Asbestos-Containing Materials in Schools; State Request for Waiver From Requirements, 77683-77686 [E8-30201]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Notices
19103 at (215) 814–3335 or by e-mail at:
kotsch.martin@EPA.gov. The finding is
available at EPA’s conformity Web site:
https://www.epa.gov/otaq/
stateresources/transconf/currsips.htm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’,
or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. The word
‘‘budgets’’ refers to the motor vehicle
emission budgets for volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides
(NOX ). The word ‘‘SIP’’ in this
document refers to the RFP Plans for the
Pennsylvania portion of the
Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City
Ozone Nonattainment Area submitted to
EPA as SIP revisions on August 29,
2007.
Today’s notice is simply an
announcement of a finding that EPA has
already made. EPA Region III sent a
letter to PADEP on November 20, 2008
stating that the MVEBs in the RFP Plan
are adequate for transportation
conformity purposes. As a result of
EPA’s finding, the State of Pennsylvania
must use the MVEBs from the August
29, 2007 RFP Plan for future conformity
determinations for the 8-hour ozone
standard. This finding has also been
announced on EPA’s conformity Web
site: https://www.epa.gov/otaq/
stateresources/transconf/pastsips.htm.
The adequate MVEBs are provided in
the following table:
the SIP. Even if we find a budget
adequate, the SIP could later be
disapproved. We have described our
process for determining the adequacy of
submitted SIP budgets in 40 CFR
93.118(f), and have followed this rule in
making our adequacy determination.
Dated: December 5, 2008.
William T. Wisniewski,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. E8–30206 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2008–0790; FRL–8754–4]
Asbestos-Containing Materials in
Schools; State Request for Waiver
From Requirements
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed approval
and request for comments.
SUMMARY: This action provides notice
and an opportunity for public hearing,
and solicits written comments on EPA’s
proposed waiver of the requirements of
the Federal asbestos-in-schools program
for the State of New Hampshire. A
waiver request will be granted if EPA
determines that the State of New
Hampshire is implementing or intends
to implement a state program of asbestos
TABLE 1—PENNSYLVANIA MOTOR
inspection and management that is at
VEHICLE EMISSIONS BUDGETS
least as stringent as the federal program.
This action provides notice and an
2008 Reasonable Further
Progress
opportunity for a public hearing, and
Nonattainment
solicits written comments on the waiver
area
VOC
NOX
request submitted by the State of New
(tpd)
(tpd)
Hampshire.
Philadelphia ......
61.09
108.78 DATES: Written comments under Docket
ID Number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2008–0790
Transportation conformity is required must be received by February 17, 2009.
by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act,
Each comment must include the name
as amended in 1990. EPA’s conformity
and address of the submitter. Any
rule requires that transportation plans,
request for a public hearing must be in
programs and projects conform to state
writing, and be received on or before
air quality implementation plans and
February 17, 2009, and detail specific
establishes the criteria and procedure
objections to the grant of the waiver. If,
for determining whether or not they do. during the comment period, EPA
Conformity to a SIP means that
receives such a request for a public
transportation activities will not
hearing, EPA will schedule a public
produce new air quality violations,
hearing in New Hampshire following
worsen existing violations, or delay
the comment period. EPA will
timely attainment of the national
announce the date of the public hearing
ambient air quality standards. The
in the Federal Register.
criteria by which we determine whether ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
a SIP’s motor vehicle emission budgets
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
are adequate for conformity purposes
HQ–OPPT–2008–0790, by one of the
are outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4).
following methods:
Please note that an adequacy review is
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
separate from EPA’s completeness
the on-line instructions for submitting
review, and it also should not be used
comments.
to prejudge EPA’s ultimate approval of
2. E-mail: bryson.jamesm@epa.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
22:25 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77683
3. Fax: (617) 918–0563.
4. Mail: Docket ID Number EPA–HQ–
OPPT–2008–0790, Asbestos
Coordinator, Region 1—New England,
Environmental Protection Agency, One
Congress Street, Suite 1100 Mailcode
SEP, Boston, MA 02114–2023.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: James M.
Bryson, Asbestos Coordinator, Region
1—New England, Environmental
Protection Agency, One Congress Street,
Suite 1100 Mailcode SEP, Boston, MA
02114–2023. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office’s
normal hours of operation. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 5,
excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID Number EPA–HQ–OPPT–
2008–0790. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov including
any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
through https://www.regulations.gov or
e-mail, information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected.
The https://www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an e-mail
comment directly to EPA without going
through https://www.regulations.gov
your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
77684
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Notices
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
with the Asbestos Coordinator, Region
1—New England, Environmental
Protection Agency, One Congress Street,
Suite 1100 Mailcode SEP, Boston, MA
02114–2023. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 to 5 excluding
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information contact: Colby
Lintner, Regulatory Coordinator,
Environmental Assistance Division
(7408M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (202) 564–8182; e-mail address:
TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.
For technical information contact:
James M. Bryson, Asbestos Coordinator,
Region 1—New England, Environmental
Protection Agency, One Congress Street,
Suite 1100 Mailcode SEP, Boston, MA
02114–2023; telephone number: (617)
918–1524; e-mail address:
bryson.jamesm@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. What Action Is the Agency (EPA)
Taking?
EPA is considering granting a waiver
of the asbestos-in-schools program to
the State of New Hampshire. This notice
is issued, and the waiver, if granted,
would be issued under Section 203(m)
of the Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA) and 40 CFR 763.98. Section 203
is within Title II of TSCA, the Asbestos
Hazard Emergency Response Act
(AHERA).
The Agency recognizes that a waiver
granted to any State would not
encompass schools operated under the
defense dependents’ education system
(the third type of local education agency
(LEA) defined at TSCA section 202(7)
and 40 CFR 763.83, which serve
dependents in overseas areas, and other
elementary and secondary schools
outside a State’s jurisdiction, which
generally includes schools in Indian
country. Such schools would remain
subject to EPA’s asbestos-in-schools
program.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
B. What Is the Agency’s Authority for
Taking This Action?
In 1987, under TSCA section 203, at
15 U.S.C. 2643, the Agency promulgated
regulations that require the
identification and management of
asbestos-containing material by LEAs in
the nation’s elementary and secondary
school buildings: the ‘‘AHERA Schools
Rule’’ (40 CFR part 763, subpart E).
Under section 203(m) of TSCA and 40
CFR 763.98, upon request by a State
Governor and after notice and comment
and opportunity for a public hearing in
the State, EPA may waive, in whole or
in part, the requirements of the asbestosin-schools program (TSCA section 203
and the AHERA Schools Rule) if EPA
determines that the State has
established and is implementing or
intends to implement a program of
asbestos inspection and management
that contains requirements that are at
least as stringent as those in the
Agency’s asbestos-in-schools program.
A State seeking a waiver must submit its
request to the EPA Region in which that
State is located.
C. When Did New Hampshire Submit Its
Request for a Waiver and How Is EPA
Proposing To Respond?
On July 15, 2008, Governor John H.
Lynch submitted to the EPA Region 1
Regional Administrator, a letter with
supporting documentation requesting a
full waiver of the requirements of EPA’s
asbestos-in-schools program pursuant to
the AHERA statute and 40 CFR 763.98.
The EPA Region 1 Administrator
indicated to New Hampshire, by letter
dated July 31, 2008, that the request was
received. On September 30, 2008, the
Manager of EPA’s Toxics and Pesticides
Unit submitted comments to the New
Hampshire Department of
Environmental Service’s Air Resources
Division regarding the AHERA waiver
request. The State provided EPA with a
response, dated October 10, 2008, in
which each of EPA’s comments was
addressed.
EPA is hereby issuing this notice in
the Federal Register announcing receipt
of the complete New Hampshire waiver
request and an opportunity for public
comment and a hearing (if necessary)
and, also, making the request and
supporting documentation available in
the public record for this notice. The
Agency is also describing the
information submitted by New
Hampshire and EPA’s preliminary
determination as to how the waiver
request meets the criteria for granting a
waiver.
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
D. What Was EPA’s Determination With
Regard to the Completeness of New
Hampshire’s Waiver Request?
The New Hampshire waiver request
was deemed complete 30 days after
receipt by EPA with regard to the
required contents of a waiver request, as
specified at 40 CFR 763.98. In
particular, the State’s waiver request
contains the following information
from, and representations by, New
Hampshire:
1. A copy of the New Hampshire
regulatory provisions relating to its
program. These consist of the following,
as well as other supporting
documentation: (a) A copy of the
proposed New Hampshire regulatory
provisions related to its program of
asbestos inspection and management in
Schools RSA 141–E:4, I and II, Chapter
Env-A 1800 Asbestos Management And
Control Regulations, (b) A comparison
of the New Hampshire School Program
RSA 141–E:4, I and II, Chapter Env-A
1800 Asbestos Management And
Control Regulations, to the EPA program
at 40 CFR part 763, Subpart E, (c) an
assurance of Legal Authority from New
Hampshire Attorney General, and (d) a
reference to the New Hampshire
Compliance Assurance Response Policy
(CARP) at https://des.nh.gov/
organization/commissioner/legal/carp/
index.htm which describes New
Hampshire’s approach to enforcement,
relevant legal authorities, and penalty
calculations. New Hampshire intends to
use as guidance EPA’s January 31, 1989
AHERA Enforcement Response Policy
(ERP) to calculate penalties based on
determinations of the circumstance
level and extent of severity applicable to
specific violations.
2. The agency that is responsible for
administrating and enforcing the
requirements for which a waiver is
requested is the New Hampshire
Department of Environmental Services
(DES), Division of Air Resources,
Compliance Bureau. The officials within
the Compliance Bureau who are
responsible for New Hampshire’s
asbestos-in-schools program are: Pamela
G. Monroe, Compliance Bureau
Administrator; Barbara L. Hoffman,
Compliance and Enforcement Programs
Manager; Stephen G. Cullinane,
Asbestos Program Manager; Marjorie
Yin, AHERA Specialist; and Elizabeth
Nixon, Enforcement Section Supervisor.
3. Detailed reasons, supporting
papers, and rationale for concluding
that New Hampshire’s asbestos
inspection and management programs,
for which the waiver request is made,
are at least as stringent as the
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Notices
requirements of the AHERA Schools
Rule (40 CFR part 763, subpart E).
4. New Hampshire neither highlighted
nor discussed any special situations,
problems, and needs pertaining to the
State’s waiver request. Accordingly, no
explanation of how the State would
handle the issues was provided.
5. A statement of the resources that
New Hampshire intends to devote to the
administration and enforcement of the
provisions relating to the waiver
request.
6. Copies of any specific or enabling
New Hampshire laws and regulations
relating to the request, including
provisions for assessing criminal and/or
civil penalties.
7. Assurance from the Governor, that
DES has the legal authority necessary to
carry out the requirements relating to
the waiver request, as indicated in the
July 15, 2008, letter from Governor
Lynch of New Hampshire to the EPA
Region TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov 1
Regional Administrator.
E. What Are the Criteria for EPA’s Grant
of the Waiver?
EPA may waive some or all of the
requirements of the Agency’s asbestosin-schools program if the Agency
determines that New Hampshire has
met the criteria set forth at 40 CFR
763.98. The specific criteria and EPA’s
preliminary determination for each
relative to the grant of the waiver to
New Hampshire are set forth below:
1. The State’s lead agency has the
legal authority necessary to carry out the
provisions of asbestos inspection and
management in schools relating to the
waiver request.
Preliminary Determination—EPA has
determined preliminarily that the
statutory and regulatory provisions cited
at Section I.D.1 of this notice gives DES’
Division of Air Resources the legal
authority necessary to carry out the
provisions of asbestos inspection and
management in schools relating to the
waiver request.
2. The State’s program of asbestos
inspection and management in schools
and its implementation of the program
are or will be at least as stringent as the
requirements of the AHERA Schools
Rule.
Preliminary Determination—EPA has
determined preliminarily that New
Hampshire’s program is at least as
stringent as EPA’s program. On October
10, 2008, New Hampshire addressed the
EPA recommended revisions as
provided in EPA’s September 30, 2008
correspondence. On October 16, 2008
New Hampshire’s Joint Legislative
Committee on Administrative Rules
approved the New Hampshire RSA 141–
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
E:4, I and II, Chapter Env-A 1800
Asbestos Management and Control
Regulations.
3. The State has an enforcement
mechanism to allow it to implement the
program described in the waiver
request.
Preliminary Determination—EPA has
determined preliminarily that the
compliance and enforcement provisions
of New Hampshire’s asbestos-in-schools
program are adequate to run the
program. DES is authorized by RSA
141–E to implement a program of
asbestos licensing, inspection and
management. DES has the authority to
enter any public building, facility,
school, or rental dwelling to ‘‘cause
inspections to be carried out’’ if the
agency has reason to suspect the
presence of regulated asbestoscontaining material RSA 141–E:8. DES
has authority to enter any asbestos
abatement worksite, obtain samples for
air testing and monitoring, procure and
examine licenses issued under RSA
141–E:10 and certificates issued under
RSA 141–E:11, and to request, inspect,
and record information or test results
relating to school asbestos abatement
planning activities. RSA 141–E:13.
DES has the authority to enforce the
state’s asbestos laws and rules through
orders and notices of abatement. RSA
141–E:14. DES has the authority to
impose administrative fines up to
$2,000 per violation. RSA 141–E:16.
Through the NH Attorney General, DES
can seek civil penalties up to $25,000
per day as well as injunctive relief for
violations of RSA 141–E and any rule
adopted thereunder. RSA 141–E:17. Any
person who knowingly and willfully
violates any provisions of RSA 141–E or
any rule adopted thereunder, or who
violates any term or condition of a
license, certification or order issued
under RSA 141–E, or who makes or
certifies a material false statement
relative to any document or information
required under RSA 141–E is guilty of
a class B felony and can be fined
$25,000 per day per violation. RSA 141–
E:15. To help ensure compliance with
its asbestos regulations, DES will revise
their Neutral Administrative Inspection
Scheme (NAIS) for targeting compliance
inspections. By focusing on activities
where problems are most likely to
occur, the NAIS is designed to
maximize the effectiveness of DES’
inspection/enforcement efforts toward
preventing and controlling asbestosrelated risks to human health and the
environment.
4. The State has or will have qualified
personnel to carry out the provisions
relating to the waiver request.
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77685
Preliminary Determination—EPA has
determined preliminarily that New
Hampshire has qualified personnel to
carry out the provisions of the waiver.
The existing program staff includes 2
employees trained to enforce the
requirements of 40 CFR part 763,
subpart E. The program will be carried
out by staff in the DES’ Division of Air
Resources, Compliance Bureau. New
Hampshire commits approximately 2
persons each year to AHERA
compliance monitoring and
enforcement activities under the EPA
TSCA Asbestos Enforcement Grant. Staff
is fully trained and certified as
Contractor/Supervisor, Inspector, and
Management Planner.
5. The State will devote adequate
resources to the administration and
enforcement of the asbestos inspection
and management provisions relating to
the waiver request.
Preliminary Determination—EPA has
determined preliminarily that the
resources developed by DES’ Division of
Air Resources are adequate to effectively
administer and enforce the provisions of
the asbestos program in New
Hampshire. In particular, New
Hampshire is currently expected to
receive funding through an EPA grant in
the amount of $100,000 annually which,
when combined with State matching
funds of approximately $33,000, results
in a total funding level of $133,000 for
this FY 2009.
6. The State has responded to EPA
and addressed all of the Agency’s
concerns in numbers 2 through 4 above.
Preliminary Determination—EPA will
grant a full waiver as long as New
Hampshire continues its asbestos-inschools implementation and
enforcement strategy utilizing adequate
resources. EPA may evaluate
periodically the adequacy of New
Hampshire’s program under 40 CFR
763.98, and under circumstances set
forth in the regulation.
F. What Recordkeeping and Reporting
Burden Approvals Apply to the New
Hampshire Waiver Request?
The recordkeeping and reporting
burden associated with waiver requests
was approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
OMB control number XXXX–XXX. This
document simply announces the
Agency’s receipt of the New Hampshire
waiver request and therefore it imposes
no additional burden beyond that
covered under existing OMB control
number XXXX–XXXX.
II. Materials in the Official Record
The official record, under Docket ID
Number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2008–0790,
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
77686
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Notices
contains the New Hampshire waiver
request and other supporting, relevant
documents underlying the State’s
request and EPA’s proposed approval in
response to the request.
Dated: November 30, 2008.
Robert W. Varney,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. E8–30201 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8754–8; Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–ORD–
2007–0517]
Draft Integrated Science Assessment
for Particulate Matter
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice of Public Comment
Period.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing
the availability of its ‘‘First External
Review Draft Integrated Science
Assessment for Particulate Matter’’
(EPA/600/R–08/139 and EPA/600/R–08/
139A). The document was prepared by
the National Center for Environmental
Assessment (NCEA) within EPA(s Office
of Research and Development as part of
the review of the national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS) for
particulate matter.
EPA is releasing this draft document
to seek review by the Clean Air
Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC)
and the public (meeting date and
location to be specified in a separate
Federal Register notice). The draft
document does not represent, and
should not be construed to represent,
any final EPA policy, viewpoint, or
determination. EPA will consider any
public comments submitted in response
to this notice when revising the
document.
DATES: The public comment period
begins on or about December 19, 2008.
Comments must be received on or
before March 13, 2009.
ADDRESSES: The ‘‘First External Review
Draft Integrated Science Assessment for
Particulate Matter’’ will be available
primarily via the Internet on the
National Center for Environmental
Assessment’s home page under the
Recent Additions and Publications
menus at https://www.epa.gov/ncea. A
limited number of CD–ROM or paper
copies will be available. Contact Ms.
Debbie Wales by phone (919–541–4731),
fax (919–541–5078), or e-mail
(wales.deborah@epa.gov) to request
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
either of these, and please provide your
name, your mailing address, and the
document title, ‘‘First External Review
Draft Integrated Science Assessment for
Particulate Matter’’ (EPA/600/R–08/139
and EPA/600/R–08/139A) to facilitate
processing of your request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical information, contact Dr.
Lindsay Wichers Stanek, NCEA;
telephone: 919–541–7792; facsimile:
919–541–2985; or e-mail:
stanek.lindsay@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Information About the Document
Section 108(a) of the Clean Air Act
directs the Administrator to identify
certain pollutants which, among other
things, ‘‘cause or contribute to air
pollution which may reasonably be
anticipated to endanger public health or
welfare’’ and to issue air quality criteria
for them. These air quality criteria are
to ‘‘accurately reflect the latest scientific
knowledge useful in indicating the kind
and extent of all identifiable effects on
public health or welfare which may be
expected from the presence of [a]
pollutant in the ambient air * * *’’
Under section 109 of the Act, EPA is
then to establish national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS) for each
pollutant for which EPA has issued
criteria. Section 109 (d) of the Act
subsequently requires periodic review
and, if appropriate, revision of existing
air quality criteria to reflect advances in
scientific knowledge on the effects of
the pollutant on public health or
welfare. EPA is also to revise the
NAAQS, if appropriate, based on the
revised air quality criteria.
Particulate matter (PM) is one of six
principal (or ‘‘criteria’’) pollutants for
which EPA has established NAAQS.
Periodically, EPA reviews the scientific
basis for these standards by preparing
an Integrated Science Assessment (ISA)
(formerly called an Air Quality Criteria
Document). The ISA and supplementary
annexes, in conjunction with additional
technical and policy assessments,
provide the scientific basis for EPA
decisions on the adequacy of the current
NAAQS and the appropriateness of
possible alternative standards. The
Clean Air Scientific Advisory
Committee (CASAC), an independent
science advisory committee whose
existence and whose review and
advisory functions are mandated by
Section 109 (d) (2) of the Clean Air Act,
is charged (among other things) with
independent scientific review of EPA’s
air quality criteria.
On June 28, 2007 (72 FR 35462), EPA
formally initiated its current review of
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the air quality criteria for PM,
requesting the submission of recent
scientific information on specified
topics. A draft of EPA’s ‘‘Integrated
Review Plan for the National Ambient
Air Quality Standard for Particulate
Matter’’ (EPA/452/P–08/006) was made
available in October 2007 for public
comment and was discussed by the
CASAC via a publicly accessible
teleconference consultation on
November 30, 2007 (72 FR 63177). EPA
finalized the plan and made it available
in March 2008 (EPA/452/R–08/004;
https://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/
standards/pm/s_pm_2007_pd.html). In
June 2008 (73 FR 30391), EPA held a
workshop to discuss, with invited
scientific experts, initial draft materials
prepared in the development of the PM
ISA and its supplementary annexes.
The first external review draft ISA for
PM will be discussed at a public
meeting for review by CASAC, and
public comments received will be
provided to the CASAC review panel. A
future Federal Register notice will
inform the public of the exact date and
time of that CASAC meeting.
II. How to Submit Technical Comments
to the Docket at https://
www.regulations.gov
Submit your comments, identified by
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–ORD–2007–
0517, by one of the following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: ORD.Docket@epa.gov.
• Fax: 202–566–1753.
• Mail: Office of Environmental
Information (OEI) Docket (Mail Code:
2822T), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. The phone
number is 202–566–1752.
• Hand Delivery: The OEI Docket is
located in the EPA Headquarters Docket
Center, Room 3334 EPA West Building,
1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. The EPA Docket
Center Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is 202–566–1744.
Such deliveries are only accepted
during the docket’s normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
If you provide comments by mail or
hand delivery, please submit three
copies of the comments. For
attachments, provide an index, number
pages consecutively with the comments,
and submit an unbound original and
three copies.
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 245 (Friday, December 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77683-77686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-30201]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2008-0790; FRL-8754-4]
Asbestos-Containing Materials in Schools; State Request for
Waiver From Requirements
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed approval and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action provides notice and an opportunity for public
hearing, and solicits written comments on EPA's proposed waiver of the
requirements of the Federal asbestos-in-schools program for the State
of New Hampshire. A waiver request will be granted if EPA determines
that the State of New Hampshire is implementing or intends to implement
a state program of asbestos inspection and management that is at least
as stringent as the federal program. This action provides notice and an
opportunity for a public hearing, and solicits written comments on the
waiver request submitted by the State of New Hampshire.
DATES: Written comments under Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2008-0790
must be received by February 17, 2009. Each comment must include the
name and address of the submitter. Any request for a public hearing
must be in writing, and be received on or before February 17, 2009, and
detail specific objections to the grant of the waiver. If, during the
comment period, EPA receives such a request for a public hearing, EPA
will schedule a public hearing in New Hampshire following the comment
period. EPA will announce the date of the public hearing in the Federal
Register.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OPPT-2008-0790, by one of the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: bryson.jamesm@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (617) 918-0563.
4. Mail: Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2008-0790, Asbestos
Coordinator, Region 1--New England, Environmental Protection Agency,
One Congress Street, Suite 1100 Mailcode SEP, Boston, MA 02114-2023.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: James M. Bryson, Asbestos Coordinator,
Region 1--New England, Environmental Protection Agency, One Congress
Street, Suite 1100 Mailcode SEP, Boston, MA 02114-2023. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 to 5, excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-
2008-0790. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit through https://www.regulations.gov
or e-mail, information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected.
The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information about EPA's public docket visit the
EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
[[Page 77684]]
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy with the Asbestos
Coordinator, Region 1--New England, Environmental Protection Agency,
One Congress Street, Suite 1100 Mailcode SEP, Boston, MA 02114-2023.
EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 to 5 excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information contact: Colby
Lintner, Regulatory Coordinator, Environmental Assistance Division
(7408M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (202) 564-8182; e-mail address: TSCA-
Hotline@epa.gov.
For technical information contact: James M. Bryson, Asbestos
Coordinator, Region 1--New England, Environmental Protection Agency,
One Congress Street, Suite 1100 Mailcode SEP, Boston, MA 02114-2023;
telephone number: (617) 918-1524; e-mail address:
bryson.jamesm@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. What Action Is the Agency (EPA) Taking?
EPA is considering granting a waiver of the asbestos-in-schools
program to the State of New Hampshire. This notice is issued, and the
waiver, if granted, would be issued under Section 203(m) of the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) and 40 CFR 763.98. Section 203 is within
Title II of TSCA, the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA).
The Agency recognizes that a waiver granted to any State would not
encompass schools operated under the defense dependents' education
system (the third type of local education agency (LEA) defined at TSCA
section 202(7) and 40 CFR 763.83, which serve dependents in overseas
areas, and other elementary and secondary schools outside a State's
jurisdiction, which generally includes schools in Indian country. Such
schools would remain subject to EPA's asbestos-in-schools program.
B. What Is the Agency's Authority for Taking This Action?
In 1987, under TSCA section 203, at 15 U.S.C. 2643, the Agency
promulgated regulations that require the identification and management
of asbestos-containing material by LEAs in the nation's elementary and
secondary school buildings: the ``AHERA Schools Rule'' (40 CFR part
763, subpart E). Under section 203(m) of TSCA and 40 CFR 763.98, upon
request by a State Governor and after notice and comment and
opportunity for a public hearing in the State, EPA may waive, in whole
or in part, the requirements of the asbestos-in-schools program (TSCA
section 203 and the AHERA Schools Rule) if EPA determines that the
State has established and is implementing or intends to implement a
program of asbestos inspection and management that contains
requirements that are at least as stringent as those in the Agency's
asbestos-in-schools program. A State seeking a waiver must submit its
request to the EPA Region in which that State is located.
C. When Did New Hampshire Submit Its Request for a Waiver and How Is
EPA Proposing To Respond?
On July 15, 2008, Governor John H. Lynch submitted to the EPA
Region 1 Regional Administrator, a letter with supporting documentation
requesting a full waiver of the requirements of EPA's asbestos-in-
schools program pursuant to the AHERA statute and 40 CFR 763.98. The
EPA Region 1 Administrator indicated to New Hampshire, by letter dated
July 31, 2008, that the request was received. On September 30, 2008,
the Manager of EPA's Toxics and Pesticides Unit submitted comments to
the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Service's Air Resources
Division regarding the AHERA waiver request. The State provided EPA
with a response, dated October 10, 2008, in which each of EPA's
comments was addressed.
EPA is hereby issuing this notice in the Federal Register
announcing receipt of the complete New Hampshire waiver request and an
opportunity for public comment and a hearing (if necessary) and, also,
making the request and supporting documentation available in the public
record for this notice. The Agency is also describing the information
submitted by New Hampshire and EPA's preliminary determination as to
how the waiver request meets the criteria for granting a waiver.
D. What Was EPA's Determination With Regard to the Completeness of New
Hampshire's Waiver Request?
The New Hampshire waiver request was deemed complete 30 days after
receipt by EPA with regard to the required contents of a waiver
request, as specified at 40 CFR 763.98. In particular, the State's
waiver request contains the following information from, and
representations by, New Hampshire:
1. A copy of the New Hampshire regulatory provisions relating to
its program. These consist of the following, as well as other
supporting documentation: (a) A copy of the proposed New Hampshire
regulatory provisions related to its program of asbestos inspection and
management in Schools RSA 141-E:4, I and II, Chapter Env-A 1800
Asbestos Management And Control Regulations, (b) A comparison of the
New Hampshire School Program RSA 141-E:4, I and II, Chapter Env-A 1800
Asbestos Management And Control Regulations, to the EPA program at 40
CFR part 763, Subpart E, (c) an assurance of Legal Authority from New
Hampshire Attorney General, and (d) a reference to the New Hampshire
Compliance Assurance Response Policy (CARP) at https://des.nh.gov/
organization/commissioner/legal/carp/index.htm which describes New
Hampshire's approach to enforcement, relevant legal authorities, and
penalty calculations. New Hampshire intends to use as guidance EPA's
January 31, 1989 AHERA Enforcement Response Policy (ERP) to calculate
penalties based on determinations of the circumstance level and extent
of severity applicable to specific violations.
2. The agency that is responsible for administrating and enforcing
the requirements for which a waiver is requested is the New Hampshire
Department of Environmental Services (DES), Division of Air Resources,
Compliance Bureau. The officials within the Compliance Bureau who are
responsible for New Hampshire's asbestos-in-schools program are: Pamela
G. Monroe, Compliance Bureau Administrator; Barbara L. Hoffman,
Compliance and Enforcement Programs Manager; Stephen G. Cullinane,
Asbestos Program Manager; Marjorie Yin, AHERA Specialist; and Elizabeth
Nixon, Enforcement Section Supervisor.
3. Detailed reasons, supporting papers, and rationale for
concluding that New Hampshire's asbestos inspection and management
programs, for which the waiver request is made, are at least as
stringent as the
[[Page 77685]]
requirements of the AHERA Schools Rule (40 CFR part 763, subpart E).
4. New Hampshire neither highlighted nor discussed any special
situations, problems, and needs pertaining to the State's waiver
request. Accordingly, no explanation of how the State would handle the
issues was provided.
5. A statement of the resources that New Hampshire intends to
devote to the administration and enforcement of the provisions relating
to the waiver request.
6. Copies of any specific or enabling New Hampshire laws and
regulations relating to the request, including provisions for assessing
criminal and/or civil penalties.
7. Assurance from the Governor, that DES has the legal authority
necessary to carry out the requirements relating to the waiver request,
as indicated in the July 15, 2008, letter from Governor Lynch of New
Hampshire to the EPA Region TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov 1 Regional
Administrator.
E. What Are the Criteria for EPA's Grant of the Waiver?
EPA may waive some or all of the requirements of the Agency's
asbestos-in-schools program if the Agency determines that New Hampshire
has met the criteria set forth at 40 CFR 763.98. The specific criteria
and EPA's preliminary determination for each relative to the grant of
the waiver to New Hampshire are set forth below:
1. The State's lead agency has the legal authority necessary to
carry out the provisions of asbestos inspection and management in
schools relating to the waiver request.
Preliminary Determination--EPA has determined preliminarily that
the statutory and regulatory provisions cited at Section I.D.1 of this
notice gives DES' Division of Air Resources the legal authority
necessary to carry out the provisions of asbestos inspection and
management in schools relating to the waiver request.
2. The State's program of asbestos inspection and management in
schools and its implementation of the program are or will be at least
as stringent as the requirements of the AHERA Schools Rule.
Preliminary Determination--EPA has determined preliminarily that
New Hampshire's program is at least as stringent as EPA's program. On
October 10, 2008, New Hampshire addressed the EPA recommended revisions
as provided in EPA's September 30, 2008 correspondence. On October 16,
2008 New Hampshire's Joint Legislative Committee on Administrative
Rules approved the New Hampshire RSA 141-E:4, I and II, Chapter Env-A
1800 Asbestos Management and Control Regulations.
3. The State has an enforcement mechanism to allow it to implement
the program described in the waiver request.
Preliminary Determination--EPA has determined preliminarily that
the compliance and enforcement provisions of New Hampshire's asbestos-
in-schools program are adequate to run the program. DES is authorized
by RSA 141-E to implement a program of asbestos licensing, inspection
and management. DES has the authority to enter any public building,
facility, school, or rental dwelling to ``cause inspections to be
carried out'' if the agency has reason to suspect the presence of
regulated asbestos-containing material RSA 141-E:8. DES has authority
to enter any asbestos abatement worksite, obtain samples for air
testing and monitoring, procure and examine licenses issued under RSA
141-E:10 and certificates issued under RSA 141-E:11, and to request,
inspect, and record information or test results relating to school
asbestos abatement planning activities. RSA 141-E:13.
DES has the authority to enforce the state's asbestos laws and
rules through orders and notices of abatement. RSA 141-E:14. DES has
the authority to impose administrative fines up to $2,000 per
violation. RSA 141-E:16. Through the NH Attorney General, DES can seek
civil penalties up to $25,000 per day as well as injunctive relief for
violations of RSA 141-E and any rule adopted thereunder. RSA 141-E:17.
Any person who knowingly and willfully violates any provisions of RSA
141-E or any rule adopted thereunder, or who violates any term or
condition of a license, certification or order issued under RSA 141-E,
or who makes or certifies a material false statement relative to any
document or information required under RSA 141-E is guilty of a class B
felony and can be fined $25,000 per day per violation. RSA 141-E:15. To
help ensure compliance with its asbestos regulations, DES will revise
their Neutral Administrative Inspection Scheme (NAIS) for targeting
compliance inspections. By focusing on activities where problems are
most likely to occur, the NAIS is designed to maximize the
effectiveness of DES' inspection/enforcement efforts toward preventing
and controlling asbestos-related risks to human health and the
environment.
4. The State has or will have qualified personnel to carry out the
provisions relating to the waiver request.
Preliminary Determination--EPA has determined preliminarily that
New Hampshire has qualified personnel to carry out the provisions of
the waiver. The existing program staff includes 2 employees trained to
enforce the requirements of 40 CFR part 763, subpart E. The program
will be carried out by staff in the DES' Division of Air Resources,
Compliance Bureau. New Hampshire commits approximately 2 persons each
year to AHERA compliance monitoring and enforcement activities under
the EPA TSCA Asbestos Enforcement Grant. Staff is fully trained and
certified as Contractor/Supervisor, Inspector, and Management Planner.
5. The State will devote adequate resources to the administration
and enforcement of the asbestos inspection and management provisions
relating to the waiver request.
Preliminary Determination--EPA has determined preliminarily that
the resources developed by DES' Division of Air Resources are adequate
to effectively administer and enforce the provisions of the asbestos
program in New Hampshire. In particular, New Hampshire is currently
expected to receive funding through an EPA grant in the amount of
$100,000 annually which, when combined with State matching funds of
approximately $33,000, results in a total funding level of $133,000 for
this FY 2009.
6. The State has responded to EPA and addressed all of the Agency's
concerns in numbers 2 through 4 above.
Preliminary Determination--EPA will grant a full waiver as long as
New Hampshire continues its asbestos-in-schools implementation and
enforcement strategy utilizing adequate resources. EPA may evaluate
periodically the adequacy of New Hampshire's program under 40 CFR
763.98, and under circumstances set forth in the regulation.
F. What Recordkeeping and Reporting Burden Approvals Apply to the New
Hampshire Waiver Request?
The recordkeeping and reporting burden associated with waiver
requests was approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under OMB control number XXXX-XXX. This document simply announces the
Agency's receipt of the New Hampshire waiver request and therefore it
imposes no additional burden beyond that covered under existing OMB
control number XXXX-XXXX.
II. Materials in the Official Record
The official record, under Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2008-0790,
[[Page 77686]]
contains the New Hampshire waiver request and other supporting,
relevant documents underlying the State's request and EPA's proposed
approval in response to the request.
Dated: November 30, 2008.
Robert W. Varney,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. E8-30201 Filed 12-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P