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Appendix B—[Amended]
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to part 300
is amended under ‘‘VA’’ by revising the
entry for ‘‘Rentokil, Inc.’’, (Virginia
Wood Preserving Division) to read as
follows:
■
Appendix B to Part 300—National
Priorities List
TABLE 1—GENERAL SUPERFUND SECTION
State
Site name
City/county
Virginia ...................................
Rentokil, Inc. (Virginia Wood Preserving Division) ....................................
Richmond .............................
(a) * * *
P = Sites with partial deletion(s).
implement this Act and the analog
nightlight program.
[FR Doc. E9–1704 Filed 1–26–09; 8:45 am]
DATES:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[MB Docket No. 08–255; FCC 09–2]
Implementation of Short-Term Analog
Flash and Emergency Readiness Act;
Establishment of DTV Transition
‘‘Analog Nightlight’’ Program
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: With this document, the
Commission implements the Short-term
Analog Flash and Emergency Readiness
Act, Public Law 110–459, 122 Stat. 5121
(2008). The Analog Nightlight Act
requires the Commission to develop and
implement a program by January 15,
2009, to ‘‘encourage and permit’’
continued analog TV service for a
period of 30 days after the February 17,
2009 DTV transition date, to the extent
technically feasible, for the purpose of
providing emergency and DTV
transition information to viewers who
may not obtain the necessary equipment
to receive digital broadcasts by the
transition deadline. The Act intends to
provide short-term assistance to viewers
as the nation transitions from analog to
digital television service. This
document adopts the policies to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:08 Jan 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
Effective January 27, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information on this
proceeding, contact Kim Matthews,
Kim.Matthews@fcc.gov, or Evan
Baranoff, Evan.Baranoff@fcc.gov of the
Media Bureau, Policy Division, (202)
418–2120; or John Gabrysch,
John.Gabrysch@fcc.gov, of the Media
Bureau, Engineering Division, (202)
418–7000.
This is a
summary of the Commission’s Report
and Order (Order), FCC 09–2, adopted
and released on January 15, 2009. The
full text of this document is available for
public inspection and copying during
regular business hours in the FCC
Reference Center, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street, SW., CY–A257, Washington, DC
20554. These documents will also be
available via ECFS (https://www.fcc.gov/
cgb/ecfs/). (Documents will be available
electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/
or Adobe Acrobat.) The complete text
may be purchased from the
Commission’s copy contractor, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554. To request this
document in accessible formats
(computer diskettes, large print, audio
recording, and Braille), send an e-mail
to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Note
(a)
P
Summary of the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
I. Introduction and Background
1. The Short-term Analog Flash and
Emergency Readiness Act (‘‘Analog
Nightlight Act’’ or ‘‘Act’’), Pub. L. 110–
459, 122 Stat. 5121 (2008), requires the
Commission to develop and implement
a program by January 15, 2009, to
‘‘encourage and permit’’ continued
analog TV service for a period of 30
days after the February 17, 2009 DTV
transition date, to the extent technically
feasible, for the purpose of providing
‘‘public safety information’’ and ‘‘DTV
transition information’’ to viewers who
may not obtain the necessary equipment
to receive digital broadcasts by the
transition deadline. This Report and
Order (‘‘Order’’) adopts the
requirements to implement the Act.
2. Congress has mandated that after
February 17, 2009, full-power television
broadcast stations must transmit only
digital signals, and may no longer
transmit analog signals. (See Digital
Television and Public Safety Act of
2005 (‘‘DTV Act’’), which is Title III of
the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005,
Public Law 109–171, 120 Stat. 4 (2006)
(codified at 47 U.S.C. 309(j)(14) and
337(e)).) The Analog Nightlight Act is
designed to ensure that those consumers
who are not able to receive digital
signals after the DTV transition on
February 17, 2009 will not be left
without access to emergency
information. The Act is also intended to
help consumers understand the steps
they need to take in order to restore
their television service. (The analog
E:\FR\FM\27JAR1.SGM
27JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 27, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4687-4691]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1704]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 27, 2009 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 4687]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA-HQ-SFUND-1989-0008; FRL-8761-2]
National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Direct final Notice of Partial Deletion of the Rentokil, Inc.
(Virginia Wood Preserving Division) Superfund Site from the National
Priorities List.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 3 is
publishing a direct final Notice of Partial Deletion of former Wetland
Areas B and C of the Rentokil, Inc. (Virginia Wood Preserving Division)
Superfund Site (Site), located in Henrico County, near the city of
Richmond, Virginia, from the National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL,
promulgated pursuant to section 105 of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended,
is Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300, which is the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). This direct
final partial deletion is being published by EPA with the concurrence
of the Commonwealth of Virginia, through the Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality (VDEQ) because EPA has determined that all
appropriate response actions at these identified parcels under CERCLA,
other than operation and maintenance and five-year reviews, have been
completed. However, this partial deletion does not preclude future
actions under Superfund.
This partial deletion pertains to the soil and sediment of former
Wetland Areas B and C and the ground water at former Wetland Area C.
The remaining areas and media of the Site will remain on the NPL and
are not being considered for deletion as part of this action.
DATES: This direct final partial deletion is effective March 30, 2009
unless EPA receives adverse comments by February 26, 2009. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final partial deletion in the Federal Register informing the
public that the partial deletion will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-1989-0008, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow on-line instructions
for submitting comments.
E-mail: Larry C. Johnson, Community Involvement
Coordinator at Johnson.larryc@epa.gov or Andy Palestini, Remedial
Project Manager at Palestini.andy@epa.gov.
Fax: 1-215-814-3002.
Mail: Larry C. Johnson, Community Involvement Coordinator,
U.S. EPA Region 3, Mailcode 3HS52, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Hand delivery: Larry C. Johnson, Community Involvement
Coordinator, U.S. EPA Region 3, Mailcode 3HS52, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103. Such deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be
made for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-SFUND-
1989-0008. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at:
U.S. EPA Region 3 Library, U.S. EPA Region 3, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029, (215) 814-5000, Monday through
Friday 8 a.m. to 12 p.m.; Henrico County Municipal Reference and Law
Library, Parham Road at Hungary Spring Road, Richmond, Virginia 23273.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andy Palestini, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 3, 3HS23, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103, 215-814-3233.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Partial Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Partial Site Deletion
V. Deletion Action
I. Introduction
EPA Region 3 is publishing this direct final Notice of Partial
Deletion for the Rentokil, Inc. (Virginia Wood Preserving Division)
Superfund Site (Site), from the National Priorities List (NPL). This
partial deletion pertains to the soil and sediment of former Wetland
Areas B and C and the ground water at former Wetland Area C. The NPL
constitutes Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300, which
[[Page 4688]]
is the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP), that EPA promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
(CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 9605. EPA identifies sites that
appear to present a significant risk to public health, welfare, or the
environment and maintains the NPL as the list of these sites. Sites on
the NPL may be the subject of remedial actions financed by the
Hazardous Substance Superfund (Fund). This partial deletion of the
Rentokil, Inc. (Virginia Wood Preserving Division) Superfund Site is
proposed in accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e) and is consistent with
the Notice of Policy Change: Partial Deletion of Sites Listed on the
National Priorities List. 60 FR 55,466 (Nov. 1, 1995). As described in
300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, a portion of a site deleted from the NPL
remains eligible for Fund-financed remedial action if future conditions
warrant such actions. Whenever there is a significant release from a
site deleted or partially deleted from the NPL, the site shall be
restored to the NPL.
Because EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and
routine, this action will be effective March 30, 2009 unless EPA
receives adverse comments by February 26, 2009. Along with this direct
final Notice of Partial Deletion, EPA is co-publishing a Notice of
Intent for Partial Deletion in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of the
Federal Register. If adverse comments are received within the 30-day
public comment period on this partial deletion action, EPA will publish
a timely withdrawal of this direct final Notice of Partial Deletion
before the effective date of the partial deletion and the partial
deletion will not take effect. EPA will, as appropriate, prepare a
response to comments and continue with the deletion process on the
basis of the Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion and the comments
already received. There will be no additional opportunity to comment.
Section II of this document explains the criteria for deleting
sites from the NPL. Section III discusses procedures that EPA is using
for this action. Section IV discusses former Wetland Areas B and C of
the Site and demonstrates how the deletion criteria are met. Section V
discusses EPA's action to partially delete the Site parcels from the
NPL unless adverse comments are received during the public comment
period.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
The NCP establishes the criteria that EPA uses to delete sites from
the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), sites may be deleted
from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. In making such a
determination pursuant to 40 CFR 300.425(e), EPA will consider, in
consultation with the State, whether any of the following criteria have
been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons have implemented all
appropriate response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and no further response action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the environment and, therefore,
the taking of remedial measures is not appropriate.
Pursuant to CERCLA Section 121(c) and the NCP, EPA conducts five-
year reviews to ensure the continued protectiveness of remedial actions
where hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remain at a
site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted
exposure. EPA conducts such five-year reviews even if a site is deleted
from the NPL. EPA may initiate further action to ensure continued
protectiveness at a deleted site if new information becomes available
that indicates it is appropriate. Whenever there is a significant
release from a site deleted from the NPL, the deleted site may be
restored to the NPL without application of the hazard ranking system.
III. Partial Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to the deletion of the soil and
sediment of former Wetland Areas B and C and the ground water at former
Wetland Area C of the Site:
(1) EPA has consulted with the Commonwealth of Virginia prior to
developing this direct final Notice of Partial Deletion and the Notice
of Intent for Partial Deletion co-published in the ``Proposed Rules''
section of the Federal Register.
(2) EPA has provided the Commonwealth 30 working days for review of
this notice and the parallel Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion
prior to their publication today, and the Commonwealth, through the
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VDEQ), has concurred on
the partial deletion of the Site from the NPL.
(3) Concurrently with the publication of this direct final Notice
of Partial Deletion, a notice of the availability of the parallel
Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion is being published in a major
local newspaper, the Richmond Times Dispatch. The newspaper notice
announces the 30-day public comment period concerning the Notice of
Intent for Partial Deletion of the Site from the NPL.
(4) The EPA has placed copies of documents supporting the partial
deletion in the deletion docket and made these items available for
public inspection and copying at the Site information repositories
identified above.
(5) If adverse comments are received within the 30-day public
comment period on this partial deletion action, EPA will publish a
timely notice of withdrawal of this direct final Notice of Partial
Deletion before its effective date and will prepare a response to
comments and continue with the deletion process on the basis of the
Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion and the comments already
received.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the NPL does not itself
create, alter, or revoke any individual's rights or obligations.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the NPL does not in any way alter
EPA's right to take enforcement actions, as appropriate. The NPL is
designed primarily for informational purposes and to assist EPA
management. Section 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP states that the deletion
of a portion of a site from the NPL does not preclude eligibility for
further response actions, should future conditions warrant such
actions.
IV. Basis for Partial Site Deletion
The following information provides EPA's rationale for deleting the
soil and sediment at former Wetland Areas B and C and the ground water
at former Wetland Area C of the Rentokil, Inc. Superfund Site from the
NPL:
Site Background and History
The Rentokil, Inc. Superfund Site (Site) is a former wood treating
facility that operated under the name of Virginia Wood Preservers and
that ceased operating in January 1990. The Site is located at 3000
Peyton Street at the intersection of Peyton Street and Ackley Avenue in
Henrico County, near Richmond, Virginia. The Site includes the former
wood treatment process area, the wood drying areas, Wetland Area A, and
the two former wetland areas (Wetland Areas B and C). None of the
wetland areas were used in the wood treating process; these areas
became contaminated by runoff from the Site. Wetland Area A, the area
immediately north of the former process area, is located within the
flood plain of an unnamed tributary to North Run. Wetland Area A was
remediated and re-vegetated to remain a wetland. Former
[[Page 4689]]
Wetland Area B, the area at the southeast corner of the Site, and
former Wetland Area C, the area immediately south of the Site which is
across Peyton Street, were connected by two culverts under Peyton
Avenue. Surface runoff discharged from the Site through a ditch to
former Wetland B, where it was retained and discharged to former
Wetland C when flow was high. A ditch along the north side of Peyton
Avenue also collected runoff from the Site. This runoff flowed through
the west culvert to former Wetland Area C. A ditch parallel to the
south side of Peyton Avenue carried runoff from former Wetland Area C
to the east and ultimately to a 24-inch culvert under Ackley Avenue.
Because the invert of the 24-inch culvert was about two feet above the
flow line of the south ditch and the normal elevation of former Wetland
Area C, Site-related runoff waters were retained within former Wetland
Area C.
Wood treating operations at the Site were initiated in 1957 and
continued under several different owners/operators. In 1974, Rentokil,
Inc. purchased the stock of TaCo, one of the previous owners. Both TaCo
and the Virginia Wood Preserving Corporation (the owner prior to 1974)
were subsequently merged into Rentokil. Rentokil later changed its name
to Rentokil SupaTimber, Inc. and, in September 1989, changed its name
to Virginia Properties, Inc. (VPI), a wholly owned subsidiary of
Rentokil, Inc.
The land immediately surrounding the Site is mostly open space/
woodlands. Nearby development is comprised of light industrial,
commercial, and low density residential. A private developer has
purchased former Wetland Area B in preparation of placing new
commercial/office buildings in this area. The surrounding area is
served by public water supply.
EPA proposed that the Site be listed on the NPL in January 1987.
The Site was placed on the NPL in March 1989. Pursuant to CERCLA,
Rentokil, Inc. and EPA signed an Administrative Order by Consent in
December 1987 to conduct a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
(RI/FS) to identify the types, quantities, and locations of
contaminants and to develop ways of addressing Site contamination. The
two phases of field work for the RI were conducted from May to August
1989 and from June to July 1991. In March 1992, VPI and EPA entered
into an Administrative Order by Consent for Removal Action (Order). The
purpose of the Order was to design and construct sediment control
structures to prevent additional migration of contaminated sediment
from the Site into North Run Creek. These structures were completed by
June 22, 1992.
EPA issued a Record of Decision (ROD) for the Site on June 22,
1993. The ROD addressed all aspects of Site cleanup: Existing
structures, ``hot spots'', ground water, surface water, soil, sediment,
mitigation for the loss of wetlands, and institutional controls, as
described more completely below. A Consent Decree, whereby VPI agreed
to implement the requirements of the ROD, was signed by VPI in 1994.
Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS)
Analytical results of the sampling performed for the RI indicate
that the surface soil, subsurface soil, ground water, and sediments
posed unacceptable risks to human health and the environment, mainly
through exposure to the following Site-related contaminants: Arsenic,
chromium, copper, pentachlorophenol, and polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons (from using creosote).
Record of Decision Findings
The major components of the remedy selected in the ROD include:
Demolition, decontamination, and off-site disposal of the existing
structures; excavation, treatment (if necessary) and off-site disposal
of the on-site pond sediments; excavation and on-site disposal of the
contaminated soil and sediment in Wetland Areas A, B, and C;
construction of an impermeable cap; excavation, low temperature thermal
desorption treatment, and on-site disposal of the ``hot spots'', the
soil in the CCA Disposal Area, the Fill Area, and the source material
within 25 feet of the concrete drip pad, the on-site pond, and the
former blowdown sump; construction of a slurry wall; construction of a
dewatering system within the cap/slurry wall containment system;
institutional controls; mitigation for the loss or damage to the
wetland areas; and, long-term ground water monitoring.
Although Remedial Action Objectives were not specifically
identified in the ROD, the following objectives can be inferred from
the major components of the remedy: Reduce risks to human health by
preventing direct contact with, and ingestion of, contaminants in the
site soil, wetland sediments, and pond sediments, and by preventing
potential ingestion of contaminated ground water; reduce risks to the
environment by preventing direct contact with, and ingestion of,
contaminants in the wetland sediments; minimize the migration of
contaminants from site soil and wetland sediments that could result in
surface water concentrations in excess of Ambient Water Quality
Criteria; eliminate or minimize the threat posed to human health and
the environment by preventing exposure to the contaminants in the
ground water; and contain contaminated ground water to protect human
health and the environment.
EPA amended the ROD on August 27, 1996, with the concurrence of
VDEQ to delete the requirement for treatment of the ``hot spots'' at
the Site because ground water modeling indicated that treating the
``hot spots'' had no effect on the levels of contaminants in the ground
water.
Response Actions
Remedial construction of former Wetland Area B started in June 1998
with the clearing and grubbing of the existing vegetation. All of the
clearing and grubbing materials were chipped in a tub grinder and were
disposed of at the Old Dominion (BFI) landfill in Richmond, Virginia.
Excavation of the top 24 inches of contaminated soil occurred in July
1998, immediately followed by backfilling the excavated area with clean
soil. The remedial construction was completed in August 1998 when the
area was seeded with an approved seed mix. A total of 3,339 cubic yards
of contaminated soil was excavated and placed under the cap constructed
in the area of the former rail spur.
Remedial construction of former Wetland Area C also started in June
1998 with the clearing and grubbing of the existing vegetation. All of
the clearing and grubbing materials were chipped in a tub grinder and
were disposed of at the Old Dominion (BFI) landfill in Richmond,
Virginia. Excavation of the top 24 inches of contaminated soil occurred
in August 1998, immediately followed by backfilling the excavated area
with clean soil. The remedial construction was completed in October
1998 when the area was seeded with an approved seed mix. A total of
5,380 cubic yards of contaminated soil was excavated and placed under
the cap constructed in the area of the former rail spur.
In the ROD, EPA, with the advice of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, selected wetlands mitigation because of the damage caused to
former Wetland Areas B and C. The mitigation consisted of purchasing
approximately 6.81 acres of prior converted cropland and reconstructing
the land to simulate natural wetland conditions. Mitigation
[[Page 4690]]
occurred in the Virginia Wood Preserving portion of the Chickahominy
LLC mitigation area located in Charles City County, Virginia,
approximately 25 miles east of Richmond, in the Chickahominy River
floodplain.
Cleanup Standards
Arsenic was the primary contaminant of concern in the wetland
areas. As such, all soil exceeding the site-specific cleanup level for
arsenic of 33 mg/kg was excavated to a depth of 24 inches. Confirmatory
sampling was performed during the remedial action to confirm that the
soil cleanup level was achieved.
Operation and Maintenance
The cap at the Site is routinely monitored to make sure the fence
is in good condition, to determine when to mow the grass, to check if
there are any problems with erosion of the cap surface that needs
repair, and to locate any trees which require cutting down.
Rentokil, Inc. takes ground water samples semi-annually to monitor
the levels of contaminants. The selected remedy includes withdrawing
ground water from within the area enclosed by the cap/slurry wall.
However, EPA, with the concurrence of the VDEQ, has agreed to a request
by Rentokil, Inc. to place a moratorium on the withdrawal of ground
water to determine whether this practice has any effect on the levels
or dispersion of the contaminants in the ground water outside of this
enclosed area.
Institutional controls in the form of a Deed Notice and Declaration
of Restrictive Covenants for Certain property at the Rentokil Superfund
Site was recorded in the Clerk's Office of Henrico County on December
1, 2005. Included in the Restrictive Covenant are provisions precluding
residential development and ground water use in former Wetland Area B.
Even though the ground water at former Wetland Area B is not
contaminated, EPA required the restriction on ground water use to
prevent the possibility of drawing contamination in that direction.
There are no use restrictions for former Wetland Area C.
EPA and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service continue to monitor
progress at the mitigation site in Charles City County. Two issues were
brought up as a result of the latest site visit in September 2007.
First, Japanese honeysuckle, should be treated with an herbicide to
allow other desirable vegetation to grow. Secondly, the tree tubes used
during the initial planting effort should be removed because they are
restricting the growth of the tree trunks.
Five-Year Review
EPA issued the first five-year review report for the Site on
September 17, 2003. In the report, EPA stated that a protectiveness
determination of the remedy could not be made until a determination is
made as to whether the contaminant levels at monitoring well number 2
is due to leakage from the cap/slurry wall containment system. No
issues were identified for the implementation of the remedy or the
protectiveness at either former Wetland Area B or C.
The second five-year review report was issued on September 22,
2008. In the second five-year review report, EPA determined that the
remedy is protective of human health and the environment. All threats
at the Site associated with ingestion or dermal contact with
contaminated soil and sediments have been addressed through capping of
the Site and excavation and consolidation of those areas of
contaminated soil and sediments previously located beyond the extent of
the cap (including the soil and sediment at former Wetland Areas B and
C). The ground water clean-up goals selected for the Site are
protective of human health and the environment. In the interim,
exposure pathways that could result in unacceptable risks are being
controlled. Even though no one currently uses the contaminated ground
water, institutional controls have been implemented to prevent exposure
to, or ingestion of, contaminated ground water (an institutional
control has also been placed on the ground water at former Wetland Area
B to prevent drawing the contaminated ground water to that area). Long-
term protectiveness of the remedial action will be verified by
obtaining ground water samples to fully evaluate migration of the
contaminant plume downgradient of the slurry wall. Current data
indicated that the plume remains in the area of VPMW-02 and is not
expanding.
EPA will need to conduct the next five-year review of the Site by
September 2013. Former Wetland Area C will not be subject to future
five-year reviews because all response actions are complete and
conditions allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure.
Community Involvement
The most recent community involvement activity for this Site was
placing the newspaper ad informing the public that EPA was conducting a
five-year review of the Site. The ad was placed in the Richmond Times
Dispatch on August 21, 2008. In the ad, EPA solicited the general
sentiment from the local community on how Site operations affected them
and whether anyone had any comments, suggestions, or recommendations
regarding the management or operation of the Site. No feedback was
received from the community.
Concurrently with the publication of this direct final Notice of
Partial Deletion, a notice of the availability of the parallel Notice
of Intent for Partial Deletion will be published in the Richmond Times
Dispatch. The newspaper notice will announce the 30-day public comment
period concerning the Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion of the Site
from the NPL.
Determination That the Criteria for Deletion Have Been Met
The soil and sediments in former Wetland Areas B and C and the
ground water at former Wetland Area C are being proposed for deletion
because the Responsible Party completed all appropriate response
actions required by the ROD. The remedy selected in the ROD for these
two areas included excavating the contaminated soil and disposing the
material under the cap. All soil exceeding the site-specific cleanup
level of 33 mg/kg of arsenic was excavated to a depth of 24 inches,
with the extent of excavation determined by confirmatory sampling. The
excavated areas were then backfilled with clean soil and seeded. This
work was completed during the remedial action, as documented in the
Preliminary Close Out Report dated September 2, 1999. Mitigation for
the damage to the wetland areas occurred in the Virginia Wood
Preserving portion of the Chickahominy LLC mitigation area located in
Charles City County, Virginia.
EPA is deleting former Wetland Areas B and C from the NPL as
requested by Parham Forest Partners, LLC, the purchaser of the former
Wetland Area B parcel of the Site, and VDEQ. EPA Region 3 submitted the
direct final Notice of Partial Deletion and the Notice of Intent of
Partial Deletion to EPA Headquarters and to the VDEQ for their
concurrence.
V. Deletion Action
The EPA, with concurrence of the Commonwealth of Virginia through
the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, has determined that
all appropriate response actions under CERCLA, other than operation and
maintenance and five-year reviews, have been completed. Therefore, EPA
is deleting the soil and sediments in former Wetland Areas B and C and
the
[[Page 4691]]
ground water at former Wetland Area C of the Rentokil, Inc. Site from
the NPL.
Because EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and
routine, EPA is taking it without prior publication. This action will
be effective March 30, 2009, unless EPA receives adverse comments by
February 26, 2009. If adverse comments are received within the 30-day
public comment period, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final notice of partial deletion before the effective date of
the partial deletion and it will not take effect. EPA will prepare a
response to comments and continue with the deletion process on the
basis of the notice of intent to partially delete and the comments
already received. There will be no additional opportunity to comment.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Hazardous waste, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: December 16, 2008.
William T. Wisniewski,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 3.
0
For the reasons set out in this document, 40 CFR part 300 is amended as
follows:
PART 300--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR
2923, 3 CFR 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Appendix B--[Amended]
0
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to part 300 is amended under ``VA'' by
revising the entry for ``Rentokil, Inc.'', (Virginia Wood Preserving
Division) to read as follows:
Appendix B to Part 300--National Priorities List
Table 1--General Superfund Section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Site name City/county Note (a)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virginia............................. Rentokil, Inc. (Virginia Wood Richmond................ P
Preserving Division).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) * * *
P = Sites with partial deletion(s).
[FR Doc. E9-1704 Filed 1-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P