Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments, 4196 [E9-1395]
Download as PDF
4196
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 14 / Friday, January 23, 2009 / Notices
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
ER–FRL–8589–8]
Environmental Impact Statements and
Regulations; Availability of EPA
Comments
Availability of EPA comments
prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section
309 of the Clean Air Act and Section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act as amended. Requests for
copies of EPA comments can be directed
to the Office of Federal Activities at
202–564–7146.
An explanation of the ratings assigned
to draft environmental impact
statements (EISs) was published in FR
dated April 6, 2008 (73 FR 19833).
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20080415, ERP No. D–FHW–
L40235–ID, I–90 Post Falls Access
Improvements Project, Transportation
Improve from Spokane Street
Interchange through the State
Highway 41 (SH–41) Interchange,
Kootenai County, ID
Summary: EPA has no objections to
the proposed project. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20080389, ERP No. DA–AFS–
L65369–00, Southwest Idaho
Ecogroup Land and Resource
Management Plan, Provide Additional
Information to Reanalyzes the Effects
of Current and Proposed Management
on Rock Mountain Bighorn Sheep
Viability in the Payette National
Forest 2003 FEIS, Boise National
Forest, Payette National Forest and
Sawtooth National Forest, Forest Plan
Revision, Implementation, Several
Counties, ID; Malhaur County, OR
and Box Elder County, UT.
Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns about disease
transmission between bighorn sheep
and domestic sheep, the uncertainty in
modeling, and monitoring details.
Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20080442, ERP No. DS–AFS–
J65469–CO, White River National
Forest Travel Management Plan,
Updated Information for the Preferred
Alternative, To Accommodate and
Balance Transportation Needs,
Implementation, Eagle, Garfield,
Gunnison, Mesa, Moffat, Pitkin, Rio
Blanco, Routt and Summit Counties,
CO.
Summary: EPA’s previous concerns
were resolved, therefore EPA has no
objections to the proposed action.
Rating LO.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:32 Jan 22, 2009
Jkt 217001
Final EISs
EIS No. 20080487, ERP No. F–AFS–
F65035–WA, Cayuga Project,
Proposed Vegetation and
Transportation Management
Activities northeast of Clam Lake,
Preferred Alternative Selected
Alternative 7, Great Divide Ranger
District, Chequamegon-Nicolet
National Forest, Ashland County, WI.
Summary: EPA’s concerns about
marten habitat have been addressed.
Therefore, EPA has no objections to the
project.
EIS No. 20080488, ERP No. F–FHW–
F40442–MI, Detroit River
International Crossing Study, Propose
Border Crossing System between the
International Border Cities of Detroit,
Michigan and Windsor, Ontario,
Wayne County, MI.
Summary: EPA has no objections to
the proposed project.
EIS No. 20080495, ERP No. F–USN–
K10011–CA, Southern California
(SOCAL) Range Complex, To
Organize, Train, Equip, and Maintain
Combat-Ready Naval Forces, San
Diego, Orange and Los Angeles
Counties, CA.
Summary: EPA continues to have
environmental concerns about impacts
to marine resources and ocean water
quality from munitions.
EIS No. 20080501, ERP No. F–AFS–
J65500–00, Wild and Scenic River
Suitability Study for National Forest
System Lands on the Ashley, Dixie,
Fishlake, Manti-La Sal, Uinta and
Wasatch-Cache National Forests in
UT and Portion of National Forests
extend into Colorado and Wyoming,
several counties, UT, Montrose
County, CO and Uinta County, WY.
Summary: No formal comment letter
was sent to the preparing agency.
Dated: January 16, 2009.
Ken Mittelholtz,
Environmental Protection Specialist, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E9–1395 Filed 1–22–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8765–5]
Science Advisory Board Staff Office;
Clean Air Scientific Advisory
Committee (CASAC); Notification of
Public Teleconferences; of the
Ambient Air Monitoring & Methods
(AAMM) Subcommittee
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA or Agency) Science
Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office
announces two public teleconferences
of the Clean Air Scientific Advisory
Committee (CASAC) Ambient Air
Monitoring & Methods Subcommittee
(AAMMS or Subcommittee) to conduct
consultations concerning ambient air
monitoring issues related to the
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) for ozone and particulate
matter.
DATES: The meeting dates are Tuesday,
February 10, 2009, from 11 a.m. to 2
p.m. (Eastern Time) and Wednesday,
February 11, 2009, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
(Eastern Time).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any
member of the public who wishes to
obtain further information concerning
this public teleconference may contact:
Ms. Kyndall Barry, Designated Federal
Officer (DFO), EPA Science Advisory
Board (1400F), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460;
via telephone/voice mail: (202) 343–
9868; fax: (202) 233–0643; or e-mail at
barry.kyndall@epa.gov. General
information concerning the CASAC can
be found on the EPA Web site at
https://www.epa.gov/casac/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: The Clean Air Scientific
Advisory Committee (CASAC) was
established under section 109(d)(2) of
the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) (42
U.S.C. 7409) as an independent
scientific advisory committee. CASAC
provides advice, information and
recommendations on the scientific and
technical aspects of air quality criteria
and NAAQS under sections 108 and 109
of the Act. The CASAC is a Federal
advisory committee chartered under the
Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA), as amended, 5 U.S.C., App. The
CASAC Ambient Air Monitoring &
Methods Subcommittee (AAMMS) was
established in 2004 as a standing
subcommittee of CASAC to provide
advice and recommendations to the EPA
Administrator on topics specific to
ambient air monitoring, methods and
networks. The Subcommittee will
comply with the provisions of FACA
and all appropriate SAB Staff Office
procedural policies. Section 109(d)(1) of
the CAA requires that the Agency
periodically review and revise, as
appropriate, the air quality criteria and
the NAAQS for the six ‘‘criteria’’ air
pollutants, including both ozone (O3)
and particulate matter (PM).
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 14 (Friday, January 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1395]
[[Page 4196]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ER-FRL-8589-8]
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments
Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and
Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended.
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of
Federal Activities at 202-564-7146.
An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 6, 2008 (73 FR
19833).
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20080415, ERP No. D-FHW-L40235-ID, I-90 Post Falls Access
Improvements Project, Transportation Improve from Spokane Street
Interchange through the State Highway 41 (SH-41) Interchange, Kootenai
County, ID
Summary: EPA has no objections to the proposed project. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20080389, ERP No. DA-AFS-L65369-00, Southwest Idaho Ecogroup
Land and Resource Management Plan, Provide Additional Information to
Reanalyzes the Effects of Current and Proposed Management on Rock
Mountain Bighorn Sheep Viability in the Payette National Forest 2003
FEIS, Boise National Forest, Payette National Forest and Sawtooth
National Forest, Forest Plan Revision, Implementation, Several
Counties, ID; Malhaur County, OR and Box Elder County, UT.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about disease
transmission between bighorn sheep and domestic sheep, the uncertainty
in modeling, and monitoring details. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20080442, ERP No. DS-AFS-J65469-CO, White River National Forest
Travel Management Plan, Updated Information for the Preferred
Alternative, To Accommodate and Balance Transportation Needs,
Implementation, Eagle, Garfield, Gunnison, Mesa, Moffat, Pitkin, Rio
Blanco, Routt and Summit Counties, CO.
Summary: EPA's previous concerns were resolved, therefore EPA has
no objections to the proposed action. Rating LO.
Final EISs
EIS No. 20080487, ERP No. F-AFS-F65035-WA, Cayuga Project, Proposed
Vegetation and Transportation Management Activities northeast of Clam
Lake, Preferred Alternative Selected Alternative 7, Great Divide Ranger
District, Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, Ashland County, WI.
Summary: EPA's concerns about marten habitat have been addressed.
Therefore, EPA has no objections to the project.
EIS No. 20080488, ERP No. F-FHW-F40442-MI, Detroit River International
Crossing Study, Propose Border Crossing System between the
International Border Cities of Detroit, Michigan and Windsor, Ontario,
Wayne County, MI.
Summary: EPA has no objections to the proposed project.
EIS No. 20080495, ERP No. F-USN-K10011-CA, Southern California (SOCAL)
Range Complex, To Organize, Train, Equip, and Maintain Combat-Ready
Naval Forces, San Diego, Orange and Los Angeles Counties, CA.
Summary: EPA continues to have environmental concerns about impacts
to marine resources and ocean water quality from munitions.
EIS No. 20080501, ERP No. F-AFS-J65500-00, Wild and Scenic River
Suitability Study for National Forest System Lands on the Ashley,
Dixie, Fishlake, Manti-La Sal, Uinta and Wasatch-Cache National Forests
in UT and Portion of National Forests extend into Colorado and Wyoming,
several counties, UT, Montrose County, CO and Uinta County, WY.
Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
Dated: January 16, 2009.
Ken Mittelholtz,
Environmental Protection Specialist, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E9-1395 Filed 1-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P