Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Guided Sport Charter Vessel Fishery for Halibut, 78276-78283 [E8-30376]
Download as PDF
78276
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 246 / Monday, December 22, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Exchange (CDX) using EPA-provided ePMN reporting software in the manner
set forth in § 725.25(c). See
§ 725.25(c)(4) for how to obtain the ePMN software, CDX reporting
instructions, and other associated
documents. Support documents related
to these requests must also be submitted
to EPA via CDX using e-PMN software.
Paper requests must be submitted to the
Document Control Office (DCO)
(7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; ATTN:
Request to Amend SNUR. Optical discs
containing electronic requests must be
submitted by courier to the
Environmental Protection Agency,
OPPT Document Control Office (DCO),
EPA East Bldg., 1201 Constitution Ave.,
NW., Rm. 6428, Washington, DC 20004;
ATTN: Request to Amend SNUR.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–30379 Filed 12–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 0808061071–81575–01]
RIN 0648–AX17
Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Guided Sport
Charter Vessel Fishery for Halibut
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations
that would limit the harvest of Pacific
halibut by guided sport charter vessel
anglers in International Pacific Halibut
Commission Regulatory Area 2C (Area
2C) of Southeast Alaska to one halibut
per day. This proposed regulatory
change is necessary to reduce the
halibut harvest in the charter vessel
sector to approximately the guideline
harvest level for Area 2C. The intended
effect of this action is to manage the
harvest of halibut consistent with an
allocation strategy recommended by the
North Pacific Management Council for
the guided sport charter vessel fishery
and the commercial fishery.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than January 21, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Sue
Salveson, Assistant Regional
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Dec 19, 2008
Jkt 217001
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. You may submit
comments, identified by ‘‘RIN 0648–
AX17’’ by any one of the following
methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal website at
https://www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: P. O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK
99802.
• Fax: (907) 586–7557.
• Hand delivery to the Federal
Building: 709 West 9th Street, Room
420A, Juneau, AK.
All comments received are a part of
the public record and will be posted to
https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying
Information (e.g., name, address)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter N/A in the required
fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments must be in Microsoft Word,
Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe portable
document file (pdf) formats to be
accepted.
Copies of the Environmental
Assessment (EA), Regulatory Impact
Review (RIR), and Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) prepared for
this action may be obtained from NMFS
Alaska Region, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau,
Alaska 99802, Attn: Ellen Sebastian, and
on the NMFS Alaska Region website at
https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie
Scheurer, 907–586–7356.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
International Pacific Halibut
Commission (IPHC) and NMFS manage
fishing for Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus
stenolepis) through regulations
established under the authority of the
Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982
(Halibut Act). The IPHC promulgates
regulations governing the halibut fishery
under the Convention between the
United States and Canada for the
Preservation of the Halibut Fishery of
the Northern Pacific Ocean and Bering
Sea (Convention). The IPHC(s
regulations are subject to approval by
the Secretary of State with concurrence
from the Secretary of Commerce
(Secretary). After approval by the
Secretaries of State and Commerce, the
IPHC regulations are published in the
Federal Register as annual management
measures pursuant to 50 CFR 300.62
(March 7, 2008; 73 FR 12280).
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The Halibut Act also provides
regulatory authority to the North Pacific
Fishery Management Council (Council)
and the Secretary. The Council, under
16 U.S.C. 773c(c), may develop
regulations applicable to U.S. nationals
or vessels, which are in addition to, and
not in conflict with regulations adopted
by the IPHC. The regulations developed
by the Council shall only be
implemented with the approval of the
Secretary, and must meet criteria
outlined in section 773c(c), including
consistency with 16 U.S.C. 1853(b)(6).
The Secretary, under 16 U.S.C. 773c(a)
and (b), has the general responsibility to
carry out the Convention and Halibut
Act. According to section 773c(b), ‘‘In
fulfilling [the general responsibility to
carry out the Convention and the
Halibut Act], the Secretary shall, in
consultation with the Secretary of the
department in which the Coast Guard is
operating, adopt such regulations as
may be necessary to carry out the
purposes and objectives of the
Convention and [the Halibut Act].’’ The
Secretary’s authority to take action
under the Halibut Act has been
delegated to NMFS.
NMFS takes this action under section
773c(b) to adopt such regulations as
may be necessary to carry out the
purposes and objectives of the
Convention and the Halibut Act. This
action would implement, among other
measures, a one halibut daily bag limit
on charter vessel anglers in IPHC Area
2C. This bag limit originally was
recommended by the Council in June
2007, implemented by NMFS by final
rule on May 28, 2008, with an effective
date of June 1, 2008 (73 FR 30504). The
May 28, 2008, final rule was enjoined by
the U.S. District Court for the District of
Columbia on June 10, 2008, (see Order
Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for a
Temporary Restraining Order (TRO),
dated June 11, 2008, and Order Granting
Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary
Injunction (PI), dated June 19, 2008,
Van Valin, et al. v. Gutierrez, Civil
Action No. 1:08–cv–941). NMFS has
withdrawn the May 28, 2008, final rule
that was challenged in the Van Valin
lawsuit, and now takes action in a
separate rulemaking to implement a one
halibut daily bag limit, giving effect to
the Council’s intent to keep the harvest
of charter vessel anglers to
approximately the established guideline
harvest level (GHL).
In its Order Granting the Plaintiffs’
Motion for a Preliminary Injunction,
dated June 19, 2007, the U.S. District
Court determined that the Plaintiffs had
met the burden for granting a
preliminary injunction, including
demonstrating a likelihood of success
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 246 / Monday, December 22, 2008 / Proposed Rules
on the merits of their claims. The
Plaintiffs argued that NMFS, by
referencing the 2003 GHL rule (68 FR
47256, August 8, 2003) in the May 28,
2008, final rule, bound itself to use
certain procedures described in the
preamble to the 2003 GHL rule,
including the requirement that a GHL
had to be exceeded in order for
management measures to be
implemented. NMFS now proposes
regulations to specifically repudiate
such a ‘‘policy’’ and, under sections
773c(a) and (b), proposes new
regulations that are necessary to carry
out the purposes and objectives of the
Convention and the Halibut Act and
that will clarify NMFS’ regulatory
authority.
The preamble to the 1979 Protocol
Amending the Convention provides that
‘‘the Convention has served to promote
and coordinate scientific studies
relating to the halibut fishery of the
Northern Pacific Ocean and the Bering
Sea, and has aided in the conservation
of these fishery resources.’’ Management
based on the best available science and
conservation of the species are purposes
and objectives that are familiar to NMFS
in its role as resources manager. As
such, NMFS proposes regulations to
reduce the harvest of halibut by charter
vessel anglers to one halibut per
calendar day in order to limit the overall
harvest of halibut by charter anglers in
IPHC Area 2C to approximately the
GHL. The GHL in IPHC Area 2C
currently is 931,000 lb (422.3 mt).
As stated above, this action by NMFS
is consistent with the Council’s intent to
limit the catch to the GHL. As recently
as October 2008, when the Council was
taking final action on the Catch Sharing
Plan (CSP) for halibut between the
charter and commercial sectors in IPHC
Areas 2C and 3A, the Council reaffirmed
its intent for a one halibut bag limit in
IPHC Area 2C in order to limit the
harvest of halibut by charter anglers in
IPHC Area 2C to approximately the
GHL. This intent was further confirmed
in a letter from Chris Oliver, Executive
Director, Council, to Dr. Bruce Leaman,
Executive Director, IPHC. The letter,
which was informing the IPHC that the
Council approved a catch sharing plan
for the guided sport and commercial
halibut fisheries in IPHC Areas 2C and
3A, also provided that ‘‘[t]he Council
reiterated its support of its previous
recommendation for a one–fish bag limit
in Area 2C.’’ It is important to note that
management under the Council–
approved CSP, if approved by NMFS,
would require a one halibut daily bag
limit under current halibut abundance
levels. Therefore, a one halibut daily bag
limit is consistent with the past
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Dec 19, 2008
Jkt 217001
management recommendation and the
future management proposal of the
Council.
This action by NMFS is also
consistent with its authority under 16
U.S.C. 773c(a) and (b) to adopt such
regulations as may be necessary to carry
out the purposes and objectives of the
Convention and the Halibut Act. This
action addresses conservation of the
resource, by restricting catch to
approximately the GHL, so that the
IPHC’s projected harvest of halibut by
charter anglers, which is assumed by the
IPHC to equal the GHL, adequately
reflects actual catches for purposes of
managing sustainable removals of the
halibut resource. This action also
addresses an allocation of halibut
fishing privileges among various U.S.
fishermen, by giving effect to a Council
recommendation on how to assign such
privileges consistent with the criteria
found in section 773c(c).
Management of the Halibut Fisheries
The harvest of halibut occurs in three
basic fisheries(the commercial, sport,
and subsistence fisheries. Additional
fishing mortality occurs as bycatch,
incidental catch, research catch, and
wastage. Charter fishing for halibut in
Alaska is managed as part of the sport
fishery.
Based on a coastwide population
model, the IPHC annually determines
the amount of halibut that may be
removed from the resource without
causing biological conservation
problems in all areas of Convention
waters. In areas in and off of Alaska, the
IPHC currently imposes catch limits
only on the commercial sector. The
IPHC estimates the exploitable biomass
of halibut using a combination of
harvest data from the commercial,
recreational, subsistence fisheries, and
information collected during scientific
surveys and sampling of bycatch in
other fisheries. The target amount of
allowable harvest for a given area is
calculated by multiplying a fixed
harvest rate by the estimate of
exploitable biomass. This target level is
called the total constant exploitation
yield (CEY) as it represents the target
level for total removals (in net pounds)
for that area in the coming year. The
IPHC subtracts estimates of all non–
commercial removals (sport,
subsistence, bycatch, and wastage) from
the total CEY. The remaining CEY, after
the removals are subtracted, is the
(fishery CEY( for an area(s directed
commercial fixed gear fishery.
This method of determining the
commercial fishery(s catch limit in an
area results in a decrease in the
commercial fishery(s use of the resource
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78277
as other non–commercial uses increase
their proportion of the total CEY. As
conservation of the halibut resource is
the overarching goal of the IPHC, it
attempts to include all sources of fishing
mortality of halibut within the total
CEY. This method for determining the
limit for the commercial use of halibut
has worked well for many years to
conserve the halibut resource, provided
that the other non–commercial uses of
the resource have remained relatively
stable and small. Although most of the
non–commercial uses of halibut have
been relatively stable, growth in the
guided sport charter vessel fishery in
recent years, particularly in Area 2C,
has resulted in the guided sport charter
vessel fishery harvesting a larger
amount of halibut, thereby reducing the
amount available to the commercial
fishery.
Guideline Harvest Level (GHL)
The guideline harvest level for Area
2C serves as a benchmark for monitoring
the charter vessel fishery relative to the
commercial fishery and other sources of
fishing mortality. The GHL does not
limit the charter vessel fisheries.
Although it is the Council(s policy that
the charter vessel fisheries should not
exceed the GHLs, the GHL in Area 2C
has been exceeded each year since 2004.
Charter removals should be close to the
GHL or the overall harvest strategy of
the IPHC is undermined, creating a
conservation concern and resulting in a
de facto reallocation from the
commercial sector.
From 2003–2007, the GHL for Area 2C
was 1.432 million lb. In 2008, the IPHC
reduced the CEY to 6.5 million lb
(2,948.4 mt) from the 2007 CEY of 10.8
million lb (4,899.0 mt). This was a
reduction of 4.3 million lb (1,950.4 mt)
from the 2007 CEY. The reduction in the
CEY triggered a reduction of the Area 2C
GHL from 1.432 million lb (649.5 mt) to
931,000 lb (422.3 mt) for 2008.
Recent Harvests of Halibut in Area 2C
In Area 2C, the commercial, sport,
and other harvest of halibut over the
past 11 years (1997 through 2007) has
been estimated by the IPHC to average
about 12.215 million lb (5,540.6 mt) per
year. Of this annual average total
removal from the halibut resource, the
commercial fishery accounts for about
75.9 percent, the sport fishery (guided
and unguided combined) accounts for
about 19.6 percent, and the remaining
4.5 percent may be attributed to
subsistence, bycatch, and wastage
combined. Estimates of the subsistence
harvest of halibut were made based on
surveys conducted by the Alaska
Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G)
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
78278
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 246 / Monday, December 22, 2008 / Proposed Rules
during the past three years and average
about 600,000 lb (272.2 mt) per year.
In the most recent three years (2005
through 2007), the average annual total
halibut removals in Area 2C is 13.342
million lb (6,051.8 mt) of which the
commercial fishery has taken about 73
percent, the sport fishery has taken
about 21 percent, and about 6 percent is
from other sources of halibut mortality.
The commercial fishery is the primary
user of the halibut resource in Area 2C
followed by the sport fishery, which
together account for over 90 percent of
the total removals from the halibut
resource.
In Area 2C, the sport fishery is
comprised of guided fishing on charter
vessels and unguided angling. Residents
of Southeast Alaska and their family
and friends are the primary unguided
anglers, while non–resident tourists are
the main clients for guided fishing on
charter vessels. Sport harvest data
collected by ADF&G show that the 1995
through 2007 average guided sport
harvest of halibut has been 1.398
million lb (634.1 mt) per year and the
unguided sport harvest of halibut has
averaged 0.928 million lb (420.9 mt) per
year. Guided charter vessel harvest
averaged about 60 percent of all sport
caught halibut landed in Southeast
Alaska over this 13-year period. The
guided sport harvest has increased its
proportion of the sport harvest in recent
years. From 2002 through 2007, the
annual guided sport charter vessel
harvest averaged 64.6 percent of the
total sport harvest of halibut in Area 2C,
and in 2005 reached a record 71.4
percent of the total sport harvest (Table
1).
Currently, the federal harvest
restrictions implemented to reduce
charter vessel harvest of halibut in Area
2C include the following:
• Halibut harvest on a charter vessel is
limited to no more than two halibut per
person per calendar day provided that at
least one of the harvested halibut has a
head–on length of no more than 32
inches (81.3 cm).
• If a person sport fishing on a charter
vessel in Area 2C retains only one
halibut in a calendar day, that halibut
may be of any length.
In addition, the nonguided sport
fishery for halibut is limited to a two
halibut daily bag limit with no size
restriction on either fish. Under these
restrictions, the total Area 2C harvest of
halibut by the sport fishery in 2007 was
3.049 million lb (1,383.0 mt), based on
final ADF&G sport harvest estimates
reported in September 2008. Of this
amount, the charter fishery harvested
1.918 million lb (870.0 mt) or 63 percent
and the unguided harvest was 1.131
million lb (513.0 mt) or 37 percent.
Charter harvest exceeded the 2007 Area
2C GHL of 1.432 million lb by 486,000
lb (220.4 mt) or 34 percent (Table 1).
Harvest estimates are not yet available
for 2008. Assuming similar harvest
patterns in 2008 as in 2007, the charter
vessel harvest may be near double the
2008 GHL of 931,000 lb (422.3 mt).
TABLE 1. GUIDED AND UNGUIDED SPORT HARVEST BY YEAR IN AREA 2C IN MILLIONS OF POUNDS (MLB) AND AS A
PERCENTAGE OF EACH YEAR’S GHL
GHL (Mlb)
Unguided Sport Harvest (Mlb)
Charter Harvest
(Mlb)
Total Sport Harvest (Mlb)
Charter harvest
as percentage of
GHL
Charter harvest
as percentage of
total sport harvest
2002
n/a
0.814
1.275
2.089
n/a
61.0 %
2003
1.432
0.846
1.412
2.258
98.6 %
62.5 %
2004
1.432
1.187
1.750
2.937
122.2 %
59.6 %
2005
1.432
0.845
1.952
2.797
136.3 %
69.8 %
2006
1.432
0.723
1.804
2.527
126.0 %
71.4 %
2007
1.432
1.131
1.918
3.049
133.9 %
62.9 %
2008
0.931
1.131*
1.918*
n/a
206.0 %
n/a
Year
*based
on estimate of similar harvest rates as 2007
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Proposed Action
Consistent with a recommendation by
the Council in June 2007, this action
proposes the following management
measures to reduce the charter vessel
fishery harvest of halibut in Area 2C to
approximately the GHL of 931,000 lb
(422.3 mt). If implemented, the
proposed regulations would remain in
effect until changed by a new federal
regulatory action.
• The number of halibut caught and
retained by each charter vessel angler in
Area 2C is limited to no more than one
halibut per calendar day;
• A charter vessel guide, a charter
vessel operator, and crew of a charter
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Dec 19, 2008
Jkt 217001
vessel must not catch and retain halibut
during a charter fishing trip; and
• The number of lines used to fish for
halibut must not exceed six or the
number of charter vessel anglers
onboard the charter vessel, whichever is
less.
One–fish daily bag limit. This
restriction would substitute a daily
catch limit for a charter vessel angler of
one halibut per day of any size for the
existing daily catch limit of two halibut
per day with one of the two fish less
than 32 inches (81.3 cm) in length. This
is the only management option analyzed
that is expected to reduce charter vessel
harvest to the GHL of 931,000 lb. In
conjunction with the proposed
restrictions on harvest by skipper and
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
crew and line limits, the one–fish daily
bag limit is estimated to reduce the
charter vessel harvest to a range of 129
percent to 161 percent of the current
Area 2C GHL. The one–fish daily bag
limit is not expected to reduce charter
harvest to below the current GHL
without a concurrent reduction in client
demand for charter trips.
No harvest by skipper and crew. A
new Federal restriction is proposed
prohibiting the harvest of halibut by a
charter vessel guide, a charter vessel
operator, and a charter vessel crew
member during a charter vessel fishing
trip. The language of the June 2007
Council(s motion adopting this
recommendation reads, (no harvest by
skipper and crew when clients are on
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 246 / Monday, December 22, 2008 / Proposed Rules
board the charter vessel.( Although a
sport fishing guide on a charter vessel
in Area 2C is likely to be the same
person as the (skipper,( captain, or
operator of the vessel, in some cases the
skipper and guide could be different
persons. Hence, this proposed rule
makes clear the Council(s intent of
applying this restriction to all
persons(guide, skipper or operator, and
crew(involved with the delivery of
onboard services to the charter vessel
angler.
The proposed regulation deviates
from the Council(s adopted motion
language also in that the phrase (when
clients are on board( is not used in the
proposed regulation. Instead, the
proposed regulation would limit the
skipper and crew harvesting prohibition
to a charter vessel fishing trip. A new
definition is proposed in this action for
(charter vessel fishing trip( which
describes the period from the first
deployment of fishing gear from a
charter vessel until the offloading of any
charter vessel angler or halibut. Also, an
existing definition of (charter vessel( (at
§ 300.61) describes such a vessel as one
(used for hire in sport fishing for
halibut, but not including a vessel
without a hired operator.( Hence, the
effect of the proposed regulation would
be the same as that intended by the
Council, which is to prohibit retention
of halibut caught by the guide, skipper,
and crew on a charter vessel, but not to
impose this restriction when no clients
or charter vessel anglers are onboard. A
vessel without clients or paying anglers
onboard is, by definition, not a charter
vessel. Therefore, guides, skippers, and
crew would not be prevented from sport
fishing for halibut for themselves when
they are not on a charter vessel fishing
trip.
The Council recommended this
restriction to make it more specific to
halibut harvest on charter vessels in
Area 2C. The State Commissioner of the
ADF&G (Commissioner) issued an
emergency order prohibiting the
retention of all fish by the skipper and
crew of a charter vessel in Area 2C in
2007. The Commissioner could not
make his emergency order apply only to
halibut because the State of Alaska is
not authorized to directly regulate
halibut fishing. A comprehensive
application of the emergency order to all
fish effectively prevented charter vessel
skippers and crews from harvest of
salmon, rockfish, lingcod, and other
species. Charter vessel operators
requested relief from this
comprehensive prohibition on skipper
and crew harvests by having a Federal
prohibition on skipper and crew harvest
apply only to halibut. Assuming that the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Dec 19, 2008
Jkt 217001
Commissioner does not issue an
emergency order prohibiting skipper
crew and harvest, this action would
relieve charter vessel skippers and crew
from the more comprehensive
prohibition against retention of all fish
on charter vessels but would impose
this prohibition on the retention of
halibut.
Line limits. A new Federal restriction
is proposed that would limit the number
of lines that could be fished from a
charter vessel to six or the number of
charter vessel anglers onboard the
charter vessel, whichever is less. The
existing IPHC gear limitation for a
person sport fishing for halibut is a
single line with no more than two hooks
attached, or a spear (IPHC regulation,
section 25(1) at 73 FR 12289). Hence,
this restriction would prevent more than
six charter vessel anglers on a vessel
from fishing at the same time. This
restriction is reasonable, however,
because the charter vessels and charter
vessel skippers in Southeast Alaska
(Area 2C) typically are licensed by the
U.S. Coast Guard to carry no more than
six passengers. In addition, existing
State of Alaska regulations (at 5 AAC
47.030(b)) limit the number of lines
fished from a charter vessel generally to
the number of clients onboard the
vessel. A six–line limit for Area 2C has
been in Alaska regulations since 1983,
and limiting the number of lines fished
to the number of clients onboard has
been a requirement since 1997. The
proposed line limits in Federal
regulations would be specifically for
halibut fishing.
Remove carcass retention provision.
NMFS proposes to remove existing
requirements for the retention of halibut
carcasses. To help enforce the two–fish
daily bag limit with size restrictions that
went into place in Area 2C in 2007,
NMFS prohibited mutilating or
otherwise disfiguring a halibut carcass
such that the head–on length could not
be determined. This requirement to
retain carcasses would no longer be
necessary with a one–fish daily bag
limit and would be removed from
regulations at § 300.66(m). The IPHC
adopted new standards in 2008 that
were published in the annual
management measures on March 7, 2008
(73 FR 12280). The new IPHC
requirement for Alaska is: ‘‘no person
shall possess onboard a fishing vessel,
including charter vessels and pleasure
craft, halibut that have been filleted,
mutilated, or otherwise disfigured in
any manner except that each halibut
may be cut into no more than two
ventral and two dorsal pieces, and two
cheeks, all with skin on.’’ This change
allows enforcement officers to count the
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78279
number of fish in possession by an
angler, and is not addressed as a
provision of this proposed rule.
Other proposed changes. NMFS
proposes changes to § 300.65(c)(2) and
(3) to clarify its authority to limit charter
angler harvest to the GHL. Recent
litigation highlighted that these
regulations must be changed to clarify
that NMFS has the authority to take
action at any time to limit the charter
angler catch to the GHL. A new
prohibition (p) would be added to
§ 300.66 to ensure that charter vessel
operators, guides, anglers, and crew
members provide necessary
documentation upon the request of an
authorized officer. This documentation
may include valid identification, U.S.
Coast Guard operator’s license, permit,
ADF&G sport fishing license, or ADF&G
Saltwater Sport Fishing Charter Trip
Logbook.
One definition is proposed to be
revised (guideline harvest level) and
seven definitions are proposed to be
added (Area 3A, charter vessel angler,
charter vessel fishing trip, charter vessel
guide, charter vessel operator, crew
member, and sport fishing guide
services) to define guided sport fishing
activities and are intended to clarify
who may and may not catch and retain
halibut and who is responsible for
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements in § 300.65(d).
Recordkeeping and Reporting
Charter vessel operators would use
the ADF&G Saltwater Sport Fishing
Charter Trip Logbook to record the
information needed to enforce the
proposed one–fish daily bag limit.
Logbook data sheets would be required
to be submitted to the appropriate
ADF&G office according to the time
schedule described in the instructions at
the beginning of the logbook.
The following recordkeeping and
recording information would be
required to enforce this proposed rule:
charter vessel business owner license
number, charter vessel guide license
number, date, regulatory area fished,
angler sport fishing license number and
printed name, number of halibut
retained, charter vessel guide signature,
and charter vessel angler signature.
Additionally, for charter vessels fishing
for halibut in both Areas 2C and 3A in
a single trip, separate logbook data
sheets would be required for each area
if halibut are caught and retained.
Charter vessel guides would continue
to be required to complete the Alaska
Department of Fish and Game Saltwater
Sport Fishing Charter Trip Logbook and
charter vessel anglers would sign the
logbook at the end of a fishing trip to
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
78280
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 246 / Monday, December 22, 2008 / Proposed Rules
acknowledge that the angler–specific
information recorded is correct. These
collection–of–information requirements
were reviewed under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) and were
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget under Control Number
0648–0575.
Potential Future Management Actions
This proposed action is intended to
reduce charter vessel harvests of halibut
to close to the GHL until a longer–term
solution can be reached. Since the
Council made its recommendation in
June 2007, it subsequently adopted two
additional management programs for the
charter fishery in Areas 2C and 3A. The
first program would implement a
limited entry program for charter vessel
businesses and associated vessels. The
second program, the CSP, would
implement new target harvest objectives
for the charter fishery and associated
management measures. It is important to
note that management under the
Council–approved CSP, if approved by
NMFS, would require a one–fish bag
limit under current halibut abundance
levels. NMFS has not yet published a
proposed rule for public review and
comment for either of these proposed
programs.
Classification
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Flexibility Act
An Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as
required by section 603 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The IRFA
describes the economic impact that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would have
on directly regulated small entities. A
copy of this analysis is available from
NMFS (see ADDRESSES). A description of
this action, why it is being considered,
and the legal basis for this action are
discussed in the preamble above. The
proposed action would implement a
one–fish daily bag limit for the charter
vessel halibut fishery in Area 2C. A
summary of the analysis follows.
In 2007, 403 businesses operated 724
active charter vessels in Area 2C. All of
these operations are assumed to be
small entities, with annual gross
revenues of less than the limit of $7.0
million used to differentiate between
large and small charter operations. The
largest companies involved in the
fishery, lodges or resorts that offer
accommodations as well as an
assortment of visitor activities, may be
large entities under the Small Business
Administration size standard, but it is
also possible that all the entities
involved in the charter vessel halibut of
harvest have grossed less than this
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Dec 19, 2008
Jkt 217001
amount. The number of small entities
may be overestimated because of the
limited information on vessel
ownership and operator revenues and
operational affiliations. However, it is
likely that nearly all entities qualify as
small businesses and for purposes of
this analysis, all entities were assumed
to be small entities.
This analysis examined two
alternatives, the status quo and the
preferred alternative. The objective of
this action is to reduce the guided sport
harvest to approximately the GHL. The
status quo alternative was introduced in
2007 with the intent of reducing halibut
harvest in the charter vessel sector
while minimizing negative impacts on
the charter vessel sector, its sport
fishing clients, and the coastal
communities that serve as home ports
for the charter vessel sector. The status
quo would retain the two–fish bag limit
with one of the two fish less than or
equal to 32 inches (83.1 cm) in length,
without changes. Under the status quo,
both the number of charter customers
and the volume of fish harvested rose to
their highest recorded levels. In 2007,
the GHL was 1.432 Mlb. Since that time
reductions in the Total CEY in Area 2C
have led to a reduction in the GHL to
0.931 Mlb. The 2007 harvest was more
than double this GHL and is not
expected to decline if the bag limit
remains the same. Thus, the status quo
would not achieve the objective of this
action.
Seven management measures,
combined into 11 specific options, were
considered for this analysis, but were
ultimately rejected without being
subjected to detailed analysis. These
measures were analyzed for the final
rule published by the Secretary on May
28, 2008 (73 FR 30504), but prevented
from taking effect in 2008 by the Federal
Court’s injunction. These alternatives
were thoroughly analyzed at that time,
and were rejected by the Council and
Secretary for a number of reasons;
primarily because none of these
alternatives would reduce the guided
charter halibut harvest to approximately
the GHL. Additional reasons for
rejecting these alternatives included 1)
the economic effect of an option falling
on too few businesses; 2) the option
being easily diluted by changes in
angler behavior; and 3) the difficulty in
measuring large fish before bringing
them onboard vessels.
The preferred alternative would
implement a one–fish daily bag limit for
charter vessel anglers, a prohibition on
harvest by charter vessel guides,
operators, and crew, and a maximum
six–line limit. A range of harvest results
are possible under the preferred
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
alternative. At current demand levels it
is estimated to reduce the harvest in the
guided sport fishery to between 129
percent and 161 percent of the 0.931
Mlb GHL, and, under certain
assumptions outlined in the analysis
about changes in demand, it may reduce
the harvest to the GHL. Thus, this
alternative is capable of achieving the
objective of this action. Although the
status quo would have a smaller impact
on directly regulated small entities, it
would not achieve the objectives of this
action. The preferred alternative would
minimize the impacts on small entities
and best meet the management objective
of restricting the charter vessel harvest
of halibut to as close to the GHL as
management measures will allow.
NMFS earlier considered additional
alternatives to achieve the objectives of
this action in 2007 and 2008. These
alternatives were analyzed in the April
2008 Environmental Assessment/
Regulatory Impact Review/Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for a
Regulatory Amendment to Implement
Guideline Harvest Level Measures in the
Halibut Charter Fisheries in
International Pacific Halibut
Commission Regulatory Area 2C (see
ADDRESSES for availability). This earlier
analysis found that only the preferred
alternative, the one–halibut bag limit,
was capable of achieving the objectives
of this action. The current analysis
reached a similar conclusion.
Collection of Information
The proposed action imposes new
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements on the directly regulated
small entities. The Council, NMFS, and
ADF&G stressed the importance of
minimizing reporting burden on the
charter vessel industry and developed a
proposed information collection
program that would allow for the
recording of necessary information in
the existing ADF&G Saltwater Sport
Fishing Charter Trip Logbook (logbook).
The new logbook information that
would be required to be provided for
this proposed action includes the
regulatory area in which halibut were
caught and kept during the fishing trip,
the printed name of the charter vessel
angler, including youth anglers under
16 years of age, and the signature of the
angler on the back of the logbook sheet
to verify that the number of halibut
caught and recorded is accurate.
As currently required by the State, the
charter vessel guide also would be
required under the proposed regulations
to provide 1) the business license
number issued by ADF&G, 2) the charter
vessel guide license number issued by
ADF&G, 3) the date the charter vessel
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 246 / Monday, December 22, 2008 / Proposed Rules
fishing trip was taken, 4) the Alaska
Sport Fishing License number of each
charter vessel angler, and 5) the number
of halibut retained. At the end of each
fishing trip, each charter vessel guide
would be required to acknowledge that
the information recorded in the logbook
is correct by signing the logbook data
sheet.
This collection of information
requirement is subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) and has been
approved by OMB under Control
Number 0648–0575. The public
reporting burden for charter vessel
guide respondents to fill out and submit
logbook data sheets is estimated to
average four minutes per response. The
public reporting burden for charter
vessel anglers to sign the logbook is
estimated to be one minute per
response. These estimates include the
time required for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information. The total
public reporting burden for this
collection is estimated at 3,134 hours.
The professional skill that is necessary
for each charter vessel guide to record
the required logbook information vessel
is the ability to read and write in
English.
Send comments regarding this burden
estimate, or any other aspect of this data
collection, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to NMFS (see
ADDRESSES) and by e–mail to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to
202–395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, and no person shall be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
Protocol Amending the Convention,
signed at Washington March 29, 1979
(Convention), and the Northern Pacific
Halibut Act of 1982 (Halibut Act), and
the authority to adopt such regulations
as may be necessary to carry out the
purposes and goals of the Convention
and the Halibut Act.
According to the legislative history of
the Halibut Act (Public Law 97–176,
1982 U.S. Code Cong. and Adm. News,
p. 108), the purpose of the Halibut Act
‘‘is to amend U.S. law so that it will
conform with the agreements made by
the United States with Canada
concerning the halibut fishery of the
Northern Pacific Ocean and Bering
Sea.’’
The agreements made by the United
States with Canada are integrated into
the Convention. The Convention
provides that:
Nationals and fishing vessels of, and fishing
vessels licensed by, Canada or the United
States may fish for halibut in Convention
waters only in accordance with this
Convention, including its Annex, and as
provided by the International Pacific Halibut
Commission in regulations promulgated
pursuant to Article III of the Convention and
designed to develop stocks of halibut in
Convention waters to those levels which
permit the optimum yield from the fishery
and to maintain the stocks at those levels.
However, it is understood that nothing
contained in this convention shall prohibit
either party from establishing additional
regulations, applicable to its own nationals
and fishing vessels, and to fishing licensed
by that party, governing the taking of halibut
which are more restrictive than those
adopted by the International Pacific Halibut
Commission.
Convention waters are defined as:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order (E.O.)
12866.
[T]he waters off the west coasts of Canada
and the United States, including the southern
as well as the western coasts of Alaska,
within the respective maritime areas in
which either Party exercises exclusive
fisheries jurisdiction. For purposes of this
Convention, the ‘‘maritime area’’ in which a
Party exercises exclusive fisheries
jurisdiction includes without distinction
areas within and seaward of the territorial sea
or internal waters of the Party.
Halibut Act
NMFS, through delegated authority
from the Secretary of Commerce, is
proposing this action under 16 U.S.C.
773c(a) and (b). This statutory provision
provides NMFS with the general
responsibility to carry out the
Convention between the United States
of America and Canada for the
Preservation of the Halibut Fishery of
the Northern Pacific Ocean and the
Bering Sea, signed at Ottawa, Canada on
March 2, 1953, as amended by the
As outlined above, one of the
Convention’s primary purposes and
goals is ‘‘to develop stocks of halibut in
Convention waters to those levels which
permit the optimum yield from the
fishery and to maintain the stocks at
those levels.’’ This overarching purpose
and goal is the primary concern of
NMFS for this fishery. Optimum yield
for a fishery is designed to provide the
greatest overall benefit to the Nation,
particularly with respect to food
production and recreational
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Dec 19, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78281
opportunities, and is proscribed as such
on the basis of the maximum
sustainable yield from that fishery, as
reduced by any relevant economic,
social, or ecological factors.
At its annual meeting in January 2007,
the IPHC adopted a motion to
recommend reducing the daily bag limit
for charter vessel anglers in Area 2C
from two halibut to one halibut during
certain time periods (June 15 – July 30)
because it believed its management
goals were at risk by the magnitude of
charter halibut harvest in excess of the
GHL. At that time, the IPHC had
information that the GHL had been
exceeded in 2004 and 2005, and most
likely had been exceeded in 2006. The
IPHC took this action reluctantly,
indicating that its preference would be
for domestic agencies to resolve
allocation issues. The IPHC delayed the
effective date of the reduced bag limit to
afford NMFS time to resolve the issue
under U.S. domestic law with
regulations that would achieve
‘‘comparable reductions’’ in halibut
harvest by charter vessel anglers in Area
2C.
In order to have an effective action in
2007, NMFS took action under section
773c(a) and (b), independent of the
Council process. Rather than imposing a
one halibut limit for certain portions of
the season, as proposed by the IPHC,
NMFS employed other management
measures (daily bag limit of one halibut
of any size and one halibut 32 inches or
less) it determined would reduce sport
fishing mortality of halibut to a level
comparable to the level that would have
been achieved by the proposed IPHC
regulations. Note that this was not the
same as reducing the catch to the GHL,
which would have required more
restrictive measures. Regulations
implementing the above management
measures were published on June 4,
2007 (72 FR 30714).
During the first half of 2007, the
Council also was considering
management alternatives for the charter
vessel halibut fishery in Area 2C. Unlike
the IPHC and NMFS actions, however,
the Council’s action was designed
specifically to maintain the charter
vessel fishery to its GHL.
Section 773c(c) of the Halibut Act
provides that ‘‘[t]he Regional Fishery
Management Council having authority
for the geographical area concerned [in
this case the North Pacific Fishery
Management Council] may develop
regulations governing the United States
portion of Convention waters, including
limited access regulations, applicable to
nationals or vessels of the United States,
or both, which are in addition to, and
not in conflict with regulations adopted
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
78282
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 246 / Monday, December 22, 2008 / Proposed Rules
by the [International Pacific Halibut]
Commission.’’
The Council, through its authority
under section 773c(c), developed
regulations in June 2007 to limit the
harvest of charter vessel anglers to the
Area 2C GHL specified at 50 CFR
300.65(c). At that time, the Area 2C GHL
was at 1.432 Mlb (649.5 mt); however,
the Council was provided information
that halibut biomass reductions might
reduce the Area 2C GHL in 2008. Given
the information that the GHL might be
reduced, the Council proposed two
options, one option if the Area 2C GHL
remained at 1.432 Mlb (649.5 mt), and
one option if the Area 2C GHL was
reduced. NMFS published a proposed
rule with those two options on
December 31, 2007.
At the time the Council took action in
June 2007, it was aware that charter
anglers had exceeded the Area 2C GHL
in 2004 (22 percent) and 2005 (36
percent), and preliminary estimates
indicated that the 2006 Area 2C GHL
also would be exceeded. Information
provided to the Council in October 2007
indicated that the 2006 Area 2C GHL
was exceeded by 26.5 percent.
In January 2008, the IPHC established
a constant exploitation yield (CEY) that
reduced the GHL to 0.931 Mlb (422.3
mt). This information led NMFS to
publish a final rule on May 28, 2008 (73
FR 30504), with Option B, the option
that was recommended by the Council
and proposed by NMFS if the GHL was
reduced. The final rule implemented a
one halibut daily bag limit along with
several other measures, including no
harvest of halibut by skippers and crew
on a charter vessel and line limits.
Given the 2008 GHL, no other
management measures analyzed by the
Council would have reduced the
projected charter anglers overall catch to
the GHL.
As indicated earlier in this preamble,
the May 28, 2008, final rule was
enjoined by the U.S. District Court for
the District of Columbia on June 10,
2008. The full basis for the lawsuit (Van
Valin, et al. v. Gutierrez, Civil Action
No. 1:08–cv–941) and the injunctive
relief provided by the U.S. District Court
is a matter of public record and will not
be repeated here. However, one
important aspect of the lawsuit is
clarified by this proposed rule.
In Van Valin, the Plaintiffs argued
that NMFS did not have the authority to
impose certain management measures
because it did not follow a procedure as
outlined in the preamble to the 2003
GHL rule. According to the Plaintiffs,
NMFS could not impose management
measures to manage the charter sector to
the GHL until that GHL was exceeded.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Dec 19, 2008
Jkt 217001
This would be true even if previous
GHLs had been exceeded, and the GHL
in place at the time of action was less
than the previous exceeded GHLs (as
was the case in 2008). Although the
result the Plaintiffs advocated could be
read into the rulemaking discussion
found in the preamble to the 2003 GHL
rule, NMFS believes that such a result
would be counter to its responsibility to
manage the halibut resource based on
the best present, as well as past,
information. As such, NMFS
specifically repudiates that policy and
proposes changes to the regulations to
clarify NMFS’ authority to take actions
that are necessary to carry out the
purposes and objectives of the
Convention and the Halibut Act.
NMFS withdrew the May 28, 2008,
rule on September 11, 2008 (73 FR
52795), to ensure that any confusion
that may have occurred because of the
May 28, 2008, rule’s perceived
connection to the statements made in
the preamble to the 2003 GHL rule is
eliminated and to establish a new record
and rationale for action under this
proposed rule. An analysis was
prepared for this action that analyzes
the necessity of taking this action, the
purposes of this action, and the
alternatives evaluated to achieve those
purposes. NMFS considered this
analysis, as well as the Council’s
continued support for its June 2007
recommendation, as evidenced by its
actions and intent at its October 2008
meeting, the impacts of potential future
actions, such as the Catch Sharing Plan
for Areas 2C and 3A and moratorium on
halibut charter businesses
recommended by the Council, and
statements provided by staff of the
Commission concerning halibut stock
management, in proposing this rule.
Executive Order 12962
This proposed action is consistent
with E.O. 12962 which directs Federal
agencies to improve the quantity,
function, sustainable productivity, and
distribution of aquatic resources for
increased recreational fishing
opportunities (to the extent permitted
by law and where practicable.( This E.O.
does not diminish NMFS( responsibility
to address allocation issues, nor does it
require NMFS or the Council to limit
their ability to manage recreational
fisheries. E.O. 12962 provides guidance
to NMFS to improve the potential
productivity of aquatic resources for
recreational fisheries. This proposed
rule does not diminish that productivity
or countermand the intent of E.O.
12962.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
This analysis did not reveal any
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with the proposed action.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 300
Fisheries, Fishing, Treaties.
Dated: December 16, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch III
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 300 as follows:
PART 300—–INTERNATIONAL
FISHERIES REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR
part 300, subpart E, continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773–773k.
2. In § 300.61, add definitions in
alphabetical order for ‘‘Area 3A’’,
‘‘Charter vessel angler’’, ‘‘Charter vessel
fishing trip’’, ‘‘Charter vessel guide’’,
‘‘Charter vessel operator’’, ‘‘Crew
member’’, and ‘‘Sport fishing guide
services’’, and revise the definition for
‘‘Guideline harvest level (GHL)’’ to read
as follows:
§ 300.61
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Area 3A means all waters between
Area 2C and a line extending from the
most northerly point on Cape Aklek
(57°41′15″ N. latitude, 155°35′00″ W.
longitude) to Cape Ikolik (57°17′17″ N.
latitude, 154°47′18″ W. longitude), then
along the Kodiak Island coastline to
Cape Trinity (56°44′50″ N. latitude,
154°08′44″ W. longitude), then 140°
true.
*
*
*
*
*
Charter vessel angler, for purposes of
§ 300.65(d), means a person, paying or
nonpaying, using the services of a
charter vessel guide.
Charter vessel fishing trip, for
purposes of § 300.65(d), means the time
period between the first deployment of
fishing gear into the water from a vessel
after any charter vessel angler is
onboard and the offloading of one or
more charter vessel anglers or any
halibut from that vessel.
Charter vessel guide, for purposes of
§ 300.65(d), means a person who is
required to have an annual sport guide
license issued by the Alaska Department
of Fish and Game, or a person who
provides sport fishing guide services.
Charter vessel operator, for purposes
of § 300.65(d), means the person in
control of the vessel during a charter
vessel fishing trip.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 246 / Monday, December 22, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Crew member, for purposes of
§ 300.65(d), means an assistant,
deckhand, or similar person who works
directly under the supervision of and on
the same vessel as a charter vessel
guide.
*
*
*
*
*
Guideline harvest level (GHL) means
the level of allowable halibut harvest by
the charter vessel fishery.
*
*
*
*
*
Sport fishing guide services, for
purposes of § 300.65(d), means
assistance, for compensation, to a
person who is sport fishing, to take or
attempt to take fish by being onboard a
vessel with such person during any part
of a charter vessel fishing trip. Sport
fishing guide services do not include
services provided by a crew member.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 300.65, revise paragraphs (c)(2)
and (3) and paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
§ 300.65 Catch sharing plan and domestic
management measures in waters in and off
Alaska.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) NMFS will publish a notice in the
Federal Register on an annual basis
announcing the GHL based on the table
in paragraph (c)(1) of this section for
Area 2C and Area 3A for that calendar
year after the Commission establishes
the constant exploitation yield for that
year.
(3) The announced GHLs for Area 2C
and 3A are intended to be the
benchmarks for charter halibut harvest
in those areas for the year in which it
is announced pursuant to paragraph
(c)(2) of this section. NMFS may take
action at any time to limit the charter
halibut harvest to as close to the GHL as
practicable.
(d) Charter vessels in Area 2C and
Area 3A—(1) General requirements—(i)
Logbook submission. Alaska Department
of Fish and Game Saltwater Sport
Fishing Charter Trip Logbook data
sheets must be submitted to the Alaska
Department of Fish and Game, Division
of Sport Fish, 333 Raspberry Road,
Anchorage, AK 99518–1599, and
postmarked no more than seven
calendar days after the end of a charter
vessel fishing trip.
(ii) The charter vessel guide is
responsible for complying with the
reporting requirements of this paragraph
(d). The employer of the charter vessel
guide is responsible for ensuring that
the charter vessel guide complies with
the reporting requirements of this
paragraph (d).
(2) Charter vessels in Area 2C—(i)
Daily bag limit. The number of halibut
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:40 Dec 19, 2008
Jkt 217001
caught and retained by each charter
vessel angler in Area 2C is limited to no
more than one halibut per calendar day.
(ii) Charter vessel guide and crew
restriction. A charter vessel guide, a
charter vessel operator, and any crew
member of a charter vessel must not
catch and retain halibut during a charter
fishing trip.
(iii) Line limit. The number of lines
used to fish for halibut onboard a vessel
must not exceed six or the number of
charter vessel anglers, whichever is less.
(iv) Recordkeeping and reporting
requirements in Area 2C. Each charter
vessel angler and charter vessel guide
onboard a vessel in Area 2C must
comply with the following
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements (see paragraphs
(d)(2)(iv)(A) and (B) of this section):
(A) Charter vessel angler signature
requirement. At the end of a charter
vessel fishing trip, each charter vessel
angler who retains halibut caught in
Area 2C must acknowledge that his or
her information and the number of
halibut retained (kept) are recorded
correctly by signing the back of the
Alaska Department of Fish and Game
Saltwater Sport Fishing Charter Trip
Logbook data sheet on the line number
that corresponds to the angler’s
information on the front of the logbook
data sheet.
(B) Charter vessel guide requirements.
For each charter vessel fishing trip in
Area 2C, the charter vessel guide must
record the following information (see
paragraphs (d)(2)(iv)(B)(1) through (8) of
this section) in the Alaska Department
of Fish and Game Saltwater Sport
Fishing Charter Trip Logbook:
(1) Business owner license number.
The sport fishing operator business
license number issued by the Alaska
Department of Fish and Game to the
charter vessel guide or the charter vessel
guide’s employer.
(2) Guide license number. The Alaska
Department of Fish and Game sport
fishing guide license number held by
charter vessel guide who certified the
logbook data sheet.
(3) Date. Month and day for each
charter vessel fishing trip taken. A
separate logbook data sheet is required
for each charter vessel fishing trip if two
or more trips were taken on the same
day. A separate logbook data sheet is
required for each calendar day that
halibut are caught and retained during
a multi-day trip.
(4) Regulatory area fished. Circle the
regulatory area (Area 2C or Area 3A)
where halibut were caught and retained
during each charter vessel fishing trip.
If halibut were caught and retained in
Area 2C and Area 3A during the same
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78283
charter vessel fishing trip, then a
separate logbook data sheet must be
used to record halibut caught and
retained for each regulatory area.
(5) Angler sport fishing license
number and printed name. Before a
charter vessel fishing trip begins, record
for each charter vessel angler the Alaska
Sport Fishing License number for the
current year, resident permanent license
number, or disabled veteran license
number, and print the name of each
paying and nonpaying charter vessel
angler onboard that will fish for halibut.
Record the name of each angler not
required to have an Alaska Sport
Fishing License or its equivalent.
(6) Number of halibut retained. For
each charter vessel angler, record the
number of halibut caught and retained
during the charter vessel fishing trip.
(7) Signature. At the end of a charter
vessel fishing trip, acknowledge that the
recorded information is correct by
signing the logbook data sheet.
(8) Angler signature. The charter
vessel guide is responsible for ensuring
that charter vessel anglers comply with
the signature requirements at paragraph
(d)(2)(iv)(A) of this section.
(3) Charter vessels in Area 3A. For
each charter vessel fishing trip in Area
3A, the charter vessel guide must record
the regulatory area (Area 2C or Area 3A)
where halibut were caught and retained
by circling the appropriate area in the
Alaska Department of Fish and Game
Saltwater Sport Fishing Charter Trip
Logbook. If halibut were caught and
retained in Area 2C and Area 3A during
the same charter vessel fishing trip, then
a separate logbook data sheet must be
used to record halibut caught and
retained for each regulatory area.
*
*
*
*
*
4. In § 300.66, revise paragraph (m)
and add paragraphs (o), (p), and (q) to
read as follows:
§ 300.66
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) Exceed any of the harvest or gear
limitations specified at § 300.65(d).
*
*
*
*
*
(o) Fail to comply with the
requirements at § 300.65(d).
(p) Fail to submit or submit inaccurate
information on any report, license, catch
card, application or statement required
under § 300.65.
(q) Refuse to present valid
identification, U.S. Coast Guard
operator’s license, permit, license, or
Alaska Department of Fish and Game
Saltwater Sport Fishing Charter Trip
logbook upon the request of an
authorized officer.
[FR Doc. E8–30376 Filed 12–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 246 (Monday, December 22, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 78276-78283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-30376]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 0808061071-81575-01]
RIN 0648-AX17
Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Guided Sport Charter Vessel Fishery
for Halibut
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations that would limit the harvest of
Pacific halibut by guided sport charter vessel anglers in International
Pacific Halibut Commission Regulatory Area 2C (Area 2C) of Southeast
Alaska to one halibut per day. This proposed regulatory change is
necessary to reduce the halibut harvest in the charter vessel sector to
approximately the guideline harvest level for Area 2C. The intended
effect of this action is to manage the harvest of halibut consistent
with an allocation strategy recommended by the North Pacific Management
Council for the guided sport charter vessel fishery and the commercial
fishery.
DATES: Comments must be received no later than January 21, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Sue Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region, NMFS,
Attn: Ellen Sebastian. You may submit comments, identified by ``RIN
0648-AX17'' by any one of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal website at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Mail: P. O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802.
Fax: (907) 586-7557.
Hand delivery to the Federal Building: 709 West 9\th\
Street, Room 420A, Juneau, AK.
All comments received are a part of the public record and will be
posted to https://www.regulations.gov without change. All Personal
Identifying Information (e.g., name, address) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit Confidential
Business Information or otherwise sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter N/A in the required
fields if you wish to remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments must be in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
portable document file (pdf) formats to be accepted.
Copies of the Environmental Assessment (EA), Regulatory Impact
Review (RIR), and Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
prepared for this action may be obtained from NMFS Alaska Region, P.O.
Box 21668, Juneau, Alaska 99802, Attn: Ellen Sebastian, and on the NMFS
Alaska Region website at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Scheurer, 907-586-7356.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The International Pacific Halibut Commission
(IPHC) and NMFS manage fishing for Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus
stenolepis) through regulations established under the authority of the
Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982 (Halibut Act). The IPHC
promulgates regulations governing the halibut fishery under the
Convention between the United States and Canada for the Preservation of
the Halibut Fishery of the Northern Pacific Ocean and Bering Sea
(Convention). The IPHC(s regulations are subject to approval by the
Secretary of State with concurrence from the Secretary of Commerce
(Secretary). After approval by the Secretaries of State and Commerce,
the IPHC regulations are published in the Federal Register as annual
management measures pursuant to 50 CFR 300.62 (March 7, 2008; 73 FR
12280).
The Halibut Act also provides regulatory authority to the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) and the Secretary. The
Council, under 16 U.S.C. 773c(c), may develop regulations applicable to
U.S. nationals or vessels, which are in addition to, and not in
conflict with regulations adopted by the IPHC. The regulations
developed by the Council shall only be implemented with the approval of
the Secretary, and must meet criteria outlined in section 773c(c),
including consistency with 16 U.S.C. 1853(b)(6). The Secretary, under
16 U.S.C. 773c(a) and (b), has the general responsibility to carry out
the Convention and Halibut Act. According to section 773c(b), ``In
fulfilling [the general responsibility to carry out the Convention and
the Halibut Act], the Secretary shall, in consultation with the
Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating,
adopt such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the purposes
and objectives of the Convention and [the Halibut Act].'' The
Secretary's authority to take action under the Halibut Act has been
delegated to NMFS.
NMFS takes this action under section 773c(b) to adopt such
regulations as may be necessary to carry out the purposes and
objectives of the Convention and the Halibut Act. This action would
implement, among other measures, a one halibut daily bag limit on
charter vessel anglers in IPHC Area 2C. This bag limit originally was
recommended by the Council in June 2007, implemented by NMFS by final
rule on May 28, 2008, with an effective date of June 1, 2008 (73 FR
30504). The May 28, 2008, final rule was enjoined by the U.S. District
Court for the District of Columbia on June 10, 2008, (see Order
Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO),
dated June 11, 2008, and Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for a
Preliminary Injunction (PI), dated June 19, 2008, Van Valin, et al. v.
Gutierrez, Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-941). NMFS has withdrawn the May
28, 2008, final rule that was challenged in the Van Valin lawsuit, and
now takes action in a separate rulemaking to implement a one halibut
daily bag limit, giving effect to the Council's intent to keep the
harvest of charter vessel anglers to approximately the established
guideline harvest level (GHL).
In its Order Granting the Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary
Injunction, dated June 19, 2007, the U.S. District Court determined
that the Plaintiffs had met the burden for granting a preliminary
injunction, including demonstrating a likelihood of success
[[Page 78277]]
on the merits of their claims. The Plaintiffs argued that NMFS, by
referencing the 2003 GHL rule (68 FR 47256, August 8, 2003) in the May
28, 2008, final rule, bound itself to use certain procedures described
in the preamble to the 2003 GHL rule, including the requirement that a
GHL had to be exceeded in order for management measures to be
implemented. NMFS now proposes regulations to specifically repudiate
such a ``policy'' and, under sections 773c(a) and (b), proposes new
regulations that are necessary to carry out the purposes and objectives
of the Convention and the Halibut Act and that will clarify NMFS'
regulatory authority.
The preamble to the 1979 Protocol Amending the Convention provides
that ``the Convention has served to promote and coordinate scientific
studies relating to the halibut fishery of the Northern Pacific Ocean
and the Bering Sea, and has aided in the conservation of these fishery
resources.'' Management based on the best available science and
conservation of the species are purposes and objectives that are
familiar to NMFS in its role as resources manager. As such, NMFS
proposes regulations to reduce the harvest of halibut by charter vessel
anglers to one halibut per calendar day in order to limit the overall
harvest of halibut by charter anglers in IPHC Area 2C to approximately
the GHL. The GHL in IPHC Area 2C currently is 931,000 lb (422.3 mt).
As stated above, this action by NMFS is consistent with the
Council's intent to limit the catch to the GHL. As recently as October
2008, when the Council was taking final action on the Catch Sharing
Plan (CSP) for halibut between the charter and commercial sectors in
IPHC Areas 2C and 3A, the Council reaffirmed its intent for a one
halibut bag limit in IPHC Area 2C in order to limit the harvest of
halibut by charter anglers in IPHC Area 2C to approximately the GHL.
This intent was further confirmed in a letter from Chris Oliver,
Executive Director, Council, to Dr. Bruce Leaman, Executive Director,
IPHC. The letter, which was informing the IPHC that the Council
approved a catch sharing plan for the guided sport and commercial
halibut fisheries in IPHC Areas 2C and 3A, also provided that ``[t]he
Council reiterated its support of its previous recommendation for a
one-fish bag limit in Area 2C.'' It is important to note that
management under the Council-approved CSP, if approved by NMFS, would
require a one halibut daily bag limit under current halibut abundance
levels. Therefore, a one halibut daily bag limit is consistent with the
past management recommendation and the future management proposal of
the Council.
This action by NMFS is also consistent with its authority under 16
U.S.C. 773c(a) and (b) to adopt such regulations as may be necessary to
carry out the purposes and objectives of the Convention and the Halibut
Act. This action addresses conservation of the resource, by restricting
catch to approximately the GHL, so that the IPHC's projected harvest of
halibut by charter anglers, which is assumed by the IPHC to equal the
GHL, adequately reflects actual catches for purposes of managing
sustainable removals of the halibut resource. This action also
addresses an allocation of halibut fishing privileges among various
U.S. fishermen, by giving effect to a Council recommendation on how to
assign such privileges consistent with the criteria found in section
773c(c).
Management of the Halibut Fisheries
The harvest of halibut occurs in three basic fisheries(the
commercial, sport, and subsistence fisheries. Additional fishing
mortality occurs as bycatch, incidental catch, research catch, and
wastage. Charter fishing for halibut in Alaska is managed as part of
the sport fishery.
Based on a coastwide population model, the IPHC annually determines
the amount of halibut that may be removed from the resource without
causing biological conservation problems in all areas of Convention
waters. In areas in and off of Alaska, the IPHC currently imposes catch
limits only on the commercial sector. The IPHC estimates the
exploitable biomass of halibut using a combination of harvest data from
the commercial, recreational, subsistence fisheries, and information
collected during scientific surveys and sampling of bycatch in other
fisheries. The target amount of allowable harvest for a given area is
calculated by multiplying a fixed harvest rate by the estimate of
exploitable biomass. This target level is called the total constant
exploitation yield (CEY) as it represents the target level for total
removals (in net pounds) for that area in the coming year. The IPHC
subtracts estimates of all non-commercial removals (sport, subsistence,
bycatch, and wastage) from the total CEY. The remaining CEY, after the
removals are subtracted, is the (fishery CEY( for an area(s directed
commercial fixed gear fishery.
This method of determining the commercial fishery(s catch limit in
an area results in a decrease in the commercial fishery(s use of the
resource as other non-commercial uses increase their proportion of the
total CEY. As conservation of the halibut resource is the overarching
goal of the IPHC, it attempts to include all sources of fishing
mortality of halibut within the total CEY. This method for determining
the limit for the commercial use of halibut has worked well for many
years to conserve the halibut resource, provided that the other non-
commercial uses of the resource have remained relatively stable and
small. Although most of the non-commercial uses of halibut have been
relatively stable, growth in the guided sport charter vessel fishery in
recent years, particularly in Area 2C, has resulted in the guided sport
charter vessel fishery harvesting a larger amount of halibut, thereby
reducing the amount available to the commercial fishery.
Guideline Harvest Level (GHL)
The guideline harvest level for Area 2C serves as a benchmark for
monitoring the charter vessel fishery relative to the commercial
fishery and other sources of fishing mortality. The GHL does not limit
the charter vessel fisheries. Although it is the Council(s policy that
the charter vessel fisheries should not exceed the GHLs, the GHL in
Area 2C has been exceeded each year since 2004. Charter removals should
be close to the GHL or the overall harvest strategy of the IPHC is
undermined, creating a conservation concern and resulting in a de facto
reallocation from the commercial sector.
From 2003-2007, the GHL for Area 2C was 1.432 million lb. In 2008,
the IPHC reduced the CEY to 6.5 million lb (2,948.4 mt) from the 2007
CEY of 10.8 million lb (4,899.0 mt). This was a reduction of 4.3
million lb (1,950.4 mt) from the 2007 CEY. The reduction in the CEY
triggered a reduction of the Area 2C GHL from 1.432 million lb (649.5
mt) to 931,000 lb (422.3 mt) for 2008.
Recent Harvests of Halibut in Area 2C
In Area 2C, the commercial, sport, and other harvest of halibut
over the past 11 years (1997 through 2007) has been estimated by the
IPHC to average about 12.215 million lb (5,540.6 mt) per year. Of this
annual average total removal from the halibut resource, the commercial
fishery accounts for about 75.9 percent, the sport fishery (guided and
unguided combined) accounts for about 19.6 percent, and the remaining
4.5 percent may be attributed to subsistence, bycatch, and wastage
combined. Estimates of the subsistence harvest of halibut were made
based on surveys conducted by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game
(ADF&G)
[[Page 78278]]
during the past three years and average about 600,000 lb (272.2 mt) per
year.
In the most recent three years (2005 through 2007), the average
annual total halibut removals in Area 2C is 13.342 million lb (6,051.8
mt) of which the commercial fishery has taken about 73 percent, the
sport fishery has taken about 21 percent, and about 6 percent is from
other sources of halibut mortality. The commercial fishery is the
primary user of the halibut resource in Area 2C followed by the sport
fishery, which together account for over 90 percent of the total
removals from the halibut resource.
In Area 2C, the sport fishery is comprised of guided fishing on
charter vessels and unguided angling. Residents of Southeast Alaska and
their family and friends are the primary unguided anglers, while non-
resident tourists are the main clients for guided fishing on charter
vessels. Sport harvest data collected by ADF&G show that the 1995
through 2007 average guided sport harvest of halibut has been 1.398
million lb (634.1 mt) per year and the unguided sport harvest of
halibut has averaged 0.928 million lb (420.9 mt) per year. Guided
charter vessel harvest averaged about 60 percent of all sport caught
halibut landed in Southeast Alaska over this 13-year period. The guided
sport harvest has increased its proportion of the sport harvest in
recent years. From 2002 through 2007, the annual guided sport charter
vessel harvest averaged 64.6 percent of the total sport harvest of
halibut in Area 2C, and in 2005 reached a record 71.4 percent of the
total sport harvest (Table 1).
Currently, the federal harvest restrictions implemented to reduce
charter vessel harvest of halibut in Area 2C include the following:
Halibut harvest on a charter vessel is limited to no more
than two halibut per person per calendar day provided that at least one
of the harvested halibut has a head-on length of no more than 32 inches
(81.3 cm).
If a person sport fishing on a charter vessel in Area 2C
retains only one halibut in a calendar day, that halibut may be of any
length.
In addition, the nonguided sport fishery for halibut is limited to
a two halibut daily bag limit with no size restriction on either fish.
Under these restrictions, the total Area 2C harvest of halibut by the
sport fishery in 2007 was 3.049 million lb (1,383.0 mt), based on final
ADF&G sport harvest estimates reported in September 2008. Of this
amount, the charter fishery harvested 1.918 million lb (870.0 mt) or 63
percent and the unguided harvest was 1.131 million lb (513.0 mt) or 37
percent. Charter harvest exceeded the 2007 Area 2C GHL of 1.432 million
lb by 486,000 lb (220.4 mt) or 34 percent (Table 1). Harvest estimates
are not yet available for 2008. Assuming similar harvest patterns in
2008 as in 2007, the charter vessel harvest may be near double the 2008
GHL of 931,000 lb (422.3 mt).
Table 1. Guided and Unguided Sport Harvest by Year in Area 2C in Millions of Pounds (Mlb) and as a Percentage of
Each Year's GHL
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charter harvest
Unguided Sport Charter Total Sport Charter harvest as percentage
Year GHL (Mlb) Harvest (Mlb) Harvest (Mlb) Harvest (Mlb) as percentage of total sport
of GHL harvest
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002 n/a 0.814 1.275 2.089 n/a 61.0 %
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 1.432 0.846 1.412 2.258 98.6 % 62.5 %
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004 1.432 1.187 1.750 2.937 122.2 % 59.6 %
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2005 1.432 0.845 1.952 2.797 136.3 % 69.8 %
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 1.432 0.723 1.804 2.527 126.0 % 71.4 %
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2007 1.432 1.131 1.918 3.049 133.9 % 62.9 %
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2008 0.931 1.131\*\ 1.918\*\ n/a 206.0 % n/a
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\*\based on estimate of similar harvest rates as 2007
Proposed Action
Consistent with a recommendation by the Council in June 2007, this
action proposes the following management measures to reduce the charter
vessel fishery harvest of halibut in Area 2C to approximately the GHL
of 931,000 lb (422.3 mt). If implemented, the proposed regulations
would remain in effect until changed by a new federal regulatory
action.
The number of halibut caught and retained by each charter
vessel angler in Area 2C is limited to no more than one halibut per
calendar day;
A charter vessel guide, a charter vessel operator, and
crew of a charter vessel must not catch and retain halibut during a
charter fishing trip; and
The number of lines used to fish for halibut must not
exceed six or the number of charter vessel anglers onboard the charter
vessel, whichever is less.
One-fish daily bag limit. This restriction would substitute a daily
catch limit for a charter vessel angler of one halibut per day of any
size for the existing daily catch limit of two halibut per day with one
of the two fish less than 32 inches (81.3 cm) in length. This is the
only management option analyzed that is expected to reduce charter
vessel harvest to the GHL of 931,000 lb. In conjunction with the
proposed restrictions on harvest by skipper and crew and line limits,
the one-fish daily bag limit is estimated to reduce the charter vessel
harvest to a range of 129 percent to 161 percent of the current Area 2C
GHL. The one-fish daily bag limit is not expected to reduce charter
harvest to below the current GHL without a concurrent reduction in
client demand for charter trips.
No harvest by skipper and crew. A new Federal restriction is
proposed prohibiting the harvest of halibut by a charter vessel guide,
a charter vessel operator, and a charter vessel crew member during a
charter vessel fishing trip. The language of the June 2007 Council(s
motion adopting this recommendation reads, (no harvest by skipper and
crew when clients are on
[[Page 78279]]
board the charter vessel.( Although a sport fishing guide on a charter
vessel in Area 2C is likely to be the same person as the (skipper,(
captain, or operator of the vessel, in some cases the skipper and guide
could be different persons. Hence, this proposed rule makes clear the
Council(s intent of applying this restriction to all persons(guide,
skipper or operator, and crew(involved with the delivery of onboard
services to the charter vessel angler.
The proposed regulation deviates from the Council(s adopted motion
language also in that the phrase (when clients are on board( is not
used in the proposed regulation. Instead, the proposed regulation would
limit the skipper and crew harvesting prohibition to a charter vessel
fishing trip. A new definition is proposed in this action for (charter
vessel fishing trip( which describes the period from the first
deployment of fishing gear from a charter vessel until the offloading
of any charter vessel angler or halibut. Also, an existing definition
of (charter vessel( (at Sec. 300.61) describes such a vessel as one
(used for hire in sport fishing for halibut, but not including a vessel
without a hired operator.( Hence, the effect of the proposed regulation
would be the same as that intended by the Council, which is to prohibit
retention of halibut caught by the guide, skipper, and crew on a
charter vessel, but not to impose this restriction when no clients or
charter vessel anglers are onboard. A vessel without clients or paying
anglers onboard is, by definition, not a charter vessel. Therefore,
guides, skippers, and crew would not be prevented from sport fishing
for halibut for themselves when they are not on a charter vessel
fishing trip.
The Council recommended this restriction to make it more specific
to halibut harvest on charter vessels in Area 2C. The State
Commissioner of the ADF&G (Commissioner) issued an emergency order
prohibiting the retention of all fish by the skipper and crew of a
charter vessel in Area 2C in 2007. The Commissioner could not make his
emergency order apply only to halibut because the State of Alaska is
not authorized to directly regulate halibut fishing. A comprehensive
application of the emergency order to all fish effectively prevented
charter vessel skippers and crews from harvest of salmon, rockfish,
lingcod, and other species. Charter vessel operators requested relief
from this comprehensive prohibition on skipper and crew harvests by
having a Federal prohibition on skipper and crew harvest apply only to
halibut. Assuming that the Commissioner does not issue an emergency
order prohibiting skipper crew and harvest, this action would relieve
charter vessel skippers and crew from the more comprehensive
prohibition against retention of all fish on charter vessels but would
impose this prohibition on the retention of halibut.
Line limits. A new Federal restriction is proposed that would limit
the number of lines that could be fished from a charter vessel to six
or the number of charter vessel anglers onboard the charter vessel,
whichever is less. The existing IPHC gear limitation for a person sport
fishing for halibut is a single line with no more than two hooks
attached, or a spear (IPHC regulation, section 25(1) at 73 FR 12289).
Hence, this restriction would prevent more than six charter vessel
anglers on a vessel from fishing at the same time. This restriction is
reasonable, however, because the charter vessels and charter vessel
skippers in Southeast Alaska (Area 2C) typically are licensed by the
U.S. Coast Guard to carry no more than six passengers. In addition,
existing State of Alaska regulations (at 5 AAC 47.030(b)) limit the
number of lines fished from a charter vessel generally to the number of
clients onboard the vessel. A six-line limit for Area 2C has been in
Alaska regulations since 1983, and limiting the number of lines fished
to the number of clients onboard has been a requirement since 1997. The
proposed line limits in Federal regulations would be specifically for
halibut fishing.
Remove carcass retention provision. NMFS proposes to remove
existing requirements for the retention of halibut carcasses. To help
enforce the two-fish daily bag limit with size restrictions that went
into place in Area 2C in 2007, NMFS prohibited mutilating or otherwise
disfiguring a halibut carcass such that the head-on length could not be
determined. This requirement to retain carcasses would no longer be
necessary with a one-fish daily bag limit and would be removed from
regulations at Sec. 300.66(m). The IPHC adopted new standards in 2008
that were published in the annual management measures on March 7, 2008
(73 FR 12280). The new IPHC requirement for Alaska is: ``no person
shall possess onboard a fishing vessel, including charter vessels and
pleasure craft, halibut that have been filleted, mutilated, or
otherwise disfigured in any manner except that each halibut may be cut
into no more than two ventral and two dorsal pieces, and two cheeks,
all with skin on.'' This change allows enforcement officers to count
the number of fish in possession by an angler, and is not addressed as
a provision of this proposed rule.
Other proposed changes. NMFS proposes changes to Sec. 300.65(c)(2)
and (3) to clarify its authority to limit charter angler harvest to the
GHL. Recent litigation highlighted that these regulations must be
changed to clarify that NMFS has the authority to take action at any
time to limit the charter angler catch to the GHL. A new prohibition
(p) would be added to Sec. 300.66 to ensure that charter vessel
operators, guides, anglers, and crew members provide necessary
documentation upon the request of an authorized officer. This
documentation may include valid identification, U.S. Coast Guard
operator's license, permit, ADF&G sport fishing license, or ADF&G
Saltwater Sport Fishing Charter Trip Logbook.
One definition is proposed to be revised (guideline harvest level)
and seven definitions are proposed to be added (Area 3A, charter vessel
angler, charter vessel fishing trip, charter vessel guide, charter
vessel operator, crew member, and sport fishing guide services) to
define guided sport fishing activities and are intended to clarify who
may and may not catch and retain halibut and who is responsible for
recordkeeping and reporting requirements in Sec. 300.65(d).
Recordkeeping and Reporting
Charter vessel operators would use the ADF&G Saltwater Sport
Fishing Charter Trip Logbook to record the information needed to
enforce the proposed one-fish daily bag limit. Logbook data sheets
would be required to be submitted to the appropriate ADF&G office
according to the time schedule described in the instructions at the
beginning of the logbook.
The following recordkeeping and recording information would be
required to enforce this proposed rule: charter vessel business owner
license number, charter vessel guide license number, date, regulatory
area fished, angler sport fishing license number and printed name,
number of halibut retained, charter vessel guide signature, and charter
vessel angler signature. Additionally, for charter vessels fishing for
halibut in both Areas 2C and 3A in a single trip, separate logbook data
sheets would be required for each area if halibut are caught and
retained.
Charter vessel guides would continue to be required to complete the
Alaska Department of Fish and Game Saltwater Sport Fishing Charter Trip
Logbook and charter vessel anglers would sign the logbook at the end of
a fishing trip to
[[Page 78280]]
acknowledge that the angler-specific information recorded is correct.
These collection-of-information requirements were reviewed under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) and were approved by the Office of
Management and Budget under Control Number 0648-0575.
Potential Future Management Actions
This proposed action is intended to reduce charter vessel harvests
of halibut to close to the GHL until a longer-term solution can be
reached. Since the Council made its recommendation in June 2007, it
subsequently adopted two additional management programs for the charter
fishery in Areas 2C and 3A. The first program would implement a limited
entry program for charter vessel businesses and associated vessels. The
second program, the CSP, would implement new target harvest objectives
for the charter fishery and associated management measures. It is
important to note that management under the Council-approved CSP, if
approved by NMFS, would require a one-fish bag limit under current
halibut abundance levels. NMFS has not yet published a proposed rule
for public review and comment for either of these proposed programs.
Classification
Regulatory Flexibility Act
An Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as
required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The IRFA
describes the economic impact that this proposed rule, if adopted,
would have on directly regulated small entities. A copy of this
analysis is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES). A description of this
action, why it is being considered, and the legal basis for this action
are discussed in the preamble above. The proposed action would
implement a one-fish daily bag limit for the charter vessel halibut
fishery in Area 2C. A summary of the analysis follows.
In 2007, 403 businesses operated 724 active charter vessels in Area
2C. All of these operations are assumed to be small entities, with
annual gross revenues of less than the limit of $7.0 million used to
differentiate between large and small charter operations. The largest
companies involved in the fishery, lodges or resorts that offer
accommodations as well as an assortment of visitor activities, may be
large entities under the Small Business Administration size standard,
but it is also possible that all the entities involved in the charter
vessel halibut of harvest have grossed less than this amount. The
number of small entities may be overestimated because of the limited
information on vessel ownership and operator revenues and operational
affiliations. However, it is likely that nearly all entities qualify as
small businesses and for purposes of this analysis, all entities were
assumed to be small entities.
This analysis examined two alternatives, the status quo and the
preferred alternative. The objective of this action is to reduce the
guided sport harvest to approximately the GHL. The status quo
alternative was introduced in 2007 with the intent of reducing halibut
harvest in the charter vessel sector while minimizing negative impacts
on the charter vessel sector, its sport fishing clients, and the
coastal communities that serve as home ports for the charter vessel
sector. The status quo would retain the two-fish bag limit with one of
the two fish less than or equal to 32 inches (83.1 cm) in length,
without changes. Under the status quo, both the number of charter
customers and the volume of fish harvested rose to their highest
recorded levels. In 2007, the GHL was 1.432 Mlb. Since that time
reductions in the Total CEY in Area 2C have led to a reduction in the
GHL to 0.931 Mlb. The 2007 harvest was more than double this GHL and is
not expected to decline if the bag limit remains the same. Thus, the
status quo would not achieve the objective of this action.
Seven management measures, combined into 11 specific options, were
considered for this analysis, but were ultimately rejected without
being subjected to detailed analysis. These measures were analyzed for
the final rule published by the Secretary on May 28, 2008 (73 FR
30504), but prevented from taking effect in 2008 by the Federal Court's
injunction. These alternatives were thoroughly analyzed at that time,
and were rejected by the Council and Secretary for a number of reasons;
primarily because none of these alternatives would reduce the guided
charter halibut harvest to approximately the GHL. Additional reasons
for rejecting these alternatives included 1) the economic effect of an
option falling on too few businesses; 2) the option being easily
diluted by changes in angler behavior; and 3) the difficulty in
measuring large fish before bringing them onboard vessels.
The preferred alternative would implement a one-fish daily bag
limit for charter vessel anglers, a prohibition on harvest by charter
vessel guides, operators, and crew, and a maximum six-line limit. A
range of harvest results are possible under the preferred alternative.
At current demand levels it is estimated to reduce the harvest in the
guided sport fishery to between 129 percent and 161 percent of the
0.931 Mlb GHL, and, under certain assumptions outlined in the analysis
about changes in demand, it may reduce the harvest to the GHL. Thus,
this alternative is capable of achieving the objective of this action.
Although the status quo would have a smaller impact on directly
regulated small entities, it would not achieve the objectives of this
action. The preferred alternative would minimize the impacts on small
entities and best meet the management objective of restricting the
charter vessel harvest of halibut to as close to the GHL as management
measures will allow. NMFS earlier considered additional alternatives to
achieve the objectives of this action in 2007 and 2008. These
alternatives were analyzed in the April 2008 Environmental Assessment/
Regulatory Impact Review/Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for a
Regulatory Amendment to Implement Guideline Harvest Level Measures in
the Halibut Charter Fisheries in International Pacific Halibut
Commission Regulatory Area 2C (see ADDRESSES for availability). This
earlier analysis found that only the preferred alternative, the one-
halibut bag limit, was capable of achieving the objectives of this
action. The current analysis reached a similar conclusion.
Collection of Information
The proposed action imposes new recordkeeping and reporting
requirements on the directly regulated small entities. The Council,
NMFS, and ADF&G stressed the importance of minimizing reporting burden
on the charter vessel industry and developed a proposed information
collection program that would allow for the recording of necessary
information in the existing ADF&G Saltwater Sport Fishing Charter Trip
Logbook (logbook).
The new logbook information that would be required to be provided
for this proposed action includes the regulatory area in which halibut
were caught and kept during the fishing trip, the printed name of the
charter vessel angler, including youth anglers under 16 years of age,
and the signature of the angler on the back of the logbook sheet to
verify that the number of halibut caught and recorded is accurate.
As currently required by the State, the charter vessel guide also
would be required under the proposed regulations to provide 1) the
business license number issued by ADF&G, 2) the charter vessel guide
license number issued by ADF&G, 3) the date the charter vessel
[[Page 78281]]
fishing trip was taken, 4) the Alaska Sport Fishing License number of
each charter vessel angler, and 5) the number of halibut retained. At
the end of each fishing trip, each charter vessel guide would be
required to acknowledge that the information recorded in the logbook is
correct by signing the logbook data sheet.
This collection of information requirement is subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) and has been approved by OMB under
Control Number 0648-0575. The public reporting burden for charter
vessel guide respondents to fill out and submit logbook data sheets is
estimated to average four minutes per response. The public reporting
burden for charter vessel anglers to sign the logbook is estimated to
be one minute per response. These estimates include the time required
for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering
and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information. The total public reporting burden for this
collection is estimated at 3,134 hours. The professional skill that is
necessary for each charter vessel guide to record the required logbook
information vessel is the ability to read and write in English.
Send comments regarding this burden estimate, or any other aspect
of this data collection, including suggestions for reducing the burden,
to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and by e-mail to David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or
fax to 202-395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, and no person shall be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866.
Halibut Act
NMFS, through delegated authority from the Secretary of Commerce,
is proposing this action under 16 U.S.C. 773c(a) and (b). This
statutory provision provides NMFS with the general responsibility to
carry out the Convention between the United States of America and
Canada for the Preservation of the Halibut Fishery of the Northern
Pacific Ocean and the Bering Sea, signed at Ottawa, Canada on March 2,
1953, as amended by the Protocol Amending the Convention, signed at
Washington March 29, 1979 (Convention), and the Northern Pacific
Halibut Act of 1982 (Halibut Act), and the authority to adopt such
regulations as may be necessary to carry out the purposes and goals of
the Convention and the Halibut Act.
According to the legislative history of the Halibut Act (Public Law
97-176, 1982 U.S. Code Cong. and Adm. News, p. 108), the purpose of the
Halibut Act ``is to amend U.S. law so that it will conform with the
agreements made by the United States with Canada concerning the halibut
fishery of the Northern Pacific Ocean and Bering Sea.''
The agreements made by the United States with Canada are integrated
into the Convention. The Convention provides that:
Nationals and fishing vessels of, and fishing vessels licensed by,
Canada or the United States may fish for halibut in Convention
waters only in accordance with this Convention, including its Annex,
and as provided by the International Pacific Halibut Commission in
regulations promulgated pursuant to Article III of the Convention
and designed to develop stocks of halibut in Convention waters to
those levels which permit the optimum yield from the fishery and to
maintain the stocks at those levels. However, it is understood that
nothing contained in this convention shall prohibit either party
from establishing additional regulations, applicable to its own
nationals and fishing vessels, and to fishing licensed by that
party, governing the taking of halibut which are more restrictive
than those adopted by the International Pacific Halibut Commission.
Convention waters are defined as:
[T]he waters off the west coasts of Canada and the United States,
including the southern as well as the western coasts of Alaska,
within the respective maritime areas in which either Party exercises
exclusive fisheries jurisdiction. For purposes of this Convention,
the ``maritime area'' in which a Party exercises exclusive fisheries
jurisdiction includes without distinction areas within and seaward
of the territorial sea or internal waters of the Party.
As outlined above, one of the Convention's primary purposes and
goals is ``to develop stocks of halibut in Convention waters to those
levels which permit the optimum yield from the fishery and to maintain
the stocks at those levels.'' This overarching purpose and goal is the
primary concern of NMFS for this fishery. Optimum yield for a fishery
is designed to provide the greatest overall benefit to the Nation,
particularly with respect to food production and recreational
opportunities, and is proscribed as such on the basis of the maximum
sustainable yield from that fishery, as reduced by any relevant
economic, social, or ecological factors.
At its annual meeting in January 2007, the IPHC adopted a motion to
recommend reducing the daily bag limit for charter vessel anglers in
Area 2C from two halibut to one halibut during certain time periods
(June 15 - July 30) because it believed its management goals were at
risk by the magnitude of charter halibut harvest in excess of the GHL.
At that time, the IPHC had information that the GHL had been exceeded
in 2004 and 2005, and most likely had been exceeded in 2006. The IPHC
took this action reluctantly, indicating that its preference would be
for domestic agencies to resolve allocation issues. The IPHC delayed
the effective date of the reduced bag limit to afford NMFS time to
resolve the issue under U.S. domestic law with regulations that would
achieve ``comparable reductions'' in halibut harvest by charter vessel
anglers in Area 2C.
In order to have an effective action in 2007, NMFS took action
under section 773c(a) and (b), independent of the Council process.
Rather than imposing a one halibut limit for certain portions of the
season, as proposed by the IPHC, NMFS employed other management
measures (daily bag limit of one halibut of any size and one halibut 32
inches or less) it determined would reduce sport fishing mortality of
halibut to a level comparable to the level that would have been
achieved by the proposed IPHC regulations. Note that this was not the
same as reducing the catch to the GHL, which would have required more
restrictive measures. Regulations implementing the above management
measures were published on June 4, 2007 (72 FR 30714).
During the first half of 2007, the Council also was considering
management alternatives for the charter vessel halibut fishery in Area
2C. Unlike the IPHC and NMFS actions, however, the Council's action was
designed specifically to maintain the charter vessel fishery to its
GHL.
Section 773c(c) of the Halibut Act provides that ``[t]he Regional
Fishery Management Council having authority for the geographical area
concerned [in this case the North Pacific Fishery Management Council]
may develop regulations governing the United States portion of
Convention waters, including limited access regulations, applicable to
nationals or vessels of the United States, or both, which are in
addition to, and not in conflict with regulations adopted
[[Page 78282]]
by the [International Pacific Halibut] Commission.''
The Council, through its authority under section 773c(c), developed
regulations in June 2007 to limit the harvest of charter vessel anglers
to the Area 2C GHL specified at 50 CFR 300.65(c). At that time, the
Area 2C GHL was at 1.432 Mlb (649.5 mt); however, the Council was
provided information that halibut biomass reductions might reduce the
Area 2C GHL in 2008. Given the information that the GHL might be
reduced, the Council proposed two options, one option if the Area 2C
GHL remained at 1.432 Mlb (649.5 mt), and one option if the Area 2C GHL
was reduced. NMFS published a proposed rule with those two options on
December 31, 2007.
At the time the Council took action in June 2007, it was aware that
charter anglers had exceeded the Area 2C GHL in 2004 (22 percent) and
2005 (36 percent), and preliminary estimates indicated that the 2006
Area 2C GHL also would be exceeded. Information provided to the Council
in October 2007 indicated that the 2006 Area 2C GHL was exceeded by
26.5 percent.
In January 2008, the IPHC established a constant exploitation yield
(CEY) that reduced the GHL to 0.931 Mlb (422.3 mt). This information
led NMFS to publish a final rule on May 28, 2008 (73 FR 30504), with
Option B, the option that was recommended by the Council and proposed
by NMFS if the GHL was reduced. The final rule implemented a one
halibut daily bag limit along with several other measures, including no
harvest of halibut by skippers and crew on a charter vessel and line
limits. Given the 2008 GHL, no other management measures analyzed by
the Council would have reduced the projected charter anglers overall
catch to the GHL.
As indicated earlier in this preamble, the May 28, 2008, final rule
was enjoined by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on
June 10, 2008. The full basis for the lawsuit (Van Valin, et al. v.
Gutierrez, Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-941) and the injunctive relief
provided by the U.S. District Court is a matter of public record and
will not be repeated here. However, one important aspect of the lawsuit
is clarified by this proposed rule.
In Van Valin, the Plaintiffs argued that NMFS did not have the
authority to impose certain management measures because it did not
follow a procedure as outlined in the preamble to the 2003 GHL rule.
According to the Plaintiffs, NMFS could not impose management measures
to manage the charter sector to the GHL until that GHL was exceeded.
This would be true even if previous GHLs had been exceeded, and the GHL
in place at the time of action was less than the previous exceeded GHLs
(as was the case in 2008). Although the result the Plaintiffs advocated
could be read into the rulemaking discussion found in the preamble to
the 2003 GHL rule, NMFS believes that such a result would be counter to
its responsibility to manage the halibut resource based on the best
present, as well as past, information. As such, NMFS specifically
repudiates that policy and proposes changes to the regulations to
clarify NMFS' authority to take actions that are necessary to carry out
the purposes and objectives of the Convention and the Halibut Act.
NMFS withdrew the May 28, 2008, rule on September 11, 2008 (73 FR
52795), to ensure that any confusion that may have occurred because of
the May 28, 2008, rule's perceived connection to the statements made in
the preamble to the 2003 GHL rule is eliminated and to establish a new
record and rationale for action under this proposed rule. An analysis
was prepared for this action that analyzes the necessity of taking this
action, the purposes of this action, and the alternatives evaluated to
achieve those purposes. NMFS considered this analysis, as well as the
Council's continued support for its June 2007 recommendation, as
evidenced by its actions and intent at its October 2008 meeting, the
impacts of potential future actions, such as the Catch Sharing Plan for
Areas 2C and 3A and moratorium on halibut charter businesses
recommended by the Council, and statements provided by staff of the
Commission concerning halibut stock management, in proposing this rule.
Executive Order 12962
This proposed action is consistent with E.O. 12962 which directs
Federal agencies to improve the quantity, function, sustainable
productivity, and distribution of aquatic resources for increased
recreational fishing opportunities (to the extent permitted by law and
where practicable.( This E.O. does not diminish NMFS( responsibility to
address allocation issues, nor does it require NMFS or the Council to
limit their ability to manage recreational fisheries. E.O. 12962
provides guidance to NMFS to improve the potential productivity of
aquatic resources for recreational fisheries. This proposed rule does
not diminish that productivity or countermand the intent of E.O. 12962.
This analysis did not reveal any Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with the proposed action.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 300
Fisheries, Fishing, Treaties.
Dated: December 16, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch III
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 300 as follows:
PART 300---INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 300, subpart E, continues
to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773-773k.
2. In Sec. 300.61, add definitions in alphabetical order for
``Area 3A'', ``Charter vessel angler'', ``Charter vessel fishing
trip'', ``Charter vessel guide'', ``Charter vessel operator'', ``Crew
member'', and ``Sport fishing guide services'', and revise the
definition for ``Guideline harvest level (GHL)'' to read as follows:
Sec. 300.61 Definitions.
* * * * *
Area 3A means all waters between Area 2C and a line extending from
the most northerly point on Cape Aklek (57[deg]41'15'' N. latitude,
155[deg]35'00'' W. longitude) to Cape Ikolik (57[deg]17'17'' N.
latitude, 154[deg]47'18'' W. longitude), then along the Kodiak Island
coastline to Cape Trinity (56[deg]44'50'' N. latitude, 154[deg]08'44''
W. longitude), then 140[deg] true.
* * * * *
Charter vessel angler, for purposes of Sec. 300.65(d), means a
person, paying or nonpaying, using the services of a charter vessel
guide.
Charter vessel fishing trip, for purposes of Sec. 300.65(d), means
the time period between the first deployment of fishing gear into the
water from a vessel after any charter vessel angler is onboard and the
offloading of one or more charter vessel anglers or any halibut from
that vessel.
Charter vessel guide, for purposes of Sec. 300.65(d), means a
person who is required to have an annual sport guide license issued by
the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, or a person who provides sport
fishing guide services.
Charter vessel operator, for purposes of Sec. 300.65(d), means the
person in control of the vessel during a charter vessel fishing trip.
* * * * *
[[Page 78283]]
Crew member, for purposes of Sec. 300.65(d), means an assistant,
deckhand, or similar person who works directly under the supervision of
and on the same vessel as a charter vessel guide.
* * * * *
Guideline harvest level (GHL) means the level of allowable halibut
harvest by the charter vessel fishery.
* * * * *
Sport fishing guide services, for purposes of Sec. 300.65(d),
means assistance, for compensation, to a person who is sport fishing,
to take or attempt to take fish by being onboard a vessel with such
person during any part of a charter vessel fishing trip. Sport fishing
guide services do not include services provided by a crew member.
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 300.65, revise paragraphs (c)(2) and (3) and paragraph
(d) to read as follows:
Sec. 300.65 Catch sharing plan and domestic management measures in
waters in and off Alaska.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) NMFS will publish a notice in the Federal Register on an annual
basis announcing the GHL based on the table in paragraph (c)(1) of this
section for Area 2C and Area 3A for that calendar year after the
Commission establishes the constant exploitation yield for that year.
(3) The announced GHLs for Area 2C and 3A are intended to be the
benchmarks for charter halibut harvest in those areas for the year in
which it is announced pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
NMFS may take action at any time to limit the charter halibut harvest
to as close to the GHL as practicable.
(d) Charter vessels in Area 2C and Area 3A--(1) General
requirements--(i) Logbook submission. Alaska Department of Fish and
Game Saltwater Sport Fishing Charter Trip Logbook data sheets must be
submitted to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Sport
Fish, 333 Raspberry Road, Anchorage, AK 99518-1599, and postmarked no
more than seven calendar days after the end of a charter vessel fishing
trip.
(ii) The charter vessel guide is responsible for complying with the
reporting requirements of this paragraph (d). The employer of the
charter vessel guide is responsible for ensuring that the charter
vessel guide complies with the reporting requirements of this paragraph
(d).
(2) Charter vessels in Area 2C--(i) Daily bag limit. The number of
halibut caught and retained by each charter vessel angler in Area 2C is
limited to no more than one halibut per calendar day.
(ii) Charter vessel guide and crew restriction. A charter vessel
guide, a charter vessel operator, and any crew member of a charter
vessel must not catch and retain halibut during a charter fishing trip.
(iii) Line limit. The number of lines used to fish for halibut
onboard a vessel must not exceed six or the number of charter vessel
anglers, whichever is less.
(iv) Recordkeeping and reporting requirements in Area 2C. Each
charter vessel angler and charter vessel guide onboard a vessel in Area
2C must comply with the following recordkeeping and reporting
requirements (see paragraphs (d)(2)(iv)(A) and (B) of this section):
(A) Charter vessel angler signature requirement. At the end of a
charter vessel fishing trip, each charter vessel angler who retains
halibut caught in Area 2C must acknowledge that his or her information
and the number of halibut retained (kept) are recorded correctly by
signing the back of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game Saltwater
Sport Fishing Charter Trip Logbook data sheet on the line number that
corresponds to the angler's information on the front of the logbook
data sheet.
(B) Charter vessel guide requirements. For each charter vessel
fishing trip in Area 2C, the charter vessel guide must record the
following information (see paragraphs (d)(2)(iv)(B)(1) through (8) of
this section) in the Alaska Department of Fish and Game Saltwater Sport
Fishing Charter Trip Logbook:
(1) Business owner license number. The sport fishing operator
business license number issued by the Alaska Department of Fish and
Game to the charter vessel guide or the charter vessel guide's
employer.
(2) Guide license number. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game
sport fishing guide license number held by charter vessel guide who
certified the logbook data sheet.
(3) Date. Month and day for each charter vessel fishing trip taken.
A separate logbook data sheet is required for each charter vessel
fishing trip if two or more trips were taken on the same day. A
separate logbook data sheet is required for each calendar day that
halibut are caught and retained during a multi-day trip.
(4) Regulatory area fished. Circle the regulatory area (Area 2C or
Area 3A) where halibut were caught and retained during each charter
vessel fishing trip. If halibut were caught and retained in Area 2C and
Area 3A during the same charter vessel fishing trip, then a separate
logbook data sheet must be used to record halibut caught and retained
for each regulatory area.
(5) Angler sport fishing license number and printed name. Before a
charter vessel fishing trip begins, record for each charter vessel
angler the Alaska Sport Fishing License number for the current year,
resident permanent license number, or disabled veteran license number,
and print the name of each paying and nonpaying charter vessel angler
onboard that will fish for halibut. Record the name of each angler not
required to have an Alaska Sport Fishing License or its equivalent.
(6) Number of halibut retained. For each charter vessel angler,
record the number of halibut caught and retained during the charter
vessel fishing trip.
(7) Signature. At the end of a charter vessel fishing trip,
acknowledge that the recorded information is correct by signing the
logbook data sheet.
(8) Angler signature. The charter vessel guide is responsible for
ensuring that charter vessel anglers comply with the signature
requirements at paragraph (d)(2)(iv)(A) of this section.
(3) Charter vessels in Area 3A. For each charter vessel fishing
trip in Area 3A, the charter vessel guide must record the regulatory
area (Area 2C or Area 3A) where halibut were caught and retained by
circling the appropriate area in the Alaska Department of Fish and Game
Saltwater Sport Fishing Charter Trip Logbook. If halibut were caught
and retained in Area 2C and Area 3A during the same charter vessel
fishing trip, then a separate logbook data sheet must be used to record
halibut caught and retained for each regulatory area.
* * * * *
4. In Sec. 300.66, revise paragraph (m) and add paragraphs (o),
(p), and (q) to read as follows:
Sec. 300.66 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(m) Exceed any of the harvest or gear limitations specified at
Sec. 300.65(d).
* * * * *
(o) Fail to comply with the requirements at Sec. 300.65(d).
(p) Fail to submit or submit inaccurate information on any report,
license, catch card, application or statement required under Sec.
300.65.
(q) Refuse to present valid identification, U.S. Coast Guard
operator's license, permit, license, or Alaska Department of Fish and
Game Saltwater Sport Fishing Charter Trip logbook upon the request of
an authorized officer.
[FR Doc. E8-30376 Filed 12-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S