Oklahoma Regulatory Program, 868-870 [E9-204]
Download as PDF
868
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 74, No. 6
Friday, January 9, 2009
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 936
[SATS No. OK–032–FOR; Docket ID: OSM–
2008–0023]
Oklahoma Regulatory Program
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing.
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSM), are announcing receipt of a
proposed amendment to the Oklahoma
regulatory program (Oklahoma program)
under the Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the
Act). Oklahoma is proposing revisions
to the Appeals procedures in section
460:20–5–13, Appeals board in section
460:20–5–14, and Notice of violations in
section 460:20–59–4.
This document gives the times and
locations that the Oklahoma program
and proposed amendments to that
program are available for your
inspection, the comment period during
which you may submit written
comments on the amendment, and the
procedures that will be followed for the
public hearing, if one is requested.
DATES: We will accept written
comments on this amendment until 4
p.m., c.d.t., February 9, 2009. If
requested, we will hold a public hearing
on the amendment on February 3, 2009.
We will accept requests to speak at a
hearing until 4 p.m., c.d.t. on January
26, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket ID: OSM–2008–
0023, by any of the following methods:
• E-mail: aclayborne@osmre.gov.
Include ‘‘Docket ID: OSM–2008–0023’’
in the subject line of the message.
• Mail/Hand Delivery: Alfred L.
Clayborne, Director, Tulsa Field Office,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:07 Jan 08, 2009
Jkt 217001
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, 1645 South 101st East
Avenue, Suite 145, Tulsa, Oklahoma
74128–4629.
• Fax: (918) 581–6419.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. The proposed rule
has been assigned Docket ID: OSM–
2008–0023. If you would like to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, go to
www.regulations.gov and do the
following. Click on the ‘‘Advanced
Docket Search’’ button on the right side
of the screen. Type in the Docket ID
OSM–2008–0023 and click the
‘‘Submit’’ button at the bottom of the
page. The next screen will display the
Docket Search Results for the
rulemaking. If you click on OSM–2008–
0023, you can view the proposed rule
and submit a comment. You can also
view supporting material and any
comments submitted by others.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Public Comment Procedures’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
review copies of the Oklahoma
regulations, this amendment, a listing of
any scheduled public hearings, and all
written comments received in response
to this document, you must go to the
address listed below during normal
business hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays. You may receive
one free copy of the amendment by
contacting OSM’s Tulsa Field Office.
Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa
Field Office, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 1645
South 101st East Avenue, Suite 145,
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74128–4629,
Telephone: (918) 581–6430, E-mail:
aclayborne@osmre.gov.
In addition, you may review a copy of
the amendment during regular business
hours at the following locations:
Oklahoma Department of Mines, 2915
N. Classen Blvd., Suite 213,
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73106–
5406, Telephone: (405) 427–3859;
Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Field Office, Telephone: (918) 581–
6430, E-mail: aclayborne@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Oklahoma Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Oklahoma
Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, ‘‘* * *
State law which provides for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations in accordance
with the requirements of this Act * * *;
and rules and regulations consistent
with regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Oklahoma
program on January 19, 1981. You can
find background information on the
Oklahoma program, including the
Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
comments, and the conditions of
approval of the Oklahoma program in
the January 19, 1981, Federal Register
(46 FR 4902). You can also find later
actions concerning the Oklahoma
program and program amendments at 30
CFR 936.10, 936.15 and 936.16.
II. Description of the Proposed
Amendment
By letter dated November 26, 2008
(Administrative Record No. OK–998),
Oklahoma sent us a proposed
amendment to its program under
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.).
Oklahoma sent the amendment at its
own initiative. Below is a summary of
the changes proposed by Oklahoma.
Any revisions that we do not
specifically discuss below concern
nonsubstantive wording or editorial
changes or corrections of crossreferences. They can be found in the full
text document of the program
amendment, which is available for you
to read at the locations listed above
under ADDRESSES.
Specifically, Oklahoma proposes to
make the following revisions to its
program.
E:\FR\FM\09JAP1.SGM
09JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules
A. Section 460:20–5–13—Appeals
procedures [Revoked]
Oklahoma proposes to delete Appeals
procedures for State employees.
(a) Employees have the right to appeal
an order for remedial action under
Section 460:20–5–12, and shall have 30
days to exercise this right before
disciplinary action is initiated.
Employees may file their appeal, in
writing, with the Appeals board
established in Section 460:20–14 below.
(b) Members of advisory boards, the
Oklahoma Mining Commission, and
commissions representing multiple
interests should follow any appeals
process provided for by the Oklahoma
Governor’s Office, Director of
Appointments.
B. Section 460:20–5–14—Appeals board
[Revoked]
Oklahoma proposes to delete the
Appeals board for State employees. A
department appeals board, composed of
three persons appointed by the Director
as representatives of the Department,
shall hear any grievance from
Department personnel concerning
termination, salary disputes, conflict of
interest, or other personnel matters
which have been determined by the
Director.
(1) Any decisions rendered by the
appeals board shall be a majority vote,
after both parties have had an
opportunity to be heard in an individual
proceeding under the Administrative
Procedures Act.
(2) Should the appeals board vote
against the decision of the Chief
Administrative Officer, the matter shall
be taken to the Director, and his or her
decision shall be considered a final
order, appealable under the
Administrative Procedures Act.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
C. Section 460:20–59–4—Notice of
violation
Oklahoma proposes to make editorial
changes by adopting language similar to
30 CFR 843.12 (f)(1), which specifies the
circumstances which may qualify a
surface coal mining operation for an
abatement period of more than 90 days.
Oklahoma proposes new language at
line (F)(2) allowing for situations where
the permittee of an ongoing permitted
operation has timely applied for and
diligently pursued a permit revision
which abates an outstanding violation
and which includes no other changes to
permit design or plans, but such
revision approval has not or will not be
issued within 90 days for reasons not
within the control of the permittee.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:07 Jan 08, 2009
Jkt 217001
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR
732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment
satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we
approve the amendment, it will become
part of the State program.
Written or Electronic Comments
Send your written or electronic
comments to OSM at the address given
above. Your written comments should
be specific, pertain only to the issues
proposed in this rulemaking, and
include explanations in support of your
recommendations. We appreciate any
and all comments, but those most useful
and likely to influence decisions on the
final regulations will be those that either
involve personal experience or include
citations to and analyses of SMCRA, its
legislative history, its implementing
regulations, case law, other pertinent
Tribal or Federal laws or regulations,
technical literature, or other relevant
publications. We will not consider or
respond to your comments when
developing the final rule if they are
received after the close of the comment
period (see DATES). We will make every
attempt to log all comments into the
administrative record, but comments
delivered to an address other than the
Tulsa Field Office may not be logged in.
Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you may ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. We will not consider anonymous
comments.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4
p.m., c.s.t. on January 26, 2009. If you
are disabled and need reasonable
accommodations to attend a public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We
will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting
the hearing. If no one requests an
opportunity to speak, we will not hold
a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an
accurate record, we request, if possible,
that each person who speaks at the
public hearing provide us with a written
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
869
copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified
date until everyone scheduled to speak
has been given an opportunity to be
heard. If you are in the audience and
have not been scheduled to speak and
wish to do so, you will be allowed to
speak after those who have been
scheduled. We will end the hearing after
everyone scheduled to speak and others
present in the audience who wish to
speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If there is only limited interest in
participating in a public hearing, we
may hold a public meeting rather than
a public hearing. If you wish to meet
with us to discuss the amendment,
please request a meeting by contacting
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings
are open to the public and, if possible,
we will post notices of meetings at the
locations listed under ADDRESSES. We
will make a written summary of each
meeting a part of the administrative
record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630—Takings
This rule does not have takings
implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the
counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
conducted the reviews required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and
has determined that this rule meets the
applicable standards of subsections (a)
and (b) of that section. However, these
standards are not applicable to the
actual language of State regulatory
programs and program amendments
because each program is drafted and
promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory
programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based
solely on a determination of whether the
submittal is consistent with SMCRA and
its implementing Federal regulations
and whether the other requirements of
30 CFR parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.
E:\FR\FM\09JAP1.SGM
09JAP1
870
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism
implications. SMCRA delineates the
roles of the Federal and State
governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ‘‘establish a
nationwide program to protect society
and the environment from the adverse
effects of surface coal mining
operations.’’ Section 503(a)(1) of
SMCRA requires that State laws
regulating surface coal mining and
reclamation operations be ‘‘in
accordance with’’ the requirements of
SMCRA, and section 503(a)(7) requires
that State programs contain rules and
regulations ‘‘consistent with’’
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
effects of this rule on Federallyrecognized Indian tribes and have
determined that the rule does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
This determination is based on the fact
that the Oklahoma program does not
regulate coal exploration and surface
coal mining and reclamation operations
on Indian lands. Therefore, the
Oklahoma program has no effect on
Federally-recognized Indian tribes.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
that Significantly Affect the Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 which requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rule that is (1)
considered significant under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866 and is not
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a statement of energy effects
is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an
environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory
program provisions do not constitute
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:07 Jan 08, 2009
Jkt 217001
major Federal actions within the
meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
determination made that the Federal
regulation did not impose an unfunded
mandate.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon the data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) Does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and (c) Does not
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S. based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based upon the fact
that the State submittal, which is the
subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation was not considered a major
rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the fact that the State submittal, which
is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 936
Dated: December 9, 2008.
William Joseph,
Acting Regional Director, Mid-Continent
Region.
[FR Doc. E9–204 Filed 1–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
41 CFR Part 102–192
[FMR Amendment 200X–XXX; FMR Case
2008–102–4; Docket 2008–0001; Sequence
1]
RIN 3090–AI79
Federal Management Regulation; FMR
Case 2008–102–4, Mail Management;
Financial Requirements for All
Agencies
AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide
Policy, General Services Administration
(GSA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The General Services
Administration is amending the mail
management section of the Federal
Management Regulation (FMR). The
proposed changes will help agencies
show accountability for their costs
regardless of whether they choose to use
commercial payment processes.
DATES: Interested parties should submit
comments in writing on or before March
10, 2009 to be considered in the
formulation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by FMR case 2008–102–4 by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Search for any
document by first selecting the proper
document types and selecting ‘‘General
Services Administration’’ as the agency
of choice. At the ‘‘Keyword’’ prompt,
type in the FMR case number (for
example, FMR Case 2008–102–4) and
click on the ‘‘Submit’’ button. You may
also search for any document by
clicking on the ‘‘Advanced search/
document search’’ tab at the top of the
screen, selecting from the agency field
‘‘General Services Administration’’, and
typing the FMR case number in the
keyword field. Select the ‘‘Submit’’
button.
• Fax: 202–501–4067.
E:\FR\FM\09JAP1.SGM
09JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 6 (Friday, January 9, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 868-870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-204]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2009 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 868]]
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 936
[SATS No. OK-032-FOR; Docket ID: OSM-2008-0023]
Oklahoma Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSM), are announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the Oklahoma
regulatory program (Oklahoma program) under the Surface Mining Control
and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Oklahoma is proposing
revisions to the Appeals procedures in section 460:20-5-13, Appeals
board in section 460:20-5-14, and Notice of violations in section
460:20-59-4.
This document gives the times and locations that the Oklahoma
program and proposed amendments to that program are available for your
inspection, the comment period during which you may submit written
comments on the amendment, and the procedures that will be followed for
the public hearing, if one is requested.
DATES: We will accept written comments on this amendment until 4 p.m.,
c.d.t., February 9, 2009. If requested, we will hold a public hearing
on the amendment on February 3, 2009. We will accept requests to speak
at a hearing until 4 p.m., c.d.t. on January 26, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket ID: OSM-2008-
0023, by any of the following methods:
E-mail: aclayborne@osmre.gov. Include ``Docket ID: OSM-
2008-0023'' in the subject line of the message.
Mail/Hand Delivery: Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa
Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement,
1645 South 101st East Avenue, Suite 145, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74128-4629.
Fax: (918) 581-6419.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
The proposed rule has been assigned Docket ID: OSM-2008-0023. If you
would like to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal,
go to www.regulations.gov and do the following. Click on the ``Advanced
Docket Search'' button on the right side of the screen. Type in the
Docket ID OSM-2008-0023 and click the ``Submit'' button at the bottom
of the page. The next screen will display the Docket Search Results for
the rulemaking. If you click on OSM-2008-0023, you can view the
proposed rule and submit a comment. You can also view supporting
material and any comments submitted by others.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking
process, see the ``Public Comment Procedures'' heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to review copies of the Oklahoma
regulations, this amendment, a listing of any scheduled public
hearings, and all written comments received in response to this
document, you must go to the address listed below during normal
business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. You may
receive one free copy of the amendment by contacting OSM's Tulsa Field
Office.
Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa Field Office, Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 1645 South 101st East Avenue, Suite
145, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74128-4629, Telephone: (918) 581-6430, E-mail:
aclayborne@osmre.gov.
In addition, you may review a copy of the amendment during regular
business hours at the following locations:
Oklahoma Department of Mines, 2915 N. Classen Blvd., Suite 213,
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73106-5406, Telephone: (405) 427-3859;
Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alfred L. Clayborne, Director, Tulsa
Field Office, Telephone: (918) 581-6430, E-mail: aclayborne@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Oklahoma Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Oklahoma Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its program includes, among other things, ``* * * State law which
provides for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the requirements of this Act * * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with regulations issued by the
Secretary pursuant to this Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On
the basis of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Oklahoma program on January 19, 1981. You
can find background information on the Oklahoma program, including the
Secretary's findings, the disposition of comments, and the conditions
of approval of the Oklahoma program in the January 19, 1981, Federal
Register (46 FR 4902). You can also find later actions concerning the
Oklahoma program and program amendments at 30 CFR 936.10, 936.15 and
936.16.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
By letter dated November 26, 2008 (Administrative Record No. OK-
998), Oklahoma sent us a proposed amendment to its program under SMCRA
(30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). Oklahoma sent the amendment at its own
initiative. Below is a summary of the changes proposed by Oklahoma. Any
revisions that we do not specifically discuss below concern
nonsubstantive wording or editorial changes or corrections of cross-
references. They can be found in the full text document of the program
amendment, which is available for you to read at the locations listed
above under ADDRESSES.
Specifically, Oklahoma proposes to make the following revisions to
its program.
[[Page 869]]
A. Section 460:20-5-13--Appeals procedures [Revoked]
Oklahoma proposes to delete Appeals procedures for State employees.
(a) Employees have the right to appeal an order for remedial action
under Section 460:20-5-12, and shall have 30 days to exercise this
right before disciplinary action is initiated. Employees may file their
appeal, in writing, with the Appeals board established in Section
460:20-14 below.
(b) Members of advisory boards, the Oklahoma Mining Commission, and
commissions representing multiple interests should follow any appeals
process provided for by the Oklahoma Governor's Office, Director of
Appointments.
B. Section 460:20-5-14--Appeals board [Revoked]
Oklahoma proposes to delete the Appeals board for State employees.
A department appeals board, composed of three persons appointed by the
Director as representatives of the Department, shall hear any grievance
from Department personnel concerning termination, salary disputes,
conflict of interest, or other personnel matters which have been
determined by the Director.
(1) Any decisions rendered by the appeals board shall be a majority
vote, after both parties have had an opportunity to be heard in an
individual proceeding under the Administrative Procedures Act.
(2) Should the appeals board vote against the decision of the Chief
Administrative Officer, the matter shall be taken to the Director, and
his or her decision shall be considered a final order, appealable under
the Administrative Procedures Act.
C. Section 460:20-59-4--Notice of violation
Oklahoma proposes to make editorial changes by adopting language
similar to 30 CFR 843.12 (f)(1), which specifies the circumstances
which may qualify a surface coal mining operation for an abatement
period of more than 90 days. Oklahoma proposes new language at line
(F)(2) allowing for situations where the permittee of an ongoing
permitted operation has timely applied for and diligently pursued a
permit revision which abates an outstanding violation and which
includes no other changes to permit design or plans, but such revision
approval has not or will not be issued within 90 days for reasons not
within the control of the permittee.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it
will become part of the State program.
Written or Electronic Comments
Send your written or electronic comments to OSM at the address
given above. Your written comments should be specific, pertain only to
the issues proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in
support of your recommendations. We appreciate any and all comments,
but those most useful and likely to influence decisions on the final
regulations will be those that either involve personal experience or
include citations to and analyses of SMCRA, its legislative history,
its implementing regulations, case law, other pertinent Tribal or
Federal laws or regulations, technical literature, or other relevant
publications. We will not consider or respond to your comments when
developing the final rule if they are received after the close of the
comment period (see DATES). We will make every attempt to log all
comments into the administrative record, but comments delivered to an
address other than the Tulsa Field Office may not be logged in.
Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you may
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so. We will not consider anonymous comments.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4 p.m., c.s.t. on
January 26, 2009. If you are disabled and need reasonable
accommodations to attend a public hearing, contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We will arrange the location and
time of the hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no
one requests an opportunity to speak, we will not hold a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at the public hearing
provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to
speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the
audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you
will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will
end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak and others present in
the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If there is only limited interest in participating in a public
hearing, we may hold a public meeting rather than a public hearing. If
you wish to meet with us to discuss the amendment, please request a
meeting by contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All such meetings are open to the public and, if possible, we
will post notices of meetings at the locations listed under ADDRESSES.
We will make a written summary of each meeting a part of the
administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that this rule
meets the applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that
section. However, these standards are not applicable to the actual
language of State regulatory programs and program amendments because
each program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based solely on a determination of
whether the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its implementing
Federal regulations and whether the other requirements of 30 CFR parts
730, 731, and 732 have been met.
[[Page 870]]
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism implications. SMCRA delineates
the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations. One of
the purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to protect
society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal
mining operations.'' Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires that State
laws regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be ``in
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA, and section 503(a)(7)
requires that State programs contain rules and regulations ``consistent
with'' regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the
potential effects of this rule on Federally-recognized Indian tribes
and have determined that the rule does not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
This determination is based on the fact that the Oklahoma program does
not regulate coal exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation
operations on Indian lands. Therefore, the Oklahoma program has no
effect on Federally-recognized Indian tribes.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations that Significantly Affect the
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 which
requires agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for a rule
that is (1) considered significant under Executive Order 12866, and (2)
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because this rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not expected to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, a
statement of energy effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that
agency decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by the Office of Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. In making the determination as to whether this rule would
have a significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data
and assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) Does not
have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) Will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic
regions; and (c) Does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S. based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal regulation was not considered a
major rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any
given year. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal regulation did not impose an
unfunded mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 936
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: December 9, 2008.
William Joseph,
Acting Regional Director, Mid-Continent Region.
[FR Doc. E9-204 Filed 1-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P