Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; PDUFA Pilot Project Proprietary Name Review, 78813-78814 [E8-30587]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 23, 2008 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0648]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; PDUFA Pilot
Project Proprietary Name Review
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS
ACTION:
Notice
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the
proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), Federal agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each proposed
extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on
the information collection associated
with the evaluation of proposed
propriety names by pharmaceutical
firms and the submission of the data
generated from those evaluations to
FDA for review under a pilot program.
FDA plans to begin enrollment in the
pilot program by the end of fiscal year
(FY) 2009.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on the collection of
information by February 23, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments on the collection of
information to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments on the collection of
information to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All
comments should be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of
Information Management (HFA–710),
Food and Drug Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857,
301–796–3792.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of
information that they conduct or
sponsor. ‘‘Collection of information’’ is
defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes agency requests
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:29 Dec 22, 2008
Jkt 217001
or requirements that members of the
public submit reports, keep records, or
provide information to a third party.
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), requires Federal
agencies to provide a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register for each proposed
collection of information before
submitting the collection to OMB for
approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing this
notice of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the collection of
information associated with the pilot
program, FDA invites comments on the
following topics: (1) Whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
FDA’s functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of FDA’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
PDUFA Pilot Project Proprietary Name
Review
In the Federal Register of October 7,
2008 (73 FR 58604), FDA announced the
availability of a concept paper entitled
‘‘PDUFA Pilot Project Proprietary Name
Review.’’ The concept paper describes
how pharmaceutical firms may evaluate
proposed proprietary names and submit
the data generated from those
evaluations to FDA for review under a
pilot program to begin by the end of FY
2009.
On September 27, 2007, the President
signed into law the Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of
2007 (Public Law 110–85, 121 Stat.
823), which includes the
reauthorization and expansion of the
Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA
IV). As part of the reauthorization of
PDUFA IV, FDA committed to certain
performance goals, including the goal of
using user fees to implement various
measures to reduce, among other things,
medication errors related to look-alike
and sound-alike product proprietary
names. FDA also agreed to develop and
implement a voluntary pilot program to
enable pharmaceutical firms
participating in the pilot to evaluate
proposed proprietary names and to
submit the data generated from those
evaluations to FDA for review. The
concept paper is intended to help
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78813
pharmaceutical firms choose
appropriate proprietary names for their
drug and biological products before
submitting marketing applications to
FDA and describes how pharmaceutical
firms may use ‘‘best practices’’ to carry
out their own proprietary name reviews
and provide FDA with the data that
result from those reviews. The goals of
the concept paper and the voluntary
pilot program are to minimize the use of
names that are misleading or that are
likely to lead to medication errors, to
make FDA’s marketing application
review more efficient, and to make
regulatory decisions more transparent.
The concept paper explains how an
applicant who chooses to participate in
the pilot program could assess a
proposed proprietary name for safety
(i.e., potential for medication errors)
and, at the applicant’s option, for
promotional implications, before
marketing application approval and
subsequent marketing of a drug or
biological product in the United States,
and how to submit the results of the
assessment for review under the pilot
program.
As required by the PRA, this
document is the first of two Federal
Register notices that FDA must publish
to provide an opportunity for public
comment on the information collection
that will result from the pilot program.
The information described in the
concept paper and the data collected
may not be submitted to FDA until OMB
has approved the information collection
associated with the pilot program. After
OMB approval, FDA will accept
requests to register for the pilot
program. FDA will announce OMB’s
approval and other details on
participating in the pilot program in the
Federal Register. FDA expects that the
pilot program will begin by the end of
FY 2009.
The information collection that will
result from the voluntary pilot program,
as described in the concept paper,
consists of the following:
• Applicants should contact FDA to
register and indicate the approximate
date of their proprietary name
submission, as described in the concept
paper and as will be described in more
detail when FDA announces OMB’s
approval and the specific information
on participating in the pilot program.
• Applicants should contact the
appropriate FDA Center 120 days prior
to the intended date of the proposed
proprietary name submission to discuss
the specific details of the planned
submission. Applicants should
communicate with the Director in the
Division of Medication Error Prevention
and Analysis in the Office of
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
78814
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 23, 2008 / Notices
Surveillance and Epidemiology in the
Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, or the Branch Chief at the
Advertising and Promotion Labeling
Branch of the Division of Case
Management in the Office of
Compliance and Biologics Quality in the
Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research, concerning any questions
about their proposed submissions. For
prescription products, applicants
should inform the appropriate center at
the 120-day pre-submission discussion
if they plan to use alternative or
additional methods to evaluate the
safety of their proposed proprietary
name. For nonprescription products,
sponsors should discuss with FDA
different protocols that could be used
for their specific drug products prior to
the submission of the proprietary name.
• Applicants should submit two
separate sets of product name-related
information to enable parallel reviews
by FDA as follows: (1) A comprehensive
evaluation of the proposed proprietary
name including the information and
data listed in Appendix B (‘‘Proposed
Template For A Pilot Program
Submission’’) of the concept paper; and
(2) the proprietary name information
that they would ordinarily submit under
FDA’s current practice. (Note: The
proprietary name information ordinarily
submitted under FDA’s current practice
is not included in the estimates in table
1 of this document because this
information collection is already
approved under OMB Control Numbers
0910–0001 and 0910–0338).
• After review of the proprietary
name submissions, and if FDA informs
the applicant that the proposed firstchoice proprietary name is
unacceptable, the applicant should
confirm in writing that it would like its
originally submitted second-choice
name reviewed, or the applicant should
submit an alternative second-choice
name along with the information
described in the concept paper. At that
time, FDA will begin review of the
second-choice name. If an applicant has
submitted a complete proprietary name
analysis for the second-choice name, the
responsible center will use discretion to
determine whether to review the
applicant’s analysis in addition to
conducting its own analysis using the
traditional approach. Although FDA
would ideally review the applicant’s
completed proprietary name analysis for
the second-choice name, factors such as
staffing and timelines will be used in
making this determination.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information in table 1 of
this document. The ‘‘hours per
response’’ is for all of the submissions
and notifications to FDA described
under the bulleted paragraphs above
and is based on information provided by
industry as well as FDA’s familiarity
with the time required for this
information collection.
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
No. of
Respondents
Pilot Project Proprietary Name
Review
1 There
Annual Frequency
per Response
20
Total Annual
Responses
1
Hours per
Response
20
Total Hours
480
9,600
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Please note that on January 15, 2008,
the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to
the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a
Government-wide, electronic docket
management system. Electronic
comments or submissions will be
accepted by FDA only through FDMS at
https://www.regulations.gov.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2004–D–0375] (formerly
Docket No. 2004D–0555)
Guidance for Industry and Food and
Drug Administration Staff; ‘‘Class II
Special Controls Guidance Document:
Labeling for Natural Rubber Latex
Condoms Classified Under 21 CFR
884.5300’’; Availability
Dated: December 16, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E8–30587 Filed 12–22–08; 8:45 am]
HHS.
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
ACTION:
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of the guidance entitled
‘‘Class II Special Controls Guidance
Document: Labeling for Natural Rubber
Latex Condoms Classified Under 21 CFR
884.5300.’’ This guidance document
describes a means by which male
condoms made of natural rubber latex
(latex condoms) may comply with the
requirement of special controls for class
II devices. FDA believes that the
labeling recommendations contained in
this guidance, in addition to general
controls, will provide reasonable
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:29 Dec 22, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of latex condoms without spermicidal
lubricant. In the Federal Register of
November 10, 2008 (73 FR 66522), FDA
published a final rule that amended the
classification regulation for condoms
from class II (performance standards) to
class II (special controls) and designated
this guidance document as the special
control for male condoms made of
natural rubber latex classified under
that regulation.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on this guidance at any time.
General comments on agency guidance
documents are welcome at any time.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of the guidance document
entitled ‘‘Class II Special Controls
Guidance Document: Labeling for
Natural Rubber Latex Condoms
Classified Under 21 CFR 884.5300’’ to
the Division of Small Manufacturers,
International, and Consumer Assistance
(HFZ–220), Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
Rockville, MD 20850. Send one selfaddressed adhesive label to assist that
office in processing your request, or fax
your request to 240–276–3151. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 247 (Tuesday, December 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78813-78814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-30587]
[[Page 78813]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0648]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; PDUFA Pilot Project Proprietary Name Review
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS
ACTION: Notice
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on the information collection
associated with the evaluation of proposed propriety names by
pharmaceutical firms and the submission of the data generated from
those evaluations to FDA for review under a pilot program. FDA plans to
begin enrollment in the pilot program by the end of fiscal year (FY)
2009.
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on the collection of
information by February 23, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of
Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3792.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information that they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)), requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register for each proposed collection of information before
submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing this notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
With respect to the collection of information associated with the
pilot program, FDA invites comments on the following topics: (1)
Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of FDA's functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's
estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of information
technology.
PDUFA Pilot Project Proprietary Name Review
In the Federal Register of October 7, 2008 (73 FR 58604), FDA
announced the availability of a concept paper entitled ``PDUFA Pilot
Project Proprietary Name Review.'' The concept paper describes how
pharmaceutical firms may evaluate proposed proprietary names and submit
the data generated from those evaluations to FDA for review under a
pilot program to begin by the end of FY 2009.
On September 27, 2007, the President signed into law the Food and
Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-85, 121
Stat. 823), which includes the reauthorization and expansion of the
Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA IV). As part of the
reauthorization of PDUFA IV, FDA committed to certain performance
goals, including the goal of using user fees to implement various
measures to reduce, among other things, medication errors related to
look-alike and sound-alike product proprietary names. FDA also agreed
to develop and implement a voluntary pilot program to enable
pharmaceutical firms participating in the pilot to evaluate proposed
proprietary names and to submit the data generated from those
evaluations to FDA for review. The concept paper is intended to help
pharmaceutical firms choose appropriate proprietary names for their
drug and biological products before submitting marketing applications
to FDA and describes how pharmaceutical firms may use ``best
practices'' to carry out their own proprietary name reviews and provide
FDA with the data that result from those reviews. The goals of the
concept paper and the voluntary pilot program are to minimize the use
of names that are misleading or that are likely to lead to medication
errors, to make FDA's marketing application review more efficient, and
to make regulatory decisions more transparent. The concept paper
explains how an applicant who chooses to participate in the pilot
program could assess a proposed proprietary name for safety (i.e.,
potential for medication errors) and, at the applicant's option, for
promotional implications, before marketing application approval and
subsequent marketing of a drug or biological product in the United
States, and how to submit the results of the assessment for review
under the pilot program.
As required by the PRA, this document is the first of two Federal
Register notices that FDA must publish to provide an opportunity for
public comment on the information collection that will result from the
pilot program. The information described in the concept paper and the
data collected may not be submitted to FDA until OMB has approved the
information collection associated with the pilot program. After OMB
approval, FDA will accept requests to register for the pilot program.
FDA will announce OMB's approval and other details on participating in
the pilot program in the Federal Register. FDA expects that the pilot
program will begin by the end of FY 2009.
The information collection that will result from the voluntary
pilot program, as described in the concept paper, consists of the
following:
Applicants should contact FDA to register and indicate the
approximate date of their proprietary name submission, as described in
the concept paper and as will be described in more detail when FDA
announces OMB's approval and the specific information on participating
in the pilot program.
Applicants should contact the appropriate FDA Center 120
days prior to the intended date of the proposed proprietary name
submission to discuss the specific details of the planned submission.
Applicants should communicate with the Director in the Division of
Medication Error Prevention and Analysis in the Office of
[[Page 78814]]
Surveillance and Epidemiology in the Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, or the Branch Chief at the Advertising and Promotion Labeling
Branch of the Division of Case Management in the Office of Compliance
and Biologics Quality in the Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research, concerning any questions about their proposed submissions.
For prescription products, applicants should inform the appropriate
center at the 120-day pre-submission discussion if they plan to use
alternative or additional methods to evaluate the safety of their
proposed proprietary name. For nonprescription products, sponsors
should discuss with FDA different protocols that could be used for
their specific drug products prior to the submission of the proprietary
name.
Applicants should submit two separate sets of product
name-related information to enable parallel reviews by FDA as follows:
(1) A comprehensive evaluation of the proposed proprietary name
including the information and data listed in Appendix B (``Proposed
Template For A Pilot Program Submission'') of the concept paper; and
(2) the proprietary name information that they would ordinarily submit
under FDA's current practice. (Note: The proprietary name information
ordinarily submitted under FDA's current practice is not included in
the estimates in table 1 of this document because this information
collection is already approved under OMB Control Numbers 0910-0001 and
0910-0338).
After review of the proprietary name submissions, and if
FDA informs the applicant that the proposed first-choice proprietary
name is unacceptable, the applicant should confirm in writing that it
would like its originally submitted second-choice name reviewed, or the
applicant should submit an alternative second-choice name along with
the information described in the concept paper. At that time, FDA will
begin review of the second-choice name. If an applicant has submitted a
complete proprietary name analysis for the second-choice name, the
responsible center will use discretion to determine whether to review
the applicant's analysis in addition to conducting its own analysis
using the traditional approach. Although FDA would ideally review the
applicant's completed proprietary name analysis for the second-choice
name, factors such as staffing and timelines will be used in making
this determination.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information in table
1 of this document. The ``hours per response'' is for all of the
submissions and notifications to FDA described under the bulleted
paragraphs above and is based on information provided by industry as
well as FDA's familiarity with the time required for this information
collection.
Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of Annual Frequency Total Annual Hours per
Respondents per Response Responses Response Total Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pilot Project Proprietary Name Review 20 1 20 480 9,600
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Please note that on January 15, 2008, the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a Government-wide, electronic docket management
system. Electronic comments or submissions will be accepted by FDA only
through FDMS at https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: December 16, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-30587 Filed 12-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S