Petition for Waiver of Compliance, 4076 [E9-1218]
Download as PDF
4076
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 13 / Thursday, January 22, 2009 / Notices
Issued in Washington, DC, on January 14,
2009.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9–1204 Filed 1–21–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) received
a request for a waiver of compliance
from certain requirements of its safety
standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party
seeking relief, the regulatory provisions
involved, the nature of the relief being
requested, and the petitioner’s
arguments in favor of relief.
Union Pacific Railroad Company
rmajette on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
[Docket Number FRA–2008–0165]
The Union Pacific Railroad Company
(UP) seeks a waiver of compliance from
certain provisions of of 49 CFR Part 232,
Brake System Safety Standards for
Freight and Other Non-Passenger Trains
and Equipment. Specifically, UP is
requesting a waiver of 49 CFR 232.213,
Extended Haul Trains, to the extent
necessary to allow UP to operate certain
trains up to 1,800 miles between Class
I brake inspections. The current
regulation restricts extended haul train
movements to 1,500 miles.
UP states that if this request is
granted, they would utilize it to operate
approximately 50 such trains each day.
Most of these trains are coal and
intermodal trains, along with some
automotive trains. UP commits to
complying with all other provisions of
§ 232.213 using qualified UP
mechanical inspectors. UP also states
that if this waiver is approved, no UP
employee in active service at points
where train inspections will no longer
be performed, due to this waiver, will be
furloughed as a result of the waiver. UP
claims that they have provided this
commitment in writing to the
Brotherhood of Railway Carmen.
However, UP retains the right to relocate
such employees if necessary.
UP believes this request is justified
because they experience low defect rates
on extended haul trains that are
currently operating in coal, intermodal,
and automotive service. Of the 15,911
inspections performed on extended haul
trains during a three year period, only
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:47 Jan 21, 2009
Jkt 217001
0.49 percent of the inspections revealed
FRA defects. UP’s expanded use of
wayside detection technologies has
allowed UP to further improve safety by
enabling it to identify defects not
readily identified by train inspections.
Of further note, UP points out that
Canadian rail operators have been
permitted to operate certain trains from
origin to destination within Canada,
without undergoing intermediate brake
test and train inspections. While this
allows Canadian operators to operate
some trains distances of more than
2,000 miles without undergoing
intermediate inspections, the change
has not resulted in adverse safety
effects.
UP claims that granting this request
will give UP the flexibility it needs to
concentrate its train inspections at
terminals with greatest resources, which
are best equipped to perform
inspections in a safe expeditious
manner. It would also lead to improved
operating efficiencies and increased
train velocities. The resulting decrease
in en route delays would have the
added benefit of allowing train crews to
complete their journeys in shorter
amounts of time and reduce fuel
consumption. UP estimates that if this
waiver is granted, they will save
approximately 350,000 gallons of fuel
annually through the elimination of
certain inspections at Elko, NV,
Pocatello, ID, and Salt Lake City, UT.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2008–
0165) and may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Communications received within 45
days of the date of this notice will be
considered by FRA before final action is
taken. Comments received after that
date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.—5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
Issued in Washington, DC on January 14,
2009.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9–1218 Filed 1–21–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Office of Hazardous Materials Safety;
Notice of Delays in Processing of
Special Permits Applications
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: List of applications delayed
more than 180 days.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(c),
PHMSA is publishing the following list
of special permit applications that have
been in process for 180 days or more.
The reason(s) for delay and the expected
completion date for action on each
application is provided in association
with each identified application.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Delmer F. Billings, Director, Office of
Hazardous Materials Special Permits
and Approvals, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, U.S.
Department of Transportation, East
Building, PHH–30, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001, (202) 366–4535.
E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM
22JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 13 (Thursday, January 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1218]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration
(FRA) received a request for a waiver of compliance from certain
requirements of its safety standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party seeking relief, the regulatory
provisions involved, the nature of the relief being requested, and the
petitioner's arguments in favor of relief.
Union Pacific Railroad Company
[Docket Number FRA-2008-0165]
The Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) seeks a waiver of
compliance from certain provisions of of 49 CFR Part 232, Brake System
Safety Standards for Freight and Other Non-Passenger Trains and
Equipment. Specifically, UP is requesting a waiver of 49 CFR 232.213,
Extended Haul Trains, to the extent necessary to allow UP to operate
certain trains up to 1,800 miles between Class I brake inspections. The
current regulation restricts extended haul train movements to 1,500
miles.
UP states that if this request is granted, they would utilize it to
operate approximately 50 such trains each day. Most of these trains are
coal and intermodal trains, along with some automotive trains. UP
commits to complying with all other provisions of Sec. 232.213 using
qualified UP mechanical inspectors. UP also states that if this waiver
is approved, no UP employee in active service at points where train
inspections will no longer be performed, due to this waiver, will be
furloughed as a result of the waiver. UP claims that they have provided
this commitment in writing to the Brotherhood of Railway Carmen.
However, UP retains the right to relocate such employees if necessary.
UP believes this request is justified because they experience low
defect rates on extended haul trains that are currently operating in
coal, intermodal, and automotive service. Of the 15,911 inspections
performed on extended haul trains during a three year period, only 0.49
percent of the inspections revealed FRA defects. UP's expanded use of
wayside detection technologies has allowed UP to further improve safety
by enabling it to identify defects not readily identified by train
inspections. Of further note, UP points out that Canadian rail
operators have been permitted to operate certain trains from origin to
destination within Canada, without undergoing intermediate brake test
and train inspections. While this allows Canadian operators to operate
some trains distances of more than 2,000 miles without undergoing
intermediate inspections, the change has not resulted in adverse safety
effects.
UP claims that granting this request will give UP the flexibility
it needs to concentrate its train inspections at terminals with
greatest resources, which are best equipped to perform inspections in a
safe expeditious manner. It would also lead to improved operating
efficiencies and increased train velocities. The resulting decrease in
en route delays would have the added benefit of allowing train crews to
complete their journeys in shorter amounts of time and reduce fuel
consumption. UP estimates that if this waiver is granted, they will
save approximately 350,000 gallons of fuel annually through the
elimination of certain inspections at Elko, NV, Pocatello, ID, and Salt
Lake City, UT.
Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-
2008-0165) and may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Web site: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Communications received within 45 days of the date of this notice
will be considered by FRA before final action is taken. Comments
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All
written communications concerning these proceedings are available for
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.--5 p.m.) at the above
facility. All documents in the public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet at the docket facility's Web
site at https://www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages
19477-78).
Issued in Washington, DC on January 14, 2009.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program
Development.
[FR Doc. E9-1218 Filed 1-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P