Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of Certain Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas, 1948-1954 [E9-528]

Download as PDF 1948 Proposed Rules Federal Register Vol. 74, No. 9 Wednesday, January 14, 2009 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 5 CFR Part 532 RIN 3206–AL77 Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of Certain Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management. ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments. SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a proposed rule that would redefine the geographic boundaries of several appropriated fund Federal Wage System wage areas for pay-setting purposes. Based on recent reviews of Metropolitan Statistical Area boundaries in a number of wage areas, OPM proposes redefinitions affecting the following wage areas: Birmingham, AL; Denver, CO; Wilmington, DE; Washington, DC; Atlanta, GA; Columbus, GA; Macon, GA; Chicago, IL; Bloomington-BedfordWashington, IN; Indianapolis, IN; Louisville, KY; Baltimore, MD; Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD; St. Louis, MO; Southern Missouri; Omaha, NE; New York, NY; Philadelphia, PA; Scranton-WilkesBarre, PA; Eastern South Dakota; Richmond, VA; and Milwaukee, WI. DATES: We must receive comments on or before February 13, 2009. ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to Charles D. Grimes III, Deputy Associate Director for Performance and Pay Systems, Strategic Human Resources Policy Division, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Room 7H31, 1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415–8200; e-mail pay-performancepolicy@opm.gov; or FAX: (202) 606– 4264. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Gonzalez, (202) 606–2838; email pay-performance-policy@opm.gov; or FAX: (202) 606–4264. VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:42 Jan 13, 2009 Jkt 217001 The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a proposed rule to redefine the geographic boundaries of several appropriated fund Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas. These changes are based on recommendations of the Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee (FPRAC), the statutory national labor-management committee responsible for advising OPM on matters affecting the pay of FWS employees. From time to time, FPRAC reviews the boundaries of wage areas and provides OPM with recommendations for changes if the Committee finds that changes are warranted. There are currently 132 FWS wage areas in the United States and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico for bluecollar employees who are paid from appropriated funds. Each wage area is comprised of a survey area where a lead agency, the Department of Defense, measures local prevailing wage levels in a local labor market. Because it is not feasible to include every part of the United States in a survey area, those parts that are not in a survey area are combined with a nearby survey area to form a wage area’s area of application. OPM considers the following regulatory criteria under 5 CFR 532.211 when defining FWS wage area boundaries: 1. Distance, transportation facilities, and geographic features; 2. Commuting patterns; and 3. Similarities in overall population, employment, and the kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments. In addition, OPM regulations at 5 CFR 532.211 do not permit splitting Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) for the purpose of defining a wage area, except in very unusual circumstances (e.g., organizational relationships among closely located Federal activities). The Office of Management and Budget defines MSAs and maintains and updates the definitions of MSA boundaries following each decennial census. MSAs are composed of counties and are defined on the basis of a central urbanized area-a contiguous area of relatively high population density. Additional surrounding counties are included in MSAs if they have strong social and economic ties to central counties. When the boundaries of wage areas were first established in the 1960s, there SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 were fewer MSAs than there are today and the boundaries of the then existing MSAs were much smaller. Most MSAs were contained within the boundaries of a wage area. MSAs have expanded each decade and in some cases now extend beyond the boundaries of the wage area. FPRAC recently reviewed several wage areas where boundaries subdivide certain MSAs and concurred by consensus with the changes described in this proposed rule. These changes would be effective on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after 30 days following publication of the final regulations. FPRAC recommended no other changes in the geographic definitions of the wage areas. Birmingham-Hoover, AL MSA: Bibb, Blount, Chilton, Jefferson, St. Clair, Shelby, and Walker Counties, AL, comprise the Birmingham-Hoover, AL MSA. Jefferson, St. Clair, Shelby, and Walker Counties are part of the Birmingham survey area, Bibb and Blount Counties are part of the Birmingham area of application, and Chilton County is part of the Columbus area of application. OPM proposes to redefine Chilton County to the Birmingham area of application so that the entire Birmingham-Hoover, AL MSA is in one wage area. There are currently no FWS employees working in Chilton County. Denver-Aurora, CO MSA: Adams, Arapahoe, Broomfield, Clear Creek, Denver, Douglas, Elbert, Gilpin, Jefferson, and Park Counties, CO, comprise the Denver-Aurora, CO MSA. Adams, Arapahoe, Denver, Douglas, Gilpin, and Jefferson Counties are part of the Denver, CO, survey area and Clear Creek, Elbert, and Park are part of the Denver area of application. Broomfield County is currently undefined. The municipality of Broomfield was incorporated in 1961 in the southeastern corner of Boulder County, CO. On November 15, 2001, Broomfield County officially separated from Boulder County and became the 64th county of Colorado. The boundaries of the City of Broomfield and the County of Broomfield are identical. OPM proposes to define Broomfield County as part of the Denver survey area. There are three FWS employees working in Broomfield County. Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-MD-VA-WV MSA: Washington, DC; Calvert, Charles, Frederick, E:\FR\FM\14JAP1.SGM 14JAP1 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2009 / Proposed Rules Montgomery, and Prince George’s Counties, MD; Arlington, Clarke, Fairfax, Fauquier, Loudoun, Prince William, Spotsylvania, Stafford, and Warren Counties, VA; Alexandria, Fairfax, Falls Church, Fredericksburg, Manassas, and Manassas Park Cities, VA; and Jefferson County, WV, comprise the Washington-ArlingtonAlexandria, DC-MD-VA-WV MSA. Washington, DC; Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince George’s Counties, MD; Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, and Prince William Counties, VA; and Alexandria, Fairfax, Falls Church, Manassas, and Manassas Park Cities, VA; are part of the Washington survey area. Calvert and St. Mary’s Counties, MD, and Fauquier, King George, and Stafford Counties, VA, are part of the Washington area of application. Spotsylvania County and Fredericksburg City, VA, are part of the Richmond area of application. Clarke and Warren Counties, VA, and Jefferson County, WV, are part of the HagerstownMartinsburg-Chambersburg area of application. OPM proposes to redefine Clarke, Spotsylvania, and Warren Counties, VA, Fredericksburg City, VA, and Jefferson County, WV, to the Washington area of application so that the entire Washington-ArlingtonAlexandria, DC-MD-VA-WV MSA is in one wage area. There are no FWS employees working in Clarke and Spotsylvania Counties, but there are 31 FWS employees working in Warren County, 9 FWS employees working in Fredericksburg City, and 50 FWS employees working in Jefferson County. Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA MSA: Barlow, Barrow, Butts, Carroll, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, Dawson, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Haralson, Heard, Henry, Jasper, Lamar, Meriwether, Newton, Paulding, Pickens, Pike, Rockdale, Spalding, and Walton Counties, GA, comprise the AtlantaSandy Springs-Marietta, GA MSA. Butts, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Newton, Paulding, Rockdale, and Walton Counties are part of the Atlanta survey area; Bartow, Barrow, Carroll, Coweta, Dawson, Haralson, Heard, Pickens, Pike, and Spalding Counties are part of the Atlanta area of application; Jasper and Lamar Counties are part of the Macon area of application; and Meriwether County is part of the Columbus area of application. OPM proposes to redefine Jasper, Lamar, and Meriwether Counties to the Atlanta area of application so that the entire Atlanta-Sandy SpringsMarietta, GA MSA is in one wage area. VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:42 Jan 13, 2009 Jkt 217001 There are no FWS employees working in Jasper and Lamar Counties, but there is one FWS employee working in Meriwether County. Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI MSA: Cook, DeKalb, DuPage, Grundy, Kane, Kendall, McHenry, and Will Counties, IL; Jasper, Lake, Newton, and Porter Counties, IN; and Lake and Kenosha Counties, WI, comprise the Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI MSA. Cook, DuPage, Kane, McHenry, and Will Counties, IL, and Lake County, WI, are part of the Chicago survey area; DeKalb, Grundy, and Kendall, IL, and Jasper, Lake, Newton, and Porter Counties, IN, are part of the Chicago area of application; and Kenosha County, WI, is part of the Milwaukee area of application. OPM proposes to redefine Kenosha County to the Chicago area of application so that the entire Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI MSA is in one wage area. There are six FWS employees working in Kenosha County. Indianapolis, IN MSA: Boone, Brown, Hamilton, Hancock, Hendricks, Johnson, Marion, Morgan, Putnam, and Shelby Counties, IN, comprise the Indianapolis, IN MSA. Boone, Hamilton, Hancock, Hendricks, Johnson, Marion, Morgan, and Shelby Counties are part of the Indianapolis survey area; Putnam County is part of the Indianapolis area of application; and Brown County is part of the Bloomington-BedfordWashington area of application. OPM proposes to redefine Brown County to the Indianapolis area of application so that the entire Indianapolis, IN MSA is in one wage area. There are no FWS employees working in Brown County. Sioux City, IA-NE-SD MSA: Woodbury County, IA, Dakota and Dixon Counties, NE, and Union County, SD, comprise the Sioux City, IA-NE-SD MSA. Woodbury County, IA, and Dakota and Dixon Counties, NE, are part of the Omaha area of application and Union County, SD, is part of the Eastern South Dakota area of application. OPM proposes to redefine Union County to the Omaha area of application so that the entire Sioux City, IA-NE-SD MSA is in one wage area. There are no FWS employees working in Union County. Louisville, KY-IN MSA: Clark, Floyd, Harrison, and Washington County, IN, and Bullitt, Henry, Jefferson, Meade, Nelson, Oldham, Shelby, Spencer, and Trimble Counties, KY, comprise the Louisville, KY-IN MSA. Clark, and Floyd Counties, IN, and Bullitt, Jefferson, and Oldham Counties, KY, are part of the Louisville survey area; Harrison County, IN, and Henry, Meade, Nelson, Shelby, Spencer, and Trimble Counties, KY, are part of the Louisville PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 1949 area of application; and Washington County, IN, is part of the BloomingtonBedford-Washington area of application. OPM proposes to redefine Washington County to the Louisville area of application so that the entire Louisville, KY-IN MSA is in one wage area. There are no FWS employees working in Washington County. Baltimore-Towson, MD MSA: Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, Howard, and Queen Anne’s Counties, MD, and Baltimore City, MD, comprise the Baltimore-Towson, MD MSA. Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, and Howard Counties and Baltimore City are part of the Baltimore survey area and Queen Anne’s County is part of the Wilmington area of application. OPM proposes to redefine Queen Anne’s County to the Baltimore area of application so that the entire BaltimoreTowson, MD MSA is in one wage area. There are no FWS employees working in Queen Anne’s County. Jefferson City, MO MSA: Callaway, Cole, Moniteau, and Osage Counties, MO, comprise the Jefferson City, MO MSA. Callaway, Cole, and Osage Counties are part of the St. Louis area of application and Moniteau County is part of the Southern Missouri area of application. OPM proposes to redefine Moniteau County to the St. Louis area of application so that the entire Jefferson City, MO MSA is in one wage area. There are no FWS employees working in Moniteau County. New York-Newark-Edison, NY-NJ-PA MSA: Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Hunterdon, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Somerset, Sussex, and Union Counties, NJ; Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Putnam, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk, and Westchester Counties, NY; and Pike County, PA, comprise the New YorkNewark-Edison, NY-NJ-PA MSA. Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Middlesex, Morris, Passaic, Somerset, and Union Counties, NJ, and Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Queens, Suffolk, and Westchester Counties, NY, are part of the New York survey area. Monmouth, Ocean (excluding the Fort Dix Military Reservation), and Sussex Counties, NJ, and Putnam, Richmond, and Rockland Counties, NY, are part of the New York area of application. Hunterdon County, NJ, is part of the Philadelphia area of application and Pike County, PA, is part of the Scranton-Wilkes-Barre area of application. OPM proposes to redefine Hunterdon County, NJ, and Pike County, PA, to the New York area of application so that the entire New YorkNewark-Edison, NY-NJ-PA MSA is in one wage area. There are no FWS employees working in Hunterdon E:\FR\FM\14JAP1.SGM 14JAP1 1950 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2009 / Proposed Rules County, but there are five FWS employees working in Pike County. Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ MSA: Warren County, NJ, and Carbon, Lehigh, and Northampton Counties, PA, comprise the Allentown-BethlehemEaston, PA-NJ MSA. Warren County, NJ, and Lehigh and Northampton Counties, PA are part of the Philadelphia area of application and Carbon County, PA, is part of the Scranton-Wilkes-Barre area of application. OPM proposes to redefine Carbon County to the Philadelphia area of application so that the entire Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ MSA is in one wage area. There are three FWS employees working in Carbon County. Regulatory Flexibility Act I certify that these regulations would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they would affect only Federal agencies and employees. List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532 Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages. U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Michael W. Hager, Acting Director. Accordingly, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management is proposing to amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows: PART 532—PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS 1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS 2. Appendix C to subpart B is amended by revising the wage area listings for Birmingham, AL; Denver, CO; Wilmington, DE; Washington, DC; Atlanta, GA; Columbus, GA; Macon, GA; Chicago, IL; Bloomington-BedfordWashington, IN; Indianapolis, IN; Louisville, KY; Baltimore, MD; Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD; St. Louis, MO; Southern Missouri; Omaha, NE; New York, NY; Philadelphia, PA; Scranton-WilkesBarre, PA; Eastern South Dakota; Richmond, VA; and Milwaukee, WI, to read as follows: APPENDIX C TO SUBPART B OF PART 532—APPROPRIATED FUND WAGE AND SURVEY AREAS * * * * * * * * ALABAMA * * VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:42 Jan 13, 2009 Jkt 217001 Birmingham Survey Area Alabama: Jefferson St. Clair Shelby Tuscaloosa Walker Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Alabama: Bibb Blount Chilton Cullman Fayette Greene Hale Lamar Marengo Perry Pickens * * * * * COLORADO Denver Survey Area Colorado: Adams Arapahoe Boulder Broomfield Denver Douglas Gilpin Jefferson Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Colorado: Clear Creek Eagle Elbert Garfield Grand Jackson Lake Larimer Logan Morgan Park Phillips Pitkin Rio Blanco Routt Sedgwick Summit Washington Weld Yuma * * * * * DELAWARE Wilmington Survey Area Delaware: Kent New Castle Maryland: Cecil New Jersey: Salem Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Delaware: PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Sussex Maryland: Caroline Dorchester Kent Somerset Talbot Wicomico Worcester (Does not include the Assateague Island portion.) * * * * * DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Washington, DC Survey Area District of Columbia: Washington, DC Maryland: Charles Frederick Montgomery Prince George’s Virginia (cities): Alexandria Fairfax Falls Church Manassas Manassas Park Virginia (counties): Arlington Fairfax Loudoun Prince William Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Maryland: Calvert St. Mary’s Virginia (city): Fredericksburg Virginia (counties): Clarke Fauquier King George Spotsylvania Stafford Warren West Virginia: Jefferson * * * * * * * * GEORGIA * * Atlanta Survey Area Georgia: Butts Cherokee Clayton Cobb De Kalb Douglas Fayette Forsyth Fulton Gwinnett Henry Newton Paulding Rockdale Walton Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Georgia: E:\FR\FM\14JAP1.SGM 14JAP1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2009 / Proposed Rules Macon * * * INDIANA Survey Area Banks Barrow Bartow Carroll Chattooga Clarke Coweta Dawson Fannin Floyd Franklin Gilmer Gordon Greene Habersham Hall Haralson Heard Jackson Jasper Lamar Lumpkin Madison Meriwether Morgan Murray Oconee Oglethorpe Pickens Pike Polk Rabun Spalding Stephens Towns Union White Whitfield Bloomington-Bedford-Washington Survey Area Indiana: Daviess Greene Knox Lawrence Martin Monroe Orange Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Indiana: Crawford Dubois Gibson Jackson Owen Perry Pike Posey Spencer Vanderburgh Warrick Illinois: Edwards Gallatin Hardin Lawrence Richland Wabash White Kentucky: Crittenden Daviess Hancock Henderson Livingston McLean Ohio Union Webster Georgia: Bibb Houston Jones Laurens Twiggs Wilkinson Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Georgia: Baldwin Bleckley Crawford Crisp Dodge Dooly Hancock Johnson Macon Monroe Montgomery Peach Pulaski Putnam Telfair Treutlen Upson Washington Wheeler Wilcox * * * * * * * ILLINOIS * * * * Chicago Columbus Survey Area Survey Area sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS * Illinois: Cook Du Page Kane Lake McHenry Will Georgia (counties): Chattahoochee Georgia (consolidated government): Columbus Alabama: Autauga Elmore Lee Macon Montgomery Russell Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Georgia: Harris Marion Quitman Schley Stewart Talbot Taylor Webster Alabama: Bullock Butler Chambers Coosa Crenshaw Dallas Lowndes Pike Tallapoosa Wilcox VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:42 Jan 13, 2009 Jkt 217001 * Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Illinois: Boone De Kalb Grundy Iroquois Kankakee Kendall La Salle Lee Livingston Ogle Stephenson Winnebago Indiana: Benton Jasper Lake La Porte Newton Porter Pulaski Starke Wisconsin: Kenosha PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 * * * * Indianapolis Survey Area Indiana: Boone Hamilton Hancock Hendricks Johnson Marion Morgan Shelby Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Indiana: Bartholomew Brown Clay Clinton Decatur Delaware Fayette Fountain Henry Madison Montgomery Parke Putnam Rush Sullivan Tippecanoe E:\FR\FM\14JAP1.SGM 14JAP1 1951 1952 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2009 / Proposed Rules Tipton Vermillion Vigo Warren * * * * * * * * KENTUCKY * * Louisville Survey Area Kentucky: Bullitt Hardin Jefferson Oldham Indiana: Clark Floyd Jefferson Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Kentucky: Breckinridge Grayson Hart Henry Larue Meade Nelson Shelby Spencer Trimble Indiana: Harrison Jennings Scott Washington * * * * * * * MARYLAND * * * sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS Baltimore Survey Area Maryland: Baltimore City Anne Arundel Baltimore Carroll Harford Howard Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Maryland: Queen Anne’s Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg Survey Area Maryland: Washington Pennsylvania: Franklin West Virginia: Berkeley Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Maryland: Allegany Garrett Pennsylvania: Fulton Virginia (cities): Harrisonburg Winchester Virginia (counties): VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:42 Jan 13, 2009 Jkt 217001 Perry Pike Pope Pulaski Randolph Saline Scott Union Washington Wayne Williamson Culpeper Frederick Greene Madison Page Rappahannock Rockingham Shenandoah West Virginia: Hampshire Hardy Mineral Morgan * * * * * MISSOURI St. Louis Survey Area Missouri: St. Louis City Franklin Jefferson St. Charles St. Louis Illinois: Clinton Madison Monroe St. Clair Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Missouri: Audrain Boone Callaway Clark Cole Crawford Gasconade Knox Lewis Lincoln Marion Moniteau Monroe Montgomery Osage Pike Ralls Randolph St. Francois Ste. Genevieve Scotland Shelby Warren Washington Illinois: Alexander Bond Calhoun Clay Effingham Fayette Franklin Greene Hamilton Jackson Jefferson Jersey Johnson Macoupin Marion Massac Montgomery Morgan PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Southern Missouri Survey Area Missouri: Christian Greene Laclede Phelps Pulaski Webster Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Missouri: Barry Barton Benton Bollinger Butler Camden Cape Girardeau Carter Cedar Dade Dallas Dent Douglas Hickory Howell Iron Jasper Lawrence McDonald Madison Maries Miller Mississippi Morgan New Madrid Newton Oregon Ozark Perry Polk Reynolds Ripley St. Clair Scott Shannon Stoddard Stone Taney Texas Vernon Wayne Wright Kansas: Cherokee Crawford * * * NEBRASKA Omaha Survey Area Nebraska: E:\FR\FM\14JAP1.SGM 14JAP1 * * sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2009 / Proposed Rules Douglas Lancaster Sarpy Iowa: Pottawattamie Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Nebraska: Adams Antelope Arthur Blaine Boone Boyd Brown Buffalo Burt Butler Cass Cedar Chase Cherry Clay Colfax Cuming Custer Dakota Dawson Dixon Dodge Dundy Fillmore Franklin Frontier Furnas Gage Garfield Gosper Grant Greeley Hall Hamilton Harlan Hayes Hitchcock Holt Hooker Howard Jefferson Johnson Kearney Keith Keya Paha Knox Lincoln Logan Loup McPherson Madison Merrick Nance Nemaha Nuckolls Otoe Pawnee Perkins Phelps Pierce Platte Polk Red Willow Richardson Rock Saline Saunders Seward Sherman VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:42 Jan 13, 2009 Jkt 217001 PENNSYLVANIA Stanton Thayer Thomas Thurston Valley Washington Wayne Webster Wheeler York Iowa: Adams Audubon Buena Vista Cass Cherokee Clay Crawford Fremont Harrison Ida Mills Monona Montgomery O’Brien Page Palo Alto Plymouth Pocahontas Sac Shelby Sioux Taylor Woodbury South Dakota: Union * * * * * * * * * * * New York Survey Area New York: Bronx Kings Nassau New York Queens Suffolk Westchester New Jersey: Bergen Essex Hudson Middlesex Morris Passaic Somerset Union Area of Application. Survey Area Plus New York: Putnam Richmond Rockland New Jersey: Hunterdon Monmouth Ocean (Excluding the Fort Dix Military Reservation) Sussex Pennsylvania: Pike * PO 00000 * * Frm 00006 * * * * Philadelphia Survey Area Pennsylvania: Bucks Chester Delaware Montgomery Philadelphia New Jersey: Burlington Camden Gloucester Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Pennsylvania: Carbon Lehigh Northampton New Jersey: Atlantic Cape May Cumberland Mercer Ocean (Fort Dix Military Reservation only) Warren NEW YORK * 1953 * Fmt 4702 * Sfmt 4702 * * * * Scranton-Wilkes-Barre Survey Area Pennsylvania: Lackawanna Luzerne Monroe Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Pennsylvania: Bradford Columbia Lycoming (Excluding Allenwood Federal Prison Camp) Sullivan Susquehanna Wayne Wyoming * * * * * SOUTH DAKOTA Eastern South Dakota Survey Area South Dakota: Minnehaha Area of Application. Survey Area Plus South Dakota: Aurora Beadle Bennett Bon Homme Brookings Brown Brule Buffalo Campbell Charles Mix Clark Clay Codington Corson Davison Day Deuel Dewey E:\FR\FM\14JAP1.SGM 14JAP1 1954 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2009 / Proposed Rules Douglas Edmunds Faulk Grant Gregory Haakon Hamlin Hand Hanson Hughes Hutchinson Hyde Jerauld Jones Kingsbury Lake Lincoln Lyman McCook McPherson Marshall Mellette Miner Moody Potter Roberts Sanborn Spink Stanley Sully Todd Tripp Turner Walworth Washabaugh Yankton Ziebach Iowa: Dickinson Emmet Lyon Osceola Minnesota: Jackson Lincoln Lyon Murray Nobles Pipestone Rock * * Emporia Virginia (counties): Albemarle Amelia Brunswick Buckingham Caroline Charlotte Cumberland Essex Fluvanna Greensville King and Queen King William Lancaster Louisa Lunenberg Mecklenburg Middlesex Northumberland Nottoway Orange Prince Edward Richmond Sussex Westmoreland * sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS * * * * * * * * * * * * [FR Doc. E9–528 Filed 1–13–09; 8:45 am] Richmond Survey Area Virginia (cities): Colonial Heights Hopewell Petersburg Richmond Virginia (counties): Charles City Chesterfield Dinwiddie Goochland Hanover Henrico New Kent Powhatan Prince George Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Virginia (cities): Charlottesville 18:34 Jan 13, 2009 * Milwaukee Survey Area Wisconsin: Milwaukee Ozaukee Washington Waukesha Area of Application. Survey Area Plus Wisconsin: Brown Calumet Door Fond du Lac Kewaunee Manitowoc Outagamie Racine Sheboygan Walworth Winnebago * VerDate Nov<24>2008 * WISCONSIN VIRGINIA * * Jkt 217001 BILLING CODE 6325–39–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Natural Resources Conservation Service 7 CFR Part 625 RIN 0578–AA52 Healthy Forests Reserve Program AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comment. PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 SUMMARY: On May 17, 2006, NRCS published an interim final rule for the Healthy Forests Reserve Program (HFRP) and received 11 comment letters. NRCS proposes to amend this rule to incorporate changes associated with enactment of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (the 2008 Act). The 2008 Act authorizes $9,750,000 for each of the fiscal years 2009 through 2012 to carry out the program. As a result of the 2008 Act, NRCS will allow land enrollment through permanent easements, or easements for a maximum duration allowed under state law and continue to allow enrollment through 10-year costshare agreements; and allow enrollment of land owned by tribes or members of tribes in 30-year contracts or 10-year cost-share agreements, or any combination of both. Forty percent of program expenditures in any fiscal year will be used for restoration cost-share agreement enrollment and 60 percent of program expenditures in any fiscal year will be for easement enrollment. In addition to changes associated with the 2008 Act, NRCS is addressing comments received on the interim final rule and proposing additional changes that improve program implementation based on the experience gained from the HRFP implementation under the interim final rule. DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 13, 2009. Comments will be made available to the public or posted publicly in their entirety. ADDRESSES: You may send comments using any of the following methods: Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending comments electronically. NRCS Web site: Go to https:// www.nrcs.usda.gov and follow the instructions for sending comments electronically. Mail: Easements Programs Division, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Healthy Forests Reserve Program Comments, P.O. 2890, Room 6819–S, Washington, DC 20013. Fax: 1–202–720–4265 Hand Delivery: Room 6819–S of the USDA South Office Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. Please ask the guard at the entrance to the South Office Building to call 202–720–4527 in order to be escorted into the building. This proposed rule may be accessed via Internet. Users can access the NRCS homepage at https:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/; select Farm Bill E:\FR\FM\14JAP1.SGM 14JAP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 1948-1954]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-528]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2009 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 1948]]



OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

5 CFR Part 532

RIN 3206-AL77


Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of Certain Appropriated 
Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas

AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a 
proposed rule that would redefine the geographic boundaries of several 
appropriated fund Federal Wage System wage areas for pay-setting 
purposes. Based on recent reviews of Metropolitan Statistical Area 
boundaries in a number of wage areas, OPM proposes redefinitions 
affecting the following wage areas: Birmingham, AL; Denver, CO; 
Wilmington, DE; Washington, DC; Atlanta, GA; Columbus, GA; Macon, GA; 
Chicago, IL; Bloomington-Bedford-Washington, IN; Indianapolis, IN; 
Louisville, KY; Baltimore, MD; Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD; 
St. Louis, MO; Southern Missouri; Omaha, NE; New York, NY; 
Philadelphia, PA; Scranton-Wilkes-Barre, PA; Eastern South Dakota; 
Richmond, VA; and Milwaukee, WI.

DATES: We must receive comments on or before February 13, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to Charles D. Grimes III, Deputy 
Associate Director for Performance and Pay Systems, Strategic Human 
Resources Policy Division, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Room 
7H31, 1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415-8200; e-mail pay-
performance-policy@opm.gov; or FAX: (202) 606-4264.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Gonzalez, (202) 606-2838; e-
mail pay-performance-policy@opm.gov; or FAX: (202) 606-4264.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management 
(OPM) is issuing a proposed rule to redefine the geographic boundaries 
of several appropriated fund Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas. 
These changes are based on recommendations of the Federal Prevailing 
Rate Advisory Committee (FPRAC), the statutory national labor-
management committee responsible for advising OPM on matters affecting 
the pay of FWS employees. From time to time, FPRAC reviews the 
boundaries of wage areas and provides OPM with recommendations for 
changes if the Committee finds that changes are warranted.
    There are currently 132 FWS wage areas in the United States and the 
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico for blue-collar employees who are paid from 
appropriated funds. Each wage area is comprised of a survey area where 
a lead agency, the Department of Defense, measures local prevailing 
wage levels in a local labor market. Because it is not feasible to 
include every part of the United States in a survey area, those parts 
that are not in a survey area are combined with a nearby survey area to 
form a wage area's area of application.
    OPM considers the following regulatory criteria under 5 CFR 532.211 
when defining FWS wage area boundaries:
    1. Distance, transportation facilities, and geographic features;
    2. Commuting patterns; and
    3. Similarities in overall population, employment, and the kinds 
and sizes of private industrial establishments.
    In addition, OPM regulations at 5 CFR 532.211 do not permit 
splitting Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) for the purpose of 
defining a wage area, except in very unusual circumstances (e.g., 
organizational relationships among closely located Federal activities).
    The Office of Management and Budget defines MSAs and maintains and 
updates the definitions of MSA boundaries following each decennial 
census. MSAs are composed of counties and are defined on the basis of a 
central urbanized area-a contiguous area of relatively high population 
density. Additional surrounding counties are included in MSAs if they 
have strong social and economic ties to central counties.
    When the boundaries of wage areas were first established in the 
1960s, there were fewer MSAs than there are today and the boundaries of 
the then existing MSAs were much smaller. Most MSAs were contained 
within the boundaries of a wage area. MSAs have expanded each decade 
and in some cases now extend beyond the boundaries of the wage area.
    FPRAC recently reviewed several wage areas where boundaries 
subdivide certain MSAs and concurred by consensus with the changes 
described in this proposed rule. These changes would be effective on 
the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after 
30 days following publication of the final regulations. FPRAC 
recommended no other changes in the geographic definitions of the wage 
areas.
    Birmingham-Hoover, AL MSA: Bibb, Blount, Chilton, Jefferson, St. 
Clair, Shelby, and Walker Counties, AL, comprise the Birmingham-Hoover, 
AL MSA. Jefferson, St. Clair, Shelby, and Walker Counties are part of 
the Birmingham survey area, Bibb and Blount Counties are part of the 
Birmingham area of application, and Chilton County is part of the 
Columbus area of application. OPM proposes to redefine Chilton County 
to the Birmingham area of application so that the entire Birmingham-
Hoover, AL MSA is in one wage area. There are currently no FWS 
employees working in Chilton County.
    Denver-Aurora, CO MSA: Adams, Arapahoe, Broomfield, Clear Creek, 
Denver, Douglas, Elbert, Gilpin, Jefferson, and Park Counties, CO, 
comprise the Denver-Aurora, CO MSA. Adams, Arapahoe, Denver, Douglas, 
Gilpin, and Jefferson Counties are part of the Denver, CO, survey area 
and Clear Creek, Elbert, and Park are part of the Denver area of 
application. Broomfield County is currently undefined.
    The municipality of Broomfield was incorporated in 1961 in the 
southeastern corner of Boulder County, CO. On November 15, 2001, 
Broomfield County officially separated from Boulder County and became 
the 64th county of Colorado. The boundaries of the City of Broomfield 
and the County of Broomfield are identical.
    OPM proposes to define Broomfield County as part of the Denver 
survey area. There are three FWS employees working in Broomfield 
County.
    Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-MD-VA-WV MSA: Washington, DC; 
Calvert, Charles, Frederick,

[[Page 1949]]

Montgomery, and Prince George's Counties, MD; Arlington, Clarke, 
Fairfax, Fauquier, Loudoun, Prince William, Spotsylvania, Stafford, and 
Warren Counties, VA; Alexandria, Fairfax, Falls Church, Fredericksburg, 
Manassas, and Manassas Park Cities, VA; and Jefferson County, WV, 
comprise the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-MD-VA-WV MSA. 
Washington, DC; Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince George's 
Counties, MD; Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, and Prince William Counties, 
VA; and Alexandria, Fairfax, Falls Church, Manassas, and Manassas Park 
Cities, VA; are part of the Washington survey area. Calvert and St. 
Mary's Counties, MD, and Fauquier, King George, and Stafford Counties, 
VA, are part of the Washington area of application. Spotsylvania County 
and Fredericksburg City, VA, are part of the Richmond area of 
application. Clarke and Warren Counties, VA, and Jefferson County, WV, 
are part of the Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg area of 
application. OPM proposes to redefine Clarke, Spotsylvania, and Warren 
Counties, VA, Fredericksburg City, VA, and Jefferson County, WV, to the 
Washington area of application so that the entire Washington-Arlington-
Alexandria, DC-MD-VA-WV MSA is in one wage area. There are no FWS 
employees working in Clarke and Spotsylvania Counties, but there are 31 
FWS employees working in Warren County, 9 FWS employees working in 
Fredericksburg City, and 50 FWS employees working in Jefferson County.
    Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA MSA: Barlow, Barrow, Butts, 
Carroll, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, Dawson, DeKalb, Douglas, 
Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Haralson, Heard, Henry, Jasper, 
Lamar, Meriwether, Newton, Paulding, Pickens, Pike, Rockdale, Spalding, 
and Walton Counties, GA, comprise the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, 
GA MSA. Butts, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, 
Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, Newton, Paulding, Rockdale, and 
Walton Counties are part of the Atlanta survey area; Bartow, Barrow, 
Carroll, Coweta, Dawson, Haralson, Heard, Pickens, Pike, and Spalding 
Counties are part of the Atlanta area of application; Jasper and Lamar 
Counties are part of the Macon area of application; and Meriwether 
County is part of the Columbus area of application. OPM proposes to 
redefine Jasper, Lamar, and Meriwether Counties to the Atlanta area of 
application so that the entire Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA MSA 
is in one wage area. There are no FWS employees working in Jasper and 
Lamar Counties, but there is one FWS employee working in Meriwether 
County.
    Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI MSA: Cook, DeKalb, DuPage, 
Grundy, Kane, Kendall, McHenry, and Will Counties, IL; Jasper, Lake, 
Newton, and Porter Counties, IN; and Lake and Kenosha Counties, WI, 
comprise the Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI MSA. Cook, DuPage, 
Kane, McHenry, and Will Counties, IL, and Lake County, WI, are part of 
the Chicago survey area; DeKalb, Grundy, and Kendall, IL, and Jasper, 
Lake, Newton, and Porter Counties, IN, are part of the Chicago area of 
application; and Kenosha County, WI, is part of the Milwaukee area of 
application. OPM proposes to redefine Kenosha County to the Chicago 
area of application so that the entire Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-
IN-WI MSA is in one wage area. There are six FWS employees working in 
Kenosha County.
    Indianapolis, IN MSA: Boone, Brown, Hamilton, Hancock, Hendricks, 
Johnson, Marion, Morgan, Putnam, and Shelby Counties, IN, comprise the 
Indianapolis, IN MSA. Boone, Hamilton, Hancock, Hendricks, Johnson, 
Marion, Morgan, and Shelby Counties are part of the Indianapolis survey 
area; Putnam County is part of the Indianapolis area of application; 
and Brown County is part of the Bloomington-Bedford-Washington area of 
application. OPM proposes to redefine Brown County to the Indianapolis 
area of application so that the entire Indianapolis, IN MSA is in one 
wage area. There are no FWS employees working in Brown County.
    Sioux City, IA-NE-SD MSA: Woodbury County, IA, Dakota and Dixon 
Counties, NE, and Union County, SD, comprise the Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 
MSA. Woodbury County, IA, and Dakota and Dixon Counties, NE, are part 
of the Omaha area of application and Union County, SD, is part of the 
Eastern South Dakota area of application. OPM proposes to redefine 
Union County to the Omaha area of application so that the entire Sioux 
City, IA-NE-SD MSA is in one wage area. There are no FWS employees 
working in Union County.
    Louisville, KY-IN MSA: Clark, Floyd, Harrison, and Washington 
County, IN, and Bullitt, Henry, Jefferson, Meade, Nelson, Oldham, 
Shelby, Spencer, and Trimble Counties, KY, comprise the Louisville, KY-
IN MSA. Clark, and Floyd Counties, IN, and Bullitt, Jefferson, and 
Oldham Counties, KY, are part of the Louisville survey area; Harrison 
County, IN, and Henry, Meade, Nelson, Shelby, Spencer, and Trimble 
Counties, KY, are part of the Louisville area of application; and 
Washington County, IN, is part of the Bloomington-Bedford-Washington 
area of application. OPM proposes to redefine Washington County to the 
Louisville area of application so that the entire Louisville, KY-IN MSA 
is in one wage area. There are no FWS employees working in Washington 
County.
    Baltimore-Towson, MD MSA: Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, 
Harford, Howard, and Queen Anne's Counties, MD, and Baltimore City, MD, 
comprise the Baltimore-Towson, MD MSA. Anne Arundel, Baltimore, 
Carroll, Harford, and Howard Counties and Baltimore City are part of 
the Baltimore survey area and Queen Anne's County is part of the 
Wilmington area of application. OPM proposes to redefine Queen Anne's 
County to the Baltimore area of application so that the entire 
Baltimore-Towson, MD MSA is in one wage area. There are no FWS 
employees working in Queen Anne's County.
    Jefferson City, MO MSA: Callaway, Cole, Moniteau, and Osage 
Counties, MO, comprise the Jefferson City, MO MSA. Callaway, Cole, and 
Osage Counties are part of the St. Louis area of application and 
Moniteau County is part of the Southern Missouri area of application. 
OPM proposes to redefine Moniteau County to the St. Louis area of 
application so that the entire Jefferson City, MO MSA is in one wage 
area. There are no FWS employees working in Moniteau County.
    New York-Newark-Edison, NY-NJ-PA MSA: Bergen, Essex, Hudson, 
Hunterdon, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Somerset, 
Sussex, and Union Counties, NJ; Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Putnam, 
Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk, and Westchester Counties, NY; and 
Pike County, PA, comprise the New York-Newark-Edison, NY-NJ-PA MSA. 
Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Middlesex, Morris, Passaic, Somerset, and Union 
Counties, NJ, and Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Queens, Suffolk, and 
Westchester Counties, NY, are part of the New York survey area. 
Monmouth, Ocean (excluding the Fort Dix Military Reservation), and 
Sussex Counties, NJ, and Putnam, Richmond, and Rockland Counties, NY, 
are part of the New York area of application. Hunterdon County, NJ, is 
part of the Philadelphia area of application and Pike County, PA, is 
part of the Scranton-Wilkes-Barre area of application. OPM proposes to 
redefine Hunterdon County, NJ, and Pike County, PA, to the New York 
area of application so that the entire New York-Newark-Edison, NY-NJ-PA 
MSA is in one wage area. There are no FWS employees working in 
Hunterdon

[[Page 1950]]

County, but there are five FWS employees working in Pike County.
    Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ MSA: Warren County, NJ, and 
Carbon, Lehigh, and Northampton Counties, PA, comprise the Allentown-
Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ MSA. Warren County, NJ, and Lehigh and 
Northampton Counties, PA are part of the Philadelphia area of 
application and Carbon County, PA, is part of the Scranton-Wilkes-Barre 
area of application. OPM proposes to redefine Carbon County to the 
Philadelphia area of application so that the entire Allentown-
Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ MSA is in one wage area. There are three FWS 
employees working in Carbon County.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    I certify that these regulations would not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they 
would affect only Federal agencies and employees.

List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532

    Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, 
Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Michael W. Hager,
Acting Director.

    Accordingly, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management is proposing 
to amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows:

PART 532--PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS

    1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; Sec.  532.707 also issued under 
5 U.S.C. 552.

    2. Appendix C to subpart B is amended by revising the wage area 
listings for Birmingham, AL; Denver, CO; Wilmington, DE; Washington, 
DC; Atlanta, GA; Columbus, GA; Macon, GA; Chicago, IL; Bloomington-
Bedford-Washington, IN; Indianapolis, IN; Louisville, KY; Baltimore, 
MD; Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg, MD; St. Louis, MO; Southern 
Missouri; Omaha, NE; New York, NY; Philadelphia, PA; Scranton-Wilkes-
Barre, PA; Eastern South Dakota; Richmond, VA; and Milwaukee, WI, to 
read as follows:

APPENDIX C TO SUBPART B OF PART 532--APPROPRIATED FUND WAGE AND SURVEY 
AREAS

* * * * *

ALABAMA

* * * * *

Birmingham

Survey Area

Alabama:
    Jefferson
    St. Clair
    Shelby
    Tuscaloosa
    Walker

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Alabama:
    Bibb
    Blount
    Chilton
    Cullman
    Fayette
    Greene
    Hale
    Lamar
    Marengo
    Perry
    Pickens
* * * * *

COLORADO

Denver

Survey Area

Colorado:
    Adams
    Arapahoe
    Boulder
    Broomfield
    Denver
    Douglas
    Gilpin
    Jefferson

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Colorado:
    Clear Creek
    Eagle
    Elbert
    Garfield
    Grand
    Jackson
    Lake
    Larimer
    Logan
    Morgan
    Park
    Phillips
    Pitkin
    Rio Blanco
    Routt
    Sedgwick
    Summit
    Washington
    Weld
    Yuma
* * * * *

DELAWARE

Wilmington

Survey Area

Delaware:
    Kent
    New Castle
Maryland:
    Cecil
New Jersey:
    Salem

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Delaware:
    Sussex
Maryland:
    Caroline
    Dorchester
    Kent
    Somerset
    Talbot
    Wicomico
    Worcester (Does not include the Assateague Island portion.)
* * * * *

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Washington, DC

Survey Area

District of Columbia:
    Washington, DC
Maryland:
    Charles
    Frederick
    Montgomery
    Prince George's
Virginia (cities):
    Alexandria
    Fairfax
    Falls Church
    Manassas
    Manassas Park
Virginia (counties):
    Arlington
    Fairfax
    Loudoun
    Prince William

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Maryland:
    Calvert
    St. Mary's
    Virginia (city):
    Fredericksburg
    Virginia (counties):
    Clarke
    Fauquier
    King George
    Spotsylvania
    Stafford
    Warren
West Virginia:
    Jefferson
* * * * *

GEORGIA

* * * * *

Atlanta

Survey Area

Georgia:
    Butts
    Cherokee
    Clayton
    Cobb
    De Kalb
    Douglas
    Fayette
    Forsyth
    Fulton
    Gwinnett
    Henry
    Newton
    Paulding
    Rockdale
    Walton

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Georgia:

[[Page 1951]]

    Banks
    Barrow
    Bartow
    Carroll
    Chattooga
    Clarke
    Coweta
    Dawson
    Fannin
    Floyd
    Franklin
    Gilmer
    Gordon
    Greene
    Habersham
    Hall
    Haralson
    Heard
    Jackson
    Jasper
    Lamar
    Lumpkin
    Madison
    Meriwether
    Morgan
    Murray
    Oconee
    Oglethorpe
    Pickens
    Pike
    Polk
    Rabun
    Spalding
    Stephens
    Towns
    Union
    White
    Whitfield
* * * * *

Columbus

Survey Area

Georgia (counties):
    Chattahoochee
Georgia (consolidated government):
    Columbus
Alabama:
    Autauga
    Elmore
    Lee
    Macon
    Montgomery
    Russell

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Georgia:
    Harris
    Marion
    Quitman
    Schley
    Stewart
    Talbot
    Taylor
    Webster
Alabama:
    Bullock
    Butler
    Chambers
    Coosa
    Crenshaw
    Dallas
    Lowndes
    Pike
    Tallapoosa
    Wilcox

Macon

Survey Area

Georgia:
    Bibb
    Houston
    Jones
    Laurens
    Twiggs
    Wilkinson

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Georgia:
    Baldwin
    Bleckley
    Crawford
    Crisp
    Dodge
    Dooly
    Hancock
    Johnson
    Macon
    Monroe
    Montgomery
    Peach
    Pulaski
    Putnam
    Telfair
    Treutlen
    Upson
    Washington
    Wheeler
    Wilcox
* * * * *

ILLINOIS

* * * * *

Chicago

Survey Area

Illinois:
    Cook
    Du Page
    Kane
    Lake
    McHenry
    Will

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Illinois:
    Boone
    De Kalb
    Grundy
    Iroquois
    Kankakee
    Kendall
    La Salle
    Lee
    Livingston
    Ogle
    Stephenson
    Winnebago
Indiana:
    Benton
    Jasper
    Lake
    La Porte
    Newton
    Porter
    Pulaski
    Starke
Wisconsin:
    Kenosha

INDIANA

Bloomington-Bedford-Washington

Survey Area

Indiana:
    Daviess
    Greene
    Knox
    Lawrence
    Martin
    Monroe
    Orange

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Indiana:
    Crawford
    Dubois
    Gibson
    Jackson
    Owen
    Perry
    Pike
    Posey
    Spencer
    Vanderburgh
    Warrick
Illinois:
    Edwards
    Gallatin
    Hardin
    Lawrence
    Richland
    Wabash
    White
Kentucky:
    Crittenden
    Daviess
    Hancock
    Henderson
    Livingston
    McLean
    Ohio
    Union
    Webster
* * * * *

Indianapolis

Survey Area

Indiana:
    Boone
    Hamilton
    Hancock
    Hendricks
    Johnson
    Marion
    Morgan
    Shelby

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Indiana:
    Bartholomew
    Brown
    Clay
    Clinton
    Decatur
    Delaware
    Fayette
    Fountain
    Henry
    Madison
    Montgomery
    Parke
    Putnam
    Rush
    Sullivan
    Tippecanoe

[[Page 1952]]

    Tipton
    Vermillion
    Vigo
    Warren
* * * * *

KENTUCKY

* * * * *

Louisville

Survey Area

Kentucky:
    Bullitt
    Hardin
    Jefferson
    Oldham
Indiana:
    Clark
    Floyd
    Jefferson

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Kentucky:
    Breckinridge
    Grayson
    Hart
    Henry
    Larue
    Meade
    Nelson
    Shelby
    Spencer
    Trimble
Indiana:
    Harrison
    Jennings
    Scott
    Washington
* * * * *

MARYLAND

* * * * *

Baltimore

Survey Area

Maryland:
    Baltimore City
    Anne Arundel
    Baltimore
    Carroll
    Harford
    Howard

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Maryland:
    Queen Anne's

Hagerstown-Martinsburg-Chambersburg

Survey Area

Maryland:
    Washington
Pennsylvania:
    Franklin
West Virginia:
    Berkeley

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Maryland:
    Allegany
    Garrett
Pennsylvania:
    Fulton
Virginia (cities):
    Harrisonburg
    Winchester
Virginia (counties):
    Culpeper
    Frederick
    Greene
    Madison
    Page
    Rappahannock
    Rockingham
    Shenandoah
West Virginia:
    Hampshire
    Hardy
    Mineral
    Morgan
* * * * *

MISSOURI

St. Louis

Survey Area

Missouri:
    St. Louis City
    Franklin
    Jefferson
    St. Charles
    St. Louis
Illinois:
    Clinton
    Madison
    Monroe
    St. Clair

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Missouri:
    Audrain
    Boone
    Callaway
    Clark
    Cole
    Crawford
    Gasconade
    Knox
    Lewis
    Lincoln
    Marion
    Moniteau
    Monroe
    Montgomery
    Osage
    Pike
    Ralls
    Randolph
    St. Francois
    Ste. Genevieve
    Scotland
    Shelby
    Warren
    Washington
Illinois:
    Alexander
    Bond
    Calhoun
    Clay
    Effingham
    Fayette
    Franklin
    Greene
    Hamilton
    Jackson
    Jefferson
    Jersey
    Johnson
    Macoupin
    Marion
    Massac
    Montgomery
    Morgan
    Perry
    Pike
    Pope
    Pulaski
    Randolph
    Saline
    Scott
    Union
    Washington
    Wayne
    Williamson

Southern Missouri

Survey Area

Missouri:
    Christian
    Greene
    Laclede
    Phelps
    Pulaski
    Webster

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Missouri:
    Barry
    Barton
    Benton
    Bollinger
    Butler
    Camden
    Cape Girardeau
    Carter
    Cedar
    Dade
    Dallas
    Dent
    Douglas
    Hickory
    Howell
    Iron
    Jasper
    Lawrence
    McDonald
    Madison
    Maries
    Miller
    Mississippi
    Morgan
    New Madrid
    Newton
    Oregon
    Ozark
    Perry
    Polk
    Reynolds
    Ripley
    St. Clair
    Scott
    Shannon
    Stoddard
    Stone
    Taney
    Texas
    Vernon
    Wayne
    Wright
Kansas:
    Cherokee
    Crawford
* * * * *

NEBRASKA

Omaha

Survey Area

Nebraska:

[[Page 1953]]

    Douglas
    Lancaster
    Sarpy
Iowa:
    Pottawattamie

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Nebraska:
    Adams
    Antelope
    Arthur
    Blaine
    Boone
    Boyd
    Brown
    Buffalo
    Burt
    Butler
    Cass
    Cedar
    Chase
    Cherry
    Clay
    Colfax
    Cuming
    Custer
    Dakota
    Dawson
    Dixon
    Dodge
    Dundy
    Fillmore
    Franklin
    Frontier
    Furnas
    Gage
    Garfield
    Gosper
    Grant
    Greeley
    Hall
    Hamilton
    Harlan
    Hayes
    Hitchcock
    Holt
    Hooker
    Howard
    Jefferson
    Johnson
    Kearney
    Keith
    Keya Paha
    Knox
    Lincoln
    Logan
    Loup
    McPherson
    Madison
    Merrick
    Nance
    Nemaha
    Nuckolls
    Otoe
    Pawnee
    Perkins
    Phelps
    Pierce
    Platte
    Polk
    Red Willow
    Richardson
    Rock
    Saline
    Saunders
    Seward
    Sherman
    Stanton
    Thayer
    Thomas
    Thurston
    Valley
    Washington
    Wayne
    Webster
    Wheeler
    York
Iowa:
    Adams
    Audubon
    Buena Vista
    Cass
    Cherokee
    Clay
    Crawford
    Fremont
    Harrison
    Ida
    Mills
    Monona
    Montgomery
    O'Brien
    Page
    Palo Alto
    Plymouth
    Pocahontas
    Sac
    Shelby
    Sioux
    Taylor
    Woodbury
South Dakota:
    Union
* * * * *

NEW YORK

* * * * *

New York

Survey Area

New York:
    Bronx
    Kings
    Nassau
    New York
    Queens
    Suffolk
    Westchester
New Jersey:
    Bergen
    Essex
    Hudson
    Middlesex
    Morris
    Passaic
    Somerset
    Union

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

New York:
    Putnam
    Richmond
    Rockland
New Jersey:
    Hunterdon
    Monmouth
    Ocean (Excluding the Fort Dix Military Reservation)
    Sussex
Pennsylvania:
    Pike
* * * * *

PENNSYLVANIA

* * * * *

Philadelphia

Survey Area

Pennsylvania:
    Bucks
    Chester
    Delaware
    Montgomery
    Philadelphia
New Jersey:
    Burlington
    Camden
    Gloucester

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Pennsylvania:
    Carbon
    Lehigh
    Northampton
New Jersey:
    Atlantic
    Cape May
    Cumberland
    Mercer
    Ocean (Fort Dix Military Reservation only)
    Warren
* * * * *

Scranton-Wilkes-Barre

Survey Area

Pennsylvania:
    Lackawanna
    Luzerne
    Monroe

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Pennsylvania:
    Bradford
    Columbia
    Lycoming (Excluding Allenwood Federal Prison Camp)
    Sullivan
    Susquehanna
    Wayne
    Wyoming
* * * * *

SOUTH DAKOTA

Eastern South Dakota

Survey Area

South Dakota:
    Minnehaha

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

South Dakota:
    Aurora
    Beadle
    Bennett
    Bon Homme
    Brookings
    Brown
    Brule
    Buffalo
    Campbell
    Charles Mix
    Clark
    Clay
    Codington
    Corson
    Davison
    Day
    Deuel
    Dewey

[[Page 1954]]

    Douglas
    Edmunds
    Faulk
    Grant
    Gregory
    Haakon
    Hamlin
    Hand
    Hanson
    Hughes
    Hutchinson
    Hyde
    Jerauld
    Jones
    Kingsbury
    Lake
    Lincoln
    Lyman
    McCook
    McPherson
    Marshall
    Mellette
    Miner
    Moody
    Potter
    Roberts
    Sanborn
    Spink
    Stanley
    Sully
    Todd
    Tripp
    Turner
    Walworth
    Washabaugh
    Yankton
    Ziebach
Iowa:
    Dickinson
    Emmet
    Lyon
    Osceola
Minnesota:
    Jackson
    Lincoln
    Lyon
    Murray
    Nobles
    Pipestone
    Rock
* * * * *

VIRGINIA

* * * * *

Richmond

Survey Area

Virginia (cities):
    Colonial Heights
    Hopewell
    Petersburg
    Richmond
Virginia (counties):
    Charles City
    Chesterfield
    Dinwiddie
    Goochland
    Hanover
    Henrico
    New Kent
    Powhatan
    Prince George

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Virginia (cities):
    Charlottesville
    Emporia
Virginia (counties):
    Albemarle
    Amelia
    Brunswick
    Buckingham
    Caroline
    Charlotte
    Cumberland
    Essex
    Fluvanna
    Greensville
    King and Queen
    King William
    Lancaster
    Louisa
    Lunenberg
    Mecklenburg
    Middlesex
    Northumberland
    Nottoway
    Orange
    Prince Edward
    Richmond
    Sussex
    Westmoreland
* * * * *

WISCONSIN

* * * * *

Milwaukee

Survey Area

Wisconsin:
    Milwaukee
    Ozaukee
    Washington
    Waukesha

Area of Application. Survey Area Plus

Wisconsin:
    Brown
    Calumet
    Door
    Fond du Lac
    Kewaunee
    Manitowoc
    Outagamie
    Racine
    Sheboygan
    Walworth
    Winnebago

 [FR Doc. E9-528 Filed 1-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.