Production Incentives for Cellulosic Biofuels; Reverse Auction Procedures and Standards, 78663-78670 [E8-30500]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
amount decreases for the larger merged
entity due to the threshold and percent
discount in factor 4 (discussed in
alternative 2). To remedy this, we could
change that factor as discussed in
alternative 2. Or, we could require that
the bond posted by the merged entity
equal the combination of the amount
that would have been required of each
individual entity involved in the merger
or acquisition.
Other Alternatives
We also invite the submission of
suggestions on other alternatives to
replace or supplement these proposed
changes in the bond formulas because
reasonable bonds alone that are posted
by market agencies, packers and dealers
may not ensure that the financial
interests of livestock sellers and
consignors are protected. We expect that
any revision to the formulas for
calculating bond amounts will increase
the cost to market agencies, dealers, and
packers to maintain the determined
reasonable bond coverage.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This advance notice of proposed
rulemaking has been determined to be
not significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866, and therefore,
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
E-Government Act Compliance
GIPSA is committed to complying
with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Terry D. Van Doren,
Administrator, Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyard Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–30515 Filed 12–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–KD–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 452
RIN 1904–AB73
Production Incentives for Cellulosic
Biofuels; Reverse Auction Procedures
and Standards
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NOPR) and opportunity for comment.
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy
(DOE) today publishes a proposed rule
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:42 Dec 22, 2008
Jkt 217001
to establish the procedures and
standards for reverse auctions of
production incentives for cellulosic
biofuels pursuant to section 942 of the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005).
DATES: Public comment on this
proposed rule will be accepted until
January 22, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 1904–AB73, by any of
the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:/
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
2. E-mail to EPAct942@go.doe.gov.
Include RIN 1904–AB73 in the subject
line of the e-mail. Please include the full
body of your comments in the text of the
message or as an attachment.
3. Mail: Address written comments to
James Spaeth, U.S. Department of
Energy, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO
80401.
If you submit information that you
believe to be exempt by law from public
disclosure, you should submit one
complete copy, as well as one copy from
which the information claimed to be
exempt by law from public disclosure
has been deleted. DOE is responsible for
the final determination with regard to
disclosure or nondisclosure of the
information and for treating it
accordingly under the DOE Freedom of
Information Act regulations at 10 CFR
1004.11.
Due to potential delays in DOE’s
receipt and processing of mail sent
through the U.S. Postal Service, we
encourage respondents to submit
comments electronically to ensure
timely receipt.
You may obtain copies of comments
submitted in response to this notice of
proposed rulemaking by contacting Mr.
James Spaeth.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
James Spaeth, U.S. Department of
Energy, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO
80401; (303) 275–4771;
jim.spaeth@go.doe.gov; or Mr. Edward
Myers, Office of the General Counsel,
U.S. Department of Energy, Mailstop
GC–72, Room 6B–256, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585; (202) 586–3397
or edward.myers@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Discussion of Proposed Rule
III. Regulatory Review
IV. Approval by the Office of the Secretary
I. Background
Section 942 of the Energy Policy Act
of 2005, Public Law No. 109–58 (August
8, 2005), requires the Secretary of
Energy (Secretary), in consultation with
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78663
the Secretary of Agriculture, the
Secretary of Defense, and the
Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency, to establish an
incentive program for the production of
cellulosic biofuels and to implement
that program by means of a ‘‘reverse
auction.’’ Section 942(a) states that the
purposes of the program are to: ‘‘(1)
Accelerate deployment and
commercialization of biofuels; (2)
deliver the first 1 billion gallons of
annual cellulosic biofuel production by
2015; (3) ensure biofuels produced after
2015 are cost competitive with gasoline
and diesel; and (4) ensure that small
feedstock producers and rural small
businesses are full participants in the
development of the cellulosic biofuels
industry.’’ In order to achieve these
purposes, the Secretary is to award
production incentives on a per gallon
basis to eligible entities by means of a
reverse auction. Under section 942, the
first reverse auction is required annually
until the earlier of the first year that
annual production of cellulosic biofuels
in the United States reaches 1 billion
gallons or 10 years after enactment of
EPAct 2005, i.e., August 8, 2015.
However, pursuant to section 202 of
the Energy Independence and Security
Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110–140) (EISA),
the Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency is required to issue
regulations that implement certain
Renewable Fuel Standards, including
regulations to ensure that transportation
fuel sold or introduced into commerce
in the United States (except in
noncontiguous States or territories), on
an annual average basis, contains at
least 1 billion gallons of cellulosic
biofuel by calendar year 2013.
Consequently, if the Renewable Fuel
Standard for cellulosic biofuel under
EISA is achieved, the last reverse
auction under section 942 of EPAct
2005 would occur in 2013.
II. Discussion of Proposed Rule
A. Overview
The proposed rule would establish
procedures for the reverse auction and
standards for making production
incentive awards. The eligibility
standards include both pre-auction
requirements which must be met prior
to an entity’s participation in a reverse
auction under section 942 and several
post-auction standards which must be
met as a condition of receiving an
award. The post-auction standards are
especially necessary if the Nation is to
achieve the long-term goals of section
942, including delivery of the first one
billion gallons of annual cellulosic
biofuel production by 2015, and
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
78664
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
establishment of a biofuels industry
after 2015 that is cost competitive with
gasoline and diesel. The post-auction
standards are thus intended to ensure
that successful bidders make real and
meaningful progress toward the
production of cellulosic biofuels in
commercially significant quantities.
DOE believes that as successive auctions
yield more and more production of
cellulosic biofuels, the Nation will move
closer to achieving section 942’s longterm national goal of a commercially
viable production capability after 2015.
In addition, by setting forth clear preauction and post-auction standards,
DOE believes that only the most serious
entities will seek to participate in each
reverse auction.
More particularly, section 452.2 of the
proposed rule defines key terms used in
the proposed regulations. Section 452.3
describes the proposed rule’s preauction eligibility standards, reverse
auction procedures, and post-auction
standards that must be met as a
condition of receiving production
incentive awards. Section 452.4 sets
forth proposed terms of and limitations
on the incentive production awards that
will be issued under the program.
B. Definitions
Section 942 of EPAct 2005 defines
‘‘cellulosic biofuels’’ as ‘‘any fuel that is
produced from cellulosic feedstocks.’’
42 U.S.C. 16251(b)(1). Because the
incentives authorized by section 942 are
based on a gallon measure, DOE
proposes in section 452.2 of the
regulations to refine the statutory
definition of ‘‘cellulosic biofuel’’ by
requiring the production of a liquid fuel.
Additionally, the proposed rule would
define ‘‘cellulosic feedstock’’ as any
lignocellulosic feedstock as so defined
by EPAct, section 932(a)(2). This serves
to make the proposed rule consistent
with and complementary to the
Department’s existing Bioenergy
Program under section 932 of EPAct and
supports the Renewable Fuels Standard
for biofuels originally in EPAct 2005,
section 1501, which was enhanced by
the Energy Independence and Security
Act of 2007.
As explained above, the goals of
section 942 include the delivery of the
first one billion gallons of annual
cellulosic biofuel production by 2015
and establishment of a biofuels industry
after 2015 that is cost competitive with
gasoline and diesel. In addition, section
942(c)(4)(C) requires that, as a condition
of receiving an award, successful
bidders must enter into an agreement
with the Secretary to begin production
of cellulosic biofuels not later than three
years after the date of the reverse
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:42 Dec 22, 2008
Jkt 217001
auction in which they participated.
Taking the aforementioned goals
together with the contractual
requirement of section 942(c)(4)(C), DOE
proposes to require successful bidders
to commit to production of a
commercially significant quantity
within three years of the reverse auction
in which they submitted their
successful bid. This requirement is
necessary if the Nation is to be able to
achieve delivery of the first one billion
gallons of annual cellulosic biofuel
production by 2015 and the
establishment of a commercially viable
cellulosic biofuels production capability
after 2015. Accordingly, ‘‘Commercially
Significant Quantity’’ is defined in the
proposed rule as 10 million or greater
gallons of cellulosic biofuels produced
in one year. This volume is an estimate
of the volume necessary to operate a
commercial scale refinery at
approximately 60 percent of nameplate
capacity; it is a level adequate to make
such a facility commercially viable and
is based on the size (15 to 20 million
gallons per year) of commercial scale
corn ethanol biorefineries when they
were first commercialized. See, Funding
Opportunity Announcement (FOA) DE–
PS36–06GO96016, ‘‘Commercial
Demonstration of an Integrated
Biorefinery System for Production of
Liquid Transportation Biofuels,
Biobased Chemicals, Substitutes for
Petroleum-based Feedstocks and
Products, and Biomass-based Heat/
Power.’’
Two other proposed definitions
similarly reflect DOE’s intent to assure
that the goals of section 942 are
achieved. First, ‘‘eligible biofuels
producer’’ is defined as a business
association, including but not limited to
a sole proprietorship, partnership, joint
venture, corporation, or other business
entity that owns and operates, or plans
to own and operate, an eligible
cellulosic biofuels production facility
and that meets all other eligibility
requirements that are conditions on the
receipt of production incentives under
this part. These eligibility requirements
are discussed in Section II.C.
Secondly, DOE proposes to define the
term ‘‘eligible cellulosic biofuels
production facility’’ as a facility that: (1)
Is or will be located in the United States
(including U.S. territories and
possessions); (2) meets or will meet all
applicable Federal and State permitting
requirements; and (3) meets any
financial criteria established by the
Secretary.
DOE encourages interested persons to
submit comments on the above
definitions and to make
recommendations regarding other terms
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that may warrant definition in the final
rule.
C. Reverse Auction Procedures and
Eligibility Requirements
Solicitations. Under the proposed
rule, the reverse auction process
commences with DOE’s issuance of a
solicitation. DOE proposes to issue the
solicitation by publication in the
Federal Register and by posting the
solicitation on its Web site at https://
www.eere.energy.gov no later than 60
days before the reverse auction. The
solicitation would invite interested
persons and businesses to file eligibility
submissions, as described herein, and
set forth the terms on which bids will
be accepted.
Eligibility. As discussed above, the
proposed rule includes both pre-auction
and post-auction eligibility
requirements intended to ensure that
the goals of section 942 are met. The
result is a three-step eligibility process.
First, the proposed rule would require
entities seeking to participate in a
reverse auction to make a pre-auction
eligibility submission that includes an
implementation plan demonstrating at a
minimum that they own and operate, or
plan to own and operate, an eligible
cellulosic biofuels production facility;
identifies the site or proposed site for
the facility; identifies one or more
proposed sources of financing for the
construction or expansion of the facility;
and provides any other additional
information specified in the applicable
solicitation. The proposed rule would
require the pre-auction eligibility
submission, including the
implementation plan, at a time to be
specified in the solicitation prior to the
reverse auction.
Second, the proposed rule would
require that, within one year of a reverse
auction, the successful bidder(s) submit
a progress report. The progress report
must demonstrate that the successful
bidder has acquired the site where its
proposed eligible cellulosic biofuels
production facility will be located; it
has obtained secure financing
commitments for the facility’s
construction or expansion thereof; a
licensed construction/design firm has
entered into a written engineering,
procurement, and construction (EPC)
agreement for design and construction
of the facility or facility expansion; and
the EPC agreement provides for
completion of the facility or facility
expansion such that production
operations at the facility are likely to be
completed in order to commence
production of commercially significant
quantities within three years of the date
of the reverse auction.
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Third, as a condition of receiving the
award, the proposed rule would require
the successful bidder, within 90 days
after the reverse auction, to enter into an
agreement with the Secretary to begin
production of commercially significant
quantities of cellulosic biofuel in an
eligible cellulosic biofuels production
facility within three years of the date of
the reverse auction in which it made a
successful bid. The successful bidder
must fulfill the terms of its agreement or
else lose the award.
Upon meeting the above three
eligibility requirements on a timely
basis, including the timely
commencement of production in
commercially significant quantities, the
successful bidder will begin to receive
production incentives on a volumetric
basis, as per the terms of its bid. DOE
believes that these three eligibility
requirements are necessary in order to
make meaningful progress toward the
goals of section 942 and to meet the
requirements of a production agreement
with the Secretary, entered into
pursuant to section 942(c)(4)(C) of
EPAct 2005.
Notification of Eligibility Status. The
proposed rule provides that all parties
who make pre-auction eligibility
submissions will be notified by DOE of
their eligibility status no later than 15
days before the relevant reverse auction.
Similarly, all successful bidders will be
duly notified of the acceptability of their
progress reports and contract
submissions in the second and third
steps of eligibility determinations
required under the proposed rule.
Bidding Procedures. The proposed
rule provides that following DOE’s
review of pre-auction eligibility
submissions and notifications of preauction eligibility status, DOE will
conduct an electronic reverse auction
through a limited duration single bid
auction process open only to eligible
biofuels producers. The proposed rule
would require bids to be submitted
electronically to a Web site specified in
the solicitation. The ‘‘open window’’
period for bid submissions would
consist of a single continuous,
minimum four-hour period for each
auction. Eligible biofuels producers
would submit their electronic bids for
production incentives, as specified in
DOE’s regulations and the relevant
solicitation. Only electronic bids
received from pre-auction eligible
biofuels producers during the open
window period would be accepted. The
proposed rule would require bids to
specify a desired level of production
incentive on a per gallon basis and an
estimated annual production amount in
gallons.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:42 Dec 22, 2008
Jkt 217001
Bid Evaluation and Incentive Awards
Selection and Notification. The
proposed rule provides that DOE will
review the bids received during the
open window period and, within 45
days following the close of the open
window for submission of bids,
announce on its Web site and by direct
mail the names of the successful bidders
and the terms of their bids. As required
by section 942(c)(4)(A)(iii) of EPAct
2005, the proposed rule states that DOE
will issue awards for the bid production
amounts beginning with the bidder that
submitted the bid for the lowest level of
production incentive on a per gallon
basis.
DOE encourages comments and
recommendations regarding the
advisability of using the abovedescribed electronic single bidding
process or, alternatively, whether the
reverse auction would be improved by
use of an open iterative process
allowing eligible entities to submit
multiple bids in real-time during the
open window period of the live auction.
In particular, DOE is interested in
comments as to whether a transparent
iterative process, where several rounds
of bids are posted, would tend to
increase economic efficiency by driving
down the production incentives to a
market-clearing level. DOE also invites
comments regarding the optimum
duration of the open window period for
bidding.
Statutory Priorities. Section 942(e) of
EPAct 2005 requires the Secretary to
give award priority to projects that: ‘‘(1)
Demonstrate outstanding potential for
local and regional economic
development; (2) include agricultural
producers or cooperatives of agricultural
producers as equity partners in the
ventures; and (3) have a strategic
agreement in place to fairly reward
feedstock suppliers.’’ 42 U.S.C.
16251(e).
In order to implement this statutory
priority scheme in a manner that also
complies with the statutory requirement
to issue awards beginning with the
eligible entity that submits a bid for
lowest level of production incentive,
DOE proposes to use the priorities in
section 942(e) as a tie-breaker device.
Specifically, the proposed rule provides
in section 452.5(c)(3) that in the event
of a tie among the lowest bids,
preference will be given to the lowest
tied bidder based on DOE’s evaluation
of the extent to which of the tied bids
best meets one or more of the three
statutory priority standards. In the event
more than one lowest tied bid is found
to meet the priority standards to an
equal extent, section 452.5(c)(4) of the
proposed rule states that the award will
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78665
be distributed equally on a per capita
basis among such bidders.
For example, assume the available
funds for section 942 incentive awards
pursuant to congressional
appropriations under a solicitation and
reverse auction are $2,500,000; assume
further that there are two pre-qualified
lowest bidders, both of which are
agricultural producers. Assume further
that these two bidders submitted
identical low bids of $.65 per gallon and
the two bidders meet the statutory
preference standards to the same extent;
but one of these bidders (Bidder A)
sought an incentive for 10,000,000
gallons of biofuels production, while the
other (Bidder B) sought an incentive for
5,000,000 gallons of biofuels
production. The total production
incentive sought under these
circumstances for Bidder A is
$6,500,000 and the total production
incentive sought by Bidder B is
$3,250,000. Under these assumed facts,
DOE intends to make half of the
appropriated funds ($1,250,000)
available for awards to each of the two
lowest successful bidders. Bidder A
would not receive a greater award than
Bidder B even though its bid was based
on double the production of Bidder B.
This approach would distribute
incentives on the widest scale among
lowest successful bidders that qualify
for statutory preferences.
DOE invites comments on its
proposed method for determining the
successful bid. DOE is particularly
interested in knowing whether it would
be advisable to apply the statutory
priorities not as a tie breaker device but
as a pre-qualification preference or
evaluation point preference. With
respect to the tie breaker approach
proposed in this NOPR, DOE is
interested in receiving comments from
the public about the proposed prorating
of awards among successful bids that
meet the statutory priority standards.
DOE invites public comment on
whether it would be preferable for DOE
to make a determination of which
bidder among those who have tied best
meets the statutory priority standards,
thereby obviating the need to prorate
awards. DOE is concerned that the
auction process could be ‘‘gamed,’’ i.e.,
there is a potential for undisclosed
business or investment interests to
‘‘front’’ a bidder that qualifies for a
statutory priority to the disadvantage of
other bidders that do not qualify for a
statutory priority. DOE encourages
parties to comment on the likelihood of
such abuses and how to best prevent
them.
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
78666
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
D. Incentive Award Terms and
Limitations
1. Amount of Incentive. As required
by section 942(c)(4)(B) of EPAct 2005
and subject to appropriations, the
proposed rule states that an auction
participant selected to receive an award
shall receive the amount of the
production incentive on the per gallon
basis requested in the auction
solicitation for each gallon produced
and sold by the entity during the first
six years of operation.
2. Failure to Commence Production.
As discussed above, the proposed rule
provides in section 452.4(d) that a
successful bidder must enter into an
agreement with DOE under which the
successful bidder agrees to begin
production of cellulosic biofuels not
later than three years after the date of
the reverse auction in which it
submitted a successful bid. This is a
statutory requirement contained in
section 942(c)(4)(C) of EPAct 2005.
Section 452.6(b) of the proposed rule
provides that failure of a successful
bidder to fulfill the terms of this
agreement by actually commencing
production of commercially significant
quantities of cellulosic biofuels within
three years after the date of the auction
shall result in the immediate revocation
of the award. DOE invites comments
and recommendations concerning the
appropriateness of this remedy.
3. Limitations. Section 942(d) of
EPAct 2005 establishes five types of
limitations on the cellulosic biofuels
production incentives, including: (1) A
per gallon amount determined by the
Secretary may be awarded during the
first four years of the program; (2) a
declining per gallon cap on the
incentives awarded over the remaining
lifetime of the program, to be
established by the Secretary, so that
cellulosic biofuels produced after the
first year of annual cellulosic biofuels
production in the United States in
excess of one billion gallons are cost
competitive with gasoline and diesel; (3)
not more than 25 percent of the funds
committed within each reverse auction
may be awarded to any one project; (4)
not more than $100 million may be
awarded in any one year; and (5) not
more than $1 billion may be awarded
over the lifetime of the program.
The proposed rule would implement
the foregoing limitations at section
452.6(c). In particular, the proposed rule
provides that the first of the above
limitations shall be $1.00 per gallon
during the first four years of the
program. For these purposes, the
program would be deemed to have
commenced on the date that the first
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:42 Dec 22, 2008
Jkt 217001
solicitation for a reverse auction is
issued. DOE’s intent is to create an
incentive for early commencement of
operations that yield commercially
significant production volumes in the
near term. Because the second
limitation described above (the
declining per gallon cap) will result in
lower incentive awards in years after the
first four years of the program, an earlier
program commencement date should
hasten the period during which the
higher limitation ceiling will be
available. However, DOE solicits
comments and recommendations
regarding its selection of the program
commencement date.
4. Transferability of Awards. The
proposed rule would permit awards to
be transferred to successor entities that
meet all eligibility requirements for the
program, as set forth in the proposed
rule, and enter into an agreement with
the Secretary to commence production
within three years of the date of the
reverse auction. DOE encourages
interested persons to submit comments
and recommendations regarding these
proposed transferability restrictions. In
addition, DOE requests comments
regarding any other transfer-related
issues. For example, should awards
(including the right to the awards and
the underlying obligation to commence
production within three years of the
auction) be transferable at all? If the
awards should be transferable, should
the awards be transferable prior to the
time that production commences?
Should the awards be transferable to
entities not engaged in the production of
cellulosic biofuels, i.e., should DOE
permit the creation of a securitized
interest and secondary market in
production incentive awards, or should
DOE (as proposed in this NOPR) only
permit entities actually engaged in
cellulosic ethanol production to receive
the awards?
III. Regulatory Review
A. Executive Order 12866
Today’s proposed rule has been
determined to be a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866,
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’ 58
FR 51735 (October 4, 1993).
Accordingly, this action was subject to
review under that Executive Order by
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs of the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB).
B. National Environmental Policy Act
DOE has determined that this
proposed rule is covered under the
Categorical Exclusion found in the
DOE’s National Environmental Policy
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Act (NEPA) regulations at paragraph A6
of Appendix A to Subpart D, 10 CFR
Part 1021, which applies to rulemakings
that are strictly procedural. DOE notes
that the procedures proposed in this
NOPR do not afford DOE discretion to
determine whether or how a facility will
be constructed or operated. DOE’s
prescribed role under section 942, that
is, awarding production incentives to
the lowest bidder in a reverse auction,
is strictly procedural. Accordingly,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required for the proposed rule or for
an award that DOE gives or proposes to
give to a successful bidder. If DOE
subsequently proposes to take any
additional actions with respect to
successful bidders, separate from the
award of funds under section 942 of
EPAct 2005, DOE will separately
evaluate the need for NEPA review of
those new proposed actions.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires preparation
of an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis for any rule that by law must
be proposed for public comment, unless
the agency certifies that the rule, if
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. As required by
Executive Order 13272, ‘‘Proper
Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking,’’ 67 FR 53461
(August 16, 2002), DOE published
procedures and policies on February 19,
2003, to ensure that the potential
impacts of its rules on small entities are
properly considered during the
rulemaking process (68 FR 7990). DOE
has made its procedures and policies
available on the Office of General
Counsel’s Web site: https://
www.gc.doe.gov.
DOE has reviewed today’s proposed
rule under the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act and the
procedures and policies published on
February 19, 2003. The proposed rule
will only affect biofuels producers if
they choose to participate in the reverse
auction. Moreover, the proposed rule
would provide an economic benefit
without imposing any regulatory
requirements on producers of cellulosic
biofuels. On the basis of the foregoing,
DOE certifies that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Accordingly, DOE has not
prepared a regulatory flexibility analysis
for this rulemaking. This certification
and supporting statement of factual
basis will be provided to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Business Administration pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b).
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4) generally
requires Federal agencies to examine
closely the impacts of regulatory actions
on State, local, and tribal governments.
Subsection 101(5) of title I of that law
defines a Federal intergovernmental
mandate to include any regulation that
would impose upon State, local, or
tribal governments an enforceable duty,
except a condition of Federal assistance
or a duty arising from participating in a
voluntary federal program. Title II of
that law requires each Federal agency to
assess the effects of Federal regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or to the
private sector, other than to the extent
such actions merely incorporate
requirements specifically set forth in a
statute. Section 202 of that title requires
a Federal agency to perform a detailed
assessment of the anticipated costs and
benefits of any rule that includes a
Federal mandate which may result in
costs to State, local, or tribal
governments, or to the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year
(adjusted annually for inflation). 2
U.S.C. 1532(a) and (b). Section 204 of
that title requires each agency that
proposes a rule containing a significant
Federal intergovernmental mandate to
develop an effective process for
obtaining meaningful and timely input
from elected officers of State, local, and
tribal governments. 2 U.S.C. 1534.
This proposed rule would not impose
a Federal mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or on the private
sector. Accordingly, no assessment or
analysis is required under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Proposed section 452.4(a) provides
that entities that intend to participate in
a reverse auction must file a pre-auction
eligibility submission. The pre-auction
eligibility submission must contain
certain information, including an
implementation plan, as described
above. This information will be used by
DOE to determine if an entity that files
a pre-auction eligibility submission will
be accepted to participate in the reverse
auction.
In addition, proposed section 452.4(c)
provides that a bidder must submit a
progress report. The progress report
must contain the additional information
described above. DOE will use this
information to evaluate the bidder’s
progress in the production of cellulosic
biofuels. DOE has submitted this
collection of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for approval
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and
the procedures implementing that Act, 5
CFR 1320.1 et seq.
DOE estimates that the annual
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information will be 30
hours per year (10 bidders × 3 hours) at
a total annual cost of $2250 (10 bidders
× $225 per auction). Burden means the
total time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate,
maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a federal agency.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Interested parties are invited to
submit comments to OMB addressed to:
Department of Energy Desk Officer,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, OMB, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503. Persons
submitting comments to OMB also are
requested to send a copy to the DOE
contact person at the address given in
the ADDRESSES section of this notice.
OMB is particularly interested in
comments on (1) The necessity of the
proposed information collection
requirements, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of DOE’s estimates of
the burden; (3) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be maintained; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
requirements on respondents.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:42 Dec 22, 2008
Jkt 217001
F. Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105–277) requires
Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any
proposed rule that may affect family
wellbeing. The proposed rule would not
have any impact on the autonomy or
integrity of the family as an institution.
Accordingly, DOE has concluded that it
is not necessary to prepare a Family
Policymaking Assessment.
G. Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’
64 FR 43255 (August 4, 1999) imposes
certain requirements on agencies
formulating and implementing policies
or regulations that preempt State law or
that have federalism implications.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78667
Agencies are required to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority
supporting any action that would limit
the policymaking discretion of the
States and carefully assess the necessity
for such actions. DOE has examined this
proposed rule and has determined that
it would not preempt State law and
would not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. No further
action is required by Executive Order
13132.
H. Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing
regulations and the promulgation of
new regulations, section 3(a) of
Executive Order 12988, ‘‘Civil Justice
Reform,’’ 61 FR 4729 (February 7, 1996),
imposes on Executive agencies the
general duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; and
(3) provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct rather than a general
standard and promote simplification
and burden reduction. With regard to
the review required by section 3(a),
section 3(b) of Executive Order 12988
specifically requires that Executive
agencies make every reasonable effort to
ensure that the regulation: (1) Clearly
specifies the preemptive effect, if any;
(2) clearly specifies any effect on
existing Federal law or regulation; (3)
provides a clear legal standard for
affected conduct while promoting
simplification and burden reduction; (4)
specifies the retroactive effect, if any; (5)
adequately defines key terms; and (6)
addresses other important issues
affecting clarity and general
draftsmanship under any guidelines
issued by the Attorney General. Section
3(c) of Executive Order 12988 requires
Executive agencies to review regulations
in light of applicable standards in
section 3(a) and section 3(b) to
determine whether they are met or it is
unreasonable to meet one or more of
them. DOE has completed the required
review and determined that, to the
extent permitted by law, the proposed
rule meets the relevant standards of
Executive Order 12988.
I. Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 2001
The Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001
(44 U.S.C. 3516 note) provides for
agencies to review most disseminations
of information to the public under
guidelines established by each agency
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
78668
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pursuant to general guidelines issued by
OMB.
OMB’s guidelines were published at
67 FR 8452 (February 22, 2002), and
DOE’s guidelines were published at 67
FR 62446 (October 7, 2002). DOE has
reviewed today’s proposed rule under
the OMB and DOE guidelines and has
concluded that it is consistent with
applicable policies in those guidelines.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
11, 2008.
Steven G. Chalk,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
J. Executive Order 13211
PART 452—PRODUCTION INCENTIVES
FOR CELLULOSIC BIOFUELS
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use,’’ 66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001) requires Federal agencies to
prepare and submit to OMB, a
Statement of Energy Effects for any
proposed significant energy action. A
‘‘significant energy action’’ is defined as
any action by an agency that
promulgated or is expected to lead to
promulgation of a final rule, and that:
(1) Is a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866, or any
successor order; and (2) is likely to have
a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy, or
(3) is designated by the Administrator of
OIRA as a significant energy action. For
any proposed significant energy action,
the agency must give a detailed
statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use
should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the
action and their expected benefits on
energy supply, distribution, and use.
Today’s regulatory action would not
have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy
and is therefore not a significant energy
action. Accordingly, DOE has not
prepared a Statement of Energy Effects.
K. Consultation
Pursuant to section 942(c)(1) of EPAct
2005, DOE will consult with the
Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary
of Defense, and the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency prior
to issuing a final rule.
IV. Approval of the Office of the
Secretary
The issuance of this proposed rule has
been approved by the Office of the
Secretary.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 452
Fuel, Grant programs, Recordkeeping
and reporting requirements, Renewable
energy.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:10 Dec 22, 2008
Jkt 217001
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, DOE proposes to amend
chapter II of title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations by adding a new
part 452 as set forth below:
Sec.
452.1 Purpose and scope.
452.2 Definitions.
452.3 Solicitations.
452.4 Eligibility requirements.
452.5 Bidding procedures.
452.6 Incentive award terms and
limitations.
§ 452.3
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.; 42 U.S.C.
16251.
§ 452.1
Purpose and scope.
(a) This part sets forth the standards,
policies, and procedures that the
Department of Energy uses for receiving,
evaluating, and awarding bids in reverse
auctions of production incentive
payments for cellulosic biofuels under
section 942 of the Energy Policy Act of
2005 (42 U.S.C. 16251).
(b) Part 1024 of chapter X of title 10
of the Code of Federal Regulations shall
not apply to actions taken under this
part.
§ 452.2
Definitions.
Cellulosic biofuels means any liquid
fuel produced from cellulosic
feedstocks.
Cellulosic feedstock means any
lignocellulosic feedstock as defined by
EPAct 2005, section 932(a)(2).
Commercially significant quantity
means 10 million gallons or more of
cellulosic biofuels produced in one
year.
DOE means the U.S. Department of
Energy.
Eligible biofuels producer means a
business association, including but not
limited to a sole proprietorship,
partnership, joint venture, corporation,
or other business entity that owns and
operates, or plans to own and operate,
an eligible cellulosic biofuels
production facility and that meets all
other eligibility requirements that are
conditions on the receipt of production
incentives under this part.
Eligible cellulosic biofuels production
facility means a facility—
(1) Located in the United States
(including U.S. territories and
possessions);
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(2) Which meets all applicable
Federal and State permitting
requirements; and
(3) Meets any financial criteria
established by the Secretary.
EPAct 2005 means the Energy Policy
Act of 2005, Public Law 109–58 (August
8, 2005).
Open window means the period
during each reverse auction, as specified
in an associated solicitation, during
which DOE accepts bids for production
incentives under this part.
Secretary means the Secretary of
Energy.
Solicitations.
The reverse auction process
commences with the issuance of a
solicitation by DOE. DOE will publish a
solicitation in the Federal Register and
shall post the solicitation on its Web site
at https://www.eere.energy.gov no later
than 60 days before the bidding in a
reverse auction under this part
commences. The solicitation shall:
(a) Invite interested persons and
businesses to submit pre-qualification
statements;
(b) Set forth the terms on which bids
will be accepted;
(c) Specify the open window for
bidding; and
(d) Specify the date by which
successful bidders will be required to
file pre-auction eligibility submissions.
§ 452.4
Eligibility requirements.
(a) Pre-auction eligibility submissions.
(1) Entities that intend to participate in
a reverse auction, within the time
period stated in the relevant solicitation,
must file a pre-auction eligibility
submission that provides all
information requested in the applicable
solicitation to which it is responding,
including an implementation plan.
(2) Each pre-auction eligibility
submission’s implementation plan
must, at a minimum:
(i) Demonstrate that the filing party
owns and operates or plans to own and
operate an eligible cellulosic biofuels
production facility;
(ii) Identify the site or proposed site
for the filing party’s eligible cellulosic
biofuels production facility; and
(iii) Identify one or more proposed
sources of financing for the construction
or expansion of the filing party’s eligible
cellulosic biofuels production facility.
(b) Notification of pre-auction
eligibility status. DOE shall notify each
entity that files a pre-auction eligibility
submission of its acceptance or rejection
no later than 15 days before the reverse
auction for which the submission was
made. A DOE decision constitutes final
agency action and is conclusive.
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(c) Progress reports. Within one year
after the reverse auction in which a
bidder successfully competed, the
bidder must submit a progress report
that includes all additional information
required by the solicitation in which the
bidder submitted a successful bid and
which demonstrates that the bidder has:
(1) Acquired the site where its
proposed eligible cellulosic biofuels
production facility is or will be located;
(2) Obtained secure financing
commitments for the plant or expansion
thereof, as necessary to produce
cellulosic biofuels; and
(3) Entered into a written engineering,
procurement, and construction (EPC)
contract for design and construction of
the eligible cellulosic biofuels
production facility; such EPC contract
must provide for completion of
construction of the eligible cellulosic
biofuels production facility such that
operations at the plant or plant
expansion will commence within three
years of the reverse auction in which the
bidder successfully competed.
(d) Production agreement. Within 90
days after submission of its progress
report under paragraph (c) of this
section, the successful bidder must
enter into an agreement with DOE
which requires the bidder to begin
production of commercially significant
quantities of cellulosic biofuels, at the
plant or plant expansion that was the
subject of the relevant bid, not later than
three years from the date of the
acceptance of the successful bid.
(e) Confirmation of continuing
eligibility. After receiving the progress
report under paragraph (c) of this
section and upon confirmation by DOE
that the successful bidder has entered
into a production agreement with DOE,
as described in paragraph (d) of this
section, DOE will confirm to the bidder
that it continues to meet the eligibility
requirements of this part.
(f) Contractual condition on eligibility.
(1) As a condition of the receipt of an
award under this part, a successful
bidder in a reverse auction under this
part must demonstrate that it has
fulfilled the terms of its production
agreement entered into with DOE
pursuant to paragraph (d) of this
section.
(2) As a condition of continuing to
receive production incentive payments
under this part, a bidder that has
entered into a production agreement
with DOE must annually submit to DOE,
by a commercially reasonable date
specified by DOE, verification of the
bidder’s production volumes for the
prior calendar year. Within 90 days of
the submission of such verification,
DOE shall notify the successful bidder
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:42 Dec 22, 2008
Jkt 217001
whether the bidder has fulfilled the
terms of the production agreement and
shall make payment of any production
incentive awards then outstanding for
the one year period covered by the
verified data submission.
§ 452.5
Bidding procedures.
DOE shall conduct an electronic
reverse auction through a limited
duration single bid per producer auction
process open only to pre-auction
eligible cellulosic biofuels producers.
The following procedures shall be used:
(a) DOE shall accept only electronic
bids received from pre-auction eligible
cellulosic biofuels producers during the
open window established in the
solicitation. The open window shall
consist of a single continuous period of
at least four hours for each auction.
(b) Bids must specify:
(1) A desired level of production
incentive on a per gallon basis.
(2) An estimated annual production
amount in gallons.
(3) All bids will be confidential until
45 days after the close of the window for
submission of bids for the reverse
auction.
(c) Bid evaluation and incentive
awards selection.
(1) After DOE evaluates the bids
received during the open window, it
shall, within 45 days following the close
of the open window for submission of
bids for the reverse auction, announce
on DOE’s Web site and by direct mail
the names of the successful bidders and
the terms of their bids.
(2) DOE shall issue awards for the bid
production amounts beginning with the
bidder that submitted the bid for the
lowest level of production incentive on
a per gallon basis.
(3) In the event of a tie among the
lowest bids, preference will be given to
the lowest tied bidder based on DOE’s
evaluation of the extent to which the
tied bids meet the following criteria:
(i) Demonstrates outstanding potential
for local and regional economic
development;
(ii) Includes agricultural producers or
cooperatives of agricultural producers as
equity partners in the ventures; and
(iii) Has a strategic agreement in place
to fairly reward feedstock suppliers.
(4) In the event more than one lowest
tied bid equally meets the standards in
paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the
award will be distributed equally on a
per capita basis among those lowest tied
bidders meeting the standards.
§ 452.6 Incentive award terms and
limitations.
(a) Amount of incentive. Subject to the
availability of appropriated funds and
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78669
the limitations in paragraph (c) of this
section, an eligible cellulosic biofuels
producer selected to receive an award
shall receive the amount of the
production incentive on the per gallon
basis requested in the auction
solicitation for each gallon produced
and sold by the entity during the first
six years of operation of its eligible
cellulosic biofuels production facility.
(b) Failure to commence production.
Failure by an eligible cellulosic biofuels
producer that made a successful bid to
commence production of cellulosic
biofuels, at the eligible cellulosic
biofuels production facility that was the
subject of the successful bid, by the end
of the third year after the close of
submission of the open window of bids
for the reverse auction in which it
submitted a successful bid, shall result
in immediate revocation of DOE’s award
to that producer.
(c) Incentive award limitations. The
following limits shall apply to awards of
cellulosic biofuels production
incentives under this part:
(1) During the first four years after the
commencement of the program, the
incentive shall be limited to $1.00 per
gallon. For purposes of this limitation,
the program shall be deemed to have
commenced on the date that the first
solicitation for a reverse auction is
issued;
(2) A per gallon cap over the
remaining lifetime of the program of
$.95 per gallon provided that—
(i) This cap shall be lowered by $.05
each year commencing the first year
after annual cellulosic biofuels
production in the United States exceeds
one billion gallons;
(ii) Not more than 25 percent of the
funds committed within each reverse
auction shall be awarded to any single
project;
(iii) Not more than $100 million in
production incentives shall be awarded
in any one calendar year; and
(iv) Not more than $1 billion in
production incentives shall be awarded
over the lifetime of the program.
(d) Participation in subsequent
auctions. A successful bidder in a
reverse auction under this part may
participate in subsequent reverse
auctions if the incentives sought will
assist the addition of plant production
capacity for the eligible cellulosic
biofuels production facility associated
with its previously successful bid.
(e) Transferability of awards. A
production incentive award under this
part may be transferred to a successor
entity that meets all eligibility
requirements of this part, including
execution of an agreement with DOE to
commence production of cellulosic
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
78670
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 23, 2008 / Proposed Rules
biofuels in commercially significant
quantities not later than three years of
the date that bidding closes on the
reverse auction in which the
predecessor entity submitted a
successful bid.
[FR Doc. E8–30500 Filed 12–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–1327; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–161–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A318, A319, A320, and A321 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
An A320 aircraft experienced an event
where it was not possible to open the
reinforced cockpit door, even after power had
been removed from the aircraft. Investigation
has identified that the cockpit door latch/
striker assembly may have overheated,
causing permanent internal damage prior to
being electrically isolated by the internal
thermal fuse. This condition, in case of a
rapid decompression in the cockpit, would
prevent the necessary unlocking/opening of
the door, which may lead to failure of the
airplane structure.
*
*
*
*
*
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 22, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:42 Dec 22, 2008
Jkt 217001
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office—EAS, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51;
e-mail: account.airwortheas@airbus.com; Internet https://
www.airbus.com. You may review
copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221
or 425–227–1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Dulin, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–2141; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2008–1327; Directorate Identifier
2008–NM–161–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2008–0151,
dated August 5, 2008 (referred to after
this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
An A320 aircraft experienced an event
where it was not possible to open the
reinforced cockpit door, even after power had
been removed from the aircraft. Investigation
has identified that the cockpit door latch/
striker assembly may have overheated,
causing permanent internal damage prior to
being electrically isolated by the internal
thermal fuse. This condition, in case of a
rapid decompression in the cockpit, would
prevent the necessary unlocking/opening of
the door, which may lead to failure of the
airplane structure.
To prevent this, an improved strike
package/door bolting system, including a
Polymer Positive Temperature Coefficient
(PPTC) element (overheat protection) was
introduced by Airbus Modification 35219 in
production and modification 35218 (Service
Bulletin A320–25–1444) in-service. The
PPTC is a resettable thermistor and is
installed on the frame of the electricallyoperated cockpit door latch/striker assembly.
The in-service implementation of this
modification was originally managed by an
Airbus campaign but the rate of installation
by operators has not met the expected
timescales, making mandatory action
necessary to address this.
For the reasons described above, this AD
requires the installation of improved cockpit
door latch/striker assemblies.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin
A320–25–1444, Revision 02, dated
August 1, 2006. The actions described
in this service information are intended
to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 247 (Tuesday, December 23, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 78663-78670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-30500]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 452
RIN 1904-AB73
Production Incentives for Cellulosic Biofuels; Reverse Auction
Procedures and Standards
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S.
Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) and opportunity for
comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) today publishes a proposed rule
to establish the procedures and standards for reverse auctions of
production incentives for cellulosic biofuels pursuant to section 942
of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005).
DATES: Public comment on this proposed rule will be accepted until
January 22, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN 1904-AB73, by any
of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:/www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
2. E-mail to EPAct942@go.doe.gov. Include RIN 1904-AB73 in the
subject line of the e-mail. Please include the full body of your
comments in the text of the message or as an attachment.
3. Mail: Address written comments to James Spaeth, U.S. Department
of Energy, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80401.
If you submit information that you believe to be exempt by law from
public disclosure, you should submit one complete copy, as well as one
copy from which the information claimed to be exempt by law from public
disclosure has been deleted. DOE is responsible for the final
determination with regard to disclosure or nondisclosure of the
information and for treating it accordingly under the DOE Freedom of
Information Act regulations at 10 CFR 1004.11.
Due to potential delays in DOE's receipt and processing of mail
sent through the U.S. Postal Service, we encourage respondents to
submit comments electronically to ensure timely receipt.
You may obtain copies of comments submitted in response to this
notice of proposed rulemaking by contacting Mr. James Spaeth.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James Spaeth, U.S. Department of
Energy, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80401; (303) 275-4771;
jim.spaeth@go.doe.gov; or Mr. Edward Myers, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. Department of Energy, Mailstop GC-72, Room 6B-256, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585; (202) 586-3397 or
edward.myers@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Discussion of Proposed Rule
III. Regulatory Review
IV. Approval by the Office of the Secretary
I. Background
Section 942 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law No. 109-58
(August 8, 2005), requires the Secretary of Energy (Secretary), in
consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of
Defense, and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency,
to establish an incentive program for the production of cellulosic
biofuels and to implement that program by means of a ``reverse
auction.'' Section 942(a) states that the purposes of the program are
to: ``(1) Accelerate deployment and commercialization of biofuels; (2)
deliver the first 1 billion gallons of annual cellulosic biofuel
production by 2015; (3) ensure biofuels produced after 2015 are cost
competitive with gasoline and diesel; and (4) ensure that small
feedstock producers and rural small businesses are full participants in
the development of the cellulosic biofuels industry.'' In order to
achieve these purposes, the Secretary is to award production incentives
on a per gallon basis to eligible entities by means of a reverse
auction. Under section 942, the first reverse auction is required
annually until the earlier of the first year that annual production of
cellulosic biofuels in the United States reaches 1 billion gallons or
10 years after enactment of EPAct 2005, i.e., August 8, 2015.
However, pursuant to section 202 of the Energy Independence and
Security Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-140) (EISA), the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency is required to issue regulations that
implement certain Renewable Fuel Standards, including regulations to
ensure that transportation fuel sold or introduced into commerce in the
United States (except in noncontiguous States or territories), on an
annual average basis, contains at least 1 billion gallons of cellulosic
biofuel by calendar year 2013. Consequently, if the Renewable Fuel
Standard for cellulosic biofuel under EISA is achieved, the last
reverse auction under section 942 of EPAct 2005 would occur in 2013.
II. Discussion of Proposed Rule
A. Overview
The proposed rule would establish procedures for the reverse
auction and standards for making production incentive awards. The
eligibility standards include both pre-auction requirements which must
be met prior to an entity's participation in a reverse auction under
section 942 and several post-auction standards which must be met as a
condition of receiving an award. The post-auction standards are
especially necessary if the Nation is to achieve the long-term goals of
section 942, including delivery of the first one billion gallons of
annual cellulosic biofuel production by 2015, and
[[Page 78664]]
establishment of a biofuels industry after 2015 that is cost
competitive with gasoline and diesel. The post-auction standards are
thus intended to ensure that successful bidders make real and
meaningful progress toward the production of cellulosic biofuels in
commercially significant quantities. DOE believes that as successive
auctions yield more and more production of cellulosic biofuels, the
Nation will move closer to achieving section 942's long-term national
goal of a commercially viable production capability after 2015. In
addition, by setting forth clear pre-auction and post-auction
standards, DOE believes that only the most serious entities will seek
to participate in each reverse auction.
More particularly, section 452.2 of the proposed rule defines key
terms used in the proposed regulations. Section 452.3 describes the
proposed rule's pre-auction eligibility standards, reverse auction
procedures, and post-auction standards that must be met as a condition
of receiving production incentive awards. Section 452.4 sets forth
proposed terms of and limitations on the incentive production awards
that will be issued under the program.
B. Definitions
Section 942 of EPAct 2005 defines ``cellulosic biofuels'' as ``any
fuel that is produced from cellulosic feedstocks.'' 42 U.S.C.
16251(b)(1). Because the incentives authorized by section 942 are based
on a gallon measure, DOE proposes in section 452.2 of the regulations
to refine the statutory definition of ``cellulosic biofuel'' by
requiring the production of a liquid fuel. Additionally, the proposed
rule would define ``cellulosic feedstock'' as any lignocellulosic
feedstock as so defined by EPAct, section 932(a)(2). This serves to
make the proposed rule consistent with and complementary to the
Department's existing Bioenergy Program under section 932 of EPAct and
supports the Renewable Fuels Standard for biofuels originally in EPAct
2005, section 1501, which was enhanced by the Energy Independence and
Security Act of 2007.
As explained above, the goals of section 942 include the delivery
of the first one billion gallons of annual cellulosic biofuel
production by 2015 and establishment of a biofuels industry after 2015
that is cost competitive with gasoline and diesel. In addition, section
942(c)(4)(C) requires that, as a condition of receiving an award,
successful bidders must enter into an agreement with the Secretary to
begin production of cellulosic biofuels not later than three years
after the date of the reverse auction in which they participated.
Taking the aforementioned goals together with the contractual
requirement of section 942(c)(4)(C), DOE proposes to require successful
bidders to commit to production of a commercially significant quantity
within three years of the reverse auction in which they submitted their
successful bid. This requirement is necessary if the Nation is to be
able to achieve delivery of the first one billion gallons of annual
cellulosic biofuel production by 2015 and the establishment of a
commercially viable cellulosic biofuels production capability after
2015. Accordingly, ``Commercially Significant Quantity'' is defined in
the proposed rule as 10 million or greater gallons of cellulosic
biofuels produced in one year. This volume is an estimate of the volume
necessary to operate a commercial scale refinery at approximately 60
percent of nameplate capacity; it is a level adequate to make such a
facility commercially viable and is based on the size (15 to 20 million
gallons per year) of commercial scale corn ethanol biorefineries when
they were first commercialized. See, Funding Opportunity Announcement
(FOA) DE-PS36-06GO96016, ``Commercial Demonstration of an Integrated
Biorefinery System for Production of Liquid Transportation Biofuels,
Biobased Chemicals, Substitutes for Petroleum-based Feedstocks and
Products, and Biomass-based Heat/Power.''
Two other proposed definitions similarly reflect DOE's intent to
assure that the goals of section 942 are achieved. First, ``eligible
biofuels producer'' is defined as a business association, including but
not limited to a sole proprietorship, partnership, joint venture,
corporation, or other business entity that owns and operates, or plans
to own and operate, an eligible cellulosic biofuels production facility
and that meets all other eligibility requirements that are conditions
on the receipt of production incentives under this part. These
eligibility requirements are discussed in Section II.C.
Secondly, DOE proposes to define the term ``eligible cellulosic
biofuels production facility'' as a facility that: (1) Is or will be
located in the United States (including U.S. territories and
possessions); (2) meets or will meet all applicable Federal and State
permitting requirements; and (3) meets any financial criteria
established by the Secretary.
DOE encourages interested persons to submit comments on the above
definitions and to make recommendations regarding other terms that may
warrant definition in the final rule.
C. Reverse Auction Procedures and Eligibility Requirements
Solicitations. Under the proposed rule, the reverse auction process
commences with DOE's issuance of a solicitation. DOE proposes to issue
the solicitation by publication in the Federal Register and by posting
the solicitation on its Web site at https://www.eere.energy.gov no later
than 60 days before the reverse auction. The solicitation would invite
interested persons and businesses to file eligibility submissions, as
described herein, and set forth the terms on which bids will be
accepted.
Eligibility. As discussed above, the proposed rule includes both
pre-auction and post-auction eligibility requirements intended to
ensure that the goals of section 942 are met. The result is a three-
step eligibility process. First, the proposed rule would require
entities seeking to participate in a reverse auction to make a pre-
auction eligibility submission that includes an implementation plan
demonstrating at a minimum that they own and operate, or plan to own
and operate, an eligible cellulosic biofuels production facility;
identifies the site or proposed site for the facility; identifies one
or more proposed sources of financing for the construction or expansion
of the facility; and provides any other additional information
specified in the applicable solicitation. The proposed rule would
require the pre-auction eligibility submission, including the
implementation plan, at a time to be specified in the solicitation
prior to the reverse auction.
Second, the proposed rule would require that, within one year of a
reverse auction, the successful bidder(s) submit a progress report. The
progress report must demonstrate that the successful bidder has
acquired the site where its proposed eligible cellulosic biofuels
production facility will be located; it has obtained secure financing
commitments for the facility's construction or expansion thereof; a
licensed construction/design firm has entered into a written
engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) agreement for design
and construction of the facility or facility expansion; and the EPC
agreement provides for completion of the facility or facility expansion
such that production operations at the facility are likely to be
completed in order to commence production of commercially significant
quantities within three years of the date of the reverse auction.
[[Page 78665]]
Third, as a condition of receiving the award, the proposed rule
would require the successful bidder, within 90 days after the reverse
auction, to enter into an agreement with the Secretary to begin
production of commercially significant quantities of cellulosic biofuel
in an eligible cellulosic biofuels production facility within three
years of the date of the reverse auction in which it made a successful
bid. The successful bidder must fulfill the terms of its agreement or
else lose the award.
Upon meeting the above three eligibility requirements on a timely
basis, including the timely commencement of production in commercially
significant quantities, the successful bidder will begin to receive
production incentives on a volumetric basis, as per the terms of its
bid. DOE believes that these three eligibility requirements are
necessary in order to make meaningful progress toward the goals of
section 942 and to meet the requirements of a production agreement with
the Secretary, entered into pursuant to section 942(c)(4)(C) of EPAct
2005.
Notification of Eligibility Status. The proposed rule provides that
all parties who make pre-auction eligibility submissions will be
notified by DOE of their eligibility status no later than 15 days
before the relevant reverse auction. Similarly, all successful bidders
will be duly notified of the acceptability of their progress reports
and contract submissions in the second and third steps of eligibility
determinations required under the proposed rule.
Bidding Procedures. The proposed rule provides that following DOE's
review of pre-auction eligibility submissions and notifications of pre-
auction eligibility status, DOE will conduct an electronic reverse
auction through a limited duration single bid auction process open only
to eligible biofuels producers. The proposed rule would require bids to
be submitted electronically to a Web site specified in the
solicitation. The ``open window'' period for bid submissions would
consist of a single continuous, minimum four-hour period for each
auction. Eligible biofuels producers would submit their electronic bids
for production incentives, as specified in DOE's regulations and the
relevant solicitation. Only electronic bids received from pre-auction
eligible biofuels producers during the open window period would be
accepted. The proposed rule would require bids to specify a desired
level of production incentive on a per gallon basis and an estimated
annual production amount in gallons.
Bid Evaluation and Incentive Awards Selection and Notification. The
proposed rule provides that DOE will review the bids received during
the open window period and, within 45 days following the close of the
open window for submission of bids, announce on its Web site and by
direct mail the names of the successful bidders and the terms of their
bids. As required by section 942(c)(4)(A)(iii) of EPAct 2005, the
proposed rule states that DOE will issue awards for the bid production
amounts beginning with the bidder that submitted the bid for the lowest
level of production incentive on a per gallon basis.
DOE encourages comments and recommendations regarding the
advisability of using the above-described electronic single bidding
process or, alternatively, whether the reverse auction would be
improved by use of an open iterative process allowing eligible entities
to submit multiple bids in real-time during the open window period of
the live auction. In particular, DOE is interested in comments as to
whether a transparent iterative process, where several rounds of bids
are posted, would tend to increase economic efficiency by driving down
the production incentives to a market-clearing level. DOE also invites
comments regarding the optimum duration of the open window period for
bidding.
Statutory Priorities. Section 942(e) of EPAct 2005 requires the
Secretary to give award priority to projects that: ``(1) Demonstrate
outstanding potential for local and regional economic development; (2)
include agricultural producers or cooperatives of agricultural
producers as equity partners in the ventures; and (3) have a strategic
agreement in place to fairly reward feedstock suppliers.'' 42 U.S.C.
16251(e).
In order to implement this statutory priority scheme in a manner
that also complies with the statutory requirement to issue awards
beginning with the eligible entity that submits a bid for lowest level
of production incentive, DOE proposes to use the priorities in section
942(e) as a tie-breaker device. Specifically, the proposed rule
provides in section 452.5(c)(3) that in the event of a tie among the
lowest bids, preference will be given to the lowest tied bidder based
on DOE's evaluation of the extent to which of the tied bids best meets
one or more of the three statutory priority standards. In the event
more than one lowest tied bid is found to meet the priority standards
to an equal extent, section 452.5(c)(4) of the proposed rule states
that the award will be distributed equally on a per capita basis among
such bidders.
For example, assume the available funds for section 942 incentive
awards pursuant to congressional appropriations under a solicitation
and reverse auction are $2,500,000; assume further that there are two
pre-qualified lowest bidders, both of which are agricultural producers.
Assume further that these two bidders submitted identical low bids of
$.65 per gallon and the two bidders meet the statutory preference
standards to the same extent; but one of these bidders (Bidder A)
sought an incentive for 10,000,000 gallons of biofuels production,
while the other (Bidder B) sought an incentive for 5,000,000 gallons of
biofuels production. The total production incentive sought under these
circumstances for Bidder A is $6,500,000 and the total production
incentive sought by Bidder B is $3,250,000. Under these assumed facts,
DOE intends to make half of the appropriated funds ($1,250,000)
available for awards to each of the two lowest successful bidders.
Bidder A would not receive a greater award than Bidder B even though
its bid was based on double the production of Bidder B. This approach
would distribute incentives on the widest scale among lowest successful
bidders that qualify for statutory preferences.
DOE invites comments on its proposed method for determining the
successful bid. DOE is particularly interested in knowing whether it
would be advisable to apply the statutory priorities not as a tie
breaker device but as a pre-qualification preference or evaluation
point preference. With respect to the tie breaker approach proposed in
this NOPR, DOE is interested in receiving comments from the public
about the proposed prorating of awards among successful bids that meet
the statutory priority standards. DOE invites public comment on whether
it would be preferable for DOE to make a determination of which bidder
among those who have tied best meets the statutory priority standards,
thereby obviating the need to prorate awards. DOE is concerned that the
auction process could be ``gamed,'' i.e., there is a potential for
undisclosed business or investment interests to ``front'' a bidder that
qualifies for a statutory priority to the disadvantage of other bidders
that do not qualify for a statutory priority. DOE encourages parties to
comment on the likelihood of such abuses and how to best prevent them.
[[Page 78666]]
D. Incentive Award Terms and Limitations
1. Amount of Incentive. As required by section 942(c)(4)(B) of
EPAct 2005 and subject to appropriations, the proposed rule states that
an auction participant selected to receive an award shall receive the
amount of the production incentive on the per gallon basis requested in
the auction solicitation for each gallon produced and sold by the
entity during the first six years of operation.
2. Failure to Commence Production. As discussed above, the proposed
rule provides in section 452.4(d) that a successful bidder must enter
into an agreement with DOE under which the successful bidder agrees to
begin production of cellulosic biofuels not later than three years
after the date of the reverse auction in which it submitted a
successful bid. This is a statutory requirement contained in section
942(c)(4)(C) of EPAct 2005. Section 452.6(b) of the proposed rule
provides that failure of a successful bidder to fulfill the terms of
this agreement by actually commencing production of commercially
significant quantities of cellulosic biofuels within three years after
the date of the auction shall result in the immediate revocation of the
award. DOE invites comments and recommendations concerning the
appropriateness of this remedy.
3. Limitations. Section 942(d) of EPAct 2005 establishes five types
of limitations on the cellulosic biofuels production incentives,
including: (1) A per gallon amount determined by the Secretary may be
awarded during the first four years of the program; (2) a declining per
gallon cap on the incentives awarded over the remaining lifetime of the
program, to be established by the Secretary, so that cellulosic
biofuels produced after the first year of annual cellulosic biofuels
production in the United States in excess of one billion gallons are
cost competitive with gasoline and diesel; (3) not more than 25 percent
of the funds committed within each reverse auction may be awarded to
any one project; (4) not more than $100 million may be awarded in any
one year; and (5) not more than $1 billion may be awarded over the
lifetime of the program.
The proposed rule would implement the foregoing limitations at
section 452.6(c). In particular, the proposed rule provides that the
first of the above limitations shall be $1.00 per gallon during the
first four years of the program. For these purposes, the program would
be deemed to have commenced on the date that the first solicitation for
a reverse auction is issued. DOE's intent is to create an incentive for
early commencement of operations that yield commercially significant
production volumes in the near term. Because the second limitation
described above (the declining per gallon cap) will result in lower
incentive awards in years after the first four years of the program, an
earlier program commencement date should hasten the period during which
the higher limitation ceiling will be available. However, DOE solicits
comments and recommendations regarding its selection of the program
commencement date.
4. Transferability of Awards. The proposed rule would permit awards
to be transferred to successor entities that meet all eligibility
requirements for the program, as set forth in the proposed rule, and
enter into an agreement with the Secretary to commence production
within three years of the date of the reverse auction. DOE encourages
interested persons to submit comments and recommendations regarding
these proposed transferability restrictions. In addition, DOE requests
comments regarding any other transfer-related issues. For example,
should awards (including the right to the awards and the underlying
obligation to commence production within three years of the auction) be
transferable at all? If the awards should be transferable, should the
awards be transferable prior to the time that production commences?
Should the awards be transferable to entities not engaged in the
production of cellulosic biofuels, i.e., should DOE permit the creation
of a securitized interest and secondary market in production incentive
awards, or should DOE (as proposed in this NOPR) only permit entities
actually engaged in cellulosic ethanol production to receive the
awards?
III. Regulatory Review
A. Executive Order 12866
Today's proposed rule has been determined to be a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning
and Review,'' 58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993). Accordingly, this action
was subject to review under that Executive Order by the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB).
B. National Environmental Policy Act
DOE has determined that this proposed rule is covered under the
Categorical Exclusion found in the DOE's National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) regulations at paragraph A6 of Appendix A to Subpart D, 10
CFR Part 1021, which applies to rulemakings that are strictly
procedural. DOE notes that the procedures proposed in this NOPR do not
afford DOE discretion to determine whether or how a facility will be
constructed or operated. DOE's prescribed role under section 942, that
is, awarding production incentives to the lowest bidder in a reverse
auction, is strictly procedural. Accordingly, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required for the
proposed rule or for an award that DOE gives or proposes to give to a
successful bidder. If DOE subsequently proposes to take any additional
actions with respect to successful bidders, separate from the award of
funds under section 942 of EPAct 2005, DOE will separately evaluate the
need for NEPA review of those new proposed actions.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis for any rule
that by law must be proposed for public comment, unless the agency
certifies that the rule, if promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. As required
by Executive Order 13272, ``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking,'' 67 FR 53461 (August 16, 2002), DOE published
procedures and policies on February 19, 2003, to ensure that the
potential impacts of its rules on small entities are properly
considered during the rulemaking process (68 FR 7990). DOE has made its
procedures and policies available on the Office of General Counsel's
Web site: https://www.gc.doe.gov.
DOE has reviewed today's proposed rule under the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act and the procedures and policies published on
February 19, 2003. The proposed rule will only affect biofuels
producers if they choose to participate in the reverse auction.
Moreover, the proposed rule would provide an economic benefit without
imposing any regulatory requirements on producers of cellulosic
biofuels. On the basis of the foregoing, DOE certifies that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Accordingly, DOE has not prepared
a regulatory flexibility analysis for this rulemaking. This
certification and supporting statement of factual basis will be
provided to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
[[Page 78667]]
Business Administration pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
Proposed section 452.4(a) provides that entities that intend to
participate in a reverse auction must file a pre-auction eligibility
submission. The pre-auction eligibility submission must contain certain
information, including an implementation plan, as described above. This
information will be used by DOE to determine if an entity that files a
pre-auction eligibility submission will be accepted to participate in
the reverse auction.
In addition, proposed section 452.4(c) provides that a bidder must
submit a progress report. The progress report must contain the
additional information described above. DOE will use this information
to evaluate the bidder's progress in the production of cellulosic
biofuels. DOE has submitted this collection of information to the
Office of Management and Budget for approval pursuant to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and the procedures
implementing that Act, 5 CFR 1320.1 et seq.
DOE estimates that the annual reporting and recordkeeping burden
for this collection of information will be 30 hours per year (10
bidders x 3 hours) at a total annual cost of $2250 (10 bidders x $225
per auction). Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a federal agency. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to
a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
Interested parties are invited to submit comments to OMB addressed
to: Department of Energy Desk Officer, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.
Persons submitting comments to OMB also are requested to send a copy to
the DOE contact person at the address given in the ADDRESSES section of
this notice. OMB is particularly interested in comments on (1) The
necessity of the proposed information collection requirements,
including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the
accuracy of DOE's estimates of the burden; (3) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be maintained; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden of the requirements on respondents.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4) generally
requires Federal agencies to examine closely the impacts of regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal governments. Subsection 101(5) of
title I of that law defines a Federal intergovernmental mandate to
include any regulation that would impose upon State, local, or tribal
governments an enforceable duty, except a condition of Federal
assistance or a duty arising from participating in a voluntary federal
program. Title II of that law requires each Federal agency to assess
the effects of Federal regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector, other than to
the extent such actions merely incorporate requirements specifically
set forth in a statute. Section 202 of that title requires a Federal
agency to perform a detailed assessment of the anticipated costs and
benefits of any rule that includes a Federal mandate which may result
in costs to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private
sector, of $100 million or more in any one year (adjusted annually for
inflation). 2 U.S.C. 1532(a) and (b). Section 204 of that title
requires each agency that proposes a rule containing a significant
Federal intergovernmental mandate to develop an effective process for
obtaining meaningful and timely input from elected officers of State,
local, and tribal governments. 2 U.S.C. 1534.
This proposed rule would not impose a Federal mandate on State,
local, or tribal governments or on the private sector. Accordingly, no
assessment or analysis is required under the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995.
F. Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any proposed rule that may affect family
wellbeing. The proposed rule would not have any impact on the autonomy
or integrity of the family as an institution. Accordingly, DOE has
concluded that it is not necessary to prepare a Family Policymaking
Assessment.
G. Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' 64 FR 43255 (August 4, 1999)
imposes certain requirements on agencies formulating and implementing
policies or regulations that preempt State law or that have federalism
implications. Agencies are required to examine the constitutional and
statutory authority supporting any action that would limit the
policymaking discretion of the States and carefully assess the
necessity for such actions. DOE has examined this proposed rule and has
determined that it would not preempt State law and would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. No further
action is required by Executive Order 13132.
H. Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing regulations and the
promulgation of new regulations, section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988,
``Civil Justice Reform,'' 61 FR 4729 (February 7, 1996), imposes on
Executive agencies the general duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; and (3) provide a clear legal
standard for affected conduct rather than a general standard and
promote simplification and burden reduction. With regard to the review
required by section 3(a), section 3(b) of Executive Order 12988
specifically requires that Executive agencies make every reasonable
effort to ensure that the regulation: (1) Clearly specifies the
preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly specifies any effect on existing
Federal law or regulation; (3) provides a clear legal standard for
affected conduct while promoting simplification and burden reduction;
(4) specifies the retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately defines
key terms; and (6) addresses other important issues affecting clarity
and general draftsmanship under any guidelines issued by the Attorney
General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order 12988 requires Executive
agencies to review regulations in light of applicable standards in
section 3(a) and section 3(b) to determine whether they are met or it
is unreasonable to meet one or more of them. DOE has completed the
required review and determined that, to the extent permitted by law,
the proposed rule meets the relevant standards of Executive Order
12988.
I. Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001
The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001 (44
U.S.C. 3516 note) provides for agencies to review most disseminations
of information to the public under guidelines established by each
agency
[[Page 78668]]
pursuant to general guidelines issued by OMB.
OMB's guidelines were published at 67 FR 8452 (February 22, 2002),
and DOE's guidelines were published at 67 FR 62446 (October 7, 2002).
DOE has reviewed today's proposed rule under the OMB and DOE guidelines
and has concluded that it is consistent with applicable policies in
those guidelines.
J. Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' 66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001) requires Federal agencies to prepare and submit to OMB,
a Statement of Energy Effects for any proposed significant energy
action. A ``significant energy action'' is defined as any action by an
agency that promulgated or is expected to lead to promulgation of a
final rule, and that: (1) Is a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, or any successor order; and (2) is likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, or (3) is designated by the Administrator of OIRA as a
significant energy action. For any proposed significant energy action,
the agency must give a detailed statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the action and their expected
benefits on energy supply, distribution, and use. Today's regulatory
action would not have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy and is therefore not a significant
energy action. Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a Statement of Energy
Effects.
K. Consultation
Pursuant to section 942(c)(1) of EPAct 2005, DOE will consult with
the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Defense, and the
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency prior to issuing a
final rule.
IV. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The issuance of this proposed rule has been approved by the Office
of the Secretary.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 452
Fuel, Grant programs, Recordkeeping and reporting requirements,
Renewable energy.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 11, 2008.
Steven G. Chalk,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DOE proposes to amend
chapter II of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations by adding a
new part 452 as set forth below:
PART 452--PRODUCTION INCENTIVES FOR CELLULOSIC BIOFUELS
Sec.
452.1 Purpose and scope.
452.2 Definitions.
452.3 Solicitations.
452.4 Eligibility requirements.
452.5 Bidding procedures.
452.6 Incentive award terms and limitations.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 16251.
Sec. 452.1 Purpose and scope.
(a) This part sets forth the standards, policies, and procedures
that the Department of Energy uses for receiving, evaluating, and
awarding bids in reverse auctions of production incentive payments for
cellulosic biofuels under section 942 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005
(42 U.S.C. 16251).
(b) Part 1024 of chapter X of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations shall not apply to actions taken under this part.
Sec. 452.2 Definitions.
Cellulosic biofuels means any liquid fuel produced from cellulosic
feedstocks.
Cellulosic feedstock means any lignocellulosic feedstock as defined
by EPAct 2005, section 932(a)(2).
Commercially significant quantity means 10 million gallons or more
of cellulosic biofuels produced in one year.
DOE means the U.S. Department of Energy.
Eligible biofuels producer means a business association, including
but not limited to a sole proprietorship, partnership, joint venture,
corporation, or other business entity that owns and operates, or plans
to own and operate, an eligible cellulosic biofuels production facility
and that meets all other eligibility requirements that are conditions
on the receipt of production incentives under this part.
Eligible cellulosic biofuels production facility means a facility--
(1) Located in the United States (including U.S. territories and
possessions);
(2) Which meets all applicable Federal and State permitting
requirements; and
(3) Meets any financial criteria established by the Secretary.
EPAct 2005 means the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law 109-58
(August 8, 2005).
Open window means the period during each reverse auction, as
specified in an associated solicitation, during which DOE accepts bids
for production incentives under this part.
Secretary means the Secretary of Energy.
Sec. 452.3 Solicitations.
The reverse auction process commences with the issuance of a
solicitation by DOE. DOE will publish a solicitation in the Federal
Register and shall post the solicitation on its Web site at https://
www.eere.energy.gov no later than 60 days before the bidding in a
reverse auction under this part commences. The solicitation shall:
(a) Invite interested persons and businesses to submit pre-
qualification statements;
(b) Set forth the terms on which bids will be accepted;
(c) Specify the open window for bidding; and
(d) Specify the date by which successful bidders will be required
to file pre-auction eligibility submissions.
Sec. 452.4 Eligibility requirements.
(a) Pre-auction eligibility submissions. (1) Entities that intend
to participate in a reverse auction, within the time period stated in
the relevant solicitation, must file a pre-auction eligibility
submission that provides all information requested in the applicable
solicitation to which it is responding, including an implementation
plan.
(2) Each pre-auction eligibility submission's implementation plan
must, at a minimum:
(i) Demonstrate that the filing party owns and operates or plans to
own and operate an eligible cellulosic biofuels production facility;
(ii) Identify the site or proposed site for the filing party's
eligible cellulosic biofuels production facility; and
(iii) Identify one or more proposed sources of financing for the
construction or expansion of the filing party's eligible cellulosic
biofuels production facility.
(b) Notification of pre-auction eligibility status. DOE shall
notify each entity that files a pre-auction eligibility submission of
its acceptance or rejection no later than 15 days before the reverse
auction for which the submission was made. A DOE decision constitutes
final agency action and is conclusive.
[[Page 78669]]
(c) Progress reports. Within one year after the reverse auction in
which a bidder successfully competed, the bidder must submit a progress
report that includes all additional information required by the
solicitation in which the bidder submitted a successful bid and which
demonstrates that the bidder has:
(1) Acquired the site where its proposed eligible cellulosic
biofuels production facility is or will be located;
(2) Obtained secure financing commitments for the plant or
expansion thereof, as necessary to produce cellulosic biofuels; and
(3) Entered into a written engineering, procurement, and
construction (EPC) contract for design and construction of the eligible
cellulosic biofuels production facility; such EPC contract must provide
for completion of construction of the eligible cellulosic biofuels
production facility such that operations at the plant or plant
expansion will commence within three years of the reverse auction in
which the bidder successfully competed.
(d) Production agreement. Within 90 days after submission of its
progress report under paragraph (c) of this section, the successful
bidder must enter into an agreement with DOE which requires the bidder
to begin production of commercially significant quantities of
cellulosic biofuels, at the plant or plant expansion that was the
subject of the relevant bid, not later than three years from the date
of the acceptance of the successful bid.
(e) Confirmation of continuing eligibility. After receiving the
progress report under paragraph (c) of this section and upon
confirmation by DOE that the successful bidder has entered into a
production agreement with DOE, as described in paragraph (d) of this
section, DOE will confirm to the bidder that it continues to meet the
eligibility requirements of this part.
(f) Contractual condition on eligibility. (1) As a condition of the
receipt of an award under this part, a successful bidder in a reverse
auction under this part must demonstrate that it has fulfilled the
terms of its production agreement entered into with DOE pursuant to
paragraph (d) of this section.
(2) As a condition of continuing to receive production incentive
payments under this part, a bidder that has entered into a production
agreement with DOE must annually submit to DOE, by a commercially
reasonable date specified by DOE, verification of the bidder's
production volumes for the prior calendar year. Within 90 days of the
submission of such verification, DOE shall notify the successful bidder
whether the bidder has fulfilled the terms of the production agreement
and shall make payment of any production incentive awards then
outstanding for the one year period covered by the verified data
submission.
Sec. 452.5 Bidding procedures.
DOE shall conduct an electronic reverse auction through a limited
duration single bid per producer auction process open only to pre-
auction eligible cellulosic biofuels producers. The following
procedures shall be used:
(a) DOE shall accept only electronic bids received from pre-auction
eligible cellulosic biofuels producers during the open window
established in the solicitation. The open window shall consist of a
single continuous period of at least four hours for each auction.
(b) Bids must specify:
(1) A desired level of production incentive on a per gallon basis.
(2) An estimated annual production amount in gallons.
(3) All bids will be confidential until 45 days after the close of
the window for submission of bids for the reverse auction.
(c) Bid evaluation and incentive awards selection.
(1) After DOE evaluates the bids received during the open window,
it shall, within 45 days following the close of the open window for
submission of bids for the reverse auction, announce on DOE's Web site
and by direct mail the names of the successful bidders and the terms of
their bids.
(2) DOE shall issue awards for the bid production amounts beginning
with the bidder that submitted the bid for the lowest level of
production incentive on a per gallon basis.
(3) In the event of a tie among the lowest bids, preference will be
given to the lowest tied bidder based on DOE's evaluation of the extent
to which the tied bids meet the following criteria:
(i) Demonstrates outstanding potential for local and regional
economic development;
(ii) Includes agricultural producers or cooperatives of
agricultural producers as equity partners in the ventures; and
(iii) Has a strategic agreement in place to fairly reward feedstock
suppliers.
(4) In the event more than one lowest tied bid equally meets the
standards in paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the award will be
distributed equally on a per capita basis among those lowest tied
bidders meeting the standards.
Sec. 452.6 Incentive award terms and limitations.
(a) Amount of incentive. Subject to the availability of
appropriated funds and the limitations in paragraph (c) of this
section, an eligible cellulosic biofuels producer selected to receive
an award shall receive the amount of the production incentive on the
per gallon basis requested in the auction solicitation for each gallon
produced and sold by the entity during the first six years of operation
of its eligible cellulosic biofuels production facility.
(b) Failure to commence production. Failure by an eligible
cellulosic biofuels producer that made a successful bid to commence
production of cellulosic biofuels, at the eligible cellulosic biofuels
production facility that was the subject of the successful bid, by the
end of the third year after the close of submission of the open window
of bids for the reverse auction in which it submitted a successful bid,
shall result in immediate revocation of DOE's award to that producer.
(c) Incentive award limitations. The following limits shall apply
to awards of cellulosic biofuels production incentives under this part:
(1) During the first four years after the commencement of the
program, the incentive shall be limited to $1.00 per gallon. For
purposes of this limitation, the program shall be deemed to have
commenced on the date that the first solicitation for a reverse auction
is issued;
(2) A per gallon cap over the remaining lifetime of the program of
$.95 per gallon provided that--
(i) This cap shall be lowered by $.05 each year commencing the
first year after annual cellulosic biofuels production in the United
States exceeds one billion gallons;
(ii) Not more than 25 percent of the funds committed within each
reverse auction shall be awarded to any single project;
(iii) Not more than $100 million in production incentives shall be
awarded in any one calendar year; and
(iv) Not more than $1 billion in production incentives shall be
awarded over the lifetime of the program.
(d) Participation in subsequent auctions. A successful bidder in a
reverse auction under this part may participate in subsequent reverse
auctions if the incentives sought will assist the addition of plant
production capacity for the eligible cellulosic biofuels production
facility associated with its previously successful bid.
(e) Transferability of awards. A production incentive award under
this part may be transferred to a successor entity that meets all
eligibility requirements of this part, including execution of an
agreement with DOE to commence production of cellulosic
[[Page 78670]]
biofuels in commercially significant quantities not later than three
years of the date that bidding closes on the reverse auction in which
the predecessor entity submitted a successful bid.
[FR Doc. E8-30500 Filed 12-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P