Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Space Vehicle and Test Flight Activities from Vandenberg Air Force Base (VAFB), California, 77577-77589 [E8-30237]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: December 8, 2008.
Lyle Laverty,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and
Parks.
[FR Doc. E8–29671 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–C
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 216
[Docket No. 0808041027–81574–01]
RIN 0648–AX08
Taking and Importing Marine
Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to Space Vehicle and Test
Flight Activities from Vandenberg Air
Force Base (VAFB), California
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: NMFS has received a request
from the U.S. Air Force (USAF) for
authorization for the take of marine
mammals, by harassment, incidental to
launching space launch vehicles,
intercontinental ballistic and small
missiles, and aircraft and helicopter
operations at VAFB. By this document,
NMFS is proposing regulations to
govern that take. In order to issue a
Letter of Authorization (LOA) and issue
final regulations governing the take,
NMFS must determine that the taking
will have a negligible impact on the
species or stocks and will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of such species or stock for
taking for subsistence uses. NMFS must
also prescribe the means of effecting the
least practicable adverse impact on such
species or stock and their habitats.
DATES: Comments and information must
be received no later than January 5,
2009.
You may submit comments,
identified by 0648–AX08, by any one of
the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Hand delivery or mailing of paper,
disk, or CD-ROM comments should be
addressed to P. Michael Payne, Chief,
Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3225.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter N/A in the required
fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF file formats only.
A copy of the application containing
a list of references used in this
document and the Draft Environmental
Assessment (EA) may be obtained by
writing to the above address, by
telephoning the contact listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, or on the
Internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/permits/incidental.htm#applications.
Documents cited in this proposed rule
may also be viewed, by appointment,
during regular business hours at the
above address. To help NMFS process
and review comments more efficiently,
please use only one method to submit
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Candace Nachman, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 713–2289, ext.
156.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA;
16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct the
Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) to
allow, upon request, the incidental, but
not intentional taking of small numbers
of marine mammals by U.S. citizens
who engage in a specified activity (other
than commercial fishing) within a
specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations
are issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
Authorization for incidental takings
may be granted if NMFS finds that the
taking will have a negligible impact on
the species or stock(s), will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
certain subsistence uses, and that the
permissible methods of taking and
requirements pertaining to the
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77577
mitigation, monitoring and reporting of
such taking are set forth.
NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as:
an impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably expected
to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.
The National Defense Authorization
Act of 2004 (NDAA) (Public Law 108–
136) removed the ‘‘small numbers’’ and
‘‘specified geographical region’’
limitations and amended the definition
of ‘‘harassment’’ as it applies to a
‘‘military readiness activity’’ to read as
follows (Section 3(18)(B) of the MMPA):
(i) any act that injures or has the significant
potential to injure a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild [Level A
Harassment]; or (ii) any act that disturbs or
is likely to disturb a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of natural behavioral patterns,
including, but not limited to, migration,
surfacing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering, to a point where such behavioral
patterns are abandoned or significantly
altered [Level B Harassment].
Summary of Request
On March 21, 2008, NMFS received
an application from the USAF
requesting authorization for the take of
four species of marine mammals
incidental to space vehicle and test
flight activities from VAFB, which
would impact pinnipeds on VAFB and
the Northern Channel Islands (NCI).
NMFS proposes regulations to govern
these activities, to be effective from
February 7, 2009, through February 6,
2014. These regulations, if
implemented, would allow NMFS to
issue annual LOAs to the USAF. The
current regulations and LOA expire on
February 6, 2009. These training
activities are classified as military
readiness activities. Marine mammals
may be exposed to continuous noise due
mostly to combustion effects of aircraft
and launch vehicles and impulsive
noise due to sonic boom effects. The
USAF requests authorization to take
four pinniped species by Level B
Harassment.
Description of the Specified Activity
VAFB (see Figure 1 in the USAF
application) is headquarters to the 30th
Space Wing (SW), the Air Force Space
Command unit that operates VAFB and
the Western Range. VAFB operates as a
missile test base and aerospace center,
supporting west coast space launch
activities for the USAF, Department of
Defense, National Aeronautics and
Space Administration, and commercial
contractors. VAFB is the main west
coast launch facility for placing
commercial, government, and military
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
77578
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
satellites into polar orbit on expendable
(unmanned) launch vehicles, and for
testing and evaluation of
intercontinental ballistic missiles
(ICBM) and sub-orbital target and
interceptor missiles. In addition to
space vehicle and missile launch
activities at VAFB, there are helicopter
and aircraft operations for purposes
such as search-and-rescue, delivery of
space vehicle components, launch
mission support, and security
reconnaissance. The USAF expects to
launch a maximum of 30 rockets and
missiles per year from VAFB.
There are currently six active space
launch vehicle (SLV) facilities at VAFB
(VAFB, 2007), used to launch satellites
into polar orbit. These facilities support
the launch programs for space vehicles
including the Atlas V, Delta II, Delta IV,
Falcon, Minotaur, and Taurus. The
Falcon has yet to launch from VAFB
and is scheduled for its first launch in
August, 2009 (30 SW, 2008a). Details on
the vehicle types and the sound
exposure levels (SELs) produced by
each missile or rocket are described in
the following sections.
Atlas V
The Atlas V vehicle is launched from
Space Launch Complex (SLC)-3E on
south VAFB, the site of the previous
Atlas IIAS program. This SLC is
approximately 9.9 km (6.2 mi) from the
main haul-out area on VAFB, known as
Rocky Point (see Figure 2 in the USAF
application), which encompasses
several smaller haul-outs. SLC–3E is
approximately 11.1 km (6.9 mi) from the
closest north VAFB haul-out, known as
the Spur Road haul-out site (Figure 3 in
the application) and 13.5 km (8.4 mi)
from the next closest haul-out, the
nearby Purisima Point haul-out site
(Figure 3 in the application).
The Atlas V is a medium lift vehicle
that can be flown in two series of
configurations - the Atlas V400 series
and the Atlas V500 series. Both series
use the Standard Booster as the single
body booster. The V400 series
accommodates a 4.2 m (13.8 ft) payload
fairing and as many as three solid rocket
boosters. The V500 series
accommodates a 5.4 m (17.7 ft) fairing
and as many as five solid rocket
boosters. The Atlas V400 series will lift
as much as 7,800 kg (17,196 lbs) into
geosynchronous transfer orbit or as
much as 13,620 kg (30,027 lbs) into low
earth orbit. The Atlas V500 series will
lift as much as 8,700 kg (19,180 lbs) into
geosynchronous transfer orbit or as
much as 21,050 kg (46,407 lbs) into low
earth orbit. The Atlas V consists of a
common booster core (CBC; 3.8 m (12.5
ft) in diameter and 32.5 m (106.6 ft)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
high) powered by an RD180 engine that
burns a liquid propellant fuel consisting
of liquid oxygen and RP1 fuel
(kerosene). The RD180 engine provides
840,000 lbs of thrust on liftoff. There is
a Centaur upper stage (3.1 m (10.2 ft) in
diameter and 12.7 m (41.7 ft) high)
powered by a liquid oxygen and liquid
hydrogen fuel.
The first Atlas V launch occurred on
March 13, 2008. Acoustic monitoring
was conducted for this launch at VAFB.
However, an equipment malfunction
during the launch prevented the proper
functioning of the digital audio tape
(DAT) recorder during the launch. Since
acoustic data was only gathered with
the sound level meter (SLM), not all
metrics were obtained for that launch.
The Atlas V launch had an A-weighted
SEL (ASEL) of 96.5 dB (MSRS, 2008c).
The Atlas V was predicted to create a
sonic boom of as much as 7.2 pounds
per square foot (psf), impacting the NCI
including San Miguel Island (SMI; see
Figure 4 in the USAF application). The
size of the actual sonic boom would
depend on meteorological conditions,
which can vary by day and season and
with the trajectory of the vehicle. A
sonic boom greater than 1 psf was
predicted for the initial Atlas V launch,
thus acoustic monitoring was performed
on SMI. Measurements conducted at
Cardwell Point indicated a sonic boom
of 1.24 psf with a rise time of 2.4
milliseconds (ms).
Delta II
The Delta II is launched from SLC–2
on north VAFB (see Figure 3 in the
USAF application) approximately 2 km
(1.2 mi) from the Spur Road harbor seal
haul-out site and 2.3 km (1.4 mi) from
the Purisima Point haul-out site. The
Delta II is a medium-sized launch
vehicle approximately 38 m (124.7 ft)
tall. The Delta II uses a Rocketdyne RS–
27A main liquid propellant engine and
additional solid rocket strap-on graphite
epoxy motors (GEMs) during liftoff. A
total of three, four, or nine GEMs can be
attached for added boost during liftoff.
When nine GEMs are used, six are
ignited at liftoff and three are lit once
the rocket is airborne. When three or
four GEMs are used they are all ignited
at liftoff. The number of GEMs attached
to each vehicle will determine the
amount of sound power produced by
the vehicle.
Eight Delta II launches have been
acoustically quantified near the Spur
Road harbor seal haul-out site. The
Delta II is the second loudest of the
SLVs at the Spur Road haul-out site, the
Taurus vehicle being the loudest (see
Table 2 in the application). The Delta II
has an unweighted SEL measurements
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(based on the six initial acousticallymeasured launches) ranging from 126.5
to 128.8 dB and averaging 127.4 dB, as
measured by the DAT recorder. The Cweighted SEL (CSEL) ranged from 124.3
to 126.7 dB with an average of 125.4 dB
(DAT). The ASEL measurements from
both a SLM and the DAT were similar
and ranged from 111.8 to 118.2 dB and
had an average of 114.5 dB (DAT). The
maximum fast A-weighted sound level
(Lmax) values ranged from 104.2 to
112.5 dB and averaged 109.5 dB.
Sonic booms have been measured on
SMI from three Delta II launches: the
EO–1, Iridium MS–12, and AURA
(November 2000, February 2002, and
July 2004, respectively). Both the
Iridium MS–12 and AURA had two
small sonic booms impact the Point
Bennett area of SMI. Iridium MS–12 had
peak overpressures of 0.47 and 0.64 psf
and rise times of 18 and 91 ms, while
AURA had peak overpressures of 0.79
and 1.34 psf and rise times of 9.5 and
10.5 ms. The Delta II EO 1 had a single
sonic boom with a peak overpressure of
0.4 psf and rise time of .041 ms.
Delta IV
The Delta IV is launched from SLC–
6, which is 2.8 km (1.7 mi) north of the
main harbor seal haul-out site at South
Rocky Point (see Figure 2 in the USAF
application). The Delta IV family of
launch vehicles consists of five launch
vehicle configurations utilizing a CBC
first stage (liquid fueled) and zero, two,
or four strap on solid rocket GEMs. The
Delta IV comes in four medium lift
configurations and one heavy lift
configuration consisting of multiple
CBCs (Table 4 in the application). The
Delta IV can carry payloads from 4,210
to 13,130 kg (9,281 to 28,947 lbs) into
geosynchronous transfer orbit.
Previously the Athena launch vehicle
was launched from SLC–6. The Athena
was a much smaller vehicle than the
Delta IV but was one of the top three
loudest vehicles (Table 1 in the
application) at the haul-out, given its
close proximity. Because the Delta IV
was predicted to be the loudest vehicle
at the south VAFB harbor seal haul-out
site, it was required that acoustic and
biological monitoring be conducted for
its first three launches. In addition,
harbor seal hearing tests were required
before and after each of the first three
launches.
The first two Delta IV launches
occurred in 2006. Although the Delta IV
is larger than the Athena, it was found
after its initial launch (NROL–22, June
2006) that the Delta IV had similar noise
levels to the Athena vehicle. As
measured by the DAT, the unweighted
SEL was 127.7 dB, while the CSEL was
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
122.9 dB, and the ASEL was 106.2 dB
(Fillmore et al., 2006). The Lmax was
found to be 103.1 dB (Fillmore et al.,
2006).
During its second launch (DMSP–17,
November 2006), the DAT recorder was
located at the VAFB Boathouse (near
where the harbor seal hearing tests were
performed), rather than at the more
usual sound monitoring location of Oil
Well Canyon, where an SLM was
placed. The DAT measured the
unweighted SEL at 131.3 dB, the CSEL
at 127.5 dB, and the ASEL at 111.3 dB.
The Lmax was measured at 102.6 dB
(Thorson et al., 2007).
The Delta IV was predicted to create
maximum sonic booms of as much as
7.2 psf for the largest of the medium
configurations and 8 to 9 psf for the
heavy configuration (Table 4 in the
application). The size of the actual sonic
boom would depend on meteorological
conditions, which can vary by day and
season, and with the trajectory of the
vehicle. A sonic boom greater than one
psf was predicted for the initial Delta IV
launch, thus acoustic monitoring was
performed on SMI. An equipment
malfunction resulted in uncertainty
regarding the amplitude of the sonic
boom that was recorded for the launch,
and the peak overpressure from the
boom could have ranged from 0.77 psf
to as much as 3.36 psf. The rise time
was able to be determined and was
measured at 8.7 ms. Because a sonic
boom was not predicted for the second
Delta IV launch, monitoring was not
performed on SMI.
Capture attempts of harbor seals for
the initial Delta IV launch were
unsuccessful; therefore, no hearing tests
were performed on seals for that launch.
Capture attempts for the second Delta IV
launch were successful, and hearing
tests were performed. There was no
evidence that the launch noise from the
Delta IV DMSP 17 caused a loss in
harbor seal hearing acuity. However,
given a 2 hr delay in starting the hearing
test due to safety constraints, it is
possible that a mild temporary
threshold shift (TTS) could have been
fully recovered by the time the testing
was started. Even so, no long-term
hearing loss from the Delta IV launch
noise was found (Thorson et al., 2007).
The third Delta IV launch is currently
scheduled for December, 2010.
Appropriate biological and acoustic
monitoring, as well as hearing testing,
are planned for this launch.
Falcon
The Falcon is the launch vehicle for
Space Exploration Technologies (Space
X). Space X is a commercial program
planning to launch small payloads into
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
low earth orbit from VAFB. While it has
not been officially decided (30 SW,
2008a), it is anticipated that Space X
will utilize SLC–4E, instead of SLC–3W
as originally planned (30 SW, 2008c).
The Space X launch vehicle includes
the Falcon I SLV, classified as a lightlift vehicle. It is a two-stage liquid
oxygen and rocket grade kerosene
powered launch vehicle and is 21.3 m
(69.9 ft) in length and 1.7 m (5.6 ft) in
diameter (Space X, 2007). Beginning in
2009, the Falcon 1e vehicle will also be
available. It is also 1.7 m (5.6 ft) in
diameter, but will have an extended first
stage and will be 26.8 m (87.9 ft) in
length (Space X, 2007). The Falcon I has
a thrust of 105,500 lbs (in vacuum) and
the Falcon 1e has 115,000 lbs (in
vacuum) and are capable of delivering
approximately 554 kg (1,221 lbs) into
sun synchronous low earth orbit (Space
X, 2007). The first Falcon launch from
VAFB is currently scheduled for
August, 2009 (30 SW, 2008a).
Minotaur
The Orbital Suborbital Program
launch vehicle, known as Minotaur I, is
launched from SLC–8 on south VAFB
(see Figure 2 in the USAF application),
approximately 2.3 km (1.4 mi) from the
south VAFB haul-out sites. The
Minotaur I is a four stage, all solid
propellant ground launch vehicle
(Orbital Sciences Corporation, 2006a).
The launch vehicle consists of modified
Minuteman II Stage I and Stage II
segments, mated with Pegasus upper
stages (Orbital Sciences Corporation,
2006a). The Minotaur is a small vehicle,
approximately 19.2 m (63 ft) tall (Orbital
Sciences Corporation 2006b), with
approximately 215,000 lbs of thrust.
Two Minotaur launches were
acoustically monitored at VAFB
(January 2000 and July 2000). The
unweighted SEL measurements varied
by 3.5 dB between the two launches and
were measured to be 119.4 and 122.9
dB. The CSELs varied less and were
measured at 116.6 and 117.9 dB. From
the DAT and SLM measurements, the
ASEL ranged from 104.9 to 107.0 dB.
The launch noise reached an Lmax level
of 101.7 and 103.4 dB. No sonic booms
of greater than one psf were predicted
to impact the NCI for these two
launches, nor for a third launch for
which only biological monitoring was
performed at VAFB given that acoustics
had been previously quantified.
Taurus
The Taurus SLV is launched from
576E on north VAFB, approximately 0.5
km (0.3 mi) from the Spur Road harbor
seal haul-out site and 2.3 km (1.4 mi)
from the Purisima Point haul-out site
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77579
(see Figure 3 in the USAF application).
The standard Taurus is a small launch
vehicle, at approximately 24.7 m (81 ft)
tall and is launched in two different
configurations (Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and
standard) with different first stages
providing 500,000 or 400,000 lbs of
thrust, respectively. The different
vehicle configurations have different
thrust characteristics, with the standard
configuration providing less thrust than
DARPA.
The launch noise from five Taurus
launches has been measured near the
Spur Road haul-out site. The Taurus is
the loudest of the launch vehicles at the
Spur Road haul-out site, due to the close
proximity of its launch pad to the haulout site. The unweighted SEL
measurements from the four initially
measured Taurus vehicles ranged from
135.8 to 136.8 and averaged 136.4 dB.
The CSEL measurements were slightly
lower as expected, ranging from 133.8 to
134.8 dB and averaged 134.5 dB. The
ASEL measurements ranged from 123.5
to 128.9 dB with an average of 126.6 dB
(SLM). The Lmax values were measured
to range from 118.3 to 122.9 dB and
averaged 120.9 dB (SLM). No sonic
booms greater than one psf were
predicted to impact the NCI for any of
the six Taurus launches monitored since
1998.
ICBM and Missile Defense Agency
Interceptor and Target Vehicles
There are a variety of small missiles
launched from north VAFB, including
the Minuteman III and several types of
interceptor and target vehicles for the
Missile Defense Agency (MDA)
program. The Peacekeeper missile
program was recently deactivated.
Active missile launch facilities (LFs) are
spread throughout northern VAFB (see
Figure 3 in the application), and are
within approximately 1 to 3.9 km (0.6
to 2.4 mi) of the Lion’s Head haul-out
site, and approximately 11 to 16.5 km
(6.8 to 10.3 mi) north of the Spur Road
and Purisima Point haul-out sites. In
addition to the LFs, Test Pad (TP)-01 is
present on north VAFB. Although not
currently active or associated with a
missile program, MDA may eventually
utilize this pad. The trajectories of ICBM
and MDA launches are generally
westward and therefore do not cause
sonic boom impacts on the NCI.
ICBM: The Minuteman III missile is
an ICBM developed as part of the U.S.
strategic deterrence force. The
Minuteman III is launched from an
underground silo. It is composed of
three rocket motors, and is 18 m (59 ft)
in length by 1.7 m (5.6 ft) in diameter
with a first stage thrust of 202,600 lbs.
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
77580
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
The launch noise from the June 7,
2002, launch from LF–26 (see Figure 3
in the USAF application) was measured
at the Lion’s Head haul-out site. This LF
is approximately 3 km (1.9 mi) away
from the haul-out site. The ASEL
measurement of the launch noise was
100.6 dB and the Lmax value of 98.2 dB.
The launch noise from the May 24,
2000, launch from LF–09 (Figure 3 in
the application) was measured at the
Spur Road haul-out site. At a distance
of over 15 km from LF–09, the
unweighted SEL measurement was
114.7 dB and the CSEL measurement
was 111.6 dB. The ASEL measurement
was 26 dB down from the unweighted
value and was measured at 88.7 dB. The
Lmax was measured to be 83.3 dB.
MDA Interceptor and Target Vehicles:
The MDA continues development of
various systems and elements, including
the Ballistic Missile Defense System
(BMDS), the Ground-based Midcourse
Defense (GMD) element of BMDS, the
Kinetic Energy Interceptor (KEI)
element, and the Air-Borne Laser (ABL)
element.
The BMDS mission is to defend
against threat missiles in each phase or
segment of the missile’s flight. MDA has
been conducting and will continue to
conduct BMDS testing at VAFB through
2014 and beyond.
The GMD element is designed to
protect the U.S. in the event of a limited
ballistic missile attack by destroying the
threat missile in the mid-course phase
of its flight. During the mid-course
phase, which occurs outside the earth’s
atmosphere for medium and long-range
missiles, the missile coasts in a ballistic
trajectory. The missiles are comprised of
a commercially available, solid
propellant booster consisting of two or
three stages, and an exo-atmospheric
kill vehicle or emulator. A two-stage
booster is being added to the current
three-stage booster. The Ground Based
Interceptor (GBI) was previously
approved for launching from VAFB (68
FR 25347, May 12, 2003). GBI flight
tests are planned from LF–23. As a
scheduled risk mitigation, some limited
testing may occur from LF–24 (currently
being refurbished for use).
The second element of BMDS, the KEI
element, includes development of the
KEI booster and its flight tests. MDA
anticipates a minimum of three KEI
launches per year from 2009 to at least
2012. Candidate launch sites include
576E, TP–01, and LF–06.
The third element of BMDS, the ABL
element, is being developed to provide
an effective defense to limited ballistic
missile threats during the boost segment
of an attacking missile’s flight. Under
the ABL program, there could be as
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
many as 10 launches per year. Launches
could occur from LF–06a, which would
be a new LF, yet to be constructed, near
the current LF–06. Possible launch
vehicles could include Black Brant IX,
Hera, Terrier/Orion, two-stage Terrier,
Liquid Fueled Target System (LFTS),
Terrier Lynx, Storm, ARIES, Castor I,
Lance, Patriot PAC–2, STRYPI-II, and
Hermes.
As a part of BMDS testing, MDA
envisions launching a wide variety of
target missiles from VAFB northern LFs
on westerly trajectories. Table 5 in the
USAF application identifies missiles
being considered by MDA for use at
VAFB. Many of the small missiles under
13 m (42.7 ft), including the Hera,
Lance, Patriot As A Target (PAAT),
Black Brant, Terrier, SRTYPI II, Castor
I, Storm, ARIES and Hermes, in addition
to missiles already approved for VAFB
(such as Minuteman missiles and the
three-stage GBIs), and the new
generation of missiles from the MDA,
such as the KEI and the GBI two-stage,
are to be covered under this application
for the five-year programmatic permit
because of their launch site’s proximity
to the Lion’s Head harbor seal pupping
site that was established in 2002.
The LFTS target missile is a singlestage, short range, ballistic missile with
a non-separating payload. The missile is
fueled by kerosene, initiator fuel, and an
oxidizer (Inhibited Red Fuming Nitric
Acid). The Flexible Target Family target
missiles include the LV 2 and the LV 3
missiles, which are solid-fueled.
As shown in Table 5 in the
application, all of the target and
interceptor missiles are smaller than the
Minuteman III or Peacekeeper missiles
previously or currently launched from
VAFB. The MDA notes that the actual
heights of the missiles shown in Table
5 will vary depending on the payload
and associated electronic packages (e.g.,
flight termination system) or special
modifications. Many of the missile types
have interchangeable first or second
stage motors; therefore, most may have
similar noise characteristics, depending
on their configuration. Missiles for
which acoustic measurements have
previously been made, as well as
vehicle size, are included in Table 6 of
the application.
The main missile programs and
missile types are described herein, but
others may be implemented before this
permit expires. The USAF would notify
NMFS of any new missile programs that
would be implemented at VAFB.
Completely new types of missiles would
be monitored acoustically and
biologically, during their first launch,
even if the launch occurs outside of the
pupping season, using the standard
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
launch monitoring protocol for VAFB.
However, configuration changes in
existing missiles would only be
monitored during the pupping season,
as is done for all other missile launches.
The MDA’s BMDS test plans,
including those involving tests from
VAFB, are subject to constant change as
the BMDS is being developed through
spiral evolution. Therefore, it is difficult
for the MDA to predict with accuracy its
future launch schedule or number of
launches over the next five years.
However, due to test resource
limitations, the MDA does not envision
conducting more than three missile tests
per quarter (on average) over the next
five years from VAFB, and none of the
missiles would be larger than the
Minuteman III. This limitation (i.e., one
missile per quarter and none being
larger than the Minuteman III) can be
used to establish the potential impacts
posed by the MDA testing at VAFB over
the next five years.
In order to compare launch noise from
past and current SLVs, as it was
received near the north and south VAFB
marine mammal haul-out sites, Tables 1
through 3 in the USAF application
provide information on the SELs that
were measured during previous launch
events. Table 1 in the application
provides a comparison of SELs as
measured at the sound monitoring site
by the south VAFB marine mammal
haul-out site. Table 2 in the application
provides the SELs as measured at the
sound monitoring site by the north
VAFB Spur Road marine mammal haulout site. Finally, Table 3 in the
application provides the SELs as
measured at the sound monitoring site
by the north VAFB Lion’s Head marine
mammal haul-out site.
Aircraft Operations
The VAFB runway, located on north
VAFB (see Figure 3 in the application),
supports various aircraft operations
further described below. Aircraft
operations include tower operations,
such as take offs and landings (training
operations) from the airfield, and range
operations, such as overflights and flight
tests. Using data from fiscal years (FY)
2003, 2006, and 2007 (FY 2004 and
2005 data are not available), the number
of tower operations averaged 12,325
operations per FY, while range
operations averaged 502 operations per
FY.
Flight Test Operations: VAFB is a
limited site for flight testing and
evaluation of fixed-wing aircraft. Three
approved routes are used that avoid the
established pinniped haul-out sites.
Aircraft flown through VAFB airspace
and supported by 30 SW include, but
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
are not limited to, B1 and B2 bombers,
F–15, F–16, and F–22 fighters, V/X–22,
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, and KC–135
tankers.
Fixed-wing Aircraft Operations:
Various fixed-wing aircraft (jet and
propeller aircraft) use VAFB for a
variety of purposes, including delivery
of space or missile vehicle components,
launching of space vehicles at high
altitude (e.g., the Pegasus), and
emergency landings. All aircraft are
required to remain outside of the 305–
m (1,000–ft) bubble around pinniped
rookeries or haul-out sites, except when
performing a life-or-death rescue
mission, when responding to a security
incident, or during an aircraft
emergency. There have been no
observed impacts to pinnipeds from
fixed-wing aircraft operations during
launch monitoring or pinniped surveys.
Helicopter Operations: The number of
helicopter operations at VAFB
decreased in 2008 with the deactivation
of the VAFB helicopter squadron.
However other squadrons and units
continue to use VAFB for purposes
which include, but are not limited to,
transit through, exercises, and launch
mission support. All helicopters are
required to remain outside of the 305–
m (1,000–ft) bubble around pinniped
rookeries or haul-out sites. Exceptions
may occur when performing a life-ordeath rescue mission, when responding
to a security incident, or during an
aircraft emergency. There have been no
observed impacts to pinnipeds from
helicopter operations during launch
monitoring or pinniped surveys.
Description of Habitat and Marine
Mammals Affected by the Activity
VAFB
VAFB is composed of approximately
99,000 acres of land and approximately
64.4 km (40 mi) of coastline on the coast
of central California, within Santa
Barbara County (see Figure 1 in the
USAF application). The most common
marine mammal inhabiting the VAFB
coastline is the Pacific harbor seal
(Phoca vitulina richardii). Harbor seals
are local to the area, rarely traveling
more than 50 km (31 mi) from the haulout site. They haul out on small offshore
rocks or reefs and sandy or cobblestone
cove beaches. There are four main
harbor seal haul-out sites on VAFB;
three are on north VAFB and one is on
south VAFB.
On north VAFB, harbor seals
primarily use the offshore rocky area
near Spur Road; the Purisima Point reef;
and the offshore rocky area of Lion’s
Head (Figure 3 in the application). The
Spur Road and Purisima Point haul-out
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
sites are in the vicinity of the Delta II
launch site, SLC–2, and the Taurus
launch site, referred to as 576E. The
Lion’s Head haul-out site is located in
the vicinity of the LFs. As many as 110
seals may haul out at Spur Road and as
many as 45 seals may haul out at
Purisima Point (SRS Technologies,
2003b). Based on monthly counts
conducted in 2005 through 2007, only
one to two pups were observed at the
Spur Road and Purisima Point haul-out
sites. As many as 17 seals may haul out
at Lion’s Head, with as many as three
pups (Thorson et al., 2004). These three
sites are mostly to completely under
water at higher tides (above 1.2 m (3.9
ft)), preventing seals from hauling out at
those times.
The main haul-out area on south
VAFB, from the VAFB Harbor north to
South Rocky Point beach, is comprised
of many sand and cobblestone coves
and rocky ledges, with most seals found
between Harbor Seal Beach and South
Rocky Point (approximately 1.5 km (0.9
mi) of coastline; Figure 2 in the
application). The raised rocky ledge of
Flat Iron Rock provides an area to haul
out during most tides (except for very
high tides combined with high swells
and wind); therefore, this area is used
more often and by more seals than any
other VAFB haul-out site. Weaned pups,
juveniles and some adult females use
Weaner Cove, just to the north of Flat
Iron Rock, throughout most of the year.
During periods of high winds, seals may
move from Flat Iron Rock into the more
protected Weaner Cove. Peak numbers,
as many as 515 seals hauled out at one
time (SRS Technologies, 2003b), usually
occur at the south VAFB haul-out site in
the afternoon (1100 to 1600 Pacific
Time), but the number of seals present
is also influenced by a combination of
high tides and large swells, high
temperature, or strong winds (SRS
Technologies, 2003b). During the
pupping season (March through June),
as many as 49 mother-pup pairs can be
found hauled out in the area just north
of Harbor Seal Beach and at Weaner
Cove, making these areas the main
pupping sites on VAFB (SRS
Technologies, 2003b). During molting
(May through July) adult and some
juvenile harbor seals primarily use the
Flat Iron Rock area, while weaned pups,
juveniles and a few adult females use
the coves just north and south of Flat
Iron Rock (SRS Technologies, 2002).
NCI
The Northern Channel Islands (NCI)
are located approximately 50 km (31 mi)
south of the southern point on VAFB
(see Figure 4, inset in the USAF
application). Three islands, San Miguel,
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77581
Santa Cruz, and Santa Rosa, make up
the main NCI, with San Miguel Island
being the primary site for pinniped
rookeries. The NCI are part of the
Channel Islands National Park and the
Channel Islands National Marine
Sanctuary.
San Miguel Island
On SMI, commonly found species of
pinnipeds include California sea lions
(Zalophus californianus), northern
elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris),
northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus)
and Pacific harbor seals. Guadalupe fur
seals (Arctocephalus townsendi) and
Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus)
have bred in the past on SMI, but
sightings have been rare since the mid–
1980’s. The main rookeries of sea lions,
elephant seals and fur seals are found at
Point Bennett on the west end of SMI
(see Figure 4 in the USAF application).
California sea lions occur at Point
Bennett, along the south side of the
island, to Cardwell Point, on the east.
Northern elephant seals occur at Point
Bennett and from Crook Point to
Cardwell Point, with small numbers
along the north coast. Northern fur seals
occur in the Point Bennett area. Harbor
seals occur along the north coast and
from Crook Point to Cardwell Point.
There are approximately 23,000
California sea lion pups (30 SW, 2008c),
over 10,000 elephant seal pups (Lowry,
2002) and over 4,000 fur seal pups born
on SMI each year (Carretta et al., 2007).
Pacific harbor seals pup on the north
and east end of SMI; 2,500 northern
elephant seals and several hundred sea
lions also pup on the east end of SMI
at Cardwell Point (Lowry, 2002). Most
sea lions and elephant seals on the
south and east end of SMI are nonbreeding (juvenile or molting) animals.
This area is composed of high cliffs with
small sandy coves where several
hundred seals haul out. From
approximately December through July,
pupping and breeding activities overlap
between the four main species (see
Table 7 in the application and Table 1
here).
Currently, the main impacts to species
on SMI are: environmental conditions,
food limitations (i.e., El Nino or
fisheries interactions), and competition
with other pinniped species for
breeding space. For all species, adverse
impacts to populations occur
periodically because of a decrease in the
availability of food items due to El Nino
events. Commercial fisheries have
impacted Steller sea lion and northern
fur seal populations (Sydeman and
Allen, 1999). Competition among
pinniped species is occurring as the
growing populations of sea lions and
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
77582
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
elephant seals displace less aggressive
harbor seals for haul-out space.
TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF THE PUPPING (BIRTHING AND NURSING PERIOD), BREEDING, AND MOLTING SEASONS OF THE FOUR
MAIN PINNIPED SPECIES ON SMI.
Species
Pupping Season
Breeding Season
Molting Season
California sea lion
May-July
May-August
August-December
Northern fur seal
May-July
May-July
August-October
December-March
December-March
April-August
March-May
March-June
May-July
Northern elephant seal
Pacific harbor seal
Santa Cruz Island
On Santa Cruz Island the main
species of marine mammal inhabiting
the island is the harbor seal. California
sea lions and northern elephant seals
rarely haul out on Santa Cruz Island,
except when sick or injured. There are
approximately 1,050 harbor seals found
on Santa Cruz Island during the spring
aerial surveys (Lowry and Carretta,
2003). Based on sonic boom prediction
models for previous launches, the
majority of sonic booms produced by
launches from VAFB do not impact
Santa Cruz Island.
Santa Rosa Island
On Santa Rosa Island, the main
species of marine mammals inhabiting
the island are the harbor seal and the
northern elephant seal. In 2001, 1,567
elephant seal pups were born on Santa
Rosa (Lowry, 2002). There are
approximately 900 harbor seals found
on Santa Rosa Island during the spring
aerial surveys (Lowry and Carretta,
2003). Some California sea lions pup on
Santa Rosa, but it has not been
established as a rookery to date.
Pinnipeds generally use the west end of
the island, adjacent to SMI. Based on
sonic boom prediction models for
previous launches, the majority of sonic
booms produced by launches from
VAFB do not impact Santa Rosa Island.
Comments and Responses
On July 25, 2008, NMFS published a
notice of receipt of application for an
LOA in the Federal Register (73 FR
43410) and requested comments and
information from the public for 30 days.
NMFS received comments from the
Marine Mammal Commission
(Commission) and one private citizen.
The Commission supports NMFS’
decision to publish proposed
regulations for the specified activities
provided that the research, mitigation,
and monitoring activities described in
the application and the current
regulations are incorporated into the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
rule. NMFS has incorporated the
research, mitigation, and monitoring
into the proposed rule. The other
comment opposed the issuance of an
authorization without any specific
substantiation for why such an
authorization should not be issued. For
the reasons set forth in this preamble,
NMFS believes issuance of the
authorization is appropriate.
Marine Mammals Potentially Affected
by the Activity
At both VAFB and the NCI, Pacific
harbor seals, California sea lions, and
northern elephant seals haul out on
beaches throughout the year. Northern
fur seals, Steller sea lions, and
Guadalupe fur seals have not been
reported on VAFB. However, northern
fur seals and Guadalupe fur seals can be
found on SMI. Northern fur seals are
only found on the west end of SMI at
Point Bennett and Castle Rock, just
offshore of SMI. Each year at SMI, zero
to two Guadalupe fur seals are seen
generally in the summer (Melin and
DeLong, 1999). Steller sea lions have not
been sighted on SMI since 1998. This
was a single observation of a sub-adult
male in the spring prior to the breeding
season (Thorson et al., 1999a).
Previously, the last observation of a
Steller sea lion was made in the mid–
1980’s.
The USAF has compiled information
on the abundance, status, and
distribution of the species on VAFB and
the NCI from surveys that they have
conducted over the last decade and from
NMFS Stock Assessment Reports
(SARs). This information may be viewed
in the USAF’s LOA application (see
ADDRESSES). Additional information is
available in the NMFS SARs, which are
available at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/pdfs/sars/po2007.pdf.
Potential Effects of Specified Activities
on Marine Mammals
The activities under these regulations
create two types of noise: Continuous
(but short-duration) noise, due mostly to
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
combustion effects of aircraft and
launch vehicles; and impulsive noise,
due to sonic boom effects. Launch
operations are the major source of noise
on the marine environment from VAFB.
The operation of launch vehicle engines
produces significant sound levels.
Generally, noise is generated from four
sources during launches: (1)
Combustion noise from launch vehicle
chambers; (2) jet noise generated by the
interaction of the exhaust jet and the
atmosphere; (3) combustion noise from
the post-burning of combustion
products; and (4) sonic booms. Launch
noise levels are highly dependent on the
type of first-stage booster and the fuel
used to propel the vehicle. Therefore,
there is a great similarity in launch
noise production within each class size
of launch vehicles.
The noise generated by VAFB
activities will result in the incidental
harassment of pinnipeds, both
behaviorally and in terms of
physiological (auditory) impacts. The
noise and visual disturbances from SLV
and missile launches and aircraft and
helicopter operations may cause the
animals to lift their heads, move
towards the water, or enter the water.
The following information provides
background on marine mammal
responses to launch noise that has been
gathered under previous LOAs for these
activities, as well as a scientific research
permit issued to VAFB by NMFS for a
research program (Permit No. 859–
1680–01) to determine the short and
long-term effects of SLV noise and sonic
booms on affected marine mammals.
Marine Mammal Response to Launch
Noise
Seals may leave the haul-out site and
enter the water due to the noise created
by launch vehicles during launch
operations. The percentage of seals
leaving the haul-out increases with
noise level up to approximately 100 dB
ASEL, after which almost all seals leave,
although data have shown that some
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
percentage of seals have remained on
shore during launches. Time-lapse
video photography during four launch
events revealed that the seals that
reacted to the launch noise but did not
leave the haul-out were all adults.
Because adult seals reacted less strongly
than other younger seals, this suggests
that adults had possibly experienced
other launch disturbances and had
habituated to them.
The louder the launch noise, the
longer it took for seals to begin returning
to the haul-out site and for the numbers
to return to pre-launch levels. Seals may
begin to return to the haul-out site
within 2–55 min of the launch
disturbance and the haul-out site
usually returned to pre-launch levels
within 45–120 min. In two past Athena
IKONOS launches with ASELs of 107.3
and 107.8 dB at the closest haul-out site,
seals began to haul-out again
approximately 16–55 min post-launch
(Thorson et al., 1999a; 1999b). In
contrast, noise levels from an Atlas
launch and several Titan II launches
had ASELs ranging from 86.7 to 95.7 dB
at the closest haul-out and seals began
to return to the haul-out site within 2–
8 min post-launch (Thorson and
Francine, 1997; Thorson et al., 2000).
The main concern on the NCI from
VAFB launch activities is potential
impacts from sonic booms created
during launches of SLVs from VAFB.
During the period of 1997 through 2005,
and in 2007 there were no sonic booms
above 2 psf recorded on the NCI. Small
sonic booms between 1 and 2 psf
usually elicit a heads up response or
slow movement toward and entering the
water, particularly for pups. In 2006,
due to an equipment malfunction, there
was uncertainty about the peak
overpressure from the Delta IV NROL–
22 launch, which could have ranged
between 0.77 and 3.36 psf. During the
1996 Titan IV K–22 launch, sonic booms
of 1 to 9.2 psf reached SMI and caused
many sea lions and some elephant seals
to enter the water near the loudest sonic
boom (Stewart et al., 1996). There were
no injuries or mortalities as a result of
that sonic boom or the reactions by
pinnipeds on SMI.
Haul-out Behavior and Population
Dynamics
During the scientific research
program, haul-out behavior was
determined by capturing and attaching
radio frequency transmitters to the hind
flippers of 41 harbor seals. Twenty-four
seals were tagged in the Rocky Point
area of south VAFB, and 17 were tagged
at Point Conception (control site; see
Figure 1 in the USAF application). The
tagged seals ranged in age from pups (4
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
months) through adults. A radio
receiver-scanner and electronic data
logger were stationed on the cliffs above
each haul-out site and recorded the
presence of any radio tagged seal every
15 min while the seals are hauled out
of the water. The time of arrival, time
of departure, and time on shore, could
be calculated from the data collected by
the telemetry system.
The main influence on the daily haulout patterns of harbor seals on south
VAFB was the time of day (r2 = 0.72; n
= 423) rather than tide height (r2 = 0.23;
n = 423), as the peak number of seals
hauled out occurred daily between 1100
and 1700 hours. Haul-out behavior was
also influenced by combinations of high
tide and large swell or high temperature
and no wind. Either of these
combinations may cause seals not to
haul out at all or to leave the haul-out
site early. Seals remained on shore for
8.1 hr plus or minus 1.6 hr (range 1.2
- 14.7 hr). There was no significant
difference in the time of day or duration
of hauling out between south VAFB and
Point Conception (t-test, P>.05).
Site fidelity, which is defined herein
as an individual’s continued use of the
same haul-out area for at least 6 months,
was high at both south VAFB and Point
Conception. The mean site fidelity at
VAFB was 77 percent (adults 84
percent, juveniles 72 percent, and pups
63 percent), and at Point Conception
was 71 percent (adults 81 percent,
juveniles 74 percent, and pups 53
percent). The trend of increasing site
fidelity with age is common in all
harbor seal populations, as young seals
cannot compete for haul-out space with
adults, and move to other less preferred
haul-out sites (Kovacs et al., 1990;
Suryan and Harvey, 1998). There have
been four juveniles tagged at Point
Conception that have moved to VAFB,
but no juveniles have moved from
VAFB to Point Conception.
The total population of harbor seals at
VAFB in 2002 was estimated to be 1,115
(850 on south VAFB and 265 on north
VAFB; SRS Technologies, 2003a), using
telemetry data to correct for seals that
were at sea during the census. A
correction factor of 1.7 times the ground
count was used. From 2000 through
2007 there were three to seven SLV
launches per year (average of 4.4 SLV
launches annually), and there appeared
to be only short-term disturbance effects
to harbor seals as a result of launch
noise. The harbor seal population
increased from 1997 to 2002 at an
annual rate of 12.7 percent; however,
the number of total harbor seals on
south VAFB was lower in 2007 (356
seals) than 2006 (511 seals). The only
decrease in the population during the
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77583
1997 to 2002 period occurred during the
1998 El Nino season, when there was a
13.6 percent decrease from the previous
year. The number of harbor seal pups
observed increased at a rate of 26.7
percent annually through 2003, except
during the El Nino events. The number
of pups on south VAFB continued to
increase from 2004 through 2006 (high
of 53 pups) but fell again in 2007 (38
pups). Pup production grew at a rate of
7.9 percent at Point Conception through
2006, except during El Nino events.
Point Conception has limited area
where females and pups can haul out
without being harassed by other seals or
exposed to high tides and swells. There
are more haul-out areas for females with
pups at VAFB; therefore only an El Nino
type disturbance, which includes
weather and food availability effects,
should affect pup production at VAFB.
Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR)
Tests
To determine if harbor seals
experience changes in their hearing
sensitivity as a result of launch noise,
ABR testing was conducted on 18
harbor seals for four Titan IV launches,
one Taurus launch, and one Delta IV
launch.
Following standard ABR testing
protocol, the ABR was measured from
one ear of each seal using sterile, subdermal, stainless steel electrodes. A
conventional electrode array was used,
and low-level white noise was
presented to the non-tested ear to
reduce any electrical potentials
generated by the non-tested ear. A Biologic Systems Corporation evoked
potential computer was used to produce
the click and an 8 kilohertz (kHz) tone
burst stimuli, through standard
audiometric headphones. Over 1,000
ABR waveforms were collected and
averaged per trial. Initially the stimuli
were presented at sound pressure levels
(SPL) loud enough to obtain a clean
reliable waveform, and then decreased
in 10 dB steps until the response was no
longer reliably observed. Once response
was no longer reliably observed, the
stimuli were then increased in 10 dB
steps to the original SPL. By obtaining
two ABR waveforms at each SPL, it was
possible to quantify the variability in
the measurements.
Good replicable responses were
measured from most of the seals, with
waveforms following the expected
pattern of an increase in latency and
decrease in amplitude of the peaks, as
the stimulus level was lowered. One
seal had substantial decreased acuity to
the 8 kHz tone-burst stimuli prior to the
launch. The cause of this hearing loss
was unknown but was most likely
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
77584
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
congenital or from infection. Another
seal had a great deal of variability in
waveform latencies in response to
identical stimuli. This animal moved
repeatedly during testing, which may
have reduced the sensitivity of the ABR
testing on this animal for both the click
and 8 kHz tone burst stimuli. Two of the
seals were released after pre-launch
testing but prior to the launch of the
Titan IV B–34, as the launch was
delayed for many days, and five days is
the maximum duration permitted to
hold the seals for testing.
Detailed analysis of the changes in
waveform latency and waveform
replication of the ABR measurements
for the 14 seals, showed no detectable
changes in the seals’ hearing sensitivity
as a result of exposure to the launch
noise. The delayed start (1.75 to 3.5 hr
after the launches) for ABR testing
allows for the possibility that the seals
may have recovered from a TTS before
testing began. However, it can be said
with confidence that the post-launch
tested animals did not have permanent
hearing changes due to exposure to the
launch noise from the Titan IV, Taurus,
or Delta IV SLVs. These results are
consistent with previous NMFS
conclusions for such activities in its
prior rulemakings (63 FR 39055, July 21,
1998; 69 FR 5720, February 6, 2004).
NMFS also notes that stress from
long-term cumulative sound exposures
can result in physiological effects on
reproduction, metabolism, and general
health, or on the animals’ resistance to
disease. However, this is not likely to
occur as a result of the activities from
VAFB, because of the infrequent nature
and short duration of the noise,
including the occasional sonic boom.
Research indicates that population
levels at these haul-out sites have
remained constant in recent years,
giving support to this conclusion.
The USAF does not anticipate a
significant impact on any of the species
or stocks of marine mammals from
launches from VAFB. For even the
largest launch vehicles, such as Delta
IV, the launch noises and sonic booms
can be expected to cause a startle
response and flight to water for those
harbor seals, California sea lions and
other pinnipeds that are hauled out on
the coastline of VAFB and on the NCI.
The noise may cause TTS in hearing
depending on exposure levels, but no
PTS is anticipated.
Numbers of Marine Mammals
Estimated to be Taken by Harassment
The marine mammal species NMFS
believes likely to be taken by Level B
harassment incidental to launch and
aircraft and helicopter operations at
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
VAFB are harbor seals, California sea
lions, northern elephant seals, and
northern fur seals. All of these species
are protected under the MMPA, and
none are listed under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA). Numbers of animals
that may be taken by Level B
harassment are expected to vary due to
factors such as type of SLV, location of
the sonic boom, weather conditions
(which can influence the size of the
sonic boom), the time of day, and the
time of year. For this reason, ranges are
given for the harassment estimates of
marine mammals. Aircraft operations
will occur frequently but will avoid
pinniped haul-out areas and are
unlikely to disturb pinnipeds.
As noted earlier, sightings of Steller
sea lions and Guadalupe fur seals have
been extremely rare the last few decades
or low at VAFB and on the NCI.
Therefore, no takes by harassment are
anticipated for either of these species
incidental to the proposed activities.
Estimated Takes at VAFB
Harbor seals: As many as 600 harbor
seals per launch may be taken.
Depending on the type of rocket being
launched, the time of day, time of the
year, weather conditions, tide and swell
conditions, the number of seals that may
be taken will range between 0 and 600.
Launches and aircraft operations may
occur at any time of the year so any age
classes and gender may be taken.
California sea lions: As many as 200
sea lions per launch may be taken. Sea
lions at VAFB are usually juveniles of
both sexes and sub-adult males that
haul out in the fall during the post
breeding dispersal. Births generally do
not occur at VAFB, but five pups were
observed at VAFB in 2003, an El Nino
year, although all were abandoned by
their mothers and died within several
days of birth. Sick or emaciated weaned
pups may also haul out briefly. The
number of sea lions that may be taken
will range between 0 and 200.
Northern elephant seals: As many as
200 elephant seals per launch may be
taken. Weaned elephant seal pups,
juveniles, or young adults of both sexes,
may occasionally haul out at VAFB for
several days to rest or as long as 30 days
to molt. Injured or sick seals may also
haul out briefly. The number of
northern elephant seals that may be
taken will range between 0 and 200.
Northern fur seals: There are no
reports of northern fur seals at VAFB.
Therefore, it is unlikely that any fur
seals will be taken.
Estimated Takes on the NCI
Sonic booms created by SLVs may
impact marine mammals on the NCI,
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
particularly SMI. Missile launches
utilize westward trajectories so do not
cause sonic boom impacts to the NCI.
The PCBoom sonic boom modeling
program will continue to be used to
predict the area of sonic boom impact
and magnitude of the sonic boom on the
NCI based on the launch vehicle, speed,
trajectory, and meteorological
conditions. Prior to each SLV launch, a
predictive sonic boom map of the
impact area and magnitude of the sonic
boom will be generated. Based on
previous monitoring of sonic booms
created by SLVs on SMI (Thorson et al.,
1999a: 1999b), it is estimated that as
much as approximately 25 percent of
the marine mammals may be disturbed
on SMI (Thorson et al., 1999a; 1999b).
Most sonic booms that reach SMI are
small (<1 psf), although larger sonic
booms are possible, but rarely occur. A
conservative take estimate of as much as
25 percent of the animals present is
used for each species per launch.
Harbor seals: As many as 200 harbor
seals of all age classes and sexes may be
taken per launch on the NCI. The
number of harbor seals that may be
taken will range between 0 and 200.
California sea lions: As many as 5,800
sea lion pups and 2,500 juvenile and
adult sea lions of either sex may be
taken on the NCI per launch. The
number of sea lions that may be taken
will range between 0 and 8,300.
Northern elephant seals: As many as
3,000 northern elephant seal pups and
10,000 northern elephant seals of all age
classes and sexes may be taken per
launch on the NCI. The number of
elephant seals that may be taken will
range between 0 and 13,000.
Northern fur seals: As many as 300
northern fur seal pups and 1,100
juvenile and adult northern fur seals of
both sexes may be taken per launch at
SMI. The number of fur seals that may
be taken will range between 0 and
1,400.
With the incorporation of mitigation
measures proposed later in this
document, the USAF and NMFS expect
that only Level B incidental harassment
may occur as a result of the proposed
activities and that these events will
result in no detectable impact on marine
mammal species or stocks or on their
habitats.
Potential Effects of Specified Activities
on Marine Mammal Habitat
Impacts on marine mammal habitat
are part of the consideration in making
a finding of negligible impact on the
species and stocks of marine mammals.
Habitat includes, but is not necessarily
limited to, rookeries, mating grounds,
feeding areas, and areas of similar
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
significance. Only short-term
disturbance of marine mammals is
expected as a result of the proposed
activities. No impacts to marine
mammal habitats are anticipated on
VAFB or the NCI.
Potential Effects of Specified Activities
on Subsistence Needs
NMFS has preliminarily determined
that the issuance of an LOA for USAF
space vehicle and missile launches and
aircraft and helicopter operations at
VAFB would not have an unmitigable
adverse impact on the availability of the
affected species or stocks for subsistence
use since there are no such uses for
these pinniped species in California.
Mitigation
To minimize impacts on pinnipeds on
beach haul-out sites and to avoid any
possible sensitizing or predisposing of
pinnipeds to greater responsiveness
towards the sights and sounds of a
launch, the USAF has prepared the
following mitigation measures.
All aircraft and helicopter flight paths
must maintain a minimum distance of
1,000 ft (305 m) from recognized seal
haul-outs and rookeries (e.g., Point Sal,
Purisima Point, Rocky Point), except in
emergencies or for real-time security
incidents (e.g., search-and-rescue, firefighting) which may require
approaching pinniped haul-outs and
rookeries closer than 1,000 ft (305 m).
For missile and rocket launches, unless
constrained by other factors including,
but not limited to, human safety,
national security concerns or launch
trajectories, holders of LOAs must
schedule launches to avoid, whenever
possible, launches during the harbor
seal pupping season of March through
June. NMFS also proposes to expand the
requirement so that the USAF must
avoid, whenever possible, launches
which are predicted to produce a sonic
boom on the NCI during harbor seal,
elephant seal, California sea lion, and
northern fur seal pupping seasons.
If post-launch surveys determine that
an injurious or lethal take of a marine
mammal has occurred, the launch
procedure and the monitoring methods
must be reviewed, in cooperation with
NMFS, and appropriate changes must be
made through modification to an LOA,
prior to conducting the next launch of
the same vehicle under that LOA.
Monitoring
As part of its application, the USAF
provided a monitoring plan, similar to
that in the current regulations (50 CFR
216.125), for assessing impacts to
marine mammals from rocket and
missile launches at VAFB. This
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
monitoring plan is described, in detail,
in their application (30 SW, 2008c). The
USAF will conduct the following
monitoring under the regulations.
The monitoring will be conducted by
a NMFS-approved marine mammal
biologist experienced in surveying large
numbers of marine mammals.
Monitoring at the haul-out site closest to
the launch facility will commence at
least 72 hours prior to the launch and
continue until at least 48 hours after the
launch.
Monitoring for VAFB
Biological monitoring at VAFB will be
conducted for all launches during the
harbor seal pupping season, 1 March to
30 June. Acoustic and biological
monitoring will be conducted on new
space and missile launch vehicles
during at least the first launch, whether
it occurs within the pupping season or
not. Also, the third Delta IV launch will
be monitored, and ABR testing of seals
in close proximity to the launch is
planned. The testing will be authorized
under a scientific research permit issued
under Section 104 of the MMPA. Such
work is currently conducted under
Permit No. 859–1680–01, which expires
on January 1, 2009. The USAF has
submitted an application to NMFS for
issuance of a new scientific research
permit to continue the ABR tests, as
well as other research projects. The ABR
tests would be required once NMFS
issues the Section 104 research permit.
NMFS estimates that the tests would be
required for years 2–5 of these proposed
regulations.
Monitoring will include multiple
surveys each day that record, when
possible, the species, number of
animals, general behavior, presence of
pups, age class, gender, and reaction to
launch noise, sonic booms, or other
natural or human-caused disturbances.
Environmental conditions such as tide,
wind speed, air temperature, and swell
will also be recorded. Time-lapse
photography or video will be used
during daylight launches to document
the behavior of mother-pup pairs during
launch activities. For launches during
the harbor seal pupping season (March
through June), follow-up surveys will be
made within 2 weeks of the launch to
ensure that there were no adverse effects
on any marine mammals. A report
detailing the species, number of animals
observed, behavior, reaction to the
launch noise, time to return to the haulout site, any adverse behavior and
environmental conditions will be
submitted to NMFS within 90 days of
the launch.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77585
Monitoring for the NCI
Monitoring will be conducted on the
NCI (San Miguel, Santa Cruz, and Santa
Rosa Islands) whenever a sonic boom
over 1 psf is predicted (using the most
current sonic boom modeling programs)
to impact one of the Islands. Monitoring
will be conducted at the haul-out site
closest to the predicted sonic boom
impact area. Monitoring will be
conducted by a NMFS-approved marine
mammal biologist experienced in
surveying large numbers of marine
mammals. Monitoring will commence at
least 72 hours prior to the launch and
continue until at least 48 hours after the
launch.
Monitoring will include multiple
surveys each day that record the
species, number of animals, general
behavior, presence of pups, age class,
gender, and reaction to launch noise,
sonic booms, or other natural or humancaused disturbances. Environmental
conditions such as tide, wind speed, air
temperature, and swell will also be
recorded. Due to the large numbers of
pinnipeds found on some beaches of
SMI, smaller focal groups should be
monitored in detail rather than the
entire beach population. A general
estimate of the entire beach population
should be made once a day and their
reaction to the launch noise noted.
Photography or video will be used
during daylight launches to document
the behavior of mother-pup pairs or
dependent pups during launch
activities. During the pupping season of
any species affected by a launch, followup surveys will be made within 2 weeks
of the launch to ensure that there were
no adverse effects on any marine
mammals. A report detailing the
species, number of animals observed,
behavior, reaction to the launch noise,
time to return to the haul-out site, any
adverse behavior and environmental
conditions will be submitted to NMFS
within 90 days of the launch.
Reporting
A report containing the following
information must be submitted to NMFS
within 90 days after each launch: (1)
Date(s) and time(s) of each launch; (2)
date(s), location(s), and preliminary
findings of any research activities
related to monitoring the effects on
launch noise and sonic booms on
marine mammal populations; and (3)
results of the monitoring programs,
including but not necessarily limited to
(a) numbers of pinnipeds present on the
haul-out prior to commencement of the
launch, (b) numbers of pinnipeds that
may have been harassed as noted by the
number of pinnipeds estimated to have
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
77586
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
entered the water as a result of launch
noise, (c) the length of time(s) pinnipeds
remained off the haul-out or rookery, (d)
the numbers of pinniped adults or pups
that may have been injured or killed as
a result of the launch, and (4) any
behavioral modifications by pinnipeds
that likely were the result of launch
noise or the sonic boom.
If a freshly dead or seriously injured
pinniped is found during post-launch
monitoring, the incident must be
reported within 48 hours to the NMFS
Office of Protected Resources and the
NMFS Southwest Regional Office.
An annual report must be submitted
to NMFS at the time of renewal of the
LOA described in § 216.127, that
describes any incidental takings under
an LOA not reported in the 90–day
launch reports, such as the aircraft test
program and helicopter operations and
any assessments made of their impacts
on hauled-out pinnipeds.
A final report must be submitted to
NMFS no later than 180 days prior to
expiration of these regulations. This
report must summarize the findings
made in all previous reports and assess
both the impacts at each of the major
rookeries and the cumulative impact on
pinnipeds and any other marine
mammals from Vandenberg activities.
Coastal Zone Management Act
Consistency
ESA
NMFS has preliminarily determined
that the launching of SLVs, ICBMs, and
small missiles and aircraft and
helicopter operations at VAFB, as
described in this document and in the
application for regulations and
subsequent LOAs, will result in no more
than Level B harassment of harbor seals,
California sea lions, northern elephant
seals, and northern fur seals. The effects
of these military readiness activities
from VAFB will be limited to short term
and localized changes in behavior,
including temporarily vacating haulouts, and possible TTS in the hearing of
any pinnipeds that are in close
proximity to a launch pad at the time of
a launch. NMFS has also preliminarily
determined that any takes will have no
more than a negligible impact on the
affected species and stocks. No take by
injury and/or death is anticipated, and
the potential for permanent hearing
impairment is unlikely. Harassment
takes will be at the lowest level
practicable due to incorporation of the
mitigation measures mentioned
previously in this document. NMFS has
proposed regulations for these exercises
that prescribe the means of affecting the
least practicable adverse impact on
marine mammals and their habitat and
set forth requirements pertaining to the
In December, 2003, NMFS determined
that these activities are not likely to
adversely affect any species or their
habitats that are listed as threatened or
endangered under the ESA. Therefore,
consultation under section 7 of the ESA
is not required.
NEPA
The USAF prepared a Final EA and
issued a Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) in 1997 as part of its
application for an incidental take
authorization. On March 1, 1999 (64 FR
9925), NMFS adopted this EA as
provided for by the Council on
Environmental Quality regulations. In
2003, NMFS prepared its own EA and
issued a FONSI for the final rule issued
in February, 2004. NMFS has prepared
a new Draft EA for issuance of
regulations and annual LOAs to the
USAF for these proposed activities. The
Draft EA will be made available for
public comment concurrently with
these proposed regulations (see
ADDRESSES). NMFS will either finalize
the EA and prepare a FONSI or prepare
an Environmental Impact Statement
prior to issuance of the final rule.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:16 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
The USAF conducts separate
consultations with the California
Coastal Commission (CCC) for each
launch activity, as each one is
considered a separate Federal action.
Past consultations between the USAF
and the CCC have indicated that
activities from VAFB similar to those
described in this document are
consistent to the maximum extent
practicable with the enforceable policies
of the California Coastal Act (CCA). The
USAF is in consultation with the CCC
for those launch activities that have not
yet been found to be consistent with the
CCA. Therefore, NMFS has
preliminarily determined that the
activities described in this document are
consistent to the maximum extent
practicable with the enforceable policies
of the CCA.
National Marine Sanctuaries Act
NMFS has preliminarily determined
that this action is not likely to destroy,
cause the loss of, or injure any national
marine sanctuary resources. NMFS will
conclude any necessary consultation
with the National Ocean Service’s Office
of National Marine Sanctuaries prior to
issuance of the final rule.
Preliminary Determinations
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
monitoring and reporting of that taking.
Additionally, the launch activities and
aircraft and helicopter operations will
not have an unmitigable adverse impact
on the availability of marine mammal
stocks for subsistence use, as there are
no subsistence uses of these four
pinniped species in California waters.
Classification
Pursuant to the procedures
established to implement section 6 of
Executive Order 12866, the Office of
Management and Budget has
determined that this proposed rule is
not significant.
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Chief
Counsel for Regulation of the
Department of Commerce has certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The 30th SW, USAF, is the entity that
will be affected by this rulemaking, not
a small governmental jurisdiction, small
organization or small business, as
defined by the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. As a result, NMFS concludes the
action would not result in a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 216
Exports, Fish, Imports, Indians,
Labeling, Marine mammals, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Seafood, Transportation.
Dated: December 15, 2008.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Operations, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
For reasons set forth in the preamble,
50 CFR part 216 is proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 216—REGULATIONS
GOVERNING THE TAKE OF MARINE
MAMMALS INCIDENTAL TO
SPECIFIED ACTIVITIES
1. The authority citation for part 216
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.
2. Subpart K is added to part 216 to
read as follows:
Subpart K—Taking Of Marine Mammals
Incidental To Space Vehicle And Test Flight
Activities
Sec.
216.120 Specified activity and specified
geographical region.
216.121 Effective dates.
216.122 Permissible methods of taking.
216.123 Prohibitions.
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
216.124 Mitigation.
216.125 Requirements for monitoring and
reporting.
216.126 Applications for Letters of
Authorization.
216.127 Letters of Authorization.
216.128 Renewal of Letters of
Authorization.
216.129 Modifications of Letters of
Authorization.
Subpart K—Taking Of Marine
Mammals Incidental To Space Vehicle
And Test Flight Activities
§ 216.120 Specified activity and specified
geographical region.
(a) Regulations in this subpart apply
only to the incidental taking of those
marine mammals specified in paragraph
(b) of this section by the 30th Space
Wing, United States Air Force, and
those persons it authorizes to engage in:
(1) Launching up to 30 space and
missiles vehicles each year from
Vandenberg Air Force Base, for a total
of up to 150 missiles and rockets over
the 5–year period of these regulations,
(2) Launching up to 20 rockets each
year from Vandenberg Air Force Base,
for a total of up to 100 rocket launches
over the 5–year period of these
regulations,
(3) Aircraft flight test operations, and
(4) Helicopter operations from
Vandenberg Air Force Base.
(b) The incidental take of marine
mammals on Vandenberg Air Force Base
and in waters off southern California,
under the activity identified in
paragraph (a) of this section, is limited
to the following species: Harbor seals
(Phoca vitulina); California sea lions
(Zalophus californianus); northern
elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris);
and northern fur seals (Callorhinus
ursinus).
§ 216.121
Effective dates.
Regulations in this subpart are
effective from February 7, 2009, through
February 6, 2014.
§ 216.122
Permissible methods of taking.
(a) Under Letters of Authorization
issued pursuant to § 216.106 and
216.127, the 30th Space Wing, U.S. Air
Force, its contractors, and clients, may
incidentally, but not intentionally, take
marine mammals by harassment, within
the area described in § 216.120,
provided the activity is in compliance
with all terms, conditions, and
requirements of these regulations and
the appropriate Letter of Authorization.
(b) The taking of marine mammals is
authorized for the species listed in
§ 216.120(b) and is limited to Level B
Harassment.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
§ 216.123
Prohibitions.
Notwithstanding takings
contemplated in § 216.120 and
authorized by a Letter of Authorization
issued under §§ 216.106 and 216.127,
no person in connection with the
activities described in § 216.120 may:
(a) Take any marine mammal not
specified in § 216.120(b);
(b) Take any marine mammal
specified in § 216.120(b) other than by
incidental, unintentional harassment;
(c) Take a marine mammal specified
in § 216.120(b) if such taking results in
more than a negligible impact on the
species or stocks of such marine
mammal; or
(d) Violate, or fail to comply with, the
terms, conditions, and requirements of
this subpart or a Letter of Authorization
issued under §§ 216.106 and 216.127.
§ 216.124
Mitigation.
(a) The activity identified in
§ 216.120(a) must be conducted in a
manner that minimizes, to the greatest
extent practicable, adverse impacts on
marine mammals and their habitats.
When conducting operations identified
in § 216.120(a), the mitigation measures
contained in the Letter of Authorization
issued under §§ 216.106 and 216.127
must be implemented. These mitigation
measures include (but are not limited
to):
(1) All aircraft and helicopter flight
paths must maintain a minimum
distance of 1,000 ft (305 m) from
recognized seal haul-outs and rookeries
(e.g., Point Sal, Purisima Point, Rocky
Point), except in emergencies or for realtime security incidents (e.g., search-andrescue, fire-fighting), which may require
approaching pinniped haul-outs and
rookeries closer than 1,000 ft (305 m).
(2) For missile and rocket launches,
holders of Letters of Authorization must
avoid, whenever possible, launches
during the harbor seal pupping season
of March through June, unless
constrained by factors including, but not
limited to, human safety, national
security, or for space vehicle launch
trajectory necessary to meet mission
objectives.
(3) Vandenberg Air Force Base must
avoid, whenever possible, launches
which are predicted to produce a sonic
boom on the Northern Channel Islands
during harbor seal, elephant seal,
California sea lion, and northern fur seal
pupping seasons of March through June.
(4) If post-launch surveys determine
that an injurious or lethal take of a
marine mammal has occurred, the
launch procedure and the monitoring
methods must be reviewed, in
cooperation with the National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS), and
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77587
appropriate changes must be made
through modification to a Letter of
Authorization, prior to conducting the
next launch under that Letter of
Authorization.
(5) Additional mitigation measures as
contained in a Letter of Authorization.
(b) [Reserved]
§ 216.125 Requirements for monitoring
and reporting.
(a) Holders of Letters of Authorization
issued pursuant to §§ 216.106 and
216.127 for activities described in
§ 216.120(a) are required to cooperate
with NMFS, and any other Federal, state
or local agency with authority to
monitor the impacts of the activity on
marine mammals. Unless specified
otherwise in the Letter of Authorization,
the Holder of the Letter of Authorization
must notify the Administrator,
Southwest Region, NMFS, by letter or
telephone, at least 2 weeks prior to
activities possibly involving the taking
of marine mammals. If the authorized
activity identified in § 216.120(a) is
thought to have resulted in the mortality
or injury of any marine mammals or in
any take of marine mammals not
identified in § 216.120(b), then the
Holder of the Letter of Authorization
must notify the Director, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, or
designee, by telephone (301–713–2289),
within 48 hours of the discovery of the
injured or dead animal.
(b) Holders of Letters of Authorization
must designate qualified, on-site
individuals approved in advance by
NMFS, as specified in the Letter of
Authorization, to:
(1) Conduct observations on harbor
seal, elephant seal, and sea lion activity
in the vicinity of the rookery nearest the
launch platform or, in the absence of
pinnipeds at that location, at another
nearby haul-out, for at least 72 hours
prior to any planned launch occurring
during the harbor seal pupping season
(1 March through 30 June) and continue
for a period of time not less than 48
hours subsequent to launching.
(2) For launches during the harbor
seal pupping season (March through
June), conduct follow-up surveys within
2 weeks of the launch to ensure that
there were no adverse effects on any
marine mammals,
(3) Monitor haul-out sites on the
Northern Channel Islands, if it is
determined by modeling that a sonic
boom of greater than 1 psf could occur
in those areas (this determination will
be made in consultation with NMFS),
(4) Investigate the potential for
spontaneous abortion, disruption of
effective female-neonate bonding, and
other reproductive dysfunction,
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
77588
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(5) Supplement observations on
Vandenberg and on the Northern
Channel Islands with video-recording of
mother-pup seal responses for daylight
launches during the pupping season,
(6) Conduct acoustic measurements of
those launch vehicles that have not had
sound pressure level measurements
made previously, and
(7) Include multiple surveys each day
that surveys are required that record the
species, number of animals, general
behavior, presence of pups, age class,
gender and reaction to launch noise,
sonic booms or other natural or human
caused disturbances, in addition to
recording environmental conditions
such as tide, wind speed, air
temperature, and swell.
(c) Holders of Letters of Authorization
must conduct additional monitoring as
required under an annual Letter of
Authorization.
(d) Holders of Letters of Authorization
must submit a report to the Southwest
Administrator, NMFS, within 90 days
after each launch. This report must
contain the following information:
(1) Date(s) and time(s) of the launch,
(2) Design of the monitoring program,
and
(3) Results of the monitoring program,
including, but not necessarily limited
to:
(i) Numbers of pinnipeds present on
the haul-out prior to commencement of
the launch,
(ii) Numbers of pinnipeds that may
have been harassed as noted by the
number of pinnipeds estimated to have
entered the water as a result of launch
noise,
(iii) The length of time pinnipeds
remained off the haul-out or rookery,
(iv) Numbers of pinniped adults,
juveniles or pups that may have been
injured or killed as a result of the
launch, and
(v) Behavioral modifications by
pinnipeds that were likely the result of
launch noise or the sonic boom.
(e) An annual report must be
submitted at the time of renewal of the
Letter of Authorization.
(f) A final report must be submitted at
least 180 days prior to expiration of
these regulations. This report will:
(1) Summarize the activities
undertaken and the results reported in
all previous reports,
(2) Assess the impacts at each of the
major rookeries,
(3) Assess the cumulative impacts on
pinnipeds and other marine mammals
from Vandenberg activities, and
(4) State the date(s), location(s), and
findings of any research activities
related to monitoring the effects on
launch noise and sonic booms on
marine mammal populations.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
§ 216.126 Applications for Letters of
Authorization.
(a) To incidentally take marine
mammals pursuant to these regulations,
the U.S. citizen (as defined by
§ 216.103) conducting the activity
identified in § 216.120(a) (30th Space
Wing, U.S. Air Force) must apply for
and obtain either an initial Letter of
Authorization in accordance with
§ 216.127 or a renewal under § 216.128.
(b) The application must be submitted
to NMFS at least 30 days before the
activity is scheduled to begin.
(c) Applications for a Letter of
Authorization and for renewals of
Letters of Authorization must include
the following:
(1) Name of the U.S. citizen
requesting the authorization,
(2) A description of the activity, the
dates of the activity, and the specific
location of the activity, and
(3) Plans to monitor the behavior and
effects of the activity on marine
mammals.
(d) A copy of the Letter of
Authorization must be in the possession
of the persons conducting activities that
may involve incidental takings of
pinnipeds.
§ 216.127
Letters of Authorization.
(a) A Letter of Authorization, unless
suspended or revoked, will be valid for
a period of time not to exceed the period
of validity of this subpart, but must be
renewed annually subject to annual
renewal conditions in § 216.128.
(b) Each Letter of Authorization will
set forth:
(1) Permissible methods of incidental
taking;
(2) Means of effecting the least
practicable adverse impact on the
species, its habitat, and on the
availability of the species for
subsistence uses (i.e., mitigation); and
(3) Requirements for mitigation,
monitoring and reporting.
(c) Issuance and renewal of the Letter
of Authorization will be based on a
determination that the total number of
marine mammals taken by the activity
as a whole will have no more than a
negligible impact on the affected species
or stock of marine mammal(s).
§ 216.128 Renewal of Letters of
Authorization.
(a) A Letter of Authorization issued
under § 216.106 and § 216.127 for the
activity identified in § 216.120(a) will be
renewed annually upon:
(1) Notification to NMFS that the
activity described in the application
submitted under § 216.126 will be
undertaken and that there will not be a
substantial modification to the
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
described work, mitigation or
monitoring undertaken during the
upcoming 12 months;
(2) Timely receipt of the monitoring
reports required under § 216.125(d) and
(e), and the Letter of Authorization
issued under § 216.127, which has been
reviewed and accepted by NMFS; and
(3) A determination by NMFS that the
mitigation, monitoring and reporting
measures required under §§ 216.124 and
216.125 and the Letter of Authorization
issued under §§ 216.106 and 216.127,
were undertaken and will be undertaken
during the upcoming annual period of
validity of a renewed Letter of
Authorization.
(b) If a request for a renewal of a
Letter of Authorization issued under
§§ 216.106 and 216.128 indicates that a
substantial modification to the
described work, mitigation or
monitoring undertaken during the
upcoming season will occur, NMFS will
provide the public a period of 30 days
for review and comment on the request.
Review and comment on renewals of
Letters of Authorization are restricted
to:
(1) New cited information and data
indicating that the determinations made
in this document are in need of
reconsideration, and
(2) Proposed changes to the mitigation
and monitoring requirements contained
in these regulations or in the current
Letter of Authorization.
(c) A notice of issuance or denial of
a renewal of a Letter of Authorization
will be published in the Federal
Register.
§ 216.129 Modifications of Letters of
Authorization.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, no substantive
modification (including withdrawal or
suspension) to the Letter of
Authorization by NMFS, issued
pursuant to §§ 216.106 and 216.127 and
subject to the provisions of this subpart
shall be made until after notification
and an opportunity for public comment
has been provided. For purposes of this
paragraph, a renewal of a Letter of
Authorization under § 216.128, without
modification (except for the period of
validity), is not considered a substantive
modification.
(b) If the Assistant Administrator
determines that an emergency exists
that poses a significant risk to the wellbeing of the species or stocks of marine
mammals specified in§ 216.120(b), a
Letter of Authorization issued pursuant
to §§ 216.106 and 216.127 may be
substantively modified without prior
notification and an opportunity for
public comment. Notification will be
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
published in the Federal Register
within 30 days subsequent to the action.
[FR Doc. E8–30237 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted to Rodney R.
McInnis at the address listed above and
by e-mail to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to
(202) 395–7285.
[Docket No. 080226308–81499–01]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chris Fanning, Permits Coordinator,
Sustainable Fisheries Division, NMFS,
562–980–4198.
RIN 0648–AW50
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
50 CFR Part 660
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Highly Migratory Species Fisheries
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: NMFS issues a proposed rule
to initiate collection of a permit fee for
vessel owners participating in
commercial and charter recreational
fishing for highly migratory species
(HMS) in the Exclusive Economic Zone
(EEZ) off the West Coast of California,
Oregon, and Washington. The HMS
permits are issued under implementing
regulations for the Fishery Management
Plan for U.S. West Coast Fisheries for
Highly Migratory Species (HMS FMP).
DATES: Comments must be received by
January 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by 0648–AW50, by any one of
the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal https://
www.regulations.gov
• Fax: 562–980–4047, Attn: Chris
Fanning, Permits Coordinator.
• Mail: Rodney R. McInnis, Regional
Administrator, Southwest Region,
NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite
4200, Long Beach, CA 90802 4213.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter N/
A in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
On April
7, 2004, NMFS published a final rule to
implement the HMS FMP (69 FR 18444)
that included mandatory permit
requirements at 50 CFR 660.707. At the
time, there was no cost passed on to the
vessel owners for the preparation and
issuance of the permit. NMFS now
proposes to charge an administrative fee
for the recovery of HMS permit
processing and issuance expenses.
NMFS initiates rulemaking for this
action pursuant to procedures
established at 50 CFR 660.717(d) of the
implementing regulations for the HMS
FMP.
This proposed rule would specify that
an application for an HMS permit,
including the renewal of an existing
permit, would include a fee payable by
the vessel owner. The fee amount
required will be determined in
accordance with the NOAA Finance
Handbook available at (https://
www.corporateservices.noaa.gov/
∼finance/FinanceHandbook.htm) and
specified on the application form. The
fee amount is expected to be
approximately $30-$40 at this time.
Background
Section 303(b)(1) of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (MSA), 16 U.S.C.
1853(b)(1), authorizes the inclusion of a
requirement for permit fees in fishery
management plans. Section 304(d) of
the MSA specifies that such fees may
not exceed the administrative costs of
issuing the permits. Historically, only
some fishery management plans have
authorized the collection of permit fees,
resulting in a set of inconsistent permit
fee policies around the country. NMFS
has issued a policy directive (No. 30–
120, effective January 3, 2005 and
renewed in 2007) to establish a more
consistent agency permit program that
recovers the expense of permit
processing and issuance for all permits
issued by NMFS to the extent
authorized by law. Policy directive No.
30–120 is available at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/directives/.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77589
In this case, the original Fishery
Management Plan for U.S. West Coast
Fisheries for Highly Migratory Species,
as approved by NOAA in 2004, already
included authority to collect permit
fees. NMFS proposes to exercise this
authority through this rulemaking.
Classification
NMFS has determined that this
proposed rule is consistent with the
HMS FMP and preliminarily
determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act and other applicable laws, subject to
public review and comment.
Information collection requirements
for HMS Permits have been previously
approved by OMB under the Southwest
Region Family of Forms (OMB Control
Number 0648–0204). This approval is
valid through April 30, 2010. An
amendment to this approved collection
of information has been submitted and
is undergoing review by OMB. The
amendment would incorporate the
permit fee collection component of this
proposed rule, if finalized. Public
reporting burden for the payment of
HMS permit fees is estimated to average
5 minutes or less per response,
including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection information.
Public comment is sought regarding:
whether this proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the burden estimate;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Send comments
on these or any other aspects of the
collection of information to NMFS
Southwest Region at the ADDRESSES
above, and by e-mail to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov or fax to
(202) 395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, and no person shall be
subject to penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 245 (Friday, December 19, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77577-77589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-30237]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 216
[Docket No. 0808041027-81574-01]
RIN 0648-AX08
Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to Space Vehicle and Test Flight Activities from Vandenberg
Air Force Base (VAFB), California
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS has received a request from the U.S. Air Force (USAF)
for authorization for the take of marine mammals, by harassment,
incidental to launching space launch vehicles, intercontinental
ballistic and small missiles, and aircraft and helicopter operations at
VAFB. By this document, NMFS is proposing regulations to govern that
take. In order to issue a Letter of Authorization (LOA) and issue final
regulations governing the take, NMFS must determine that the taking
will have a negligible impact on the species or stocks and will not
have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of such species
or stock for taking for subsistence uses. NMFS must also prescribe the
means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact on such species
or stock and their habitats.
DATES: Comments and information must be received no later than January
5, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by 0648-AX08, by any one
of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Hand delivery or mailing of paper, disk, or CD-ROM
comments should be addressed to P. Michael Payne, Chief, Permits,
Conservation and Education Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver
Spring, MD 20910-3225.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter N/A in the required
fields if you wish to remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
A copy of the application containing a list of references used in
this document and the Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) may be
obtained by writing to the above address, by telephoning the contact
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, or on the Internet at:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm#applications.
Documents cited in this proposed rule may also be viewed, by
appointment, during regular business hours at the above address. To
help NMFS process and review comments more efficiently, please use only
one method to submit comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Candace Nachman, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 713-2289, ext. 156.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct the Secretary of Commerce
(Secretary) to allow, upon request, the incidental, but not intentional
taking of small numbers of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage
in a specified activity (other than commercial fishing) within a
specified geographical region if certain findings are made and either
regulations are issued or, if the taking is limited to harassment,
notice of a proposed authorization is provided to the public for
review.
Authorization for incidental takings may be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for certain subsistence uses,
and that the permissible methods of taking and requirements pertaining
to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such taking are set
forth.
NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as:
an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.
The National Defense Authorization Act of 2004 (NDAA) (Public Law
108-136) removed the ``small numbers'' and ``specified geographical
region'' limitations and amended the definition of ``harassment'' as it
applies to a ``military readiness activity'' to read as follows
(Section 3(18)(B) of the MMPA):
(i) any act that injures or has the significant potential to
injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild [Level A
Harassment]; or (ii) any act that disturbs or is likely to disturb a
marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of natural behavioral patterns, including, but not
limited to, migration, surfacing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering, to a point where such behavioral patterns are abandoned
or significantly altered [Level B Harassment].
Summary of Request
On March 21, 2008, NMFS received an application from the USAF
requesting authorization for the take of four species of marine mammals
incidental to space vehicle and test flight activities from VAFB, which
would impact pinnipeds on VAFB and the Northern Channel Islands (NCI).
NMFS proposes regulations to govern these activities, to be effective
from February 7, 2009, through February 6, 2014. These regulations, if
implemented, would allow NMFS to issue annual LOAs to the USAF. The
current regulations and LOA expire on February 6, 2009. These training
activities are classified as military readiness activities. Marine
mammals may be exposed to continuous noise due mostly to combustion
effects of aircraft and launch vehicles and impulsive noise due to
sonic boom effects. The USAF requests authorization to take four
pinniped species by Level B Harassment.
Description of the Specified Activity
VAFB (see Figure 1 in the USAF application) is headquarters to the
30th Space Wing (SW), the Air Force Space Command unit that operates
VAFB and the Western Range. VAFB operates as a missile test base and
aerospace center, supporting west coast space launch activities for the
USAF, Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, and commercial contractors. VAFB is the main west coast
launch facility for placing commercial, government, and military
[[Page 77578]]
satellites into polar orbit on expendable (unmanned) launch vehicles,
and for testing and evaluation of intercontinental ballistic missiles
(ICBM) and sub-orbital target and interceptor missiles. In addition to
space vehicle and missile launch activities at VAFB, there are
helicopter and aircraft operations for purposes such as search-and-
rescue, delivery of space vehicle components, launch mission support,
and security reconnaissance. The USAF expects to launch a maximum of 30
rockets and missiles per year from VAFB.
There are currently six active space launch vehicle (SLV)
facilities at VAFB (VAFB, 2007), used to launch satellites into polar
orbit. These facilities support the launch programs for space vehicles
including the Atlas V, Delta II, Delta IV, Falcon, Minotaur, and
Taurus. The Falcon has yet to launch from VAFB and is scheduled for its
first launch in August, 2009 (30 SW, 2008a). Details on the vehicle
types and the sound exposure levels (SELs) produced by each missile or
rocket are described in the following sections.
Atlas V
The Atlas V vehicle is launched from Space Launch Complex (SLC)-3E
on south VAFB, the site of the previous Atlas IIAS program. This SLC is
approximately 9.9 km (6.2 mi) from the main haul-out area on VAFB,
known as Rocky Point (see Figure 2 in the USAF application), which
encompasses several smaller haul-outs. SLC-3E is approximately 11.1 km
(6.9 mi) from the closest north VAFB haul-out, known as the Spur Road
haul-out site (Figure 3 in the application) and 13.5 km (8.4 mi) from
the next closest haul-out, the nearby Purisima Point haul-out site
(Figure 3 in the application).
The Atlas V is a medium lift vehicle that can be flown in two
series of configurations - the Atlas V400 series and the Atlas V500
series. Both series use the Standard Booster as the single body
booster. The V400 series accommodates a 4.2 m (13.8 ft) payload fairing
and as many as three solid rocket boosters. The V500 series
accommodates a 5.4 m (17.7 ft) fairing and as many as five solid rocket
boosters. The Atlas V400 series will lift as much as 7,800 kg (17,196
lbs) into geosynchronous transfer orbit or as much as 13,620 kg (30,027
lbs) into low earth orbit. The Atlas V500 series will lift as much as
8,700 kg (19,180 lbs) into geosynchronous transfer orbit or as much as
21,050 kg (46,407 lbs) into low earth orbit. The Atlas V consists of a
common booster core (CBC; 3.8 m (12.5 ft) in diameter and 32.5 m (106.6
ft) high) powered by an RD180 engine that burns a liquid propellant
fuel consisting of liquid oxygen and RP1 fuel (kerosene). The RD180
engine provides 840,000 lbs of thrust on liftoff. There is a Centaur
upper stage (3.1 m (10.2 ft) in diameter and 12.7 m (41.7 ft) high)
powered by a liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen fuel.
The first Atlas V launch occurred on March 13, 2008. Acoustic
monitoring was conducted for this launch at VAFB. However, an equipment
malfunction during the launch prevented the proper functioning of the
digital audio tape (DAT) recorder during the launch. Since acoustic
data was only gathered with the sound level meter (SLM), not all
metrics were obtained for that launch. The Atlas V launch had an A-
weighted SEL (ASEL) of 96.5 dB (MSRS, 2008c). The Atlas V was predicted
to create a sonic boom of as much as 7.2 pounds per square foot (psf),
impacting the NCI including San Miguel Island (SMI; see Figure 4 in the
USAF application). The size of the actual sonic boom would depend on
meteorological conditions, which can vary by day and season and with
the trajectory of the vehicle. A sonic boom greater than 1 psf was
predicted for the initial Atlas V launch, thus acoustic monitoring was
performed on SMI. Measurements conducted at Cardwell Point indicated a
sonic boom of 1.24 psf with a rise time of 2.4 milliseconds (ms).
Delta II
The Delta II is launched from SLC-2 on north VAFB (see Figure 3 in
the USAF application) approximately 2 km (1.2 mi) from the Spur Road
harbor seal haul-out site and 2.3 km (1.4 mi) from the Purisima Point
haul-out site. The Delta II is a medium-sized launch vehicle
approximately 38 m (124.7 ft) tall. The Delta II uses a Rocketdyne RS-
27A main liquid propellant engine and additional solid rocket strap-on
graphite epoxy motors (GEMs) during liftoff. A total of three, four, or
nine GEMs can be attached for added boost during liftoff. When nine
GEMs are used, six are ignited at liftoff and three are lit once the
rocket is airborne. When three or four GEMs are used they are all
ignited at liftoff. The number of GEMs attached to each vehicle will
determine the amount of sound power produced by the vehicle.
Eight Delta II launches have been acoustically quantified near the
Spur Road harbor seal haul-out site. The Delta II is the second loudest
of the SLVs at the Spur Road haul-out site, the Taurus vehicle being
the loudest (see Table 2 in the application). The Delta II has an
unweighted SEL measurements (based on the six initial acoustically-
measured launches) ranging from 126.5 to 128.8 dB and averaging 127.4
dB, as measured by the DAT recorder. The C-weighted SEL (CSEL) ranged
from 124.3 to 126.7 dB with an average of 125.4 dB (DAT). The ASEL
measurements from both a SLM and the DAT were similar and ranged from
111.8 to 118.2 dB and had an average of 114.5 dB (DAT). The maximum
fast A-weighted sound level (Lmax) values ranged from 104.2 to 112.5 dB
and averaged 109.5 dB.
Sonic booms have been measured on SMI from three Delta II launches:
the EO-1, Iridium MS-12, and AURA (November 2000, February 2002, and
July 2004, respectively). Both the Iridium MS-12 and AURA had two small
sonic booms impact the Point Bennett area of SMI. Iridium MS-12 had
peak overpressures of 0.47 and 0.64 psf and rise times of 18 and 91 ms,
while AURA had peak overpressures of 0.79 and 1.34 psf and rise times
of 9.5 and 10.5 ms. The Delta II EO 1 had a single sonic boom with a
peak overpressure of 0.4 psf and rise time of .041 ms.
Delta IV
The Delta IV is launched from SLC-6, which is 2.8 km (1.7 mi) north
of the main harbor seal haul-out site at South Rocky Point (see Figure
2 in the USAF application). The Delta IV family of launch vehicles
consists of five launch vehicle configurations utilizing a CBC first
stage (liquid fueled) and zero, two, or four strap on solid rocket
GEMs. The Delta IV comes in four medium lift configurations and one
heavy lift configuration consisting of multiple CBCs (Table 4 in the
application). The Delta IV can carry payloads from 4,210 to 13,130 kg
(9,281 to 28,947 lbs) into geosynchronous transfer orbit.
Previously the Athena launch vehicle was launched from SLC-6. The
Athena was a much smaller vehicle than the Delta IV but was one of the
top three loudest vehicles (Table 1 in the application) at the haul-
out, given its close proximity. Because the Delta IV was predicted to
be the loudest vehicle at the south VAFB harbor seal haul-out site, it
was required that acoustic and biological monitoring be conducted for
its first three launches. In addition, harbor seal hearing tests were
required before and after each of the first three launches.
The first two Delta IV launches occurred in 2006. Although the
Delta IV is larger than the Athena, it was found after its initial
launch (NROL-22, June 2006) that the Delta IV had similar noise levels
to the Athena vehicle. As measured by the DAT, the unweighted SEL was
127.7 dB, while the CSEL was
[[Page 77579]]
122.9 dB, and the ASEL was 106.2 dB (Fillmore et al., 2006). The Lmax
was found to be 103.1 dB (Fillmore et al., 2006).
During its second launch (DMSP-17, November 2006), the DAT recorder
was located at the VAFB Boathouse (near where the harbor seal hearing
tests were performed), rather than at the more usual sound monitoring
location of Oil Well Canyon, where an SLM was placed. The DAT measured
the unweighted SEL at 131.3 dB, the CSEL at 127.5 dB, and the ASEL at
111.3 dB. The Lmax was measured at 102.6 dB (Thorson et al., 2007).
The Delta IV was predicted to create maximum sonic booms of as much
as 7.2 psf for the largest of the medium configurations and 8 to 9 psf
for the heavy configuration (Table 4 in the application). The size of
the actual sonic boom would depend on meteorological conditions, which
can vary by day and season, and with the trajectory of the vehicle. A
sonic boom greater than one psf was predicted for the initial Delta IV
launch, thus acoustic monitoring was performed on SMI. An equipment
malfunction resulted in uncertainty regarding the amplitude of the
sonic boom that was recorded for the launch, and the peak overpressure
from the boom could have ranged from 0.77 psf to as much as 3.36 psf.
The rise time was able to be determined and was measured at 8.7 ms.
Because a sonic boom was not predicted for the second Delta IV launch,
monitoring was not performed on SMI.
Capture attempts of harbor seals for the initial Delta IV launch
were unsuccessful; therefore, no hearing tests were performed on seals
for that launch. Capture attempts for the second Delta IV launch were
successful, and hearing tests were performed. There was no evidence
that the launch noise from the Delta IV DMSP 17 caused a loss in harbor
seal hearing acuity. However, given a 2 hr delay in starting the
hearing test due to safety constraints, it is possible that a mild
temporary threshold shift (TTS) could have been fully recovered by the
time the testing was started. Even so, no long-term hearing loss from
the Delta IV launch noise was found (Thorson et al., 2007).
The third Delta IV launch is currently scheduled for December,
2010. Appropriate biological and acoustic monitoring, as well as
hearing testing, are planned for this launch.
Falcon
The Falcon is the launch vehicle for Space Exploration Technologies
(Space X). Space X is a commercial program planning to launch small
payloads into low earth orbit from VAFB. While it has not been
officially decided (30 SW, 2008a), it is anticipated that Space X will
utilize SLC-4E, instead of SLC-3W as originally planned (30 SW, 2008c).
The Space X launch vehicle includes the Falcon I SLV, classified as a
light-lift vehicle. It is a two-stage liquid oxygen and rocket grade
kerosene powered launch vehicle and is 21.3 m (69.9 ft) in length and
1.7 m (5.6 ft) in diameter (Space X, 2007). Beginning in 2009, the
Falcon 1e vehicle will also be available. It is also 1.7 m (5.6 ft) in
diameter, but will have an extended first stage and will be 26.8 m
(87.9 ft) in length (Space X, 2007). The Falcon I has a thrust of
105,500 lbs (in vacuum) and the Falcon 1e has 115,000 lbs (in vacuum)
and are capable of delivering approximately 554 kg (1,221 lbs) into sun
synchronous low earth orbit (Space X, 2007). The first Falcon launch
from VAFB is currently scheduled for August, 2009 (30 SW, 2008a).
Minotaur
The Orbital Suborbital Program launch vehicle, known as Minotaur I,
is launched from SLC-8 on south VAFB (see Figure 2 in the USAF
application), approximately 2.3 km (1.4 mi) from the south VAFB haul-
out sites. The Minotaur I is a four stage, all solid propellant ground
launch vehicle (Orbital Sciences Corporation, 2006a). The launch
vehicle consists of modified Minuteman II Stage I and Stage II
segments, mated with Pegasus upper stages (Orbital Sciences
Corporation, 2006a). The Minotaur is a small vehicle, approximately
19.2 m (63 ft) tall (Orbital Sciences Corporation 2006b), with
approximately 215,000 lbs of thrust.
Two Minotaur launches were acoustically monitored at VAFB (January
2000 and July 2000). The unweighted SEL measurements varied by 3.5 dB
between the two launches and were measured to be 119.4 and 122.9 dB.
The CSELs varied less and were measured at 116.6 and 117.9 dB. From the
DAT and SLM measurements, the ASEL ranged from 104.9 to 107.0 dB. The
launch noise reached an Lmax level of 101.7 and 103.4 dB. No sonic
booms of greater than one psf were predicted to impact the NCI for
these two launches, nor for a third launch for which only biological
monitoring was performed at VAFB given that acoustics had been
previously quantified.
Taurus
The Taurus SLV is launched from 576E on north VAFB, approximately
0.5 km (0.3 mi) from the Spur Road harbor seal haul-out site and 2.3 km
(1.4 mi) from the Purisima Point haul-out site (see Figure 3 in the
USAF application). The standard Taurus is a small launch vehicle, at
approximately 24.7 m (81 ft) tall and is launched in two different
configurations (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and
standard) with different first stages providing 500,000 or 400,000 lbs
of thrust, respectively. The different vehicle configurations have
different thrust characteristics, with the standard configuration
providing less thrust than DARPA.
The launch noise from five Taurus launches has been measured near
the Spur Road haul-out site. The Taurus is the loudest of the launch
vehicles at the Spur Road haul-out site, due to the close proximity of
its launch pad to the haul-out site. The unweighted SEL measurements
from the four initially measured Taurus vehicles ranged from 135.8 to
136.8 and averaged 136.4 dB. The CSEL measurements were slightly lower
as expected, ranging from 133.8 to 134.8 dB and averaged 134.5 dB. The
ASEL measurements ranged from 123.5 to 128.9 dB with an average of
126.6 dB (SLM). The Lmax values were measured to range from 118.3 to
122.9 dB and averaged 120.9 dB (SLM). No sonic booms greater than one
psf were predicted to impact the NCI for any of the six Taurus launches
monitored since 1998.
ICBM and Missile Defense Agency Interceptor and Target Vehicles
There are a variety of small missiles launched from north VAFB,
including the Minuteman III and several types of interceptor and target
vehicles for the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) program. The Peacekeeper
missile program was recently deactivated. Active missile launch
facilities (LFs) are spread throughout northern VAFB (see Figure 3 in
the application), and are within approximately 1 to 3.9 km (0.6 to 2.4
mi) of the Lion's Head haul-out site, and approximately 11 to 16.5 km
(6.8 to 10.3 mi) north of the Spur Road and Purisima Point haul-out
sites. In addition to the LFs, Test Pad (TP)-01 is present on north
VAFB. Although not currently active or associated with a missile
program, MDA may eventually utilize this pad. The trajectories of ICBM
and MDA launches are generally westward and therefore do not cause
sonic boom impacts on the NCI.
ICBM: The Minuteman III missile is an ICBM developed as part of the
U.S. strategic deterrence force. The Minuteman III is launched from an
underground silo. It is composed of three rocket motors, and is 18 m
(59 ft) in length by 1.7 m (5.6 ft) in diameter with a first stage
thrust of 202,600 lbs.
[[Page 77580]]
The launch noise from the June 7, 2002, launch from LF-26 (see
Figure 3 in the USAF application) was measured at the Lion's Head haul-
out site. This LF is approximately 3 km (1.9 mi) away from the haul-out
site. The ASEL measurement of the launch noise was 100.6 dB and the
Lmax value of 98.2 dB.
The launch noise from the May 24, 2000, launch from LF-09 (Figure 3
in the application) was measured at the Spur Road haul-out site. At a
distance of over 15 km from LF-09, the unweighted SEL measurement was
114.7 dB and the CSEL measurement was 111.6 dB. The ASEL measurement
was 26 dB down from the unweighted value and was measured at 88.7 dB.
The Lmax was measured to be 83.3 dB.
MDA Interceptor and Target Vehicles: The MDA continues development
of various systems and elements, including the Ballistic Missile
Defense System (BMDS), the Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) element
of BMDS, the Kinetic Energy Interceptor (KEI) element, and the Air-
Borne Laser (ABL) element.
The BMDS mission is to defend against threat missiles in each phase
or segment of the missile's flight. MDA has been conducting and will
continue to conduct BMDS testing at VAFB through 2014 and beyond.
The GMD element is designed to protect the U.S. in the event of a
limited ballistic missile attack by destroying the threat missile in
the mid-course phase of its flight. During the mid-course phase, which
occurs outside the earth's atmosphere for medium and long-range
missiles, the missile coasts in a ballistic trajectory. The missiles
are comprised of a commercially available, solid propellant booster
consisting of two or three stages, and an exo-atmospheric kill vehicle
or emulator. A two-stage booster is being added to the current three-
stage booster. The Ground Based Interceptor (GBI) was previously
approved for launching from VAFB (68 FR 25347, May 12, 2003). GBI
flight tests are planned from LF-23. As a scheduled risk mitigation,
some limited testing may occur from LF-24 (currently being refurbished
for use).
The second element of BMDS, the KEI element, includes development
of the KEI booster and its flight tests. MDA anticipates a minimum of
three KEI launches per year from 2009 to at least 2012. Candidate
launch sites include 576E, TP-01, and LF-06.
The third element of BMDS, the ABL element, is being developed to
provide an effective defense to limited ballistic missile threats
during the boost segment of an attacking missile's flight. Under the
ABL program, there could be as many as 10 launches per year. Launches
could occur from LF-06a, which would be a new LF, yet to be
constructed, near the current LF-06. Possible launch vehicles could
include Black Brant IX, Hera, Terrier/Orion, two-stage Terrier, Liquid
Fueled Target System (LFTS), Terrier Lynx, Storm, ARIES, Castor I,
Lance, Patriot PAC-2, STRYPI-II, and Hermes.
As a part of BMDS testing, MDA envisions launching a wide variety
of target missiles from VAFB northern LFs on westerly trajectories.
Table 5 in the USAF application identifies missiles being considered by
MDA for use at VAFB. Many of the small missiles under 13 m (42.7 ft),
including the Hera, Lance, Patriot As A Target (PAAT), Black Brant,
Terrier, SRTYPI II, Castor I, Storm, ARIES and Hermes, in addition to
missiles already approved for VAFB (such as Minuteman missiles and the
three-stage GBIs), and the new generation of missiles from the MDA,
such as the KEI and the GBI two-stage, are to be covered under this
application for the five-year programmatic permit because of their
launch site's proximity to the Lion's Head harbor seal pupping site
that was established in 2002.
The LFTS target missile is a single-stage, short range, ballistic
missile with a non-separating payload. The missile is fueled by
kerosene, initiator fuel, and an oxidizer (Inhibited Red Fuming Nitric
Acid). The Flexible Target Family target missiles include the LV 2 and
the LV 3 missiles, which are solid-fueled.
As shown in Table 5 in the application, all of the target and
interceptor missiles are smaller than the Minuteman III or Peacekeeper
missiles previously or currently launched from VAFB. The MDA notes that
the actual heights of the missiles shown in Table 5 will vary depending
on the payload and associated electronic packages (e.g., flight
termination system) or special modifications. Many of the missile types
have interchangeable first or second stage motors; therefore, most may
have similar noise characteristics, depending on their configuration.
Missiles for which acoustic measurements have previously been made, as
well as vehicle size, are included in Table 6 of the application.
The main missile programs and missile types are described herein,
but others may be implemented before this permit expires. The USAF
would notify NMFS of any new missile programs that would be implemented
at VAFB. Completely new types of missiles would be monitored
acoustically and biologically, during their first launch, even if the
launch occurs outside of the pupping season, using the standard launch
monitoring protocol for VAFB. However, configuration changes in
existing missiles would only be monitored during the pupping season, as
is done for all other missile launches.
The MDA's BMDS test plans, including those involving tests from
VAFB, are subject to constant change as the BMDS is being developed
through spiral evolution. Therefore, it is difficult for the MDA to
predict with accuracy its future launch schedule or number of launches
over the next five years. However, due to test resource limitations,
the MDA does not envision conducting more than three missile tests per
quarter (on average) over the next five years from VAFB, and none of
the missiles would be larger than the Minuteman III. This limitation
(i.e., one missile per quarter and none being larger than the Minuteman
III) can be used to establish the potential impacts posed by the MDA
testing at VAFB over the next five years.
In order to compare launch noise from past and current SLVs, as it
was received near the north and south VAFB marine mammal haul-out
sites, Tables 1 through 3 in the USAF application provide information
on the SELs that were measured during previous launch events. Table 1
in the application provides a comparison of SELs as measured at the
sound monitoring site by the south VAFB marine mammal haul-out site.
Table 2 in the application provides the SELs as measured at the sound
monitoring site by the north VAFB Spur Road marine mammal haul-out
site. Finally, Table 3 in the application provides the SELs as measured
at the sound monitoring site by the north VAFB Lion's Head marine
mammal haul-out site.
Aircraft Operations
The VAFB runway, located on north VAFB (see Figure 3 in the
application), supports various aircraft operations further described
below. Aircraft operations include tower operations, such as take offs
and landings (training operations) from the airfield, and range
operations, such as overflights and flight tests. Using data from
fiscal years (FY) 2003, 2006, and 2007 (FY 2004 and 2005 data are not
available), the number of tower operations averaged 12,325 operations
per FY, while range operations averaged 502 operations per FY.
Flight Test Operations: VAFB is a limited site for flight testing
and evaluation of fixed-wing aircraft. Three approved routes are used
that avoid the established pinniped haul-out sites. Aircraft flown
through VAFB airspace and supported by 30 SW include, but
[[Page 77581]]
are not limited to, B1 and B2 bombers, F-15, F-16, and F-22 fighters,
V/X-22, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, and KC-135 tankers.
Fixed-wing Aircraft Operations: Various fixed-wing aircraft (jet
and propeller aircraft) use VAFB for a variety of purposes, including
delivery of space or missile vehicle components, launching of space
vehicles at high altitude (e.g., the Pegasus), and emergency landings.
All aircraft are required to remain outside of the 305-m (1,000-ft)
bubble around pinniped rookeries or haul-out sites, except when
performing a life-or-death rescue mission, when responding to a
security incident, or during an aircraft emergency. There have been no
observed impacts to pinnipeds from fixed-wing aircraft operations
during launch monitoring or pinniped surveys.
Helicopter Operations: The number of helicopter operations at VAFB
decreased in 2008 with the deactivation of the VAFB helicopter
squadron. However other squadrons and units continue to use VAFB for
purposes which include, but are not limited to, transit through,
exercises, and launch mission support. All helicopters are required to
remain outside of the 305-m (1,000-ft) bubble around pinniped rookeries
or haul-out sites. Exceptions may occur when performing a life-or-death
rescue mission, when responding to a security incident, or during an
aircraft emergency. There have been no observed impacts to pinnipeds
from helicopter operations during launch monitoring or pinniped
surveys.
Description of Habitat and Marine Mammals Affected by the Activity
VAFB
VAFB is composed of approximately 99,000 acres of land and
approximately 64.4 km (40 mi) of coastline on the coast of central
California, within Santa Barbara County (see Figure 1 in the USAF
application). The most common marine mammal inhabiting the VAFB
coastline is the Pacific harbor seal (Phoca vitulina richardii). Harbor
seals are local to the area, rarely traveling more than 50 km (31 mi)
from the haul-out site. They haul out on small offshore rocks or reefs
and sandy or cobblestone cove beaches. There are four main harbor seal
haul-out sites on VAFB; three are on north VAFB and one is on south
VAFB.
On north VAFB, harbor seals primarily use the offshore rocky area
near Spur Road; the Purisima Point reef; and the offshore rocky area of
Lion's Head (Figure 3 in the application). The Spur Road and Purisima
Point haul-out sites are in the vicinity of the Delta II launch site,
SLC-2, and the Taurus launch site, referred to as 576E. The Lion's Head
haul-out site is located in the vicinity of the LFs. As many as 110
seals may haul out at Spur Road and as many as 45 seals may haul out at
Purisima Point (SRS Technologies, 2003b). Based on monthly counts
conducted in 2005 through 2007, only one to two pups were observed at
the Spur Road and Purisima Point haul-out sites. As many as 17 seals
may haul out at Lion's Head, with as many as three pups (Thorson et
al., 2004). These three sites are mostly to completely under water at
higher tides (above 1.2 m (3.9 ft)), preventing seals from hauling out
at those times.
The main haul-out area on south VAFB, from the VAFB Harbor north to
South Rocky Point beach, is comprised of many sand and cobblestone
coves and rocky ledges, with most seals found between Harbor Seal Beach
and South Rocky Point (approximately 1.5 km (0.9 mi) of coastline;
Figure 2 in the application). The raised rocky ledge of Flat Iron Rock
provides an area to haul out during most tides (except for very high
tides combined with high swells and wind); therefore, this area is used
more often and by more seals than any other VAFB haul-out site. Weaned
pups, juveniles and some adult females use Weaner Cove, just to the
north of Flat Iron Rock, throughout most of the year. During periods of
high winds, seals may move from Flat Iron Rock into the more protected
Weaner Cove. Peak numbers, as many as 515 seals hauled out at one time
(SRS Technologies, 2003b), usually occur at the south VAFB haul-out
site in the afternoon (1100 to 1600 Pacific Time), but the number of
seals present is also influenced by a combination of high tides and
large swells, high temperature, or strong winds (SRS Technologies,
2003b). During the pupping season (March through June), as many as 49
mother-pup pairs can be found hauled out in the area just north of
Harbor Seal Beach and at Weaner Cove, making these areas the main
pupping sites on VAFB (SRS Technologies, 2003b). During molting (May
through July) adult and some juvenile harbor seals primarily use the
Flat Iron Rock area, while weaned pups, juveniles and a few adult
females use the coves just north and south of Flat Iron Rock (SRS
Technologies, 2002).
NCI
The Northern Channel Islands (NCI) are located approximately 50 km
(31 mi) south of the southern point on VAFB (see Figure 4, inset in the
USAF application). Three islands, San Miguel, Santa Cruz, and Santa
Rosa, make up the main NCI, with San Miguel Island being the primary
site for pinniped rookeries. The NCI are part of the Channel Islands
National Park and the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary.
San Miguel Island
On SMI, commonly found species of pinnipeds include California sea
lions (Zalophus californianus), northern elephant seals (Mirounga
angustirostris), northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) and Pacific
harbor seals. Guadalupe fur seals (Arctocephalus townsendi) and Steller
sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) have bred in the past on SMI, but
sightings have been rare since the mid-1980's. The main rookeries of
sea lions, elephant seals and fur seals are found at Point Bennett on
the west end of SMI (see Figure 4 in the USAF application). California
sea lions occur at Point Bennett, along the south side of the island,
to Cardwell Point, on the east. Northern elephant seals occur at Point
Bennett and from Crook Point to Cardwell Point, with small numbers
along the north coast. Northern fur seals occur in the Point Bennett
area. Harbor seals occur along the north coast and from Crook Point to
Cardwell Point.
There are approximately 23,000 California sea lion pups (30 SW,
2008c), over 10,000 elephant seal pups (Lowry, 2002) and over 4,000 fur
seal pups born on SMI each year (Carretta et al., 2007). Pacific harbor
seals pup on the north and east end of SMI; 2,500 northern elephant
seals and several hundred sea lions also pup on the east end of SMI at
Cardwell Point (Lowry, 2002). Most sea lions and elephant seals on the
south and east end of SMI are non-breeding (juvenile or molting)
animals. This area is composed of high cliffs with small sandy coves
where several hundred seals haul out. From approximately December
through July, pupping and breeding activities overlap between the four
main species (see Table 7 in the application and Table 1 here).
Currently, the main impacts to species on SMI are: environmental
conditions, food limitations (i.e., El Nino or fisheries interactions),
and competition with other pinniped species for breeding space. For all
species, adverse impacts to populations occur periodically because of a
decrease in the availability of food items due to El Nino events.
Commercial fisheries have impacted Steller sea lion and northern fur
seal populations (Sydeman and Allen, 1999). Competition among pinniped
species is occurring as the growing populations of sea lions and
[[Page 77582]]
elephant seals displace less aggressive harbor seals for haul-out
space.
Table 1. Summary of the pupping (birthing and nursing period), breeding, and molting seasons of the four main
pinniped species on SMI.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Species Pupping Season Breeding Season Molting Season
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California sea lion May-July May-August August-December
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northern fur seal May-July May-July August-October
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northern elephant seal December-March December-March April-August
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pacific harbor seal March-May March-June May-July
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Santa Cruz Island
On Santa Cruz Island the main species of marine mammal inhabiting
the island is the harbor seal. California sea lions and northern
elephant seals rarely haul out on Santa Cruz Island, except when sick
or injured. There are approximately 1,050 harbor seals found on Santa
Cruz Island during the spring aerial surveys (Lowry and Carretta,
2003). Based on sonic boom prediction models for previous launches, the
majority of sonic booms produced by launches from VAFB do not impact
Santa Cruz Island.
Santa Rosa Island
On Santa Rosa Island, the main species of marine mammals inhabiting
the island are the harbor seal and the northern elephant seal. In 2001,
1,567 elephant seal pups were born on Santa Rosa (Lowry, 2002). There
are approximately 900 harbor seals found on Santa Rosa Island during
the spring aerial surveys (Lowry and Carretta, 2003). Some California
sea lions pup on Santa Rosa, but it has not been established as a
rookery to date. Pinnipeds generally use the west end of the island,
adjacent to SMI. Based on sonic boom prediction models for previous
launches, the majority of sonic booms produced by launches from VAFB do
not impact Santa Rosa Island.
Comments and Responses
On July 25, 2008, NMFS published a notice of receipt of application
for an LOA in the Federal Register (73 FR 43410) and requested comments
and information from the public for 30 days. NMFS received comments
from the Marine Mammal Commission (Commission) and one private citizen.
The Commission supports NMFS' decision to publish proposed regulations
for the specified activities provided that the research, mitigation,
and monitoring activities described in the application and the current
regulations are incorporated into the rule. NMFS has incorporated the
research, mitigation, and monitoring into the proposed rule. The other
comment opposed the issuance of an authorization without any specific
substantiation for why such an authorization should not be issued. For
the reasons set forth in this preamble, NMFS believes issuance of the
authorization is appropriate.
Marine Mammals Potentially Affected by the Activity
At both VAFB and the NCI, Pacific harbor seals, California sea
lions, and northern elephant seals haul out on beaches throughout the
year. Northern fur seals, Steller sea lions, and Guadalupe fur seals
have not been reported on VAFB. However, northern fur seals and
Guadalupe fur seals can be found on SMI. Northern fur seals are only
found on the west end of SMI at Point Bennett and Castle Rock, just
offshore of SMI. Each year at SMI, zero to two Guadalupe fur seals are
seen generally in the summer (Melin and DeLong, 1999). Steller sea
lions have not been sighted on SMI since 1998. This was a single
observation of a sub-adult male in the spring prior to the breeding
season (Thorson et al., 1999a). Previously, the last observation of a
Steller sea lion was made in the mid-1980's.
The USAF has compiled information on the abundance, status, and
distribution of the species on VAFB and the NCI from surveys that they
have conducted over the last decade and from NMFS Stock Assessment
Reports (SARs). This information may be viewed in the USAF's LOA
application (see ADDRESSES). Additional information is available in the
NMFS SARs, which are available at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/
sars/po2007.pdf.
Potential Effects of Specified Activities on Marine Mammals
The activities under these regulations create two types of noise:
Continuous (but short-duration) noise, due mostly to combustion effects
of aircraft and launch vehicles; and impulsive noise, due to sonic boom
effects. Launch operations are the major source of noise on the marine
environment from VAFB. The operation of launch vehicle engines produces
significant sound levels. Generally, noise is generated from four
sources during launches: (1) Combustion noise from launch vehicle
chambers; (2) jet noise generated by the interaction of the exhaust jet
and the atmosphere; (3) combustion noise from the post-burning of
combustion products; and (4) sonic booms. Launch noise levels are
highly dependent on the type of first-stage booster and the fuel used
to propel the vehicle. Therefore, there is a great similarity in launch
noise production within each class size of launch vehicles.
The noise generated by VAFB activities will result in the
incidental harassment of pinnipeds, both behaviorally and in terms of
physiological (auditory) impacts. The noise and visual disturbances
from SLV and missile launches and aircraft and helicopter operations
may cause the animals to lift their heads, move towards the water, or
enter the water. The following information provides background on
marine mammal responses to launch noise that has been gathered under
previous LOAs for these activities, as well as a scientific research
permit issued to VAFB by NMFS for a research program (Permit No. 859-
1680-01) to determine the short and long-term effects of SLV noise and
sonic booms on affected marine mammals.
Marine Mammal Response to Launch Noise
Seals may leave the haul-out site and enter the water due to the
noise created by launch vehicles during launch operations. The
percentage of seals leaving the haul-out increases with noise level up
to approximately 100 dB ASEL, after which almost all seals leave,
although data have shown that some
[[Page 77583]]
percentage of seals have remained on shore during launches. Time-lapse
video photography during four launch events revealed that the seals
that reacted to the launch noise but did not leave the haul-out were
all adults. Because adult seals reacted less strongly than other
younger seals, this suggests that adults had possibly experienced other
launch disturbances and had habituated to them.
The louder the launch noise, the longer it took for seals to begin
returning to the haul-out site and for the numbers to return to pre-
launch levels. Seals may begin to return to the haul-out site within 2-
55 min of the launch disturbance and the haul-out site usually returned
to pre-launch levels within 45-120 min. In two past Athena IKONOS
launches with ASELs of 107.3 and 107.8 dB at the closest haul-out site,
seals began to haul-out again approximately 16-55 min post-launch
(Thorson et al., 1999a; 1999b). In contrast, noise levels from an Atlas
launch and several Titan II launches had ASELs ranging from 86.7 to
95.7 dB at the closest haul-out and seals began to return to the haul-
out site within 2-8 min post-launch (Thorson and Francine, 1997;
Thorson et al., 2000).
The main concern on the NCI from VAFB launch activities is
potential impacts from sonic booms created during launches of SLVs from
VAFB. During the period of 1997 through 2005, and in 2007 there were no
sonic booms above 2 psf recorded on the NCI. Small sonic booms between
1 and 2 psf usually elicit a heads up response or slow movement toward
and entering the water, particularly for pups. In 2006, due to an
equipment malfunction, there was uncertainty about the peak
overpressure from the Delta IV NROL-22 launch, which could have ranged
between 0.77 and 3.36 psf. During the 1996 Titan IV K-22 launch, sonic
booms of 1 to 9.2 psf reached SMI and caused many sea lions and some
elephant seals to enter the water near the loudest sonic boom (Stewart
et al., 1996). There were no injuries or mortalities as a result of
that sonic boom or the reactions by pinnipeds on SMI.
Haul-out Behavior and Population Dynamics
During the scientific research program, haul-out behavior was
determined by capturing and attaching radio frequency transmitters to
the hind flippers of 41 harbor seals. Twenty-four seals were tagged in
the Rocky Point area of south VAFB, and 17 were tagged at Point
Conception (control site; see Figure 1 in the USAF application). The
tagged seals ranged in age from pups (4 months) through adults. A radio
receiver-scanner and electronic data logger were stationed on the
cliffs above each haul-out site and recorded the presence of any radio
tagged seal every 15 min while the seals are hauled out of the water.
The time of arrival, time of departure, and time on shore, could be
calculated from the data collected by the telemetry system.
The main influence on the daily haul-out patterns of harbor seals
on south VAFB was the time of day (r\2\ = 0.72; n = 423) rather than
tide height (r\2\ = 0.23; n = 423), as the peak number of seals hauled
out occurred daily between 1100 and 1700 hours. Haul-out behavior was
also influenced by combinations of high tide and large swell or high
temperature and no wind. Either of these combinations may cause seals
not to haul out at all or to leave the haul-out site early. Seals
remained on shore for 8.1 hr plus or minus 1.6 hr (range 1.2 - 14.7
hr). There was no significant difference in the time of day or duration
of hauling out between south VAFB and Point Conception (t-test, P>.05).
Site fidelity, which is defined herein as an individual's continued
use of the same haul-out area for at least 6 months, was high at both
south VAFB and Point Conception. The mean site fidelity at VAFB was 77
percent (adults 84 percent, juveniles 72 percent, and pups 63 percent),
and at Point Conception was 71 percent (adults 81 percent, juveniles 74
percent, and pups 53 percent). The trend of increasing site fidelity
with age is common in all harbor seal populations, as young seals
cannot compete for haul-out space with adults, and move to other less
preferred haul-out sites (Kovacs et al., 1990; Suryan and Harvey,
1998). There have been four juveniles tagged at Point Conception that
have moved to VAFB, but no juveniles have moved from VAFB to Point
Conception.
The total population of harbor seals at VAFB in 2002 was estimated
to be 1,115 (850 on south VAFB and 265 on north VAFB; SRS Technologies,
2003a), using telemetry data to correct for seals that were at sea
during the census. A correction factor of 1.7 times the ground count
was used. From 2000 through 2007 there were three to seven SLV launches
per year (average of 4.4 SLV launches annually), and there appeared to
be only short-term disturbance effects to harbor seals as a result of
launch noise. The harbor seal population increased from 1997 to 2002 at
an annual rate of 12.7 percent; however, the number of total harbor
seals on south VAFB was lower in 2007 (356 seals) than 2006 (511
seals). The only decrease in the population during the 1997 to 2002
period occurred during the 1998 El Nino season, when there was a 13.6
percent decrease from the previous year. The number of harbor seal pups
observed increased at a rate of 26.7 percent annually through 2003,
except during the El Nino events. The number of pups on south VAFB
continued to increase from 2004 through 2006 (high of 53 pups) but fell
again in 2007 (38 pups). Pup production grew at a rate of 7.9 percent
at Point Conception through 2006, except during El Nino events. Point
Conception has limited area where females and pups can haul out without
being harassed by other seals or exposed to high tides and swells.
There are more haul-out areas for females with pups at VAFB; therefore
only an El Nino type disturbance, which includes weather and food
availability effects, should affect pup production at VAFB.
Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) Tests
To determine if harbor seals experience changes in their hearing
sensitivity as a result of launch noise, ABR testing was conducted on
18 harbor seals for four Titan IV launches, one Taurus launch, and one
Delta IV launch.
Following standard ABR testing protocol, the ABR was measured from
one ear of each seal using sterile, sub-dermal, stainless steel
electrodes. A conventional electrode array was used, and low-level
white noise was presented to the non-tested ear to reduce any
electrical potentials generated by the non-tested ear. A Bio-logic
Systems Corporation evoked potential computer was used to produce the
click and an 8 kilohertz (kHz) tone burst stimuli, through standard
audiometric headphones. Over 1,000 ABR waveforms were collected and
averaged per trial. Initially the stimuli were presented at sound
pressure levels (SPL) loud enough to obtain a clean reliable waveform,
and then decreased in 10 dB steps until the response was no longer
reliably observed. Once response was no longer reliably observed, the
stimuli were then increased in 10 dB steps to the original SPL. By
obtaining two ABR waveforms at each SPL, it was possible to quantify
the variability in the measurements.
Good replicable responses were measured from most of the seals,
with waveforms following the expected pattern of an increase in latency
and decrease in amplitude of the peaks, as the stimulus level was
lowered. One seal had substantial decreased acuity to the 8 kHz tone-
burst stimuli prior to the launch. The cause of this hearing loss was
unknown but was most likely
[[Page 77584]]
congenital or from infection. Another seal had a great deal of
variability in waveform latencies in response to identical stimuli.
This animal moved repeatedly during testing, which may have reduced the
sensitivity of the ABR testing on this animal for both the click and 8
kHz tone burst stimuli. Two of the seals were released after pre-launch
testing but prior to the launch of the Titan IV B-34, as the launch was
delayed for many days, and five days is the maximum duration permitted
to hold the seals for testing.
Detailed analysis of the changes in waveform latency and waveform
replication of the ABR measurements for the 14 seals, showed no
detectable changes in the seals' hearing sensitivity as a result of
exposure to the launch noise. The delayed start (1.75 to 3.5 hr after
the launches) for ABR testing allows for the possibility that the seals
may have recovered from a TTS before testing began. However, it can be
said with confidence that the post-launch tested animals did not have
permanent hearing changes due to exposure to the launch noise from the
Titan IV, Taurus, or Delta IV SLVs. These results are consistent with
previous NMFS conclusions for such activities in its prior rulemakings
(63 FR 39055, July 21, 1998; 69 FR 5720, February 6, 2004).
NMFS also notes that stress from long-term cumulative sound
exposures can result in physiological effects on reproduction,
metabolism, and general health, or on the animals' resistance to
disease. However, this is not likely to occur as a result of the
activities from VAFB, because of the infrequent nature and short
duration of the noise, including the occasional sonic boom. Research
indicates that population levels at these haul-out sites have remained
constant in recent years, giving support to this conclusion.
The USAF does not anticipate a significant impact on any of the
species or stocks of marine mammals from launches from VAFB. For even
the largest launch vehicles, such as Delta IV, the launch noises and
sonic booms can be expected to cause a startle response and flight to
water for those harbor seals, California sea lions and other pinnipeds
that are hauled out on the coastline of VAFB and on the NCI. The noise
may cause TTS in hearing depending on exposure levels, but no PTS is
anticipated.
Numbers of Marine Mammals Estimated to be Taken by Harassment
The marine mammal species NMFS believes likely to be taken by Level
B harassment incidental to launch and aircraft and helicopter
operations at VAFB are harbor seals, California sea lions, northern
elephant seals, and northern fur seals. All of these species are
protected under the MMPA, and none are listed under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA). Numbers of animals that may be taken by Level B
harassment are expected to vary due to factors such as type of SLV,
location of the sonic boom, weather conditions (which can influence the
size of the sonic boom), the time of day, and the time of year. For
this reason, ranges are given for the harassment estimates of marine
mammals. Aircraft operations will occur frequently but will avoid
pinniped haul-out areas and are unlikely to disturb pinnipeds.
As noted earlier, sightings of Steller sea lions and Guadalupe fur
seals have been extremely rare the last few decades or low at VAFB and
on the NCI. Therefore, no takes by harassment are anticipated for
either of these species incidental to the proposed activities.
Estimated Takes at VAFB
Harbor seals: As many as 600 harbor seals per launch may be taken.
Depending on the type of rocket being launched, the time of day, time
of the year, weather conditions, tide and swell conditions, the number
of seals that may be taken will range between 0 and 600. Launches and
aircraft operations may occur at any time of the year so any age
classes and gender may be taken.
California sea lions: As many as 200 sea lions per launch may be
taken. Sea lions at VAFB are usually juveniles of both sexes and sub-
adult males that haul out in the fall during the post breeding
dispersal. Births generally do not occur at VAFB, but five pups were
observed at VAFB in 2003, an El Nino year, although all were abandoned
by their mothers and died within several days of birth. Sick or
emaciated weaned pups may also haul out briefly. The number of sea
lions that may be taken will range between 0 and 200.
Northern elephant seals: As many as 200 elephant seals per launch
may be taken. Weaned elephant seal pups, juveniles, or young adults of
both sexes, may occasionally haul out at VAFB for several days to rest
or as long as 30 days to molt. Injured or sick seals may also haul out
briefly. The number of northern elephant seals that may be taken will
range between 0 and 200.
Northern fur seals: There are no reports of northern fur seals at
VAFB. Therefore, it is unlikely that any fur seals will be taken.
Estimated Takes on the NCI
Sonic booms created by SLVs may impact marine mammals on the NCI,
particularly SMI. Missile launches utilize westward trajectories so do
not cause sonic boom impacts to the NCI. The PCBoom sonic boom modeling
program will continue to be used to predict the area of sonic boom
impact and magnitude of the sonic boom on the NCI based on the launch
vehicle, speed, trajectory, and meteorological conditions. Prior to
each SLV launch, a predictive sonic boom map of the impact area and
magnitude of the sonic boom will be generated. Based on previous
monitoring of sonic booms created by SLVs on SMI (Thorson et al.,
1999a: 1999b), it is estimated that as much as approximately 25 percent
of the marine mammals may be disturbed on SMI (Thorson et al., 1999a;
1999b). Most sonic booms that reach SMI are small (<1 psf), although
larger sonic booms are possible, but rarely occur. A conservative take
estimate of as much as 25 percent of the animals present is used for
each species per launch.
Harbor seals: As many as 200 harbor seals of all age classes and
sexes may be taken per launch on the NCI. The number of harbor seals
that may be taken will range between 0 and 200.
California sea lions: As many as 5,800 sea lion pups and 2,500
juvenile and adult sea lions of either sex may be taken on the NCI per
launch. The number of sea lions that may be taken will range between 0
and 8,300.
Northern elephant seals: As many as 3,000 northern elephant seal
pups and 10,000 northern elephant seals of all age classes and sexes
may be taken per launch on the NCI. The number of elephant seals that
may be taken will range between 0 and 13,000.
Northern fur seals: As many as 300 northern fur seal pups and 1,100
juvenile and adult northern fur seals of both sexes may be taken per
launch at SMI. The number of fur seals that may be taken will range
between 0 and 1,400.
With the incorporation of mitigation measures proposed later in
this document, the USAF and NMFS expect that only Level B incidental
harassment may occur as a result of the proposed activities and that
these events will result in no detectable impact on marine mammal
species or stocks or on their habitats.
Potential Effects of Specified Activities on Marine Mammal Habitat
Impacts on marine mammal habitat are part of the consideration in
making a finding of negligible impact on the species and stocks of
marine mammals. Habitat includes, but is not necessarily limited to,
rookeries, mating grounds, feeding areas, and areas of similar
[[Page 77585]]
significance. Only short-term disturbance of marine mammals is expected
as a result of the proposed activities. No impacts to marine mammal
habitats are anticipated on VAFB or the NCI.
Potential Effects of Specified Activities on Subsistence Needs
NMFS has preliminarily determined that the issuance of an LOA for
USAF space vehicle and missile launches and aircraft and helicopter
operations at VAFB would not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the affected species or stocks for subsistence use
since there are no such uses for these pinniped species in California.
Mitigation
To minimize impacts on pinnipeds on beach haul-out sites and to
avoid any possible sensitizing or predisposing of pinnipeds to greater
responsiveness towards the sights and sounds of a launch, the USAF has
prepared the following mitigation measures.
All aircraft and helicopter flight paths must maintain a minimum
distance of 1,000 ft (305 m) from recognized seal haul-outs and
rookeries (e.g., Point Sal, Purisima Point, Rocky Point), except in
emergencies or for real-time security incidents (e.g., search-and-
rescue, fire-fighting) which may require approaching pinniped haul-outs
and rookeries closer than 1,000 ft (305 m). For missile and rocket
launches, unless constrained by other factors including, but not
limited to, human safety, national security concerns or launch
trajectories, holders of LOAs must schedule launches to avoid, whenever
possible, launches during the harbor seal pupping season of March
through June. NMFS also proposes to expand the requirement so that the
USAF must avoid, whenever possible, launches which are predicted to
produce a sonic boom on the NCI during harbor seal, elephant seal,
California sea lion, and northern fur seal pupping seasons.
If post-launch surveys determine that an injurious or lethal take
of a marine mammal has occurred, the launch procedure and the
monitoring methods must be reviewed, in cooperation with NMFS, and
appropriate changes must be made through modification to an LOA, prior
to conducting the next launch of the same vehicle under that LOA.
Monitoring
As part of its application, the USAF provided a monitoring plan,
similar to that in the current regulations (50 CFR 216.125), for
assessing impacts to marine mammals from rocket and missile launches at
VAFB. This monitoring plan is described, in detail, in their
application (30 SW, 2008c). The USAF will conduct the following
monitoring under the regulations.
The monitoring will be conducted by a NMFS-approved marine mammal
biologist experienced in surveying large numbers of marine mammals.
Monitoring at the haul-out site closest to the launch facility will
commence at least 72 hours prior to the launch and continue until at
least 48 hours after the launch.
Monitoring for VAFB
Biological monitoring at VAFB will be conducted for all launches
during the harbor seal pupping season, 1 March to 30 June. Acoustic and
biological monitoring will be conducted on new space and missile launch
vehicles during at least the first launch, whether it occurs within the
pupping season or not. Also, the third Delta IV launch will be
monitored, and ABR testing of seals in close proximity to the launch is
planned. The testing will be authorized under a scientific research
permit issued under Section 104 of the MMPA. Such work is currently
conducted under Permit No. 859-1680-01, which expires on January 1,
2009. The USAF has submitted an application to NMFS for issuance of a
new scientific research permit to continue the ABR tests, as well as
other research projects. The ABR tests would be required once NMFS
issues the Section 104 research permit. NMFS estimates that the tests
would be required for years 2-5 of these proposed regulations.
Monitoring will include multiple surveys each day that record, when
possible, the species, number of animals, general behavior, presence of
pups, age class, gender, and reaction to launch noise, sonic booms, or
other natural or human-caused disturbances. Environmental conditions
such as tide, wind speed, air temperature, and swell will also be
recorded. Time-lapse photography or video will be used during daylight
launches to document the behavior of mother-pup pairs during launch
activities. For launches during the harbor seal pupping season (March
through June), follow-up surveys will be made within 2 weeks of the
launch to ensure that there were no adverse effects on any marine
mammals. A report detailing the species, number of animals observed,
behavior, reaction to the launch noise, time to return to the haul-out
site, any adverse behavior and environmental conditions will be
submitted to NMFS within 90 days of the launch.
Monitoring for the NCI
Monitoring will be conducted on the NCI (San Miguel, Santa Cruz,
and Santa Rosa Islands) whenever a sonic boom over 1 psf is predicted
(using the most current sonic boom modeling programs) to impact one of
the Islands. Monitoring will be conducted at the haul-out site closest
to the predicted sonic boom impact area. Monitoring will be conducted
by a NMFS-approved marine mammal biologist experienced in surveying
large numbers of marine mammals. Monitoring will commence at least 72
hours prior to the launch and continue until at least 48 hours after
the launch.
Monitoring will include multiple surveys each day that record the
species, number of animals, general behavior, presence of pups, age
class, gender, and reaction to launch noise, sonic booms, or other
natural or hu