Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited Model DHC-7 Airplanes, 78673-78675 [E8-30514]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of these same
type designs. This proposed AD would
require accomplishing the actions
specified in the service information
described previously.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 765 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 2 to 3 work-hours per
product to comply with this proposed
AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost
about $130 to $195 per airplane. Based
on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this proposed AD to U.S. operators up
to $332,775 fleet cost, or between $290
and $435 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:42 Dec 22, 2008
Jkt 217001
You can find our regulatory
evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2008–1326;
Directorate Identifier 2008–NM–141–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by February
6, 2009.
78673
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 757–52–0090, dated
September 21, 2007.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(g)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, ATTN:
Patrick Gillespie, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin
Safety and Environmental Systems Branch,
ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 917–6429; fax (425)
917–6590; has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
December 12, 2008.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–30481 Filed 12–22–08; 8:45 am]
Affected ADs
(b) None.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 747–
100, 747–100B, 747–100B SUD, 747–200B,
747–200C, 747–200F, 747–300, 747–400,
747–400D, 747–400F, 747SR, and 747SP
series airplanes, certificated in any category,
as identified in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 747–52–2286, dated
September 28, 2007; and Boeing Model 757–
200, –200PF, and –300 series airplanes,
certificated in any category, as identified in
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
757–52–0090, dated September 21, 2007.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of
problems associated with the uncommanded
operation of cargo doors. We are issuing this
AD to prevent injuries to persons and damage
to the airplane and equipment.
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
Replacement
(f) Within 24 months after the effective
date of this AD, replace the control switches
as specified in paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this
AD, as applicable. Repeat the replacements
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 6 years.
(1) For Model 747 airplanes: Replace the
control switches of the forward, aft, and nose
cargo doors in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 747–52–
2286, dated September 28, 2007.
(2) For Model 757 airplanes: Replace the
control switches of cargo doors 1 and 2 in
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–1330; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–138–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air
Limited Model DHC–7 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as: ‘‘Transport Canada has
received numerous service difficulty
reports concerning Viking DHC–7 and
Bombardier DHC–8 aircraft fluorescent
lamp holder damage due to overheating.
It has been determined that lamp holder
overheating is a result of arcing between
the fluorescent tube pins and the lamp
holder contacts when the tube is not
properly seated during installation.
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
78674
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Overheating of lamp holders, if not
corrected, could generate fumes and
smoke.’’
The unsafe condition could result in
an in-flight fire. The proposed AD
would require actions that are intended
to address the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 22, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Viking Air
Limited, 9574 Hampden Road, Sidney,
British Columbia V8L 8V5, Canada;
telephone 250–656–7227; fax 250–656–
0673; e-mail
technical.publications@vikingair.com;
Internet https://www.vikingair.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221 or 425–227–1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wing Chan, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Flight Test Branch, ANE–
172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York
11590; telephone (516) 228–7311; fax
(516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:42 Dec 22, 2008
Jkt 217001
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2008–1330; Directorate Identifier
2008–NM–138–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2008–27,
dated July 4, 2008 (referred to after this
as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
Transport Canada has received numerous
service difficulty reports concerning Viking
DHC–7 and Bombardier DHC–8 aircraft
fluorescent lamp holder damage due to
overheating. It has been determined that
lamp holder overheating is a result of arcing
between the fluorescent tube pins and the
lamp holder contacts when the tube is not
properly seated during installation.
Overheating of lamp holders, if not corrected,
could generate fumes and smoke, causing
concern to passengers and crew.
This directive mandates repetitive
inspection[s] for proper installation [and
functioning] of fluorescent tubes and
prohibits installation of non-arc-protected
replacement fluorescent lamp ballasts.
The unsafe condition could result in an
in-flight fire. The corrective actions
include replacing any lamps that are not
properly seated in the lamp holder, and
replacing any broken, non-functioning
lamp holders. Replacing all affected
fluorescent lamp ballasts would
terminate the repetitive inspections.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Viking Air Limited has issued Service
Bulletin V7–33–01, dated February 28,
2008. The actions described in this
service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified
in the MCAI.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the
proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 21 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $80 per work-hour. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$1,680, or $80 per product, per
inspection cycle.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
certificated in any category; serial numbers 1
through 113 inclusive, with Modifications 7/
2444 and 7/2445 incorporated.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
Transport Canada has received numerous
service difficulty reports concerning Viking
DHC–7 and Bombardier DHC–8 aircraft
fluorescent lamp holder damage due to
overheating. It has been determined that
lamp holder overheating is a result of arcing
between the fluorescent tube pins and the
lamp holder contacts when the tube is not
properly seated during installation.
Overheating of lamp holders, if not corrected,
could generate fumes and smoke, causing
concern to passengers and crew.
This directive mandates repetitive
inspection[s] for proper installation [and
functioning] of fluorescent tubes and
prohibits installation of non-arc-protected
replacement fluorescent lamp ballasts.
The unsafe condition could result in an inflight fire. The corrective actions include
replacing any lamps that are not properly
seated in the lamp holder, and replacing any
broken, non-functioning lamp holders.
Replacing all affected fluorescent lamp
ballasts would terminate the repetitive
inspections.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Viking Air Limited (Formerly Bombardier,
Inc.): Docket No. FAA–2008–1330;
Directorate Identifier 2008–NM–138–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by January
22, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Viking Air Limited
Model DHC–7–1, DHC–7–100, DHC–7–101,
DHC–7–102, and DHC–7–103 airplanes,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:42 Dec 22, 2008
Jkt 217001
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 33: Lights.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions.
(1) Within 1,000 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD: Perform a visual
inspection to ensure proper installation and
functioning of the fluorescent tubes in the
lamp holders, and perform all applicable
corrective actions before further flight, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Viking Service Bulletin V7–
33–01, dated February 28, 2008. Repeat the
inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 1,000 flight hours.
(2) Replacing all fluorescent lamp ballasts
having part number (P/N) BAO8006–1 and
BA[O]8006–28–1 with new fluorescent lamp
ballasts having P/N BR9000–21, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Viking Service Bulletin V7–
33–01, dated February 28, 2008, terminates
the repetitive inspections required by
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Wing
Chan, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78675
Flight Test Branch, ANE–172, FAA, New
York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, New York 11590; telephone (516)
228–7311; fax (516) 794–5531. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness
Directive CF–2008–27, dated July 4, 2008,
and Viking Service Bulletin V7–33–01, dated
February 28, 2008, for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
December 13, 2008.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–30514 Filed 12–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–1325; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–157–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 727–281 Airplanes Equipped
With Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Installed in
Accordance With Supplemental Type
Certificate SA3449NM
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Boeing Model 727–281
airplanes. This proposed AD would
require deactivation of Rogerson
Aircraft Corporation auxiliary fuel
tanks. This proposed AD results from
fuel system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer, which identified
potential unsafe conditions but has not
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 247 (Tuesday, December 23, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 78673-78675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-30514]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-1330; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-138-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited Model DHC-7
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as: ``Transport Canada has received numerous service
difficulty reports concerning Viking DHC-7 and Bombardier DHC-8
aircraft fluorescent lamp holder damage due to overheating. It has been
determined that lamp holder overheating is a result of arcing between
the fluorescent tube pins and the lamp holder contacts when the tube is
not properly seated during installation.
[[Page 78674]]
Overheating of lamp holders, if not corrected, could generate fumes and
smoke.''
The unsafe condition could result in an in-flight fire. The
proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 22,
2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Viking Air Limited, 9574 Hampden Road, Sidney, British Columbia V8L
8V5, Canada; telephone 250-656-7227; fax 250-656-0673; e-mail
technical.publications@vikingair.com; Internet https://
www.vikingair.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wing Chan, Aerospace Engineer, Systems
and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft Certification
Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590;
telephone (516) 228-7311; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-1330;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-138-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2008-27, dated July 4, 2008 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''),
to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
Transport Canada has received numerous service difficulty
reports concerning Viking DHC-7 and Bombardier DHC-8 aircraft
fluorescent lamp holder damage due to overheating. It has been
determined that lamp holder overheating is a result of arcing
between the fluorescent tube pins and the lamp holder contacts when
the tube is not properly seated during installation. Overheating of
lamp holders, if not corrected, could generate fumes and smoke,
causing concern to passengers and crew.
This directive mandates repetitive inspection[s] for proper
installation [and functioning] of fluorescent tubes and prohibits
installation of non-arc-protected replacement fluorescent lamp
ballasts.
The unsafe condition could result in an in-flight fire. The corrective
actions include replacing any lamps that are not properly seated in the
lamp holder, and replacing any broken, non-functioning lamp holders.
Replacing all affected fluorescent lamp ballasts would terminate the
repetitive inspections. You may obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Viking Air Limited has issued Service Bulletin V7-33-01, dated
February 28, 2008. The actions described in this service information
are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 21 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $1,680, or $80 per product, per inspection
cycle.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for
[[Page 78675]]
safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Viking Air Limited (Formerly Bombardier, Inc.): Docket No. FAA-2008-
1330; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-138-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by January 22, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Viking Air Limited Model DHC-7-1, DHC-7-
100, DHC-7-101, DHC-7-102, and DHC-7-103 airplanes, certificated in
any category; serial numbers 1 through 113 inclusive, with
Modifications 7/2444 and 7/2445 incorporated.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 33: Lights.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
Transport Canada has received numerous service difficulty
reports concerning Viking DHC-7 and Bombardier DHC-8 aircraft
fluorescent lamp holder damage due to overheating. It has been
determined that lamp holder overheating is a result of arcing
between the fluorescent tube pins and the lamp holder contacts when
the tube is not properly seated during installation. Overheating of
lamp holders, if not corrected, could generate fumes and smoke,
causing concern to passengers and crew.
This directive mandates repetitive inspection[s] for proper
installation [and functioning] of fluorescent tubes and prohibits
installation of non-arc-protected replacement fluorescent lamp
ballasts.
The unsafe condition could result in an in-flight fire. The
corrective actions include replacing any lamps that are not properly
seated in the lamp holder, and replacing any broken, non-functioning
lamp holders. Replacing all affected fluorescent lamp ballasts would
terminate the repetitive inspections.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Within 1,000 flight hours after the effective date of this
AD: Perform a visual inspection to ensure proper installation and
functioning of the fluorescent tubes in the lamp holders, and
perform all applicable corrective actions before further flight, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Viking Service
Bulletin V7-33-01, dated February 28, 2008. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,000 flight hours.
(2) Replacing all fluorescent lamp ballasts having part number
(P/N) BAO8006-1 and BA[O]8006-28-1 with new fluorescent lamp
ballasts having P/N BR9000-21, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Viking Service Bulletin V7-33-01, dated February 28,
2008, terminates the repetitive inspections required by paragraph
(f)(1) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Wing Chan, Aerospace
Engineer, Systems and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York
ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590;
telephone (516) 228-7311; fax (516) 794-5531. Before using any
approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards
District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2008-27,
dated July 4, 2008, and Viking Service Bulletin V7-33-01, dated
February 28, 2008, for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 13, 2008.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-30514 Filed 12-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P