Closed Captioning of Video Programming, 1654-1661 [E8-31446]
Download as PDF
1654
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
with the FCC, interested parties should
serve counsel for petitioner as follows:
Gregg P. Skall, Esq., Womble Carlyle
Sandridge & Rice, 1401 Eye Street, NW.,
Seventh Floor, Washington, DC 20005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joyce L. Bernstein,
joyce.bernstein@fcc.gov, Media Bureau,
(202) 418–1600.
This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No.
08–252, adopted December 22, 2008,
and released December 23, 2008. The
full text of this document is available for
public inspection and copying during
normal business hours in the FCC’s
Reference Information Center at Portals
II, CY–A257, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC, 20554. This document
will also be available via ECFS (https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). (Documents
will be available electronically in ASCII,
Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) This
document may be purchased from the
Commission’s duplicating contractor,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1–
800–478–3160 or via e-mail https://
www.BCPIWEB.com. To request this
document in accessible formats
(computer diskettes, large print, audio
recording, and Braille), send an e-mail
to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY). This document does not contain
proposed information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13. In addition, therefore, it does not
contain any proposed information
collection burden ‘‘for small business
concerns with fewer than 25
employees,’’ pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4).
Provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to
this proceeding. Members of the public
should note that from the time a Notice
of Proposed Rule Making is issued until
the matter is no longer subject to
Commission consideration or court
review, all ex parte contacts are
prohibited in Commission proceedings,
such as this one, which involve channel
allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for
rules governing permissible ex parte
contacts.
For information regarding proper
filing procedures for comments, see 47
CFR 1.415 and 1.420.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:05 Jan 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Television, Television broadcasting.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
Part 73 as follows:
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for Part 73
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.
§ 73.622
[Amended]
2. Section 73.622(i), the PostTransition Table of DTV Allotments
under Michigan, is amended by adding
DTV channel 32 and removing DTV
channel 47 at Cadillac.
Federal Communications Commission.
Clay C. Pendarvis,
Associate Chief, Video Division, Media
Bureau.
[FR Doc. E9–509 Filed 1–12–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 79
[CG Docket No. 05–231; FCC 08–255]
Closed Captioning of Video
Programming
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: In this document, the
Commission seeks comment on the
application of the closed captioning
rules to digital broadcasting, specifically
to broadcasters that choose to use their
digital allotment to multicast several
streams of programming. The
Commission’s rules exempt video
programming channels that produced
annual gross revenues of less than $3
million during the previous calendar
year from the Commission’s closed
captioning obligations. The Commission
did not determine what constitutes a
‘‘channel’’ for purposes of satisfying this
self-implementing exemption. The
Commission therefore seeks comment
on issues related to, for purposes of this
exemption, whether each programming
stream on a multicast signal constitutes
a separate channel, or whether the
broadcaster’s entire operations
attributable to its digital allotment
should be considered one channel.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
February 12, 2009. Reply comments are
due on or before February 27, 2009.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may
submit comments identified by CG
Docket No. 05–231, by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the Internet by
accessing the Commission’s Electronic
Comment Filing System (ECFS), through
the Commission’s Web site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/, or the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Filers should
follow the instructions provided on the
Web site for submitting comments. For
ECFS filers, in completing the
transmittal screen, filers should include
their full name, U.S. Postal Service
mailing address, and CG Docket No. 05–
231. Parties also may submit an
electronic comment by Internet e-mail.
To get filing instructions, filers should
send an e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, and
include the following words in the body
of the message, ‘‘get form .’’ A sample form and
directions will be sent in response.
• Paper filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
four copies of each filing. Filings can be
sent by hand or messenger delivery, by
commercial overnight courier, or by
first-class or overnight U.S. Postal
Service mail (although the Commission
continues to experience delays in
receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• The Commission’s contractor will
receive hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary at 236
Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110,
Washington, DC 20002. The filing hours
at this location are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All
hand deliveries must be held together
with rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes must be disposed of before
entering the building.
• Commercial Mail sent by overnight
mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be
sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive,
Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail should be
addressed to 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
• People with Disabilities: To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (Braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202)
418–0432 (TTY).
For detailed instructions for
submitting comments and additional
E:\FR\FM\13JAP1.SGM
13JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
information on the rulemaking process,
see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amelia Brown, Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Disability
Rights Office at (202) 418–2799 or email at Amelia.Brown@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Closed
Captioning of Video Programming;
Closed Captioning Requirements for
Digital Television Receivers, Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (2008 Digital
Closed Captioning NPRM), document
FCC 08–255, adopted November 3,
2008, and released November 7, 2008, in
CG Docket No. 05–231, seeking
comment on matters concerning
§ 79.1(d)(12) of the Commission’s rules
and digital multicast channels. The full
text of FCC 08–255 and copies of any
subsequently filed documents in this
matter will be available for public
inspection and copying during regular
business hours at the FCC Reference
Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. FCC 08–255 and
copies of subsequently filed documents
in this matter may also be purchased
from the Commission’s duplicating
contractor at Portals II, 445 12th Street,
SW., Room CY–B402, Washington, DC
20554. Customers may contact the
Commission’s duplicating contractor at
its Web site, https://www.bcpiweb.com,
or by calling 1–800–378–3160. FCC 08–
255 can also be downloaded in Word or
Portable Document Format (PDF) at:
https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/
caption.html. Parties who choose to file
by paper should also submit their
comments on compact disc. The
compact disc should be submitted,
along with three paper copies, to: Traci
Randolph, Consumer and Governmental
Affairs Bureau, Disability Rights Office,
445 12th Street, SW., Room 3–C425,
Washington, DC 20554. Such
submission should be on a compact disc
formatted in an IBM compatible format
using Word 2003 or a compatible
software. The compact disc should be
accompanied by a cover letter and
should be submitted in ‘‘read only’’
mode. The compact disc should be
clearly labeled with the commenter’s
name, proceeding (CG Docket No. 05–
231), type of pleading (comment or
reply comment), date of submission,
and the name of the electronic file on
the compact disc. The label also should
include the following phrase: ‘‘CD–Rom
Copy—Not an Original.’’ Each compact
disc should contain only one party’s
pleadings, preferably in a single
electronic file. In addition, commenters
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:05 Jan 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
filing by paper must send a compact
disc copy to the Commission’s
duplicating contractor at Portals II, 445
12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554.
Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 Analysis
This document does not contain
proposed information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13. In addition, therefore, it does not
contain any proposed information
collection burden ‘‘for small business
concerns with fewer than 25
employees,’’ pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4).
Synopsis
1. As the nation transitions from
analog to digital broadcasting, the video
programming and broadcasting
landscape will change substantially.
With analog broadcasting, broadcasters
use their spectrum allocation to provide
programming on a single channel. With
digital broadcasting, broadcasters may
use their digital allotment to multicast
several streams of programming, known
as ‘‘multicasting.’’ Section 79.1(d)(12) of
the Commission’s rules exempts video
programming channels that produced
annual gross revenues of less than $3
million during the previous calendar
year from the Commission’s closed
captioning obligations. The Commission
seeks comment on the application of
§ 79.1(d)(12) of the Commission’s rules
to digital broadcasting.
2. In 1997, when the Commission
adopted the exemption for channels
producing less than $3 million in
revenues, it specified that ‘‘[a]nnual
gross revenues shall be calculated for
each channel individually based on
revenues received in the preceding
calendar year from all sources related to
the programming on that channel.’’ The
Commission did not determine,
however, what constitutes a ‘‘channel’’
for purposes of satisfying this selfimplementing exemption. The
Commission seeks comment on
whether, for purposes of § 79.1(d)(12) of
the Commission’s rules, each
programming stream on a multicast
signal constitutes a separate channel, or
whether the broadcaster’s entire
operations attributable to its digital
allotment should be considered one
channel.
3. Under the Commission’s rules,
programming that is already captioned
and delivered to a broadcaster for airing
must be aired with the captions intact,
regardless of the multicast stream on
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1655
which the programming airs, pursuant
to the pass through rule. Given the pass
through rule, it is likely that much of
the programming delivered to
broadcasters for airing on multicast
streams will already be captioned,
especially if it is programming provided
by a network programmer, even if
§ 79.1(d)(12) of the Commission’s rules
applies to each multicast channel. The
Commission seeks comment on what
percentage of programming that airs on
multicast streams, other than the main
stream, is network programming, and
how much of that programming is
already captioned.
4. The Commission seeks comment on
whether individual programming
streams should not be considered
separate channels for purposes of
calculating revenues for purposes of
§ 79.1(d)(12) of the Commission’s rules.
In such circumstances, digital
broadcasters would be exempt from the
Commission’s requirements under
§ 79.1(d)(12) of the Commission’s rules
only if their overall operations, taking
into account all activities on all
‘‘streams,’’ received less than $3 million
in revenues. The Commission seeks
comment on the relative merits of this
approach and its practical effects,
including how this determination might
affect program diversity, the airing of
locally-originated programming, or the
airing of other kinds of programming
that may afford little or no economic
return. The Commission also seeks
comment on whether this approach may
result in an increase in the number of
petitions for exemption from the closed
captioning requirements under the
‘‘undue burden’’ standard set forth in
§ 79.1(f) of the Commission’s rules.
5. The Commission seeks comment on
whether the $3 million revenue amount
is a reasonable threshold for
determining if secondary multicast
streams should be exempt from the
closed captioning requirements, or
whether a smaller figure is appropriate
and, if so, what that amount should be.
6. The Commission seeks comment on
whether it is appropriate to adopt
something other than a fixed revenue
threshold for determining whether
secondary multicast streams must be
captioned. For example, comment is
sought on whether the captioning
requirements should be tied to a
formula that considers the number of
programming streams being offered (or
some other variable), such as that used
for determining a multicasting
broadcaster’s children’s television
programming requirements. Finally, the
Commission seeks comment on similar
alternatives for applying captioning
E:\FR\FM\13JAP1.SGM
13JAP1
1656
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
requirements to multicast program
streams.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Certification
7. As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended
(RFA), the Commission has prepared
this present Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the
possible significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities by
the policies and rules proposed in this
2008 Digital Closed Captioning NPRM.
See 5 U.S.C. 603. Written public
comments are requested on this IRFA.
Comments must be identified as
responses to the IRFA and must be filed
by the deadlines for comments on the
2008 Digital Closed Captioning NPRM
provided in paragraph 43 of the Item.
The Commission will send a copy of the
2008 Digital Closed Captioning NPRM,
including this IRFA, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration (SBA). See 5
U.S.C. 603(a).
Need for, and Objectives of, the
Proposed Rules
8. The Commission initiates this
review relating to closed captioning in
anticipation of the transition to digital
television (DTV) by full power
broadcasters, which will occur on
February 18, 2009. This rulemaking
proceeding proposes several options for
the appropriate treatment of digital
broadcasters that choose to use their
digital allotment to multicast several
streams of programming (known as
‘‘multicasting’’). In light of this new
broadcasting environment, the 2008
Digital Closed Captioning NPRM
proposes several options for
determining the closed captioning
obligations for multicasting
broadcasters. The 2008 Digital Closed
Captioning NPRM seeks comment on
§ 79.1(d)(12) of the Commission’s rules,
which exempts from the closed
captioning obligations video
programming channels that produced
annual gross revenues of less than $3
million during the previous calendar
year. 47 CFR 79.1(d)(12). In order to
determine whether each stream of a
digital broadcaster’s multicast operation
must be captioned, the Commission
proposes several possible alternatives
and the possible outcomes to each
alternative.
9. The proposals set forth in the 2008
Digital Closed Captioning NPRM, for
which comment is sought, contemplate
as possible outcomes the following:
Treat each multicast stream as a
separate channel and calculate their
revenues separately; treat each multicast
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:05 Jan 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
stream as a separate channel and
calculate their revenues separately, but
decrease the revenue threshold for
determining whether the non-main
programming streams must close
caption; treat individual programming
streams as one channel, in which case
the revenues would be aggregated for
purposes of determining if the
exemption in § 79.1(d)(12) of the
Commission’s rules applies; or, impose
a new non-revenue approach for
deciding how much programming must
be captioned on multicast streams.
Legal Basis
10. The authority for this proposed
rulemaking is contained in sections 4(i),
303(r) and 713 of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
154(i), 303(r) and 613.
Description and Estimate of the Number
of Small Entities Impacted
11. The RFA directs the Commission
to provide a description of and, where
feasible, an estimate of the number of
small entities that will be affected by the
rules. 5 U.S.C. 604(a)(3). The RFA
generally defines the term ‘‘small
entity’’ as having the same meaning as
the terms ‘‘small business,’’ ‘‘small
organization,’’ and ‘‘small business
concern’’ under section 3 of the Small
Business Act. 5 U.S.C. 601(6). Under the
Small Business Act, a small business
concern is one which: (1) Is
independently owned and operated; (2)
is not dominant in its field of operation;
and (3) satisfies any additional criteria
established by the SBA. 5 U.S.C. 632.
12. Nationwide, there are a total of
approximately 22.4 million small
businesses, according to SBA data. See
SBA, Programs and Services, SBA
Pamphlet No. CO–0028, at page 40 (July
2002). A ‘‘small organization’’ is
generally ‘‘any not-for-profit enterprise
which is independently owned and
operated and is not dominant in its
field.’’ 5 U.S.C. 601(4). Nationwide, as
of 2002, there were approximately 1.6
million small organizations.
‘‘Independent Sector, The New
Nonprofit Almanac & Desk Reference’’
(2002). The term ‘‘small governmental
jurisdiction’’ is defined generally as
‘‘governments of cities, towns,
townships, villages, school districts, or
special districts, with a population of
less than fifty thousand.’’ 5 U.S.C.
601(5). Census Bureau data for 2002
indicate that there were 87,525 local
governmental jurisdictions in the
United States. U.S. Census Bureau,
‘‘Statistical Abstract of the United
States: 2006,’’ section 8, page 272, Table
415. The Commission estimates that, of
this total, 84,377 entities were ‘‘small
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
governmental jurisdictions.’’ The
Commission assumes that the villages,
school districts, and special districts are
small, and total 48,558. For 2002,
Census Bureau data indicate that the
total number of county, municipal, and
township governments nationwide was
38,967, of which 35,819 were small. See
U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract
of the United States: 2006, section 8,
page 273, Table 417. Thus, the
Commission estimates that most
governmental jurisdictions are small.
13. Wired Telecommunications
Carriers. The Census Bureau defines
this category as follows: ‘‘This industry
comprises establishments primarily
engaged as third-party distribution
systems for broadcast programming. The
establishments of this industry deliver
visual, aural, or textual programming
received from cable networks, local
television stations, or radio networks to
consumers via cable or direct-to-home
satellite systems on a subscription or fee
basis. These establishments do not
generally originate programming
material.’’ U.S. Census Bureau, 2002
NAICS Definitions, ‘‘517110 Wired
Telecommunications Carriers.’’ The
SBA has developed a small business
size standard for wireline firms within
the broad economic census category,
‘‘Wired Telecommunications Carriers.’’
13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110.
Under this category, the SBA deems a
wireline business to be small if it has
1,500 or fewer employees. Census
Bureau data for 2002 show that there
were 2,432 firms in this category that
operated for the entire year. U.S. Census
Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject
Series: Information, ‘‘Establishment and
Firm Size: 2002 (Including Legal Form
of Organization),’’ Table 5, NAICS code
517110 (issued Nov. 2005). Of this total,
2,395 firms had employment of 999 or
fewer employees, and 37 firms had
employment of 1,000 employees or
more. U.S. Census Bureau, 2002
Economic Census, Subject Series:
Information, ‘‘Establishment and Firm
Size: 2002 (Including Legal Form of
Organization),’’ Table 5, NAICS code
517110 (issued Nov. 2005). Thus, under
this category and associated small
business size standard, the majority of
firms can be considered small.
14. Cable Television Distribution
Services. Since 2007, these services
have been defined within the broad
economic census category of Wired
Telecommunications Carriers; that
category is defined as follows: ‘‘This
industry comprises establishments
primarily engaged in operating and/or
providing access to transmission
facilities and infrastructure that they
own and/or lease for the transmission of
E:\FR\FM\13JAP1.SGM
13JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
voice, data, text, sound, and video using
wired telecommunications networks.
Transmission facilities may be based on
a single technology or a combination of
technologies.’’ U.S. Census Bureau,
2007 NAICS Definitions, ‘‘517110 Wired
Telecommunications Carriers’’ (partial
definition. The SBA has developed a
small business size standard for this
category, which is: all such firms having
1,500 or fewer employees. The NAICS
Code associated with this size standard
is 517110. To gauge small business
prevalence for these cable services we
must, however, use current census data
that are based on the previous category
of Cable and Other Program Distribution
and its associated size standard; that
size standard was: all such firms having
$13.5 million or less in annual receipts.
13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110.
According to Census Bureau data for
2002, there were a total of 1,191 firms
in this previous category that operated
for the entire year. U.S. Census Bureau,
2002 Economic Census, Subject Series:
Information, Table 4, Receipts Size of
Firms for the United States: 2002,
NAICS code 517510 (issued November
2005). Of this total, 1,087 firms had
annual receipts of under $10 million,
and 43 firms had receipts of $10 million
or more but less than $25 million. Thus,
the majority of these firms can be
considered small.
15. Cable Companies and Systems.
The Commission has also developed its
own small business size standards, for
the purpose of cable rate regulation.
Under the Commission’s rules, a ‘‘small
cable company’’ is one serving 400,000
or fewer subscribers, nationwide. 47
CFR 76.901(e) of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission determined that
this size standard equates
approximately to a size standard of $100
million or less in annual revenues.
Implementation of Sections of the 1992
Cable Act: Rate Regulation, Sixth Report
and Order and Eleventh Order on
Reconsideration, 10 FCC Rcd 7393, 7408
(1995), published at 60 FR 35854, July
12, 1995. Industry data indicate that, of
1,076 cable operators nationwide, all
but eleven are small under this size
standard. These data are derived from:
R.R. Bowker, Broadcasting & Cable
Yearbook 2006, ‘‘Top 25 Cable/Satellite
Operators,’’ pages A–8 & C–2 (data
current as of June 30, 2005); Warren
Communications News, Television &
Cable Factbook 2006, ‘‘Ownership of
Cable Systems in the United States,’’
pages D–1805 to D–1857. In addition,
under the Commission’s rules, a ‘‘small
system’’ is a cable system serving 15,000
or fewer subscribers. 47 CFR 76.901(c)
of the Commission’s rules. Industry data
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:05 Jan 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
indicate that, of 7,208 systems
nationwide, 6,139 systems have under
10,000 subscribers, and an additional
379 systems have 10,000–19,999
subscribers. Warren Communications
News, Television & Cable Factbook
2006, ‘‘U.S. Cable Systems by
Subscriber Size,’’ page F–2 (data current
as of Oct. 2005). The data do not include
718 systems for which classifying data
were not available. Thus, under this
second size standard, most cable
systems are small. Wired
Telecommunications Carriers with
fewer than 1,500 employees are
considered to be small. See 13 CFR
121.201, NAICS code 517110.
16. Cable System Operators. The
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, also contains a size standard
for small cable system operators, which
is ‘‘a cable operator that, directly or
through an affiliate, serves in the
aggregate fewer than 1 percent of all
subscribers in the United States and is
not affiliated with any entity or entities
whose gross annual revenues in the
aggregate exceed $250,000,000.’’ 47
U.S.C. 543(m)(2); see 47 CFR 6.901(f) of
the Commission’s rules and notes 1–3.
The Commission has determined that an
operator serving fewer than 677,000
subscribers shall be deemed a small
operator, if its annual revenues, when
combined with the total annual
revenues of all its affiliates, do not
exceed $250 million in the aggregate. 47
CFR 76.901(f) of the Commission’s
rules; see Public Notice, FCC
Announces New Subscriber Count for
the Definition of Small Cable Operator,
DA 01–158 (Cable Services Bureau,
January 24, 2001). Industry data indicate
that, of 1,076 cable operators
nationwide, all but ten are small under
this size standard. These data are
derived from: R.R. Bowker,
Broadcasting & Cable Yearbook 2006,
‘‘Top 25 Cable/Satellite Operators,’’
pages A–8 & C–2 (data current as of June
30, 2005); Warren Communications
News, Television & Cable Factbook
2006, ‘‘Ownership of Cable Systems in
the United States,’’ pages D–1805 to D–
1857. The Commission notes that the
Commission neither requests nor
collects information on whether cable
system operators are affiliated with
entities whose gross annual revenues
exceed $250 million, and therefore the
Commission is unable to estimate more
accurately the number of cable system
operators that would qualify as small
under this size standard. The
Commission does receive such
information on a case-by-case basis if a
cable operator appeals a local franchise
authority’s finding that the operator
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1657
does not qualify as a small cable
operator pursuant to section 76.901(f) of
the Commission’s rules. See 47 CFR
76.909(b) of the Commission’s rules.
17. Cable Television Relay Service.
This service includes transmitters
generally used to relay cable
programming within cable television
system distribution systems. As noted,
Wired Telecommunications Carriers
with fewer than 1,500 employees are
considered to be small, under the
currently applicable SBA classification.
NAICS Code 517110. The data
presented were acquired when the
applicable SBA small business size
standard was called Cable and Other
Program Distribution, and which
referred to all such firms having $13.5
million or less in annual receipts. 13
CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110.
According to Census Bureau data for
2002, there were a total of 1,191 firms
in this category that operated for the
entire year. U.S. Census Bureau, 2002
Economic Census, Subject Series:
Information, Table 4, Receipts Size of
Firms for the United States: 2002,
NAICS code 517510 (issued November
2005). Of this total, 1,087 firms had
annual receipts of under $10 million,
and 43 firms had receipts of $10 million
or more but less than $25 million. U.S.
Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census,
Subject Series: Information, Table 4,
Receipts Size of Firms for the United
States: 2002, NAICS code 517510
(issued November 2005). Thus, under
this size standard, the majority of firms
can be considered small.
18. Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS)
Service. DBS service is a nationally
distributed subscription service that
delivers video and audio programming
via satellite to a small parabolic ‘‘dish’’
antenna at the subscriber’s location.
DBS falls under the SBA definition of
‘‘Wireless Telecommunications Carriers
(except satellite)’’, which establishes as
a small DBS company any DBS
company which has less than 1,500
employees. 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS
Code 517210. The data presented were
acquired when the applicable SBA
small business size standard was called
Cable and Other Program Distribution,
and which referred to all such firms
having $13.5 million or less in annual
receipts. 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code
517110. According to Census Bureau
data for 2002, there were a total of 1,191
firms in this category that operated for
the entire year. U.S. Census Bureau,
2002 Economic Census, Subject Series:
Information, Table 4, Receipts Size of
Firms for the United States: 2002,
NAICS code 517510 (issued November
2005). Of this total, 1,087 firms had
annual receipts of under $10 million,
E:\FR\FM\13JAP1.SGM
13JAP1
1658
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
and 43 firms had receipts of $10 million
or more but less than $25 million.
Currently, only four operators hold
licenses to provide DBS service, which
requires a great investment of capital for
operation. All four currently offer
subscription services. Two of these four
DBS operators, DirecTV and EchoStar
Communications Corporation
(EchoStar), report annual revenues that
are in excess of the threshold for a small
business. DirecTV is the largest DBS
operator and the second largest MVPD,
serving an estimated 13.04 million
subscribers nationwide. See Annual
Assessment of Status of Competition in
the Market for the Delivery of Video
Programming, Eleventh Annual Report,
FCC 05–13, paragraph 55 (released
February 4, 2005) (2005 Cable
Competition Report). EchoStar, which
provides service under the brand name
Dish Network, is the second largest DBS
operator and the fourth largest MVPD,
serving an estimated 10.12 million
subscribers nationwide. See 2005 Cable
Competition Report, paragraph 55. A
third operator, Rainbow DBS, is a
subsidiary of Cablevision’s Rainbow
Network, which also reports annual
revenues in excess of $13.5 million, and
thus does not qualify as a small
business. Rainbow DBS, which provides
service under the brand name VOOM,
reported an estimated 25,000
subscribers. See 2005 Cable Competition
Report, paragraph 55. The fourth DBS
operator, Dominion Video Satellite, Inc.
(Dominion), offers religious (Christian)
programming and does not report its
annual receipts. Dominion, which
provides service under the brand name
Sky Angel, does not publicly disclose its
subscribership numbers on an
annualized basis. See 2005 Cable
Competition Report, paragraph 55. The
Commission does not know of any
source which provides this information
and, thus, the Commission has no way
of confirming whether Dominion
qualifies as a small business. Because
DBS service requires significant capital,
the Commission believes it is unlikely
that a small entity as defined by the
SBA would have the financial
wherewithal to become a DBS licensee.
Nevertheless, given the absence of
specific data on this point, the
Commission acknowledges the
possibility that there are entrants in this
field that may not yet have generated
$13.5 million in annual receipts, and
therefore may be categorized as a small
business, if independently owned and
operated.
19. Television Broadcasting. This
Economic Census category ‘‘comprises
establishments primarily engaged in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:05 Jan 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
broadcasting images together with
sound. These establishments operate
television broadcasting studios and
facilities for the programming and
transmission of programs to the public.’’
U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS
Definitions, ‘‘515120 Television
Broadcasting’’ (partial definition). The
SBA has created the following small
business size standard for Television
Broadcasting firms: those having $14
million or less in annual receipts. 13
CFR 121.201, NAICS code 515120
(updated for inflation in 2008). The
Commission has estimated the number
of licensed commercial television
stations to be 1,379. See FCC News
Release, ‘‘Broadcast Station Totals as of
December 31, 2007,’’ dated March 18,
2008. In addition, according to
Commission staff review of the BIA
Publications, Inc., Master Access
Television Analyzer Database (BIA) on
March 30, 2007, about 986 of an
estimated 1,374 commercial television
stations (or approximately 72 percent)
had revenues of $13 million or less. The
Commission recognizes that BIA’s
estimate differs slightly from the FCC
total. The Commission therefore
estimates that the majority of
commercial television broadcasters are
small entities.
20. The Commission notes, however,
that in assessing whether a business
concern qualifies as small under the
above definition, business (control)
affiliations must be included. 13 CFR
21.103(a)(1). The Commission’s
estimate, therefore, likely overstates the
number of small entities that might be
affected by our action, because the
revenue figure on which it is based does
not include or aggregate revenues from
affiliated companies. In addition, an
element of the definition of ‘‘small
business’’ is that the entity not be
dominant in its field of operation. The
Commission is unable at this time to
define or quantify the criteria that
would establish whether a specific
television station is dominant in its field
of operation. Accordingly, the estimate
of small businesses to which rules may
apply does not exclude any television
station from the definition of a small
business on this basis and is therefore
possibly over-inclusive to that extent.
21. In addition, the Commission has
estimated the number of licensed
noncommercial educational (NCE)
television stations to be 380. See FCC
News Release, ‘‘Broadcast Station Totals
as of December 31, 2007,’’ dated March
18, 2008. These stations are non-profit,
and therefore considered to be small
entities. See generally 5 U.S.C. 601(4),
(6). In addition, there are also 2,295 low
power television stations (LPTV). See
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FCC News Release, ‘‘Broadcast Station
Totals as of December 31, 2007,’’ dated
March 18, 2008. Given the nature of this
service, we will presume that all LPTV
licensees qualify as small entities under
the above SBA small business size
standard.
22. Local Multipoint Distribution
Service. Local Multipoint Distribution
Service (LMDS) is a fixed broadband
point-to-multipoint microwave service
that provides for two-way video
telecommunications. See Rulemaking to
Amend Parts 1, 2, 21, 25, of the
Commission’s Rules to Redesignate the
27.5–29.5 GHz Frequency Band,
Reallocate the 29.5–30.5 Frequency
Band, to Establish Rules and Policies for
Local Multipoint Distribution Service
and for Fixed Satellite Services, Second
Report and Order, Order on
Reconsideration, and Fifth Notice of
Proposed Rule Making, 12 FCC Rcd
12545, 12689–90, paragraph 348 (1997),
published at 62 FR 16514, April 7, 1997.
The auction of the 986 Local Multipoint
Distribution Service (LMDS) licenses
began on February 18, 1998 and closed
on March 25, 1998. The Commission
established a small business size
standard for LMDS licenses as an entity
that has average gross revenues of less
than $40 million in the three previous
calendar years. See Rulemaking to
Amend Parts 1, 2, 21, 25, of the
Commission’s Rules to Redesignate the
27.5–29.5 GHz Frequency Band,
Reallocate the 29.5–30.5 Frequency
Band, to Establish Rules and Policies for
Local Multipoint Distribution Service
and for Fixed Satellite Services, 12 FCC
Rcd 12545, 12689–90, paragraph 348.
An additional small business size
standard for ‘‘very small business’’ was
added as an entity that, together with its
affiliates, has average gross revenues of
not more than $15 million for the
preceding three calendar years. See
Rulemaking to Amend Parts 1, 2, 21, 25,
of the Commission’s Rules to
Redesignate the 27.5–29.5 GHz
Frequency Band, Reallocate the 29.5–
30.5 Frequency Band, to Establish Rules
and Policies for Local Multipoint
Distribution Service and for Fixed
Satellite Services, 12 FCC Rcd 12545,
12689–90, paragraph 348. The SBA has
approved these small business size
standards in the context of LMDS
auctions. See Letter to Dan Phythyon,
Chief, Wireless Telecommunications
Bureau, FCC, from Aida Alvarez,
Administrator, SBA (January 6, 1998).
There were 93 winning bidders that
qualified as small entities in the LMDS
auctions. A total of 93 small and very
small business bidders won
approximately 277 A Block licenses and
E:\FR\FM\13JAP1.SGM
13JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
387 B Block licenses. On March 27,
1999, the Commission re-auctioned 161
licenses; there were 32 small and very
small businesses winning that won 119
licenses. Because some LMDS services
may not have been auctioned, the SBA
standard which applies to such services
is Wireless Telecommunications
Carriers (except satellite), pursuant to
which a service is small if it has fewer
than 1500 employees. The NAICS Code
for this SBA classification is 51711.
23. Wireless Telecommunications
Carriers (except satellite). NAICS code
517210. Wireless Telecommunications
Carriers, except satellite, is a NAICS
standard which has a size standard of
fewer than 1500 employees. NAICS
Code 517210. Wireless cable systems
use 2 GHz band frequencies of the
Broadband Radio Service (BRS),
formerly Multipoint Distribution
Service (MDS), and the Educational
Broadband Service (EBS), formerly
Instructional Television Fixed Service
(ITFS), to transmit video programming
and provide broadband services to
residential subscribers. These services
were originally designed for the delivery
of multichannel video programming,
similar to that of traditional cable
systems, but over the past several years
licensees have focused their operations
instead on providing two-way highspeed Internet access services. The
Commission estimates that the number
of wireless cable subscribers is
approximately 100,000, as of March
2005. As noted, within the category of
Wireless Telecommunications Carriers,
except satellite, such firms with fewer
than 1500 employees are considered to
be small. 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS Code
517210. The data presented were
acquired when the applicable SBA
small business size standard was called
Cable and Other Program Distribution,
and which referred to all such firms
having $13.5 million or less in annual
receipts. 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS Code
517110. According to Census Bureau
data for 2002, there were a total of 1,191
firms in this category that operated for
the entire year. U.S. Census Bureau,
2002 Economic Census, Subject Series:
Information, Table 4, Receipts Size of
Firms for the United States: 2002,
NAICS code 517510 (issued November
2005). Of this total, 1,087 firms had
annual receipts of under $10 million,
and 43 firms had receipts of $10 million
or more but less than $25 million. U.S.
Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census,
Subject Series: Information, Table 4,
Receipts Size of Firms for the United
States: 2002, NAICS code 517510
(issued November 2005). The SBA small
business size standard for the broad
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:05 Jan 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
census category of Wireless
Telecommunications Carriers, which
consists of such entities with fewer than
1,500 employees, appears applicable to
MDS and ITFS. Other standards also
apply, as described.
24. The Commission has defined
small MDS (now BRS) entities in the
context of Commission license auctions.
In the 1996 MDS auction, the
Commission defined a small business as
an entity that had annual average gross
revenues of less than $40 million in the
previous three calendar years. This
definition of a small entity in the
context of MDS auctions has been
approved by the SBA. In the MDS
auction, 67 bidders won 493 licenses. Of
the 67 auction winners, 61 claimed
status as a small business. At this time,
the Commission estimates that of the 61
small business MDS auction winners, 48
remain small business licensees. In
addition to the 48 small businesses that
hold BTA authorizations, there are
approximately 392 incumbent MDS
licensees that have gross revenues that
are not more than $40 million and are
thus considered small entities. MDS
licensees and wireless cable operators
that did not receive their licenses as a
result of the MDS auction fall under the
SBA small business size standard for
Wireless Telecommunications Carriers
(except satellite). 13 CFR 121.201,
NAICS Code 517210. As noted, within
the category of Wireless
Telecommunications Carriers, such
firms with fewer than 1500 employees
are considered to be small. 13 CFR
121.201, NAICS Code 517210. The data
presented were acquired when the
applicable SBA small business size
standard was called Cable and Other
Program Distribution, and which
referred to all such firms having $13.5
million or less in annual receipts. 13
CFR 121.201, NAICS Code 517110.
According to Census Bureau data for
2002, there were a total of 1,191 firms
in this category that operated for the
entire year. U.S. Census Bureau, 2002
Economic Census, Subject Series:
Information, Table 4, Receipts Size of
Firms for the United States: 2002,
NAICS code 517510 (issued November
2005). Of this total, 1,087 firms had
annual receipts of under $10 million,
and 43 firms had receipts of $10 million
or more but less than $25 million. U.S.
Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census,
Subject Series: Information, Table 4,
Receipts Size of Firms for the United
States: 2002, NAICS code 517510
(issued November 2005). Information
available to the Commission indicates
that there are approximately 850 of
these licensees and operators that do not
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1659
generate revenue in excess of $13.5
million annually. Therefore, the
Commission estimates that there are
approximately 850 small entity MDS (or
BRS) providers, as defined by the SBA
and the Commission’s auction rules.
25. Educational institutions are
included in this analysis as small
entities; however, the Commission has
not created a specific small business
size standard for ITFS (now EBS). The
Commission estimates that there are
currently 2,032 ITFS (or EBS) licensees,
and all but 100 of the licenses are held
by educational institutions. Thus, the
Commission estimates that at least 1,932
ITFS licensees are small entities.
26. Open Video Services. Open Video
Service (OVS) systems provide
subscription services. See 47 U.S.C. 573.
The data presented were acquired when
the applicable SBA small business size
standard was called Cable and Other
Program Distribution, and which
referred to all such firms having $13.5
million or less in annual receipts. 13
CFR 121.201, NAICS Code 517110.
According to Census Bureau data for
2002, there were a total of 1,191 firms
in this category that operated for the
entire year. U.S. Census Bureau, 2002
Economic Census, Subject Series:
Information, Table 4, Receipts Size of
Firms for the United States: 2002,
NAICS code 517510 (issued November
2005). Of this total, 1,087 firms had
annual receipts of under $10 million,
and 43 firms had receipts of $10 million
or more but less than $25 million. U.S.
Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census,
Subject Series: Information, Table 4,
Receipts Size of Firms for the United
States: 2002, NAICS code 517510
(issued November 2005). This standard
has been replaced by the Wireless
Telecommunications Carriers (except
satellite) standard, which considers
firms with fewer than 1,500 employees
to be small. NAICS Code 517210. The
Commission has certified approximately
100 OVS operators to serve 75 areas,
and some of these are currently
providing service. See https://
www.fcc.gov/csb/ovs/csovscer.html
(current as of June 2004). These data
were collected when ‘‘Cable and Other
Program Distribution’’ was the operative
distribution technology. Affiliates of
Residential Communications Network,
Inc. (RCN) received approval to operate
OVS systems in New York City, Boston,
Washington, DC, and other areas. RCN
has sufficient revenues to assure that
they do not qualify as a small business
entity. Little financial information is
available for the other entities that are
authorized to provide OVS and are not
yet operational. Given that some entities
authorized to provide OVS service have
E:\FR\FM\13JAP1.SGM
13JAP1
1660
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
not yet begun to generate revenues, the
Commission concludes that those OVS
operators remaining might qualify as
small businesses that may be affected by
the rules and policies adopted herein.
27. In addition, an element of the
definition of ‘‘small business’’ is that the
entity not be dominant in its field of
operation. The Commission is unable at
this time to define or quantify the
criteria that would establish whether a
specific television station is dominant
in its field of operation. Accordingly,
the estimate of small businesses to
which rules may apply does not exclude
any television station from the
definition of a small business on this
basis and is therefore over-inclusive to
that extent. Also as noted, an additional
element of the definition of ‘‘small
business’’ is that the entity must be
independently owned and operated.
The Commission notes that it is difficult
at times to assess these criteria in the
context of media entities and our
estimates of small businesses to which
they apply may be over-inclusive to this
extent.
28. Telephone Companies. Neither the
Commission nor the SBA has developed
a small business size standard
specifically for incumbent local
exchange services. The appropriate size
standard under SBA rules is for the
category Wired Telecommunications
Carriers. Under that size standard, such
a business is small if it has 1,500 or
fewer employees. 13 CFR 121.201,
NAICS code 517110. According to
Commission data, 1,307 carriers have
reported that they are engaged in the
provision of incumbent local exchange
services. FCC, Wireline Competition
Bureau, Industry Analysis and
Technology Division, ‘‘Trends in
Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3, Page
5–5 (February 2007). This source uses
data that are current as of October 20,
2005. Of these 1,307 carriers, an
estimated 1,019 have 1,500 or fewer
employees and 288 have more than
1,500 employees. Consequently, the
Commission estimates that most
providers of incumbent local exchange
service are small businesses that may be
affected by our action. The Commission
estimates that ten LECs currently
provide video programming, and several
smaller telephone companies provide
the service.
29. Incumbent Local Exchange
Carriers (LECs). Neither the Commission
nor the SBA has developed a small
business size standard specifically for
incumbent local exchange services. The
appropriate size standard under NCAIS
rules is for the category Wired
Telecommunications Carriers. Under
that size standard, such a business is
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:05 Jan 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.
13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110.
According to Commission data, 1,307
carriers have reported that they are
engaged in the provision of incumbent
local exchange services. FCC, Wireline
Competition Bureau, Industry Analysis
and Technology Division, ‘‘Trends in
Telephone Service’’ at Table 5.3, Page
5–5 (February 2007). This source uses
data that are current as of October 20,
2005. Of these 1,307 carriers, an
estimated 1,019 have 1,500 or fewer
employees and 288 have more than
1,500 employees. Consequently, the
Commission estimates that most
providers of incumbent local exchange
service are small businesses that may be
affected by our action. The Commission
estimates that ten LECs currently
provide video programming, and several
smaller telephone companies provide
the service.
30. Closed Captioning Services. These
entities are indirectly affected by the
Commission’s action. The SBA has
developed two small business size
standards that may be used for closed
captioning services. The two size
standards track the economic census
categories, ‘‘Teleproduction and Other
Postproduction Services’’ and ‘‘Court
Reporting and Stenotype Services.’’
31. The first category of
Teleproduction and Other
Postproduction Services ‘‘comprises
establishments primarily engaged in
providing specialized motion picture or
video postproduction services, such as
editing, film/tape transfers, subtitling,
credits, closed captioning, and
animation and special effects.’’ The
relevant size standard for small
businesses in these services is an annual
revenue of less than $29.5 million. U.S.
Census Bureau, 2002 NAICS
Definitions, ‘‘512191 Teleproduction
and Other Postproduction Services.’’
The size standard is $29.5 million. For
this category, Census Bureau data for
2002 show that there were 1,316 firms
that operated for the entire year. U.S.
Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census,
Subject Series: Information,
‘‘Establishment and Firm Size
(Including Legal Form of
Organization),’’ Table 4, NAICS code
512191 (issued November 2005). Of this
total, 1,301 firms had annual receipts of
under $25 million, and 10 firms had
receipts of $25 million to $49,999,999.
U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic
Census, Subject Series: Information,
‘‘Establishment and Firm Size
(Including Legal Form of
Organization),’’ Table 4, NAICS code
512191 (issued Nov. 2005). An
additional 5 firms had annual receipts
of $50 million or more. Consequently,
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the Commission estimates that the
majority of Teleproduction and Other
Postproduction Services firms are small
entities that might be affected by our
action.
32. The second category of Court
Reporting and Stenotype Services
‘‘comprises establishments primarily
engaged in providing verbatim reporting
and stenotype recording of live legal
proceedings and transcribing
subsequent recorded materials.’’ The
size standard for small businesses in
these services is an annual revenue of
less than $7 million. U.S. Census
Bureau, 2002 NAICS Definitions,
‘‘561492 Court Reporting and Stenotype
Services.’’ The size standard is $7
million. For this category, Census
Bureau data for 2002 show that there
were 2,487 firms that operated for the
entire year. U.S. Census Bureau, 2002
Economic Census, Subject Series:
Administrative and Support and Waste
Management and Remediation Services,
‘‘Establishment and Firm Size
(Including Legal Form of
Organization),’’ Table 4, NAICS code
561492 (issued Nov. 2005). Of this total,
2,461 firms had annual receipts of under
$5 million, and 16 firms had receipts of
$5 million to $9,999,999. U.S. Census
Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject
Series: Administrative and Support and
Waste Management and Remediation
Services, ‘‘Establishment and Firm Size
(Including Legal Form of
Organization),’’ Table 4, NAICS code
561492 (issued Nov. 2005). An
additional 10 firms had annual receipts
of $10 million or more. Consequently,
the Commission estimates that the
majority of Court Reporting and
Stenotype Services firms are small
entities that might be affected by our
action.
Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping and Other Compliance
Requirements
33. The Commission does not
anticipate that the proposals contained
in the 2008 Digital Closed Captioning
NPRM will impose additional reporting,
recordkeeping or compliance
requirements.
Steps Taken To Minimize Significant
Impact on Small Entities, and
Significant Alternatives Considered
34. The RFA requires an agency to
describe any significant alternatives that
it has considered in reaching its
proposed approach, which may include
the following four alternatives (among
others): (1) The establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
E:\FR\FM\13JAP1.SGM
13JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements
under the rule for small entities; (3) the
use of performance, rather than design,
standards; and (4) an exemption from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof,
for small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603(b).
35. How the Commission resolves the
question of how to treat digital multicast
streams for purposes of the closed
captioning rules is important, for
purposes of § 79.1(d)(12) of the
Commission’s rules, which exempts
from the closed captioning obligations
video programming channels that
produced annual gross revenues of less
than $3 million during the previous
calendar year. By its very nature,
current § 79.1(d)(12) of the
Commission’s rules decreases the closed
captioning burden on entities whose
annual gross revenues for the previous
year were less than $3 million. With
regard to the proposal to treat each of
the multicast streams individually, the
2008 Digital Closed Captioning NPRM
suggests that this likely will result in
less captioned programming being
available, and seeks comment on this
assumption. Although this decision may
decrease burdens on small businesses, it
may mean that individuals who rely on
closed captioning are burdened. At the
same time, however, if the majority of
programming aired on secondary
multicast streams is already captioned,
it is possible that the percentage of
available captioning will not be greatly
affected, given that programming that is
already captioned and delivered to a
broadcaster for airing must be aired with
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:05 Jan 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
the captions intact, pursuant to the
existing pass through rule, which is
unaffected by the 2008 Digital Closed
Captioning NPRM. The Commission
notes that, under the Commission’s
rules, programming that is already
captioned and delivered to a broadcaster
for airing must be aired with the
captions intact, regardless of the
multicast stream on which the
programming airs. See 47 CFR 79.1(c) of
the Commission’s rules. Another
alternative being considered by the
Commission would retain the concept
that each stream of multicast
programming is separate, but the
revenue threshold for determining
whether one of the non-main
programming streams is exempt would
be less than $3 million. Given the
general nature of the programming on
such channels, the Commission seeks
comment on whether a smaller figure
may be appropriate.
36. In the alternative, if the
Commission adopts the proposal to
aggregate the revenues of all multicast
streams, digital broadcasters would be
exempt from the Commission’s
captioning requirements under
§ 79.1(d)(12) of the Commission’s rules
only if their overall operations, taking
into account all activities on all
‘‘streams,’’ received less than $3 million
in revenues. However, the 2008 Digital
Closed Captioning NPRM notes that this
conclusion might affect program
diversity, the airing of locally-originated
programming, or the airing of other
kinds of programming that may afford
little or no economic return. The
Commission further seeks comment on
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1661
whether it also may result in an increase
in the number of petitions for
exemption from the closed captioning
requirements based on the undue
burden standard in the Commission’s
current rules. See 47 CFR 79.1(f) of the
Commission’s rules.
37. The last alternative the 2008
Digital Closed Captioning NPRM
considers is the establishment of a
captioning requirement that is not
dependant on revenues but relies on
some other criteria, such as a formula
that considers the number of
programming streams being offered (or
some other variable) in order to
determine captioning obligations.
Federal Rules Which Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With, the
Commission’s Proposals
38. None.
Ordering Clauses
Pursuant to sections 4(i), 303(r) and
713 of the Communications Act of 1934,
as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 303(r) and
613, the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
is adopted.
The Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference
Information Center, shall send a copy of
the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
including the Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Certification, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration.
Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–31446 Filed 1–12–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\13JAP1.SGM
13JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 1654-1661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-31446]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 79
[CG Docket No. 05-231; FCC 08-255]
Closed Captioning of Video Programming
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission seeks comment on the
application of the closed captioning rules to digital broadcasting,
specifically to broadcasters that choose to use their digital allotment
to multicast several streams of programming. The Commission's rules
exempt video programming channels that produced annual gross revenues
of less than $3 million during the previous calendar year from the
Commission's closed captioning obligations. The Commission did not
determine what constitutes a ``channel'' for purposes of satisfying
this self-implementing exemption. The Commission therefore seeks
comment on issues related to, for purposes of this exemption, whether
each programming stream on a multicast signal constitutes a separate
channel, or whether the broadcaster's entire operations attributable to
its digital allotment should be considered one channel.
DATES: Comments are due on or before February 12, 2009. Reply comments
are due on or before February 27, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments identified by CG
Docket No. 05-231, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically
using the Internet by accessing the Commission's Electronic Comment
Filing System (ECFS), through the Commission's Web site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/, or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Filers should follow the instructions provided on
the Web site for submitting comments. For ECFS filers, in completing
the transmittal screen, filers should include their full name, U.S.
Postal Service mailing address, and CG Docket No. 05-231. Parties also
may submit an electronic comment by Internet e-mail. To get filing
instructions, filers should send an e-mail to ecfs@fcc.gov, and include
the following words in the body of the message, ``get form .'' A sample form and directions will be sent in response.
Paper filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and four copies of each filing. Filings can be sent by
hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by
first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail (although the
Commission continues to experience delays in receiving U.S. Postal
Service mail). All filings must be addressed to the Commission's
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
The Commission's contractor will receive hand-delivered or
messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary at 236
Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110, Washington, DC 20002. The filing
hours at this location are 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. All hand deliveries must be
held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes must be
disposed of before entering the building.
Commercial Mail sent by overnight mail (other than U.S.
Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300
East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority
mail should be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
People with Disabilities: To request materials in
accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print,
electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or
call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530
(voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY).
For detailed instructions for submitting comments and additional
[[Page 1655]]
information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amelia Brown, Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Disability Rights Office at (202) 418-2799
or e-mail at Amelia.Brown@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Closed
Captioning of Video Programming; Closed Captioning Requirements for
Digital Television Receivers, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (2008
Digital Closed Captioning NPRM), document FCC 08-255, adopted November
3, 2008, and released November 7, 2008, in CG Docket No. 05-231,
seeking comment on matters concerning Sec. 79.1(d)(12) of the
Commission's rules and digital multicast channels. The full text of FCC
08-255 and copies of any subsequently filed documents in this matter
will be available for public inspection and copying during regular
business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445
12th Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. FCC 08-255 and
copies of subsequently filed documents in this matter may also be
purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor at Portals II,
445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. Customers may
contact the Commission's duplicating contractor at its Web site, http:/
/www.bcpiweb.com, or by calling 1-800-378-3160. FCC 08-255 can also be
downloaded in Word or Portable Document Format (PDF) at: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/caption.html. Parties who choose to file by paper
should also submit their comments on compact disc. The compact disc
should be submitted, along with three paper copies, to: Traci Randolph,
Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Disability Rights Office, 445
12th Street, SW., Room 3-C425, Washington, DC 20554. Such submission
should be on a compact disc formatted in an IBM compatible format using
Word 2003 or a compatible software. The compact disc should be
accompanied by a cover letter and should be submitted in ``read only''
mode. The compact disc should be clearly labeled with the commenter's
name, proceeding (CG Docket No. 05-231), type of pleading (comment or
reply comment), date of submission, and the name of the electronic file
on the compact disc. The label also should include the following
phrase: ``CD-Rom Copy--Not an Original.'' Each compact disc should
contain only one party's pleadings, preferably in a single electronic
file. In addition, commenters filing by paper must send a compact disc
copy to the Commission's duplicating contractor at Portals II, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554.
Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis
This document does not contain proposed information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law
104-13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any proposed
information collection burden ``for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief
Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
Synopsis
1. As the nation transitions from analog to digital broadcasting,
the video programming and broadcasting landscape will change
substantially. With analog broadcasting, broadcasters use their
spectrum allocation to provide programming on a single channel. With
digital broadcasting, broadcasters may use their digital allotment to
multicast several streams of programming, known as ``multicasting.''
Section 79.1(d)(12) of the Commission's rules exempts video programming
channels that produced annual gross revenues of less than $3 million
during the previous calendar year from the Commission's closed
captioning obligations. The Commission seeks comment on the application
of Sec. 79.1(d)(12) of the Commission's rules to digital broadcasting.
2. In 1997, when the Commission adopted the exemption for channels
producing less than $3 million in revenues, it specified that
``[a]nnual gross revenues shall be calculated for each channel
individually based on revenues received in the preceding calendar year
from all sources related to the programming on that channel.'' The
Commission did not determine, however, what constitutes a ``channel''
for purposes of satisfying this self-implementing exemption. The
Commission seeks comment on whether, for purposes of Sec. 79.1(d)(12)
of the Commission's rules, each programming stream on a multicast
signal constitutes a separate channel, or whether the broadcaster's
entire operations attributable to its digital allotment should be
considered one channel.
3. Under the Commission's rules, programming that is already
captioned and delivered to a broadcaster for airing must be aired with
the captions intact, regardless of the multicast stream on which the
programming airs, pursuant to the pass through rule. Given the pass
through rule, it is likely that much of the programming delivered to
broadcasters for airing on multicast streams will already be captioned,
especially if it is programming provided by a network programmer, even
if Sec. 79.1(d)(12) of the Commission's rules applies to each
multicast channel. The Commission seeks comment on what percentage of
programming that airs on multicast streams, other than the main stream,
is network programming, and how much of that programming is already
captioned.
4. The Commission seeks comment on whether individual programming
streams should not be considered separate channels for purposes of
calculating revenues for purposes of Sec. 79.1(d)(12) of the
Commission's rules. In such circumstances, digital broadcasters would
be exempt from the Commission's requirements under Sec. 79.1(d)(12) of
the Commission's rules only if their overall operations, taking into
account all activities on all ``streams,'' received less than $3
million in revenues. The Commission seeks comment on the relative
merits of this approach and its practical effects, including how this
determination might affect program diversity, the airing of locally-
originated programming, or the airing of other kinds of programming
that may afford little or no economic return. The Commission also seeks
comment on whether this approach may result in an increase in the
number of petitions for exemption from the closed captioning
requirements under the ``undue burden'' standard set forth in Sec.
79.1(f) of the Commission's rules.
5. The Commission seeks comment on whether the $3 million revenue
amount is a reasonable threshold for determining if secondary multicast
streams should be exempt from the closed captioning requirements, or
whether a smaller figure is appropriate and, if so, what that amount
should be.
6. The Commission seeks comment on whether it is appropriate to
adopt something other than a fixed revenue threshold for determining
whether secondary multicast streams must be captioned. For example,
comment is sought on whether the captioning requirements should be tied
to a formula that considers the number of programming streams being
offered (or some other variable), such as that used for determining a
multicasting broadcaster's children's television programming
requirements. Finally, the Commission seeks comment on similar
alternatives for applying captioning
[[Page 1656]]
requirements to multicast program streams.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Certification
7. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as
amended (RFA), the Commission has prepared this present Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities by the
policies and rules proposed in this 2008 Digital Closed Captioning
NPRM. See 5 U.S.C. 603. Written public comments are requested on this
IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be
filed by the deadlines for comments on the 2008 Digital Closed
Captioning NPRM provided in paragraph 43 of the Item. The Commission
will send a copy of the 2008 Digital Closed Captioning NPRM, including
this IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA). See 5 U.S.C. 603(a).
Need for, and Objectives of, the Proposed Rules
8. The Commission initiates this review relating to closed
captioning in anticipation of the transition to digital television
(DTV) by full power broadcasters, which will occur on February 18,
2009. This rulemaking proceeding proposes several options for the
appropriate treatment of digital broadcasters that choose to use their
digital allotment to multicast several streams of programming (known as
``multicasting''). In light of this new broadcasting environment, the
2008 Digital Closed Captioning NPRM proposes several options for
determining the closed captioning obligations for multicasting
broadcasters. The 2008 Digital Closed Captioning NPRM seeks comment on
Sec. 79.1(d)(12) of the Commission's rules, which exempts from the
closed captioning obligations video programming channels that produced
annual gross revenues of less than $3 million during the previous
calendar year. 47 CFR 79.1(d)(12). In order to determine whether each
stream of a digital broadcaster's multicast operation must be
captioned, the Commission proposes several possible alternatives and
the possible outcomes to each alternative.
9. The proposals set forth in the 2008 Digital Closed Captioning
NPRM, for which comment is sought, contemplate as possible outcomes the
following: Treat each multicast stream as a separate channel and
calculate their revenues separately; treat each multicast stream as a
separate channel and calculate their revenues separately, but decrease
the revenue threshold for determining whether the non-main programming
streams must close caption; treat individual programming streams as one
channel, in which case the revenues would be aggregated for purposes of
determining if the exemption in Sec. 79.1(d)(12) of the Commission's
rules applies; or, impose a new non-revenue approach for deciding how
much programming must be captioned on multicast streams.
Legal Basis
10. The authority for this proposed rulemaking is contained in
sections 4(i), 303(r) and 713 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 303(r) and 613.
Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities Impacted
11. The RFA directs the Commission to provide a description of and,
where feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that will
be affected by the rules. 5 U.S.C. 604(a)(3). The RFA generally defines
the term ``small entity'' as having the same meaning as the terms
``small business,'' ``small organization,'' and ``small business
concern'' under section 3 of the Small Business Act. 5 U.S.C. 601(6).
Under the Small Business Act, a small business concern is one which:
(1) Is independently owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its
field of operation; and (3) satisfies any additional criteria
established by the SBA. 5 U.S.C. 632.
12. Nationwide, there are a total of approximately 22.4 million
small businesses, according to SBA data. See SBA, Programs and
Services, SBA Pamphlet No. CO-0028, at page 40 (July 2002). A ``small
organization'' is generally ``any not-for-profit enterprise which is
independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field.'' 5
U.S.C. 601(4). Nationwide, as of 2002, there were approximately 1.6
million small organizations. ``Independent Sector, The New Nonprofit
Almanac & Desk Reference'' (2002). The term ``small governmental
jurisdiction'' is defined generally as ``governments of cities, towns,
townships, villages, school districts, or special districts, with a
population of less than fifty thousand.'' 5 U.S.C. 601(5). Census
Bureau data for 2002 indicate that there were 87,525 local governmental
jurisdictions in the United States. U.S. Census Bureau, ``Statistical
Abstract of the United States: 2006,'' section 8, page 272, Table 415.
The Commission estimates that, of this total, 84,377 entities were
``small governmental jurisdictions.'' The Commission assumes that the
villages, school districts, and special districts are small, and total
48,558. For 2002, Census Bureau data indicate that the total number of
county, municipal, and township governments nationwide was 38,967, of
which 35,819 were small. See U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract
of the United States: 2006, section 8, page 273, Table 417. Thus, the
Commission estimates that most governmental jurisdictions are small.
13. Wired Telecommunications Carriers. The Census Bureau defines
this category as follows: ``This industry comprises establishments
primarily engaged as third-party distribution systems for broadcast
programming. The establishments of this industry deliver visual, aural,
or textual programming received from cable networks, local television
stations, or radio networks to consumers via cable or direct-to-home
satellite systems on a subscription or fee basis. These establishments
do not generally originate programming material.'' U.S. Census Bureau,
2002 NAICS Definitions, ``517110 Wired Telecommunications Carriers.''
The SBA has developed a small business size standard for wireline firms
within the broad economic census category, ``Wired Telecommunications
Carriers.'' 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110. Under this category, the
SBA deems a wireline business to be small if it has 1,500 or fewer
employees. Census Bureau data for 2002 show that there were 2,432 firms
in this category that operated for the entire year. U.S. Census Bureau,
2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, ``Establishment and
Firm Size: 2002 (Including Legal Form of Organization),'' Table 5,
NAICS code 517110 (issued Nov. 2005). Of this total, 2,395 firms had
employment of 999 or fewer employees, and 37 firms had employment of
1,000 employees or more. U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census,
Subject Series: Information, ``Establishment and Firm Size: 2002
(Including Legal Form of Organization),'' Table 5, NAICS code 517110
(issued Nov. 2005). Thus, under this category and associated small
business size standard, the majority of firms can be considered small.
14. Cable Television Distribution Services. Since 2007, these
services have been defined within the broad economic census category of
Wired Telecommunications Carriers; that category is defined as follows:
``This industry comprises establishments primarily engaged in operating
and/or providing access to transmission facilities and infrastructure
that they own and/or lease for the transmission of
[[Page 1657]]
voice, data, text, sound, and video using wired telecommunications
networks. Transmission facilities may be based on a single technology
or a combination of technologies.'' U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS
Definitions, ``517110 Wired Telecommunications Carriers'' (partial
definition. The SBA has developed a small business size standard for
this category, which is: all such firms having 1,500 or fewer
employees. The NAICS Code associated with this size standard is 517110.
To gauge small business prevalence for these cable services we must,
however, use current census data that are based on the previous
category of Cable and Other Program Distribution and its associated
size standard; that size standard was: all such firms having $13.5
million or less in annual receipts. 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110.
According to Census Bureau data for 2002, there were a total of 1,191
firms in this previous category that operated for the entire year. U.S.
Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, Table
4, Receipts Size of Firms for the United States: 2002, NAICS code
517510 (issued November 2005). Of this total, 1,087 firms had annual
receipts of under $10 million, and 43 firms had receipts of $10 million
or more but less than $25 million. Thus, the majority of these firms
can be considered small.
15. Cable Companies and Systems. The Commission has also developed
its own small business size standards, for the purpose of cable rate
regulation. Under the Commission's rules, a ``small cable company'' is
one serving 400,000 or fewer subscribers, nationwide. 47 CFR 76.901(e)
of the Commission's rules. The Commission determined that this size
standard equates approximately to a size standard of $100 million or
less in annual revenues. Implementation of Sections of the 1992 Cable
Act: Rate Regulation, Sixth Report and Order and Eleventh Order on
Reconsideration, 10 FCC Rcd 7393, 7408 (1995), published at 60 FR
35854, July 12, 1995. Industry data indicate that, of 1,076 cable
operators nationwide, all but eleven are small under this size
standard. These data are derived from: R.R. Bowker, Broadcasting &
Cable Yearbook 2006, ``Top 25 Cable/Satellite Operators,'' pages A-8 &
C-2 (data current as of June 30, 2005); Warren Communications News,
Television & Cable Factbook 2006, ``Ownership of Cable Systems in the
United States,'' pages D-1805 to D-1857. In addition, under the
Commission's rules, a ``small system'' is a cable system serving 15,000
or fewer subscribers. 47 CFR 76.901(c) of the Commission's rules.
Industry data indicate that, of 7,208 systems nationwide, 6,139 systems
have under 10,000 subscribers, and an additional 379 systems have
10,000-19,999 subscribers. Warren Communications News, Television &
Cable Factbook 2006, ``U.S. Cable Systems by Subscriber Size,'' page F-
2 (data current as of Oct. 2005). The data do not include 718 systems
for which classifying data were not available. Thus, under this second
size standard, most cable systems are small. Wired Telecommunications
Carriers with fewer than 1,500 employees are considered to be small.
See 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110.
16. Cable System Operators. The Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, also contains a size standard for small cable system
operators, which is ``a cable operator that, directly or through an
affiliate, serves in the aggregate fewer than 1 percent of all
subscribers in the United States and is not affiliated with any entity
or entities whose gross annual revenues in the aggregate exceed
$250,000,000.'' 47 U.S.C. 543(m)(2); see 47 CFR 6.901(f) of the
Commission's rules and notes 1-3. The Commission has determined that an
operator serving fewer than 677,000 subscribers shall be deemed a small
operator, if its annual revenues, when combined with the total annual
revenues of all its affiliates, do not exceed $250 million in the
aggregate. 47 CFR 76.901(f) of the Commission's rules; see Public
Notice, FCC Announces New Subscriber Count for the Definition of Small
Cable Operator, DA 01-158 (Cable Services Bureau, January 24, 2001).
Industry data indicate that, of 1,076 cable operators nationwide, all
but ten are small under this size standard. These data are derived
from: R.R. Bowker, Broadcasting & Cable Yearbook 2006, ``Top 25 Cable/
Satellite Operators,'' pages A-8 & C-2 (data current as of June 30,
2005); Warren Communications News, Television & Cable Factbook 2006,
``Ownership of Cable Systems in the United States,'' pages D-1805 to D-
1857. The Commission notes that the Commission neither requests nor
collects information on whether cable system operators are affiliated
with entities whose gross annual revenues exceed $250 million, and
therefore the Commission is unable to estimate more accurately the
number of cable system operators that would qualify as small under this
size standard. The Commission does receive such information on a case-
by-case basis if a cable operator appeals a local franchise authority's
finding that the operator does not qualify as a small cable operator
pursuant to section 76.901(f) of the Commission's rules. See 47 CFR
76.909(b) of the Commission's rules.
17. Cable Television Relay Service. This service includes
transmitters generally used to relay cable programming within cable
television system distribution systems. As noted, Wired
Telecommunications Carriers with fewer than 1,500 employees are
considered to be small, under the currently applicable SBA
classification. NAICS Code 517110. The data presented were acquired
when the applicable SBA small business size standard was called Cable
and Other Program Distribution, and which referred to all such firms
having $13.5 million or less in annual receipts. 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS
code 517110. According to Census Bureau data for 2002, there were a
total of 1,191 firms in this category that operated for the entire
year. U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series:
Information, Table 4, Receipts Size of Firms for the United States:
2002, NAICS code 517510 (issued November 2005). Of this total, 1,087
firms had annual receipts of under $10 million, and 43 firms had
receipts of $10 million or more but less than $25 million. U.S. Census
Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, Table 4,
Receipts Size of Firms for the United States: 2002, NAICS code 517510
(issued November 2005). Thus, under this size standard, the majority of
firms can be considered small.
18. Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) Service. DBS service is a
nationally distributed subscription service that delivers video and
audio programming via satellite to a small parabolic ``dish'' antenna
at the subscriber's location. DBS falls under the SBA definition of
``Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except satellite)'', which
establishes as a small DBS company any DBS company which has less than
1,500 employees. 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS Code 517210. The data presented
were acquired when the applicable SBA small business size standard was
called Cable and Other Program Distribution, and which referred to all
such firms having $13.5 million or less in annual receipts. 13 CFR
121.201, NAICS code 517110. According to Census Bureau data for 2002,
there were a total of 1,191 firms in this category that operated for
the entire year. U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject
Series: Information, Table 4, Receipts Size of Firms for the United
States: 2002, NAICS code 517510 (issued November 2005). Of this total,
1,087 firms had annual receipts of under $10 million,
[[Page 1658]]
and 43 firms had receipts of $10 million or more but less than $25
million. Currently, only four operators hold licenses to provide DBS
service, which requires a great investment of capital for operation.
All four currently offer subscription services. Two of these four DBS
operators, DirecTV and EchoStar Communications Corporation (EchoStar),
report annual revenues that are in excess of the threshold for a small
business. DirecTV is the largest DBS operator and the second largest
MVPD, serving an estimated 13.04 million subscribers nationwide. See
Annual Assessment of Status of Competition in the Market for the
Delivery of Video Programming, Eleventh Annual Report, FCC 05-13,
paragraph 55 (released February 4, 2005) (2005 Cable Competition
Report). EchoStar, which provides service under the brand name Dish
Network, is the second largest DBS operator and the fourth largest
MVPD, serving an estimated 10.12 million subscribers nationwide. See
2005 Cable Competition Report, paragraph 55. A third operator, Rainbow
DBS, is a subsidiary of Cablevision's Rainbow Network, which also
reports annual revenues in excess of $13.5 million, and thus does not
qualify as a small business. Rainbow DBS, which provides service under
the brand name VOOM, reported an estimated 25,000 subscribers. See 2005
Cable Competition Report, paragraph 55. The fourth DBS operator,
Dominion Video Satellite, Inc. (Dominion), offers religious (Christian)
programming and does not report its annual receipts. Dominion, which
provides service under the brand name Sky Angel, does not publicly
disclose its subscribership numbers on an annualized basis. See 2005
Cable Competition Report, paragraph 55. The Commission does not know of
any source which provides this information and, thus, the Commission
has no way of confirming whether Dominion qualifies as a small
business. Because DBS service requires significant capital, the
Commission believes it is unlikely that a small entity as defined by
the SBA would have the financial wherewithal to become a DBS licensee.
Nevertheless, given the absence of specific data on this point, the
Commission acknowledges the possibility that there are entrants in this
field that may not yet have generated $13.5 million in annual receipts,
and therefore may be categorized as a small business, if independently
owned and operated.
19. Television Broadcasting. This Economic Census category
``comprises establishments primarily engaged in broadcasting images
together with sound. These establishments operate television
broadcasting studios and facilities for the programming and
transmission of programs to the public.'' U.S. Census Bureau, 2007
NAICS Definitions, ``515120 Television Broadcasting'' (partial
definition). The SBA has created the following small business size
standard for Television Broadcasting firms: those having $14 million or
less in annual receipts. 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 515120 (updated for
inflation in 2008). The Commission has estimated the number of licensed
commercial television stations to be 1,379. See FCC News Release,
``Broadcast Station Totals as of December 31, 2007,'' dated March 18,
2008. In addition, according to Commission staff review of the BIA
Publications, Inc., Master Access Television Analyzer Database (BIA) on
March 30, 2007, about 986 of an estimated 1,374 commercial television
stations (or approximately 72 percent) had revenues of $13 million or
less. The Commission recognizes that BIA's estimate differs slightly
from the FCC total. The Commission therefore estimates that the
majority of commercial television broadcasters are small entities.
20. The Commission notes, however, that in assessing whether a
business concern qualifies as small under the above definition,
business (control) affiliations must be included. 13 CFR 21.103(a)(1).
The Commission's estimate, therefore, likely overstates the number of
small entities that might be affected by our action, because the
revenue figure on which it is based does not include or aggregate
revenues from affiliated companies. In addition, an element of the
definition of ``small business'' is that the entity not be dominant in
its field of operation. The Commission is unable at this time to define
or quantify the criteria that would establish whether a specific
television station is dominant in its field of operation. Accordingly,
the estimate of small businesses to which rules may apply does not
exclude any television station from the definition of a small business
on this basis and is therefore possibly over-inclusive to that extent.
21. In addition, the Commission has estimated the number of
licensed noncommercial educational (NCE) television stations to be 380.
See FCC News Release, ``Broadcast Station Totals as of December 31,
2007,'' dated March 18, 2008. These stations are non-profit, and
therefore considered to be small entities. See generally 5 U.S.C.
601(4), (6). In addition, there are also 2,295 low power television
stations (LPTV). See FCC News Release, ``Broadcast Station Totals as of
December 31, 2007,'' dated March 18, 2008. Given the nature of this
service, we will presume that all LPTV licensees qualify as small
entities under the above SBA small business size standard.
22. Local Multipoint Distribution Service. Local Multipoint
Distribution Service (LMDS) is a fixed broadband point-to-multipoint
microwave service that provides for two-way video telecommunications.
See Rulemaking to Amend Parts 1, 2, 21, 25, of the Commission's Rules
to Redesignate the 27.5-29.5 GHz Frequency Band, Reallocate the 29.5-
30.5 Frequency Band, to Establish Rules and Policies for Local
Multipoint Distribution Service and for Fixed Satellite Services,
Second Report and Order, Order on Reconsideration, and Fifth Notice of
Proposed Rule Making, 12 FCC Rcd 12545, 12689-90, paragraph 348 (1997),
published at 62 FR 16514, April 7, 1997. The auction of the 986 Local
Multipoint Distribution Service (LMDS) licenses began on February 18,
1998 and closed on March 25, 1998. The Commission established a small
business size standard for LMDS licenses as an entity that has average
gross revenues of less than $40 million in the three previous calendar
years. See Rulemaking to Amend Parts 1, 2, 21, 25, of the Commission's
Rules to Redesignate the 27.5-29.5 GHz Frequency Band, Reallocate the
29.5-30.5 Frequency Band, to Establish Rules and Policies for Local
Multipoint Distribution Service and for Fixed Satellite Services, 12
FCC Rcd 12545, 12689-90, paragraph 348. An additional small business
size standard for ``very small business'' was added as an entity that,
together with its affiliates, has average gross revenues of not more
than $15 million for the preceding three calendar years. See Rulemaking
to Amend Parts 1, 2, 21, 25, of the Commission's Rules to Redesignate
the 27.5-29.5 GHz Frequency Band, Reallocate the 29.5-30.5 Frequency
Band, to Establish Rules and Policies for Local Multipoint Distribution
Service and for Fixed Satellite Services, 12 FCC Rcd 12545, 12689-90,
paragraph 348. The SBA has approved these small business size standards
in the context of LMDS auctions. See Letter to Dan Phythyon, Chief,
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, FCC, from Aida Alvarez,
Administrator, SBA (January 6, 1998). There were 93 winning bidders
that qualified as small entities in the LMDS auctions. A total of 93
small and very small business bidders won approximately 277 A Block
licenses and
[[Page 1659]]
387 B Block licenses. On March 27, 1999, the Commission re-auctioned
161 licenses; there were 32 small and very small businesses winning
that won 119 licenses. Because some LMDS services may not have been
auctioned, the SBA standard which applies to such services is Wireless
Telecommunications Carriers (except satellite), pursuant to which a
service is small if it has fewer than 1500 employees. The NAICS Code
for this SBA classification is 51711.
23. Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except satellite). NAICS
code 517210. Wireless Telecommunications Carriers, except satellite, is
a NAICS standard which has a size standard of fewer than 1500
employees. NAICS Code 517210. Wireless cable systems use 2 GHz band
frequencies of the Broadband Radio Service (BRS), formerly Multipoint
Distribution Service (MDS), and the Educational Broadband Service
(EBS), formerly Instructional Television Fixed Service (ITFS), to
transmit video programming and provide broadband services to
residential subscribers. These services were originally designed for
the delivery of multichannel video programming, similar to that of
traditional cable systems, but over the past several years licensees
have focused their operations instead on providing two-way high-speed
Internet access services. The Commission estimates that the number of
wireless cable subscribers is approximately 100,000, as of March 2005.
As noted, within the category of Wireless Telecommunications Carriers,
except satellite, such firms with fewer than 1500 employees are
considered to be small. 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS Code 517210. The data
presented were acquired when the applicable SBA small business size
standard was called Cable and Other Program Distribution, and which
referred to all such firms having $13.5 million or less in annual
receipts. 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS Code 517110. According to Census Bureau
data for 2002, there were a total of 1,191 firms in this category that
operated for the entire year. U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census,
Subject Series: Information, Table 4, Receipts Size of Firms for the
United States: 2002, NAICS code 517510 (issued November 2005). Of this
total, 1,087 firms had annual receipts of under $10 million, and 43
firms had receipts of $10 million or more but less than $25 million.
U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information,
Table 4, Receipts Size of Firms for the United States: 2002, NAICS code
517510 (issued November 2005). The SBA small business size standard for
the broad census category of Wireless Telecommunications Carriers,
which consists of such entities with fewer than 1,500 employees,
appears applicable to MDS and ITFS. Other standards also apply, as
described.
24. The Commission has defined small MDS (now BRS) entities in the
context of Commission license auctions. In the 1996 MDS auction, the
Commission defined a small business as an entity that had annual
average gross revenues of less than $40 million in the previous three
calendar years. This definition of a small entity in the context of MDS
auctions has been approved by the SBA. In the MDS auction, 67 bidders
won 493 licenses. Of the 67 auction winners, 61 claimed status as a
small business. At this time, the Commission estimates that of the 61
small business MDS auction winners, 48 remain small business licensees.
In addition to the 48 small businesses that hold BTA authorizations,
there are approximately 392 incumbent MDS licensees that have gross
revenues that are not more than $40 million and are thus considered
small entities. MDS licensees and wireless cable operators that did not
receive their licenses as a result of the MDS auction fall under the
SBA small business size standard for Wireless Telecommunications
Carriers (except satellite). 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS Code 517210. As
noted, within the category of Wireless Telecommunications Carriers,
such firms with fewer than 1500 employees are considered to be small.
13 CFR 121.201, NAICS Code 517210. The data presented were acquired
when the applicable SBA small business size standard was called Cable
and Other Program Distribution, and which referred to all such firms
having $13.5 million or less in annual receipts. 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS
Code 517110. According to Census Bureau data for 2002, there were a
total of 1,191 firms in this category that operated for the entire
year. U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series:
Information, Table 4, Receipts Size of Firms for the United States:
2002, NAICS code 517510 (issued November 2005). Of this total, 1,087
firms had annual receipts of under $10 million, and 43 firms had
receipts of $10 million or more but less than $25 million. U.S. Census
Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, Table 4,
Receipts Size of Firms for the United States: 2002, NAICS code 517510
(issued November 2005). Information available to the Commission
indicates that there are approximately 850 of these licensees and
operators that do not generate revenue in excess of $13.5 million
annually. Therefore, the Commission estimates that there are
approximately 850 small entity MDS (or BRS) providers, as defined by
the SBA and the Commission's auction rules.
25. Educational institutions are included in this analysis as small
entities; however, the Commission has not created a specific small
business size standard for ITFS (now EBS). The Commission estimates
that there are currently 2,032 ITFS (or EBS) licensees, and all but 100
of the licenses are held by educational institutions. Thus, the
Commission estimates that at least 1,932 ITFS licensees are small
entities.
26. Open Video Services. Open Video Service (OVS) systems provide
subscription services. See 47 U.S.C. 573. The data presented were
acquired when the applicable SBA small business size standard was
called Cable and Other Program Distribution, and which referred to all
such firms having $13.5 million or less in annual receipts. 13 CFR
121.201, NAICS Code 517110. According to Census Bureau data for 2002,
there were a total of 1,191 firms in this category that operated for
the entire year. U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject
Series: Information, Table 4, Receipts Size of Firms for the United
States: 2002, NAICS code 517510 (issued November 2005). Of this total,
1,087 firms had annual receipts of under $10 million, and 43 firms had
receipts of $10 million or more but less than $25 million. U.S. Census
Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, Table 4,
Receipts Size of Firms for the United States: 2002, NAICS code 517510
(issued November 2005). This standard has been replaced by the Wireless
Telecommunications Carriers (except satellite) standard, which
considers firms with fewer than 1,500 employees to be small. NAICS Code
517210. The Commission has certified approximately 100 OVS operators to
serve 75 areas, and some of these are currently providing service. See
https://www.fcc.gov/csb/ovs/csovscer.html (current as of June 2004).
These data were collected when ``Cable and Other Program Distribution''
was the operative distribution technology. Affiliates of Residential
Communications Network, Inc. (RCN) received approval to operate OVS
systems in New York City, Boston, Washington, DC, and other areas. RCN
has sufficient revenues to assure that they do not qualify as a small
business entity. Little financial information is available for the
other entities that are authorized to provide OVS and are not yet
operational. Given that some entities authorized to provide OVS service
have
[[Page 1660]]
not yet begun to generate revenues, the Commission concludes that those
OVS operators remaining might qualify as small businesses that may be
affected by the rules and policies adopted herein.
27. In addition, an element of the definition of ``small business''
is that the entity not be dominant in its field of operation. The
Commission is unable at this time to define or quantify the criteria
that would establish whether a specific television station is dominant
in its field of operation. Accordingly, the estimate of small
businesses to which rules may apply does not exclude any television
station from the definition of a small business on this basis and is
therefore over-inclusive to that extent. Also as noted, an additional
element of the definition of ``small business'' is that the entity must
be independently owned and operated. The Commission notes that it is
difficult at times to assess these criteria in the context of media
entities and our estimates of small businesses to which they apply may
be over-inclusive to this extent.
28. Telephone Companies. Neither the Commission nor the SBA has
developed a small business size standard specifically for incumbent
local exchange services. The appropriate size standard under SBA rules
is for the category Wired Telecommunications Carriers. Under that size
standard, such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.
13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 517110. According to Commission data, 1,307
carriers have reported that they are engaged in the provision of
incumbent local exchange services. FCC, Wireline Competition Bureau,
Industry Analysis and Technology Division, ``Trends in Telephone
Service'' at Table 5.3, Page 5-5 (February 2007). This source uses data
that are current as of October 20, 2005. Of these 1,307 carriers, an
estimated 1,019 have 1,500 or fewer employees and 288 have more than
1,500 employees. Consequently, the Commission estimates that most
providers of incumbent local exchange service are small businesses that
may be affected by our action. The Commission estimates that ten LECs
currently provide video programming, and several smaller telephone
companies provide the service.
29. Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers (LECs). Neither the
Commission nor the SBA has developed a small business size standard
specifically for incumbent local exchange services. The appropriate
size standard under NCAIS rules is for the category Wired
Telecommunications Carriers. Under that size standard, such a business
is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees. 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code
517110. According to Commission data, 1,307 carriers have reported that
they are engaged in the provision of incumbent local exchange services.
FCC, Wireline Competition Bureau, Industry Analysis and Technology
Division, ``Trends in Telephone Service'' at Table 5.3, Page 5-5
(February 2007). This source uses data that are current as of October
20, 2005. Of these 1,307 carriers, an estimated 1,019 have 1,500 or
fewer employees and 288 have more than 1,500 employees. Consequently,
the Commission estimates that most providers of incumbent local
exchange service are small businesses that may be affected by our
action. The Commission estimates that ten LECs currently provide video
programming, and several smaller telephone companies provide the
service.
30. Closed Captioning Services. These entities are indirectly
affected by the Commission's action. The SBA has developed two small
business size standards that may be used for closed captioning
services. The two size standards track the economic census categories,
``Teleproduction and Other Postproduction Services'' and ``Court
Reporting and Stenotype Services.''
31. The first category of Teleproduction and Other Postproduction
Services ``comprises establishments primarily engaged in providing
specialized motion picture or video postproduction services, such as
editing, film/tape transfers, subtitling, credits, closed captioning,
and animation and special effects.'' The relevant size standard for
small businesses in these services is an annual revenue of less than
$29.5 million. U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 NAICS Definitions, ``512191
Teleproduction and Other Postproduction Services.'' The size standard
is $29.5 million. For this category, Census Bureau data for 2002 show
that there were 1,316 firms that operated for the entire year. U.S.
Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series: Information,
``Establishment and Firm Size (Including Legal Form of Organization),''
Table 4, NAICS code 512191 (issued November 2005). Of this total, 1,301
firms had annual receipts of under $25 million, and 10 firms had
receipts of $25 million to $49,999,999. U.S. Census Bureau, 2002
Economic Census, Subject Series: Information, ``Establishment and Firm
Size (Including Legal Form of Organization),'' Table 4, NAICS code
512191 (issued Nov. 2005). An additional 5 firms had annual receipts of
$50 million or more. Consequently, the Commission estimates that the
majority of Teleproduction and Other Postproduction Services firms are
small entities that might be affected by our action.
32. The second category of Court Reporting and Stenotype Services
``comprises establishments primarily engaged in providing verbatim
reporting and stenotype recording of live legal proceedings and
transcribing subsequent recorded materials.'' The size standard for
small businesses in these services is an annual revenue of less than $7
million. U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 NAICS Definitions, ``561492 Court
Reporting and Stenotype Services.'' The size standard is $7 million.
For this category, Census Bureau data for 2002 show that there were
2,487 firms that operated for the entire year. U.S. Census Bureau, 2002
Economic Census, Subject Series: Administrative and Support and Waste
Management and Remediation Services, ``Establishment and Firm Size
(Including Legal Form of Organization),'' Table 4, NAICS code 561492
(issued Nov. 2005). Of this total, 2,461 firms had annual receipts of
under $5 million, and 16 firms had receipts of $5 million to
$9,999,999. U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 Economic Census, Subject Series:
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation
Services, ``Establishment and Firm Size (Including Legal Form of
Organization),'' Table 4, NAICS code 561492 (issued Nov. 2005). An
additional 10 firms had annual receipts of $10 million or more.
Consequently, the Commission estimates that the majority of Court
Reporting and Stenotype Services firms are small entities that might be
affected by our action.
Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping and Other Compliance
Requirements
33. The Commission does not anticipate that the proposals contained
in the 2008 Digital Closed Captioning NPRM will impose additional
reporting, recordkeeping or compliance requirements.
Steps Taken To Minimize Significant Impact on Small Entities, and
Significant Alternatives Considered
34. The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant
alternatives that it has considered in reaching its proposed approach,
which may include the following four alternatives (among others): (1)
The establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or
timetables that take into account the resources available to small
[[Page 1661]]
entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements under the rule for small entities;
(3) the use of performance, rather than design, standards; and (4) an
exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for small
entities. 5 U.S.C. 603(b).
35. How the Commission resolves the question of how to treat
digital multicast streams for purposes of the closed captioning rules
is important, for purposes of Sec. 79.1(d)(12) of the Commission's
rules, which exempts from the closed captioning obligations video
programming channels that produced annual gross revenues of less than
$3 million during the previous calendar year. By its very nature,
current Sec. 79.1(d)(12) of the Commission's rules decreases the
closed captioning burden on entities whose annual gross revenues for
the previous year were less than $3 million. With regard to the
proposal to treat each of the multicast streams individually, the 2008
Digital Closed Captioning NPRM suggests that this likely will result in
less captioned programming being available, and seeks comment on this
assumption. Although this decision may decrease burdens on small
businesses, it may mean that individuals who rely on closed captioning
are burdened. At the same time, however, if the majority of programming
aired on secondary multicast streams is already captioned, it is
possible that the percentage of available captioning will not be
greatly affected, given that programming that is already captioned and
delivered to a broadcaster for airing must be aired with the captions
intact, pursuant to the existing pass through rule, which is unaffected
by the 2008 Digital Closed Captioning NPRM. The Commission notes that,
under the Commission's rules, programming that is already captioned and
delivered to a broadcaster for airing must be aired with the captions
intact, regardless of the multicast stream on which the programming
airs. See 47 CFR 79.1(c) of the Commission's rules. Another alternative
being considered by the Commission would retain the concept that each
stream of multicast programming is separate, but the revenue threshold
for determining whether one of the non-main programming streams is
exempt would be less than $3 million. Given the general nature of the
programming on such channels, the Commission seeks comment on whether a
smaller figure may be appropriate.
36. In the alternative, if the Commission adopts the proposal to
aggregate the revenues of all multicast streams, digital broadcasters
would be exempt from the Commission's captioning requirements under
Sec. 79.1(d)(12) of the Commission's rules only if their overall
operations, taking into account all activities on all ``streams,''
received less than $3 million in revenues. However, the 2008 Digital
Closed Captioning NPRM notes that this conclusion might affect program
diversity, the airing of locally-originated programming, or the airing
of other kinds of programming that may afford little or no economic
return. The Commission further seeks comment on whether it also may
result in an increase in the number of petitions for exemption from the
closed captioning requirements based on the undue burden standard in
the Commission's current rules. See 47 CFR 79.1(f) of the Commission's
rules.
37. The last alternative the 2008 Digital Closed Captioning NPRM
considers is the establishment of a captioning requirement that is not
dependant on revenues but relies on some other criteria, such as a
formula that considers the number of programming streams being offered
(or some other variable) in order to determine captioning obligations.
Federal Rules Which Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With, the
Commission's Proposals
38. None.
Ordering Clauses
Pursuant to sections 4(i), 303(r) and 713 of the Communications Act
of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 303(r) and 613, the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking is adopted.
The Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau,
Reference Information Center, shall send a copy of the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Certification, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration.
Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-31446 Filed 1-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P