Decision-Making Authority Regarding the Denial, Suspension, or Revocation of a Federal Firearms License, or Imposition of a Civil Fine (2008R-10P), 1875-1878 [E9-527]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
Part 71 continues to read as follows:
27 CFR Part 478
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR Part 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9S, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
signed October 3, 2008, and effective
October 31, 2008, is amended as
follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface.
*
*
*
ASW TX E5
*
*
Houston, TX [Amended]
Point of Origin
(Lat. 30°35′01″ N., long. 95°28′01″ W.)
Anahuac, Chambers County Airport, TX
(Lat. 29°46′11″ N., long. 94°39′49″ W.)
Galveston, Scholes International at
Galveston, TX
(Lat. 29°15′55″ N., long. 94°51′38″ W.)
Brookshire, Woods No. 2 Airport, TX
(Lat. 29°47′37″ N., long. 95°55′31″ W.)
Fulshear, Covey Trails Airport, TX
(Lat. 29°41′24″ N., long. 95°50′23″ W.)
Conroe, Lone Star Executive Airport, TX
(Lat. 30°21′09″ N., long. 95°24′52″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within an area
bounded by a line beginning at the Point of
Origin to lat. 29°45′00″ N., long. 94°44′01″
W.; thence from lat. 29°45′00″ N., long.
94°44′01″ W. to a point of tangency with the
east arc of a 7.6-mile radius of Scholes
International at Galveston, and within a 7.6mile radius of Scholes International at
Galveston; thence from lat. 29°17′04″ N.,
long. 95°00′13″ W.; to lat. 29°30′01″ N., long.
95°54′01″ W.; to lat. 30°26′01″ N., long.
95°42′01″ W.; to the point of origin, and
within a 6.6-mile radius of Lone Star
Executive Airport, and within a 6.5-mile
radius of Woods No. 2 Airport, and within
a 6.4-mile radius of Covey Trails Airport
excluding that airspace within the Anahuac,
TX, Class E airspace area.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on January 7,
2009.
Walter L. Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. E9–516 Filed 1–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:42 Jan 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms,
and Explosives
[Docket No. ATF 27P; AG Order No. 3030–
2009]
Decision-Making Authority Regarding
the Denial, Suspension, or Revocation
of a Federal Firearms License, or
Imposition of a Civil Fine (2008R–10P)
AGENCY: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives (ATF),
Department of Justice.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request
for comments.
SUMMARY: The Department of Justice is
amending the regulations of the Bureau
of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
Explosives (‘‘ATF’’) to delegate to the
Director of ATF the authority to serve as
the deciding official regarding the
denial, suspension, or revocation of
federal firearms licenses, or the
imposition of a civil fine. The Director
will have the flexibility to delegate to
another ATF official the authority to
decide a revocation or denial matter, or
may exercise that authority himself.
Such flexibility will allow ATF to more
efficiently decide denial, suspension,
and revocation hearings and also
whether to impose a civil fine, because
the Director can redelegate to
Headquarters officials, field officials, or
some combination thereof, authority to
take action as the final agency decision
maker. This will give the agency the
ability to ensure consistency in decision
making and to address any case
backlogs that may occur.
The interim rule will remain in effect
until superseded by final regulations.
DATES: Effective Date: This interim rule
is effective January 14, 2009.
Comment date: Written comments
must be postmarked and electronic
comments must be submitted on or
before April 14, 2009. Commenters
should be aware that the electronic
Federal Docket Management System
will not accept comments after
Midnight Eastern Time on the last day
of the comment period.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to any of
the following addresses—
• James P. Ficaretta, Program
Manager, Room 6N–602, Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
Explosives, P.O. Box 50221,
Washington, DC 20091–0221; ATTN:
ATF 27P. Written comments must
include your mailing address and be
signed, and may be of any length.
• 202–648–9741 (facsimile).
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1875
• https://www.regulations.gov. Federal
e-rulemaking portal; follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
You may also view an electronic
version of this rule at the https://
www.regulations.gov site.
See the Public Participation section at
the end of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for instructions and
requirements for submitting comments,
and for information on how to request
a public hearing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James P. Ficaretta, Enforcement
Programs and Services, Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
Explosives, U.S. Department of Justice,
99 New York Avenue, NE., Washington,
DC 20226; telephone: (202) 648–7094.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Attorney General is responsible
for enforcing the provisions of the Gun
Control Act of 1968 (‘‘the Act’’), 18
U.S.C. Chapter 44. He has delegated that
responsibility to the Director of ATF,
subject to the direction of the Attorney
General and the Deputy Attorney
General. 28 CFR 0.130(a). ATF has
promulgated regulations that implement
the provisions of the Act in 27 CFR Part
478.
The regulations in Subpart E of Part
478, §§ 478.71–78, relate to proceedings
involving federal firearms licenses,
including the denial, suspension, and
revocation of a license, and the
imposition of a civil fine. Section 478.71
provides that whenever the Director of
Industry Operations (‘‘DIO’’) has reason
to believe that an applicant is not
qualified to receive a license under the
provisions of § 478.47, he may issue a
notice of denial, on ATF Form 4498, to
the applicant. The notice will set forth
the matters of fact and law relied upon
in determining that the application
should be denied, and will afford the
applicant 15 days from the date of
receipt of the notice in which to request
a hearing to review the denial. If no
request for a hearing is filed within such
time, the application will be
disapproved and a copy, so marked, will
be returned to the applicant.
Under § 478.72, an applicant who has
been denied an original or renewal
license can file a request with the DIO
for a hearing to review the denial of the
application. On conclusion of the
hearing and after consideration of all
relevant facts and circumstances
presented by the applicant or his
representative, the DIO renders a
decision confirming or reversing the
denial of the application. If the decision
is that the denial should stand, a
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
1876
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
certified copy of the DIO’s findings and
conclusions are furnished to the
applicant with a final notice of denial,
ATF Form 4501. In addition, a copy of
the application, marked ‘‘Disapproved,’’
is furnished to the applicant. If the
decision is that the license applied for
should be issued, the applicant will be
so notified, in writing, and the license
will be issued.
Section 478.73 provides that
whenever the DIO has reason to believe
that a firearms licensee has willfully
violated any provision of the Act or part
478, a notice of revocation of the license
(ATF Form 4500), may be issued. In
addition, a notice of revocation,
suspension, or imposition of a civil fine
may be issued on Form 4500 whenever
the DIO has reason to believe that a
licensee has knowingly transferred a
firearm to an unlicensed person and
knowingly failed to comply with the
requirements of section 922(t)(1),
relating to a NICS (National Instant
Criminal Background Check System)
background check.
As specified in § 478.74, a licensee
who received a notice of suspension or
revocation of a license, or imposition of
a civil fine, may file a request for a
hearing with the DIO. On conclusion of
the hearing and after consideration of all
the relevant presentations made by the
licensee or the licensee’s representative,
the DIO renders a decision and prepares
a brief summary of the findings and
conclusions on which the decision was
based. If the decision is that the license
should be revoked or, in actions under
section 922(t)(5), that the license should
be revoked or suspended, and/or that a
civil fine should be imposed, a certified
copy of the summary is furnished to the
licensee with the final notice of
revocation, suspension, or imposition of
a civil fine on ATF Form 4501. If the
decision is that the license should not
be revoked, or in actions under section
922(t)(5), that the license should not be
revoked or suspended, and a civil fine
should not be imposed, the licensee will
be notified in writing.
Under § 478.76, an applicant or
licensee may be represented by an
attorney, certified public accountant, or
other person recognized to practice
before ATF, provided certain
requirements are met. The DIO may be
represented in proceedings by an
attorney in the office of the Assistant
Chief Counsel or Division Counsel who
is authorized to execute and file
motions, briefs and other papers in the
proceeding, on behalf of the DIO, in his
own name as ‘‘Attorney for the
Government.’’
Section 478.78 provides that if a
licensee is dissatisfied with a post-
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:42 Jan 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
hearing decision revoking or suspending
the license or denying the application or
imposing a civil fine, as the case may
be, he may file a petition for judicial
review of such action. In such case,
when the DIO finds that justice so
requires, he may postpone the effective
date of suspension or revocation of a
license or authorize continued
operations under the expired license, as
applicable, pending judicial review.
II. Interim Rule
As indicated above, at present ATF’s
regulations name the DIO as the
deciding official in matters dealing with
the denial of an original or renewal
firearms license, the suspension or
revocation of a license, and the
imposition of a civil fine. This interim
rule amends the regulations to
redesignate the Director as the deciding
official. ATF believes that delegating the
final authority with respect to those
matters to the Director is necessary and
proper. ATF further believes that the
Director should be able to redelegate
this authority to the DIO or any other
agency official through issuance of a
delegation order, not through regulation.
This is consistent with other regulations
in part 478. For example, § 478.144
provides that the Director is the
deciding authority with respect to
applications for relief from firearms
disabilities. Pursuant to ATF Order
1120.4 (69 FR 55462, September 14,
2004), the authority to make
determinations on applications for relief
from federal firearms disabilities was
delegated to the Assistant Director
(Enforcement Programs and Services).
ATF believes that it is appropriate for
the Director to have more flexibility to
change the delegation of authority to
decide a hearing regarding denial,
suspension, or revocation of a federal
firearms license, and a hearing regarding
imposition of a civil fine, or to exercise
that authority himself. Such flexibility
will allow ATF to more efficiently
decide revocation and denial hearings,
because the Director can designate
Headquarters officials, field officials, or
some combination thereof, as the final
agency decision maker. That flexibility
will give the agency the ability to ensure
consistency in decision making and to
address any case backlogs that may
occur.
How This Document Complies With the
Federal Administrative Requirements
for Rulemaking
A. Executive Order 12866
The Attorney General has determined
that this rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory
Planning and Review. This rule will not
have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million, nor will it adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health, or safety, or State, local
or tribal governments or communities.
This is a rule of agency organization,
procedure, and practice. It merely
redesignates the Director as the deciding
official with respect to the denial,
suspension, or revocation of a federal
firearms license and the imposition of a
civil fine.
B. Executive Order 13132
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the federal
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with section 6 of Executive
Order 13132, the Attorney General has
determined that this regulation will not
have sufficient federalism implications
to warrant the preparation of a
federalism summary impact statement.
C. Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform.
D. Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
Notice and comment rulemaking is
not required for this interim final rule.
Under the APA, ‘‘rules of agency
organization, procedure or practice,’’ 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A), that do not
‘‘affect[ ] individual rights and
obligations,’’ Morton v. Ruiz, 415 U.S.
199, 232 (1974), are exempt from the
general notice and comment
requirements of section 553. See JEM
Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 22 F.3d 320,
326 (D.C. Cir. 1994) (section
553(b)(3)(A) applies to ‘‘agency actions
that do not themselves alter the rights or
interests of parties, although [they] may
alter the manner in which the parties
present themselves or their viewpoints
to the agency’’). The revisions to the
regulations in §§ 478.71–78 are purely
matters of agency organization,
procedure, and practice. The interim
final rule will not affect substantive
rights or interests of federal firearms
licensees or applicants for federal
firearms licensees. Nevertheless, ATF
welcomes public comments on the
interim final rule.
Furthermore, there is good cause for
finding that the interim final rule is
exempt from the effective date
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
limitation of section 553(d). The interim
final rule will grant the Director more
flexibility to change the delegation of
authority to decide a hearing regarding
denial, suspension, or revocation of a
federal firearms license, and a hearing
regarding imposition of a civil fine, or
to exercise that authority himself. Such
flexibility will allow ATF to more
efficiently decide revocation and denial
hearings, because the Director can
designate Headquarters officials, field
officials, or some combination thereof,
as the final agency decision maker. This
will enable the Director to ensure
consistency in decision making and to
address any case backlogs that may
occur.
There is no reason to defer these
benefits for thirty days. The interim
final rule will not alter the rights or
obligations of third parties, although it
may alter the manner in which those
parties present themselves or their
viewpoints to the agency. No matter
how the Director delegates his authority
to revoke or deny federal firearms
licenses pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 923(e),
persons who apply for or hold federal
firearms licenses will still have a right
to due process during the agency
administrative proceeding, including a
right to a hearing (18 U.S.C. 923(f)(2)),
a right to a written notice from the
agency specifying the grounds for denial
or revocation (18 U.S.C. 923(f)(3)), and
a right to judicial review (18 U.S.C.
923(f)(3)). Therefore, there is good cause
to make the interim final rule effective
immediately.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq., requires an agency to
conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis
of any rule subject to notice and
comment rulemaking requirements
unless the agency certifies that the rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. See 5 U.S.C. 605(b). As noted
above, this rule is not subject to notice
and comment rulemaking requirements.
Id. 553(b)(A). This is a rule of agency
organization, procedure, and practice. It
merely delegates to the Director the
authority to make decisions with respect
to the denial, suspension, imposition of
a civil fine, or revocation of federal
firearms licenses.
F. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 251 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C. 804. This
rule will not result in an annual effect
on the economy of $100 million or
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:42 Jan 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
more; a major increase in costs or prices;
or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector of $100 million or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
H. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Public Participation
A. Comments Sought
ATF is requesting comments on the
interim final rule from all interested
persons. ATF is also specifically
requesting comments on the clarity of
this interim final rule and how it may
be made easier to understand.
All comments must reference this
document docket number (ATF 27P), be
legible, and include your name and
mailing address. ATF will treat all
comments as originals and will not
acknowledge receipt of comments.
Comments received on or before the
closing date will be carefully
considered. Comments received after
that date will be given the same
consideration if it is practical to do so,
but assurance of consideration cannot
be given except as to comments received
on or before the closing date.
B. Confidentiality
Comments, whether submitted
electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at ATF, and
on the Internet as part of the President’s
eRulemaking initiative, and are subject
to the Freedom of Information Act.
Commenters who do not want their
name or other personal identifying
information posted on the Internet
should submit their comment by mail or
facsimile, along with a separate cover
sheet that contains their personal
identifying information. Both the cover
sheet and comment must reference this
docket number. Information contained
in the cover sheet will not be posted on
the Internet. Any personal identifying
information that appears within the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1877
comment will be posted on the Internet
and will not be redacted by ATF.
Any material that the commenter
considers to be inappropriate for
disclosure to the public should not be
included in the comment. Any person
submitting a comment shall specifically
designate that portion (if any) of his
comments that contains material that is
confidential under law (e.g., trade
secrets, processes, etc.). Any portion of
a comment that is confidential under
law shall be set forth on pages separate
from the balance of the comment and
shall be prominently marked
‘‘confidential’’ at the top of each page.
Confidential information will be
included in the rulemaking record but
will not be disclosed to the public. Any
comments containing material that is
not confidential under law may be
disclosed to the public. In any event, the
name of the person submitting a
comment is not exempt from disclosure.
C. Submitting Comments
Comments may be submitted in any of
three ways:
• Mail: Send written comments to the
address listed in the ADDRESSES section
of this document. Written comments
must be signed and may be of any
length.
• Facsimile: You may submit
comments by facsimile transmission to
(202) 648–9741. Faxed comments must:
(1) Be legible;
(2) Be on 81⁄2″ x 11″ paper;
(3) Contain a legible, written
signature; and
(4) Be no more than five pages long.
ATF will not accept faxed comments
that exceed five pages.
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: To
submit comments to ATF via the
Federal e-rulemaking portal, visit https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
D. Request for Hearing
Any interested person who desires an
opportunity to comment orally at a
public hearing should submit his or her
request, in writing, to the Director of
ATF within the 90-day comment period.
The Director, however, reserves the
right to determine, in light of all
circumstances, whether a public hearing
is necessary.
Disclosure
Copies of this interim rule and the
comments received will be available for
public inspection by appointment
during normal business hours at: ATF
Reading Room, Room 1E–063, 99 New
York Avenue, NE., Washington, DC
20226; telephone: (202) 648–7080.
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
1878
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Drafting Information
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
The author of this document is James
P. Ficaretta; Enforcement Programs and
Services; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives.
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms,
and Explosives
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 478
[Docket No. ATF 10F; AG Order No. 3032–
2009]
Administrative practice and
procedure, Arms and ammunition,
Authority delegations, Customs duties
and inspection, Domestic violence,
Exports, Imports, Law enforcement
personnel, Military personnel, Penalties,
Reporting requirements, Research,
Seizures and forfeitures, and
Transportation.
Authority and Issuance
Accordingly, for the reasons discussed
in the preamble, 27 CFR part 478 is
amended as follows:
■
PART 478—COMMERCE IN FIREARMS
AND AMMUNITION
1. The authority citation for 27 CFR
part 478 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 18 U.S.C. 847,
921–931; 44 U.S.C. 3504(h).
§ 478.71
[Amended]
2. Section 478.71 is amended by
removing ‘‘of Industry Operations’’ in
the first sentence.
■
§ 478.72
[Amended]
3. Section 478.72 is amended by
removing ‘‘of Industry Operations’’ in
the fifth sentence and by removing
‘‘Director of Industry Operations’’ in the
sixth sentence and adding in its place
‘‘Director’s’’.
■
§ 478.73
[Amended]
4. Section 478.73 is amended by
removing ‘‘of Industry Operations’’
wherever it appears.
■
§ 478.74
[Amended]
5. Section 478.74 is amended by
removing ‘‘of Industry Operations’’ in
the fourth sentence.
■
§ 478.76
[Amended]
6. Section 478.76 is amended by
removing ‘‘of Industry Operations’’
wherever it appears.
■
§ 478.78
[Amended]
7. Section 478.78 is amended by
removing ‘‘of Industry Operations’’ in
the last sentence.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
■
Dated: January 7, 2009.
Michael B. Mukasey,
Attorney General.
[FR Doc. E9–527 Filed 1–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
22:13 Jan 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
27 CFR Part 555
RIN 1140–AA24
Commerce in Explosives—Amended
Definition of ‘‘Propellant Actuated
Device’’ (2004R–3P)
AGENCY: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives, Department of
Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Department of Justice is
amending the regulations of the Bureau
of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
Explosives (‘‘ATF’’) to clarify that the
term ‘‘propellant actuated device’’ does
not include hobby rocket motors or
rocket-motor reload kits consisting of or
containing ammonium perchlorate
composite propellant (‘‘APCP’’), black
powder, or other similar low explosives.
DATES: This rule is effective February
13, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James P. Ficaretta; Enforcement
Programs and Services; Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
Explosives; U.S. Department of Justice;
99 New York Avenue, NE., Washington,
DC 20226, telephone: 202–648–7094.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
ATF is responsible for implementing
Title XI of the Organized Crime Control
Act of 1970 (codified at 18 U.S.C. ch.
40) (‘‘Title XI’’). One of the stated
purposes of that Act is to reduce the
hazards to persons and property arising
from misuse and unsafe or insecure
storage of explosive materials. Under
section 847 of title 18, United States
Code, the Attorney General ‘‘may
prescribe such rules and regulations as
he deems reasonably necessary to carry
out the provisions of this chapter.’’
Regulations that implement the
provisions of chapter 40 are contained
in 27 CFR part 555 (‘‘Commerce in
Explosives’’).
Section 841(d) of title 18, United
States Code, sets forth the definition of
‘‘explosives.’’ ‘‘Propellant actuated
devices,’’ along with gasoline,
fertilizers, and propellant actuated
industrial tools manufactured,
imported, or distributed for their
intended purposes, are exempted from
this statutory definition by 27 CFR
555.141(a)(8).
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
When Title XI was enacted by
Congress in 1970, the Judiciary
Committee of the United States House of
Representatives specifically considered
and supported an exception for
propellant actuated devices. H.R. Rep.
No. 91–1549, at 64 (1970), as reprinted
in 1970 U.S.C.C.A.N. 4007, 4041.
Neither the statute nor the legislative
history defines ‘‘propellant actuated
device.’’ In 1981, however, ATF added
the following definition of ‘‘propellant
actuated device’’ to its regulations:
‘‘[a]ny tool or special mechanized
device or gas generator system which is
actuated by a propellant or which
releases and directs work through a
propellant charge.’’ 27 CFR 555.11.
In applying the regulatory definition,
ATF has classified certain products as
propellant actuated devices. These
products include aircraft slide inflation
cartridges, inflatable automobile
occupant restraint systems, nail guns,
and diesel and jet engine starter
cartridges.
II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(‘‘NPRM’’)
On August 11, 2006, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
notice proposing to amend the
regulations of the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives to
clarify that the term ‘‘propellant
actuated device’’ does not include
hobby rocket motors or rocket-motor
reload kits consisting of or containing
ammonium perchlorate composite
propellant, black powder, or other
similar low explosives. See Commerce
in Explosives—Amended Definition of
‘‘Propellant Actuated Device,’’ 71 FR
46174 (Aug. 11, 2006) (‘‘Notice No.
9P’’). ATF engaged in rulemaking with
regard to this issue because on March
19, 2004, the United States District
Court for the District of Columbia found
that ATF has in the past advanced
inconsistent positions regarding the
application of the propellant actuated
device exemption to hobby rocket
motors. ATF issued two related letters
in 1994 that could be interpreted as
taking the position that a fully
assembled rocket motor would be
considered a propellant actuated device
if the rocket motor contained no more
than 62.5 grams (2.2 ounces) of
propellant material and produced less
than 80 newton-seconds (17.92 pound
seconds) of total impulse with thrust
duration not less than 0.050 second.
Prior to assembly, the letters observed,
the propellant, irrespective of the
quantity, would not be exempt as a
propellant actuated device.
The 1994 letters are confusing in that
they can be interpreted to intertwine the
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1875-1878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-527]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
27 CFR Part 478
[Docket No. ATF 27P; AG Order No. 3030-2009]
Decision-Making Authority Regarding the Denial, Suspension, or
Revocation of a Federal Firearms License, or Imposition of a Civil Fine
(2008R-10P)
AGENCY: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF),
Department of Justice.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Justice is amending the regulations of the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (``ATF'') to
delegate to the Director of ATF the authority to serve as the deciding
official regarding the denial, suspension, or revocation of federal
firearms licenses, or the imposition of a civil fine. The Director will
have the flexibility to delegate to another ATF official the authority
to decide a revocation or denial matter, or may exercise that authority
himself. Such flexibility will allow ATF to more efficiently decide
denial, suspension, and revocation hearings and also whether to impose
a civil fine, because the Director can redelegate to Headquarters
officials, field officials, or some combination thereof, authority to
take action as the final agency decision maker. This will give the
agency the ability to ensure consistency in decision making and to
address any case backlogs that may occur.
The interim rule will remain in effect until superseded by final
regulations.
DATES: Effective Date: This interim rule is effective January 14, 2009.
Comment date: Written comments must be postmarked and electronic
comments must be submitted on or before April 14, 2009. Commenters
should be aware that the electronic Federal Docket Management System
will not accept comments after Midnight Eastern Time on the last day of
the comment period.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to any of the following addresses--
James P. Ficaretta, Program Manager, Room 6N-602, Bureau
of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, P.O. Box 50221,
Washington, DC 20091-0221; ATTN: ATF 27P. Written comments must include
your mailing address and be signed, and may be of any length.
202-648-9741 (facsimile).
https://www.regulations.gov. Federal e-rulemaking portal;
follow the instructions for submitting comments.
You may also view an electronic version of this rule at the https://
www.regulations.gov site.
See the Public Participation section at the end of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for instructions and requirements for
submitting comments, and for information on how to request a public
hearing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James P. Ficaretta, Enforcement
Programs and Services, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
Explosives, U.S. Department of Justice, 99 New York Avenue, NE.,
Washington, DC 20226; telephone: (202) 648-7094.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Attorney General is responsible for enforcing the provisions of
the Gun Control Act of 1968 (``the Act''), 18 U.S.C. Chapter 44. He has
delegated that responsibility to the Director of ATF, subject to the
direction of the Attorney General and the Deputy Attorney General. 28
CFR 0.130(a). ATF has promulgated regulations that implement the
provisions of the Act in 27 CFR Part 478.
The regulations in Subpart E of Part 478, Sec. Sec. 478.71-78,
relate to proceedings involving federal firearms licenses, including
the denial, suspension, and revocation of a license, and the imposition
of a civil fine. Section 478.71 provides that whenever the Director of
Industry Operations (``DIO'') has reason to believe that an applicant
is not qualified to receive a license under the provisions of Sec.
478.47, he may issue a notice of denial, on ATF Form 4498, to the
applicant. The notice will set forth the matters of fact and law relied
upon in determining that the application should be denied, and will
afford the applicant 15 days from the date of receipt of the notice in
which to request a hearing to review the denial. If no request for a
hearing is filed within such time, the application will be disapproved
and a copy, so marked, will be returned to the applicant.
Under Sec. 478.72, an applicant who has been denied an original or
renewal license can file a request with the DIO for a hearing to review
the denial of the application. On conclusion of the hearing and after
consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances presented by the
applicant or his representative, the DIO renders a decision confirming
or reversing the denial of the application. If the decision is that the
denial should stand, a
[[Page 1876]]
certified copy of the DIO's findings and conclusions are furnished to
the applicant with a final notice of denial, ATF Form 4501. In
addition, a copy of the application, marked ``Disapproved,'' is
furnished to the applicant. If the decision is that the license applied
for should be issued, the applicant will be so notified, in writing,
and the license will be issued.
Section 478.73 provides that whenever the DIO has reason to believe
that a firearms licensee has willfully violated any provision of the
Act or part 478, a notice of revocation of the license (ATF Form 4500),
may be issued. In addition, a notice of revocation, suspension, or
imposition of a civil fine may be issued on Form 4500 whenever the DIO
has reason to believe that a licensee has knowingly transferred a
firearm to an unlicensed person and knowingly failed to comply with the
requirements of section 922(t)(1), relating to a NICS (National Instant
Criminal Background Check System) background check.
As specified in Sec. 478.74, a licensee who received a notice of
suspension or revocation of a license, or imposition of a civil fine,
may file a request for a hearing with the DIO. On conclusion of the
hearing and after consideration of all the relevant presentations made
by the licensee or the licensee's representative, the DIO renders a
decision and prepares a brief summary of the findings and conclusions
on which the decision was based. If the decision is that the license
should be revoked or, in actions under section 922(t)(5), that the
license should be revoked or suspended, and/or that a civil fine should
be imposed, a certified copy of the summary is furnished to the
licensee with the final notice of revocation, suspension, or imposition
of a civil fine on ATF Form 4501. If the decision is that the license
should not be revoked, or in actions under section 922(t)(5), that the
license should not be revoked or suspended, and a civil fine should not
be imposed, the licensee will be notified in writing.
Under Sec. 478.76, an applicant or licensee may be represented by
an attorney, certified public accountant, or other person recognized to
practice before ATF, provided certain requirements are met. The DIO may
be represented in proceedings by an attorney in the office of the
Assistant Chief Counsel or Division Counsel who is authorized to
execute and file motions, briefs and other papers in the proceeding, on
behalf of the DIO, in his own name as ``Attorney for the Government.''
Section 478.78 provides that if a licensee is dissatisfied with a
post-hearing decision revoking or suspending the license or denying the
application or imposing a civil fine, as the case may be, he may file a
petition for judicial review of such action. In such case, when the DIO
finds that justice so requires, he may postpone the effective date of
suspension or revocation of a license or authorize continued operations
under the expired license, as applicable, pending judicial review.
II. Interim Rule
As indicated above, at present ATF's regulations name the DIO as
the deciding official in matters dealing with the denial of an original
or renewal firearms license, the suspension or revocation of a license,
and the imposition of a civil fine. This interim rule amends the
regulations to redesignate the Director as the deciding official. ATF
believes that delegating the final authority with respect to those
matters to the Director is necessary and proper. ATF further believes
that the Director should be able to redelegate this authority to the
DIO or any other agency official through issuance of a delegation
order, not through regulation. This is consistent with other
regulations in part 478. For example, Sec. 478.144 provides that the
Director is the deciding authority with respect to applications for
relief from firearms disabilities. Pursuant to ATF Order 1120.4 (69 FR
55462, September 14, 2004), the authority to make determinations on
applications for relief from federal firearms disabilities was
delegated to the Assistant Director (Enforcement Programs and
Services).
ATF believes that it is appropriate for the Director to have more
flexibility to change the delegation of authority to decide a hearing
regarding denial, suspension, or revocation of a federal firearms
license, and a hearing regarding imposition of a civil fine, or to
exercise that authority himself. Such flexibility will allow ATF to
more efficiently decide revocation and denial hearings, because the
Director can designate Headquarters officials, field officials, or some
combination thereof, as the final agency decision maker. That
flexibility will give the agency the ability to ensure consistency in
decision making and to address any case backlogs that may occur.
How This Document Complies With the Federal Administrative Requirements
for Rulemaking
A. Executive Order 12866
The Attorney General has determined that this rule is not a
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, section
3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review. This rule will not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million, nor will it adversely affect in
a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, public health, or safety, or State,
local or tribal governments or communities.
This is a rule of agency organization, procedure, and practice. It
merely redesignates the Director as the deciding official with respect
to the denial, suspension, or revocation of a federal firearms license
and the imposition of a civil fine.
B. Executive Order 13132
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the federal Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6
of Executive Order 13132, the Attorney General has determined that this
regulation will not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant
the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement.
C. Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable standards set forth in
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform.
D. Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
Notice and comment rulemaking is not required for this interim
final rule. Under the APA, ``rules of agency organization, procedure or
practice,'' 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(A), that do not ``affect[ ] individual
rights and obligations,'' Morton v. Ruiz, 415 U.S. 199, 232 (1974), are
exempt from the general notice and comment requirements of section 553.
See JEM Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 22 F.3d 320, 326 (D.C. Cir. 1994)
(section 553(b)(3)(A) applies to ``agency actions that do not
themselves alter the rights or interests of parties, although [they]
may alter the manner in which the parties present themselves or their
viewpoints to the agency''). The revisions to the regulations in
Sec. Sec. 478.71-78 are purely matters of agency organization,
procedure, and practice. The interim final rule will not affect
substantive rights or interests of federal firearms licensees or
applicants for federal firearms licensees. Nevertheless, ATF welcomes
public comments on the interim final rule.
Furthermore, there is good cause for finding that the interim final
rule is exempt from the effective date
[[Page 1877]]
limitation of section 553(d). The interim final rule will grant the
Director more flexibility to change the delegation of authority to
decide a hearing regarding denial, suspension, or revocation of a
federal firearms license, and a hearing regarding imposition of a civil
fine, or to exercise that authority himself. Such flexibility will
allow ATF to more efficiently decide revocation and denial hearings,
because the Director can designate Headquarters officials, field
officials, or some combination thereof, as the final agency decision
maker. This will enable the Director to ensure consistency in decision
making and to address any case backlogs that may occur.
There is no reason to defer these benefits for thirty days. The
interim final rule will not alter the rights or obligations of third
parties, although it may alter the manner in which those parties
present themselves or their viewpoints to the agency. No matter how the
Director delegates his authority to revoke or deny federal firearms
licenses pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 923(e), persons who apply for or hold
federal firearms licenses will still have a right to due process during
the agency administrative proceeding, including a right to a hearing
(18 U.S.C. 923(f)(2)), a right to a written notice from the agency
specifying the grounds for denial or revocation (18 U.S.C. 923(f)(3)),
and a right to judicial review (18 U.S.C. 923(f)(3)). Therefore, there
is good cause to make the interim final rule effective immediately.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., requires an
agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject
to notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency
certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. See 5 U.S.C. 605(b). As noted
above, this rule is not subject to notice and comment rulemaking
requirements. Id. 553(b)(A). This is a rule of agency organization,
procedure, and practice. It merely delegates to the Director the
authority to make decisions with respect to the denial, suspension,
imposition of a civil fine, or revocation of federal firearms licenses.
F. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 251 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C.
804. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and
export markets.
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100
million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
H. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new reporting or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Public Participation
A. Comments Sought
ATF is requesting comments on the interim final rule from all
interested persons. ATF is also specifically requesting comments on the
clarity of this interim final rule and how it may be made easier to
understand.
All comments must reference this document docket number (ATF 27P),
be legible, and include your name and mailing address. ATF will treat
all comments as originals and will not acknowledge receipt of comments.
Comments received on or before the closing date will be carefully
considered. Comments received after that date will be given the same
consideration if it is practical to do so, but assurance of
consideration cannot be given except as to comments received on or
before the closing date.
B. Confidentiality
Comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be
made available for public viewing at ATF, and on the Internet as part
of the President's eRulemaking initiative, and are subject to the
Freedom of Information Act. Commenters who do not want their name or
other personal identifying information posted on the Internet should
submit their comment by mail or facsimile, along with a separate cover
sheet that contains their personal identifying information. Both the
cover sheet and comment must reference this docket number. Information
contained in the cover sheet will not be posted on the Internet. Any
personal identifying information that appears within the comment will
be posted on the Internet and will not be redacted by ATF.
Any material that the commenter considers to be inappropriate for
disclosure to the public should not be included in the comment. Any
person submitting a comment shall specifically designate that portion
(if any) of his comments that contains material that is confidential
under law (e.g., trade secrets, processes, etc.). Any portion of a
comment that is confidential under law shall be set forth on pages
separate from the balance of the comment and shall be prominently
marked ``confidential'' at the top of each page. Confidential
information will be included in the rulemaking record but will not be
disclosed to the public. Any comments containing material that is not
confidential under law may be disclosed to the public. In any event,
the name of the person submitting a comment is not exempt from
disclosure.
C. Submitting Comments
Comments may be submitted in any of three ways:
Mail: Send written comments to the address listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. Written comments must be signed and
may be of any length.
Facsimile: You may submit comments by facsimile
transmission to (202) 648-9741. Faxed comments must:
(1) Be legible;
(2) Be on 8\1/2\ x 11 paper;
(3) Contain a legible, written signature; and
(4) Be no more than five pages long. ATF will not accept faxed
comments that exceed five pages.
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: To submit comments to ATF via
the Federal e-rulemaking portal, visit https://www.regulations.gov and
follow the instructions for submitting comments.
D. Request for Hearing
Any interested person who desires an opportunity to comment orally
at a public hearing should submit his or her request, in writing, to
the Director of ATF within the 90-day comment period. The Director,
however, reserves the right to determine, in light of all
circumstances, whether a public hearing is necessary.
Disclosure
Copies of this interim rule and the comments received will be
available for public inspection by appointment during normal business
hours at: ATF Reading Room, Room 1E-063, 99 New York Avenue, NE.,
Washington, DC 20226; telephone: (202) 648-7080.
[[Page 1878]]
Drafting Information
The author of this document is James P. Ficaretta; Enforcement
Programs and Services; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
Explosives.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 478
Administrative practice and procedure, Arms and ammunition,
Authority delegations, Customs duties and inspection, Domestic
violence, Exports, Imports, Law enforcement personnel, Military
personnel, Penalties, Reporting requirements, Research, Seizures and
forfeitures, and Transportation.
Authority and Issuance
0
Accordingly, for the reasons discussed in the preamble, 27 CFR part 478
is amended as follows:
PART 478--COMMERCE IN FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION
0
1. The authority citation for 27 CFR part 478 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 18 U.S.C. 847, 921-931; 44 U.S.C.
3504(h).
Sec. 478.71 [Amended]
0
2. Section 478.71 is amended by removing ``of Industry Operations'' in
the first sentence.
Sec. 478.72 [Amended]
0
3. Section 478.72 is amended by removing ``of Industry Operations'' in
the fifth sentence and by removing ``Director of Industry Operations''
in the sixth sentence and adding in its place ``Director's''.
Sec. 478.73 [Amended]
0
4. Section 478.73 is amended by removing ``of Industry Operations''
wherever it appears.
Sec. 478.74 [Amended]
0
5. Section 478.74 is amended by removing ``of Industry Operations'' in
the fourth sentence.
Sec. 478.76 [Amended]
0
6. Section 478.76 is amended by removing ``of Industry Operations''
wherever it appears.
Sec. 478.78 [Amended]
0
7. Section 478.78 is amended by removing ``of Industry Operations'' in
the last sentence.
Dated: January 7, 2009.
Michael B. Mukasey,
Attorney General.
[FR Doc. E9-527 Filed 1-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-FY-P
