Dry Cargo Residue Discharges in the Great Lakes; Preparation of Environmental Impact Statement, 79496-79498 [E8-30804]
Download as PDF
79496
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 249 / Monday, December 29, 2008 / Notices
Dated: December 18, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E8–30839 Filed 12–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
[Docket No. USCG–2008–1229]
Chemical Transportation Advisory
Committee
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice seeking public comments
on MARPOL Reception Facilities.
AGENCY:
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Chemical Transportation
Advisory Committee (CTAC), through
its Working Group on the International
Convention for the Prevention of
Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) Annex,
has been tasked with providing
comment and recommendations to the
U.S. Coast Guard for optimizing
domestic MARPOL port reception
facilities. CTAC is a committee formed
under the authority of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5
U.S.C. App. (Pub. L. 92–463). To assist
and complement CTAC’s efforts, the
Coast Guard is hereby seeking
comments from the public on MARPOL
reception facilities in the U.S. The Coast
Guard is specifically interested in
identifying all issues that negatively
impact MARPOL implementing
regulations for port reception facilities;
and recommendations to address those
issues.
CTAC Tasking: The original Task
Statement that was provided to CTAC at
the April 24, 2008 meeting in
Washington, DC, included the
following:
1. Provide comments and
recommendations as necessary on: (To
be completed by the Spring of 2009)
• Impact, if any, on MARPOL
compliance caused by a variance in
disposal costs;
• Impact, if any, on MARPOL
compliance caused by vessels having to
shift berths to complete transfers;
• Plan to document MARPOL
reception facility services required and
received through an advanced notice of
arrival and departure report;
• Disposal of residues at other than
those facilities receiving the cargo
related to those residues. Vessels
currently have limited information on
availability of Annex I and Annex II
facilities at subsequent ports of call;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:19 Dec 24, 2008
Jkt 217001
• Level of consistency in disposal
procedures in fulfillment of federal,
state and local MARPOL waste disposal
requirements as well as operational
variances among facilities. For example,
in fulfillment of state requirements,
some facilities may request preidentification of constituents in Annex
I as well as Annex II residues.
Additionally, facilities themselves have
differing disposal procedures; and,
• Feasibility of simultaneous
MARPOL and cargo transfers at every
facility. According to vessel operators,
some facilities prohibit simultaneous
discharge of MARPOL residues and
cargo transfers thereby causing delays.
2. Provide a final report in items
listed above, a recommended way-ahead
to implement any recommendations
(e.g., proposed changes to MARPOL
and/or domestic regulations) and the
corresponding implementing language.
(To be completed by the fall of 2009)
Seeking Public Comment: Possible
areas of concern for stakeholders may
include:
• Conflicts with other regulations;
• Disposal cost issues at ports/
terminals;
• Requirement for lab analysis of
Annex I or II wastes;
• Segregation of Annex V wastes; and
• Additional burden, if any, of
adopting standardized Advance Notice
Forms (ANF) and/or Waste Delivery
Receipt (WDR) forms adopted by the
International Maritime Organization.
Public comments that are received
will assist and complement CTAC’s
efforts. CTAC’s MARPOL Annex
working group is scheduled to meet in
February 2009. Comments must be
received by January 31, 2009 in order to
be considered.
ADDRESSES: The public may address
comments via USPS, e-mail or FAX, to
Mr. James Prazak, CTAC Chairman,
C/O The Dow Chemical Company, 2301
N. Brazosport Blvd., B–122, Freeport,
TX 77541–3257. FAX (979) 238–9737,
E-mail: jprazak@dow.com. The Coast
Guard requests that copies of comments
be sent HQ, U.S. Coast Guard, CG–5442,
ATTN: Commander Michael Roldan,
2100 Second Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20593–0001. Fax: 202–372–1906, Email: luis.m.roldan@uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Commander Michael Roldan, telephone
202–372–1130, e-mail:
luis.m.roldan@uscg.mil, or David
Condino, MARPOL COA Project
Manager, telephone 202–372–1145, email: david.a.condino@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice
seeking public comment is given under
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5
U.S.C. App. (Pub. L. 92–463).
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Public Meeting: A separate Notice will
be given regarding the next CTAC
meeting at which time the Coast Guard
will seek to discuss such public
comments and the recommendations of
CTAC. This will be a public meeting
and instructions will be provided for
those wishing to make oral
presentations at the meeting and/or
wishing to provide written comments.
Dated: December 19, 2008.
J. Lantz,
Director of Commercial Regulations and
Standards.
[FR Doc. E8–30805 Filed 12–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
[USCG–2004–19621]
Dry Cargo Residue Discharges in the
Great Lakes; Preparation of
Environmental Impact Statement
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of intent; request for
comments; notice of public scoping
meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces
its intent to prepare a new
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the next phase of this rulemaking.
The new EIS will tier off the first EIS,
which was prepared in support of the
interim rule published in September
2008. Under the interim rule, the
discharge of bulk dry cargo residue is
allowed to continue in limited areas of
the Great Lakes and under certain
conditions. The Coast Guard plans to
issue a final rule that may modify the
interim rule and add new conditions for
discharges. The new EIS will support
the final rule. This notice requests
public comments and begins a public
scoping process to help determine the
scope of issues to be addressed in the
new EIS.
DATES: Comments and related material
must either be submitted to our online
docket via https://www.regulations.gov
on or before March 30, 2009 or reach the
Docket Management Facility by that
date. The public scoping meeting will
be held on January 28, 2009, from 1 p.m.
to 5 p.m. Comments and related
material must reach the Docket
Management Facility on or before March
30, 2009.
ADDRESSES: The public scoping meeting
will be held at the Hotel Blake, 500
South Dearborn, Chicago, IL 60605. The
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 249 / Monday, December 29, 2008 / Notices
contact telephone number for the Hotel
Blake is (312) 986–1234.
In addition to submitting written
statements or making verbal comments
at the public scoping meeting, you may
submit comments identified by docket
number USCG–2004–19621 using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these methods. For instructions
on submitting comments, see the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions regarding this
notice, please contact Mr. Greg
Kirkbride, U.S. Coast Guard, telephone
202–372–1479, e-mail Gregory.B.
Kirkbride@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Ms. Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to submit
comments and related material during
the public scoping process. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting comments: If you submit a
comment, please include the docket
number for this notice (USCG–2004–
19621) and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online, or by fax, mail or hand
delivery, but please use only one of
these means.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, select the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, insert ‘‘USCG–
2004–19621’’ in the Docket ID box,
press Enter, and then click on the
balloon shape in the Actions column. If
you submit your comments by mail or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:19 Dec 24, 2008
Jkt 217001
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period.
Viewing the comments: To view the
comments go to https://
www.regulations.gov, select the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, insert USCG–
2004–19621 in the Docket ID box, press
Enter, and then click on the item in the
Docket ID column. If you do not have
access to the internet, you may view the
docket online by visiting the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act: Anyone can search the
electronic form of comments received
into any of our dockets by the name of
the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted
on behalf of an association, business,
labor union, etc.). You may review a
Privacy Act, system of records notice
regarding our public dockets in the
January 17, 2008 issue of the Federal
Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Scoping Meeting
If you need special arrangements,
please use the contact information in
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The
meeting will start with an overview
presentation, followed by a formal
public comment period. Following the
formal public comment period, we will
hold an informal open house. At the
open house, Coast Guard personnel will
be available to provide more
information about the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Coast
Guard rulemaking processes, and dry
cargo residue discharges. A court
reporter will be present during both the
formal public comment period and the
informal open house to record verbal
comments from the public. The public
will also be able to submit written
comments related to this rulemaking at
any time during the meeting. Verbal
comments will be recorded and
transcribed, and the transcription will
be placed in the public docket along
with any written statements that may be
submitted during the meeting. These
comments and statements will be
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
79497
addressed by the Coast Guard as part of
the tiered Environmental Impact
Statement.
Background and Purpose
Bulk dry cargo vessels on the Great
Lakes sometimes wash the residue of
non-hazardous and non-toxic cargo, like
taconite (iron ore) pellets, coal, and
grain, overboard. This ‘‘sweeping,’’ or
discharge, of dry cargo residue (DCR) is
allowed, under certain conditions, by 33
CFR 151.66, as amended by an interim
rule published on September 29, 2008
(73 FR 56492), which was supported by
an EIS (the ‘‘first EIS’’).
The interim rule also announced the
Coast Guard’s intent to conduct a
second phase of this rulemaking before
issuing a final rule. In the second phase,
we want to determine what additional
regulatory changes, if any, should be
imposed on DCR discharges to offset
any potential long term impacts from
this practice. Those additional changes
could include, among other possible
measures, the mandatory use of DCR
control measures or adjustment to the
geographical boundaries within which
discharges are currently allowed. A
tiered EIS (40 CFR 1508.28; hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘second EIS’’) will
allow the Coast Guard to focus on these
specific issues, while excluding those
that were decided in the first phase of
the rulemaking, in order to determine
whether further adjustments to the
interim rule are needed.
As required by 40 CFR 1501.7, a
Council on Environmental Quality
regulation that implements NEPA, this
notice begins an early and open public
‘‘scoping process’’ for determining the
scope of issues to be addressed in the
second EIS. We invite public comment
on our current plan for preparing the
second EIS. Currently, we intend to:
• Conduct an inventory of shoreside
facilities for types of control measures
used when loading and unloading dry
cargo to and from vessels and types of
dry cargo handled.
• Conduct an inventory of vessels
that carry DCR for types of control
measures used on board the vessel when
loading and unloading.
• Quantify the current amount of
cargo residues on vessels, with and
without control measures.
• Review and analyze vessel DCR
reporting forms in order to quantify DCR
discharge amounts by cargo type, vessel
class, and control measure.
• Evaluate costs for implementing,
operating, and maintaining vessel and
shoreside DCR control measures.
• Update previous impact analyses of
DCR discharge on water quality changes
and DCR disposition.
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
79498
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 249 / Monday, December 29, 2008 / Notices
We may modify this plan in light of
public comment received during the
scoping process. This information will
be used as a basis for selecting the
proposed action from alternatives under
consideration. Analysis of this
information may also be used to develop
additional alternatives not listed below
that can be considered.
Possible Alternatives
Alternatives currently being
considered for future Coast Guard action
include:
• Adopting the interim rule as a final
rule without changes. This will allow
the current level of DCR discharges to
continue in limited areas of the Great
Lakes and under certain conditions. For
the purposes of our environmental
review in this second EIS, this
represents the ‘‘no-action’’ alternative;
• Adopting a final rule based on the
interim rule, but with changes designed
to reduce the potential environmental
impact of DCR discharges. Possible
changes would be specified and could
include:
Æ Adoption of the mandatory use of
DCR control measures;
• Control measures on vessels, and/or
• Control measures at the loading and
unloading facilities;
Æ DCR quantity discharge limits;
• DCR quantity limits could be scaled
according to vessel class, size and/or
route length;
Æ Cargo type discharge limits; or
Æ Additional restrictions on DCR
discharge locations;
• Prohibit all DCR discharges in the
Western Basin
• Zero-Discharge Alternative.
This is not an exhaustive list of
alternatives. We intend to be guided by
data on DCR discharges and DCR
control measures and by consideration
of all public comments.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Scoping Process
Public scoping is an early and open
process for determining the scope of
issues to be addressed in this second
EIS and for identifying the issues related
to the proposed action that may have a
significant effect on the Great Lakes
environment. The scoping process
begins with publication of this notice
and ends after the Coast Guard has:
• Invited the participation of Federal,
State, and local agencies, any affected
Indian tribe, and other interested
persons;
Æ The Coast Guard has requested the
Environmental Protection Agency, the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service,
the National Marine Fisheries Service,
the National Park Service, and the
United States Army Corps of Engineers
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:19 Dec 24, 2008
Jkt 217001
to serve as cooperating agencies in the
preparation of this second EIS. With this
Notice of Intent, we are asking Federal,
State, and local agencies with
jurisdiction or special expertise with
respect to environmental issues in the
Great Lakes region, in addition to those
we have already contacted, to formally
cooperate with us in the preparation of
this tiered EIS.
• Determined the scope and the
issues to be analyzed in depth in the
second EIS;
Æ From our first EIS, we have
identified this preliminary list of
environmental resources to receive
attention in the second EIS:
• Sediment physical structure
• Protected and Sensitive Areas
• Benthic Community
• Invasive Species
• Socioeconomic Resources
• Identified and eliminated from
detailed study those issues that are not
significant or that have been covered
elsewhere (for example, we do not
anticipate detailed study of the
following environmental resources that
we determined, in the first EIS, to have
‘‘no impact’’ from DCR discharges: fish
and other pelagic organisms, waterfowl,
and recreational or commercial fishing);
• Allocated responsibility for
preparing the tiered EIS components;
• Indicated any related
environmental assessments or
environmental impact statements that
are not part of the tiered EIS;
• Identified other relevant
environmental review and consultation
requirements, such as Coastal Zone
Management Act consistency
determinations, and threatened and
endangered species and habitat impacts;
• Indicated the relationship between
timing of the environmental review and
other aspects of the application process;
and
• Exercised our option under 40 CFR
1501.7(b) to hold the public scoping
meeting announced in this notice.
Once the scoping process is complete,
the Coast Guard will prepare a draft
second EIS, and we will publish a
Federal Register notice announcing its
public availability. If you wish to be
mailed or e-mailed the announcement of
the second EIS’s notice of availability,
please contact the person named in FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or send a
request to be added to our contact
mailing list along with your name and
mailing address or an e-mail address
online, by fax, mail, or hand delivery
according to the Submitting Comments
instructions above. If you provide
comments on this notice, we will
automatically add your contact
information to our contact mailing list
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and you will automatically be sent an
announcement of the draft second EIS’s
notice of availability. We will provide
the public with an opportunity to
review and comment on the draft
second EIS. After the Coast Guard
considers those comments, we will
prepare the final second EIS and
similarly announce its availability and
solicit public review and comment.
Dated: December 19, 2008.
Jeffery G. Lantz,
Director of Commercial Regulations and
Standards, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. E8–30804 Filed 12–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
Extension of Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review:
Aircraft Operator Security
AGENCY: Transportation Security
Administration, DHS.
ACTION: 30-day Notice.
SUMMARY: This notice announces that
the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) has forwarded the
Information Collection Request (ICR),
OMB control number 1652–0003,
abstracted below to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval of an extension of
the currently approved collection under
the Paperwork Reduction Act. The ICR
describes the nature of the information
collection and its expected burden. TSA
published a Federal Register notice,
with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments, of the following collection of
information on October 10, 2008, 73 FR
60310. TSA has implemented aircraft
operator security standards at 49 CFR
part 1544, which require each aircraft
operator to which this part applies to
adopt and implement a security
program.
DATES: Send your comments by January
28, 2009. A comment to OMB is most
effective if OMB receives it within 30
days of publication.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget. Comments should be addressed
to Desk Officer, Department of
Homeland Security/TSA, and sent via
electronic mail to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or faxed
to (202) 395–6974.
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 249 (Monday, December 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79496-79498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-30804]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
[USCG-2004-19621]
Dry Cargo Residue Discharges in the Great Lakes; Preparation of
Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of intent; request for comments; notice of public
scoping meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces its intent to prepare a new
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the next phase of this
rulemaking. The new EIS will tier off the first EIS, which was prepared
in support of the interim rule published in September 2008. Under the
interim rule, the discharge of bulk dry cargo residue is allowed to
continue in limited areas of the Great Lakes and under certain
conditions. The Coast Guard plans to issue a final rule that may modify
the interim rule and add new conditions for discharges. The new EIS
will support the final rule. This notice requests public comments and
begins a public scoping process to help determine the scope of issues
to be addressed in the new EIS.
DATES: Comments and related material must either be submitted to our
online docket via https://www.regulations.gov on or before March 30,
2009 or reach the Docket Management Facility by that date. The public
scoping meeting will be held on January 28, 2009, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
Comments and related material must reach the Docket Management Facility
on or before March 30, 2009.
ADDRESSES: The public scoping meeting will be held at the Hotel Blake,
500 South Dearborn, Chicago, IL 60605. The
[[Page 79497]]
contact telephone number for the Hotel Blake is (312) 986-1234.
In addition to submitting written statements or making verbal
comments at the public scoping meeting, you may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG-2004-19621 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these methods. For
instructions on submitting comments, see the ``Public Participation and
Request for Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions regarding this
notice, please contact Mr. Greg Kirkbride, U.S. Coast Guard, telephone
202-372-1479, e-mail Gregory.B. Kirkbride@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Ms.
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to submit comments and related material during the
public scoping process. All comments received will be posted, without
change, to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any personal
information you have provided.
Submitting comments: If you submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this notice (USCG-2004-19621) and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and
material online, or by fax, mail or hand delivery, but please use only
one of these means.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
select the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the
screen, insert ``USCG-2004-19621'' in the Docket ID box, press Enter,
and then click on the balloon shape in the Actions column. If you
submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period.
Viewing the comments: To view the comments go to https://
www.regulations.gov, select the Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, insert USCG-2004-19621 in the Docket ID box,
press Enter, and then click on the item in the Docket ID column. If you
do not have access to the internet, you may view the docket online by
visiting the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an agreement
with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket Management
Facility.
Privacy Act: Anyone can search the electronic form of comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review a
Privacy Act, system of records notice regarding our public dockets in
the January 17, 2008 issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Scoping Meeting
If you need special arrangements, please use the contact
information in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The meeting will start
with an overview presentation, followed by a formal public comment
period. Following the formal public comment period, we will hold an
informal open house. At the open house, Coast Guard personnel will be
available to provide more information about the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA), Coast Guard rulemaking processes, and dry cargo
residue discharges. A court reporter will be present during both the
formal public comment period and the informal open house to record
verbal comments from the public. The public will also be able to submit
written comments related to this rulemaking at any time during the
meeting. Verbal comments will be recorded and transcribed, and the
transcription will be placed in the public docket along with any
written statements that may be submitted during the meeting. These
comments and statements will be addressed by the Coast Guard as part of
the tiered Environmental Impact Statement.
Background and Purpose
Bulk dry cargo vessels on the Great Lakes sometimes wash the
residue of non-hazardous and non-toxic cargo, like taconite (iron ore)
pellets, coal, and grain, overboard. This ``sweeping,'' or discharge,
of dry cargo residue (DCR) is allowed, under certain conditions, by 33
CFR 151.66, as amended by an interim rule published on September 29,
2008 (73 FR 56492), which was supported by an EIS (the ``first EIS'').
The interim rule also announced the Coast Guard's intent to conduct
a second phase of this rulemaking before issuing a final rule. In the
second phase, we want to determine what additional regulatory changes,
if any, should be imposed on DCR discharges to offset any potential
long term impacts from this practice. Those additional changes could
include, among other possible measures, the mandatory use of DCR
control measures or adjustment to the geographical boundaries within
which discharges are currently allowed. A tiered EIS (40 CFR 1508.28;
hereinafter referred to as the ``second EIS'') will allow the Coast
Guard to focus on these specific issues, while excluding those that
were decided in the first phase of the rulemaking, in order to
determine whether further adjustments to the interim rule are needed.
As required by 40 CFR 1501.7, a Council on Environmental Quality
regulation that implements NEPA, this notice begins an early and open
public ``scoping process'' for determining the scope of issues to be
addressed in the second EIS. We invite public comment on our current
plan for preparing the second EIS. Currently, we intend to:
Conduct an inventory of shoreside facilities for types of
control measures used when loading and unloading dry cargo to and from
vessels and types of dry cargo handled.
Conduct an inventory of vessels that carry DCR for types
of control measures used on board the vessel when loading and
unloading.
Quantify the current amount of cargo residues on vessels,
with and without control measures.
Review and analyze vessel DCR reporting forms in order to
quantify DCR discharge amounts by cargo type, vessel class, and control
measure.
Evaluate costs for implementing, operating, and
maintaining vessel and shoreside DCR control measures.
Update previous impact analyses of DCR discharge on water
quality changes and DCR disposition.
[[Page 79498]]
We may modify this plan in light of public comment received during
the scoping process. This information will be used as a basis for
selecting the proposed action from alternatives under consideration.
Analysis of this information may also be used to develop additional
alternatives not listed below that can be considered.
Possible Alternatives
Alternatives currently being considered for future Coast Guard
action include:
Adopting the interim rule as a final rule without changes.
This will allow the current level of DCR discharges to continue in
limited areas of the Great Lakes and under certain conditions. For the
purposes of our environmental review in this second EIS, this
represents the ``no-action'' alternative;
Adopting a final rule based on the interim rule, but with
changes designed to reduce the potential environmental impact of DCR
discharges. Possible changes would be specified and could include:
[cir] Adoption of the mandatory use of DCR control measures;
Control measures on vessels, and/or
Control measures at the loading and unloading facilities;
[cir] DCR quantity discharge limits;
DCR quantity limits could be scaled according to vessel
class, size and/or route length;
[cir] Cargo type discharge limits; or
[cir] Additional restrictions on DCR discharge locations;
Prohibit all DCR discharges in the Western Basin
Zero-Discharge Alternative.
This is not an exhaustive list of alternatives. We intend to be
guided by data on DCR discharges and DCR control measures and by
consideration of all public comments.
Scoping Process
Public scoping is an early and open process for determining the
scope of issues to be addressed in this second EIS and for identifying
the issues related to the proposed action that may have a significant
effect on the Great Lakes environment. The scoping process begins with
publication of this notice and ends after the Coast Guard has:
Invited the participation of Federal, State, and local
agencies, any affected Indian tribe, and other interested persons;
[cir] The Coast Guard has requested the Environmental Protection
Agency, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the National
Marine Fisheries Service, the National Park Service, and the United
States Army Corps of Engineers to serve as cooperating agencies in the
preparation of this second EIS. With this Notice of Intent, we are
asking Federal, State, and local agencies with jurisdiction or special
expertise with respect to environmental issues in the Great Lakes
region, in addition to those we have already contacted, to formally
cooperate with us in the preparation of this tiered EIS.
Determined the scope and the issues to be analyzed in
depth in the second EIS;
[cir] From our first EIS, we have identified this preliminary list
of environmental resources to receive attention in the second EIS:
Sediment physical structure
Protected and Sensitive Areas
Benthic Community
Invasive Species
Socioeconomic Resources
Identified and eliminated from detailed study those issues
that are not significant or that have been covered elsewhere (for
example, we do not anticipate detailed study of the following
environmental resources that we determined, in the first EIS, to have
``no impact'' from DCR discharges: fish and other pelagic organisms,
waterfowl, and recreational or commercial fishing);
Allocated responsibility for preparing the tiered EIS
components;
Indicated any related environmental assessments or
environmental impact statements that are not part of the tiered EIS;
Identified other relevant environmental review and
consultation requirements, such as Coastal Zone Management Act
consistency determinations, and threatened and endangered species and
habitat impacts;
Indicated the relationship between timing of the
environmental review and other aspects of the application process; and
Exercised our option under 40 CFR 1501.7(b) to hold the
public scoping meeting announced in this notice.
Once the scoping process is complete, the Coast Guard will prepare
a draft second EIS, and we will publish a Federal Register notice
announcing its public availability. If you wish to be mailed or e-
mailed the announcement of the second EIS's notice of availability,
please contact the person named in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or
send a request to be added to our contact mailing list along with your
name and mailing address or an e-mail address online, by fax, mail, or
hand delivery according to the Submitting Comments instructions above.
If you provide comments on this notice, we will automatically add your
contact information to our contact mailing list and you will
automatically be sent an announcement of the draft second EIS's notice
of availability. We will provide the public with an opportunity to
review and comment on the draft second EIS. After the Coast Guard
considers those comments, we will prepare the final second EIS and
similarly announce its availability and solicit public review and
comment.
Dated: December 19, 2008.
Jeffery G. Lantz,
Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. E8-30804 Filed 12-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P