Farallon National Wildlife Refuge, San Francisco County, CA, 78386-78387 [E8-30308]
Download as PDF
78386
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 246 / Monday, December 22, 2008 / Notices
We again invite comments concerning
this information collection on:
(1) Whether or not the collection of
information is necessary, including
whether or not the information will
have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. Before including your
address, phone number, e-mail address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment, including your personal
identifying information, may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask OMB in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that it will be done.
Dated: November 28, 2008
Hope Grey,
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
Fish and Wildlife Service.
FR Doc. E8–30432 Filed 12–19–08; 8:45 am
BILLING CODE 4310–55–S
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–R–2008–N0282; 81640–1265–
0000–S3]
Farallon National Wildlife Refuge, San
Francisco County, CA
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments: draft comprehensive
conservation plan and environmental
assessment.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce
that the Farallon National Wildlife
Refuge (Refuge) Draft Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental
Assessment (draft CCP/EA) is available
for review and comment. Also available
for review are the draft compatibility
determinations for research and
monitoring, media access, and
environmental education and
monitoring through a remote camera
system.
DATES: To ensure that we have adequate
time to evaluate and incorporate
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:07 Dec 19, 2008
Jkt 217001
suggestions and other input into the
planning process, we must receive
comments on or before February 20,
2009.
For information on
obtaining documents and submitting
comments, see ‘‘Public Review and
Comment’’ under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Winnie Chan, Refuge Planner, (510)
792–0222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, as amended
by the Improvement Act, requires us to
develop a CCP for each National
Wildlife Refuge. The purpose in
developing a CCP is to provide refuge
managers with a 15-year strategy for
achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and Service policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, the CCP identifies
wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities available to the public,
which can include opportunities for
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation
and photography, and environmental
education and interpretation.
Background
The Refuge is located off the coast of
San Francisco and is within San
Francisco County. The 211-acre Refuge
consists of four island groupings that
were first designated as a Refuge in 1909
‘‘as a preserve and breeding ground for
native birds’’ (Executive Order 1043,
Feb. 27, 1909). The Refuge supports the
largest seabird breeding colony in the
contiguous United States and provides
wintering and nesting habitat for
migratory seabirds and pinnipeds. In
1974, Congress enacted Pub. L. 93–550,
which designated all the islands except
for Southeast Island as the Farallon
Wilderness, totaling 141 acres.
Alternatives
The draft CCP/EA identifies and
evaluates four alternatives for managing
Farallon National Wildlife Refuge for
the next 15 years. Each alternative
describes a combination of wildlife,
habitat, and public use management
prescriptions designed to achieve
Refuge purposes. Of the alternatives
described below, we believe Alternative
C would best achieve the purposes of
the Refuge, and therefore we have
identified C as the Preferred Alternative.
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Alternative A, the no-action
alternative, assumes no change from
current management programs and is
considered the baseline with which to
compare other alternatives. Under this
alternative, the focus of the Refuge
would be to continue to protect and
maintain habitats for nesting seabirds
including restoration of native
vegetation. Wildlife research and
monitoring would continue. The Refuge
would remain closed to the public, with
the exception of requested media visits
that are closely supervised by Refuge
staff.
Alternative B calls for the
development of a vegetation
management and monitoring plan to
accelerate weed removal and restoration
of native vegetation. Non-native house
mice would be eradicated to reduce
predation of seabirds and a tiered
National Environmental Policy Act
planning document would be prepared
to evaluate the eradication methods and
protocols. Public involvement
opportunities for this tiered plan would
be provided. New research and
monitoring methods would be
implemented to improve wildlife
management. In addition, new or
expanded research studies will also be
implemented to study other wildlife on
the Refuge (e.g., arboreal salamanders,
hoary bats, and insects). Law
enforcement to reduce wildlife
disturbance would be increased through
coordination with other agencies and
outreach to boaters and pilots. The
Refuge would remain closed to public
access under this alternative, but
limited supervised access for media
personnel in order to further public
education and provide outreach
opportunities for the public would be
allowed. While land-based wildlife
observation would not be allowed,
Refuge staff will coordinate with charter
boat operators to enhance their wildlife
tours in waters surrounding the Refuge.
This alternative also includes outreach
and environmental education objectives,
including coordination with other
outreach organizations in the San
Francisco area, the development of
environmental education programs and
materials for outreach events, a remote
camera system, and expanding the
existing Farallon program in elementary
schools.
Alternative C, the preferred
alternative, would include the same
components as Alternative B. In
addition, a visitor service plan would be
developed to consider on-site visitor
opportunities such as tours and
volunteer activities. Additional areas on
Southeast Island would also be
considered for seasonal closure to
E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM
22DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 246 / Monday, December 22, 2008 / Notices
human access (for management
purposes) to provide additional nesting
habitat and reduce spread of non-native
vegetation.
Alternative D would include the same
components as Alternative B, but would
be more restrictive in terms of access.
Human access (for management
purposes) would be prohibited at North
Landing, portions of Lighthouse Hill,
and additional areas during the seabird
nesting season to reduce disturbance,
encourage expansion of nesting habitat,
and prevent the spread of invasive
plants. Wildlife monitoring would be
reduced as a result of the closures. The
Refuge would remain closed to public
access. This alternative would also
include use of a remote camera system
to provide remote monitoring and
wildlife observation opportunities.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Public Review and Comment
To obtain a copy of the draft CCP/EA,
write to Winnie Chan, Refuge Planner,
Farallon NWR CCP, San Francisco Bay
NWR Complex, 9500 Thornton Avenue,
Newark, CA 94560. You may view a
copy of the draft CCP/EA at this
address, or you may view it or
download it online at: https://
www.fws.gov/cno/refuges/farallon/.
Hard copies of the draft CCP/EA are
also available at the following locations:
• San Francisco Bay National
Wildlife Refuge Complex, 1 Marshlands
Road, Fremont, CA 94536.
• San Francisco Public Library,
Federal Documents, 100 Larkin Street,
San Francisco, CA 94102.
• CA/NV Refuge Planning Office,
2800 Cottage Way, W–1832,
Sacramento, CA 95825.
Address any comments on the draft
CCP/EA to: Winnie Chan, Refuge
Planner, Farallon NWR CCP, San
Francisco Bay NWR Complex, 9500
Thornton Avenue, Newark, CA 94560.
You may also e-mail comments to
sfbaynwrc@fws.gov or fax them to (510)
792–5828. If submitting by fax or e-mail,
please type ‘‘FNWR CCP’’ in the subject
line.
Public Comments
After the review and comment period
ends for this Draft CCP/EA, we will
analyze comments and address them in
our final CCP/EA. Before including your
address, phone number, e-mail address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:07 Dec 19, 2008
Jkt 217001
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Richard E. Sayers, Jr.,
Acting Regional Director, California and
Nevada Region, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. E8–30308 Filed 12–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[F–14866–A, F–14866–A2; AK–965–1410–
KC–P]
Alaska Native Claims Selection
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of decision approving
lands for conveyance.
SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR
2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that an
appealable decision approving lands for
conveyance pursuant to the Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act will be
issued to Sea Lion Corporation. The
lands are in the vicinity of Hooper Bay,
Alaska, and are located in:
Seward Meridian, Alaska
T. 21 N., R. 83 W.,
Sec. 3;
Secs. 6 to 10, inclusive;
Secs. 15 to 18, inclusive.
Containing approximately 4,775 acres.
T. 22 N., R. 83 W.,
Secs. 6 and 7;
Secs. 11 to 14, inclusive;
Secs. 23, 24, and 26;
Secs. 27 and 34.
Containing approximately 6,393 acres.
T. 21 N., R. 84 W.,
Secs. 1 to 5, inclusive;
Secs. 7 to 15, inclusive;
Sec. 24.
Containing approximately 7,960 acres.
T. 22 N., R. 84 W.,
Secs. 1 and 2;
Secs. 11 and 12;
Secs. 14, 18, 19, and 23;
Secs. 26 to 30, inclusive;
Secs. 32 to 36, inclusive.
Containing approximately 9,520 acres.
T. 20 N., R. 85 W.,
Secs. 5 to 9, inclusive;
Secs. 16 and 17;
Secs. 20 and 21.
Containing approximately 4,866 acres.
T. 21 N., R. 85 W.,
Sec. 1;
Secs. 8 to 12, inclusive;
Secs. 16 and 17;
Secs. 20 and 21;
Secs. 27, 28, and 29;
Secs. 33, 34, and 35.
Containing approximately 8,452 acres.
T. 22 N., R. 85 W.,
Secs. 11, 13, and 14;
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78387
Secs. 23 to 26, inclusive.
Containing approximately 3,732 acres.
T. 20 N., R. 86 W.,
Secs. 1, 2, and 12.
Containing approximately 1,699 acres.
T. 21 N., R. 86 W.,
Secs. 1, 2, and 3;
Secs. 7 to 12, inclusive;
Secs. 15 to 23, inclusive;
Secs. 26 to 35, inclusive.
Containing approximately 13,703 acres.
T. 18 N., R. 91 W.,
Secs. 13 to 16, inclusive;
Secs. 22 to 27, inclusive;
Secs. 34, 35, and 36.
Containing approximately 7,012 acres.
T. 15 N., R. 92 W.,
Secs. 4 to 7, inclusive.
Containing approximately 2,469 acres.
T. 16 N., R. 92 W.,
Secs. 3, 4, and 10;
Secs. 15, 21, 22, and 27;
Secs. 28 to 34, inclusive.
Containing approximately 4,185 acres.
T. 15 N., R. 93 W.,
Secs. 1 and 12.
Containing approximately 849 acres.
T. 16 N., R. 93 W.,
Sec. 36.
Containing approximately 52 acres.
Total aggregate of approximately 75,667
acres.
A portion of the subsurface estate in
these lands will be conveyed to Calista
Corporation when the surface estate is
conveyed to Sea Lion Corporation. The
remaining lands lie within Clarence
Rhode National Wildlife Range,
established January 20, 1969. The
subsurface estate in the refuge lands
will be reserved to the United States at
the time of conveyance. Notice of the
decision will also be published four
times in the Tundra Drums.
DATES: The time limits for filing an
appeal are:
1. Any party claiming a property
interest which is adversely affected by
the decision shall have until January 21,
2009 to file an appeal.
2. Parties receiving service of the
decision by certified mail shall have 30
days from the date of receipt to file an
appeal.
Parties who do not file an appeal in
accordance with the requirements of 43
CFR Part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed
to have waived their rights.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may
be obtained from: Bureau of Land
Management, Alaska State Office, 222
West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage,
Alaska 99513–7504.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Bureau of Land Management by phone
at 907–271–5960, or by e-mail at
ak.blm.conveyance@ak.blm.gov. Persons
who use a telecommunication device
E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM
22DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 246 (Monday, December 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78386-78387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-30308]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-R-2008-N0282; 81640-1265-0000-S3]
Farallon National Wildlife Refuge, San Francisco County, CA
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments: draft
comprehensive conservation plan and environmental assessment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce
that the Farallon National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge) Draft Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment (draft CCP/EA) is
available for review and comment. Also available for review are the
draft compatibility determinations for research and monitoring, media
access, and environmental education and monitoring through a remote
camera system.
DATES: To ensure that we have adequate time to evaluate and incorporate
suggestions and other input into the planning process, we must receive
comments on or before February 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: For information on obtaining documents and submitting
comments, see ``Public Review and Comment'' under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Winnie Chan, Refuge Planner, (510)
792-0222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as
amended by the Improvement Act, requires us to develop a CCP for each
National Wildlife Refuge. The purpose in developing a CCP is to provide
refuge managers with a 15-year strategy for achieving refuge purposes
and contributing toward the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge
System, consistent with sound principles of fish and wildlife
management, conservation, legal mandates, and Service policies. In
addition to outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife
and their habitats, the CCP identifies wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities available to the public, which can include opportunities
for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and
environmental education and interpretation.
Background
The Refuge is located off the coast of San Francisco and is within
San Francisco County. The 211-acre Refuge consists of four island
groupings that were first designated as a Refuge in 1909 ``as a
preserve and breeding ground for native birds'' (Executive Order 1043,
Feb. 27, 1909). The Refuge supports the largest seabird breeding colony
in the contiguous United States and provides wintering and nesting
habitat for migratory seabirds and pinnipeds. In 1974, Congress enacted
Pub. L. 93-550, which designated all the islands except for Southeast
Island as the Farallon Wilderness, totaling 141 acres.
Alternatives
The draft CCP/EA identifies and evaluates four alternatives for
managing Farallon National Wildlife Refuge for the next 15 years. Each
alternative describes a combination of wildlife, habitat, and public
use management prescriptions designed to achieve Refuge purposes. Of
the alternatives described below, we believe Alternative C would best
achieve the purposes of the Refuge, and therefore we have identified C
as the Preferred Alternative.
Alternative A, the no-action alternative, assumes no change from
current management programs and is considered the baseline with which
to compare other alternatives. Under this alternative, the focus of the
Refuge would be to continue to protect and maintain habitats for
nesting seabirds including restoration of native vegetation. Wildlife
research and monitoring would continue. The Refuge would remain closed
to the public, with the exception of requested media visits that are
closely supervised by Refuge staff.
Alternative B calls for the development of a vegetation management
and monitoring plan to accelerate weed removal and restoration of
native vegetation. Non-native house mice would be eradicated to reduce
predation of seabirds and a tiered National Environmental Policy Act
planning document would be prepared to evaluate the eradication methods
and protocols. Public involvement opportunities for this tiered plan
would be provided. New research and monitoring methods would be
implemented to improve wildlife management. In addition, new or
expanded research studies will also be implemented to study other
wildlife on the Refuge (e.g., arboreal salamanders, hoary bats, and
insects). Law enforcement to reduce wildlife disturbance would be
increased through coordination with other agencies and outreach to
boaters and pilots. The Refuge would remain closed to public access
under this alternative, but limited supervised access for media
personnel in order to further public education and provide outreach
opportunities for the public would be allowed. While land-based
wildlife observation would not be allowed, Refuge staff will coordinate
with charter boat operators to enhance their wildlife tours in waters
surrounding the Refuge. This alternative also includes outreach and
environmental education objectives, including coordination with other
outreach organizations in the San Francisco area, the development of
environmental education programs and materials for outreach events, a
remote camera system, and expanding the existing Farallon program in
elementary schools.
Alternative C, the preferred alternative, would include the same
components as Alternative B. In addition, a visitor service plan would
be developed to consider on-site visitor opportunities such as tours
and volunteer activities. Additional areas on Southeast Island would
also be considered for seasonal closure to
[[Page 78387]]
human access (for management purposes) to provide additional nesting
habitat and reduce spread of non-native vegetation.
Alternative D would include the same components as Alternative B,
but would be more restrictive in terms of access. Human access (for
management purposes) would be prohibited at North Landing, portions of
Lighthouse Hill, and additional areas during the seabird nesting season
to reduce disturbance, encourage expansion of nesting habitat, and
prevent the spread of invasive plants. Wildlife monitoring would be
reduced as a result of the closures. The Refuge would remain closed to
public access. This alternative would also include use of a remote
camera system to provide remote monitoring and wildlife observation
opportunities.
Public Review and Comment
To obtain a copy of the draft CCP/EA, write to Winnie Chan, Refuge
Planner, Farallon NWR CCP, San Francisco Bay NWR Complex, 9500 Thornton
Avenue, Newark, CA 94560. You may view a copy of the draft CCP/EA at
this address, or you may view it or download it online at: https://
www.fws.gov/cno/refuges/farallon/.
Hard copies of the draft CCP/EA are also available at the following
locations:
San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 1
Marshlands Road, Fremont, CA 94536.
San Francisco Public Library, Federal Documents, 100
Larkin Street, San Francisco, CA 94102.
CA/NV Refuge Planning Office, 2800 Cottage Way, W-1832,
Sacramento, CA 95825.
Address any comments on the draft CCP/EA to: Winnie Chan, Refuge
Planner, Farallon NWR CCP, San Francisco Bay NWR Complex, 9500 Thornton
Avenue, Newark, CA 94560. You may also e-mail comments to
sfbaynwrc@fws.gov or fax them to (510) 792-5828. If submitting by fax
or e-mail, please type ``FNWR CCP'' in the subject line.
Public Comments
After the review and comment period ends for this Draft CCP/EA, we
will analyze comments and address them in our final CCP/EA. Before
including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal
identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your
entire comment--including your personal identifying information--may be
made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your
comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Richard E. Sayers, Jr.,
Acting Regional Director, California and Nevada Region, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. E8-30308 Filed 12-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P