Request for Comments on the Draft Proposed 5-Year Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and Gas Leasing Program for 2010-2015 and Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Proposed 5-Year Program, 3631-3635 [E9-1062]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 21, 2009 / Notices mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Note: This description will be replaced on completion of a resurvey and final approval of the official plat of survey. In accordance with the R&PP Act, Eureka County filed an application to construct a fire station on approximately 1.25 acres. Additional detailed information pertaining to this application, plan of development, and site plans are in case file N–84312 located in the BLM Battle Mountain District Office. The land is not needed for any Federal purpose. The lease and subsequent conveyance is consistent with the Shoshone/Eureka Resource Management Plan, dated February 26, 1986, and would be in the public interest. The lease and subsequent conveyance will be subject to the provisions of the R&PP Act, applicable regulations of the Secretary of the Interior, and will contain the following reservations to the United States: 1. A right-of-way thereon for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States, Act of August 30, 1890 (43 U.S.C. 945); and 2. All minerals, together with the right to prospect for, mine, and remove such deposits from the same under applicable law and such regulations as the Secretary of the Interior may prescribe. The lease/conveyance will also be subject to: Valid existing rights. On publication of this notice in the Federal Register the land described will be segregated from all other forms of appropriation under the public land laws, including the general mining laws, except for lease and conveyance under the R&PP Act, leasing under the mineral leasing laws, and disposals under the mineral material disposal laws. Interested parties may submit comments involving the suitability of the land for a fire station. Comments on the classification are restricted to whether the land is physically suited for the proposal, whether the use will maximize the future use or uses of the land, whether the use is consistent with local planning and zoning, or if the use is consistent with State and Federal programs. Interested parties may submit comments regarding the specific use proposed in the application and plan of development, whether the BLM followed proper administrative procedures in reaching the decision to lease and later convey under the R&PP Act, or any other factor not directly related to the suitability of the land for R&PP use. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your VerDate Nov<24>2008 18:54 Jan 16, 2009 Jkt 217001 comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Only written comments submitted by postal service or overnight mail to the BLM Manager, Mount Lewis Field Office, will be considered properly filed. Electronic mail, facsimile, or telephone comments will not be considered properly filed. Comments, including names and addresses of respondents, will be available for public review. Before including your address, telephone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, be advised that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Any adverse comments will be reviewed by the BLM Nevada State Director. In the absence of any adverse comments, the classification of the land described in this notice will become effective 60 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The lands will not be available for lease and conveyance until after the classification becomes effective. Authority: 43 CFR 2741.5. Dated: January 9, 2009. Douglas W. Furtado, Field Manager, Mount Lewis Field Office. [FR Doc. E9–1026 Filed 1–16–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Minerals Management Service Request for Comments on the Draft Proposed 5-Year Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and Gas Leasing Program for 2010–2015 and Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Proposed 5-Year Program AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior. ACTION: Request for Comments. SUMMARY: The Minerals Management Service (MMS) requests comments on the Draft Proposed 5-year OCS Oil and Gas Leasing Program for 2010–2015 (DPP). This draft proposal is for a new PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 3631 oil and gas program to succeed the current program that is currently set to expire on June 30, 2012, and forms the basis for conducting the studies and analyses the Secretary will consider in making future decisions on what areas of the OCS to include in the program. Section 18 of the OCS Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1344) specifies a multi-step process of consultation and analysis that must be completed before the Secretary of the Interior may approve a new 5-year program. The required steps following this notice include the development of a proposed program, a proposed final program, and Secretarial approval. Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the MMS also will prepare an EIS for the new 5-year program. DATES: Please submit comments and information to the MMS no later than March 23, 2009. Public Comment Procedure The MMS will accept comments in one of two formats: By mail or our Internet commenting system. Please submit your comments using only one of these formats, and include full names and addresses. Comments submitted by other means may not be considered. We will not consider anonymous comments, and we will make available for inspection in their entirety all comments submitted by organizations and businesses or by individuals identifying themselves as representatives of organizations and businesses. Our practice is to make comments, including the names and home addresses of respondents, available for public review. An individual commenter may ask that we withhold his or her name, home address, or both from the public record, and we will honor such a request to the extent allowable by law. If you submit comments and wish us to withhold such information, you must so state prominently at the beginning of your submission. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the DPP by any of the following methods. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Under the tab ‘‘More Search Options,’’ click ‘‘Advanced Docket Search,’’ then select ‘‘Minerals Management Service’’ from the agency drop-down menu, then click the submit button. In the Docket ID column, select MMS–2008–OMM–0045 to submit public comments and to view related materials available for this Notice. Information on using Regulations.gov, including instructions E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM 21JAN1 3632 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 21, 2009 / Notices for accessing documents, submitting comments, and viewing the docket after the close of the comment period, is available through the site’s ‘‘User Tips’’ link. The MMS will post all comments on the DPP. • Mail or hand-carry comments to the Department of the Interior; Minerals Management Service; Attention: Leasing Division (LD); 381 Elden Street, MS– 4010; Herndon, Virginia 20170–4817. Please reference ‘‘2010–2015 Oil and Gas Leasing in the Outer Continental Shelf,’’ in your comments and include your name and return address. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Renee Orr, 5-Year Program Manager, at (703) 787–1215. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The MMS requests comments from states, local governments, Native groups, tribes, the oil and gas industry, Federal agencies, environmental and other interest organizations, and all other interested parties to assist in the preparation of a 5-year draft proposed OCS oil and gas leasing program for 2010–2015 and the applicable EIS. The draft proposed program (DPP) document may be downloaded off the MMS Web site at https://www.mms.gov. The document also is available as part of our electronic commenting system noted above. Hard copies will be made available by contacting the 5-Year Program Office at 703–787–1215. mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Background Section 18 of the OCS Lands Act requires the Secretary of the Interior to prepare and maintain a schedule of proposed OCS oil and gas lease sales determined to ‘‘best meet national energy needs for the 5-year period following its approval or reapproval.’’ This DPP is the first proposed schedule of OCS lease sales for the 2010–2015 timeframe. The areas identified as proposed program areas in this notice are ones that warrant further study and analysis based on oil and gas resource estimates and comments received in response to the Request for Information published in the Federal Register on August 1, 2008 (73 FR 45065). Inclusion of areas in the draft proposed lease sale schedule provides a basis for gathering information and conducting analyses to inform policy makers whether to include these areas for leasing consideration in the new 5-year program. Before the new 5-year program is approved and implemented, the MMS must accept and consider comments on the DPP and issue for public review a proposed program, a draft EIS, a proposed final program, and a final EIS. The MMS will also evaluate prospective VerDate Nov<24>2008 18:54 Jan 16, 2009 Jkt 217001 alternative energy projects on the OCS during the period of 2010 to 2015. In order to produce the next 5-year planning document (the Proposed Program) MMS will consider the potential interaction between alternative energy projects and potential oil and natural gas leasing activities in the 2010–2015 5-Year Program. Summary of the Draft Proposed Program While the DPP includes a schedule of sales, the intent of this document and associated materials are to make clear that the Secretary is not recommending any particular areas be included in or excluded from the eventual final program. Rather, it is designed to gather information, allowing the process to move forward in a way that will allow the next Administration to design the program that best fits their assessment of how to balance energy needs and environmental risks and benefits. In developing the DPP for 2010–2015, the MMS considered oil and gas leasing in the areas of the OCS that are included in the current 5-year program for 2007– 2012 and additional areas off Alaska, Pacific coast, the Gulf of Mexico, and Atlantic coast. Some of these additional areas had been subject to annual congressional moratoria prohibiting oil and gas leasing. However, the moratoria expired on September 30, 2008. The DPP includes lease sales in offshore areas that have the highest oil and gas resource values and highest industry interest, as well as areas that are off the coasts of states that have expressed interest in learning more about potential energy exploration off their coasts. Forty-seven comments from oil and gas companies or associations nominated specific planning areas to be included in the new 5-Year program; some nominated all planning areas. The DPP was determined in the context of these comments, within the broader considerations of offshore energy, including alternative energy. It is uncertain whether the final decision on the 5-Year Program will include as many areas as are included in DPP. Such decisions on the size, timing and location of sales will rest with the next Administration. This DPP provides the next Administration with the maximum flexibility and the maximum available information to make these important decisions. To that end, the following questions will need to be addressed regarding the areas of the OCS that may be made available for leasing: • Should there be buffer zones (i.e., areas where certain activities are prohibited or restricted)? If so, how PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 large should they be? What criteria should be used for setting them (e.g., visual impacts, infrastructure, etc.)? Should they be uniform in all new areas or vary by area according to issues of concern and/or technical constraints? • Are there specific areas/subareas that should be excluded because they are particularly sensitive? Or because oil and gas activities may significantly conflict, in some areas, with other uses for which the area/subarea might be better suited (e.g., alternative energy)? • This Administration views revenue sharing as a strong feature of state participation in coastal resource development. When the President modified the presidential withdrawal, he called upon Congress to address new legislation to enhance current revenue sharing laws, to allow broader state participation in fiscal planning related to future coastal resource development. Please provide your views on what policies and programs MMS, Congress and the Administration should consider relative to OCS revenue sharing. • For those areas proposed for leasing consideration in the Southern California Planning Area, in deciding the next steps in the 5-year program preparation, should MMS include a requirement for mandatory unitization to potentially limit the number of structures in one or more of these areas? The DPP also outlines prospective resources and the forecast for resources revenue. The MMS plans to complete an update of their 2006 National Assessment in early 2010 which should be available prior to publication of the Proposed Final Program. It is important to note that the DPP invites comment from coastal states on how OCS resources are developed off their shores. Despite efforts on the part of the Administration to urge Congress to take up revenue sharing legislation, Congress has not expanded revenue sharing outside of the four Gulf States. Other coastal states could share in revenues from leasing starting at the offshore state/Federal boundary, based upon the inherent revenue sharing built into section 8(g) of the OCS Lands Act. Congress could also establish a broader revenue sharing program. In the August 1, 2008 Request for Information, the governors of all 50 states were specifically asked for their comments, particularly on issues that are unique to each state, such as revenue sharing, in light of the energy situation and the President’s July 14, 2008, action to remove the previous Presidential prohibition of certain OCS oil and gas leasing. The 2008 expiration of the congressional moratoria on OCS oil and E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM 21JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 21, 2009 / Notices gas leasing highlights new issues related to participation in revenue sharing. Proposed Lease Sales for Consideration The DPP proposes a total of 31 OCS lease sales in 12 areas (4 areas off Alaska, 3 areas off the Atlantic coast, 2 areas off the Pacific coast, and 3 areas in the Gulf of Mexico). Maps A and B show the areas proposed for leasing (DPP areas). Table A lists the location and timing of the proposed lease sales. TABLE A—DRAFT PROPOSED PROGRAM FOR 2010–2015—LEASE SALE SCHEDULE Sale Number 225 215 212 216 218 226 227 214 219 220 222 221 228 229 230 231 217 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... Area Year Eastern Gulf of Mexico ..... Western Gulf of Mexico .... Chukchi Sea ...................... Central Gulf of Mexico ...... Western Gulf of Mexico .... Eastern Gulf of Mexico* .... Central Gulf of Mexico* ..... North Aleutian Basin ......... Cook Inlet .......................... Mid-Atlantic ....................... Central Gulf of Mexico ...... Chukchi Sea ...................... Southern California ........... Western Gulf of Mexico .... Mid-Atlantic ....................... Central Gulf of Mexico ...... Beaufort Sea ..................... North Atlantic .................... Western Gulf of Mexico .... Eastern Gulf of Mexico* .... Central Gulf of Mexico ...... Northern California ............ Chukchi Sea ...................... Western Gulf of Mexico .... North Aleutian Basin ......... South Atlantic .................... Central Gulf of Mexico ...... Beaufort Sea ..................... Southern California ........... Cook Inlet .......................... Mid-Atlantic ....................... 2010 2010 2010 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2015 2015 2015 2015 2015 mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES * Program area for lease sales would be expanded if Congress passes new legislation to lift any or all of the moratorium mandated by GOMESA. Alaska Region In the Alaska Region, the DPP schedules multiple lease sales in the Beaufort Sea, Chukchi Sea, and North Aleutian Basin Planning Areas. The multiple sales that are scheduled are consistent with the Governor of Alaska’s recommendations and the state’s administration of its offshore oil and gas program. The schedule for proposed sales in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas are staggered by year with each other and timed to allow for possible new data from drilling between sales. The DPP expands the program areas to the entire planning areas for the Beaufort VerDate Nov<24>2008 18:54 Jan 16, 2009 Jkt 217001 and Chukchi Seas, but the two subsistence deferrals in the Beaufort Sea and the 25-mile no-leasing buffer in the Chukchi Sea are continued from the current 5-year program. Two proposed sales are scheduled in the North Aleutian Basin, a sale in 2011 in the current 5-year program and a second sale in 2014. The proposed program area is limited to that area included in the current program, commonly called the Sale 92 area. The Cook Inlet Planning Area is included in the DPP as a special interest sale area. The proposed sales are scheduled for 2011 and 2015, but before MMS proceeds, it will issue a request for nominations and comments and will move forward only after consideration of the comments received in response to annual calls for information. If the comments from a call for information do not support consideration of a sale, the sale will be postponed and a request for nominations and comments will be issued again the following year, and so on through the 5-year schedule, until a sale is held or the schedule expires. Pacific Region The Pacific Region consists of 4 planning areas—Washington-Oregon, Northern California, Central California, and Southern California. The DPP schedules one sale in the Northern California Planning Area and two in the Southern California Planning Area. The proposed sales are in areas of known hydrocarbon potential—the Point Arena Basin in Northern California, and the Santa Maria, Santa Barbara/Ventura, and Oceanside/Capistrano Basins in Southern California. For each of these basins, the MMS also requests comments on including in the next steps in the 5-year program a requirement for mandatory unitization to potentially limit the number of structures in one or more of these areas. The proposed program area for the first sale in the Southern California Planning Area includes the Ecological Preserve offshore Santa Barbara for leasing but with access available only by directional drilling from structures outside the Preserve. Gulf of Mexico Region The DPP includes sales in all three areas of the Gulf of Mexico Region— Western, Central and Eastern. The Central and Western Gulf of Mexico Planning Areas remain the two areas of highest national resource potential and interest. The DPP would continue the customary practice of annual lease sales in these two areas, offering all the area that is not leased or under restriction. In addition, a second proposed sale is PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 3633 scheduled for 2011 in a small portion of the Central Gulf of Mexico Planning Area. This portion was recently made available with the lifting of restrictions. Three sales are proposed for the Eastern Gulf of Mexico Planning Area, starting in 2010, offering all the area that is not leased or under restriction. The majority of the planning area is under restriction pursuant to GOMESA. The DPP area encompasses a portion of the planning area in the event that the restriction is lifted or modified during the 2010–2015 timeframe. The DPP includes a 75-mile wide no permanent surface structures zone, with no leasing eastward of that zone. This area has been configured to preliminarily address military multiple use issues. Dialogue with the Department of Defense will continue through the development of this 5-Year Program and throughout the pre-lease process. To the extent that GOMESA restrictions remain in effect during the duration of the program, the program area for these sales would include the area offered in Sale 224 in 2008 as mandated by GOMESA plus a small portion to the south of the Sale 224 area recently made available with the lifting of restrictions. Atlantic OCS There are four planning areas in the Atlantic OCS—North Atlantic, MidAtlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits of Florida. The DPP proposes one sale each in the North and South Atlantic Planning Areas and three sales in the Mid-Atlantic Planning Area. Sale 220, offshore Virginia is the first of the three sales. In the current program, the Sale 220 program area includes a 50-mile no leasing buffer. However, for the two subsequent sales, the DPP area for the entire Mid-Atlantic planning area contains no buffers at this time. The Department will continue to be responsive to the position of the Commonwealth of Virginia regarding a 50-mile buffer during subsequent steps in the 5-year program process and during the individual lease sale process. No sales are proposed for the Straits of Florida Planning Area. Assurance of Fair Market Value Section 18 of the OCS Lands Act requires receipt of fair market value from OCS oil and gas leases. The MMS expects to continue using a two-phase post-sale bid evaluation process that it has used since 1983 to meet the fair market value requirement. Further, the DPP provides that MMS may set minimum bid levels, rental rates, and royalty rates by individual lease sale based on its assessment of market and E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM 21JAN1 3634 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 21, 2009 / Notices resource conditions closer to the date of the sale. mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Information Requested for the Draft Proposed Program We request all interested and affected parties to comment on the size, timing, and location of leasing and the procedures for assuring fair market value that are proposed in the Draft Proposed 5-Year OCS Oil and Gas Leasing Program for 2010–2015. Respondents who submitted information in response to the August 1, 2008 Federal Register notice requesting comments on preparing the 5-year program for 2010–2015, may wish to reference that information, as appropriate, rather than repeating it in their comments on the DPP. We also invite comments and suggestions on how to proceed with the section 18 analysis for the next draft of the new program, the proposed program. Section 18(g) authorizes confidential treatment of privileged or proprietary information that is submitted. In order to protect the confidentiality of such information, respondents should include it as an attachment to other comments submitted and mark it appropriately. On request, the MMS will treat such information as confidential from the time of its receipt until 5 years after approval of the new leasing program, subject to the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act. The MMS will not treat as confidential any aggregate summaries of such information, the names of respondents, and comments not containing such information. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Preparation Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of NEPA, the MMS intends to prepare an EIS for the new 5-year OCS oil and gas leasing program for 2010–2015. This notice starts the formal scoping process for the EIS under 40 CFR 1501.7, and solicits information regarding issues and alternatives that should be evaluated in the EIS. The EIS will analyze the potential impacts of the adoption of the proposed 5-year program. The comments that MMS has received in response to the August 2008, Request for Comments, and the comments received during scoping for the 2007– 2012 5-Year EIS have identified environmental issues and concerns that MMS will consider in the EIS. In summary, these include climate change as an impact factor in cumulative analyses, the effects of the OCS program on climate change, potential impacts from accidental oil spills, potential impacts to tourism and recreation VerDate Nov<24>2008 18:54 Jan 16, 2009 Jkt 217001 activities, and ecological impacts from potential degradation of marine and coastal habitats. Additionally alternatives will be developed and analyzed during the EIS process based on scoping comments and governmental communications. Alternatives may include increasing or decreasing the number or frequency of sales, coastal buffers, limiting areas available for leasing, and excluding parts of or entire planning areas. Additional issues and alternatives will be addressed as a result of the request for supplemental information from stakeholders asked to respond to the four questions in the Notice above that specifically request comments on buffer zones, including the criteria that should be used to set them and whether they should be uniformly across the nation, and on whether certain areas and subareas should be excluded because of particular environmental sensitivity or because of a preferred alternative use (e.g., alternative energy), broader revenue sharing policies, and potential mandatory unitization in certain areas. Written Scoping Comments for the EIS The MMS will consider comments for the purposes of determining the scope of the EIS we plan to prepare. Comments on the relationship between the Oil and Gas Program and the Alternative Energy Program are also welcome. Interested parties may submit their written scoping comments until March 23, 2009 to Mr. J.F. Bennett, Chief, Branch of Environmental Assessment, Minerals Management Service, 381 Elden Street, MS 4042, Herndon, Virginia 20170, or online at https://www.regulations.gov. Under the tab ‘‘More Search Options,’’ click ‘‘Advanced Docket Search,’’ then select ‘‘Minerals Management Service’’ from the agency drop-down menu, then click the submit button. In the Docket ID column, select MMS–2008–OMM–0046 to submit public comments and to view related materials available for this Notice. Information on using Regulations.gov, including instructions for accessing documents, submitting comments, and viewing the docket after the close of the comment period, is available through the site’s ‘‘User Tips’’ link. Our practice is to make comments, including names and addresses of respondents available for public review. Individual commenters may ask that we withhold their name, home address, or both from the public record, and we will try to honor such a request to the extent allowable by law. If you submit comments and wish us to withhold such information, you must state so PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 prominently at the beginning of your submission. We will not consider anonymous comments, and we will make available for inspection in their entirety all comments submitted by organizations or businesses or by individuals identifying themselves as representatives of organizations or businesses. Scoping Meetings Meetings will be held between now and March 23, 2009 to receive scoping comments on the EIS. Several meetings will be scheduled to take advantage of existing venues for other MMS meetings. In Alaska the following public hearings on the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea Planning Areas Multisale DEIS are also expected to take scoping comments for the 5-year EIS. We have specifics on three locations as follows: • Kaktovik, Alaska: Public Hearing from 7–10 p.m., Tuesday, February 3, Kaktovik Community Center; • Nuiqsut, Alaska: Public Hearing from 7–10 p.m., Wednesday, February 4, Kisik Community Center; and, • Barrow, Alaska: Public Hearing from 7–10 p.m., Friday, February 6, Inupiat Heritage Center. Additional public scoping meetings for the 5-year EIS are being planned for, but are not necessarily limited to the following cities: • Anchorage, Alaska; • Wainwright, Alaska; • Point Lay, Alaska; • Point Hope, Alaska; • Dillingham, Alaska; • Naknek/King Salmon, Alaska; • Sand Point, Alaska; • Nelson Lagoon, Alaska; • Cold Bay, Alaska; • King Cove, Alaska; • Unalaska/Dutch Harbor, Alaska; • Seattle, Washington; • Ft. Bragg/Ukiah, California; • Oceanside/San Diego, California; • Santa Maria/Santa Barbara, California; • Houston, Texas; • New Orleans, Louisiana; • Mobile, Alabama; • Tallahassee, Florida; • Tampa/St. Petersburg, Florida; • Savannah, Georgia; • Wilmington, North Carolina; • Norfolk, Virginia; • New York, New York/Atlantic City, New Jersey; • Boston, Massachusetts; and • Washington, DC. Specific times and venues will be posted on the MMS Web site and published in the Federal Register per 40 CFR 1506.6. Cooperating Agency The Department of the Interior invites other Federal agencies, state, tribal, and E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM 21JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 21, 2009 / Notices local governments to consider becoming cooperating agencies in the preparation of the EIS. We invite qualified government entities to inquire about cooperating agency status for the EIS for the proposed 5-year program. Using the guidelines from the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), qualified agencies and governments are those with ‘‘jurisdiction by law or special expertise.’’ Potential cooperating agencies should consider their authority and capacity to assume the responsibilities of a cooperating agency and to remember that an agency’s role in the environmental analysis neither enlarges nor diminishes the final decision making authority of any other agency involved in the NEPA process. Agencies should also consider the ‘‘Factors for determining Cooperating Agency Status’’ in Attachment 1 to CEQ’s January 30, 2002, Memorandum for the Heads of Federal Agencies: Cooperating Agencies in Implementing the Procedural Requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act. The appropriate pages can be found at: https://ceq.hss.doe.gov/nepa/regs/ cooperating/cooperatingagencies memorandum.html and https://ceq.hss. doe.gov/nepa/regs/cooperating/ cooperatingagencymemofactors.html. The MMS, as the lead agency, will not provide financial assistance to cooperating agencies. Even if an organization is not a cooperating agency, opportunities will exist to provide information and comments to MMS during the normal public input phases of the NEPA/EIS process. MMS will also consult with tribal governments on a government-togovernment basis. If further information about cooperating agencies is needed, please contact Mr. James F. Bennett, at (703) 787–1660. Next Steps in the Process mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES The MMS plans to issue the proposed program and draft EIS in mid-summer 2009 for a 90-day comment period. We plan to issue the proposed final program and final EIS in spring 2010. The Secretary may approve the new 5-year program 60 days later to go into effect as of July 1, 2010. Dated: January 8, 2009. Randall B. Luthi, Director, Minerals Management Service. [FR Doc. E9–1062 Filed 1–16–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P VerDate Nov<24>2008 18:54 Jan 16, 2009 Jkt 217001 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Minerals Management Service Cape Wind Energy Project AGENCY: Minerals Management Service (MMS), Interior. ACTION: Notice of Availability (NOA) of final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed Cape Wind Energy Project on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) off Massachusetts, in Nantucket Sound; Request for Comment. SUMMARY: The MMS is announcing the availability of a final EIS for the proposed Cape Wind Energy Project. Cape Wind Associates, LLC (CWA) has requested a lease, easement or right-ofway, pursuant to section 8(p) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) (43 U.S.C. 1337) as amended, and proposes to construct and operate a wind energy facility on the OCS off Massachusetts, in Nantucket Sound. The final EIS is intended to inform the public of the proposed action and reasonable alternatives, including the ‘‘no action’’ alternative; analyze the direct, indirect, and cumulative environmental effects of the proposed action and each of the reasonable alternatives; address public comment received on the draft EIS that was released in January 2008; and provide information to support decision-making. Authority: This NOA is published pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. (1988)) and regulations (40 CFR 1506.6) implementing the provisions of NEPA. The MMS has received a request from CWA for a lease, easement or right-of-way to construct and operate a wind energy project on Horseshoe Shoal on the OCS in Nantucket Sound. The proposed project would consist of 130 offshore wind turbine generators arranged to maximize the project’s full potential electric output of approximately 468 megawatts. Each turbine would be approximately 440 feet high. The proposed wind turbine array would occupy approximately 25 square miles, and would be located approximately 5.6 miles from the coast of Cape Cod, Massachusetts, 9 miles from the coast of Martha’s Vineyard, and 13.8 miles from the coast of Nantucket Island. The proposed array would be in a grid formation where the distance between each turbine is proposed to be one-third mile from north to south and one-half mile from east to west. The windgenerated electricity from each of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 3635 turbines would be transmitted via a 33kilovolt submarine transmission cable system to a centrally located electric service platform. This platform would transform and transmit electric power via two 115-kilovolt lines extending over 12 miles to the Cape Cod mainland, where it would ultimately connect with the existing power grid. In November 2001, CWA filed a permit application with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), New England District, under section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, in anticipation of constructing a wind project located on Horseshoe Shoal in Nantucket Sound. The USACE released a draft EIS concerning issuance of the section 10 permit in November 2004. Subsequently, Section 388 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct) amended the OCSLA to give the Department of the Interior, in consultation with other relevant federal agencies, authority for issuing leases, easements, or rights-of-way for alternative energy projects on the OCS. Additional information on the MMS Offshore Alternative Energy Program can be found at: https://www.mms.gov/ offshore/alternativeenergy/. After reviewing the draft EIS prepared by the USACE, which was completed prior to the EPAct amendment of the OCSLA, the MMS prepared its own draft EIS analyzing the potential impacts of the project under the broader authority granted to it under the OCSLA, as amended. The MMS launched a renewed scoping process by publishing in the Federal Register (71 FR 30693) on May 30, 2006, a notice of intent to prepare the EIS. The 1,321 public comments received in response to that notice were considered and taken into account in the draft EIS, as well as the final EIS. The MMS also considered and took into account over 5,000 public comments made during the review period for the USACE draft EIS, as well as those made at USACE public hearings held in Yarmouth, Martha’s Vineyard, Cambridge, and Nantucket, Massachusetts. On January 18, 2008, MMS published a notice in the Federal Register stating the availability of the draft EIS. The public comment period lasted 60 days (until March 20, 2008) and then was extended another 30 days to April 21, 2008, to provide the public with additional time to review the draft EIS and provide comment. The MMS received comments through its Public Connect Web site, via e-mails, via oral and paper copy comments provided at the four public hearings: (the Mattacheese Middle School in West Yarmouth, Massachusetts; the E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM 21JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3631-3635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1062]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service


Request for Comments on the Draft Proposed 5-Year Outer 
Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and Gas Leasing Program for 2010-2015 and 
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for 
the Proposed 5-Year Program

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

ACTION: Request for Comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Minerals Management Service (MMS) requests comments on the 
Draft Proposed 5-year OCS Oil and Gas Leasing Program for 2010-2015 
(DPP). This draft proposal is for a new oil and gas program to succeed 
the current program that is currently set to expire on June 30, 2012, 
and forms the basis for conducting the studies and analyses the 
Secretary will consider in making future decisions on what areas of the 
OCS to include in the program.
    Section 18 of the OCS Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1344) specifies a multi-
step process of consultation and analysis that must be completed before 
the Secretary of the Interior may approve a new 5-year program. The 
required steps following this notice include the development of a 
proposed program, a proposed final program, and Secretarial approval. 
Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the MMS also 
will prepare an EIS for the new 5-year program.

DATES: Please submit comments and information to the MMS no later than 
March 23, 2009.

Public Comment Procedure

    The MMS will accept comments in one of two formats: By mail or our 
Internet commenting system. Please submit your comments using only one 
of these formats, and include full names and addresses. Comments 
submitted by other means may not be considered. We will not consider 
anonymous comments, and we will make available for inspection in their 
entirety all comments submitted by organizations and businesses or by 
individuals identifying themselves as representatives of organizations 
and businesses.
    Our practice is to make comments, including the names and home 
addresses of respondents, available for public review. An individual 
commenter may ask that we withhold his or her name, home address, or 
both from the public record, and we will honor such a request to the 
extent allowable by law. If you submit comments and wish us to withhold 
such information, you must so state prominently at the beginning of 
your submission.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the DPP by any of the following 
methods.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Under the tab ``More Search Options,'' click ``Advanced Docket 
Search,'' then select ``Minerals Management Service'' from the agency 
drop-down menu, then click the submit button. In the Docket ID column, 
select MMS-2008-OMM-0045 to submit public comments and to view related 
materials available for this Notice. Information on using 
Regulations.gov, including instructions

[[Page 3632]]

for accessing documents, submitting comments, and viewing the docket 
after the close of the comment period, is available through the site's 
``User Tips'' link. The MMS will post all comments on the DPP.
     Mail or hand-carry comments to the Department of the 
Interior; Minerals Management Service; Attention: Leasing Division 
(LD); 381 Elden Street, MS-4010; Herndon, Virginia 20170-4817. Please 
reference ``2010-2015 Oil and Gas Leasing in the Outer Continental 
Shelf,'' in your comments and include your name and return address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Renee Orr, 5-Year Program Manager, at 
(703) 787-1215.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The MMS requests comments from states, local 
governments, Native groups, tribes, the oil and gas industry, Federal 
agencies, environmental and other interest organizations, and all other 
interested parties to assist in the preparation of a 5-year draft 
proposed OCS oil and gas leasing program for 2010-2015 and the 
applicable EIS.
    The draft proposed program (DPP) document may be downloaded off the 
MMS Web site at https://www.mms.gov. The document also is available as 
part of our electronic commenting system noted above. Hard copies will 
be made available by contacting the 5-Year Program Office at 703-787-
1215.

Background

    Section 18 of the OCS Lands Act requires the Secretary of the 
Interior to prepare and maintain a schedule of proposed OCS oil and gas 
lease sales determined to ``best meet national energy needs for the 5-
year period following its approval or reapproval.'' This DPP is the 
first proposed schedule of OCS lease sales for the 2010-2015 timeframe. 
The areas identified as proposed program areas in this notice are ones 
that warrant further study and analysis based on oil and gas resource 
estimates and comments received in response to the Request for 
Information published in the Federal Register on August 1, 2008 (73 FR 
45065). Inclusion of areas in the draft proposed lease sale schedule 
provides a basis for gathering information and conducting analyses to 
inform policy makers whether to include these areas for leasing 
consideration in the new 5-year program. Before the new 5-year program 
is approved and implemented, the MMS must accept and consider comments 
on the DPP and issue for public review a proposed program, a draft EIS, 
a proposed final program, and a final EIS. The MMS will also evaluate 
prospective alternative energy projects on the OCS during the period of 
2010 to 2015. In order to produce the next 5-year planning document 
(the Proposed Program) MMS will consider the potential interaction 
between alternative energy projects and potential oil and natural gas 
leasing activities in the 2010-2015 5-Year Program.

Summary of the Draft Proposed Program

    While the DPP includes a schedule of sales, the intent of this 
document and associated materials are to make clear that the Secretary 
is not recommending any particular areas be included in or excluded 
from the eventual final program. Rather, it is designed to gather 
information, allowing the process to move forward in a way that will 
allow the next Administration to design the program that best fits 
their assessment of how to balance energy needs and environmental risks 
and benefits.
    In developing the DPP for 2010-2015, the MMS considered oil and gas 
leasing in the areas of the OCS that are included in the current 5-year 
program for 2007-2012 and additional areas off Alaska, Pacific coast, 
the Gulf of Mexico, and Atlantic coast. Some of these additional areas 
had been subject to annual congressional moratoria prohibiting oil and 
gas leasing. However, the moratoria expired on September 30, 2008. The 
DPP includes lease sales in offshore areas that have the highest oil 
and gas resource values and highest industry interest, as well as areas 
that are off the coasts of states that have expressed interest in 
learning more about potential energy exploration off their coasts. 
Forty-seven comments from oil and gas companies or associations 
nominated specific planning areas to be included in the new 5-Year 
program; some nominated all planning areas. The DPP was determined in 
the context of these comments, within the broader considerations of 
offshore energy, including alternative energy.
    It is uncertain whether the final decision on the 5-Year Program 
will include as many areas as are included in DPP. Such decisions on 
the size, timing and location of sales will rest with the next 
Administration. This DPP provides the next Administration with the 
maximum flexibility and the maximum available information to make these 
important decisions. To that end, the following questions will need to 
be addressed regarding the areas of the OCS that may be made available 
for leasing:
     Should there be buffer zones (i.e., areas where certain 
activities are prohibited or restricted)? If so, how large should they 
be? What criteria should be used for setting them (e.g., visual 
impacts, infrastructure, etc.)? Should they be uniform in all new areas 
or vary by area according to issues of concern and/or technical 
constraints?
     Are there specific areas/subareas that should be excluded 
because they are particularly sensitive? Or because oil and gas 
activities may significantly conflict, in some areas, with other uses 
for which the area/subarea might be better suited (e.g., alternative 
energy)?
     This Administration views revenue sharing as a strong 
feature of state participation in coastal resource development. When 
the President modified the presidential withdrawal, he called upon 
Congress to address new legislation to enhance current revenue sharing 
laws, to allow broader state participation in fiscal planning related 
to future coastal resource development. Please provide your views on 
what policies and programs MMS, Congress and the Administration should 
consider relative to OCS revenue sharing.
     For those areas proposed for leasing consideration in the 
Southern California Planning Area, in deciding the next steps in the 5-
year program preparation, should MMS include a requirement for 
mandatory unitization to potentially limit the number of structures in 
one or more of these areas?
    The DPP also outlines prospective resources and the forecast for 
resources revenue. The MMS plans to complete an update of their 2006 
National Assessment in early 2010 which should be available prior to 
publication of the Proposed Final Program. It is important to note that 
the DPP invites comment from coastal states on how OCS resources are 
developed off their shores. Despite efforts on the part of the 
Administration to urge Congress to take up revenue sharing legislation, 
Congress has not expanded revenue sharing outside of the four Gulf 
States. Other coastal states could share in revenues from leasing 
starting at the offshore state/Federal boundary, based upon the 
inherent revenue sharing built into section 8(g) of the OCS Lands Act. 
Congress could also establish a broader revenue sharing program. In the 
August 1, 2008 Request for Information, the governors of all 50 states 
were specifically asked for their comments, particularly on issues that 
are unique to each state, such as revenue sharing, in light of the 
energy situation and the President's July 14, 2008, action to remove 
the previous Presidential prohibition of certain OCS oil and gas 
leasing. The 2008 expiration of the congressional moratoria on OCS oil 
and

[[Page 3633]]

gas leasing highlights new issues related to participation in revenue 
sharing.

Proposed Lease Sales for Consideration

    The DPP proposes a total of 31 OCS lease sales in 12 areas (4 areas 
off Alaska, 3 areas off the Atlantic coast, 2 areas off the Pacific 
coast, and 3 areas in the Gulf of Mexico). Maps A and B show the areas 
proposed for leasing (DPP areas). Table A lists the location and timing 
of the proposed lease sales.

   Table A--Draft Proposed Program for 2010-2015--Lease Sale Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Sale Number                         Area                   Year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
225........................  Eastern Gulf of Mexico............     2010
215........................  Western Gulf of Mexico............     2010
212........................  Chukchi Sea.......................     2010
216........................  Central Gulf of Mexico............     2011
218........................  Western Gulf of Mexico............     2011
226........................  Eastern Gulf of Mexico*...........     2011
227........................  Central Gulf of Mexico*...........     2011
214........................  North Aleutian Basin..............     2011
219........................  Cook Inlet........................     2011
220........................  Mid-Atlantic......................     2011
222........................  Central Gulf of Mexico............     2012
221........................  Chukchi Sea.......................     2012
228........................  Southern California...............     2012
229........................  Western Gulf of Mexico............     2012
230........................  Mid-Atlantic......................     2012
231........................  Central Gulf of Mexico............     2013
217........................  Beaufort Sea......................     2013
232........................  North Atlantic....................     2013
233........................  Western Gulf of Mexico............     2013
234........................  Eastern Gulf of Mexico*...........     2013
235........................  Central Gulf of Mexico............     2014
236........................  Northern California...............     2014
237........................  Chukchi Sea.......................     2014
238........................  Western Gulf of Mexico............     2014
239........................  North Aleutian Basin..............     2014
240........................  South Atlantic....................     2014
241........................  Central Gulf of Mexico............     2015
242........................  Beaufort Sea......................     2015
243........................  Southern California...............     2015
244........................  Cook Inlet........................     2015
245........................  Mid-Atlantic......................    2015
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Program area for lease sales would be expanded if Congress passes new
  legislation to lift any or all of the moratorium mandated by GOMESA.

Alaska Region

    In the Alaska Region, the DPP schedules multiple lease sales in the 
Beaufort Sea, Chukchi Sea, and North Aleutian Basin Planning Areas. The 
multiple sales that are scheduled are consistent with the Governor of 
Alaska's recommendations and the state's administration of its offshore 
oil and gas program. The schedule for proposed sales in the Beaufort 
and Chukchi Seas are staggered by year with each other and timed to 
allow for possible new data from drilling between sales. The DPP 
expands the program areas to the entire planning areas for the Beaufort 
and Chukchi Seas, but the two subsistence deferrals in the Beaufort Sea 
and the 25-mile no-leasing buffer in the Chukchi Sea are continued from 
the current 5-year program.
    Two proposed sales are scheduled in the North Aleutian Basin, a 
sale in 2011 in the current 5-year program and a second sale in 2014. 
The proposed program area is limited to that area included in the 
current program, commonly called the Sale 92 area.
    The Cook Inlet Planning Area is included in the DPP as a special 
interest sale area. The proposed sales are scheduled for 2011 and 2015, 
but before MMS proceeds, it will issue a request for nominations and 
comments and will move forward only after consideration of the comments 
received in response to annual calls for information. If the comments 
from a call for information do not support consideration of a sale, the 
sale will be postponed and a request for nominations and comments will 
be issued again the following year, and so on through the 5-year 
schedule, until a sale is held or the schedule expires.

Pacific Region

    The Pacific Region consists of 4 planning areas--Washington-Oregon, 
Northern California, Central California, and Southern California. The 
DPP schedules one sale in the Northern California Planning Area and two 
in the Southern California Planning Area. The proposed sales are in 
areas of known hydrocarbon potential--the Point Arena Basin in Northern 
California, and the Santa Maria, Santa Barbara/Ventura, and Oceanside/
Capistrano Basins in Southern California. For each of these basins, the 
MMS also requests comments on including in the next steps in the 5-year 
program a requirement for mandatory unitization to potentially limit 
the number of structures in one or more of these areas. The proposed 
program area for the first sale in the Southern California Planning 
Area includes the Ecological Preserve offshore Santa Barbara for 
leasing but with access available only by directional drilling from 
structures outside the Preserve.

Gulf of Mexico Region

    The DPP includes sales in all three areas of the Gulf of Mexico 
Region--Western, Central and Eastern. The Central and Western Gulf of 
Mexico Planning Areas remain the two areas of highest national resource 
potential and interest. The DPP would continue the customary practice 
of annual lease sales in these two areas, offering all the area that is 
not leased or under restriction. In addition, a second proposed sale is 
scheduled for 2011 in a small portion of the Central Gulf of Mexico 
Planning Area. This portion was recently made available with the 
lifting of restrictions.
    Three sales are proposed for the Eastern Gulf of Mexico Planning 
Area, starting in 2010, offering all the area that is not leased or 
under restriction. The majority of the planning area is under 
restriction pursuant to GOMESA. The DPP area encompasses a portion of 
the planning area in the event that the restriction is lifted or 
modified during the 2010-2015 timeframe. The DPP includes a 75-mile 
wide no permanent surface structures zone, with no leasing eastward of 
that zone. This area has been configured to preliminarily address 
military multiple use issues. Dialogue with the Department of Defense 
will continue through the development of this 5-Year Program and 
throughout the pre-lease process. To the extent that GOMESA 
restrictions remain in effect during the duration of the program, the 
program area for these sales would include the area offered in Sale 224 
in 2008 as mandated by GOMESA plus a small portion to the south of the 
Sale 224 area recently made available with the lifting of restrictions.

Atlantic OCS

    There are four planning areas in the Atlantic OCS--North Atlantic, 
Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits of Florida. The DPP proposes 
one sale each in the North and South Atlantic Planning Areas and three 
sales in the Mid-Atlantic Planning Area. Sale 220, offshore Virginia is 
the first of the three sales. In the current program, the Sale 220 
program area includes a 50-mile no leasing buffer. However, for the two 
subsequent sales, the DPP area for the entire Mid-Atlantic planning 
area contains no buffers at this time. The Department will continue to 
be responsive to the position of the Commonwealth of Virginia regarding 
a 50-mile buffer during subsequent steps in the 5-year program process 
and during the individual lease sale process. No sales are proposed for 
the Straits of Florida Planning Area.

Assurance of Fair Market Value

    Section 18 of the OCS Lands Act requires receipt of fair market 
value from OCS oil and gas leases. The MMS expects to continue using a 
two-phase post-sale bid evaluation process that it has used since 1983 
to meet the fair market value requirement. Further, the DPP provides 
that MMS may set minimum bid levels, rental rates, and royalty rates by 
individual lease sale based on its assessment of market and

[[Page 3634]]

resource conditions closer to the date of the sale.

Information Requested for the Draft Proposed Program

    We request all interested and affected parties to comment on the 
size, timing, and location of leasing and the procedures for assuring 
fair market value that are proposed in the Draft Proposed 5-Year OCS 
Oil and Gas Leasing Program for 2010-2015. Respondents who submitted 
information in response to the August 1, 2008 Federal Register notice 
requesting comments on preparing the 5-year program for 2010-2015, may 
wish to reference that information, as appropriate, rather than 
repeating it in their comments on the DPP. We also invite comments and 
suggestions on how to proceed with the section 18 analysis for the next 
draft of the new program, the proposed program.
    Section 18(g) authorizes confidential treatment of privileged or 
proprietary information that is submitted. In order to protect the 
confidentiality of such information, respondents should include it as 
an attachment to other comments submitted and mark it appropriately. On 
request, the MMS will treat such information as confidential from the 
time of its receipt until 5 years after approval of the new leasing 
program, subject to the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act.
    The MMS will not treat as confidential any aggregate summaries of 
such information, the names of respondents, and comments not containing 
such information.

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Preparation

    Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of NEPA, the MMS intends to prepare 
an EIS for the new 5-year OCS oil and gas leasing program for 2010-
2015. This notice starts the formal scoping process for the EIS under 
40 CFR 1501.7, and solicits information regarding issues and 
alternatives that should be evaluated in the EIS. The EIS will analyze 
the potential impacts of the adoption of the proposed 5-year program.
    The comments that MMS has received in response to the August 2008, 
Request for Comments, and the comments received during scoping for the 
2007-2012 5-Year EIS have identified environmental issues and concerns 
that MMS will consider in the EIS. In summary, these include climate 
change as an impact factor in cumulative analyses, the effects of the 
OCS program on climate change, potential impacts from accidental oil 
spills, potential impacts to tourism and recreation activities, and 
ecological impacts from potential degradation of marine and coastal 
habitats. Additionally alternatives will be developed and analyzed 
during the EIS process based on scoping comments and governmental 
communications. Alternatives may include increasing or decreasing the 
number or frequency of sales, coastal buffers, limiting areas available 
for leasing, and excluding parts of or entire planning areas. 
Additional issues and alternatives will be addressed as a result of the 
request for supplemental information from stakeholders asked to respond 
to the four questions in the Notice above that specifically request 
comments on buffer zones, including the criteria that should be used to 
set them and whether they should be uniformly across the nation, and on 
whether certain areas and subareas should be excluded because of 
particular environmental sensitivity or because of a preferred 
alternative use (e.g., alternative energy), broader revenue sharing 
policies, and potential mandatory unitization in certain areas.

Written Scoping Comments for the EIS

    The MMS will consider comments for the purposes of determining the 
scope of the EIS we plan to prepare. Comments on the relationship 
between the Oil and Gas Program and the Alternative Energy Program are 
also welcome. Interested parties may submit their written scoping 
comments until March 23, 2009 to Mr. J.F. Bennett, Chief, Branch of 
Environmental Assessment, Minerals Management Service, 381 Elden 
Street, MS 4042, Herndon, Virginia 20170, or online at https://
www.regulations.gov. Under the tab ``More Search Options,'' click 
``Advanced Docket Search,'' then select ``Minerals Management Service'' 
from the agency drop-down menu, then click the submit button. In the 
Docket ID column, select MMS-2008-OMM-0046 to submit public comments 
and to view related materials available for this Notice. Information on 
using Regulations.gov, including instructions for accessing documents, 
submitting comments, and viewing the docket after the close of the 
comment period, is available through the site's ``User Tips'' link.
    Our practice is to make comments, including names and addresses of 
respondents available for public review. Individual commenters may ask 
that we withhold their name, home address, or both from the public 
record, and we will try to honor such a request to the extent allowable 
by law. If you submit comments and wish us to withhold such 
information, you must state so prominently at the beginning of your 
submission. We will not consider anonymous comments, and we will make 
available for inspection in their entirety all comments submitted by 
organizations or businesses or by individuals identifying themselves as 
representatives of organizations or businesses.

Scoping Meetings

    Meetings will be held between now and March 23, 2009 to receive 
scoping comments on the EIS. Several meetings will be scheduled to take 
advantage of existing venues for other MMS meetings. In Alaska the 
following public hearings on the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea Planning 
Areas Multisale DEIS are also expected to take scoping comments for the 
5-year EIS. We have specifics on three locations as follows:
     Kaktovik, Alaska: Public Hearing from 7-10 p.m., Tuesday, 
February 3, Kaktovik Community Center;
     Nuiqsut, Alaska: Public Hearing from 7-10 p.m., Wednesday, 
February 4, Kisik Community Center; and,
     Barrow, Alaska: Public Hearing from 7-10 p.m., Friday, 
February 6, Inupiat Heritage Center.
    Additional public scoping meetings for the 5-year EIS are being 
planned for, but are not necessarily limited to the following cities:
     Anchorage, Alaska;
     Wainwright, Alaska;
     Point Lay, Alaska;
     Point Hope, Alaska;
     Dillingham, Alaska;
     Naknek/King Salmon, Alaska;
     Sand Point, Alaska;
     Nelson Lagoon, Alaska;
     Cold Bay, Alaska;
     King Cove, Alaska;
     Unalaska/Dutch Harbor, Alaska;
     Seattle, Washington;
     Ft. Bragg/Ukiah, California;
     Oceanside/San Diego, California;
     Santa Maria/Santa Barbara, California;
     Houston, Texas;
     New Orleans, Louisiana;
     Mobile, Alabama;
     Tallahassee, Florida;
     Tampa/St. Petersburg, Florida;
     Savannah, Georgia;
     Wilmington, North Carolina;
     Norfolk, Virginia;
     New York, New York/Atlantic City, New Jersey;
     Boston, Massachusetts; and
     Washington, DC.
    Specific times and venues will be posted on the MMS Web site and 
published in the Federal Register per 40 CFR 1506.6.

Cooperating Agency

    The Department of the Interior invites other Federal agencies, 
state, tribal, and

[[Page 3635]]

local governments to consider becoming cooperating agencies in the 
preparation of the EIS. We invite qualified government entities to 
inquire about cooperating agency status for the EIS for the proposed 5-
year program. Using the guidelines from the Council on Environmental 
Quality (CEQ), qualified agencies and governments are those with 
``jurisdiction by law or special expertise.'' Potential cooperating 
agencies should consider their authority and capacity to assume the 
responsibilities of a cooperating agency and to remember that an 
agency's role in the environmental analysis neither enlarges nor 
diminishes the final decision making authority of any other agency 
involved in the NEPA process. Agencies should also consider the 
``Factors for determining Cooperating Agency Status'' in Attachment 1 
to CEQ's January 30, 2002, Memorandum for the Heads of Federal 
Agencies: Cooperating Agencies in Implementing the Procedural 
Requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act. The appropriate 
pages can be found at: https://ceq.hss.doe.gov/nepa/regs/cooperating/
cooperatingagenciesmemorandum.html and https://ceq.hss.doe.gov/nepa/
regs/cooperating/cooperatingagencymemofactors.html.
    The MMS, as the lead agency, will not provide financial assistance 
to cooperating agencies. Even if an organization is not a cooperating 
agency, opportunities will exist to provide information and comments to 
MMS during the normal public input phases of the NEPA/EIS process. MMS 
will also consult with tribal governments on a government-to-government 
basis. If further information about cooperating agencies is needed, 
please contact Mr. James F. Bennett, at (703) 787-1660.

Next Steps in the Process

    The MMS plans to issue the proposed program and draft EIS in mid-
summer 2009 for a 90-day comment period. We plan to issue the proposed 
final program and final EIS in spring 2010. The Secretary may approve 
the new 5-year program 60 days later to go into effect as of July 1, 
2010.

    Dated: January 8, 2009.
Randall B. Luthi,
Director, Minerals Management Service.
[FR Doc. E9-1062 Filed 1-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.