2015 Resource Pool, 79878-79880 [E8-30968]
Download as PDF
79878
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 250 / Tuesday, December 30, 2008 / Notices
No. 0204–108, as amended, was
rescinded and subsequently replaced by
Delegation Orders 00–037.00 (December
6, 2001) and 00–001–00C (January 31,
2007). The Deputy Secretary issued this
rate order pursuant to said delegations.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Background
The Sam Rayburn Dam (Rayburn) is
located on the Angelina River in the
State of Texas in the Neches River
Basin. Since the beginning of its
operation in 1965, it has been marketed
as an isolated project, under contract
with Sam Rayburn Dam Electric
Cooperative, Inc. (SRDEC) (Contract No.
DE–PM75–92SW00215). SRDEC is
comprised of two separate entities, the
Sam Rayburn G&T, and the Sam
Rayburn Municipal Power Agency.
In the FERC Docket No. EF07–4021–
000 (122 FERC ¶ 62196), issued
February 29, 2008, for the period
October 1, 2007, through September 30,
2011, the FERC confirmed and approved
the current annual Rayburn rate of
$3,456,696). However, the current rate is
inadequate to meet cost recovery criteria
for the period January 1, 2009 through
September 30, 2012.
Discussion
Southwestern’s 2008 Current Power
Repayment Study (PRS) indicates that
the existing annual power rate of
$3,456,696 does not represent the
lowest possible rate needed to meet cost
recovery criteria. The increased revenue
requirement is due to an increase in the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
projected operations and maintenance
costs. The Revised PRS indicates that an
increase in annual revenues of $493,176
beginning January 1, 2009, is sufficient
to accomplish repayment of the Federal
investment in the required number of
years. Accordingly, Southwestern
developed a proposed rate schedule
based on that increased revenue
requirement.
Title 10, Part 903, Subpart A of the
Code of Federal Regulations,
‘‘Procedures for Public Participation in
Power and Transmission Rate
Adjustments and Extensions,’’ has been
followed in connection with the
proposed rate adjustment. More
specifically, opportunities for public
review and comment during a 30-day
period on the proposed Rayburn power
rate were announced by a Federal
Register (73 FR 65306) notice published
on November 3, 2008. A Public
Information and Comment Forum was
scheduled to be held November 18,
2008, in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The forum
was canceled as no one expressed an
intention to participate. Written
comments were due by December 3,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
00:29 Dec 30, 2008
Jkt 217001
2008. Southwestern provided the
Federal Register notice, together with
requested supporting data, to the
customer and interested parties for
review and comment during the formal
period of public participation. In
addition, prior to the formal 30-day
public participation process,
Southwestern discussed with the
customer representatives the
preliminary information on the
proposed rate adjustment. Only one
formal comment was received from
Gillis & Angley, LLP, Counsellors at
Law, on behalf of Sam Rayburn
Municipal Power Agency, Vinton Public
Power Authority, Sam Rayburn G&T
and the Sam Rayburn Dam Electric
Cooperative, Inc., which stated that they
had no objection to the proposed rate
adjustment.
Upon conclusion of the comment
period in December 2008, Southwestern
finalized the PRS and rate schedule for
the proposed annual rate of $3,949,872,
which is the lowest possible rate needed
to satisfy repayment criteria. This rate
represents an annual increase of 14.3
percent.
Availability of Information
Information regarding this rate
increase, including studies and other
supporting material, is available for
public review and comment in the
offices of Southwestern Power
Administration, One West Third Street,
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103.
Environment
The environmental impact of the rate
increase proposal was evaluated in
consideration of DOE’s guidelines for
implementing the procedural provisions
of the National Environmental Policy
Act, 10 CFR 1021, and was determined
to fall within the class of actions that are
categorically excluded from the
requirements of preparing either an
Environmental Impact Statement or an
Environmental Assessment.
Order
In view of the foregoing and pursuant
to the authority delegated to me, I
hereby confirm, approve and place in
effect on an interim basis, for the period
January 1, 2009, through September 30,
2012, the annual Sam Rayburn Dam rate
of $3,949,872 for the sale of power and
energy from Sam Rayburn Dam to the
Sam Rayburn Dam Electric Cooperative,
Inc., under Contract No. DE–PM75–
92SW00215, dated October 7, 1992.
This rate shall remain in effect on an
interim basis through September 30,
2012, or until the FERC confirms and
approves the rate on a final basis.
Dated: December 17, 2008.
Jeffrey F. Kupfer,
Acting Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–30967 Filed 12–29–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Western Area Power Administration
Comments and Responses
Southwestern received one written
comment in which the customer
representative expressed no objection to
the proposed rate adjustment.
Other Issues
There were no other issues raised
during the informal period or during the
formal public participation period.
Administrator’s Certification
The 2008 Revised Rayburn PRS
indicates that the annual power rate of
$3,949,872 will repay all costs of the
project, including amortization of the
power investment consistent with
provisions of the Department of Energy
(DOE) Order No. RA 6120.2. In
accordance with Delegation Order Nos.
00–037.00 (December 6, 2001) and 00–
001.00C (January 31, 2007), and Section
5 of the Flood Control Act of 1944, the
Administrator has determined that the
proposed Rayburn power rate is
consistent with applicable law and the
lowest possible rate consistent with
sound business principles.
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2015 Resource Pool
AGENCY: Western Area Power
Administration, DOE.
ACTION: Notice of Final 2015 Resource
Pool Size and Revised Eligibility
Criteria.
SUMMARY: The Western Area Power
Administration (Western), a Federal
power marketing agency of the U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE), published
its 2004 Power Marketing Plan
(Marketing Plan) for Western’s Sierra
Nevada Customer Service Region (SNR)
in the Federal Register on June 25, 1999
(64 FR 34417). The Marketing Plan
specifies the terms and conditions
under which Western will market power
from the Central Valley Project (CVP)
and the Washoe Project beginning
January 1, 2005, and continuing through
December 31, 2024. The Marketing Plan
provides for a 2015 Resource Pool of up
to 2 percent of SNR’s marketable power
resources. The 2015 Resource Pool will
be available for power allocations to
preference entities that meet the
Eligibility Criteria. Western published
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 250 / Tuesday, December 30, 2008 / Notices
its Proposed 2015 Resource Pool Size
and Revised Eligibility Criteria in the
Federal Register on May 5, 2008 (73 FR
24592). This notice responds to the
comments received on the Proposed
2015 Resource Pool Size and Revised
Eligibility Criteria and sets forth the
Final 2015 Resource Pool Size and
Revised Eligibility Criteria.
This Federal Register notice is not a
call for applications for Federal power
allocations. Preference entities who
wish to apply for an allocation of power
from SNR must submit formal
applications in response to Western’s
Call for 2015 Resource Pool
Applications to be published under a
separate notice. Application procedures
will be set forth in the Call for 2015
Resource Pool Applications.
DATES: The Final 2015 Resource Pool
Size and Revised Eligibility Criteria will
become effective January 29, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Jeanne Haas, Power Contracts and
Energy Services Manager, Sierra Nevada
Customer Service Region, Western Area
Power Administration, 114 Parkshore
Drive, Folsom, CA 95630–4710, (916)
353–4438, e-mail haas@wapa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
As discussed in Western’s May 5,
2008, Federal Register notice for the
Proposed 2015 Resource Pool Size and
Revised Eligibility Criteria, the
Marketing Plan describes how SNR will
market its power resources beginning
January 1, 2005, through December 31,
2024. During this period, the Marketing
Plan requires Western to establish and
allocate a 2015 Resource Pool. The
Marketing Plan provides Western with
discretion to reduce all Customers’
allocations by up to 2 percent to
establish the 2015 Resource Pool. As
more fully described in the May 5, 2008,
Federal Register notice, as part of this
public process, Western proposed: (1)
To reduce all existing Customers’
allocation by the full 2 percent and (2)
to revise the Eligibility Criteria by
deleting the following language:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Existing Customers may apply for a
resource pool allocation if their Extension
CRD, set forth in Appendix A [of the
Marketing Plan Federal Register 64 FR
34417], is not more than 15 percent of their
peak load in the calendar year prior to the
Call for Applications, and not more than 10
MW.
Western started the public process for
the 2015 Resource Pool in May 2008 to
ensure that customers have adequate
time to secure power and delivery
arrangements to start on January 1,
2015.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
00:29 Dec 30, 2008
Jkt 217001
The Marketing Plan continues to
remain in full force and effect and will
govern the formal allocation process.
The size of the 2015 Resource Pool will
reflect the outcome of this public
process. Additionally, Western will
apply the revised Eligibility Criteria
developed through this process for
applications received during the 2015
Resource Pool allocation.
This Federal Register notice is not a
call for applications for Federal power
allocations. Entities interested in an
allocation of power from SNR must
apply pursuant to the Call for 2015
Resource Pool Applications to be
published in a separate Federal Register
notice. Preference entities who wish to
apply for an allocation of power from
SNR must submit formal applications in
response to Western’s Call for 2015
Resource Pool Applications to be
published under a separate Federal
Register notice. The application
information and procedures will be set
forth in that Federal Register notice.
Acronyms and Definitions
CRD: Contract Rate of Delivery: The
maximum amount of capacity made
available to a Customer for a period
specified under a contract.
Customer: A preference customer who
has a contract to purchase power under
the Marketing Plan.
Eligibility Criteria: Conditions that
must be met to qualify for an allocation.
Existing Customer: A preference
customer who had a contract to
purchase firm power offered under a
previous allocation process or
Marketing Plan that extended through
December 31, 2004. Note: The definition
includes those entities who succeeded
in interest to an Existing Customer; e.g.,
if Western approved the assignment of
an Existing Customer’s Federal power
allocation to another preference
customer, the assigned Federal power
falls within the definition.
Extension CRD: An Existing
Customer’s CRD exclusive of diversity
and curtailable power and peaking/
excess capacity, as it may be adjusted in
accordance with the Marketing Plan.
Responses to Comments Received on
the Notice of Proposed 2015 Resource
Pool Size and Revised Eligibility
Criteria (73 FR 24592, May 5, 2008)
During the public consultation and
comment period, Western received nine
letters commenting on the proposal. In
addition, two customer and interested
party representatives commented during
the May 21, 2008, public comment
forum. In preparing the Final 2015
Resource Pool Size and Revised
Eligibility Criteria, Western reviewed
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
79879
and considered all comments it received
during the public comment period. The
comment period closed on July 7, 2008.
The following is a summary of the
comments received and Western’s
responses to those comments. Western
grouped the comments by subject and
paraphrased them for brevity. Specific
comments are used for clarification
where necessary.
2015 Resource Pool Size Comments and
Responses
Comment: Three commentors
supported the full 2 percent reduction
in customer allocations to establish the
2015 Resource Pool.
Response: Western notes the
comments. The full 2 percent reduction
in all customers’ Base Resource
percentage to provide for a 2015
Resource Pool will promote widespread
use of Federal power.
Eligibility Criteria Comments and
Responses
Comment: A commentor supported
the proposal to delete the criterion
because the formula, which is based on
an Existing Customer’s Extension CRD,
is no longer applicable.
Response: Western notes the comment
and agrees that because Existing
Customers no longer have CRDs, and
CRDs are not allocated under this
Marketing Plan, the criterion is no
longer applicable.
Comment: Two commentors
supported deleting the criterion in order
to ensure full subscription of Western’s
resources.
Response: Western notes the comment
and agrees that the criterion, if used,
may be too restrictive to ensure full
subscription of Western’s resources. In
addition, Western believes that if this
criterion is not deleted, it would
unfairly disadvantage Existing
Customers by subjecting them to a
criterion that only applies to that
customer class, while customers that
received an allocation under the 2005
Resource Pool would be exempt.
Comment: A commentor objected to
deleting the criterion. The commentor
suggested the continued application of
the existing criterion will ensure
Western’s resources will be equitably
allocated to a variety of customers.
Response: CRDs were used in
Western’s marketing plans previous to
this Marketing Plan as a measurement of
capacity allocated to a customer. Under
the current Marketing Plan, customers
are allocated a percentage of the
generation available after Western meets
certain other obligations. Western used
Extension CRDs initially only to
calculate a percentage for Existing
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
79880
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 250 / Tuesday, December 30, 2008 / Notices
Customers. CRDs and Extension CRDs
are obsolete and not applicable under
the 2015 reallocation. Western is
committed to its mission to provide
wide-spread use of its power resources.
Removal of this criterion will not
prevent Western from equitably
allocating its resources among potential
customers.
Comment: Three commentors
suggested modifying the criterion’s
formula to be based on Base Resource
percentages rather than Extension CRDs.
Response: If Western were to modify
the criterion to be based on Base
Resource percentages as the
commentors suggest, Western believes
that the criterion is unfairly restrictive
and may not ensure full subscription of
its power resources. Western does not
want to continue to put any type of
criterion in place that unfairly limits the
ability of any existing customers to
apply for an allocation of the 2015
Resource Pool.
Comment: A commentor supported
deleting the criterion and replacing it
with a new criterion under which only
Existing Customers who have a
substantial percentage of qualified
renewable energy in their power
portfolio would be qualified to apply for
a 2015 Resource Pool allocation.
Response: Although Western supports
those customers who have substantial
qualified renewable energy assets, a
renewable portfolio is not a criteria to
receive an allocation. Western feels that
to put such a restriction on preference
entities may unfairly limit some from
receiving an allocation of Base
Resource.
Comment: A commentor suggested
modifying the criterion to recognize the
relative size of a Western allocation
compared to a customer’s load.
Response: Western believes the best
method to ensure full subscription of its
resources is to maintain wide discretion
in the Eligibility Criteria. However, in
determining allocations, Western may
consider various factors relative to the
allocation including the size of a
customer’s load compared to its existing
allocation.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Establishing the 2015 Resource Pool
Size
Western has established the pool size
for its 2015 Resource Pool taking into
consideration all of the comments
received during the comment period.
The 2015 Resource Pool will be
established by reducing all customers’
Base Resource by exactly 2 percent. In
choosing to set the Resource Pool at 2
percent, Western is creating the largest
possible resource pool allowed under
VerDate Aug<31>2005
00:29 Dec 30, 2008
Jkt 217001
the Marketing Plan and promoting the
most wide-spread use of its resources.
Revisions to the Eligibility Criteria
Western has revised the Eligibility
Criteria taking into consideration the
comments received during the comment
period and public forums. The revision
is summarized below.
The Eligibility Criterion provides that:
Existing Customers may apply for a
resource pool allocation if their Extension
CRD, set forth in Appendix A [of the
Marketing Plan Federal Register 64 FR
34417], is not more than 15 percent of their
peak load in the calendar year prior to the
Call for Applications, and not more than 10
MW is no longer applicable.
Western believes this criterion is outof-date because Western no longer uses
CRDs or Extension CRDs. In addition,
Western no longer allocates its resources
via a fixed power amount but, rather,
allocates a percentage of its generation.
Using a 10-megawatt limit on a fixed
amount of power as a prerequisite to
applying for power is not practical
under the current Marketing Plan.
Therefore, Section IV.B.2.g. is deleted
from the Marketing Plan.
within the range of alternatives
considered in the 2004 EIS. This NEPA
review identified and analyzed
environmental effects related to the
Marketing Plan. This action falls within
the Marketing Plan and, thus, is covered
by the 2004 EIS.
Determination Under Executive Order
12866
Western has an exemption from
centralized regulatory review under
Executive Order 12866; accordingly, no
clearance of this notice by the Office of
Management and Budget is required.
Dated: December 15, 2008.
Timothy J. Meeks,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E8–30968 Filed 12–29–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting; Open
Commission Meeting Via Conference
Call; Tuesday, December 30, 2008
Authorities
December 23, 2008.
The Marketing Plan for marketing
power by SNR after 2004, published in
the Federal Register (64 FR 34417) on
June 25, 1999, was established pursuant
to the DOE Organization Act (42 U.S.C.
7101–7352); the Reclamation Act of
June 17, 1902 (ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388),
as amended and supplemented by
subsequent enactments, particularly
section 9(c) of the Reclamation Project
Act of 1939 (43 U.S.C. 485 h(c)); and
other acts specifically applicable to the
projects involved. This action falls
within the Marketing Plan and, thus, is
covered by the same authority.
The Federal Communications
Commission will hold an open meeting
via a conference call regarding
Commission announcements, Tuesday,
December 30, 2008, which is scheduled
to commence at 11 a.m.
Meeting participants can listen to the
‘‘audio only’’ of the meeting by:
Regulatory Procedure Requirements
Environmental Compliance
In compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.); the
Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for implementing NEPA (40
CFR Parts 1500–1508); and DOE NEPA
implementing regulations (10 CFR Part
1021), Western completed an
environmental impact statement (EIS)
on its Energy Planning and Management
Program. The Record of Decision was
published in the Federal Register (60
FR 53181, October 12, 1995). Western
also completed the 2004 Power
Marketing Program EIS (2004 EIS), and
the Record of Decision was published in
the Federal Register (62 FR 22934, April
28, 1997). The Marketing Plan falls
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
—Visiting Room TW–C305, at 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC (sign
language interpreters, open
captioning, and assistive listening
devices will be provided on site);
—Calling 1–888–603–9685 and using
pass code 3950472. Call in capacity
may be limited depending on the
volume of calls. Callers may call the
toll free number up to ten minutes
before the scheduled meeting time; or
—Accessing the FCC’s Audio/Video
Events Web page at https://
www.fcc.gov/realaudio (with open
captioning over the Internet).
Additional information concerning this
meeting may be obtained from Audrey
Spivack or David Fiske, Office of Media
Relations, (202) 418–0500; TTY 1–888–
835–5322.
Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–31141 Filed 12–24–08; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 250 (Tuesday, December 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79878-79880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-30968]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Western Area Power Administration
2015 Resource Pool
AGENCY: Western Area Power Administration, DOE.
ACTION: Notice of Final 2015 Resource Pool Size and Revised Eligibility
Criteria.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Western Area Power Administration (Western), a Federal
power marketing agency of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE),
published its 2004 Power Marketing Plan (Marketing Plan) for Western's
Sierra Nevada Customer Service Region (SNR) in the Federal Register on
June 25, 1999 (64 FR 34417). The Marketing Plan specifies the terms and
conditions under which Western will market power from the Central
Valley Project (CVP) and the Washoe Project beginning January 1, 2005,
and continuing through December 31, 2024. The Marketing Plan provides
for a 2015 Resource Pool of up to 2 percent of SNR's marketable power
resources. The 2015 Resource Pool will be available for power
allocations to preference entities that meet the Eligibility Criteria.
Western published
[[Page 79879]]
its Proposed 2015 Resource Pool Size and Revised Eligibility Criteria
in the Federal Register on May 5, 2008 (73 FR 24592). This notice
responds to the comments received on the Proposed 2015 Resource Pool
Size and Revised Eligibility Criteria and sets forth the Final 2015
Resource Pool Size and Revised Eligibility Criteria.
This Federal Register notice is not a call for applications for
Federal power allocations. Preference entities who wish to apply for an
allocation of power from SNR must submit formal applications in
response to Western's Call for 2015 Resource Pool Applications to be
published under a separate notice. Application procedures will be set
forth in the Call for 2015 Resource Pool Applications.
DATES: The Final 2015 Resource Pool Size and Revised Eligibility
Criteria will become effective January 29, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jeanne Haas, Power Contracts and
Energy Services Manager, Sierra Nevada Customer Service Region, Western
Area Power Administration, 114 Parkshore Drive, Folsom, CA 95630-4710,
(916) 353-4438, e-mail haas@wapa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
As discussed in Western's May 5, 2008, Federal Register notice for
the Proposed 2015 Resource Pool Size and Revised Eligibility Criteria,
the Marketing Plan describes how SNR will market its power resources
beginning January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2024. During this
period, the Marketing Plan requires Western to establish and allocate a
2015 Resource Pool. The Marketing Plan provides Western with discretion
to reduce all Customers' allocations by up to 2 percent to establish
the 2015 Resource Pool. As more fully described in the May 5, 2008,
Federal Register notice, as part of this public process, Western
proposed: (1) To reduce all existing Customers' allocation by the full
2 percent and (2) to revise the Eligibility Criteria by deleting the
following language:
Existing Customers may apply for a resource pool allocation if
their Extension CRD, set forth in Appendix A [of the Marketing Plan
Federal Register 64 FR 34417], is not more than 15 percent of their
peak load in the calendar year prior to the Call for Applications,
and not more than 10 MW.
Western started the public process for the 2015 Resource Pool in May
2008 to ensure that customers have adequate time to secure power and
delivery arrangements to start on January 1, 2015.
The Marketing Plan continues to remain in full force and effect and
will govern the formal allocation process. The size of the 2015
Resource Pool will reflect the outcome of this public process.
Additionally, Western will apply the revised Eligibility Criteria
developed through this process for applications received during the
2015 Resource Pool allocation.
This Federal Register notice is not a call for applications for
Federal power allocations. Entities interested in an allocation of
power from SNR must apply pursuant to the Call for 2015 Resource Pool
Applications to be published in a separate Federal Register notice.
Preference entities who wish to apply for an allocation of power from
SNR must submit formal applications in response to Western's Call for
2015 Resource Pool Applications to be published under a separate
Federal Register notice. The application information and procedures
will be set forth in that Federal Register notice.
Acronyms and Definitions
CRD: Contract Rate of Delivery: The maximum amount of capacity made
available to a Customer for a period specified under a contract.
Customer: A preference customer who has a contract to purchase
power under the Marketing Plan.
Eligibility Criteria: Conditions that must be met to qualify for an
allocation.
Existing Customer: A preference customer who had a contract to
purchase firm power offered under a previous allocation process or
Marketing Plan that extended through December 31, 2004. Note: The
definition includes those entities who succeeded in interest to an
Existing Customer; e.g., if Western approved the assignment of an
Existing Customer's Federal power allocation to another preference
customer, the assigned Federal power falls within the definition.
Extension CRD: An Existing Customer's CRD exclusive of diversity
and curtailable power and peaking/excess capacity, as it may be
adjusted in accordance with the Marketing Plan.
Responses to Comments Received on the Notice of Proposed 2015 Resource
Pool Size and Revised Eligibility Criteria (73 FR 24592, May 5, 2008)
During the public consultation and comment period, Western received
nine letters commenting on the proposal. In addition, two customer and
interested party representatives commented during the May 21, 2008,
public comment forum. In preparing the Final 2015 Resource Pool Size
and Revised Eligibility Criteria, Western reviewed and considered all
comments it received during the public comment period. The comment
period closed on July 7, 2008.
The following is a summary of the comments received and Western's
responses to those comments. Western grouped the comments by subject
and paraphrased them for brevity. Specific comments are used for
clarification where necessary.
2015 Resource Pool Size Comments and Responses
Comment: Three commentors supported the full 2 percent reduction in
customer allocations to establish the 2015 Resource Pool.
Response: Western notes the comments. The full 2 percent reduction
in all customers' Base Resource percentage to provide for a 2015
Resource Pool will promote widespread use of Federal power.
Eligibility Criteria Comments and Responses
Comment: A commentor supported the proposal to delete the criterion
because the formula, which is based on an Existing Customer's Extension
CRD, is no longer applicable.
Response: Western notes the comment and agrees that because
Existing Customers no longer have CRDs, and CRDs are not allocated
under this Marketing Plan, the criterion is no longer applicable.
Comment: Two commentors supported deleting the criterion in order
to ensure full subscription of Western's resources.
Response: Western notes the comment and agrees that the criterion,
if used, may be too restrictive to ensure full subscription of
Western's resources. In addition, Western believes that if this
criterion is not deleted, it would unfairly disadvantage Existing
Customers by subjecting them to a criterion that only applies to that
customer class, while customers that received an allocation under the
2005 Resource Pool would be exempt.
Comment: A commentor objected to deleting the criterion. The
commentor suggested the continued application of the existing criterion
will ensure Western's resources will be equitably allocated to a
variety of customers.
Response: CRDs were used in Western's marketing plans previous to
this Marketing Plan as a measurement of capacity allocated to a
customer. Under the current Marketing Plan, customers are allocated a
percentage of the generation available after Western meets certain
other obligations. Western used Extension CRDs initially only to
calculate a percentage for Existing
[[Page 79880]]
Customers. CRDs and Extension CRDs are obsolete and not applicable
under the 2015 reallocation. Western is committed to its mission to
provide wide-spread use of its power resources. Removal of this
criterion will not prevent Western from equitably allocating its
resources among potential customers.
Comment: Three commentors suggested modifying the criterion's
formula to be based on Base Resource percentages rather than Extension
CRDs.
Response: If Western were to modify the criterion to be based on
Base Resource percentages as the commentors suggest, Western believes
that the criterion is unfairly restrictive and may not ensure full
subscription of its power resources. Western does not want to continue
to put any type of criterion in place that unfairly limits the ability
of any existing customers to apply for an allocation of the 2015
Resource Pool.
Comment: A commentor supported deleting the criterion and replacing
it with a new criterion under which only Existing Customers who have a
substantial percentage of qualified renewable energy in their power
portfolio would be qualified to apply for a 2015 Resource Pool
allocation.
Response: Although Western supports those customers who have
substantial qualified renewable energy assets, a renewable portfolio is
not a criteria to receive an allocation. Western feels that to put such
a restriction on preference entities may unfairly limit some from
receiving an allocation of Base Resource.
Comment: A commentor suggested modifying the criterion to recognize
the relative size of a Western allocation compared to a customer's
load.
Response: Western believes the best method to ensure full
subscription of its resources is to maintain wide discretion in the
Eligibility Criteria. However, in determining allocations, Western may
consider various factors relative to the allocation including the size
of a customer's load compared to its existing allocation.
Establishing the 2015 Resource Pool Size
Western has established the pool size for its 2015 Resource Pool
taking into consideration all of the comments received during the
comment period. The 2015 Resource Pool will be established by reducing
all customers' Base Resource by exactly 2 percent. In choosing to set
the Resource Pool at 2 percent, Western is creating the largest
possible resource pool allowed under the Marketing Plan and promoting
the most wide-spread use of its resources.
Revisions to the Eligibility Criteria
Western has revised the Eligibility Criteria taking into
consideration the comments received during the comment period and
public forums. The revision is summarized below.
The Eligibility Criterion provides that:
Existing Customers may apply for a resource pool allocation if
their Extension CRD, set forth in Appendix A [of the Marketing Plan
Federal Register 64 FR 34417], is not more than 15 percent of their
peak load in the calendar year prior to the Call for Applications,
and not more than 10 MW is no longer applicable.
Western believes this criterion is out-of-date because Western no
longer uses CRDs or Extension CRDs. In addition, Western no longer
allocates its resources via a fixed power amount but, rather, allocates
a percentage of its generation. Using a 10-megawatt limit on a fixed
amount of power as a prerequisite to applying for power is not
practical under the current Marketing Plan. Therefore, Section
IV.B.2.g. is deleted from the Marketing Plan.
Authorities
The Marketing Plan for marketing power by SNR after 2004, published
in the Federal Register (64 FR 34417) on June 25, 1999, was established
pursuant to the DOE Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7101-7352); the
Reclamation Act of June 17, 1902 (ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388), as amended
and supplemented by subsequent enactments, particularly section 9(c) of
the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 (43 U.S.C. 485 h(c)); and other
acts specifically applicable to the projects involved. This action
falls within the Marketing Plan and, thus, is covered by the same
authority.
Regulatory Procedure Requirements
Environmental Compliance
In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.); the Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for implementing NEPA (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508); and DOE
NEPA implementing regulations (10 CFR Part 1021), Western completed an
environmental impact statement (EIS) on its Energy Planning and
Management Program. The Record of Decision was published in the Federal
Register (60 FR 53181, October 12, 1995). Western also completed the
2004 Power Marketing Program EIS (2004 EIS), and the Record of Decision
was published in the Federal Register (62 FR 22934, April 28, 1997).
The Marketing Plan falls within the range of alternatives considered in
the 2004 EIS. This NEPA review identified and analyzed environmental
effects related to the Marketing Plan. This action falls within the
Marketing Plan and, thus, is covered by the 2004 EIS.
Determination Under Executive Order 12866
Western has an exemption from centralized regulatory review under
Executive Order 12866; accordingly, no clearance of this notice by the
Office of Management and Budget is required.
Dated: December 15, 2008.
Timothy J. Meeks,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E8-30968 Filed 12-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P