Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Nevada; Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program, 3975-3977 [E9-903]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 13 / Thursday, January 22, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
temporary rule will expire on
September 25, 2009.
PART 240—GENERAL RULES AND
REGULATIONS, SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
PART 260—GENERAL RULES AND
REGULATIONS, TRUST INDENTURE
ACT OF 1939
4. The authority citation for Part 240
continues to read, in part, as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77c, 77d, 77g, 77j,
77s, 77z–2, 77z–3, 77eee, 77ggg, 77nnn,
77sss, 77ttt, 78c, 78d, 78e, 78f, 78g, 78i, 78j,
78j–1, 78k, 78k–1, 78l, 78m, 78n, 78o, 78p,
78q, 78s, 78u–5, 78w, 78x, 78ll, 78mm, 80a–
20, 80a–23, 80a–29, 80a–37, 80b–3, 80b–4,
80b–11, and 7201 et seq., and 18 U.S.C. 1350,
unless otherwise noted.
■
*
*
*
*
*
5. Section 240.12a–10T is added to
read as follows:
§ 260.4d–11T Temporary exemption for
eligible credit default swaps offered and
sold in reliance on Securities Act of 1933
Rule 239T (§ 230.239T).
§ 240.12a–10T Temporary exemption of
eligible credit default swaps from Section
12(a) of the Act.
Any eligible credit default swap (as
defined in Rule 239T of this chapter, 17
CFR 230.239T), whether or not issued
under an indenture, is exempt from the
Act if offered and sold in reliance on
Rule 239T of this chapter. This
temporary rule will expire on
September 25, 2009.
■
(a) The provisions of Section 12(a) of
the Act (15 U.S.C. 78l(a)) do not apply
in respect of any eligible credit default
swap, as defined in Rule 239T of the
Securities Act of 1933 (17 CFR
230.239T) issued or cleared by a
clearing agency registered as a clearing
agency under Section 17A of the Act (15
U.S.C. 78q–1) or exempt from
registration under Section 17A of the
Act pursuant to a rule, regulation, or
order of the Commission, that will be
purchased by or sold to an eligible
contract participant (as defined in
Section 1a(12) of the Commodity
Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1a(12)) as in
effect on the date of adoption of this
section, other than a person who is an
eligible contract participant under
Section 1(a)(12)(C) of the Commodity
Exchange Act.
(b) This temporary rule will expire on
September 25, 2009.
■ 6. Section 240.12h–1 is amended by
adding paragraph (h)T to read as
follows:
§ 240.12h–1 Exemptions from registration
under section 12(g) of the Act.
rmajette on PRODPC74 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(h)T any eligible credit default swap,
as defined in Rule 239T of the Securities
Act of 1933 (17 CFR 230.239T), issued
or cleared by a clearing agency
registered as a clearing agency under
Section 17A of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78q–
1) or exempt from registration under
Section 17A of the Act pursuant to a
rule, regulation, or order of the
Commission that will be purchased by
or sold to an eligible contract
participant (as defined in Section 1a(12)
of the Commodity Exchange Act (7
U.S.C. 1a(12)) as in effect on the date of
adoption of this section, other than a
person who is an eligible contract
participant under Section 1(a)(12)(C) of
the Commodity Exchange Act. This
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:54 Jan 21, 2009
Jkt 217001
7. The authority citation for Part 260
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77eee, 77ggg, 77nnn,
77sss, 78ll(d), 80b–3, 80b–4, and 80b–11.
8. Section 260.4d–11T is added to
read as follows:
■
By the Commission.
Dated: January 14, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–1123 Filed 1–21–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2008–0705; FRL–8748–7]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Nevada; Vehicle
Inspection and Maintenance Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: Under the Clean Air Act, EPA
is approving certain revisions, and
disapproving certain other revisions, to
the Nevada State Implementation Plan
submitted by the Nevada Division of
Environmental Protection. These
revisions relate to the application of the
State’s vehicle inspection and
maintenance program to vehicles
operated on Federal installations. EPA
is also correcting certain plan revisions
related to this subject that EPA
previously approved in error. The
intended effect is to ensure that vehicles
operated on Federal installations are
subject only to those requirements of the
State’s vehicle inspection and
maintenance program that apply in the
same manner and to the same extent to
nongovernmental entities.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3975
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on February 23, 2009.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket
number EPA–R09–OAR–2008–0705 for
this action. The index to the docket is
available electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eleanor Kaplan, Air Planning Office
(AIR–2), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region IX, (415) 947–4147,
kaplan.eleanor@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On September 25, 2008 (73 FR 55466),
under the Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘Act’’),
EPA proposed to approve certain
revisions, and to disapprove certain
other revisions, to the Nevada State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the Nevada Division of Environmental
Protection (NDEP). These revisions
relate to the application of the State’s
vehicle inspection and maintenance
(I/M) program to vehicles operated on
Federal installations. EPA also proposed
to correct certain SIP revisions related to
this subject that EPA previously
approved in error.
Specifically, EPA proposed to
approve paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of
subsection (2) of Nevada Administrative
Code (NAC) section 445B.595
(‘‘Inspections of vehicles owned by
State or political subdivisions or
operated on federal installations’’).
NDEP submitted NAC 445B.595 to EPA
on May 11, 2007. We proposed to
approve these paragraphs of NAC
445B.595(2) because they extend the
same vehicle I/M testing, standards, and
certification requirements to motor
vehicles operated on Federal
installations as apply to
nongovernmental entities, consistent
with CAA section 118(a). See our
September 25, 2008 proposed rule at 73
FR 55467. By the same token, we
E:\FR\FM\22JAR1.SGM
22JAR1
3976
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 13 / Thursday, January 22, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
proposed to disapprove paragraph (d) of
NAC 445B.595(2) because it would
establish an additional vehicle I/M
requirement for motor vehicles operated
on Federal installations that do not
apply to nongovernmental entities and
thereby would exceed the limits on the
waiver of sovereign immunity
established in CAA section 118(a). See
our proposed rule at 73 FR 55468.
In our September 25, 2008 proposed
rule, we also proposed to rescind our
previous approval of paragraph (d) of
NAC 445B.595(2) and our previous
approvals of another State vehicle I/M
requirement, paragraph (d) of NAC
445B.461(3). We approved both of these
provisions in our 2004 approval of the
State’s vehicle I/M program in Las Vegas
Valley and Boulder City, and we
approved NAC 445B.461(3) again in our
2008 approval of the State’s update to
its mobile source SIP. See 69 FR 56351
(September 21, 2004) and 73 FR 38124
(July 3, 2008). We proposed these
rescissions under the error correction
authority provided to us under CAA
section 110(k)(6). As explained in our
proposed rule at 73 FR 55468, we
proposed to rescind our previous
approvals of NAC 445B.595(2)(d) and
NAC 445B.461(3)(d) because these
provisions establish certain additional
requirements under the State’s vehicle I/
M program for motor vehicles operated
on Federal installations that do not
apply to nongovernmental entities and
thus are inconsistent with the limits of
sovereign immunity established in CAA
section 118(a).
Our September 25, 2008 proposed
rule provides additional background
information and a more detailed
rationale for our actions summarized
above.
rmajette on PRODPC74 with RULES
II. Public Comments
EPA’s September 25, 2008 proposed
rule provided a 30-day public comment
period. No comments were submitted.
III. EPA Action
As authorized under section 110(k) of
the Clean Air Act, and for the reasons
provided in summary fashion herein
and in more detail in our proposed rule,
we are approving NDEP’s submittal on
May 11, 2007 of paragraphs (a), (b), and
(c) of NAC 445B.595(2) as consistent
with all applicable CAA requirements
but disapproving paragraph (d) of NAC
445B.595(2) as inconsistent with the
limits on the waiver of sovereign
immunity established in CAA section
118(a). In addition, under CAA section
110(k)(6), we are rescinding our
previous approvals of NAC
445B.461(3)(d) and 445B.595(2)(d) since
they would otherwise set forth
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:54 Jan 21, 2009
Jkt 217001
additional requirements under the
vehicle I/M program for motor vehicles
operated on Federal installations that do
not apply to nongovernmental entities
and thus would be inconsistent with
CAA section 118(a).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by March 23, 2009.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review, nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: November 21, 2008.
Laura Yoshi,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
■
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart DD—Nevada
■
2. Section 52.1470 is amended by:
E:\FR\FM\22JAR1.SGM
22JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 13 / Thursday, January 22, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
a. Adding paragraph (c)(48)(i)(A)(2);
b. Adding paragraph (c)(71)(i)(A)(3);
and
■ c. Adding paragraph (c)(71)(i)(A)(4) to
read as follows:
■
■
§ 52.1470
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(48) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(2) Previously approved on September
21, 2004, in paragraph (c)(48)(i)(A)(1) of
this section and now deleted from the
rmajette on PRODPC74 with RULES
*
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:54 Jan 21, 2009
Jkt 217001
SIP without replacement: Nevada
Administrative Code (NAC) sections:
445B.461(3)(d) and 445B.595(2)(d).
*
*
*
*
*
(71) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(3) Previously approved on July 3,
2008, in paragraph (c)(71)(i)(A)(2) of this
section and now deleted from the SIP
without replacement: Nevada
Administrative Code (NAC) section:
445B.461(3)(d).
(4) New or amended rules related to
mobile sources, including Nevada’s
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3977
vehicle inspection and maintenance
program in Las Vegas Valley/Boulder
City and Truckee Meadows: Nevada
Administrative Code, chapter 445B
(January 2007 revision by the Legislative
Counsel Bureau), paragraphs (a), (b),
and (c) of subsection (2) of section
445B.595, ‘‘Inspections of vehicles
owned by State or political subdivisions
or operated on federal installations.’’
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E9–903 Filed 1–21–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\22JAR1.SGM
22JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 13 (Thursday, January 22, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3975-3977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-903]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2008-0705; FRL-8748-7]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Nevada;
Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under the Clean Air Act, EPA is approving certain revisions,
and disapproving certain other revisions, to the Nevada State
Implementation Plan submitted by the Nevada Division of Environmental
Protection. These revisions relate to the application of the State's
vehicle inspection and maintenance program to vehicles operated on
Federal installations. EPA is also correcting certain plan revisions
related to this subject that EPA previously approved in error. The
intended effect is to ensure that vehicles operated on Federal
installations are subject only to those requirements of the State's
vehicle inspection and maintenance program that apply in the same
manner and to the same extent to nongovernmental entities.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on February 23, 2009.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2008-0705 for
this action. The index to the docket is available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI).
To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment
during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eleanor Kaplan, Air Planning Office
(AIR-2), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (415) 947-
4147, kaplan.eleanor@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we'', ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On September 25, 2008 (73 FR 55466), under the Clean Air Act (CAA
or ``Act''), EPA proposed to approve certain revisions, and to
disapprove certain other revisions, to the Nevada State Implementation
Plan (SIP) submitted by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection
(NDEP). These revisions relate to the application of the State's
vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program to vehicles operated
on Federal installations. EPA also proposed to correct certain SIP
revisions related to this subject that EPA previously approved in
error.
Specifically, EPA proposed to approve paragraphs (a), (b) and (c)
of subsection (2) of Nevada Administrative Code (NAC) section 445B.595
(``Inspections of vehicles owned by State or political subdivisions or
operated on federal installations''). NDEP submitted NAC 445B.595 to
EPA on May 11, 2007. We proposed to approve these paragraphs of NAC
445B.595(2) because they extend the same vehicle I/M testing,
standards, and certification requirements to motor vehicles operated on
Federal installations as apply to nongovernmental entities, consistent
with CAA section 118(a). See our September 25, 2008 proposed rule at 73
FR 55467. By the same token, we
[[Page 3976]]
proposed to disapprove paragraph (d) of NAC 445B.595(2) because it
would establish an additional vehicle I/M requirement for motor
vehicles operated on Federal installations that do not apply to
nongovernmental entities and thereby would exceed the limits on the
waiver of sovereign immunity established in CAA section 118(a). See our
proposed rule at 73 FR 55468.
In our September 25, 2008 proposed rule, we also proposed to
rescind our previous approval of paragraph (d) of NAC 445B.595(2) and
our previous approvals of another State vehicle I/M requirement,
paragraph (d) of NAC 445B.461(3). We approved both of these provisions
in our 2004 approval of the State's vehicle I/M program in Las Vegas
Valley and Boulder City, and we approved NAC 445B.461(3) again in our
2008 approval of the State's update to its mobile source SIP. See 69 FR
56351 (September 21, 2004) and 73 FR 38124 (July 3, 2008). We proposed
these rescissions under the error correction authority provided to us
under CAA section 110(k)(6). As explained in our proposed rule at 73 FR
55468, we proposed to rescind our previous approvals of NAC
445B.595(2)(d) and NAC 445B.461(3)(d) because these provisions
establish certain additional requirements under the State's vehicle I/M
program for motor vehicles operated on Federal installations that do
not apply to nongovernmental entities and thus are inconsistent with
the limits of sovereign immunity established in CAA section 118(a).
Our September 25, 2008 proposed rule provides additional background
information and a more detailed rationale for our actions summarized
above.
II. Public Comments
EPA's September 25, 2008 proposed rule provided a 30-day public
comment period. No comments were submitted.
III. EPA Action
As authorized under section 110(k) of the Clean Air Act, and for
the reasons provided in summary fashion herein and in more detail in
our proposed rule, we are approving NDEP's submittal on May 11, 2007 of
paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of NAC 445B.595(2) as consistent with all
applicable CAA requirements but disapproving paragraph (d) of NAC
445B.595(2) as inconsistent with the limits on the waiver of sovereign
immunity established in CAA section 118(a). In addition, under CAA
section 110(k)(6), we are rescinding our previous approvals of NAC
445B.461(3)(d) and 445B.595(2)(d) since they would otherwise set forth
additional requirements under the vehicle I/M program for motor
vehicles operated on Federal installations that do not apply to
nongovernmental entities and thus would be inconsistent with CAA
section 118(a).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
section 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 23, 2009. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review, nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: November 21, 2008.
Laura Yoshi,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
0
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart DD--Nevada
0
2. Section 52.1470 is amended by:
[[Page 3977]]
0
a. Adding paragraph (c)(48)(i)(A)(2);
0
b. Adding paragraph (c)(71)(i)(A)(3); and
0
c. Adding paragraph (c)(71)(i)(A)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1470 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(48) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(2) Previously approved on September 21, 2004, in paragraph
(c)(48)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted from the SIP without
replacement: Nevada Administrative Code (NAC) sections: 445B.461(3)(d)
and 445B.595(2)(d).
* * * * *
(71) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(3) Previously approved on July 3, 2008, in paragraph
(c)(71)(i)(A)(2) of this section and now deleted from the SIP without
replacement: Nevada Administrative Code (NAC) section: 445B.461(3)(d).
(4) New or amended rules related to mobile sources, including
Nevada's vehicle inspection and maintenance program in Las Vegas
Valley/Boulder City and Truckee Meadows: Nevada Administrative Code,
chapter 445B (January 2007 revision by the Legislative Counsel Bureau),
paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of subsection (2) of section 445B.595,
``Inspections of vehicles owned by State or political subdivisions or
operated on federal installations.''
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E9-903 Filed 1-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P