Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-90-30 Airplanes, 77555-77557 [E8-30258]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
https://www.federalreserve.gov/
generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail:
regs.comments@federalreserve.gov.
Include the docket number in the
subject line of the message.
• Fax: (202) 452–3819 or (202) 452–
3102.
• Mail: Address to Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary, Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20551.
All public comments will be made
available on the Board’s Web site at
https://www.federalreserve.gov/
generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm as
submitted, unless modified for technical
reasons. Accordingly, comments will
not be edited to remove any identifying
or contact information. Public
comments may also be viewed
electronically or in paper in Room MP–
500 of the Board’s Martin Building (20th
and C Streets, NW.) between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m. on weekdays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jamie Z. Goodson or Nikita M. Pastor,
Attorneys; Division of Consumer and
Community Affairs, Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System,
Washington, DC 20551, at (202) 452–
2412 or (202) 452–3667. For users of
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf
(TDD) only, contact (202) 263–4869.
On
December 10, 2008, the Board published
a proposal to amend Regulation Z to
implement the provisions of the
Mortgage Disclosure Improvement Act
of 2008 (the MDIA), which amends the
Truth in Lending Act. The Board’s
proposed rule would revise Regulation
Z’s requirements for the timing and
content of disclosures for closed-end
mortgage transactions secured by a
consumer’s dwelling. The notice of
proposed rulemaking stated that the
public comment period would close on
January 23, 2009. The Board is now
extending the public comment period
until February 9, 2009, consistent with
the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, which requires a 60-day
comment period.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8–30084 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–0074; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–151–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell
Douglas Model MD–90–30 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM);
reopening of comment period.
SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier
proposed airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain McDonnell Douglas Model
MD–90–30 airplanes. The original
NPRM would have required
replacement of the wire harness of the
auxiliary hydraulic pump with a new
wire harness, and routing the new wire
harness outside of the tire burst area.
The original NPRM resulted from fuel
system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer, as well as reports of
shorted wires in the right wheel well
and evidence of arcing on the power
cables of the auxiliary hydraulic pump.
This action revises the original NPRM
by proposing to require modifying the
auxiliary hydraulic power system
(including doing all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions). We
are proposing this supplemental NPRM
to prevent shorted wires or electrical
arcing at the auxiliary hydraulic pump,
which could result in a fire in the wheel
well. We are also proposing this
supplemental NPRM to reduce the
potential of an ignition source adjacent
to the fuel tanks, which, in combination
with flammable fuel vapors, could result
in a fuel tank explosion and consequent
loss of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this supplemental NPRM by January 13,
2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77555
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855
Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach,
California 90846, Attention: Data and
Service Management, Dept. C1–L5A
(D800–0024); telephone 206–544–9990;
fax 206–766–5682; e-mail
DDCS@boeing.com; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221
or 425–227–1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken
Sujishi, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin
Safety/Mechanical and Environmental
Systems Branch, ANM–150L, FAA, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
California 90712–4137; telephone (562)
627–5353; fax (562) 627–5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2007–0074; Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–151–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
77556
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) (the ‘‘original
NPRM’’) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to
include an airworthiness directive (AD)
that would apply to certain McDonnell
Douglas Model MD–90–30 airplanes.
That original NPRM was published in
the Federal Register on October 23,
2007 (72 FR 59969). That original NPRM
proposed to require replacement of the
wire harness of the auxiliary hydraulic
pump with a new wire harness, and
routing the new wire harness outside of
the tire burst area.
Actions Since Original NPRM Was
Issued
Since we issued the original NPRM,
we have reviewed Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin MD90–29A021, Revision 1,
dated August 29, 2008. We referred to
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD90–
29A021, dated May 15, 2007, as the
appropriate source of service
information for doing the replacement
and routing of auxiliary hydraulic pump
wire harnesses specified in the original
NPRM. Revision 1 of the alert service
bulletin describes different procedures
for modifying the auxiliary hydraulic
power system (including doing all
applicable related investigative and
corrective actions). Revision 1 of the
alert service bulletin describes
procedures for doing the following
actions, depending on the group and
configuration identified in the alert
service bulletin:
• Installing auxiliary hydraulic pump
wire harness support brackets.
• Replacing and routing auxiliary
hydraulic pump wire harnesses.
• Installing clamps.
• Installing a wire harness assembly
support bracket in the right wheel well
if necessary.
• Doing related investigative and
corrective actions. Related investigative
and corrective actions include doing a
general visual inspection of the wire
harness protective sleeving dimensions,
and changing wire harness sleeving if
necessary.
We have revised paragraphs (c) and (f)
of this supplemental NPRM to refer to
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD90–
29A021, Revision 1, dated August 29,
2008.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comment received.
Request To Revise Compliance Time
Japan Airlines requests that we revise
the compliance time specified in the
original NPRM of ‘‘within 18 months’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
to a compliance time that is ‘‘18 months
or more.’’ Japan Airlines states that parts
would not be available until June 8,
2008, and that a longer compliance
would support its maintenance
schedule.
We do not agree to revise the
compliance time. Boeing confirmed that
necessary parts will be available within
the proposed compliance time. In
developing an appropriate compliance
time for this action, we considered the
urgency associated with the subject
unsafe condition, the availability of
required parts, and the practical aspect
of accomplishing the required actions
within a period of time that corresponds
to the normal scheduled maintenance
for most affected operators. Operators
may request an alternative method of
compliance in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (g) of
the supplemental NPRM. We have not
changed the supplemental NPRM in this
regard.
Revision to Costs of Compliance
We have revised the ‘‘Costs of
Compliance’’ paragraph of this
supplemental NPRM to reflect the
revised work hours and parts cost
specified in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin MD90–29A021, Revision 1,
dated August 29, 2008.
FAA’s Determination and Proposed
Requirements of the Supplemental
NPRM
We are proposing this supplemental
NPRM because we evaluated all
pertinent information and determined
an unsafe condition exists and is likely
to exist or develop on other products of
the same type design. Certain changes
described above expand the scope of the
original NPRM. As a result, we have
determined that it is necessary to reopen
the comment period to provide
additional opportunity for the public to
comment on this supplemental NPRM.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 110 airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet.
This proposed AD would affect about 16
airplanes of U.S. registry. The proposed
actions would take between 3 and 7
work hours per airplane, depending on
the configuration, at an average labor
rate of $80 per work hour. Required
parts would cost up to $5,343 per
airplane. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the proposed AD for
U.S. operators is up to $94,448, or
$5,903 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory
evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
McDonnell Douglas: Docket No. FAA–2007–
0074; Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–
151–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by January
13, 2009.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
December 12, 2008.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–30258 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
(c) This AD applies to McDonnell Douglas
Model MD–90–30 airplanes, certificated in
any category; as identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD90–29A021, Revision 1,
dated August 29, 2008.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Unsafe Condition
[Docket No. 0810241396–81397–01]
(d) This AD results from fuel system
reviews conducted by the manufacturer, as
well as reports of shorted wires in the right
wheel well and evidence of arcing on the
power cables of the auxiliary hydraulic
pump. We are issuing this AD to prevent
shorted wires or electrical arcing at the
auxiliary hydraulic pump, which could
result in a fire in the wheel well. We are also
issuing this AD to reduce the potential of an
ignition source adjacent to the fuel tanks,
which, in combination with flammable fuel
vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion
and consequent loss of the airplane.
RIN 0648–AX34
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Modification
(f) Within 18 months after the effective
date of this AD, modify the auxiliary
hydraulic power system and do all applicable
related investigative and corrective actions
by accomplishing all applicable actions
specified in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
MD90–29A021, Revision 1, dated August 29,
2008. Do all applicable related investigative
and corrective actions before further flight.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(g)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, ATTN: Ken
Sujishi, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety/
Mechanical and Environmental Systems
Branch, ANM–150L, FAA, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712–
4137; telephone (562) 627–5353; fax (562)
627–5210; has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
15 CFR Part 922
Changes to the Florida Keys National
Marine Sanctuary Regulations;
Technical Corrections and Minor
Substantive Changes
Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA), Department of Commerce
(DOC).
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
public comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NOAA proposes to amend the
regulations implementing the Florida
Keys National Marine Sanctuary to
make technical corrections and
modifications to clarify intent to several
areas in the regulations. As part of these
modifications, NOAA proposes to
amend the definition of coral to
specifically include the common sea
fan, Gorgonia ventalina and Venus sea
fan, Gorgonia flabellum, which are both
important sanctuary resources and are
currently managed under the category
‘‘live rock;’’ specify that ‘‘touching’’
coral is an injury and therefore, a
prohibited activity in the FKNMS;
amend the safe distance between vessels
and ‘‘divers down’’ flags to be 100 yards
instead of 100 feet; clarify that the
prohibitions listed for Sanctuary
Preservation Areas and Ecological
Reserves also apply in Research-only
Areas; and Correct several citations that
are currently out of date.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule
may be made until January 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit electronic
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking
Portal.
• Mail: David A. Score,
Superintendent, Florida Keys National
Marine Sanctuary, 33 East Quay Road,
Key West, FL 33040.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77557
• Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
be generally posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit confidential business
information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information. NOAA will
accept anonymous comments (enter N/
A in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, Wordperfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Score, Superintendent, Florida
Keys National Marine Sanctuary, 33
East Quay Road, Key West, FL 33040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
This Federal Register document is
also accessible via the Internet at
https://www.access.gpo.gov/su-docs/
aces/aces_1_40.html.
I. Background
In recognition of its important
ecological role as a rich and unique
marine environment with seagrass
meadows, mangrove islands, and
extensive living coral reefs, Congress
designated the Florida Keys National
Marine Sanctuary (FKINMS or
Sanctuary) in 1990 (Pub. L. 101–605).
Through this designation, Congress
directed NOAA and the State of Florida
to jointly develop a comprehensive
program to reduce the risk of damage to
these living marine resources, reduce
the pollution in the waters of the
Florida Keys, and to protect and restore
the water quality, coral reefs, and other
living marine resources of the Florida
Keys. As such, NOAA and the State of
Florida worked together to create the
management plan for the FKNMS. The
FKNMS regulations implementing the
designation were published on June 12,
1997 (62 FR 32154) and became
effective on July 1, 1997.
In the 18 years since designation,
several regulatory issues have arisen
that were not clearly addressed when
the FKNMS regulations were adopted.
In addition, there have been several
changes to the Florida state laws during
the same period and several technical
errors identified in the current FKNMS
regulations. NOAA is thus proposing to
update the FKNMS regulations to make
technical corrections, minor substantive
clarifications, and codification of
existing regulatory interpretation to
address these issues and provide
consistency with state law.
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 245 (Friday, December 19, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77555-77557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-30258]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-0074; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-151-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model MD-90-30
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); reopening of
comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier proposed airworthiness directive
(AD) for certain McDonnell Douglas Model MD-90-30 airplanes. The
original NPRM would have required replacement of the wire harness of
the auxiliary hydraulic pump with a new wire harness, and routing the
new wire harness outside of the tire burst area. The original NPRM
resulted from fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer, as
well as reports of shorted wires in the right wheel well and evidence
of arcing on the power cables of the auxiliary hydraulic pump. This
action revises the original NPRM by proposing to require modifying the
auxiliary hydraulic power system (including doing all applicable
related investigative and corrective actions). We are proposing this
supplemental NPRM to prevent shorted wires or electrical arcing at the
auxiliary hydraulic pump, which could result in a fire in the wheel
well. We are also proposing this supplemental NPRM to reduce the
potential of an ignition source adjacent to the fuel tanks, which, in
combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank
explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this supplemental NPRM by January
13, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard,
Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service Management,
Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024); telephone 206-544-9990; fax 206-766-5682; e-
mail DDCS@boeing.com; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken Sujishi, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin
Safety/Mechanical and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150L, FAA, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, California 90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5353; fax (562)
627-5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2007-0074;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-151-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
[[Page 77556]]
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) (the ``original
NPRM'') to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an airworthiness directive
(AD) that would apply to certain McDonnell Douglas Model MD-90-30
airplanes. That original NPRM was published in the Federal Register on
October 23, 2007 (72 FR 59969). That original NPRM proposed to require
replacement of the wire harness of the auxiliary hydraulic pump with a
new wire harness, and routing the new wire harness outside of the tire
burst area.
Actions Since Original NPRM Was Issued
Since we issued the original NPRM, we have reviewed Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD90-29A021, Revision 1, dated August 29, 2008. We
referred to Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD90-29A021, dated May 15,
2007, as the appropriate source of service information for doing the
replacement and routing of auxiliary hydraulic pump wire harnesses
specified in the original NPRM. Revision 1 of the alert service
bulletin describes different procedures for modifying the auxiliary
hydraulic power system (including doing all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions). Revision 1 of the alert service
bulletin describes procedures for doing the following actions,
depending on the group and configuration identified in the alert
service bulletin:
Installing auxiliary hydraulic pump wire harness support
brackets.
Replacing and routing auxiliary hydraulic pump wire
harnesses.
Installing clamps.
Installing a wire harness assembly support bracket in the
right wheel well if necessary.
Doing related investigative and corrective actions.
Related investigative and corrective actions include doing a general
visual inspection of the wire harness protective sleeving dimensions,
and changing wire harness sleeving if necessary.
We have revised paragraphs (c) and (f) of this supplemental NPRM to
refer to Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD90-29A021, Revision 1, dated
August 29, 2008.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comment received.
Request To Revise Compliance Time
Japan Airlines requests that we revise the compliance time
specified in the original NPRM of ``within 18 months'' to a compliance
time that is ``18 months or more.'' Japan Airlines states that parts
would not be available until June 8, 2008, and that a longer compliance
would support its maintenance schedule.
We do not agree to revise the compliance time. Boeing confirmed
that necessary parts will be available within the proposed compliance
time. In developing an appropriate compliance time for this action, we
considered the urgency associated with the subject unsafe condition,
the availability of required parts, and the practical aspect of
accomplishing the required actions within a period of time that
corresponds to the normal scheduled maintenance for most affected
operators. Operators may request an alternative method of compliance in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (g) of the
supplemental NPRM. We have not changed the supplemental NPRM in this
regard.
Revision to Costs of Compliance
We have revised the ``Costs of Compliance'' paragraph of this
supplemental NPRM to reflect the revised work hours and parts cost
specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD90-29A021, Revision 1,
dated August 29, 2008.
FAA's Determination and Proposed Requirements of the Supplemental NPRM
We are proposing this supplemental NPRM because we evaluated all
pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition exists and is
likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.
Certain changes described above expand the scope of the original NPRM.
As a result, we have determined that it is necessary to reopen the
comment period to provide additional opportunity for the public to
comment on this supplemental NPRM.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 110 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This proposed AD would affect about 16 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The proposed actions would take between 3 and 7 work
hours per airplane, depending on the configuration, at an average labor
rate of $80 per work hour. Required parts would cost up to $5,343 per
airplane. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the proposed AD
for U.S. operators is up to $94,448, or $5,903 per airplane.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866,
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
[[Page 77557]]
McDonnell Douglas: Docket No. FAA-2007-0074; Directorate Identifier
2007-NM-151-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by January 13, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to McDonnell Douglas Model MD-90-30
airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin MD90-29A021, Revision 1, dated August 29,
2008.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from fuel system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer, as well as reports of shorted wires in the right wheel
well and evidence of arcing on the power cables of the auxiliary
hydraulic pump. We are issuing this AD to prevent shorted wires or
electrical arcing at the auxiliary hydraulic pump, which could
result in a fire in the wheel well. We are also issuing this AD to
reduce the potential of an ignition source adjacent to the fuel
tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could
result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Modification
(f) Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD, modify
the auxiliary hydraulic power system and do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions by accomplishing all applicable
actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD90-29A021, Revision 1, dated August 29, 2008. Do
all applicable related investigative and corrective actions before
further flight.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(g)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
FAA, ATTN: Ken Sujishi, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety/Mechanical
and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150L, FAA, Los Angeles
Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
California 90712-4137; telephone (562) 627-5353; fax (562) 627-5210;
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 12, 2008.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-30258 Filed 12-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P