Standards for Mortgagor's Investment in Mortgaged Property: Compliance With Court Order Vacating Final Rule, 80297-80298 [E8-31060]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 251 / Wednesday, December 31, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs
to comply with this AD and placed it in
the AD Docket. You may get a copy of
this summary at the address listed
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Under the authority delegated to me
by the Administrator, the Federal
Aviation Administration amends part 39
of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR part 39) as follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
■
2009–01–01 CFM International, S. A.:
Amendment 39–15779. Docket No.
FAA–2008–1353; Directorate Identifier
2008–NE–46–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective December 31, 2008.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Dec 30, 2008
Jkt 217001
Affected ADs
(b) None.
80297
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to CFM International,
S. A. CFM56–5B1, –5B2, –5B4, –5B5, –5B6,
–5B7, –5B1/P, –5B2/P, –5B3/P, –5B3/P1,
–5B4/P, –5B5/P, –5B6/P, –5B7/P, –5B8/P,
–5B9/P, –5B1/2P, –5B2/2P, –5B3/2P, –5B3/
2P1, –5B4/2P, –5B6/2P, –5B4/P1, –5B4/2P1,
and –5B9/2P turbofan engines. These engines
are installed on, but not limited to, Airbus
A318, A319, A320, and A321 series
airplanes.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from an Airbus A321
airplane powered by CFM56–5B1/P turbofan
engines experiencing high-pressure
compressor (HPC) stalls during climb out
after takeoff. We are issuing this AD to
prevent HPC stalls, which could prevent
continued safe flight or landing.
CFM56–5B S/B 72–0722, dated December 22,
2008, for related information.
(j) Contact CFM International, S. A.,
Technical Publications Department, 1
Neumann Way, Cincinnati, OH 45215;
telephone (513) 552–2800; fax (513) 552–
2816, for a copy of this service bulletin.
(k) Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France, for a
copy of the aircraft maintenance manual.
(l) Contact Stephen K. Sheely, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA,
Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; e-mail: stephen.k.sheely@faa.gov;
telephone (781) 238–7750; fax (781) 238–
7199, for more information about this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(m) None.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
(f) Within 14 days of the effective date of
this AD do the following:
(1) Review exhaust gas temperature (EGT)
monitoring records to determine EGT
deterioration margin.
(2) For airplanes where both engines have
greater than 80° centigrade (C) deterioration
of EGT margin, do the following:
(i) Borescope-inspect HPC stages 1, 3, 6,
and 9 of both engines. Information on
borescope inspection of the HPC can be
found in the aircraft maintenance manual.
(ii) Remove from service any engine that
does not pass the borescope inspection
requirements found in the aircraft
maintenance manual.
(iii) If both engines pass the borescope
inspection, then remove one of the engines
from service and replace it with an engine
that has 80 °C or less deterioration of EGT
margin.
(3) Continue monitoring EGT margin on
engines in service, to prevent two engines on
an airplane from having greater than 80 °C
deterioration of EGT margin. Information on
monitoring EGT can be found in CFM
International, S. A. Service Bulletin (SB) No.
CFM56–5B S/B 72–0722, dated December 22,
2008.
Interim Actions
(g) These actions are interim actions and
we anticipate further rulemaking actions in
the future, including further action to address
the remaining engines in service that are
above 80 °C deterioration of EGT margin.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(h) The Manager, Engine Certification
Office, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(i) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2008–0227–E, dated December 23,
2008, and CFM International, S. A. SB No.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
December 23, 2008.
Francis A. Favara,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–31189 Filed 12–30–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 203
[Docket No. FR–5087–F–05]
RIN 2502–AI52
Standards for Mortgagor’s Investment
in Mortgaged Property: Compliance
With Court Order Vacating Final Rule
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This final rule complies with
a court order to vacate HUD’s rule
entitled ‘‘Standards for Mortgagor’s
Investment in Mortgaged Property’’
published on October 1, 2007.
DATES: Effective Date: January 30, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Margaret Burns, Director, Office of
Single Family Program Development,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20410; telephone
number 202–708–2121 (this is not a tollfree number). Persons with hearing or
speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Information Relay Service
at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the February 29, 2008, order of the
U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of California in Nehemiah
Corporation of America v. Jackson, et
al., No. S–07–2056 (E.D. Cal.), and the
E:\FR\FM\31DER1.SGM
31DER1
80298
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 251 / Wednesday, December 31, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
March 5, 2008, order of the U.S. District
Court for the District of Columbia in
Ameridream Inc., et al., v. Jackson, No.
07–1752 (D.D.C.) and Penobscot Indian
Nation, et al., v. HUD, No. 07–1282
(D.D.C.), which vacated the final rule
entitled ‘‘Standards for Mortgagor’s
Investment in Mortgaged Property’’,
published on October 1, 2007 (72 FR
56002), this final rule removes the
regulation at 24 CFR 203.19, and
reserves § 203.19.
Findings and Certifications
Justification for Final Rulemaking
In general, HUD publishes a rule for
public comment before issuing a final
rule, in accordance with its own
regulations on rulemaking at 24 CFR
part 10. Part 10, however, does provide,
in § 10.1, for exceptions from that
general rule where the HUD finds good
cause to omit advance notice and public
participation. The good cause
requirement is satisfied when the prior
public procedure is ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ HUD finds that good cause
exists and prior public procedure is
unnecessary because HUD has no
discretion but to comply with the court
order to vacate the October 1, 2007, final
rule entitled, ‘‘Standards for Mortgagor’s
Investment in Mortgaged Property.’’
Public comment in this context would
serve no purpose and is, therefore,
unnecessary.
Environmental Review
A Finding of No Significant Impact
was not required for the October 1, 2007
final rule. Under 24 CFR 50.19(b)(6),
that rule was categorically excluded
from the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332 et seq.) and that categorical
exclusion continues to apply.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number for the principal
Federal Housing Administration (FHA)
single family mortgage insurance
program is 14.117. This rule also applies
through cross-referencing to FHA
mortgage insurance for condominium
units (14.133), and other smaller single
family programs.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES
List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 203
Loan programs—housing and
community development, Mortgage
insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, the Department amends
24 CFR part 203, as follows:
■
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:52 Dec 30, 2008
Jkt 217001
PART 203—SINGLE FAMILY
MORTGAGE INSURANCE
1. The authority citation for part 203
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1709, 1710, 1715b,
1715z–16, and 1715u; 42 U.S.C. 3535(d).
§ 203.19
[Removed and Reserved]
2. Section 203.19 is removed and
reserved.
■
Dated: December 19, 2008.
Ronald Y. Spraker,
Acting General Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Housing—Acting Deputy Federal Housing
Commissioner.
[FR Doc. E8–31060 Filed 12–30–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[USCG–2008–0864]
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Raritan River, Arthur Kill, and Their
Tributaries, New Jersey
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations; request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast
Guard District, has issued a new
temporary deviation from the regulation
governing the operation of the Arthur
Kill (AK) Railroad Bridge across Arthur
Kill at mile 11.6 between Staten Island,
New York and Elizabeth, New Jersey.
This deviation is necessary to test a new
operating rule for the bridge that will
help determine the most equitable and
safe solution to facilitate the present and
anticipated needs of navigation and rail
traffic. This deviation requires the AK
Railroad Bridge to remain in the open
position but allows the bridge owner/
operator to schedule short bridge
closure periods after first broadcasting
advance notice to the marine
community. This change from the
previous deviation will consider the
needs of navigation and allow marine
interests to adjust their schedules
around the bridge closure periods.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
12:01 a.m. on December 15, 2008
through June 12, 2009. Comments must
be received by January 31, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2008–
0864 and are available online at
https://www.regulations.gov. They are
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
also available for inspection or copying
at two locations: The Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays, and the First
Coast Guard District, Battery Park
Building, One South Street, New York,
NY 10004 between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Gary Kassof, Bridge Branch, (212) 668–
7165.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Arthur Kill Railroad Bridge (AK RR) has
a vertical clearance of 31 feet at mean
high water and 35 feet at mean low
water in the closed position. The owner
of the bridge, New York City Economic
Development Corporation (NYCEDC),
began a bridge rehabilitation program
approximately 10 years ago, as part of
the region’s Full Freight Access
Initiative.
Part of the Full Freight Access
Initiative was to restore rail freight
service across the bridge to and from the
Staten Island Landfill facility (SIL) and
the New York Container Terminal
(formerly the Howland Hook Terminal).
The AK Railroad Bridge rehabilitation
project was completed in 2007 in
anticipation of renewed rail operations
requiring the passage of train traffic
across the bridge. Trash trains have been
traveling to and from the SIL since June
2007 and the revitalized New York
Container Terminal has been receiving
railroad freight traffic for the past year.
The operating rule for this bridge
found at 33 CFR 117.747 is no longer
applicable or necessary as it pertains to
the AK RR because the AK RR had been
maintained in the open position until
last year due to the cessation of all
railroad train traffic over the bridge.
Background and Purpose
Beginning with a temporary deviation
entitled ‘‘Drawbridge Operation
Regulations; Raritan River, Arthur Kill,
and Their Tributaries, NJ’’ published on
March 20, 2007 in the Federal Register
(72 FR 12981), the Coast Guard
published a series of three temporary
deviations to test a variety of bridge
operation schedules culminating in the
most recent test deviation published on
June 3, 2008 (73 FR 31610). The
proposed and final temporary deviation
will confirm the lessons learned from
the previous tests, namely that shorter
bridge closure periods complemented
by close coordination between the
E:\FR\FM\31DER1.SGM
31DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 251 (Wednesday, December 31, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 80297-80298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-31060]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 203
[Docket No. FR-5087-F-05]
RIN 2502-AI52
Standards for Mortgagor's Investment in Mortgaged Property:
Compliance With Court Order Vacating Final Rule
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule complies with a court order to vacate HUD's
rule entitled ``Standards for Mortgagor's Investment in Mortgaged
Property'' published on October 1, 2007.
DATES: Effective Date: January 30, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret Burns, Director, Office of
Single Family Program Development, Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone
number 202-708-2121 (this is not a toll-free number). Persons with
hearing or speech impairments may access this number through TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at 800-877-
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the February 29, 2008, order of
the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California in
Nehemiah Corporation of America v. Jackson, et al., No. S-07-2056 (E.D.
Cal.), and the
[[Page 80298]]
March 5, 2008, order of the U.S. District Court for the District of
Columbia in Ameridream Inc., et al., v. Jackson, No. 07-1752 (D.D.C.)
and Penobscot Indian Nation, et al., v. HUD, No. 07-1282 (D.D.C.),
which vacated the final rule entitled ``Standards for Mortgagor's
Investment in Mortgaged Property'', published on October 1, 2007 (72 FR
56002), this final rule removes the regulation at 24 CFR 203.19, and
reserves Sec. 203.19.
Findings and Certifications
Justification for Final Rulemaking
In general, HUD publishes a rule for public comment before issuing
a final rule, in accordance with its own regulations on rulemaking at
24 CFR part 10. Part 10, however, does provide, in Sec. 10.1, for
exceptions from that general rule where the HUD finds good cause to
omit advance notice and public participation. The good cause
requirement is satisfied when the prior public procedure is
``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' HUD
finds that good cause exists and prior public procedure is unnecessary
because HUD has no discretion but to comply with the court order to
vacate the October 1, 2007, final rule entitled, ``Standards for
Mortgagor's Investment in Mortgaged Property.'' Public comment in this
context would serve no purpose and is, therefore, unnecessary.
Environmental Review
A Finding of No Significant Impact was not required for the October
1, 2007 final rule. Under 24 CFR 50.19(b)(6), that rule was
categorically excluded from the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332 et seq.) and that categorical
exclusion continues to apply.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number for the principal
Federal Housing Administration (FHA) single family mortgage insurance
program is 14.117. This rule also applies through cross-referencing to
FHA mortgage insurance for condominium units (14.133), and other
smaller single family programs.
List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 203
Loan programs--housing and community development, Mortgage
insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
0
Accordingly, the Department amends 24 CFR part 203, as follows:
PART 203--SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE INSURANCE
0
1. The authority citation for part 203 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1709, 1710, 1715b, 1715z-16, and 1715u; 42
U.S.C. 3535(d).
Sec. 203.19 [Removed and Reserved]
0
2. Section 203.19 is removed and reserved.
Dated: December 19, 2008.
Ronald Y. Spraker,
Acting General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Housing--Acting Deputy
Federal Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. E8-31060 Filed 12-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P