Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket Authorization, 1214-1215 [E9-257]
Download as PDF
1214
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 7 / Monday, January 12, 2009 / Notices
at https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Follow the directions
for accessing information in paragraph
n. Based on all oral and written
comments, a Scoping Document 2 (SD2)
may be issued. SD2 may include a
revised process plan and schedule, as
well as a list of issues, identified
through the scoping process.
Meeting Objectives
At the scoping meetings, staff will: (1)
Initiate scoping of the issues; (2) review
and discuss existing conditions and
resource management objectives; (3)
review and discuss existing information
and identify preliminary information
and study needs; (4) review and discuss
the process plan and schedule for prefiling activity that incorporates the time
frames provided for in Part 5 of the
Commission’s regulations and, to the
extent possible, maximizes coordination
of federal, state, and tribal permitting
and certification processes; and (5)
discuss the appropriateness of any
federal or state agency or Indian tribe
acting as a cooperating agency for
development of an environmental
document.
Meeting participants should come
prepared to discuss their issues and/or
concerns. Please review the PAD in
preparation for the scoping meetings.
Directions on how to obtain a copy of
the PAD and SD1 are included in item
m of this document.
Meeting Procedures
The meetings will be recorded by a
stenographer and will become part of
the formal record of the Commission
proceeding on the project.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–255 Filed 1–9–09; 8:45 am]
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214).
Protests will be considered by the
Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or
protests must be filed on or before the
comment date. On or before the
comment date, it is not necessary to
serve motions to intervene or protests
on persons other than the Applicant.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible online at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on January 12, 2009.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–251 Filed 1–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. ER09–431–000]
[Docket No. CP09–39–000]
The United Illuminating Company;
Notice of Filing
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
January 5, 2009.
Take notice that on December 19,
2008, The United Illuminating Company
(United Illuminating), pursuant to
section 205 of the Federal Power Act,
filed an Interconnection Agreement,
with Wheelabrator Bridgeport, L.P.,
Service Agreement No. 24 under United
Illuminating’s FERC Electric Tariff
Second Revised Volume 4.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:34 Jan 09, 2009
Jkt 217001
Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline
Company; Notice of Request Under
Blanket Authorization
January 5, 2009.
Take notice that on December 18,
2008, Williston Basin Pipeline Company
(Williston Basin), 1250 West Century
Avenue, Bismarck, North Dakota 58503,
filed a prior notice request pursuant to
Parts 157.205 and 157.210 of the
Commission’s regulations under the
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Natural Gas Act (NGA) and Williston
Basin’s blanket certificate issued in
Docket Nos. CP82–487–000, et al., for
authorization for the construction and
operation of mainline gas compression
facilities and appurtenances in Carter
County, Montana and Golden Valley
County and Dunn County, North
Dakota, all as more fully set forth in the
application, which is on file with the
Commission and open to public
inspection. The filing may also be
viewed on the Web at https://
www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link.
Enter the docket number excluding the
last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call
toll-free, (866) 208–3676 or TTY, (202)
502–8659.
Specifically, Williston Basin states
that the proposed project will include
an increase of compressor horsepower
by adding one unit at Williston Basin’s
existing Manning Compressor Station in
Dunn County, North Dakota; a new twounit compressor station (Golva
Compressor Station) in Golden Valley
County, North Dakota; and a new twounit compressor station (Willow Creek
Compressor Station) in Carter County,
Montana. Williston Basin proposes to
install a new 4,735 horsepower (HP)
compressor at the Manning Compressor
Station, making the total design flow
rate through the station 213,000
thousand cubic feet per day (Mcf/d).
Williston Basin states that the proposed
Golva Compressor Station will consist
of two identical 3,550 HP compressors.
Williston Basin asserts that that total
design flow rate for the Golva
Compressor Station will be 214,448
Mcf/d. Williston Basin states that the
proposed Willow Creek Compressor
Station will consist of two identical
3,500 HP compressors. Williston Basin
asserts that the total design flow rate for
the Willow Creek Compressor Station
will be 139,100 Mcf/d. Williston Basin
states that it has entered into binding
Precedent Agreements which provide
that Williston Basin will deliver a
Maximum Daily Delivery Quantity
(MDQ) of 75,000 Mcf/d firm
transportation service during the
proposed project’s first in-service year.
Williston Basin asserts that it projects
an in-service date for the subject
facilities of August 1, 2009. Williston
Basin states that the estimated cost to
construct the proposed facilities is
approximately $28.3 million.
Any questions regarding the
application should be directed to Keith
A. Tiggelaar, Director of Regulatory
Affairs, Williston Basin Interstate
Pipeline Company, 1250 West Century
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 7 / Monday, January 12, 2009 / Notices
Avenue, Bismarck, North Dakota 58503,
at (701) 530–1560.
Any person may, within 60 days after
the issuance of the instant notice by the
Commission, file pursuant to Rule 214
of the Commission’s Procedural Rules
(18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene
or notice of intervention. Any person
filing to intervene or the Commission’s
staff may, pursuant to section 157.205 of
the Commission’s regulations under the
NGA (18 CFR 157.205) file a protest to
the request. If no protest is filed within
the time allowed therefore, the proposed
activity shall be deemed to be
authorized effective the day after the
time allowed for protest. If a protest is
filed and not withdrawn within 30 days
after the time allowed for filing a
protest, the instant request shall be
treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to section 7 of
the NGA.
The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings of comments, protests,
and interventions via the internet in lieu
of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii)
and the instructions on the
Commission’s Web site (https://
www.ferc.gov) under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–257 Filed 1–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8760–7]
Notice of Availability of the Final White
Paper on Integrated Modeling for
Integrated Environmental Decision
Making
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Document
Availability.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing
the availability of the final White Paper
on Integrated Modeling for Integrated
Environmental Decision Making (EPA
100/R–08/010, November 2008.
In pursuing its mission to protect
human health and to safeguard the
natural environment, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency often
relies on environmental models. The
EPA defines a model as a
‘‘simplification of reality that is
constructed to gain insights into select
attributes of a particular physical,
biological, economic, or social system.’’
While traditionally environmental
modeling has focused on considering a
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:34 Jan 09, 2009
Jkt 217001
single pollutant in a single
environmental medium, this approach
is no longer viewed as sufficient for
effective environmental management
decision support. It is increasingly
recognized that a holistic approach to
modeling the environment and the
mechanisms governing the fate and
transport of pollutants through the
different environmental media as well
as the multiple exposure pathways and
the consequent responses of humans
and ecosystems, is required to
adequately assess and address
environmental problems. Integrated
modeling is thus of importance to
helping EPA consider the environment
as a ‘‘single, interrelated system’’.
Integrated modeling encompasses a
broad range of approaches and
configurations of models, data and
assessment methods to describe and
analyze complex environmental
problems, often in a multimedia and
multidisciplinary manner.
This staff white paper recommends a
commitment to a new direction in
environmental modeling and decision
making, one that adopts a systems
thinking approach. This approach EPA
will be able to significantly improve its
ability to conduct scientific analyses in
support of integrated decision making.
The result will be implementing more
efficient, effective and equitable policies
and programs to advance environmental
protection as well as economic
prosperity. This white paper: (1)
Outlines the need for and value of
integrated modeling for EPA science
and decision-making; (2) analyzes the
state of the art and practice of integrated
modeling and include examples of how
this approach has been successfully
applied and the lessons learned; (3)
identifies the challenges to more fully
implementing this approach in the
future; and (4) presents a plan to create
an enabling environment to facilitate a
concerted, systematic, and stable
approach to the development and
application of integrated modeling for
integrated decision making.
ADDRESSES: The final document is
available electronically through the
CREM Web site at: https://www.epa.gov/
crem/integrated-model-paper.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Noha Gaber, Council for Regulatory
Environmental Modeling, Office of the
Science Advisor, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Mail Code: 8105R,
Washington, DC 20460; by telephone/
voice mail at (202) 564–2179; Fax: (202)
564–2070; or via e-mail at
gaber.noha@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To
achieve its mission of protecting human
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1215
health and safeguarding the natural
environment, the U.S. EPA often
employs mathematical models to study
environmental systems and processes
and to inform regulatory decision
making. The U.S. EPA established the
Council for Regulatory Environmental
Modeling (CREM) in 2000 in an effort to
improve the quality, consistency and
transparency of EPA models.
Recognizing the policy demand for
systems integration, the CREM initiated
a series of activities to foster the
development and application of
integrated modeling. The CREM kicked
off this series of integrated modelingfocused activities by convening an EPAwide workshop on Integrated Modeling
for Integrated Environmental Decision
Making, held in January 2007. The
workshop discussions highlighted the
need for a coordinated and harmonized
approach to integrated modeling and an
institutional vision and workplan to
help overcome the scientific,
technological and organizational
challenges impeding the effective use of
integrated models. Building on this
successful workshop, an Agency White
Paper on ‘‘Integrated Modeling for
Integrated Environmental Decision
Making’’ (hereafter White Paper) was
developed. The strategic vision and
action plan proposed in the White Paper
outline a set of recommended activities
to overcome the science, information
technology and organizational
challenges facing a more consistent and
coordinated implementation of
integrated modeling to inform decision
making at EPA.
In addition to internal review within
Agency offices and regions, the White
Paper was also evaluated and approved
by the EPA’s Science Policy Council,
the Agency’s forum for senior level
policy deliberation and coordination on
significant science issues. It has also
undergone an independent external
review process through the National
Advisory Council on Environmental
Policy and Technology (NACEPT). In its
advice letter to the Agency NACEPT
highlighted their finding that
‘‘integrated modeling is a significant
cross-cutting science and technology
tool’’, endorsed the White Paper and
offered some recommendations for the
Agency to move forward to implement
the action plan proposed in the White
Paper. The NACEPT advice letter may
be found here: https://www.epa.gov/
ocem/nacept/reports/pdf/nacept-imfinal-advice-letter-092208.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 7 (Monday, January 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1214-1215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-257]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP09-39-000]
Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Request
Under Blanket Authorization
January 5, 2009.
Take notice that on December 18, 2008, Williston Basin Pipeline
Company (Williston Basin), 1250 West Century Avenue, Bismarck, North
Dakota 58503, filed a prior notice request pursuant to Parts 157.205
and 157.210 of the Commission's regulations under the Natural Gas Act
(NGA) and Williston Basin's blanket certificate issued in Docket Nos.
CP82-487-000, et al., for authorization for the construction and
operation of mainline gas compression facilities and appurtenances in
Carter County, Montana and Golden Valley County and Dunn County, North
Dakota, all as more fully set forth in the application, which is on
file with the Commission and open to public inspection. The filing may
also be viewed on the Web at https://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC at FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call toll-free, (866) 208-3676 or
TTY, (202) 502-8659.
Specifically, Williston Basin states that the proposed project will
include an increase of compressor horsepower by adding one unit at
Williston Basin's existing Manning Compressor Station in Dunn County,
North Dakota; a new two-unit compressor station (Golva Compressor
Station) in Golden Valley County, North Dakota; and a new two-unit
compressor station (Willow Creek Compressor Station) in Carter County,
Montana. Williston Basin proposes to install a new 4,735 horsepower
(HP) compressor at the Manning Compressor Station, making the total
design flow rate through the station 213,000 thousand cubic feet per
day (Mcf/d). Williston Basin states that the proposed Golva Compressor
Station will consist of two identical 3,550 HP compressors. Williston
Basin asserts that that total design flow rate for the Golva Compressor
Station will be 214,448 Mcf/d. Williston Basin states that the proposed
Willow Creek Compressor Station will consist of two identical 3,500 HP
compressors. Williston Basin asserts that the total design flow rate
for the Willow Creek Compressor Station will be 139,100 Mcf/d.
Williston Basin states that it has entered into binding Precedent
Agreements which provide that Williston Basin will deliver a Maximum
Daily Delivery Quantity (MDQ) of 75,000 Mcf/d firm transportation
service during the proposed project's first in-service year. Williston
Basin asserts that it projects an in-service date for the subject
facilities of August 1, 2009. Williston Basin states that the estimated
cost to construct the proposed facilities is approximately $28.3
million.
Any questions regarding the application should be directed to Keith
A. Tiggelaar, Director of Regulatory Affairs, Williston Basin
Interstate Pipeline Company, 1250 West Century
[[Page 1215]]
Avenue, Bismarck, North Dakota 58503, at (701) 530-1560.
Any person may, within 60 days after the issuance of the instant
notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's
Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or notice of
intervention. Any person filing to intervene or the Commission's staff
may, pursuant to section 157.205 of the Commission's regulations under
the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) file a protest to the request. If no protest
is filed within the time allowed therefore, the proposed activity shall
be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time allowed for
protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after
the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be
treated as an application for authorization pursuant to section 7 of
the NGA.
The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests, and interventions via the internet in lieu of paper. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site (https://www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-257 Filed 1-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P