Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA): Rule To Simplify and Improve the Process of Obtaining Mortgages and Reduce Consumer Settlement Costs; Deferred Applicability Date for the Revised Definition of “Required Use”, 2369-2370 [E9-852]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 10 / Thursday, January 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
registration information, in writing, to
the Good Clinical Practice Program (HF–
34), Office of Science and Health
Coordination, Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857.
(e) How does an IRB revise its
registration information? If an IRB’s
contact or chair person information
changes, the IRB must revise its
registration information by submitting
any changes in that information within
90 days of the change. An IRB’s decision
to review new types of FDA-regulated
products (such as a decision to review
studies pertaining to food additives
whereas the IRB previously reviewed
studies pertaining to drug products), or
to discontinue reviewing clinical
investigations regulated by FDA is a
change that must be reported within 30
days of the change. An IRB’s decision to
disband is a change that must be
reported within 30 days of permanent
cessation of the IRB’s review of
research. All other information changes
may be reported when the IRB renews
its registration. The revised information
must be sent to FDA either
electronically or in writing in
accordance with paragraph (d) of this
section.
Dated: January 7, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E9–682 Filed 1–14–09; 8:45 am]
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on January 15, 2009.
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lauren Prosnik, Legislation and
Regulations Division, Visa Services,
Department of State, Washington, DC
20520–0106, (202) 663–1202, e-mail
(prosnikla@state.gov).
24 CFR Parts 203 and 3500
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Why is the Department promulgating
this rule?
The Department published an interim
rule, Public Notice 4446 at 68 FR 49353,
Aug. 18, 2003, with a request for
comments. The comment period expired
on October 17, 2003. No public
comments were received during the
comment period.
What did the rule do?
The rule amended the Department’s
regulations at 22 CFR 42.33 to establish
an entirely electronic system utilizing a
specifically designated Internet Web
site, by which aliens can petition for the
opportunity to participate in the
Diversity Visa Program.
Why was the petitioning process
changed?
There are three main benefits to
changing the mail-in process to an
electronic format. First, it helps
eliminate multiple applications,
prohibited under INA Section
204(a)(1)(I). Secondly, it greatly reduces
the cost of administering the system.
Finally, it benefits the petitioners by
immediately notifying them of the
receipt of the petition, impossible under
the mail-in system.
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 42
[Public Notice: 6457]
RIN 1400–AB84
Visas: Documentation of Immigrants
Under the Immigration and Nationality
Act, as Amended: Electronic Petition
for Diversity Immigrant Status
State Department.
Final rule.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This rule makes final an
interim rule published in the Federal
Register on August 18, 2003, amending
the Department’s regulations pertaining
to the manner in which aliens may
petition for the opportunity to
participate in the Diversity Visa
Program. The rule changed the standard
mail-in system previously used to an
entirely electronic system for the
purpose of making the process less
prone to fraud, improve efficiency and
significantly reduce the processing costs
to the Government.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Jan 14, 2009
PART 42—VISAS: DOCUMENTATION
OF IMMIGRANTS UNDER THE
IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY
ACT, AS AMENDED
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 22 CFR part 42 which was
published at 68 FR 49353 on August 18,
2003, is adopted as final without
change.
■
AGENCY:
Jkt 217001
2369
Dated: January 2, 2009.
Janice L. Jacobs,
Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9–698 Filed 1–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[Docket No. FR–5180–F–04]
RIN 2502–AI61
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
(RESPA): Rule To Simplify and
Improve the Process of Obtaining
Mortgages and Reduce Consumer
Settlement Costs; Deferred
Applicability Date for the Revised
Definition of ‘‘Required Use’’
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This final rule delays the
effective date of the definition of
‘‘required use’’ as revised by HUD’s
November 17, 2008, final rule amending
its RESPA regulations. The November
17, 2008, final rule provides that the
revised definition is applicable
commencing January 16, 2009, the
effective date of the final rule. As a
result of recently initiated litigation,
HUD has determined to delay the
effective date of the revised definition of
‘‘Required use’’ until April 16, 2009.
DATES: This correction is effective
January 16, 2009, The definition of
‘‘Required use’’ in § 3500.2, as revised
by HUD’s final rule published on
November 17, 2008, at 73 FR 68204, is
delayed until April 16, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivy
Jackson, Director, or Barton Shapiro,
Deputy Director, Office of RESPA and
Interstate Land Sales, Office of Housing,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street, SW.,
Room 9158, Washington, DC 20410–
8000; telephone 202–708–0502 (this is
not a toll-free telephone number).
Persons with hearing or speech
impairments may access this number
through TTY by calling the toll-free
Federal Information Relay Service at
800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 17, 2008 (73 FR 68204), HUD
published a final rule amending its
regulations to further the purposes of
the Real Estate Settlement Procedures
Act (12 U.S.C. 2601–2617) by requiring
more timely and effective disclosures
related to mortgage settlement costs for
federally related mortgage loans to
consumers. The final rule followed
publication of a March 14, 2008,
proposed rule (73 FR 14030) and made
changes in response to public comment
and in further consideration of certain
issues by HUD. Additional information
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
2370
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 10 / Thursday, January 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
regarding the regulatory amendments,
and the changes made by HUD at the
final rule stage, is provided in the
preamble to the November 17, 2008,
final rule.
The effective date of the November
17, 2008, final rule is January 16, 2009.
However, the final rule provides for an
appropriate transition period for certain
requirements. Other provisions are to be
implemented upon the effective date of
the final rule.
Among those regulatory changes to be
implemented upon the effective date of
January 16, 2009, is the revised
definition of the term ‘‘Required use.’’
This amendment has become the subject
of recently initiated litigation. (National
Association of Home Builders, et al. v.
Steve Preston, et al., Civ. Action No. 08–
CV–1324, United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Virginia,
Alexandria Division.) For reasons
related to the proper litigation of this
case, HUD is issuing this final rule to
delay the effective date of the revised
definition of ‘‘Required use’’ for an
additional 90 days until April 16, 2009.
In general, HUD publishes a rule for
public comment before issuing a rule for
effect, in accordance with its own
regulations on rulemaking at 24 CFR
part 10. Part 10, however, does provide
in § 10.1 for exceptions from that
general rule where HUD finds good
cause to omit advance notice and public
participation. The Department finds that
good cause exists to publish this final
rule for effect without first soliciting
public comment as public comment is
impracticable, given the litigation
schedule established by the court.
■ Accordingly, HUD’s final rule
published on November 17, 2008 at 73
FR 68204 (Docket No. FR 5180–F–03,
FR Doc. E8–27070) is corrected as
follows:
■ 1. On page 68239, beginning in the
first column, § 3500.1(b)(1) is corrected
to read as follows:
§ 3500.1
Designation and applicability.
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) The definition of Required use
in§ 3500.2 is applicable commencing on
April 16, 2009; §§ 3500.8(b), 3500.17,
3500.21, 3500.22 and 3500.23, and
Appendices E and MS–1 are applicable
commencing January 16, 2009.
*
*
*
*
*
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
*
Dated: January 9, 2009.
Brian D. Montgomery,
Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal
Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. E9–852 Filed 1–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Jan 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[TD 9443]
RIN 1545–BG16
Postponement of Certain Tax-Related
Deadlines by Reason of a Federally
Declared Disaster or Terroristic or
Military Action
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulation.
SUMMARY: This document contains final
regulations relating to postponement of
certain tax-related deadlines either due
to service in a combat zone or due to a
federally declared disaster. The
regulations reflect changes in the law
made by the Victims of Terrorism Tax
Relief Act of 2001, the Tax Extenders
and Alternative Minimum Tax Relief
Act of 2008 (TEAMTRA), and current
IRS practice. The regulations affect
taxpayers serving in a combat zone and
taxpayers affected by a federally
declared disaster.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective on January 15, 2009.
Applicability Dates: For dates of
applicability, see § 301.7508A–1(g).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Ellen Keys, (202) 622–4570 (not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains amendments
to the Procedure and Administration
Regulations (26 CFR part 301). Section
7508A of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code) relates to the postponement of
certain tax-related acts by reason of a
federally declared disaster or terroristic
or military action. Section 7508A was
added by section 911(a) of the Taxpayer
Relief Act of 1997, Public Law 105–34
(111 Stat. 788, 877–78 (1997)) (the 1997
Act), which was effective for any period
for performing an act that had not
expired before December 5, 1997.
A notice of proposed rulemaking
(REG–142680–06) was published in the
Federal Register (73 FR 40471–01) on
July 15, 2008. No comments were
received from the public in response to
the notice of proposed rulemaking, and
no public hearing was requested or
held. In this Treasury decision, the
proposed regulations are adopted as
revised.
Explanation of Revisions
Section 301.7508A–1 of these final
regulations is revised throughout to use
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the term ‘‘federally declared disaster’’
instead of the term ‘‘Presidentially
declared disaster’’ when referring to any
disaster determined by the President of
the United States to warrant assistance
by the Federal Government under the
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C.
5121, et seq. (the ‘‘Stafford Act’’). Prior
versions of these regulations and the
proposed regulations included the term
‘‘Presidentially declared disaster’’ as
defined in former Code section
1033(h)(3). Sec. 706(a) of TEAMTRA,
Div. C of Public Law 110–343 (122 Stat.
3765, 3920), amended Code section
1033(h)(3) by replacing the term
‘‘Presidentially declared disaster’’ with
‘‘federally declared disaster’’ and
providing that the term shall have the
meaning given such term by section
165(h)(3)(C). Section 165(h)(3)(C), added
by section 706(a) of TEAMTRA, defines
the term ‘‘federally declared disaster’’ to
mean any disaster subsequently
determined by the President of the
United States to warrant assistance by
the Federal Government under the
Stafford Act. This definition is
substantially the same as the definition
of ‘‘Presidentially declared disaster’’
under former section 1033(h)(C). Thus,
these statutory changes in terminology
do not materially impact the meaning of
either the proposed or final regulations.
Section 301.7508A–1(d)(1) of the final
regulations is revised to expand the
definition of ‘‘affected taxpayer’’ to
include any individual, business entity,
or sole proprietorship not located in a
covered disaster area, but whose records
necessary to meet a deadline for an act
specified in paragraph (c) of
§ 301.7508A–1 are located in the
covered disaster area. Section
301.7508A–1(d)(1) of the final
regulations further expands the
definition of affected taxpayer to
include any individual visiting the
covered disaster area who was killed or
injured as a result of the disaster. These
changes reflect current IRS practice of
broadly defining the term ‘‘affected
taxpayer.’’
Section 301.7508A–1(f) of the final
regulations is revised to include a new
Example 9. Example 9, which reflects
current IRS practice, explains the
impact of disaster relief on installment
agreement payments that become due
during the postponement period.
Example 9 explains that the affected
taxpayer’s obligation to make
installment agreement payments is
suspended during the postponement
period. Example 9 further explains that,
because installment agreement
payments pertain to pre-existing tax
liabilities, interest and penalties
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 10 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2369-2370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-852]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Parts 203 and 3500
[Docket No. FR-5180-F-04]
RIN 2502-AI61
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA): Rule To Simplify
and Improve the Process of Obtaining Mortgages and Reduce Consumer
Settlement Costs; Deferred Applicability Date for the Revised
Definition of ``Required Use''
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule delays the effective date of the definition of
``required use'' as revised by HUD's November 17, 2008, final rule
amending its RESPA regulations. The November 17, 2008, final rule
provides that the revised definition is applicable commencing January
16, 2009, the effective date of the final rule. As a result of recently
initiated litigation, HUD has determined to delay the effective date of
the revised definition of ``Required use'' until April 16, 2009.
DATES: This correction is effective January 16, 2009, The definition of
``Required use'' in Sec. 3500.2, as revised by HUD's final rule
published on November 17, 2008, at 73 FR 68204, is delayed until April
16, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivy Jackson, Director, or Barton
Shapiro, Deputy Director, Office of RESPA and Interstate Land Sales,
Office of Housing, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th
Street, SW., Room 9158, Washington, DC 20410-8000; telephone 202-708-
0502 (this is not a toll-free telephone number). Persons with hearing
or speech impairments may access this number through TTY by calling the
toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at 800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 17, 2008 (73 FR 68204), HUD
published a final rule amending its regulations to further the purposes
of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (12 U.S.C. 2601-2617) by
requiring more timely and effective disclosures related to mortgage
settlement costs for federally related mortgage loans to consumers. The
final rule followed publication of a March 14, 2008, proposed rule (73
FR 14030) and made changes in response to public comment and in further
consideration of certain issues by HUD. Additional information
[[Page 2370]]
regarding the regulatory amendments, and the changes made by HUD at the
final rule stage, is provided in the preamble to the November 17, 2008,
final rule.
The effective date of the November 17, 2008, final rule is January
16, 2009. However, the final rule provides for an appropriate
transition period for certain requirements. Other provisions are to be
implemented upon the effective date of the final rule.
Among those regulatory changes to be implemented upon the effective
date of January 16, 2009, is the revised definition of the term
``Required use.'' This amendment has become the subject of recently
initiated litigation. (National Association of Home Builders, et al. v.
Steve Preston, et al., Civ. Action No. 08-CV-1324, United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria
Division.) For reasons related to the proper litigation of this case,
HUD is issuing this final rule to delay the effective date of the
revised definition of ``Required use'' for an additional 90 days until
April 16, 2009.
In general, HUD publishes a rule for public comment before issuing
a rule for effect, in accordance with its own regulations on rulemaking
at 24 CFR part 10. Part 10, however, does provide in Sec. 10.1 for
exceptions from that general rule where HUD finds good cause to omit
advance notice and public participation. The Department finds that good
cause exists to publish this final rule for effect without first
soliciting public comment as public comment is impracticable, given the
litigation schedule established by the court.
0
Accordingly, HUD's final rule published on November 17, 2008 at 73 FR
68204 (Docket No. FR 5180-F-03, FR Doc. E8-27070) is corrected as
follows:
0
1. On page 68239, beginning in the first column, Sec. 3500.1(b)(1) is
corrected to read as follows:
Sec. 3500.1 Designation and applicability.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) The definition of Required use inSec. 3500.2 is applicable
commencing on April 16, 2009; Sec. Sec. 3500.8(b), 3500.17, 3500.21,
3500.22 and 3500.23, and Appendices E and MS-1 are applicable
commencing January 16, 2009.
* * * * *
Dated: January 9, 2009.
Brian D. Montgomery,
Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. E9-852 Filed 1-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P