Pears Grown in Oregon and Washington; Section 610 Review, 78149-78150 [E8-30310]
Download as PDF
78149
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 246
Monday, December 22, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 927
[Docket No. AMS–FV–08–0008, FV08–927–
610 Review]
Pears Grown in Oregon and
Washington; Section 610 Review
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Confirmation of regulations.
SUMMARY: This action summarizes the
results under the criteria contained in
section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), of an Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) review of Marketing
Order No. 927, regulating the handling
of pears grown in Oregon and
Washington. AMS has determined that
the marketing order should be
continued.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons may
obtain a copy of the review. Requests for
copies should be sent to the Docket
Clerk, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or
E-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov. A
copy of the review may also be obtained
via the Internet at: https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan M. Coleman or Gary D. Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1220 SW Third Avenue,
suite 385, Portland, Oregon 97204;
Telephone: (503) 326–2724; Fax: (503)
326–7440; or E-mail:
Sue.Coleman@usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Marketing
Order No. 927, as amended (7 CFR part
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:38 Dec 19, 2008
Jkt 217001
927), regulates the handling of pears
grown in Oregon and Washington State,
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’
The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The order establishes two
administrative committees, the Fresh
Pear Committee and the Processed Pear
Committee (Committees).
The Fresh Pear Committee (FPC) is
comprised of 13 members and 26 first
and second alternate members selected
by the Department of Agriculture
(USDA). Six of the members and their
respective alternates are growers of fresh
pears, six of the members and their
respective alternates are handlers, and
one member and the respective
alternates represent the public.
The Processed Pear Committee (PPC)
is comprised of 10 members and 20 first
and second alternate members selected
by the USDA. Three of the members and
their respective alternates are growers of
pears for processing, three of the
members and their respective alternates
are handlers, three of the members and
their respective alternates are
processors, and one member and the
respective alternates represent the
public.
For both Committees, members and
alternate members serve for two years
beginning on July 1 and ending on June
30. The terms are staggered so that half
of the members are selected annually.
Committee members may serve for a
maximum of three consecutive two-year
terms.
The Committees are responsible for
local administration of the order,
including recommending the
implementation of regulatory actions
and activities to USDA, collecting and
distributing industry statistics, and
ensuring compliance with the various
provisions of the order. The Committees
recommend amendments to the order
when needed to further industry
objectives. Activities of the Committees
are funded by assessments collected
from handlers. USDA must approve
recommendations by the Committees
before they can be implemented.
Currently, there are approximately
1,700 growers and 42 handlers of
Oregon-Washington pears in the
regulated production area. The majority
of these growers and handlers may be
classified as small entities. The
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
regulations implemented under the
order are applied uniformly to small
and large entities, and are designed to
benefit all industry entities regardless of
size, and do not have differential
impacts based on size.
AMS published in the Federal
Register on February 18, 1999 (64 FR
8014), a plan to review certain
regulations, including Marketing Order
No. 927, under criteria contained in
section 610 of the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601–
612). Updated plans were published in
the Federal Register on January 4, 2002
(67 FR 525), August 14, 2003 (68 FR
48574), and again on March 24, 2006 (71
FR 14827). Accordingly, AMS published
a notice of review and request for
written comments on the OregonWashington pear marketing order in the
March 18, 2008, issue of the Federal
Register (73 FR 14400). The deadline for
comments ended May 19, 2008. Three
comments were received on the
regulations.gov website in support of
the order and are discussed later in this
confirmation.
The review was undertaken to
determine whether the order should be
continued without being changed,
amended, or rescinded to minimize the
impacts on small entities. In conducting
this review, AMS considered the
following factors: (1) The continued
need for the order; (2) the nature of
complaints or comments received from
the public concerning the order; (3) the
complexity of the order; (4) the extent
to which the order overlaps, duplicates,
or conflicts with other Federal rules,
and, to the extent feasible, with State
and local governmental rules; and (5)
the length of time since the order has
been evaluated or the degree to which
technology, economic conditions, or
other factors have changed in the area
affected by the order.
The order authorizes grade, size,
quality, and container regulations for
fresh pears, excluding pears for
processing. Also authorized for fresh
pears are mandatory inspection
requirements. Only one minimum
quality handling regulation is currently
in effect, which covers fresh shipments
to North America for the Beurre
D’Anjou variety. This regulation has
helped ensure that only high quality
Beurre D’Anjou pears reach consumers,
contributing to increasing and
maintaining demand. The order also
authorizes production and post-harvest
E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM
22DER1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
78150
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 246 / Monday, December 22, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
research, marketing research, market
development, and promotion activities,
including paid advertising. The research
and promotion programs are all
currently active. Finally, the order
authorizes collection and dissemination
of information for the benefit of the
industry. Funds to administer the order
are obtained from assessments levied
against all product handled under the
order.
This order has a history of regulations
that includes minimum grade and size,
and mandatory inspection. Current
industry practices have moved beyond
the need for these regulations. However,
the order contains the authority for
these provisions should they ever be
necessary to enforce again.
Regarding complaints or comments
received from the public concerning the
order, AMS received three comments,
one from a pear handler, one from the
FPC, and one from the PPC. All
comments were supportive of the order
and addressed each of the five factors
under consideration by AMS. Marketing
order issues and programs are discussed
at public meetings, and all interested
persons are allowed to express their
views. All comments are considered in
the decision making process by the
Committees and AMS before any
program changes are implemented.
In considering the order’s complexity,
AMS has determined that the order is
not unduly complex.
During the review, the order was also
checked for duplication and overlap
with other regulations. AMS did not
identify any relevant Federal rules, or
State and local regulations that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the
order.
The order was established in August
1939 to regulate the winter pear
varieties. During the 69 years the order
has been in effect, AMS and the OregonWashington pear industry have
continuously monitored its operations.
Changes in regulations have been
implemented to reflect current industry
operating practices, and to solve
marketing problems as they occur. The
goal of periodic evaluations is to assure
that the order and the regulations
implemented under it fit the needs of
the industry and are consistent with the
Act.
The Committees meet once or twice a
year to discuss the order and the various
regulations issued thereunder, and to
determine if, or what, changes may be
necessary to reflect current industry
practices. As a result, regulatory
changes have been made numerous
times over the years to address industry
operation changes and to improve
program administration.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:38 Dec 19, 2008
Jkt 217001
In 1961, the order was redesignated
from 7 CFR 939 to 7 CFR 927. In 1986,
the title of the order was simplified, by
changing it from ‘‘Beurre D’Anjou,
Beurre Bosc, Winter Nelis, Doyenne du
Comice, Beurre Easter, and Beurre
Clairgeau Varieties of Pears Grown in
the States of Oregon, Washington, and
California’’ to ‘‘Winter Pears Grown in
Oregon, Washington, and California’’.
This action allowed more varieties to be
included under the order.
Additional order improvements have
included a redefinition of the
production area and a consolidation of
orders. In 1997, California growers and
handlers were removed from the order
and agreement at their request since the
harvesting and marketing seasons for
California pears are different than those
for pears grown in Oregon and
Washington. The most recent major
amendments occurred in 2005 to
consolidate the order with Marketing
Order No. 931, Fresh Bartlett Pears
Grown in Oregon and Washington. The
title changed again, becoming ‘‘Pears
Grown in Oregon and Washington.’’
Based on the potential benefits of the
order to growers, handlers, processors,
and consumers, AMS has determined
that the Oregon-Washington pear
marketing order should be continued.
The order was established to help the
industry work with USDA to solve
marketing problems. The collection,
compilation, and dissemination of
information has provided growers,
handlers, and processors with tools to
assist them in making production and
marketing decisions.
Numerous activities and projects
undertaken by the Committees have
allowed growers to earn higher revenues
and reduce the cost of production. The
minimum quality regulation of fresh
Beurre D’Anjou pear shipments has
benefited growers, handlers, and most
importantly, consumers. AMS will
continue to work with the OregonWashington pear industry in
maintaining an effective marketing
order program.
Dated: December 16, 2008.
James E. Link,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E8–30310 Filed 12–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 966
[Docket No. AMS–FV–08–0009; FV08–966–
610 Review]
Tomatoes Grown in Florida; Section
610 Review
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Confirmation of regulations.
SUMMARY: This action summarizes the
results under the criteria contained in
section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), of an Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) review of Marketing
Order No. 966, regulating the handling
of tomatoes grown in Florida (order).
AMS has determined that the order
should be continued.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons may
obtain a copy of the review. Requests for
copies should be sent to the Docket
Clerk, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or
E-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov. A
copy of the review may also be obtained
via the Internet at: https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William G. Pimental or Christian D.
Nissen, Southeast Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, Winter Haven, Florida
33884; Telephone: (863) 324–3375; Fax:
(863) 325–8793; or E-mail:
William.Pimental@usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@usda.gov.
Marketing
Order No. 966, as amended (7 CFR part
966), regulates the handling of tomatoes
grown in Florida, hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
The order establishes the Florida
Tomato Committee (Committee) as the
administrative body charged with
overseeing program operations. Staff is
hired to conduct the daily
administration of the program. The
Committee consists of 12 grower
members representing four districts.
Each member has an alternate. Members
and alternate members are elected
through nomination meetings held in
each district.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM
22DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 246 (Monday, December 22, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78149-78150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-30310]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 246 / Monday, December 22, 2008 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 78149]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 927
[Docket No. AMS-FV-08-0008, FV08-927-610 Review]
Pears Grown in Oregon and Washington; Section 610 Review
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Confirmation of regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action summarizes the results under the criteria
contained in section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), of an
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) review of Marketing Order No. 927,
regulating the handling of pears grown in Oregon and Washington. AMS
has determined that the marketing order should be continued.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons may obtain a copy of the review. Requests
for copies should be sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Fax:
(202) 720-8938; or E-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov. A copy of the
review may also be obtained via the Internet at: https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan M. Coleman or Gary D. Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220 SW Third Avenue,
suite 385, Portland, Oregon 97204; Telephone: (503) 326-2724; Fax:
(503) 326-7440; or E-mail: Sue.Coleman@usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Marketing Order No. 927, as amended (7 CFR
part 927), regulates the handling of pears grown in Oregon and
Washington State, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order
is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The order establishes two administrative committees, the Fresh Pear
Committee and the Processed Pear Committee (Committees).
The Fresh Pear Committee (FPC) is comprised of 13 members and 26
first and second alternate members selected by the Department of
Agriculture (USDA). Six of the members and their respective alternates
are growers of fresh pears, six of the members and their respective
alternates are handlers, and one member and the respective alternates
represent the public.
The Processed Pear Committee (PPC) is comprised of 10 members and
20 first and second alternate members selected by the USDA. Three of
the members and their respective alternates are growers of pears for
processing, three of the members and their respective alternates are
handlers, three of the members and their respective alternates are
processors, and one member and the respective alternates represent the
public.
For both Committees, members and alternate members serve for two
years beginning on July 1 and ending on June 30. The terms are
staggered so that half of the members are selected annually. Committee
members may serve for a maximum of three consecutive two-year terms.
The Committees are responsible for local administration of the
order, including recommending the implementation of regulatory actions
and activities to USDA, collecting and distributing industry
statistics, and ensuring compliance with the various provisions of the
order. The Committees recommend amendments to the order when needed to
further industry objectives. Activities of the Committees are funded by
assessments collected from handlers. USDA must approve recommendations
by the Committees before they can be implemented.
Currently, there are approximately 1,700 growers and 42 handlers of
Oregon-Washington pears in the regulated production area. The majority
of these growers and handlers may be classified as small entities. The
regulations implemented under the order are applied uniformly to small
and large entities, and are designed to benefit all industry entities
regardless of size, and do not have differential impacts based on size.
AMS published in the Federal Register on February 18, 1999 (64 FR
8014), a plan to review certain regulations, including Marketing Order
No. 927, under criteria contained in section 610 of the RFA (5 U.S.C.
601-612). Updated plans were published in the Federal Register on
January 4, 2002 (67 FR 525), August 14, 2003 (68 FR 48574), and again
on March 24, 2006 (71 FR 14827). Accordingly, AMS published a notice of
review and request for written comments on the Oregon-Washington pear
marketing order in the March 18, 2008, issue of the Federal Register
(73 FR 14400). The deadline for comments ended May 19, 2008. Three
comments were received on the regulations.gov website in support of the
order and are discussed later in this confirmation.
The review was undertaken to determine whether the order should be
continued without being changed, amended, or rescinded to minimize the
impacts on small entities. In conducting this review, AMS considered
the following factors: (1) The continued need for the order; (2) the
nature of complaints or comments received from the public concerning
the order; (3) the complexity of the order; (4) the extent to which the
order overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other Federal rules, and,
to the extent feasible, with State and local governmental rules; and
(5) the length of time since the order has been evaluated or the degree
to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed
in the area affected by the order.
The order authorizes grade, size, quality, and container
regulations for fresh pears, excluding pears for processing. Also
authorized for fresh pears are mandatory inspection requirements. Only
one minimum quality handling regulation is currently in effect, which
covers fresh shipments to North America for the Beurre D'Anjou variety.
This regulation has helped ensure that only high quality Beurre D'Anjou
pears reach consumers, contributing to increasing and maintaining
demand. The order also authorizes production and post-harvest
[[Page 78150]]
research, marketing research, market development, and promotion
activities, including paid advertising. The research and promotion
programs are all currently active. Finally, the order authorizes
collection and dissemination of information for the benefit of the
industry. Funds to administer the order are obtained from assessments
levied against all product handled under the order.
This order has a history of regulations that includes minimum grade
and size, and mandatory inspection. Current industry practices have
moved beyond the need for these regulations. However, the order
contains the authority for these provisions should they ever be
necessary to enforce again.
Regarding complaints or comments received from the public
concerning the order, AMS received three comments, one from a pear
handler, one from the FPC, and one from the PPC. All comments were
supportive of the order and addressed each of the five factors under
consideration by AMS. Marketing order issues and programs are discussed
at public meetings, and all interested persons are allowed to express
their views. All comments are considered in the decision making process
by the Committees and AMS before any program changes are implemented.
In considering the order's complexity, AMS has determined that the
order is not unduly complex.
During the review, the order was also checked for duplication and
overlap with other regulations. AMS did not identify any relevant
Federal rules, or State and local regulations that duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with the order.
The order was established in August 1939 to regulate the winter
pear varieties. During the 69 years the order has been in effect, AMS
and the Oregon-Washington pear industry have continuously monitored its
operations. Changes in regulations have been implemented to reflect
current industry operating practices, and to solve marketing problems
as they occur. The goal of periodic evaluations is to assure that the
order and the regulations implemented under it fit the needs of the
industry and are consistent with the Act.
The Committees meet once or twice a year to discuss the order and
the various regulations issued thereunder, and to determine if, or
what, changes may be necessary to reflect current industry practices.
As a result, regulatory changes have been made numerous times over the
years to address industry operation changes and to improve program
administration.
In 1961, the order was redesignated from 7 CFR 939 to 7 CFR 927. In
1986, the title of the order was simplified, by changing it from
``Beurre D'Anjou, Beurre Bosc, Winter Nelis, Doyenne du Comice, Beurre
Easter, and Beurre Clairgeau Varieties of Pears Grown in the States of
Oregon, Washington, and California'' to ``Winter Pears Grown in Oregon,
Washington, and California''. This action allowed more varieties to be
included under the order.
Additional order improvements have included a redefinition of the
production area and a consolidation of orders. In 1997, California
growers and handlers were removed from the order and agreement at their
request since the harvesting and marketing seasons for California pears
are different than those for pears grown in Oregon and Washington. The
most recent major amendments occurred in 2005 to consolidate the order
with Marketing Order No. 931, Fresh Bartlett Pears Grown in Oregon and
Washington. The title changed again, becoming ``Pears Grown in Oregon
and Washington.''
Based on the potential benefits of the order to growers, handlers,
processors, and consumers, AMS has determined that the Oregon-
Washington pear marketing order should be continued. The order was
established to help the industry work with USDA to solve marketing
problems. The collection, compilation, and dissemination of information
has provided growers, handlers, and processors with tools to assist
them in making production and marketing decisions.
Numerous activities and projects undertaken by the Committees have
allowed growers to earn higher revenues and reduce the cost of
production. The minimum quality regulation of fresh Beurre D'Anjou pear
shipments has benefited growers, handlers, and most importantly,
consumers. AMS will continue to work with the Oregon-Washington pear
industry in maintaining an effective marketing order program.
Dated: December 16, 2008.
James E. Link,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E8-30310 Filed 12-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P