New Automation Requirements for Detached Addressed Labels, 2866-2867 [E9-859]
Download as PDF
2866
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 11 / Friday, January 16, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—DATES OF TWIC COMPLIANCE AND CANCELLATION OF TSA NAME–BASED VETTING—Continued
If you are in COTP zone . . .
Then your TWIC Compliance date (and the date when you may stop
using the procedure from the April 28, 2006 Notice) is . . .
Buffalo, Detroit, Duluth, Lake Michigan, Sault St. Marie .........................
December 1, 2008 (The original Notice, published at 73 FR 39323, set
a compliance date of October 31, 2008. A new Notice, published at
73 FR 64208, delayed compliance until December 1, 2008).
December 1, 2008 (Notice published at 73 FR 44653).
December 30, 2008 (Notice published at 73 FR 50721).
Charleston, Long Island Sound, Jacksonville, Savannah ........................
Baltimore, Delaware Bay, Mobile, Lower Mississippi River, Ohio Valley,
Pittsburgh, San Diego.
Hampton Roads, Morgan City, New Orleans, Upper Mississippi River,
Miami, Key West, St. Petersburg.
Honolulu, Prince William Sound, Southeast Alaska, Western Alaska .....
Portland, Puget Sound, San Francisco Bay ............................................
New York ..................................................................................................
Guam, Houston-Galveston , Los Angeles-Long Beach, San Juan .........
Port Arthur ................................................................................................
As of the above-listed effective date of
TWIC compliance in each COTP zone,
the Coast Guard is rescinding its
previous direction to COTPs to prevent
access to all facilities regulated under 33
CFR part 125 to persons who do not
have an identification credential listed
in 33 CFR 125.09, as amended by the
April 28, 2006 Notice. Once they have
implemented access control procedures
utilizing TWIC, owners and operators of
these facilities, and unions, may cease
the transmission of information on
employees and longshoremen
(respectively) to TSA. Unless further
notice appears in the Federal Register,
by April 14, 2009, all transmissions of
information under the April 28, 2006
Notice should cease.
Dated: January 12, 2009.
James A. Watson,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Director of
Prevention Policy.
[FR Doc. E9–847 Filed 1–15–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
New Automation Requirements for
Detached Addressed Labels
Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Final rule.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: To make Detached Address
Labels (DALs) accompanying saturation
mailings of Periodicals or Standard
Mail® flats more compatible with our
processing equipment, they must be
automation-compatible and have a
correct delivery point POSTNET(tm)
barcode or Intelligent Mail® barcode
with an 11-digit routing code. This
requirement does not apply to DALs
with simplified addresses. Also, for
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:43 Jan 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
January 13, 2009 (Notice published at 73 FR 52924).
February 12, 2009 (Notice published at 73 FR 56730).
February 28, 2009 (Notice published at 73 FR 60951).
March 23, 2009 (Notice published at 73 FR 60951).
April 14, 2009 (Notice published at 73 FR 63377).
April 14, 2009 (The original Notice, published at 73 FR 40739, set a
compliance date of October 31, 2008. A new Notice, published at 73
FR 64208, delayed compliance until April 14, 2009).
consistency, we are requiring return
addresses on DALs.
DATES: Effective Date: March 2, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Monica Grein at 202–268–8411.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
27, 2008, we published a proposed rule
in the Federal Register (Volume 73,
Number 167, pages 50584–50585),
requiring DALs to be automationcompatible and bear a delivery point
barcode when used with saturation
mailings of Periodicals or Standard Mail
flats.
Except for DALs prepared with
simplified addresses, all DALs
accompanying saturation mailings of
Periodicals or Standard Mail flats must
be automation-compatible and have a
correct delivery point POSTNET
barcode or Intelligent Mail barcode with
an 11-digit routing code. Automationcompatible and barcoded DALs may be
processed in a manner that is more
consistent with today’s operating
environment.
We suggest that mailers work with the
local Postal Service mailpiece design
analyst (MDA) to ensure that all DALs
accompanying saturation mailings of
Periodicals or Standard Mail flats meet
the new standards. Saturation flats
mailings presented with DALs that are
not automation-compatible and
barcoded will not qualify for saturation
prices but may be entered at the basic
carrier route price for Periodicals
mailings or the basic Enhanced Carrier
Route price for Standard Mail mailings.
We received comments from five
respondents on the proposal: two from
a mailer association, two from mailers
that use DALs, and one from a USPS®
postmaster.
Comments
One commenter suggested that to
reduce costs further we should
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
eliminate the use of DALs altogether, or
also apply the automation requirements
to DALs prepared with simplified
addresses. Eliminating the use of DALs
or requiring saturation mailers to
physically apply addresses directly on
each mailpiece may cause undue
hardship for some mailers. We
determined that such a requirement
would be difficult for small local
mailers sending saturation mailings to
rural or highway contract routes and
perhaps cause them to stop using the
mail. We concluded that these
additional changes were not in the best
interest of the Postal Service or our
customers.
One commenter requested DALs be
allowed for Periodicals and Standard
Mail ECR high-density mailings. This
request is outside the scope of this rule.
One commenter expressed concern
about the added cost of preparing an
automation-compatible DAL. We
considered the implications for our
customers, and note that the use of
DALs is an option in most instances. We
continue to encourage customers to
move to on-piece addressing rather than
use DALs. Incidentally, on June 7, 2007,
at the request of many mailers, we
revised our standards to allow
advertising on the front of DALs,
provided that the DALs were barcoded
and automation-compatible (see Postal
Bulletin 22208 and DMM(r) 602.4.2.5.b).
This change provided mailers with the
ability to offset the DAL surcharge,
implemented in May 2007, with new
opportunities for advertising revenue.
One commenter requested we extend
the use of simplified addresses to city
route deliveries. This request is outside
the scope of this final rule.
One commenter expressed concerns
about continuing to enter DALs at
destination delivery units (DDUs) while
remaining eligible for DDU prices for
E:\FR\FM\16JAR1.SGM
16JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 11 / Friday, January 16, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
flats. Although DALS are letter-size,
they are allowed to be entered at DDUs
when they accompany either flats or
parcels. This final rule does not propose
to change the current standards that
allow the DALs to be dropped at the
DDU and does not change price
eligibility for flats.
The Postal Service adopts the
following changes to Mailing Standards
of the United States Postal Service,
Domestic Mail Manual (DMM), which is
incorporated by reference in the Code of
Federal Regulations. See 39 CFR 111.1.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 111
Administrative practice and
procedure, Postal Service.
■ Accordingly, 39 CFR 111 is amended
as follows:
PART 111—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR
Part 111 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101,
401, 403, 404, 414, 416, 3001–3011, 3201–
3219, 3403–3406, 3621, 3622, 3626, 3632,
3633, and 5001.
2. Revise the following sections of
Mailing Standards of the United States
Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual
(DMM), as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
600 Basic Standards for All Mailing
Services
*
*
*
*
*
602
Addressing
1.0
Elements of Addressing
*
*
1.5
Return Addresses
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1.5.3 Required Use of Return
Addresses
The sender’s domestic return address
must appear legibly on:
*
*
*
*
*
[Revise text of 1.5.3 to add new item
m as follows:]
m. Detached addressed labels (DALs).
*
*
*
*
*
Detached Address Labels (DALs)
4.1
DAL Use
*
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
4.0
*
*
*
*
4.1.2 Periodicals or Standard Mail
Flats Saturation Mailings
[Revise text of 4.1.2 to require that
DALs accompanying saturation
mailings of Periodicals or Standard Mail
flats be automation-compatible as
follows:]
Saturation mailings of unaddressed
Periodicals or Standard Mail flats may
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:34 Jan 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
be mailed with detached address labels
(DALs). DALs accompanying saturation
mailings of Periodicals or Standard Mail
flats must be automation-compatible
under 201.3.0. This standard does not
apply to DALs with simplified
addressing. For this standard, saturation
mailing means a mailing sent to at least
75% of the total addresses on a carrier
route or 90% of the residential
addresses on a route, whichever is less.
Deliveries are not required to every
carrier route of a delivery unit.
Saturation flats mailings presented with
DALs that are not automationcompatible and barcoded do not qualify
for saturation prices but may be entered
at the basic carrier route price for
Periodicals mailings or the basic
Enhanced Carrier Route price for
Standard Mail mailings.
*
*
*
*
*
2867
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0261; FRL–8397–9]
Emamectin; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. E9–859 Filed 1–15–09; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes
tolerances for combined residues of
emamectin and its metabolites in or on
tree nuts (crop group 14) and pistachios.
Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.
requested these tolerances under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA). This regulation also makes a
technical correction reinstating hog
tolerances that were inadvertently
omitted from the previous rule.
DATES: This regulation is effective
January 16, 2009. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before March 17, 2009, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2008–0261. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas C. Harris, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 308–9423; e-mail address:
harris.thomas@epa.gov.
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
4.2
Label Preparation
4.2.1
Label Construction
Each DAL must be made of paper or
cardboard stock that is not folded,
perforated, or creased, and that meets
these measurements:
[Revise text of 4.2.1 to modify item c
and add new item d and new item e as
follows:]
*
*
*
*
*
c. At least .007 inch thick except
under 4.2.1.d.
d. If more than 41⁄4 inches high or
more than 6 inches long, must be at
least 0.009 inch thick.
e. Must have an aspect ratio (length
divided by height) from 1.3 to 2.5,
inclusive.
4.2.2
Addressing
[Revise text of 4.2.2 by deleting the
current last sentence in its entirety and
adding a new last sentence to require a
POSTNET or Intelligent Mail barcode
with a delivery point routing code as
follows:]
* * * In addition, if DALs
accompany saturation mailings of
Periodicals or Standard Mail flats, a
correct delivery point POSTNET
barcode or Intelligent Mail barcode with
an 11-digit routing code must be
included (see 708.4) except when using
a simplified address.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JAR1.SGM
16JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 11 (Friday, January 16, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2866-2867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-859]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
New Automation Requirements for Detached Addressed Labels
AGENCY: Postal Service\TM\.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: To make Detached Address Labels (DALs) accompanying saturation
mailings of Periodicals or Standard Mail[reg] flats more compatible
with our processing equipment, they must be automation-compatible and
have a correct delivery point POSTNET(tm) barcode or Intelligent
Mail[reg] barcode with an 11-digit routing code. This requirement does
not apply to DALs with simplified addresses. Also, for consistency, we
are requiring return addresses on DALs.
DATES: Effective Date: March 2, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Monica Grein at 202-268-8411.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 27, 2008, we published a proposed
rule in the Federal Register (Volume 73, Number 167, pages 50584-
50585), requiring DALs to be automation-compatible and bear a delivery
point barcode when used with saturation mailings of Periodicals or
Standard Mail flats.
Except for DALs prepared with simplified addresses, all DALs
accompanying saturation mailings of Periodicals or Standard Mail flats
must be automation-compatible and have a correct delivery point POSTNET
barcode or Intelligent Mail barcode with an 11-digit routing code.
Automation-compatible and barcoded DALs may be processed in a manner
that is more consistent with today's operating environment.
We suggest that mailers work with the local Postal Service
mailpiece design analyst (MDA) to ensure that all DALs accompanying
saturation mailings of Periodicals or Standard Mail flats meet the new
standards. Saturation flats mailings presented with DALs that are not
automation-compatible and barcoded will not qualify for saturation
prices but may be entered at the basic carrier route price for
Periodicals mailings or the basic Enhanced Carrier Route price for
Standard Mail mailings.
We received comments from five respondents on the proposal: two
from a mailer association, two from mailers that use DALs, and one from
a USPS[supreg] postmaster.
Comments
One commenter suggested that to reduce costs further we should
eliminate the use of DALs altogether, or also apply the automation
requirements to DALs prepared with simplified addresses. Eliminating
the use of DALs or requiring saturation mailers to physically apply
addresses directly on each mailpiece may cause undue hardship for some
mailers. We determined that such a requirement would be difficult for
small local mailers sending saturation mailings to rural or highway
contract routes and perhaps cause them to stop using the mail. We
concluded that these additional changes were not in the best interest
of the Postal Service or our customers.
One commenter requested DALs be allowed for Periodicals and
Standard Mail ECR high-density mailings. This request is outside the
scope of this rule.
One commenter expressed concern about the added cost of preparing
an automation-compatible DAL. We considered the implications for our
customers, and note that the use of DALs is an option in most
instances. We continue to encourage customers to move to on-piece
addressing rather than use DALs. Incidentally, on June 7, 2007, at the
request of many mailers, we revised our standards to allow advertising
on the front of DALs, provided that the DALs were barcoded and
automation-compatible (see Postal Bulletin 22208 and DMM(r)
602.4.2.5.b). This change provided mailers with the ability to offset
the DAL surcharge, implemented in May 2007, with new opportunities for
advertising revenue.
One commenter requested we extend the use of simplified addresses
to city route deliveries. This request is outside the scope of this
final rule.
One commenter expressed concerns about continuing to enter DALs at
destination delivery units (DDUs) while remaining eligible for DDU
prices for
[[Page 2867]]
flats. Although DALS are letter-size, they are allowed to be entered at
DDUs when they accompany either flats or parcels. This final rule does
not propose to change the current standards that allow the DALs to be
dropped at the DDU and does not change price eligibility for flats.
The Postal Service adopts the following changes to Mailing
Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual
(DMM), which is incorporated by reference in the Code of Federal
Regulations. See 39 CFR 111.1.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 111
Administrative practice and procedure, Postal Service.
0
Accordingly, 39 CFR 111 is amended as follows:
PART 111--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR Part 111 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 403, 404, 414,
416, 3001-3011, 3201-3219, 3403-3406, 3621, 3622, 3626, 3632, 3633,
and 5001.
2. Revise the following sections of Mailing Standards of the United
States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM), as follows:
* * * * *
600 Basic Standards for All Mailing Services
* * * * *
602 Addressing
1.0 Elements of Addressing
* * * * *
1.5 Return Addresses
* * * * *
1.5.3 Required Use of Return Addresses
The sender's domestic return address must appear legibly on:
* * * * *
[Revise text of 1.5.3 to add new item m as follows:]
m. Detached addressed labels (DALs).
* * * * *
4.0 Detached Address Labels (DALs)
4.1 DAL Use
* * * * *
4.1.2 Periodicals or Standard Mail Flats Saturation Mailings
[Revise text of 4.1.2 to require that DALs accompanying saturation
mailings of Periodicals or Standard Mail flats be automation-compatible
as follows:]
Saturation mailings of unaddressed Periodicals or Standard Mail
flats may be mailed with detached address labels (DALs). DALs
accompanying saturation mailings of Periodicals or Standard Mail flats
must be automation-compatible under 201.3.0. This standard does not
apply to DALs with simplified addressing. For this standard, saturation
mailing means a mailing sent to at least 75% of the total addresses on
a carrier route or 90% of the residential addresses on a route,
whichever is less. Deliveries are not required to every carrier route
of a delivery unit. Saturation flats mailings presented with DALs that
are not automation-compatible and barcoded do not qualify for
saturation prices but may be entered at the basic carrier route price
for Periodicals mailings or the basic Enhanced Carrier Route price for
Standard Mail mailings.
* * * * *
4.2 Label Preparation
4.2.1 Label Construction
Each DAL must be made of paper or cardboard stock that is not
folded, perforated, or creased, and that meets these measurements:
[Revise text of 4.2.1 to modify item c and add new item d and new
item e as follows:]
* * * * *
c. At least .007 inch thick except under 4.2.1.d.
d. If more than 4\1/4\ inches high or more than 6 inches long, must
be at least 0.009 inch thick.
e. Must have an aspect ratio (length divided by height) from 1.3 to
2.5, inclusive.
4.2.2 Addressing
[Revise text of 4.2.2 by deleting the current last sentence in its
entirety and adding a new last sentence to require a POSTNET or
Intelligent Mail barcode with a delivery point routing code as
follows:]
* * * In addition, if DALs accompany saturation mailings of
Periodicals or Standard Mail flats, a correct delivery point POSTNET
barcode or Intelligent Mail barcode with an 11-digit routing code must
be included (see 708.4) except when using a simplified address.
* * * * *
Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. E9-859 Filed 1-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P