Medicare, Medicaid, and CLIA Programs; Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 Exemption of Permit-Holding Laboratories in the State of New York, 78368-78370 [E8-30452]
Download as PDF
78368
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 246 / Monday, December 22, 2008 / Notices
meetings, CMS reimburses travel, meals,
lodging, and related expenses in
accordance with standard Government
travel regulations.
CMS has a special interest in
attempting to ensure, while taking into
account the nominee pool, that the
Panel is diverse in all respects of the
following: Geography; rural or urban
practice; race, ethnicity, sex, and
disability; medical or technical
specialty; and type of hospital, hospital
health system, or other Medicare
provider subject to the OPPS.
Based upon either self-nominations or
nominations submitted by providers or
interested organizations, the Secretary,
or his designee, appoints new members
to the Panel from among those
candidates determined to have the
required expertise. New appointments
are made in a manner that ensures a
balanced membership under the
guidelines of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
II. Criteria for Nominees
The Panel must be fairly balanced in
its membership in terms of the points of
view represented and the functions to
be performed. The Panel shall consist of
up to 15 members who are
representatives of providers. Each Panel
member must be employed full-time by
a hospital, hospital system, or other
Medicare provider subject to payment
under the OPPS. All members must
have technical expertise to enable them
to participate fully in the Panel’s work.
The expertise encompasses hospital
payment systems; hospital medical care
delivery systems; provider billing
systems; APC groups; Current
Procedural Terminology codes; and
alpha-numeric Health Care Common
Procedure Coding System codes; and
the use of, and payment for, drugs,
medical devices, and other services in
the outpatient setting, as well as other
forms of relevant expertise.
It is not necessary for a nominee to
possess expertise in all of the areas
listed, but each must have a minimum
of 5 years experience and currently have
full-time employment in his or her area
of expertise. Members of the Panel serve
overlapping terms up to 4 years, based
on the needs of the Panel and
contingent upon the rechartering of the
Panel.
Any interested person or organization
may nominate one or more qualified
individuals. Self-nominations will also
be accepted. Each nomination must
include the following:
• Letter of Nomination;
• Curriculum Vita of the nominee;
and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:07 Dec 19, 2008
Jkt 217001
• Written statement from the nominee
that the nominee is willing to serve on
the Panel under the conditions
described in this notice and further
specified in the Charter.
III. Copies of the Charter
To obtain a copy of the Panel’s
Charter, submit a written request to the
DFO at the address provided in the
ADDRESSES section or by e-mail at CMS
APCPanel@cms.hhs.gov, or call 410–
786–4474.
Copies of the Charter are also
available on the Internet at the
following: https://www.cms.hhs.gov/
FACA/05_AdvisoryPanelonAmbulatory
PaymentClassificationGroups.asp#
TopOfPage.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.774, MedicareSupplementary Medical Insurance Program).
Dated: December 11, 2008.
Kerry Weems,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. E8–30454 Filed 12–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–2283–N]
RIN 0938–AP20
Medicare, Medicaid, and CLIA
Programs; Clinical Laboratory
Improvement Amendments of 1988
Exemption of Permit-Holding
Laboratories in the State of New York
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: This notice announces that
CMS has granted exemption from CLIA
requirements to laboratories located
within the State of New York that
possess a valid permit under Article
Five of Title V of the Public Health Law
of the State of New York and its
implementing regulations at 10 N.Y.
Comp. Codes R. & Regs., Title V, Part 58.
DATES: Effective Date: The exemption
granted by this notice is effective, unless
revoked, for 6 years from the date of
publication of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Coppola (410) 786–3531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Val
I. Background
A. Federal Law
Section 353 of the Public Health
Service Act (the Act), as amended by the
Clinical Laboratory Improvement
Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) (42 U.S.C.
263a) generally requires any laboratory
that performs tests on human specimens
for the diagnosis, prevention or
treatment of any disease or impairment
of, or assessment of the health of human
beings to possess a certificate to perform
that category of tests issued by the
Secretary of the Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS). Under
sections 1861(s) of the Social Security
Act, the Medicare program will only pay
for laboratory services if the laboratory
meets the certification requirements
under section 353 of the Public Health
Service Act. Section 1902(a)(9)(C) of the
Social Security Act requires that State
Medicaid plans pay only for laboratory
services furnished by laboratories in
compliance with section 353 of the Act.
Subject to specified exceptions,
laboratories therefore must have a
current and valid CLIA certificate to be
eligible for payment from the Medicare
or Medicaid programs. Regulations
implementing section 353 of the Act are
contained in 42 CFR part 493.
Section 353(p) of the PHS Act
provides for the exemption of
laboratories from CLIA requirements in
States that enact legal requirements that
are equal to or more stringent than
CLIA’s statutory and regulatory
requirements.
Section 353(p) of the Act is
implemented in subpart E of regulations
at 42 CFR part 493. Sections 493.551
and 493.553 provide that we may
exempt from CLIA requirements, for a
period not to exceed 6 years, State
licensed or approved laboratories in a
State if the State licensure program
meets specified conditions. Section
493.559 provides that we will publish a
notice in the Federal Register when we
grant approval to an approved State
laboratory licensure program. It also
provides that the notice will include the
following:
• The basis for granting the
exemption.
• A description of how the laboratory
requirements are equal to or more
stringent than those of CLIA.
• The term of approval, not to exceed
6 years.
B. New York State Law
This title is generally applicable to all
clinical laboratories operating within
the state of New York except those
operated by the Federal Government
and those operated by a licensed
E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM
22DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 246 / Monday, December 22, 2008 / Notices
physician, osteopath, dentist, midwife,
nurse practitioner or podiatrist who
performs laboratory tests or procedures,
personally or through his or her
employees, solely as an adjunct to the
treatment of his or her own patients.
This notice is a repeat of New York
State’s laboratory licensure program’s
CMS approval under CLIA, and
announces the beginning of a new
period of exemption for its permitted
laboratories.
II. Notice of Approval of CLIA
Exemption to the New York State
Laboratories
By this notice, we grant CLIA
exemption to all laboratories located in
the State of New York that possess a
valid and appropriate permit to perform
laboratory testing under New York’s
‘‘Clinical Laboratory Evaluation
Program.’’
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
III. Evaluation of the New York
Laboratory Licensure (Permit) Program,
the Clinical Laboratory Evaluation
Program (CLEP)
The State of New York applied for
exemption of its CLEP permit holding
laboratories from CLIA program
requirements. The State of New York
submitted all of the applicable
information and attestations required by
§ 493.551, § 493.553, and § 493.557 for
State licensure programs seeking
exemption of their licensed laboratories
from CLIA program requirements.
Examples of the documents and
information that were submitted and
reviewed are: A comparison of its
laboratory licensure requirements with
comparable CLIA condition-level
requirements and descriptions of its:
inspection and proficiency testing
monitoring processes, data management
and analysis system, investigative and
response procedures for complaints
received against laboratories, and
policies regarding inspections.
IV. CMS and the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) Analysis
of New York’s Application and
Supporting Documentation
In order to determine whether we
should grant a CLIA exemption to
laboratories licensed by a State, we,
with staff from CDC, review the
application and additional
documentation that the State submits to
CMS and conducted a detailed and indepth comparison of the CLEP State
licensure (permit) program and CLIA
requirements to determine whether the
State program meets or exceeds the
requirements at subpart E of part 493.
In summary, the State generally must
demonstrate that its State licensure
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:07 Dec 19, 2008
Jkt 217001
program meets the following
requirements:
• Has State laws in effect that provide
for laboratory licensure/permit program
with requirements that are equal to or
more stringent than CLIA conditionlevel requirements for laboratories.
• Has a State licensure program with
requirements that are equal to or more
stringent than the CLIA condition-level
requirements such that a State program
licensed laboratory would meet the
CLIA condition-level requirements if it
were inspected against those
requirements.
• Is shown to meet the requirements
of § 493.553, § 493.555, and § 493.557(b)
and is approved by CMS under
§ 493.551. For example, among other
things, a program would need to:
—Demonstrate that it has enforcement
authority and administrative
structures and resources adequate to
enforce its laboratory requirements.
—Permit CMS or CMS agents to inspect
laboratories within the State.
—Require laboratories within the State
to submit to inspections by CMS or
CMS agents as a condition of
licensure.
—Agree to pay the cost of the validation
program administered by CMS and
the cost of the State’s pro rata share
of the general overhead to develop
and implement CLIA as specified in
§ 493.645(a), § 493.646(b), and
§ 493.557(b).
—Take appropriate enforcement action
against laboratories found by CMS or
CMS agents not to be in compliance
with requirements comparable to
condition-level requirements, as
specified in § 493.557(b).
As specified in our regulations at
§ 493.555 and § 493.557(b), our review
of a State laboratory program includes
(but is not necessarily limited to) an
evaluation of the following:
• Whether the State’s requirements
for laboratories are equal to or more
stringent than the CLIA condition-level
requirements.
• The State’s inspection process
requirements to determine the
following:
—The comparability of the full
inspection and complaint inspection
procedures to those of CMS.
—The State’s enforcement authority and
procedures for laboratories found to
be out of compliance with its
requirements.
—The State’s ability to electronically
provide CMS with reports and data
about adverse actions and corrective
actions resulting from unsuccessful
proficiency testing participation and
with other data we determine to be
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78369
necessary for validation review and
assessment of the State’s inspection
process requirements.
• The State’s agreement with CMS to
ensure that the agreement obligates the
State to do the following:
—Notify CMS within 30 days of the
action taken against any CLIA-exempt
laboratory that has had its licensure or
approval withdrawn or revoked or
been in any way sanctioned.
—Notify CMS within 10 days of any
deficiency identified in a CLIAexempt laboratory in cases when the
deficiency poses an immediate
jeopardy to the laboratory’s patients
or a hazard to the general public.
—Notify each laboratory licensed by the
State within 10 days of CMS’
withdrawal of the exemption.
—Provide CMS with written notification
of any changes in its licensure (or
approval) and inspection
requirements.
—Disclose to CMS or a CMS agent any
laboratory’s PT results in accordance
with a State’s confidentiality
requirements.
—Take the appropriate enforcement
action against laboratories found by
CMS not to be in compliance with
CLIA condition-level requirements in
a validation survey and report these
enforcement actions to CMS.
—Notify CMS of all newly licensed
laboratories, including changes in the
specialties and subspecialties for
which any laboratory performs
testing, within 30 days.
—Provide CMS, as requested, inspection
schedules for validation purposes.
In keeping with the process described
above, CMS, with the assistance of CDC,
reviewed and evaluated the application
and supporting materials that were
submitted by CLEP to verify that the
CLEP permit holding laboratories will
meet or exceed the requirements of the
following subparts of part 493: Subpart
H, Participation in Proficiency Testing
for Laboratories Performing Nonwaived
Testing; Subpart J, Facility
Administration for Nonwaived Testing;
Subpart K, Quality Systems for
Nonwaived Testing, Subpart M,
Personnel for Nonwaived Testing;
Subpart Q, Inspection; and Subpart R,
Enforcement Procedures.
We found that the CLEP requirements
mapped to all the applicable CLIA
condition-level requirements. The New
York State licensure program’s
inspection process and proficiency
testing monitoring processes are equal
to or more stringent than those of the
CLIA program. Other materials that
were submitted demonstrated
compliance with the other above-
E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM
22DEN1
78370
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 246 / Monday, December 22, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
referenced requirements of subpart E of
Part 493. As a result, CMS concluded
that the submitted documents supported
exempting permit holding laboratories
under the CLEP from the CLIA program
requirements. Furthermore, a review of
CMS’ validation inspections conducted
by the CMS Regional Office in New
York, New York supported that
conclusion.
The Federal validation inspections of
CLEP permit holding laboratories, as
specified in § 493.563, were conducted
on a representative sample basis as well
as in response to any substantial
allegations of noncompliance
(complaint inspections). The outcome of
those validation inspections has been
and will continue to be CMS’ principal
tool for verifying that the laboratories
located within the State that hold valid
permits are in compliance with CLIA
requirements.
The CMS Regional Office in New
York has conducted validation
inspections of a representative sample
(approximately 5 percent) of the
laboratories inspected by the New York
State Office of Laboratory Quality
Assurance (LQA). For some of these
validation inspections, CMS surveyors
simply accompanied New York State’s
inspectors, each inspecting against his
or her agency’s respective regulations.
Analysis of the validation data revealed
no significant differences between the
State and Federal findings. The
validation surveys verified that the
CLEP inspection process covers all CLIA
conditions applicable to each laboratory
being inspected, and also verified that
the CLEP licensure (permit)
requirements meet or exceed CLIA
condition-level requirements. The CMS
validation surveys found the State
inspectors highly skilled and qualified.
The CLEP inspected laboratories in
timely fashion, that is, all laboratories
were inspected within the required 24month cycle. All parameters monitored
by CMS’ New York Regional Office to
date indicate that the State of New York
is meeting all requirements for approval
of CLIA exemption.
This Federal monitoring will continue
as an on-going process.
V. Conclusion
Based on review of the documents
submitted by the New York State
laboratory licensure program, CLEP,
pursuant to the requirements of subpart
E of part 493, as well as the outcome of
the validation inspections conducted by
the CMS Regional Office in New York,
we find that the State of New York
laboratory licensure program meets the
requirements of 42 CFR 493.551(a), and
that as a result, we may exempt from
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:07 Dec 19, 2008
Jkt 217001
CLIA program requirements all State
licensed (permitted) or approved
laboratories.
Approval of the CLIA exemption for
laboratories located within and
permitted by the State of New York is
subject to removal if we determine that
the outcome of a comparability review
or a validation review inspection is not
acceptable, as described under § 493.573
and § 493.575, or if the State of New
York fails to pay the required fee every
2 years as required under § 493.646.
VI. Laboratory Data
In accordance with our regulations at
§ 493.557(b)(8), the State of New York
will continue to agree to provide us
with changes to a laboratory’s
specialties or subspecialties based on
the State’s survey. The State of New
York also will provide us with changes
in a laboratory’s certification status.
VII. Required Administrative Actions
CLIA is a user-fee funded program.
The registration fee paid by laboratories
is intended to cover the cost of the
development and administration of the
program. However, when a State’s
application for exemption is approved,
we do not charge a fee to laboratories in
the State. The State’s share of the costs
associated with CLIA must be collected
from the State, as specified in § 493.645.
Accordingly, the State of New York
must pay for the following:
• Costs of Federal inspection of
laboratories in the State to verify that
New York State’s CLEP requirements are
enforced in an appropriate manner. The
average Federal hourly rate is
multiplied by the total hours required to
perform Federal validation surveys
within the State.
• Costs incurred for Federal
investigations and surveys triggered by
complaints that are substantiated. We
will bill the State of New York on a
semiannual basis.
• The State of New York’s
proportionate share of the costs
associated with establishing,
maintaining, and improving the CLIA
computer system, a portion of those
services from which the State of New
York received direct benefit or
contributed to the CLIA program in the
State. Thus, the State of New York is
being charged for a portion of CMS’
direct and indirect costs as well as a
portion of the costs incurred by the CDC
and the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) in carrying out their
responsibilities under CLIA.
In order to estimate the State of New
York’s proportionate share of the
general overhead costs to develop and
implement CLIA, we determined the
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ratio of laboratories in the State to the
total number of laboratories nationally.
Approximately 1.5 percent of the
registered laboratories are in the State of
New York. We determined that a
corresponding percentage of the
applicable CDC, FDA, and CMS costs
should be borne by the State of New
York.
The State of New York has agreed to
pay us the State’s pro rata share of the
overhead costs and anticipated costs of
actual validation and complaint
investigation surveys. A final
reconciliation for all laboratories and all
expenses will be made. We will
reimburse the State for any overpayment
or bill it for any balance.
VIII. Approval
In light of the foregoing, CMS grants
approval of the State of New York’s
laboratory licensure program (CLEP)
under Subpart E. All laboratories
located within the State of New York
and hold valid CLEP permits are CLIAexempt for all specialties and
subspecialties.
Authority: Section 353(p) of the Public
Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 263a).
Dated: November 7, 2008.
Kerry Weems,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. E8–30452 Filed 12–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Proposed Projects
Title: Hispanic Healthy Marriage
Initiative Grantee Implementation
Evaluation.
OMB No.: New Collection.
Description: The Administration for
Children and Families (ACF), in
partnership with the Office of the
Assistant Secretary for Planning,
Research and Evaluation (ASPE), U.S.
Department of Health and Human
Services, is proposing an information
collection activity as part of the
Hispanic Healthy Marriage Initiative
(HHMI) Grantee Implementation
Evaluation study. The proposed
information collection consists of two
components: (1) Semistructured
interviews with key respondents
involved with selected marriage
education programs serving Hispanic
couples and individuals; and (2) focus
E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM
22DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 246 (Monday, December 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78368-78370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-30452]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
[CMS-2283-N]
RIN 0938-AP20
Medicare, Medicaid, and CLIA Programs; Clinical Laboratory
Improvement Amendments of 1988 Exemption of Permit-Holding Laboratories
in the State of New York
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces that CMS has granted exemption from CLIA
requirements to laboratories located within the State of New York that
possess a valid permit under Article Five of Title V of the Public
Health Law of the State of New York and its implementing regulations at
10 N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs., Title V, Part 58.
DATES: Effective Date: The exemption granted by this notice is
effective, unless revoked, for 6 years from the date of publication of
this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Val Coppola (410) 786-3531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Federal Law
Section 353 of the Public Health Service Act (the Act), as amended
by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) (42
U.S.C. 263a) generally requires any laboratory that performs tests on
human specimens for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of any
disease or impairment of, or assessment of the health of human beings
to possess a certificate to perform that category of tests issued by
the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Under sections 1861(s) of the Social Security Act, the Medicare program
will only pay for laboratory services if the laboratory meets the
certification requirements under section 353 of the Public Health
Service Act. Section 1902(a)(9)(C) of the Social Security Act requires
that State Medicaid plans pay only for laboratory services furnished by
laboratories in compliance with section 353 of the Act. Subject to
specified exceptions, laboratories therefore must have a current and
valid CLIA certificate to be eligible for payment from the Medicare or
Medicaid programs. Regulations implementing section 353 of the Act are
contained in 42 CFR part 493.
Section 353(p) of the PHS Act provides for the exemption of
laboratories from CLIA requirements in States that enact legal
requirements that are equal to or more stringent than CLIA's statutory
and regulatory requirements.
Section 353(p) of the Act is implemented in subpart E of
regulations at 42 CFR part 493. Sections 493.551 and 493.553 provide
that we may exempt from CLIA requirements, for a period not to exceed 6
years, State licensed or approved laboratories in a State if the State
licensure program meets specified conditions. Section 493.559 provides
that we will publish a notice in the Federal Register when we grant
approval to an approved State laboratory licensure program. It also
provides that the notice will include the following:
The basis for granting the exemption.
A description of how the laboratory requirements are equal
to or more stringent than those of CLIA.
The term of approval, not to exceed 6 years.
B. New York State Law
This title is generally applicable to all clinical laboratories
operating within the state of New York except those operated by the
Federal Government and those operated by a licensed
[[Page 78369]]
physician, osteopath, dentist, midwife, nurse practitioner or
podiatrist who performs laboratory tests or procedures, personally or
through his or her employees, solely as an adjunct to the treatment of
his or her own patients. This notice is a repeat of New York State's
laboratory licensure program's CMS approval under CLIA, and announces
the beginning of a new period of exemption for its permitted
laboratories.
II. Notice of Approval of CLIA Exemption to the New York State
Laboratories
By this notice, we grant CLIA exemption to all laboratories located
in the State of New York that possess a valid and appropriate permit to
perform laboratory testing under New York's ``Clinical Laboratory
Evaluation Program.''
III. Evaluation of the New York Laboratory Licensure (Permit) Program,
the Clinical Laboratory Evaluation Program (CLEP)
The State of New York applied for exemption of its CLEP permit
holding laboratories from CLIA program requirements. The State of New
York submitted all of the applicable information and attestations
required by Sec. 493.551, Sec. 493.553, and Sec. 493.557 for State
licensure programs seeking exemption of their licensed laboratories
from CLIA program requirements. Examples of the documents and
information that were submitted and reviewed are: A comparison of its
laboratory licensure requirements with comparable CLIA condition-level
requirements and descriptions of its: inspection and proficiency
testing monitoring processes, data management and analysis system,
investigative and response procedures for complaints received against
laboratories, and policies regarding inspections.
IV. CMS and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Analysis of New York's Application and Supporting Documentation
In order to determine whether we should grant a CLIA exemption to
laboratories licensed by a State, we, with staff from CDC, review the
application and additional documentation that the State submits to CMS
and conducted a detailed and in-depth comparison of the CLEP State
licensure (permit) program and CLIA requirements to determine whether
the State program meets or exceeds the requirements at subpart E of
part 493.
In summary, the State generally must demonstrate that its State
licensure program meets the following requirements:
Has State laws in effect that provide for laboratory
licensure/permit program with requirements that are equal to or more
stringent than CLIA condition-level requirements for laboratories.
Has a State licensure program with requirements that are
equal to or more stringent than the CLIA condition-level requirements
such that a State program licensed laboratory would meet the CLIA
condition-level requirements if it were inspected against those
requirements.
Is shown to meet the requirements of Sec. 493.553, Sec.
493.555, and Sec. 493.557(b) and is approved by CMS under Sec.
493.551. For example, among other things, a program would need to:
--Demonstrate that it has enforcement authority and administrative
structures and resources adequate to enforce its laboratory
requirements.
--Permit CMS or CMS agents to inspect laboratories within the State.
--Require laboratories within the State to submit to inspections by CMS
or CMS agents as a condition of licensure.
--Agree to pay the cost of the validation program administered by CMS
and the cost of the State's pro rata share of the general overhead to
develop and implement CLIA as specified in Sec. 493.645(a), Sec.
493.646(b), and Sec. 493.557(b).
--Take appropriate enforcement action against laboratories found by CMS
or CMS agents not to be in compliance with requirements comparable to
condition-level requirements, as specified in Sec. 493.557(b).
As specified in our regulations at Sec. 493.555 and Sec.
493.557(b), our review of a State laboratory program includes (but is
not necessarily limited to) an evaluation of the following:
Whether the State's requirements for laboratories are
equal to or more stringent than the CLIA condition-level requirements.
The State's inspection process requirements to determine
the following:
--The comparability of the full inspection and complaint inspection
procedures to those of CMS.
--The State's enforcement authority and procedures for laboratories
found to be out of compliance with its requirements.
--The State's ability to electronically provide CMS with reports and
data about adverse actions and corrective actions resulting from
unsuccessful proficiency testing participation and with other data we
determine to be necessary for validation review and assessment of the
State's inspection process requirements.
The State's agreement with CMS to ensure that the
agreement obligates the State to do the following:
--Notify CMS within 30 days of the action taken against any CLIA-exempt
laboratory that has had its licensure or approval withdrawn or revoked
or been in any way sanctioned.
--Notify CMS within 10 days of any deficiency identified in a CLIA-
exempt laboratory in cases when the deficiency poses an immediate
jeopardy to the laboratory's patients or a hazard to the general
public.
--Notify each laboratory licensed by the State within 10 days of CMS'
withdrawal of the exemption.
--Provide CMS with written notification of any changes in its licensure
(or approval) and inspection requirements.
--Disclose to CMS or a CMS agent any laboratory's PT results in
accordance with a State's confidentiality requirements.
--Take the appropriate enforcement action against laboratories found by
CMS not to be in compliance with CLIA condition-level requirements in a
validation survey and report these enforcement actions to CMS.
--Notify CMS of all newly licensed laboratories, including changes in
the specialties and subspecialties for which any laboratory performs
testing, within 30 days.
--Provide CMS, as requested, inspection schedules for validation
purposes.
In keeping with the process described above, CMS, with the
assistance of CDC, reviewed and evaluated the application and
supporting materials that were submitted by CLEP to verify that the
CLEP permit holding laboratories will meet or exceed the requirements
of the following subparts of part 493: Subpart H, Participation in
Proficiency Testing for Laboratories Performing Nonwaived Testing;
Subpart J, Facility Administration for Nonwaived Testing; Subpart K,
Quality Systems for Nonwaived Testing, Subpart M, Personnel for
Nonwaived Testing; Subpart Q, Inspection; and Subpart R, Enforcement
Procedures.
We found that the CLEP requirements mapped to all the applicable
CLIA condition-level requirements. The New York State licensure
program's inspection process and proficiency testing monitoring
processes are equal to or more stringent than those of the CLIA
program. Other materials that were submitted demonstrated compliance
with the other above-
[[Page 78370]]
referenced requirements of subpart E of Part 493. As a result, CMS
concluded that the submitted documents supported exempting permit
holding laboratories under the CLEP from the CLIA program requirements.
Furthermore, a review of CMS' validation inspections conducted by the
CMS Regional Office in New York, New York supported that conclusion.
The Federal validation inspections of CLEP permit holding
laboratories, as specified in Sec. 493.563, were conducted on a
representative sample basis as well as in response to any substantial
allegations of noncompliance (complaint inspections). The outcome of
those validation inspections has been and will continue to be CMS'
principal tool for verifying that the laboratories located within the
State that hold valid permits are in compliance with CLIA requirements.
The CMS Regional Office in New York has conducted validation
inspections of a representative sample (approximately 5 percent) of the
laboratories inspected by the New York State Office of Laboratory
Quality Assurance (LQA). For some of these validation inspections, CMS
surveyors simply accompanied New York State's inspectors, each
inspecting against his or her agency's respective regulations. Analysis
of the validation data revealed no significant differences between the
State and Federal findings. The validation surveys verified that the
CLEP inspection process covers all CLIA conditions applicable to each
laboratory being inspected, and also verified that the CLEP licensure
(permit) requirements meet or exceed CLIA condition-level requirements.
The CMS validation surveys found the State inspectors highly skilled
and qualified. The CLEP inspected laboratories in timely fashion, that
is, all laboratories were inspected within the required 24-month cycle.
All parameters monitored by CMS' New York Regional Office to date
indicate that the State of New York is meeting all requirements for
approval of CLIA exemption.
This Federal monitoring will continue as an on-going process.
V. Conclusion
Based on review of the documents submitted by the New York State
laboratory licensure program, CLEP, pursuant to the requirements of
subpart E of part 493, as well as the outcome of the validation
inspections conducted by the CMS Regional Office in New York, we find
that the State of New York laboratory licensure program meets the
requirements of 42 CFR 493.551(a), and that as a result, we may exempt
from CLIA program requirements all State licensed (permitted) or
approved laboratories.
Approval of the CLIA exemption for laboratories located within and
permitted by the State of New York is subject to removal if we
determine that the outcome of a comparability review or a validation
review inspection is not acceptable, as described under Sec. 493.573
and Sec. 493.575, or if the State of New York fails to pay the
required fee every 2 years as required under Sec. 493.646.
VI. Laboratory Data
In accordance with our regulations at Sec. 493.557(b)(8), the
State of New York will continue to agree to provide us with changes to
a laboratory's specialties or subspecialties based on the State's
survey. The State of New York also will provide us with changes in a
laboratory's certification status.
VII. Required Administrative Actions
CLIA is a user-fee funded program. The registration fee paid by
laboratories is intended to cover the cost of the development and
administration of the program. However, when a State's application for
exemption is approved, we do not charge a fee to laboratories in the
State. The State's share of the costs associated with CLIA must be
collected from the State, as specified in Sec. 493.645.
Accordingly, the State of New York must pay for the following:
Costs of Federal inspection of laboratories in the State
to verify that New York State's CLEP requirements are enforced in an
appropriate manner. The average Federal hourly rate is multiplied by
the total hours required to perform Federal validation surveys within
the State.
Costs incurred for Federal investigations and surveys
triggered by complaints that are substantiated. We will bill the State
of New York on a semiannual basis.
The State of New York's proportionate share of the costs
associated with establishing, maintaining, and improving the CLIA
computer system, a portion of those services from which the State of
New York received direct benefit or contributed to the CLIA program in
the State. Thus, the State of New York is being charged for a portion
of CMS' direct and indirect costs as well as a portion of the costs
incurred by the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in
carrying out their responsibilities under CLIA.
In order to estimate the State of New York's proportionate share of
the general overhead costs to develop and implement CLIA, we determined
the ratio of laboratories in the State to the total number of
laboratories nationally. Approximately 1.5 percent of the registered
laboratories are in the State of New York. We determined that a
corresponding percentage of the applicable CDC, FDA, and CMS costs
should be borne by the State of New York.
The State of New York has agreed to pay us the State's pro rata
share of the overhead costs and anticipated costs of actual validation
and complaint investigation surveys. A final reconciliation for all
laboratories and all expenses will be made. We will reimburse the State
for any overpayment or bill it for any balance.
VIII. Approval
In light of the foregoing, CMS grants approval of the State of New
York's laboratory licensure program (CLEP) under Subpart E. All
laboratories located within the State of New York and hold valid CLEP
permits are CLIA-exempt for all specialties and subspecialties.
Authority: Section 353(p) of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 263a).
Dated: November 7, 2008.
Kerry Weems,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. E8-30452 Filed 12-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P