Visas: Documentation of Immigrants Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended: Electronic Petition for Diversity Immigrant Status, 2369 [E9-698]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 10 / Thursday, January 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
registration information, in writing, to
the Good Clinical Practice Program (HF–
34), Office of Science and Health
Coordination, Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857.
(e) How does an IRB revise its
registration information? If an IRB’s
contact or chair person information
changes, the IRB must revise its
registration information by submitting
any changes in that information within
90 days of the change. An IRB’s decision
to review new types of FDA-regulated
products (such as a decision to review
studies pertaining to food additives
whereas the IRB previously reviewed
studies pertaining to drug products), or
to discontinue reviewing clinical
investigations regulated by FDA is a
change that must be reported within 30
days of the change. An IRB’s decision to
disband is a change that must be
reported within 30 days of permanent
cessation of the IRB’s review of
research. All other information changes
may be reported when the IRB renews
its registration. The revised information
must be sent to FDA either
electronically or in writing in
accordance with paragraph (d) of this
section.
Dated: January 7, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E9–682 Filed 1–14–09; 8:45 am]
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on January 15, 2009.
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lauren Prosnik, Legislation and
Regulations Division, Visa Services,
Department of State, Washington, DC
20520–0106, (202) 663–1202, e-mail
(prosnikla@state.gov).
24 CFR Parts 203 and 3500
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Why is the Department promulgating
this rule?
The Department published an interim
rule, Public Notice 4446 at 68 FR 49353,
Aug. 18, 2003, with a request for
comments. The comment period expired
on October 17, 2003. No public
comments were received during the
comment period.
What did the rule do?
The rule amended the Department’s
regulations at 22 CFR 42.33 to establish
an entirely electronic system utilizing a
specifically designated Internet Web
site, by which aliens can petition for the
opportunity to participate in the
Diversity Visa Program.
Why was the petitioning process
changed?
There are three main benefits to
changing the mail-in process to an
electronic format. First, it helps
eliminate multiple applications,
prohibited under INA Section
204(a)(1)(I). Secondly, it greatly reduces
the cost of administering the system.
Finally, it benefits the petitioners by
immediately notifying them of the
receipt of the petition, impossible under
the mail-in system.
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 42
[Public Notice: 6457]
RIN 1400–AB84
Visas: Documentation of Immigrants
Under the Immigration and Nationality
Act, as Amended: Electronic Petition
for Diversity Immigrant Status
State Department.
Final rule.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This rule makes final an
interim rule published in the Federal
Register on August 18, 2003, amending
the Department’s regulations pertaining
to the manner in which aliens may
petition for the opportunity to
participate in the Diversity Visa
Program. The rule changed the standard
mail-in system previously used to an
entirely electronic system for the
purpose of making the process less
prone to fraud, improve efficiency and
significantly reduce the processing costs
to the Government.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Jan 14, 2009
PART 42—VISAS: DOCUMENTATION
OF IMMIGRANTS UNDER THE
IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY
ACT, AS AMENDED
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 22 CFR part 42 which was
published at 68 FR 49353 on August 18,
2003, is adopted as final without
change.
■
AGENCY:
Jkt 217001
2369
Dated: January 2, 2009.
Janice L. Jacobs,
Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9–698 Filed 1–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[Docket No. FR–5180–F–04]
RIN 2502–AI61
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
(RESPA): Rule To Simplify and
Improve the Process of Obtaining
Mortgages and Reduce Consumer
Settlement Costs; Deferred
Applicability Date for the Revised
Definition of ‘‘Required Use’’
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This final rule delays the
effective date of the definition of
‘‘required use’’ as revised by HUD’s
November 17, 2008, final rule amending
its RESPA regulations. The November
17, 2008, final rule provides that the
revised definition is applicable
commencing January 16, 2009, the
effective date of the final rule. As a
result of recently initiated litigation,
HUD has determined to delay the
effective date of the revised definition of
‘‘Required use’’ until April 16, 2009.
DATES: This correction is effective
January 16, 2009, The definition of
‘‘Required use’’ in § 3500.2, as revised
by HUD’s final rule published on
November 17, 2008, at 73 FR 68204, is
delayed until April 16, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivy
Jackson, Director, or Barton Shapiro,
Deputy Director, Office of RESPA and
Interstate Land Sales, Office of Housing,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street, SW.,
Room 9158, Washington, DC 20410–
8000; telephone 202–708–0502 (this is
not a toll-free telephone number).
Persons with hearing or speech
impairments may access this number
through TTY by calling the toll-free
Federal Information Relay Service at
800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 17, 2008 (73 FR 68204), HUD
published a final rule amending its
regulations to further the purposes of
the Real Estate Settlement Procedures
Act (12 U.S.C. 2601–2617) by requiring
more timely and effective disclosures
related to mortgage settlement costs for
federally related mortgage loans to
consumers. The final rule followed
publication of a March 14, 2008,
proposed rule (73 FR 14030) and made
changes in response to public comment
and in further consideration of certain
issues by HUD. Additional information
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 10 (Thursday, January 15, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 2369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-698]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 42
[Public Notice: 6457]
RIN 1400-AB84
Visas: Documentation of Immigrants Under the Immigration and
Nationality Act, as Amended: Electronic Petition for Diversity
Immigrant Status
AGENCY: State Department.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule makes final an interim rule published in the Federal
Register on August 18, 2003, amending the Department's regulations
pertaining to the manner in which aliens may petition for the
opportunity to participate in the Diversity Visa Program. The rule
changed the standard mail-in system previously used to an entirely
electronic system for the purpose of making the process less prone to
fraud, improve efficiency and significantly reduce the processing costs
to the Government.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on January 15, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lauren Prosnik, Legislation and
Regulations Division, Visa Services, Department of State, Washington,
DC 20520-0106, (202) 663-1202, e-mail (prosnikla@state.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Why is the Department promulgating this rule?
The Department published an interim rule, Public Notice 4446 at 68
FR 49353, Aug. 18, 2003, with a request for comments. The comment
period expired on October 17, 2003. No public comments were received
during the comment period.
What did the rule do?
The rule amended the Department's regulations at 22 CFR 42.33 to
establish an entirely electronic system utilizing a specifically
designated Internet Web site, by which aliens can petition for the
opportunity to participate in the Diversity Visa Program.
Why was the petitioning process changed?
There are three main benefits to changing the mail-in process to an
electronic format. First, it helps eliminate multiple applications,
prohibited under INA Section 204(a)(1)(I). Secondly, it greatly reduces
the cost of administering the system. Finally, it benefits the
petitioners by immediately notifying them of the receipt of the
petition, impossible under the mail-in system.
PART 42--VISAS: DOCUMENTATION OF IMMIGRANTS UNDER THE IMMIGRATION
AND NATIONALITY ACT, AS AMENDED
0
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 22 CFR part 42 which was
published at 68 FR 49353 on August 18, 2003, is adopted as final
without change.
Dated: January 2, 2009.
Janice L. Jacobs,
Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-698 Filed 1-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P