Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005: Fee for Self-Certification for Regulated Sellers of Scheduled Listed Chemical Products, 79318-79324 [E8-30800]
Download as PDF
79318
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 249 / Monday, December 29, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Shippers did not provide sufficient
justification for the Commission to
further modify the requirements of
FERC Form Nos. 6 and 6–Q.
9. The Commission recognizes that
FERC Form No. 6 contains only enough
information for a threshold
determination of whether the existing
rates are just and reasonable. However,
the Commission concludes that FERC
Form Nos. 6 and 6–Q continue to
provide sufficient information to allow
shippers to file a complaint requesting
a determination of the justness and
reasonableness of a pipeline’s rates.
Accordingly, the Commission concludes
that no changes to FERC Form Nos. 6
and 6–Q are warranted at this time, and
the Commission terminates Docket No.
RM07–9–000.
The Commission Orders
Docket No. RM07–9–000 is hereby
terminated, as discussed in the body of
this order.
By the Commission.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–30621 Filed 12–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0039]
21 CFR Part 524
Ophthalmic and Topical Dosage Form
New Animal Drugs; Triamcinolone
Cream
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is amending the
animal drug regulations to reflect
approval of an abbreviated new animal
drug application (ANADA) filed by
Modern Veterinary Therapeutics, LLC.
The ANADA provides for veterinary
prescription use of triamcinolone cream
on dogs for topical treatment of allergic
dermatitis and summer eczema.
DATES: This rule is effective December
29, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
K. Harshman, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV–104), Food and Drug
Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276–8197, email: john.harshman@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Modern
Veterinary Therapeutics, LLC, 1550
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:28 Dec 24, 2008
Jkt 217001
Madruga Ave., suite 329, Coral Gables,
FL 33146, filed ANADA 200–459 that
provides for veterinary prescription use
of VETAZINE (triamcinolone acetonide)
Cream on dogs for topical treatment of
allergic dermatitis and summer eczema.
Modern Veterinary Therapeutics, LLC’s
VETAZINE Cream is approved as a
generic copy of VETALOG Cream,
sponsored by Fort Dodge Animal
Health, A Division of Wyeth Holdings
Corp., under NADA 46–146. The
ANADA is approved as of November 13,
2008, and the regulations are amended
in § 524.2481 to reflect the approval.
In accordance with the freedom of
information provisions of 21 CFR part
20 and 21 CFR 514.11(e)(2)(ii), a
summary of safety and effectiveness
data and information submitted to
support approval of this application
may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852, between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
The agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.33(a)(1) that this action is of a
type that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
This rule does not meet the definition
of ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because
it is a rule of ‘‘particular applicability.’’
Therefore, it is not subject to the
congressional review requirements in 5
U.S.C. 801–808.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 522
Animal drugs.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs and redelegated to
the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21
CFR part 524 is amended as follows:
■
PART 524—OPHTHALMIC AND
TOPICAL DOSAGE FORM NEW
ANIMAL DRUGS
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 524 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.
2. In § 524.2481, revise paragraphs (b),
(c)(2), and (c)(3) to read as follows:
■
§ 524.2481
Triamcinolone cream.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Sponsor. See Nos. 015914, 053501,
and 054925 in § 510.600(c) of this
chapter.
(c) * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(2) Indications for use. For topical
treatment of allergic dermatitis and
summer eczema.
(3) Limitations. Federal law restricts
this drug to use by or on the order of
a licensed veterinarian.
Dated: December 18, 2008.
William T. Flynn,
Acting Director, Center for Veterinary
Medicine.
[FR Doc. E8–30694 Filed 12–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1314
[Docket No. DEA–298F]
RIN 1117–AB13
Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic
Act of 2005: Fee for Self-Certification
for Regulated Sellers of Scheduled
Listed Chemical Products
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), Department of
Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: To comply with the
requirement of the Controlled
Substances Act that fees be set at a level
to ensure the recovery of the full costs
of operating the various aspects of the
Diversion Control Program, this Final
Rule establishes an annual selfcertification fee for certain ‘‘regulated
sellers,’’ that is, persons and entities
selling scheduled listed chemical
products at retail locations who are
required to self-certify with DEA
relative to compliance with certain
requirements of the Combat
Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of
2005 (CMEA). This Final Rule
establishes the annual self-certification
fee for regulated sellers who are not
DEA pharmacy registrants.
DATES: Effective Date: February 1, 2009.
The new fee will be in effect for all new
applications electronically sent on or
after the effective date and for all
renewal applications electronically sent
on or after the effective date.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark W. Caverly, Chief, Liaison and
Policy Section, Office of Diversion
Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, 8701 Morrissette Drive,
Springfield, VA 22152; Telephone (202)
307–7297.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\29DER1.SGM
29DER1
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 249 / Monday, December 29, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
I. Background and Statutory Authority
The Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) implements the
Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention
and Control Act of 1970, often referred
to as the Controlled Substances Act
(CSA) and the Controlled Substances
Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 801–
971), as amended. DEA publishes the
implementing regulations for these
statutes in Title 21 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), Parts 1300 to
1399. These regulations are designed to
ensure that there is a sufficient supply
of controlled substances for legitimate
medical, scientific, research, and
industrial purposes and to deter the
diversion of controlled substances to
illegal purposes. The CSA mandates that
DEA establish a closed system of control
for manufacturing, distributing, and
dispensing controlled substances. Any
person who manufactures, distributes,
dispenses, imports, exports, or conducts
research or chemical analysis with
controlled substances must register with
DEA (unless exempt) and comply with
the applicable requirements for the
activity. The CSA as amended also
requires DEA to regulate the
manufacture and distribution of
chemicals that may be used to
manufacture controlled substances
illegally. Listed chemicals that are
classified as List I chemicals are
important to the manufacture of
controlled substances. Those classified
as List II chemicals may be used to
manufacture controlled substances.
On March 9, 2006, the President
signed the Combat Methamphetamine
Epidemic Act of 2005 (CMEA), which is
Title VII of the USA PATRIOT
Improvement and Reauthorization Act
of 2005 (Pub. L. 109–177). The CMEA
amends the CSA to change the
regulations for selling nonprescription
products that contain ephedrine,
pseudoephedrine,
phenylpropanolamine, their salts,
optical isomers, and salts of optical
isomers. DEA implemented the retail
provisions of CMEA through an Interim
Final Rule entitled ‘‘Retail Sales of
Scheduled Listed Chemical Products;
Self-Certification of Regulated Sellers of
Scheduled Listed Chemical Products’’
published in the Federal Register
September 26, 2006 (71 FR 56008;
corrected at 71 FR 60609, October 13,
2006). In that Interim Final Rule, DEA
extensively discussed its intent to issue
a rulemaking to establish the
certification fee for regulated sellers of
scheduled listed chemical products and
the methodology for calculating fees
(see specifically 71 FR 56013–56015,
September 26, 2006; corrected at 71 FR
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:28 Dec 24, 2008
Jkt 217001
60609, October 13, 2006). To this end,
DEA published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking proposing self-certification
fees for regulated sellers selling
scheduled listed chemical products at
retail on October 1, 2007 (72 FR 55712).
This rulemaking finalizes that Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking.
Section 886a of the CSA defines the
Diversion Control Program as ‘‘the
controlled substance and chemical
diversion control activities of the Drug
Enforcement Administration,’’ which
are further defined as the ‘‘activities
related to the registration and control of
the manufacture, distribution and
dispensing, importation and exportation
of controlled substances and listed
chemicals.’’ The CSA also states that
reimbursements from the Diversion
Control Fee Account ‘‘ * * * shall be
made without distinguishing between
expenses related to controlled
substances activities and expenses
related to chemical activities.’’ [Pub. L.
108–447 Consolidated Appropriations
Act of 2005]
In addition, Section 111(b)(3) of the
Departments of Commerce, Justice, and
State, the Judiciary, and Related
Agencies Appropriations Act of 1993
(Pub. L. 102–395), codified at 21 U.S.C.
886a(3), requires that ‘‘fees charged by
the Drug Enforcement Administration
under its diversion control program
shall be set at a level that ensures the
recovery of the full costs of operating
the various aspects of that program.’’
CMEA implements new requirements
governing the sale of scheduled listed
chemical products, defined as
nonprescription drug products
containing ephedrine, pseudoephedrine,
or phenylpropanolamine. As part of
these requirements, CMEA requires
certification for all regulated sellers of
scheduled listed chemical products,
defining regulated seller to mean a retail
distributor (including a pharmacy and
mobile retail vendors). The CMEA
requires that on and after September 30,
2006, a regulated seller or any of its
employees must not sell scheduled
listed chemical products unless it has
certified to DEA, through DEA’s Web
site. The certification requires the
regulated seller to confirm the
following:
• Its employees who will be engaged
in the sale of scheduled listed chemical
products have undergone training
regarding provisions of CMEA.
• Records of the training are
maintained.
• Without regard to the number of
transactions, a regulated seller may not
in a single calendar day sell any
purchaser more than 3.6 grams of
ephedrine base, 3.6 grams of
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
79319
pseudoephedrine base, or 3.6 grams of
phenylpropanolamine base in
scheduled listed chemical products. (A
mobile retail vendor may not in any 30day period sell an individual purchaser
more than 7.5 grams ephedrine base, 7.5
grams pseudoephedrine base, or 7.5
grams phenylpropanolamine base.)
• Nonliquid forms are packaged as
required.
• Scheduled listed chemical products
are stored behind the counter or in a
locked cabinet.
• A written or electronic logbook
containing the required information on
sales of scheduled listed chemical
products is maintained.
• The logbook information will be
disclosed only to Federal, State, or local
law enforcement and only to ensure
compliance with Title 21 of the United
States Code or to facilitate a product
recall.
The regulated seller must train its
employees and certify before either the
seller or individual employees may sell
scheduled listed chemical products. The
certification is subject to the provisions
of 18 U.S.C. 1001. A regulated seller
who knowingly or willfully certifies to
facts that are not true is subject to fines
and imprisonment.
The CMEA also exempts retail
distributors from registration
requirements under the CSA; however,
in practice, retail distributors have not
previously registered with DEA because
they limited their sales to below
threshold quantities and to products
sold in blister packs.
On October 1, 2007, DEA published a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
outlining the calculations for the
proposed fee and compliance
requirements for the self-certification
fee (72 FR 55712).
II. Comments Received
Following publication of the October
1, 2007, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
DEA received seven comments.
Comments generally supported DEA’s
proposed certification fee approach and
methodology and DEA’s exemption of
regulated sellers of scheduled listed
chemical products who already
maintain an active DEA registration as
a pharmacy to dispense controlled
substances. Five of the comments were
from pharmaceutical associations; one
comment was from a large chain
pharmacy, and one comment was from
an individual.
Fee and fee structure: Commenters
generally supported DEA’s proposed fee
of $16 to self-certify and supported
DEA’s calculation of this fee based on
the overall program costs. One
commenter noted that this methodology
E:\FR\FM\29DER1.SGM
29DER1
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
79320
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 249 / Monday, December 29, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
distributes the program costs to all
sellers. Several commenters noted that
the fee did not represent a burdensome
amount. DEA agrees that the $16
proposed fee, finalized at $21, will not
constitute a financial burden on
regulated sellers and adds that
businesses for which the selfcertification fee would have been a
barrier have stopped carrying the
products due to other compliance costs
associated with CMEA. Several
commenters specifically noted their
opposition to calculating the selfcertification fee based on business size
or overall volume of sales. Commenters
questioned whether DEA had the
statutory authority to collect such
information, and noted that such
collection would be administratively
intensive, thereby further increasing
fees charged. DEA also notes that it does
not have the statutory authority or
resources to be investigating these
business details of regulated sellers. One
commenter, who noted that it did not
believe that DEA has this statutory
authority to collect such information,
also added that even if DEA had the
statutory authority to collect the type of
information necessary to enable this
type of fee structure, it believed that the
administrative burden of collecting this
information would force an increase in
self-certification fees to cover such
administrative costs. The commenter
therefore opposed this methodology on
both grounds.
Fee exemption for registrants
registered to dispense controlled
substances: All seven commenters
supported the fee exemption for
regulated sellers who already maintain
an annual registration to dispense
controlled substances, i.e., a pharmacy
registration. In the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, DEA described the fee
exemption for this group of registrants
who already pay an annual fee or
annual fee equivalent to support the
operations of the Diversion Control
Program.
Harmonization of registration and
self-certification: Related to these
comments, five commenters requested
that DEA harmonize the selfcertification and annual registration/
reregistration process. Currently the
majority of DEA registrants—
practitioners (which includes
pharmacies)—renew their registration
with DEA every three years and pay a
three-year fee to support the operations
of the Diversion Control Program. DEA
periodically recalculates the fee
schedule for all registrants to ensure
compliance with the statutory
requirement that the full costs of
operating the various aspects of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:28 Dec 24, 2008
Jkt 217001
Diversion Control Program are
supported through registration fees.
Because self-certification occurs
annually and registration of
practitioners, including pharmacies,
occurs every three years, there is no way
to combine these two processes. That is,
because the time frames are not
concurrent, DEA cannot harmonize the
renewal of self-certification and
registration/reregistration for
pharmacies at this time. DEA has made
every effort to provide as much
harmonization as possible by permitting
those pharmacies who register with
DEA through the chain registration
process to also self-certify using that
process. Furthermore, when requested
by individual registrants, DEA has
endeavored to allow the selfcertification to expire in the same
month, but not necessarily the same
year, as the DEA registration.
DEA is considering whether to revise
the time period for registration of
practitioners (for example, requiring
registration on an annual basis). If DEA
pursues this course of action, it will
publish a separate rulemaking
requesting public comment on such a
change.
Reminder of self-certification
requirement: One commenter suggested
that DEA develop an annual outreach
program to remind regulated sellers of
their annual self-certification
requirement. Because self-certification
is a certification by the regulated seller
of compliance with the requirements of
CMEA, DEA believes that it is the
responsibility of the regulated seller to
obtain and maintain their selfcertification in good standing. Congress
indicated in CMEA that self-certification
is the responsibility of the regulated
seller and strictly limited DEA
involvement in the self-certification
process (21 U.S.C. 830(e)(1)(B)(iii)).
Signature of self-certification: In the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking DEA
noted that it had previously requested
comments regarding who should be
authorized to sign the self-certification
for the regulated seller, given that the
person must be in a position to confirm
all the self-certification requirements
listed above. Two commenters
responded to the request. Both
commenters suggested that the manager
of the regulated seller be authorized to
sign the self-certification for the
regulated seller. DEA appreciates these
responses and will address this specific
issue in a separate rulemaking, as this
Final Rule is intended only to address
the self-certification fee and not other
aspects of the self-certification process.
Waiver of self-certification fee for
distributors of List I chemicals: One
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
commenter requested that DEA consider
waiving the self-certification fee for
entities that own both distributors of
List I chemicals and retailers of
controlled substances (e.g., nonpharmacy retailers). DEA proposed the
waiver of the self-certification fee for
retail pharmacies who already maintain
a registration with DEA because the
retail sale of scheduled listed chemical
products is essentially the same activity
as dispensing (that is, sale at retail) of
controlled substances. Thus it makes
sense to exempt this category of
registered regulated sellers because the
activities are in fact similar. However,
the distribution of List I chemicals at the
non-retail level is not a similar activity
to retail dispensing or sales to
individual purchasers. DEA also notes
that self-certification is only required for
retail (not wholesale) distributors of
scheduled listed chemical products. If,
as the commenter claimed, there are
entities that distribute List I chemical
products and sell such products at the
retail level, then even prior to
enactment of CMEA such entities would
have been required to maintain two
separate registrations—one as a retail
distributor and one as a non-retail
distributor. Accordingly, the selfcertification fee is not waived for nonretail distributors of List I chemicals.
Enforcement costs: Finally, one
commenter observed that the
calculation of the self-certification fee in
the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking did
not include any enforcement costs,
adding that this omission was
‘‘astonishingly optimistic’’ and
suggesting that DEA include a small
amount of anticipated enforcement costs
to the overall fee calculation, and that
doing so ‘‘still would not make it
burdensome.’’ As DEA noted in the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the
self-certification fee included in this
Final Rule does not include DEA
activities associated with enforcement
and judicial proceedings. CMEA gives
DEA the authority to prohibit a
regulated seller from selling scheduled
listed chemical products for certain
violations of CMEA. Following such an
order, the affected regulated seller is
entitled to an administrative hearing (if
requested in a timely manner). While
the costs of these enforcement activities
and the subsequent proceedings must be
supported through fees pursuant to the
statutory requirements previously
described above, because DEA is
uncertain of the resources required and
the likely costs of these activities, these
costs are not reflected in the selfcertification fee contained in this Final
Rule. Once DEA is able to determine the
E:\FR\FM\29DER1.SGM
29DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 249 / Monday, December 29, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
frequency of use of these tools and their
associated costs, these costs will be
recovered through fees associated with
self-certification as established in future
rulemakings.
III. Self-Certification Fee
DEA considers the self-certification
requirements of the CMEA to fall within
the legal definition of controlled
substance and chemical diversion
control activities as governed by section
886a of the CSA (see above).
Accordingly, these activities fall under
the general operation of the Diversion
Control Program and are subject to the
requirements of the Appropriations Act
of 1993 that mandates that fees charged
shall be set at a level that ensures the
recovery of the full costs of operating
the various aspects of the Diversion
Control Program. The self-certification
requirements of CMEA fall under these
‘‘various aspects.’’ Therefore, by this
Final Rule DEA will charge a fee for
each self-certification to comply with
these statutory requirements and ensure
that the full costs of operating the
Diversion Control Program are covered
by fees as required by law.
The fee for certification will be
applied to all associated costs, including
the initial one-time costs of setting up
the certification program, Web site, and
programmatic infrastructure, as well as
ongoing costs associated with the
provision of certifications, call center
support, maintenance of the selfcertification system, printing costs for
certificates that regulated sellers cannot
print, financial management, and other
related costs. DEA has established a
program to train its employees to
provide information regarding, and
accept, certifications and must establish
the infrastructure necessary for the
program. Required systems include
creation of history, renewal cycles,
investigative tools, business validation
rules, and development and
maintenance of the self-certification
Web site.
As discussed previously, other DEA
activities associated with selfcertification and compliance with
CMEA include enforcement and judicial
proceedings. CMEA gives DEA the
authority to prohibit a regulated seller
from selling scheduled listed chemical
products for certain violations of CMEA.
If DEA issues an order to a regulated
seller prohibiting that regulated seller
from selling scheduled listed chemical
products, the regulated seller is entitled
to an administrative hearing if the seller
files a timely request for a hearing. The
costs of these enforcement activities and
the subsequent proceedings must be
supported through fees pursuant to the
above described statutory requirements.
However, these costs are not reflected in
the self-certification fees contained in
this rulemaking, as DEA is uncertain of
their utilization. Once DEA is able to
determine the frequency of use of these
tools and their associated costs, these
costs will be recovered through fees
associated with self-certification as
established in future rulemakings.
Regulated sellers submit a
certification online via the DEA selfcertification Web site and will pay a fee
by credit card at the time of each
certification. DEA calculated this fee
based on estimated set-up costs in Fiscal
Year 2006 ($93,369) and Fiscal Years
2007 and 2008 operating and
maintenance costs ($1,338,484 and
$808,643, respectively) totaling
$2,240,496, as shown in Table 1 below.
The initial systems development and
79321
set-up costs will not be repeated in
subsequent years. Thus, the total
amount to be recovered for Fiscal Years
2006 through 2008 is $2,240,496. Total
annual costs associated with operating
the certification process include staff
costs, operational and administrative
costs, Web hosting, monitoring and
maintenance costs (including hardware
and software maintenance), and annual
inflation adjustments.
To calculate the fee, DEA divided the
total costs for Fiscal Years 2006 through
2008 by the anticipated population of
affected regulated sellers of 55,000. As
of October 27, 2008, 53,989 retailers had
self-certified that they were in
compliance with the rule. In making the
final fee calculation, DEA doubled the
number of self-certified sellers from
55,000 to 110,000 to reflect one selfcertification and one renewal by each
person during Fiscal Years 2006–2008,
the time period for which fees were
calculated. DEA notes that it has
adjusted the population of regulated
sellers to accurately characterize the
current number of persons self-certified
with DEA. This adjustment has resulted
in a higher cost per self-certified
location than DEA proposed in the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. All
costs are shown in the table below for
Fiscal Years 2006 through 2008. The
self-certification costs reflect the cost
per each self-certification per each
facility as required by CMEA.
To minimize administrative and
collection burdens, it is DEA’s policy to
round all fees up to the nearest dollar
when calculating fees. This is done to
ensure that the full cost of the Diversion
Control Program is collected as
mandated by statute. Therefore, the fee
for self-certifications will be $21.00.
TABLE 1—SELF-CERTIFICATION COSTS AND FEE CALCULATION
2006 *
2007
Planning (1) .....................................................................................................
Design, Development, Deployment (2) ............................................................
Call Center, Finance, Mail Room, Printing (3) ................................................
Maintenance (4) ...............................................................................................
Enhancements (5) ...........................................................................................
$3,029
$43,512
$35,423
$11,405
........................
$36,343
$703,863
$425,075
$173,203
........................
$37,002
$71,662
$432,777
$176,341
$90,861
$76,373
$819,037
$893,275
$360,949
$90,861
Total ..........................................................................................................
$93,369
$1,338,484
$808,643
$2,240,496
Population ........................................................................................................
Cost per certification (= total cost/population) .................................................
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Project detail
2008
........................
........................
55,000
$26.04
55,000
$14.71
........................
$20.38
* 2006 is only one month of operations.
Planning *
Design, Development, Deployment.
Creation of self-certification system **
Operation support includes:
5 FTE, 3% of their time; 1 D/I 5% of their time.
10% allocation of effort, 2 months planning; 6 months development; 2 months testing, Q/A, CM, C&A, deployment.
Call center, finance, distribution and printing operations.
** Self-certification system includes creation of history, renewal cycles, investigative tools, business validation rules.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:28 Dec 24, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\29DER1.SGM
29DER1
Total cost
79322
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 249 / Monday, December 29, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2—CALCULATION OF FEE
No. estimated
to self-certify
Self-certification and one
renewal
$2,241,000 .......................................................................................................
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Cost for FY2006–2008
/(55,000
* 2)
All regulated sellers will pay the $21
fee upon annual self-certification to the
DEA with the exception of those
regulated sellers who already maintain
an active registration with DEA to
dispense controlled substances, i.e.,
pharmacy registrants. In making this
exception, as described in further detail
in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(72 FR 55712), DEA notes that many of
the regulated sellers affected by the selfcertification requirement already are
registered with DEA to dispense
controlled substances and therefore
already pay a registration/reregistration
fee to DEA. The CSA requires that all
manufacturers, importers, exporters,
distributors and dispensers (e.g.,
pharmacies) of controlled substances
and List I chemicals obtain an annual
registration with DEA. This process also
is under the administration of the
Diversion Control Program. For
example, pharmacies registered with
DEA to dispense controlled substances
pay a three-year registration fee of $551
(an annual equivalent of $184). This
annual (or three-year) registration fee
supports the operations of the Diversion
Control Program, including program
priorities and field management
oversight; coordination of major
investigations; drafting and
promulgating of regulations relating to
the enforcement of the CSA and other
legislation; advice and leadership on
state legislation/regulation; legal control
of drugs and chemicals not previously
under Federal control; control of
imports and exports of licit controlled
substances and chemicals; program
resource planning and allocation, and
investigation, inspection, and
cooperative efforts with other law
enforcement entities and the regulated
industries, among other activities.
While these existing registrants are
required by the CMEA to self-certify
with DEA if selling scheduled listed
chemical products, the self-certification
fee will be waived upon submission of
an active DEA pharmacy registration
number in good standing because these
registrants already pay an annual fee (or
annual fee equivalent) to support the
operations of the Diversion Control
Program.
DEA remains uncertain of the
anticipated costs associated with
enforcement activities related to self-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:28 Dec 24, 2008
Jkt 217001
certification. Investigative and other
activities designed to ascertain and
ensure compliance with CMEA will
require funding in excess of one-time
set-up and maintenance expenses. DEA
anticipates publishing a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking to revise the fee
for self-certification in the near future.
That rule will address costs related to
enforcement activities, as well as other
expenses related to self-certification of
regulated sellers of scheduled listed
chemical products. As with all fees
collected by DEA, fees collected beyond
Fiscal Year 2008, the projected end of
the three-year cycle discussed above,
will ensure recovery of the full costs of
the various aspects of the Diversion
Control Program as mandated by statute
(21 U.S.C. 886a). Those various aspects
of the Diversion Control Program could
include, among other things, costs of
enforcement activities associated with
self-certification.
Methodology Regarding Establishment
of Fee
CMEA specifically states that a
separate certification is required for
each separate location at which
scheduled listed chemical products are
sold. As such, mobile retail vendors
must certify for each location at which
sales transactions occur, e.g., a
fairground one week, a convention
center the next, etc. Similarly, large
corporate chains such as chain
pharmacies must certify for each
separate location at which scheduled
listed chemical products are sold. Each
location must self-certify for itself,
although DEA has established a process
for the self-certification of pharmacies
participating in DEA’s chain pharmacy
renewal program.
Additionally, CMEA mandates selfcertification for all regulated sellers
irrespective of the extent such entities
or persons handle scheduled listed
chemical products. Accordingly, DEA
may not alter the fee structure to
account for the extent to which selfcertifiers handle these products, for
example adjusting self-certification fees
according to sales volume or size of
establishment. DEA notes, as discussed
above, that all commenters supported
this position.
Finally, as referenced earlier in this
rulemaking, CMEA requires that all
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Fee for selfcertification
= $20.38
= $21.00
persons selling scheduled listed
chemical products at retail self-certify to
DEA, regardless of whether those
persons are already registered with DEA
to handle controlled substances or List
I chemicals.
In its Interim Final Rule establishing
self-certification and other requirements
(71 FR 56008, September 26, 2006;
corrected at 71 FR 60609, October 13,
2006), DEA established that certification
must be renewed annually. However, to
spread the population of self-certifiers
throughout the year (i.e., to prevent all
persons who are self-certified from
continuing to renew in the month of
September every year), DEA in its
Interim Final Rule indicated that it will
assign self-certifiers to one of 12 groups.
Each group will have an expiration date
that will be the last day of a month from
12 to 23 months after the initial filing.
The expiration date is contained in each
regulated seller’s self-certification
certificate. After the second
certification, regulated sellers will be
required to certify annually. Thus,
between September 30, 2006, and the
end of Fiscal Year 2008 on September
30, 2008, all self-certifiers will have
initially self-certified and renewed their
certification once, assuming they
continue to sell scheduled listed
chemical products at retail. Payment of
the self-certification fee will be
completed at the same time as selfcertification.
Regulatory Certifications
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Acting Administrator hereby
certifies that this rulemaking has been
drafted in accordance with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612), has reviewed this regulation,
and by approving it certifies that this
regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. As discussed
previously, DEA has adjusted the
population of regulated sellers to
accurately characterize the current
number of persons self-certified with
DEA. This adjustment has resulted in a
higher cost per self-certified location
($21) than DEA proposed in the Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking ($16).
The Final Rule will affect a
substantial number of small entities, but
E:\FR\FM\29DER1.SGM
29DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 249 / Monday, December 29, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
will not have a significant economic
impact. The fee is minimal—$21 a year.
The smallest firms potentially covered
are general merchandise stores (NAICS
45299) where the average sales of the
smallest firms are $60,000 a year
according to the 2002 Retail TradeSubject Series of the Economic Census.
The smallest firms in the other sectors
(NAICS 44511 (grocery stores), 44512
(convenience stores), 44611 (drug
stores), 44711 (gas stations with
convenience stores)), except for
discount department stores (NAICS
452112) and superstores (NAICS 45291),
have annual sales of between $120,000
and $150,000. There are no discount
department stores or superstores with
annual sales of less than $1 million and
$5 million, respectively. The annual fee,
therefore, would represent less than
0.05 percent of sales for the smallest
store and generally about 0.01 percent of
sales, which does not impose a
significant economic impact.
Executive Order 12866
The Acting Administrator further
certifies that this rulemaking has been
79323
drafted in accordance with the
principles in Executive Order 12866
section 1(b). It has been determined that
this is a significant regulatory action.
Therefore, this action has been reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget.
Regulated Sellers. As of October 27,
2008, 53,989 retailers had self-certified
with DEA. Table 3 presents the number
of retailers by sector and indicates
whether they have indicated that they
are DEA registrants.
TABLE 3—SECTORS SELLING SCHEDULED LISTED CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
Registrants
certified
NAICS
Nonregistrants
certified
44511 Grocery stores ..............................................................................................................................................
44611 Pharmacy and drug stores ...........................................................................................................................
452112 Discount Department Stores ......................................................................................................................
45291 Warehouse Clubs and Superstores .............................................................................................................
3,781
27,678
1,777
4,373
850
500
25
6
Subtotal .............................................................................................................................................................
37,609
1,381
44512 Convenience stores ......................................................................................................................................
44711 Gas Stations with convenience stores .........................................................................................................
45299 All other general merchandise stores ..........................................................................................................
Other ........................................................................................................................................................................
3
0
9
42
5,499
9,020
214
212
Total ...........................................................................................................................................................
37,663
16,326
Costs/Benefits. As discussed in the
previous sections, DEA has estimated
costs of $2,240,496 for Fiscal Years 2006
through 2008 for DEA to establish and
support the regulated seller selfcertification program, which CMEA
mandates. As required by law, this cost
will be recovered from regulated sellers
through a self-certification fee. As noted
in the previous section, the fee imposes
a minimal burden on regulated sellers.
CMEA requires self-certification as a
condition of selling these products. The
fee will allow DEA to operate a program
needed to permit regulated sellers to
continue offering scheduled listed
chemical products to their customers.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $120 million or more
(adjusted for inflation) in any one year,
and will not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions were deemed necessary under
the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Congressional Review Act
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable
standards set forth in Sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 Civil
Justice Reform.
Executive Order 13132
This rulemaking does not preempt or
modify any provision of state law; nor
does it impose enforcement
responsibilities on any state; nor does it
diminish the power of any state to
enforce its own laws. Accordingly, this
rulemaking does not have federalism
implications warranting the application
of Executive Order 13132.
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (Congressional Review
Act). This rule will not result in an
annual effect on the economy of
$100,000,000 or more; a major increase
in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1314
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:28 Dec 24, 2008
Jkt 217001
Drug traffic control, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
■ For the reasons set out above, 21 CFR
Part 1314 is amended as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 1314—RETAIL SALE OF
SCHEDULED LISTED CHEMICAL
PRODUCTS
1. The authority citation for Part 1314
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 802, 830, 842, 871(b),
875, 877, 886a.
2. Section 1314.42 is added to read as
follows:
■
§ 1314.42 Self-certification fee; time and
method of fee payment.
(a) A regulated seller must pay a fee
for each self-certification. For each
initial application to self-certify, and for
the renewal of each existing selfcertification, a regulated seller shall pay
a fee of $21.
(b) The fee for self-certification shall
be waived for any person holding a
current, DEA registration in good
standing as a pharmacy to dispense
controlled substances.
(c) A regulated seller shall pay the fee
at the time of self-certification.
(d) Payment shall be made by credit
card.
(e) The self-certification fee is not
refundable.
E:\FR\FM\29DER1.SGM
29DER1
79324
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 249 / Monday, December 29, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
December 18, 2008.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. E8–30800 Filed 12–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 180
Consolidated HUD Hearing Procedures
for Civil Rights Matters
CFR Correction
In title 24 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, parts 0 to 199, revised as of
April 1, 2008, on pages 733 and 734, in
§ 180.670, remove paragraphs
(b)(3)(iii)(A) through (b)(3)(iii)(C).
[FR Doc. E8–30942 Filed 12–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9442]
RIN 1545–BA11
§ 1.1502–13(g) (regarding the treatment
of transactions involving obligations
between members of a consolidated
group) and to add § 1.1502–
13(e)(2)(ii)(C) (regarding the treatment of
certain transactions involving the
provision of insurance between
members of a consolidated group). The
2007 Proposed Regulations replaced an
earlier proposal (REG–105964–98) [63
FR 70354], published in the Federal
Register on December 21, 1998, which
was withdrawn.
On February 25, 2008, the IRS and the
Treasury Department published a notice
(Announcement 2008–25) in the
Federal Register (73 FR 9972)
withdrawing the portion of the 2007
Proposed Regulations relating to the
treatment of intercompany insurance
transactions. No public hearing
regarding the remaining portion of the
2007 Proposed Regulations was
requested or held. However, written,
electronic, and oral comments were
received. After consideration of all of
the comments, the 2007 Proposed
Regulations are adopted as revised by
this Treasury decision. The principal
comments and changes are discussed in
this preamble.
Explanation of Provisions
Consolidated Returns; Intercompany
Obligations
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
SUMMARY: This document contains final
regulations under section 1502 of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code). The
regulations provide guidance regarding
the treatment of transactions involving
obligations between members of a
consolidated group. These final
regulations will affect affiliated groups
of corporations filing consolidated
returns.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective on December 24, 2008.
Applicability Date: For dates of
applicability, see §§ 1.1502–13(g)(8) and
1.1502–28(d).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frances Kelly, (202) 622–7770 (not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 28, 2007, the IRS and
the Treasury Department published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (REG–
107592–00) in the Federal Register (72
FR 55139) (the 2007 Proposed
Regulations) which proposed to amend
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:28 Dec 24, 2008
Jkt 217001
Former Regulations Under § 1.1502–
13(g) (the Former Regulations)
An intercompany obligation is
generally defined as an obligation
between members of a consolidated
group, but only for the period during
which both the creditor and debtor are
members of the group. The Former
Regulations under § 1.1502–13(g) (the
1995 regulations and the 1998 proposed
regulations, as in effect before these
final regulations), prescribe rules
relating to the treatment of transactions
involving such obligations, and apply
generally to three broad categories of
transactions; transactions in which an
obligation between a group member and
a nonmember becomes an intercompany
obligation (inbound transactions),
transactions in which an intercompany
obligation ceases to be an intercompany
obligation (outbound transactions), and
transactions in which an intercompany
obligation is assigned or extinguished
within the consolidated group
(intragroup transactions).
For all three types of transactions, the
intercompany obligation is treated as
satisfied and, if it remains outstanding,
reissued as a new obligation (the
deemed satisfaction-reissuance model).
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Significant Changes Made by the 2007
Proposed Regulations
The 2007 Proposed Regulations make
several significant changes to the
Former Regulations, principally with
respect to intragroup and outbound
transactions.
First, the 2007 Proposed Regulations
simplify the mechanics of the deemed
satisfaction-reissuance model by
separating the deemed transactions from
the actual transaction. In general, the
new model deems the following
sequence of events to occur immediately
before, and independently of, the actual
transaction: (i) the debtor is deemed to
satisfy the obligation for a cash amount
equal to the obligation’s fair market
value, and (ii) the debtor is deemed to
immediately reissue the obligation to
the original creditor for that same cash
amount. The parties are then treated as
engaging in the actual transaction but
with the new obligation.
Second, the 2007 Proposed
Regulations provide that for transactions
where it is appropriate to require a
deemed satisfaction and reissuance, the
intercompany obligation generally
should be deemed satisfied and reissued
for its fair market value (rather than
issue price determined under the
original issue discount principles of
sections 1273 and 1274).
Third, the 2007 Proposed Regulations
narrow the scope of intragroup and
outbound transactions that trigger the
deemed satisfaction-reissuance model
by providing a number of exceptions to
its application. A deemed satisfaction
and reissuance generally is not required
for these excepted transactions either
because it is not necessary to apply the
deemed satisfaction-reissuance model to
carry out the purposes of § 1.1502–13(g)
or because the burdens associated with
valuing the obligation or applying the
mechanics of the deemed satisfactionreissuance model outweigh the benefits
achieved by its application.
Finally, the 2007 Proposed
Regulations include two anti-abuse
rules, the ‘‘material tax benefit rule’’ and
the ‘‘off-market issuance rule,’’ which
are intended to prevent distortions of
consolidated taxable income resulting
from the shifting of built-in items from
intercompany obligations, or from the
issuance of obligations at a materially
off-market rate of interest through the
manipulation of a member’s tax
attributes or stock basis. These rules are
aimed at intragroup transactions
otherwise excepted from the deemed
satisfaction-reissuance model (to ensure
that the exceptions cannot be used to
distort consolidated taxable income
E:\FR\FM\29DER1.SGM
29DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 249 (Monday, December 29, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 79318-79324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-30800]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1314
[Docket No. DEA-298F]
RIN 1117-AB13
Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005: Fee for Self-
Certification for Regulated Sellers of Scheduled Listed Chemical
Products
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Department of Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: To comply with the requirement of the Controlled Substances
Act that fees be set at a level to ensure the recovery of the full
costs of operating the various aspects of the Diversion Control
Program, this Final Rule establishes an annual self-certification fee
for certain ``regulated sellers,'' that is, persons and entities
selling scheduled listed chemical products at retail locations who are
required to self-certify with DEA relative to compliance with certain
requirements of the Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005 (CMEA).
This Final Rule establishes the annual self-certification fee for
regulated sellers who are not DEA pharmacy registrants.
DATES: Effective Date: February 1, 2009. The new fee will be in effect
for all new applications electronically sent on or after the effective
date and for all renewal applications electronically sent on or after
the effective date.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark W. Caverly, Chief, Liaison and
Policy Section, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA 22152;
Telephone (202) 307-7297.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 79319]]
I. Background and Statutory Authority
The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) implements the
Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, often
referred to as the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and the Controlled
Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 801-971), as amended. DEA
publishes the implementing regulations for these statutes in Title 21
of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Parts 1300 to 1399. These
regulations are designed to ensure that there is a sufficient supply of
controlled substances for legitimate medical, scientific, research, and
industrial purposes and to deter the diversion of controlled substances
to illegal purposes. The CSA mandates that DEA establish a closed
system of control for manufacturing, distributing, and dispensing
controlled substances. Any person who manufactures, distributes,
dispenses, imports, exports, or conducts research or chemical analysis
with controlled substances must register with DEA (unless exempt) and
comply with the applicable requirements for the activity. The CSA as
amended also requires DEA to regulate the manufacture and distribution
of chemicals that may be used to manufacture controlled substances
illegally. Listed chemicals that are classified as List I chemicals are
important to the manufacture of controlled substances. Those classified
as List II chemicals may be used to manufacture controlled substances.
On March 9, 2006, the President signed the Combat Methamphetamine
Epidemic Act of 2005 (CMEA), which is Title VII of the USA PATRIOT
Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109-177). The CMEA
amends the CSA to change the regulations for selling nonprescription
products that contain ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, phenylpropanolamine,
their salts, optical isomers, and salts of optical isomers. DEA
implemented the retail provisions of CMEA through an Interim Final Rule
entitled ``Retail Sales of Scheduled Listed Chemical Products; Self-
Certification of Regulated Sellers of Scheduled Listed Chemical
Products'' published in the Federal Register September 26, 2006 (71 FR
56008; corrected at 71 FR 60609, October 13, 2006). In that Interim
Final Rule, DEA extensively discussed its intent to issue a rulemaking
to establish the certification fee for regulated sellers of scheduled
listed chemical products and the methodology for calculating fees (see
specifically 71 FR 56013-56015, September 26, 2006; corrected at 71 FR
60609, October 13, 2006). To this end, DEA published a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking proposing self-certification fees for regulated
sellers selling scheduled listed chemical products at retail on October
1, 2007 (72 FR 55712). This rulemaking finalizes that Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking.
Section 886a of the CSA defines the Diversion Control Program as
``the controlled substance and chemical diversion control activities of
the Drug Enforcement Administration,'' which are further defined as the
``activities related to the registration and control of the
manufacture, distribution and dispensing, importation and exportation
of controlled substances and listed chemicals.'' The CSA also states
that reimbursements from the Diversion Control Fee Account `` * * *
shall be made without distinguishing between expenses related to
controlled substances activities and expenses related to chemical
activities.'' [Pub. L. 108-447 Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2005]
In addition, Section 111(b)(3) of the Departments of Commerce,
Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations
Act of 1993 (Pub. L. 102-395), codified at 21 U.S.C. 886a(3), requires
that ``fees charged by the Drug Enforcement Administration under its
diversion control program shall be set at a level that ensures the
recovery of the full costs of operating the various aspects of that
program.''
CMEA implements new requirements governing the sale of scheduled
listed chemical products, defined as nonprescription drug products
containing ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, or phenylpropanolamine. As part
of these requirements, CMEA requires certification for all regulated
sellers of scheduled listed chemical products, defining regulated
seller to mean a retail distributor (including a pharmacy and mobile
retail vendors). The CMEA requires that on and after September 30,
2006, a regulated seller or any of its employees must not sell
scheduled listed chemical products unless it has certified to DEA,
through DEA's Web site. The certification requires the regulated seller
to confirm the following:
Its employees who will be engaged in the sale of scheduled
listed chemical products have undergone training regarding provisions
of CMEA.
Records of the training are maintained.
Without regard to the number of transactions, a regulated
seller may not in a single calendar day sell any purchaser more than
3.6 grams of ephedrine base, 3.6 grams of pseudoephedrine base, or 3.6
grams of phenylpropanolamine base in scheduled listed chemical
products. (A mobile retail vendor may not in any 30-day period sell an
individual purchaser more than 7.5 grams ephedrine base, 7.5 grams
pseudoephedrine base, or 7.5 grams phenylpropanolamine base.)
Nonliquid forms are packaged as required.
Scheduled listed chemical products are stored behind the
counter or in a locked cabinet.
A written or electronic logbook containing the required
information on sales of scheduled listed chemical products is
maintained.
The logbook information will be disclosed only to Federal,
State, or local law enforcement and only to ensure compliance with
Title 21 of the United States Code or to facilitate a product recall.
The regulated seller must train its employees and certify before
either the seller or individual employees may sell scheduled listed
chemical products. The certification is subject to the provisions of 18
U.S.C. 1001. A regulated seller who knowingly or willfully certifies to
facts that are not true is subject to fines and imprisonment.
The CMEA also exempts retail distributors from registration
requirements under the CSA; however, in practice, retail distributors
have not previously registered with DEA because they limited their
sales to below threshold quantities and to products sold in blister
packs.
On October 1, 2007, DEA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
outlining the calculations for the proposed fee and compliance
requirements for the self-certification fee (72 FR 55712).
II. Comments Received
Following publication of the October 1, 2007, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, DEA received seven comments. Comments generally supported
DEA's proposed certification fee approach and methodology and DEA's
exemption of regulated sellers of scheduled listed chemical products
who already maintain an active DEA registration as a pharmacy to
dispense controlled substances. Five of the comments were from
pharmaceutical associations; one comment was from a large chain
pharmacy, and one comment was from an individual.
Fee and fee structure: Commenters generally supported DEA's
proposed fee of $16 to self-certify and supported DEA's calculation of
this fee based on the overall program costs. One commenter noted that
this methodology
[[Page 79320]]
distributes the program costs to all sellers. Several commenters noted
that the fee did not represent a burdensome amount. DEA agrees that the
$16 proposed fee, finalized at $21, will not constitute a financial
burden on regulated sellers and adds that businesses for which the
self-certification fee would have been a barrier have stopped carrying
the products due to other compliance costs associated with CMEA.
Several commenters specifically noted their opposition to calculating
the self-certification fee based on business size or overall volume of
sales. Commenters questioned whether DEA had the statutory authority to
collect such information, and noted that such collection would be
administratively intensive, thereby further increasing fees charged.
DEA also notes that it does not have the statutory authority or
resources to be investigating these business details of regulated
sellers. One commenter, who noted that it did not believe that DEA has
this statutory authority to collect such information, also added that
even if DEA had the statutory authority to collect the type of
information necessary to enable this type of fee structure, it believed
that the administrative burden of collecting this information would
force an increase in self-certification fees to cover such
administrative costs. The commenter therefore opposed this methodology
on both grounds.
Fee exemption for registrants registered to dispense controlled
substances: All seven commenters supported the fee exemption for
regulated sellers who already maintain an annual registration to
dispense controlled substances, i.e., a pharmacy registration. In the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, DEA described the fee exemption for this
group of registrants who already pay an annual fee or annual fee
equivalent to support the operations of the Diversion Control Program.
Harmonization of registration and self-certification: Related to
these comments, five commenters requested that DEA harmonize the self-
certification and annual registration/reregistration process. Currently
the majority of DEA registrants--practitioners (which includes
pharmacies)--renew their registration with DEA every three years and
pay a three-year fee to support the operations of the Diversion Control
Program. DEA periodically recalculates the fee schedule for all
registrants to ensure compliance with the statutory requirement that
the full costs of operating the various aspects of the Diversion
Control Program are supported through registration fees. Because self-
certification occurs annually and registration of practitioners,
including pharmacies, occurs every three years, there is no way to
combine these two processes. That is, because the time frames are not
concurrent, DEA cannot harmonize the renewal of self-certification and
registration/reregistration for pharmacies at this time. DEA has made
every effort to provide as much harmonization as possible by permitting
those pharmacies who register with DEA through the chain registration
process to also self-certify using that process. Furthermore, when
requested by individual registrants, DEA has endeavored to allow the
self-certification to expire in the same month, but not necessarily the
same year, as the DEA registration.
DEA is considering whether to revise the time period for
registration of practitioners (for example, requiring registration on
an annual basis). If DEA pursues this course of action, it will publish
a separate rulemaking requesting public comment on such a change.
Reminder of self-certification requirement: One commenter suggested
that DEA develop an annual outreach program to remind regulated sellers
of their annual self-certification requirement. Because self-
certification is a certification by the regulated seller of compliance
with the requirements of CMEA, DEA believes that it is the
responsibility of the regulated seller to obtain and maintain their
self-certification in good standing. Congress indicated in CMEA that
self-certification is the responsibility of the regulated seller and
strictly limited DEA involvement in the self-certification process (21
U.S.C. 830(e)(1)(B)(iii)).
Signature of self-certification: In the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking DEA noted that it had previously requested comments
regarding who should be authorized to sign the self-certification for
the regulated seller, given that the person must be in a position to
confirm all the self-certification requirements listed above. Two
commenters responded to the request. Both commenters suggested that the
manager of the regulated seller be authorized to sign the self-
certification for the regulated seller. DEA appreciates these responses
and will address this specific issue in a separate rulemaking, as this
Final Rule is intended only to address the self-certification fee and
not other aspects of the self-certification process.
Waiver of self-certification fee for distributors of List I
chemicals: One commenter requested that DEA consider waiving the self-
certification fee for entities that own both distributors of List I
chemicals and retailers of controlled substances (e.g., non-pharmacy
retailers). DEA proposed the waiver of the self-certification fee for
retail pharmacies who already maintain a registration with DEA because
the retail sale of scheduled listed chemical products is essentially
the same activity as dispensing (that is, sale at retail) of controlled
substances. Thus it makes sense to exempt this category of registered
regulated sellers because the activities are in fact similar. However,
the distribution of List I chemicals at the non-retail level is not a
similar activity to retail dispensing or sales to individual
purchasers. DEA also notes that self-certification is only required for
retail (not wholesale) distributors of scheduled listed chemical
products. If, as the commenter claimed, there are entities that
distribute List I chemical products and sell such products at the
retail level, then even prior to enactment of CMEA such entities would
have been required to maintain two separate registrations--one as a
retail distributor and one as a non-retail distributor. Accordingly,
the self-certification fee is not waived for non-retail distributors of
List I chemicals.
Enforcement costs: Finally, one commenter observed that the
calculation of the self-certification fee in the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking did not include any enforcement costs, adding that this
omission was ``astonishingly optimistic'' and suggesting that DEA
include a small amount of anticipated enforcement costs to the overall
fee calculation, and that doing so ``still would not make it
burdensome.'' As DEA noted in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the
self-certification fee included in this Final Rule does not include DEA
activities associated with enforcement and judicial proceedings. CMEA
gives DEA the authority to prohibit a regulated seller from selling
scheduled listed chemical products for certain violations of CMEA.
Following such an order, the affected regulated seller is entitled to
an administrative hearing (if requested in a timely manner). While the
costs of these enforcement activities and the subsequent proceedings
must be supported through fees pursuant to the statutory requirements
previously described above, because DEA is uncertain of the resources
required and the likely costs of these activities, these costs are not
reflected in the self-certification fee contained in this Final Rule.
Once DEA is able to determine the
[[Page 79321]]
frequency of use of these tools and their associated costs, these costs
will be recovered through fees associated with self-certification as
established in future rulemakings.
III. Self-Certification Fee
DEA considers the self-certification requirements of the CMEA to
fall within the legal definition of controlled substance and chemical
diversion control activities as governed by section 886a of the CSA
(see above). Accordingly, these activities fall under the general
operation of the Diversion Control Program and are subject to the
requirements of the Appropriations Act of 1993 that mandates that fees
charged shall be set at a level that ensures the recovery of the full
costs of operating the various aspects of the Diversion Control
Program. The self-certification requirements of CMEA fall under these
``various aspects.'' Therefore, by this Final Rule DEA will charge a
fee for each self-certification to comply with these statutory
requirements and ensure that the full costs of operating the Diversion
Control Program are covered by fees as required by law.
The fee for certification will be applied to all associated costs,
including the initial one-time costs of setting up the certification
program, Web site, and programmatic infrastructure, as well as ongoing
costs associated with the provision of certifications, call center
support, maintenance of the self-certification system, printing costs
for certificates that regulated sellers cannot print, financial
management, and other related costs. DEA has established a program to
train its employees to provide information regarding, and accept,
certifications and must establish the infrastructure necessary for the
program. Required systems include creation of history, renewal cycles,
investigative tools, business validation rules, and development and
maintenance of the self-certification Web site.
As discussed previously, other DEA activities associated with self-
certification and compliance with CMEA include enforcement and judicial
proceedings. CMEA gives DEA the authority to prohibit a regulated
seller from selling scheduled listed chemical products for certain
violations of CMEA. If DEA issues an order to a regulated seller
prohibiting that regulated seller from selling scheduled listed
chemical products, the regulated seller is entitled to an
administrative hearing if the seller files a timely request for a
hearing. The costs of these enforcement activities and the subsequent
proceedings must be supported through fees pursuant to the above
described statutory requirements. However, these costs are not
reflected in the self-certification fees contained in this rulemaking,
as DEA is uncertain of their utilization. Once DEA is able to determine
the frequency of use of these tools and their associated costs, these
costs will be recovered through fees associated with self-certification
as established in future rulemakings.
Regulated sellers submit a certification online via the DEA self-
certification Web site and will pay a fee by credit card at the time of
each certification. DEA calculated this fee based on estimated set-up
costs in Fiscal Year 2006 ($93,369) and Fiscal Years 2007 and 2008
operating and maintenance costs ($1,338,484 and $808,643, respectively)
totaling $2,240,496, as shown in Table 1 below. The initial systems
development and set-up costs will not be repeated in subsequent years.
Thus, the total amount to be recovered for Fiscal Years 2006 through
2008 is $2,240,496. Total annual costs associated with operating the
certification process include staff costs, operational and
administrative costs, Web hosting, monitoring and maintenance costs
(including hardware and software maintenance), and annual inflation
adjustments.
To calculate the fee, DEA divided the total costs for Fiscal Years
2006 through 2008 by the anticipated population of affected regulated
sellers of 55,000. As of October 27, 2008, 53,989 retailers had self-
certified that they were in compliance with the rule. In making the
final fee calculation, DEA doubled the number of self-certified sellers
from 55,000 to 110,000 to reflect one self-certification and one
renewal by each person during Fiscal Years 2006-2008, the time period
for which fees were calculated. DEA notes that it has adjusted the
population of regulated sellers to accurately characterize the current
number of persons self-certified with DEA. This adjustment has resulted
in a higher cost per self-certified location than DEA proposed in the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. All costs are shown in the table below
for Fiscal Years 2006 through 2008. The self-certification costs
reflect the cost per each self-certification per each facility as
required by CMEA.
To minimize administrative and collection burdens, it is DEA's
policy to round all fees up to the nearest dollar when calculating
fees. This is done to ensure that the full cost of the Diversion
Control Program is collected as mandated by statute. Therefore, the fee
for self-certifications will be $21.00.
Table 1--Self-Certification Costs and Fee Calculation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project detail 2006 * 2007 2008 Total cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Planning (1).................................... $3,029 $36,343 $37,002 $76,373
Design, Development, Deployment (2)............. $43,512 $703,863 $71,662 $819,037
Call Center, Finance, Mail Room, Printing (3)... $35,423 $425,075 $432,777 $893,275
Maintenance (4)................................. $11,405 $173,203 $176,341 $360,949
Enhancements (5)................................ .............. .............. $90,861 $90,861
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... $93,369 $1,338,484 $808,643 $2,240,496
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Population...................................... .............. 55,000 55,000 ..............
Cost per certification (= total cost/population) .............. $26.04 $14.71 $20.38
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* 2006 is only one month of operations.
Planning *
Design, Development, Deployment.
Creation of self-certification system **
Operation support includes:
5 FTE, 3% of their time; 1 D/I 5% of their time.
10% allocation of effort, 2 months planning; 6 months development; 2 months testing, Q/A, CM, C&A, deployment.
Call center, finance, distribution and printing operations.
** Self-certification system includes creation of history, renewal cycles, investigative tools, business
validation rules.
[[Page 79322]]
Table 2--Calculation of Fee
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Self-
Cost for FY2006-2008 No. estimated certification Fee for self-
to self-certify and one renewal certification
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$2,241,000.................................. /(55,000 * 2) = $20.38 = $21.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All regulated sellers will pay the $21 fee upon annual self-
certification to the DEA with the exception of those regulated sellers
who already maintain an active registration with DEA to dispense
controlled substances, i.e., pharmacy registrants. In making this
exception, as described in further detail in the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (72 FR 55712), DEA notes that many of the regulated sellers
affected by the self-certification requirement already are registered
with DEA to dispense controlled substances and therefore already pay a
registration/reregistration fee to DEA. The CSA requires that all
manufacturers, importers, exporters, distributors and dispensers (e.g.,
pharmacies) of controlled substances and List I chemicals obtain an
annual registration with DEA. This process also is under the
administration of the Diversion Control Program. For example,
pharmacies registered with DEA to dispense controlled substances pay a
three-year registration fee of $551 (an annual equivalent of $184).
This annual (or three-year) registration fee supports the operations of
the Diversion Control Program, including program priorities and field
management oversight; coordination of major investigations; drafting
and promulgating of regulations relating to the enforcement of the CSA
and other legislation; advice and leadership on state legislation/
regulation; legal control of drugs and chemicals not previously under
Federal control; control of imports and exports of licit controlled
substances and chemicals; program resource planning and allocation, and
investigation, inspection, and cooperative efforts with other law
enforcement entities and the regulated industries, among other
activities.
While these existing registrants are required by the CMEA to self-
certify with DEA if selling scheduled listed chemical products, the
self-certification fee will be waived upon submission of an active DEA
pharmacy registration number in good standing because these registrants
already pay an annual fee (or annual fee equivalent) to support the
operations of the Diversion Control Program.
DEA remains uncertain of the anticipated costs associated with
enforcement activities related to self-certification. Investigative and
other activities designed to ascertain and ensure compliance with CMEA
will require funding in excess of one-time set-up and maintenance
expenses. DEA anticipates publishing a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to
revise the fee for self-certification in the near future. That rule
will address costs related to enforcement activities, as well as other
expenses related to self-certification of regulated sellers of
scheduled listed chemical products. As with all fees collected by DEA,
fees collected beyond Fiscal Year 2008, the projected end of the three-
year cycle discussed above, will ensure recovery of the full costs of
the various aspects of the Diversion Control Program as mandated by
statute (21 U.S.C. 886a). Those various aspects of the Diversion
Control Program could include, among other things, costs of enforcement
activities associated with self-certification.
Methodology Regarding Establishment of Fee
CMEA specifically states that a separate certification is required
for each separate location at which scheduled listed chemical products
are sold. As such, mobile retail vendors must certify for each location
at which sales transactions occur, e.g., a fairground one week, a
convention center the next, etc. Similarly, large corporate chains such
as chain pharmacies must certify for each separate location at which
scheduled listed chemical products are sold. Each location must self-
certify for itself, although DEA has established a process for the
self-certification of pharmacies participating in DEA's chain pharmacy
renewal program.
Additionally, CMEA mandates self-certification for all regulated
sellers irrespective of the extent such entities or persons handle
scheduled listed chemical products. Accordingly, DEA may not alter the
fee structure to account for the extent to which self-certifiers handle
these products, for example adjusting self-certification fees according
to sales volume or size of establishment. DEA notes, as discussed
above, that all commenters supported this position.
Finally, as referenced earlier in this rulemaking, CMEA requires
that all persons selling scheduled listed chemical products at retail
self-certify to DEA, regardless of whether those persons are already
registered with DEA to handle controlled substances or List I
chemicals.
In its Interim Final Rule establishing self-certification and other
requirements (71 FR 56008, September 26, 2006; corrected at 71 FR
60609, October 13, 2006), DEA established that certification must be
renewed annually. However, to spread the population of self-certifiers
throughout the year (i.e., to prevent all persons who are self-
certified from continuing to renew in the month of September every
year), DEA in its Interim Final Rule indicated that it will assign
self-certifiers to one of 12 groups. Each group will have an expiration
date that will be the last day of a month from 12 to 23 months after
the initial filing. The expiration date is contained in each regulated
seller's self-certification certificate. After the second
certification, regulated sellers will be required to certify annually.
Thus, between September 30, 2006, and the end of Fiscal Year 2008 on
September 30, 2008, all self-certifiers will have initially self-
certified and renewed their certification once, assuming they continue
to sell scheduled listed chemical products at retail. Payment of the
self-certification fee will be completed at the same time as self-
certification.
Regulatory Certifications
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Acting Administrator hereby certifies that this rulemaking has
been drafted in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601-612), has reviewed this regulation, and by approving it
certifies that this regulation will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. As discussed
previously, DEA has adjusted the population of regulated sellers to
accurately characterize the current number of persons self-certified
with DEA. This adjustment has resulted in a higher cost per self-
certified location ($21) than DEA proposed in the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking ($16).
The Final Rule will affect a substantial number of small entities,
but
[[Page 79323]]
will not have a significant economic impact. The fee is minimal--$21 a
year. The smallest firms potentially covered are general merchandise
stores (NAICS 45299) where the average sales of the smallest firms are
$60,000 a year according to the 2002 Retail Trade-Subject Series of the
Economic Census. The smallest firms in the other sectors (NAICS 44511
(grocery stores), 44512 (convenience stores), 44611 (drug stores),
44711 (gas stations with convenience stores)), except for discount
department stores (NAICS 452112) and superstores (NAICS 45291), have
annual sales of between $120,000 and $150,000. There are no discount
department stores or superstores with annual sales of less than $1
million and $5 million, respectively. The annual fee, therefore, would
represent less than 0.05 percent of sales for the smallest store and
generally about 0.01 percent of sales, which does not impose a
significant economic impact.
Executive Order 12866
The Acting Administrator further certifies that this rulemaking has
been drafted in accordance with the principles in Executive Order 12866
section 1(b). It has been determined that this is a significant
regulatory action. Therefore, this action has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
Regulated Sellers. As of October 27, 2008, 53,989 retailers had
self-certified with DEA. Table 3 presents the number of retailers by
sector and indicates whether they have indicated that they are DEA
registrants.
Table 3--Sectors Selling Scheduled Listed Chemical Products
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-
NAICS Registrants registrants
certified certified
------------------------------------------------------------------------
44511 Grocery stores.................... 3,781 850
44611 Pharmacy and drug stores.......... 27,678 500
452112 Discount Department Stores....... 1,777 25
45291 Warehouse Clubs and Superstores... 4,373 6
-------------------------------
Subtotal............................ 37,609 1,381
------------------------------------------------------------------------
44512 Convenience stores................ 3 5,499
44711 Gas Stations with convenience 0 9,020
stores.................................
45299 All other general merchandise 9 214
stores.................................
Other................................... 42 212
-------------------------------
Total........................... 37,663 16,326
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Costs/Benefits. As discussed in the previous sections, DEA has
estimated costs of $2,240,496 for Fiscal Years 2006 through 2008 for
DEA to establish and support the regulated seller self-certification
program, which CMEA mandates. As required by law, this cost will be
recovered from regulated sellers through a self-certification fee. As
noted in the previous section, the fee imposes a minimal burden on
regulated sellers. CMEA requires self-certification as a condition of
selling these products. The fee will allow DEA to operate a program
needed to permit regulated sellers to continue offering scheduled
listed chemical products to their customers.
Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable standards set forth in
Sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 Civil Justice
Reform.
Executive Order 13132
This rulemaking does not preempt or modify any provision of state
law; nor does it impose enforcement responsibilities on any state; nor
does it diminish the power of any state to enforce its own laws.
Accordingly, this rulemaking does not have federalism implications
warranting the application of Executive Order 13132.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by state, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $120
million or more (adjusted for inflation) in any one year, and will not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (Congressional
Review Act). This rule will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices;
or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1314
Drug traffic control, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
0
For the reasons set out above, 21 CFR Part 1314 is amended as follows:
PART 1314--RETAIL SALE OF SCHEDULED LISTED CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 1314 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 802, 830, 842, 871(b), 875, 877, 886a.
0
2. Section 1314.42 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1314.42 Self-certification fee; time and method of fee payment.
(a) A regulated seller must pay a fee for each self-certification.
For each initial application to self-certify, and for the renewal of
each existing self-certification, a regulated seller shall pay a fee of
$21.
(b) The fee for self-certification shall be waived for any person
holding a current, DEA registration in good standing as a pharmacy to
dispense controlled substances.
(c) A regulated seller shall pay the fee at the time of self-
certification.
(d) Payment shall be made by credit card.
(e) The self-certification fee is not refundable.
[[Page 79324]]
December 18, 2008.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. E8-30800 Filed 12-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P