Administrative Practice and Procedure, Postal Service, 77512-77517 [E8-30169]
Download as PDF
77512
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
identifying number for each employee
(e.g., the last four digits of the
employee’s social security number). The
required weekly payroll information
may be submitted in any form desired.
Optional Form WH–347 is available for
this purpose from the Wage and Hour
Division Web site at https://
www.dol.gov/esa/whd/forms/
wh347instr.htm or its successor site.
The prime contractor is responsible for
the submission of copies of payrolls by
all subcontractors. Contractors and
subcontractors shall maintain the full
social security number and current
address of each covered worker, and
shall provide them upon request to the
(write in name of appropriate federal
agency) if the agency is a party to the
contract, but if the agency is not such
a party, the contractor will submit them
to the applicant, sponsor, or owner, as
the case may be, for transmission to the
(write in name of agency), the
contractor, or the Wage and Hour
Division of the Department of Labor for
purposes of an investigation or audit of
compliance with prevailing wage
requirements. It is not a violation of this
section for a prime contractor to require
a subcontractor to provide addresses
and social security numbers to the
prime contractor for its own records,
without weekly submission to the
sponsoring government agency (or the
applicant, sponsor, or owner).
(B) * * *
(1) That the payroll for the payroll
period contains the information
required to be provided under § 5.5
(a)(3)(ii) of Regulations, 29 CFR part 5,
the appropriate information is being
maintained under § 5.5 (a)(3)(i) of
Regulations, 29 CFR part 5, and that
such information is correct and
complete;
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–29886 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–27–P
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard published a
document in the Federal Register of
October 14, 2008, concerning expired
temporary rules. The document
contained an incorrect contact
telephone number, an incorrect table
entry, and an omission.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions on this notice contact Ms.
Lesley Mose, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law, telephone (202)
372–3863. For questions on viewing, or
on submitting material to the docket,
contact Ms. Angie Ames, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–5115.
Correction
In the Federal Register of October 14,
2008, in FR Doc. E8–23956, on page
60629, in the second column under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, correct
the Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law telephone number
to read ‘‘202–372–3863’’; on the same
page, in the table, remove the entry for
Docket No. USCG–2008–0102; and on
page 60630, in the table insert the entry
for Docket No. USCG–2008–0402
reading ‘‘Boca Grande, FL, Safety Zones
(Parts 147 and 165), 6/7/2008’’ in
numerical order.
Dated: December 9, 2008.
S.G. Venckus,
Chief, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law.
[FR Doc. E8–29736 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3020
[Docket Nos. MC2009–8 and CP2009–9;
Order No. 147]
Administrative Practice and Procedure,
Postal Service
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 147 and 165
[USCG–2008–0181]
Quarterly Listings; Anchorages, Safety
Zones, Security Zones, Special Local
Regulations, Regulated Navigation
Areas, and Drawbridge Operation
Regulations; Correction
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of expired temporary
rules issued; correction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:44 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
SUMMARY: The Commission is adding a
new international mail product to the
Competitive Product List. This product
is a contract between the United States
Postal Service and Canada Post for
inbound competitive services. It
modifies and extends an existing
agreement. The Commission’s action is
consistent with changes to applicable
federal law and regulations and with a
recent Postal Service request.
Republication of the lists of market
dominant and competitive products is
also consistent with requirements in the
law.
DATES: Effective December 19, 2008.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202–789–6820 and
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulatory
History, 73 FR 70681 (November 21,
2008).
The Postal Service seeks to add a new
product identified as Canada PostUnited States Postal Service Contractual
Bilateral Agreement for Inbound
Competitive Services (MC2009–8 and
CP2009–9) to the Competitive Product
List. For the reasons discussed below,
the Commission approves the Request.
I. Background
On November 13, 2008, the Postal
Service filed a formal request pursuant
to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30
et seq. to add the Canada Post-United
States Postal Service Contractual
Bilateral Agreement for Inbound
Competitive Services (Bilateral
Agreement) to the Competitive Product
List.1 The Postal Service asserts that the
Contractual Bilateral Agreement is a
competitive product ‘‘not of general
applicability’’ within the meaning of 39
U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). This Request has been
assigned Docket No. MC2009–8.
The Postal Service
contemporaneously filed notice,
pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39
CFR 3015.5, that the Governors have
established prices and classifications
not of general applicability for inbound
competitive services as reflected in the
Bilateral Agreement. More specifically,
the Bilateral Agreement, which has been
assigned Docket No. CP2009–9, governs
the exchange of Inbound Surface Parcel
Post from Canada.
In support of its Request, the Postal
Service filed a redacted version of the
Governors’ Decision establishing prices
for the Bilateral Agreement. Attached to
the Governors’ Decision are proposed
Mail Classification Schedule language; a
redacted version of management’s
analysis of the Bilateral Agreement;
certification of compliance with 39
U.S.C. 3633(a); certification of the
Governors’ vote; 2 and a Statement of
Supporting Justification as required by
39 CFR 3020.32.3 In addition, the Postal
1 Request of United States Postal Service to Add
Canada Post-United States Postal Service
Contractual Bilateral Agreement for Inbound
Competitive Services to the Competitive Product
List, and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) the Enabling
Governors’ Decision and Agreement, November 13,
2008 (Request).
2 See Attachment 1 to the Request.
3 See Attachment 2 to the Request.
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Service indicates that it filed an
unredacted copy of the Governors’
Decision, the Bilateral Agreement, and
other supporting documents designed to
establish compliance with 39 CFR
3015.5 under seal. Request at 2, n.2.
In the Statement of Supporting
Justification, Lea Emerson, Executive
Director, International Postal Affairs,
asserts that ‘‘[t]he addition of the
[Bilateral] Agreement as a competitive
product will enable the Commission to
verify that the agreement covers its
attributable costs and enables
competitive products, as a whole, to
make a positive contribution to coverage
of institutional costs.’’ Id. at 2. W.
Ashley Lyons, Manager, Corporate
Financial Planning, Finance
Department, certifies that the contract
complies with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a).
Request, Attachment C. He observes that
the Bilateral Agreement ‘‘should not
impair the ability of competitive
products on the whole to cover an
appropriate share of institutional
costs.’’Id.
The Postal Service filed much of the
supporting materials, including the
Governors’ Decision and the Bilateral
Agreement, under seal. It maintains that
the Bilateral Agreement, related
financial information, and the
Governor’s Decision should remain
under seal as they contain pricing, cost,
and other information that are highly
confidential. Request at 2.4
The Postal Service has an existing
bilateral agreement with Canada Post
which is set to expire December 31,
2008. Id. at 3. The new prices and
classifications modify the current
agreement, extend it for 1 year, and are
scheduled to take effect January 1, 2009,
or ‘‘after filing with and review by the
Postal Regulatory Commission,
whichever, is later.’’ Request,
Attachment 1, at 2.
In Order No. 134, the Commission
gave notice of the two dockets,
appointed a public representative, and
provided the public with an opportunity
to comment.5 Pursuant to 39 CFR
3015.6, Chairman’s Information Request
No.1 was issued November 24, 2008.
4 The Postal Service indicates that the materials
filed under seal constitute a subset of the
overarching agreement between the parties,
representing the parties’ agreement concerning
inbound competitive services. The Postal Service
further indicates that the parties anticipate
finalizing ‘‘this and related agreements by midDecember, and any lingering details will not affect
the rates, classification, or other fundamental basis
for this Request and Notice.’’ Request at 5, n.12.
5 PRC Order No. 134, Notice and Order
Concerning Bilateral Agreement with Canada Post
For Inbound Competitive Services, November 18,
2008 (Order No. 134).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:44 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
The Postal Service filed its response on
December 1, 2008 as requested.6
II. Comments
Comments were filed by the Public
Representative.7 No filings were
submitted by other interested parties.
The Public Representative’s comments
focus principally on confidentiality and
pricing under the contract. Public
Representative Comments at 3–4.
The Public Representative states that
a sufficient rationale for maintaining the
confidentiality of the documents under
seal has been provided by the Postal
Service. He reviewed the cost savings
measures for the contract and
determined that the contract is
advantageous to the Postal Service and
beneficial to the general public. Id. He
notes that the Commission’s 2007
Annual Compliance Determination
(ACD) found that Inbound Surface
Parcel Post under the bilateral
agreement with Canada incurred a loss
and the Postal Service is attempting to
remedy this issue with this agreement.8
Additionally, he observes that the payfor-performance standards will improve
the performance of both postal
administrations. He concludes, inter
alia, that the contract appears to meet
each element of 39 U.S.C. 3633(a). Id. at
2.
III. Commission Analysis
The Commission has reviewed the
contract, the financial analysis provided
under seal that accompanies it, the
additional information filed by the
Postal Service in response to the
Chairman’s Information Request, and
the comments filed by the Public
Representative.
Statutory requirements. The
Commission’s statutory responsibilities
in this instance entail assigning the
Bilateral Agreement with Canada Post
for Inbound Competitive Services to
either the Market Dominant Product List
or to the Competitive Product List. 39
U.S.C. 3642. As part of this
responsibility, the Commission also
6 Response of United States Postal Service to
Chairman’s Information Request No. 1 and Notice
of Filing of Responsive Materials (Under Seal)
December 1, 2008 (Response).
7 Public Representative Comments in Response to
United States Postal Service Request to add Canada
Post-United States Postal Service Contractual
Bilateral Agreement for Inbound Competitive
Services, to the Competitive Product List, and
Notice of Filing (Under Seal) the Enabling
Governors’ Decision and Agreement, December 3,
2008 (Public Representative Comments).
8 In the ACD summary of International Mail,
issued March 27, 2008, the Commission concludes
that revenue for competitive Inbound Surface Parcel
Post (at non-UPU rates) did not cover its
corresponding attributable costs by a relatively
small amount.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77513
reviews the proposal for compliance
with the Postal Accountability and
Enhancement Act (PAEA) requirements.
This includes, for proposed competitive
products, a review of the provisions
applicable to rates for competitive
products. 39 U.S.C. 3633.
Product list assignment. In
determining whether to assign the
Bilateral Agreement with Canada Post
for Inbound Competitive Services as a
product to the Market Dominant
Product List or the Competitive Product
List, the Commission must consider
whether
the Postal Service exercises sufficient market
power that it can effectively set the price of
such product substantially above costs, raise
prices significantly, decrease quality, or
decrease output, without risk of losing a
significant level of business to other firms
offering similar products.
39 U.S.C. 3642(b)(1). If so, the product
will be categorized as market dominant.
The competitive category of products
shall consist of all other products.
The Commission is further required to
consider the availability and nature of
enterprises in the private sector engaged
in the delivery of the product, the views
of those who use the product and the
likely impact on small business
concerns. 39 U.S.C. 3642(b)(3).
In Docket No. RM2007–1, Order No.
43, the Commission determined that
Inbound Surface Parcel Post shipments
tendered at negotiated rates are
appropriately classified as competitive.
The Canada Post Bilateral Agreement
falls within this category.
The Postal Service asserts that its
bargaining position is constrained by
the existence of other shippers who can
provide similar services, thus
precluding it from taking unilateral
action to increase prices without the
risk of losing volume to private
companies. Request, Attachment 2, at 2–
3. The Postal Service also contends that
it may not decrease quality or output
without risking the loss of business to
competitors that offer similar expedited
delivery services. Id. Finally, the Postal
Service states that the market for
international parcel delivery services is
highly competitive and that the
agreement provides a benefit to Canada
Post’s and the Postal Service’s small
business customers by providing an
additional option for shipping articles
between the United States and Canada.
It concludes that there should be little,
if any negative impact on small
business. Id. at 4.
No commenter opposes the proposed
classification of the Canada Post-United
States Postal Service Contractual
Bilateral Agreement for Inbound
Competitive Services, as competitive.
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
77514
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Having considered the statutory
requirements and the support offered by
the Postal Service, the Commission
finds that the Canada Post-United Postal
Service Contractual Bilateral Agreement
for Inbound Competitive Services is
appropriately classified as a competitive
product and should be added to the
Competitive Product List.
Cost considerations. The Postal
Service’s filing seeks to establish a new
product for Inbound Surface Parcel Post
from Canada. The Postal Service asserts
the rates provide financial benefits for
inbound competitive services which are
better than those that would exist if the
rates used are set by the Universal
Postal Union (UPU) treaty. Request,
Attachment 1B, at 1.
The Postal Service contends, as
mentioned in the comments of the
Public Representative, adding the
Canada Post-United States Postal
Service Contractual Bilateral Agreement
for Inbound Competitive Services
product will result in better cost
coverage for Inbound Surface Parcel
Post and address the Commission’s
concern about cost coverage as
expressed in the Annual Compliance
Determination for Fiscal Year 2007. The
Commission’s summary and findings for
International Mail concluded that
revenues for corresponding competitive
Inbound Surface Parcel Post at non-UPU
rates did not provide revenues that
covered attributable costs. The Postal
Service states that its financial analysis
of the new prices negotiated in this
agreement shows that this contract
covers its attributable costs, and does
not result in subsidization of
competitive products by market
dominant products and should not
impair the ability of competitive
products on the whole to cover an
appropriate share of institutional costs.
Id., Attachment 1C, at 1.
Based on the data submitted and the
comments received, the Commission
finds that Canada Post-United States
Postal Service Contractual Bilateral
Agreement for Inbound Competitive
Services should cover its attributable
costs (39 U.S.C. 3633(a)(2)), should not
lead to the subsidization of competitive
products by market dominant products
(39 U.S.C. 3633(a)(1)), and should have
a positive effect on competitive
products’ contribution to institutional
costs (39 U.S.C. 3633(a)(3)). Thus, an
initial review of the proposed Canada
Post-United States Postal Service
Contractual Bilateral Agreement for
Inbound Competitive Services indicates
that it comports with the provisions
applicable to rates for competitive
products.
It is our understanding that this
contract extension will terminate
December 31, 2009. If this is not the
case, the Postal Service shall promptly
notify the Commission when the
contract terminates, but no later than
the actual termination date. The
Commission will then remove the
contract from the Mail Classification
Schedule at the earliest possible
opportunity.
In conclusion, the Commission
approves the Canada Post-United States
Postal Service Contractual Bilateral
Agreement for Inbound Competitive
Services as a new product. The revision
to the Competitive Product List is
shown below the signature of this Order
and is effective upon issuance of this
Order.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is Ordered:
1. Canada Post-United States Postal
Service Contractual Bilateral Agreement
for Inbound Competitive Services
(MC2009–8 and CP2009–9) is added to
the Competitive Product List as a new
product under International Inbound
Surface Parcel Post (at non-UPU) rates.
2. The Secretary shall arrange for the
publication of this Order in the Federal
Register.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 3020
Administrative practice and
procedure, Postal Service.
By the Commission.
Steven W. Williams,
Secretary.
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
under the authority at 39 U.S.C. 503, the
Postal Regulatory Commission amends
39 CFR part 3020 as follows:
■
PART 3020—PRODUCT LISTS
1. The authority citation for part 3020
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 39 U.S.C. 503; 3622; 3631; 3642;
3682.
2. Revise Appendix A to subpart A of
part 3020—Mail Classification to read as
follows:
■
APPENDIX A TO SUBPART A OF SUBPART A OF PART 3020—MAIL CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE
Part A—Market Dominant Products
1000 Market Dominant Product List
First-Class Mail
Single-Piece Letters/Postcards
Bulk Letters/Postcards
Flats
Parcels
Outbound Single-Piece First-Class Mail International
Inbound Single-Piece First-Class Mail International
Standard Mail (Regular and Nonprofit)
High Density and Saturation Letters
High Density and Saturation Flats/Parcels
Carrier Route
Letters
Flats
Not Flat-Machinables (NFMs)/Parcels
Periodicals
Within County Periodicals
Outside County Periodicals
Package Services
Single-Piece Parcel Post
Inbound Surface Parcel Post (at UPU rates)
Bound Printed Matter Flats
Bound Printed Matter Parcels
Media Mail/Library Mail
Special Services
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:44 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
APPENDIX A TO SUBPART A OF SUBPART A OF PART 3020—MAIL CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE—Continued
Ancillary Services
International Ancillary Services
Address List Services
Caller Service
Change-of-Address Credit Card Authentication
Confirm
International Reply Coupon Service
International Business Reply Mail Service
Money Orders
Post Office Box Service
Negotiated Service Agreements
HSBC North America Holdings Inc. Negotiated Service Agreement
Bookspan Negotiated Service Agreement
Bank of America Corporation Negotiated Service Agreement
The Bradford Group Negotiated Service Agreement
Market Dominant Product Descriptions
First-Class Mail [Reserved for Class Description]
Single-Piece Letters/Postcards [Reserved for Product Description]
Bulk Letters/Postcards [Reserved for Product Description]
Flats [Reserved for Product Description]
Parcels [Reserved for Product Description]
Outbound Single-Piece First-Class Mail International [Reserved for Product Description]
Inbound Single-Piece First-Class Mail International [Reserved for Product Description]
Standard Mail (Regular and Nonprofit) [Reserved for Class Description]
High Density and Saturation Letters [Reserved for Product Description]
High Density and Saturation Flats/Parcels [Reserved for Product Description]
Carrier Route [Reserved for Product Description]
Letters [Reserved for Product Description]
Flats [Reserved for Product Description]
Not Flat-Machinables (NFMs)/Parcels [Reserved for Product Description]
Periodicals [Reserved for Class Description]
Within County Periodicals [Reserved for Product Description]
Outside County Periodicals [Reserved for Product Description]
Package Services [Reserved for Class Description]
Single-Piece Parcel Post [Reserved for Product Description]
Inbound Surface Parcel Post (at UPU rates) [Reserved for Product Description]
Bound Printed Matter Flats [Reserved for Product Description]
Bound Printed Matter Parcels [Reserved for Product Description]
Media Mail/Library Mail [Reserved for Product Description]
Special Services [Reserved for Class Description]
Ancillary Services [Reserved for Product Description]
Address Correction Service [Reserved for Product Description]
Applications and Mailing Permits [Reserved for Product Description]
Business Reply Mail [Reserved for Product Description]
Bulk Parcel Return Service [Reserved for Product Description]
Certified Mail [Reserved for Product Description]
Certificate of Mailing [Reserved for Product Description]
Collect on Delivery [Reserved for Product Description]
Delivery Confirmation [Reserved for Product Description]
Insurance [Reserved for Product Description]
Merchandise Return Service [Reserved for Product Description]
Parcel Airlift (PAL) [Reserved for Product Description]
Registered Mail [Reserved for Product Description]
Return Receipt [Reserved for Product Description]
Return Receipt for Merchandise [Reserved for Product Description]
Restricted Delivery [Reserved for Product Description]
Shipper-Paid Forwarding [Reserved for Product Description]
Signature Confirmation [Reserved for Product Description]
Special Handling [Reserved for Product Description]
Stamped Envelopes [Reserved for Product Description]
Stamped Cards [Reserved for Product Description]
Premium Stamped Stationery [Reserved for Product Description]
Premium Stamped Cards [Reserved for Product Description]
International Ancillary Services [Reserved for Product Description]
International Certificate of Mailing [Reserved for Product Description]
International Registered Mail [Reserved for Product Description]
International Return Receipt [Reserved for Product Description]
International Restricted Delivery [Reserved for Product Description]
Address List Services [Reserved for Product Description]
Caller Service [Reserved for Product Description]
Change-of-Address Credit Card Authentication [Reserved for Product Description]
Confirm [Reserved for Product Description]
International Reply Coupon Service [Reserved for Product Description]
International Business Reply Mail Service [Reserved for Product Description]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:44 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
77515
77516
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
APPENDIX A TO SUBPART A OF SUBPART A OF PART 3020—MAIL CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE—Continued
Money Orders [Reserved for Product Description]
Post Office Box Service [Reserved for Product Description]
Negotiated Service Agreements [Reserved for Class Description]
HSBC North America Holdings Inc. Negotiated Service Agreement [Reserved for Product Description]
Bookspan Negotiated Service Agreement [Reserved for Product Description]
Bank of America Corporation Negotiated Service Agreement
The Bradford Group Negotiated Service Agreement
Part B—Competitive Products
Competitive Product List
Express Mail
Express Mail
Outbound International Expedited Services
Inbound International Expedited Services
Inbound International Expedited Services 1 (CP2008–7)
Priority Mail
Priority Mail
Outbound Priority Mail International
Inbound Air Parcel Post
Parcel Select
Parcel Return Service
International
International Priority Airlift (IPA)
International Surface Airlift (ISAL)
International Direct Sacks—M-Bags
Global Customized Shipping Services
Inbound Surface Parcel Post (at non-UPU rates)
Canada Post—United States Postal Service Contractual Bilateral Agreement for Inbound Competitive Services (MC2009–8 and
CP2009–9)
International Money Transfer Service
International Ancillary Services
Special Services
Premium Forwarding Service
Negotiated Service Agreements
Domestic
Express Mail Contract 1 (MC2008–5)
Express Mail Contract 2 (MC2009–3 and CP2009–4)
Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 1 (MC2009–6 and CP2009–7)
Parcel Return Service Contract 1 (MC2009–1 and CP2009–2)
Priority Mail Contract 1 (MC2008–8 and CP2008–26)
Priority Mail Contract 2 (MC2009–2 and CP2009–3)
Priority Mail Contract 3 (MC2009–4 and CP2009–5)
Priority Mail Contract 4 (MC2009–5 and CP2009–6)
Outbound International
Global Expedited Package Services (GEPS) Contracts
GEPS 1 (CP2008–5, CP2008–11, CP2008–12, and CP2008–13, CP2008–18, CP2008–19, CP2008–20, CP2008–21, CP2008–22,
CP2008–23, and CP2008–24)
Global Plus Contracts
Global Plus 1 (CP2008–9 and CP2008–10)
Global Plus 2 (MC2008–7, CP2008–16 and CP2008–17)
Inbound Direct Entry Contracts with Foreign Postal Administrations (MC2008–6, CP2008–14 and CP2008–15)
Competitive Product Descriptions
Express Mail [Reserved for Group Description]
Express Mail [Reserved for Product Description]
Outbound International Expedited Services [Reserved for Product Description]
Inbound International Expedited Services [Reserved for Product Description]
Priority [Reserved for Product Description]
Priority Mail [Reserved for Product Description]
Outbound Priority Mail International [Reserved for Product Description]
Inbound Air Parcel Post [Reserved for Product Description]
Parcel Select [Reserved for Group Description]
Parcel Return Service [Reserved for Group Description]
International [Reserved for Group Description]
International Priority Airlift (IPA) [Reserved for Product Description]
International Surface Airlift (ISAL) [Reserved for Product Description]
International Direct Sacks—M–Bags [Reserved for Product Description]
Global Customized Shipping Services [Reserved for Product Description]
International Money Transfer Service [Reserved for Product Description]
Inbound Surface Parcel Post (at non-UPU rates) [Reserved for Product Description]
International Ancillary Services [Reserved for Product Description]
International Certificate of Mailing [Reserved for Product Description]
International Registered Mail [Reserved for Product Description]
International Return Receipt [Reserved for Product Description]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:44 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
77517
APPENDIX A TO SUBPART A OF SUBPART A OF PART 3020—MAIL CLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE—Continued
International Restricted Delivery [Reserved for Product Description]
International Insurance [Reserved for Product Description]
Negotiated Service Agreements [Reserved for Group Description]
Domestic [Reserved for Product Description]
Outbound International [Reserved for Group Description]
[FR Doc. E8–30169 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 58
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2006–0735; FRL–8754–9]
RIN 2060–AN83
National Ambient Air Quality
Standards for Lead
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Correcting amendment.
SUMMARY: The EPA issued a final rule
on November 12, 2008 (effective date
January 12, 2009) that revised the
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS) for lead (Pb) and associated
monitoring requirements. This
document makes a minor correction to
the November 12, 2008, action to correct
a typographical error in the regulatory
text for the rule.
DATES: This correction is effective
January 12, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Kevin Cavender, Air Quality
Assessment Division (C304–06), Office
of Air Quality Planning and Standards,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711; telephone number: (919) 541–
2364; fax number: (919) 541–1903; email address: Cavender.kevin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The EPA issued a final rule on
November 12, 2008 (effective date
January 12, 2009) that revised the
NAAQS for Pb and associated Pb
monitoring requirements. As part of the
Pb monitoring requirements, monitoring
agencies are required to develop a plan
for establishing Pb monitoring sites in
accordance with the requirements of
appendix D of Part 58. A number of
requirements for this plan were listed
including the identification of (1) the
designation of any Pb monitors as either
source-oriented or non-source-oriented
according to Appendix D to 40 CFR part
58, (2) any source-oriented monitors for
which a waiver has been requested or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:44 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
granted by the EPA Regional
Administrator as allowed for under
paragraph 4.5(a)(ii) of Appendix D to 40
CFR part 58, and (3) any source-oriented
or non-source-oriented site for which a
waiver has been requested or granted by
the EPA Regional Administrator for the
use of Pb-PM10 monitoring in lieu of PbTSP monitoring as allowed for under
paragraph 2.10 of Appendix C to 40 CFR
Part 58. These requirements were
correctly included in the amended
regulatory text for 40 CFR Part 58 in the
final rule. In describing the amendments
to the existing regulatory text, EPA
accurately included a reference adding
paragraph 58.10 (b)(9) (which contains
the first requirement identified above).
Although the notice included the text of
paragraphs 58.10 (b)(10) and (b)(11)
(which contain the second and third
requirements identified above), EPA
inadvertently failed to specify that these
paragraphs were also being added to the
existing regulatory text in the
amendatory language.
Need for Correction
As published, the regulatory text in
the final regulation contains a minor
error that, if not corrected, would result
in an error in the publication of the
regulatory amendment in the Code of
Federal Regulations. This action merely
addresses an error in describing how the
CFR regulatory text is amended, and not
the amended regulatory text itself. Thus
it is proper to issue this action with out
notice and comment. Section 553 of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B), provides that, when an
Agency for good cause finds that notice
and public procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest, the Agency may issue a rule
without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. We
have determined that there is good
cause for making this action final
without prior proposal and opportunity
for comment because the change to the
rule is a minor technical correction, is
non-controversial, and does not
substantively change the agency actions
taken in the final rule. We similarly
have determined there is good cause for
making this rule effective January 12,
2009, because that is the same day the
revisions to the Pb NAAQS and the
monitoring requirements become
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
effective under the rule published
November 12, 2008.
Corrections of Publication
The EPA issued a final rule on
November 12, 2008 that revised the
NAAQS for Pb and associated
monitoring requirements. Instruction 15
on how the Code of Federal Regulations
is amended inadvertently failed to
identify two paragraphs as amendments
to 40 CFR 58.10. As published in the
November 12, 2008 final rule,
instruction 15 reads as follows:
‘‘15. Section 58.10, is amended by
added paragraph subsections (a)(4) and
adding paragraph (b)(9) to read as
follows:’’
In FR Doc. E8–25654 published
November 12, 2008 (73 FR 66964), make
the following correction. On page
67059, in the center column,
amendatory instruction 15 is corrected
to read as follows:
‘‘15. Section 58.10, is amended by
adding paragraph (a)(4) and adding
paragraphs (b)(9) through (b)(11) to read
as follows:’’
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 58
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: December 12, 2008.
Robert J. Meyers,
Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator,
Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. E8–30199 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
41 CFR Part 102–74
[FMR Amendment 2008-08; FMR Case 2008–
102–3; Docket 2008–0001; Sequence 5]
RIN 3090–AI78
Federal Management Regulation; FMR
Case 2008–102–3, Real Property
Policies Update – Smoking
Restrictions
AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide
Policy, General Services Administration
(GSA).
ACTION: Final rule.
E:\FR\FM\19DER1.SGM
19DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 245 (Friday, December 19, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 77512-77517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-30169]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3020
[Docket Nos. MC2009-8 and CP2009-9; Order No. 147]
Administrative Practice and Procedure, Postal Service
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is adding a new international mail product to
the Competitive Product List. This product is a contract between the
United States Postal Service and Canada Post for inbound competitive
services. It modifies and extends an existing agreement. The
Commission's action is consistent with changes to applicable federal
law and regulations and with a recent Postal Service request.
Republication of the lists of market dominant and competitive products
is also consistent with requirements in the law.
DATES: Effective December 19, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at https://www.prc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202-789-6820 and stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulatory History, 73 FR 70681 (November
21, 2008).
The Postal Service seeks to add a new product identified as Canada
Post-United States Postal Service Contractual Bilateral Agreement for
Inbound Competitive Services (MC2009-8 and CP2009-9) to the Competitive
Product List. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission approves
the Request.
I. Background
On November 13, 2008, the Postal Service filed a formal request
pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq. to add the Canada
Post-United States Postal Service Contractual Bilateral Agreement for
Inbound Competitive Services (Bilateral Agreement) to the Competitive
Product List.\1\ The Postal Service asserts that the Contractual
Bilateral Agreement is a competitive product ``not of general
applicability'' within the meaning of 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). This
Request has been assigned Docket No. MC2009-8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Request of United States Postal Service to Add Canada Post-
United States Postal Service Contractual Bilateral Agreement for
Inbound Competitive Services to the Competitive Product List, and
Notice of Filing (Under Seal) the Enabling Governors' Decision and
Agreement, November 13, 2008 (Request).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Postal Service contemporaneously filed notice, pursuant to 39
U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39 CFR 3015.5, that the Governors have
established prices and classifications not of general applicability for
inbound competitive services as reflected in the Bilateral Agreement.
More specifically, the Bilateral Agreement, which has been assigned
Docket No. CP2009-9, governs the exchange of Inbound Surface Parcel
Post from Canada.
In support of its Request, the Postal Service filed a redacted
version of the Governors' Decision establishing prices for the
Bilateral Agreement. Attached to the Governors' Decision are proposed
Mail Classification Schedule language; a redacted version of
management's analysis of the Bilateral Agreement; certification of
compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a); certification of the Governors'
vote; \2\ and a Statement of Supporting Justification as required by 39
CFR 3020.32.\3\ In addition, the Postal
[[Page 77513]]
Service indicates that it filed an unredacted copy of the Governors'
Decision, the Bilateral Agreement, and other supporting documents
designed to establish compliance with 39 CFR 3015.5 under seal. Request
at 2, n.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Attachment 1 to the Request.
\3\ See Attachment 2 to the Request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Statement of Supporting Justification, Lea Emerson,
Executive Director, International Postal Affairs, asserts that ``[t]he
addition of the [Bilateral] Agreement as a competitive product will
enable the Commission to verify that the agreement covers its
attributable costs and enables competitive products, as a whole, to
make a positive contribution to coverage of institutional costs.'' Id.
at 2. W. Ashley Lyons, Manager, Corporate Financial Planning, Finance
Department, certifies that the contract complies with 39 U.S.C.
3633(a). Request, Attachment C. He observes that the Bilateral
Agreement ``should not impair the ability of competitive products on
the whole to cover an appropriate share of institutional costs.''Id.
The Postal Service filed much of the supporting materials,
including the Governors' Decision and the Bilateral Agreement, under
seal. It maintains that the Bilateral Agreement, related financial
information, and the Governor's Decision should remain under seal as
they contain pricing, cost, and other information that are highly
confidential. Request at 2.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Postal Service indicates that the materials filed under
seal constitute a subset of the overarching agreement between the
parties, representing the parties' agreement concerning inbound
competitive services. The Postal Service further indicates that the
parties anticipate finalizing ``this and related agreements by mid-
December, and any lingering details will not affect the rates,
classification, or other fundamental basis for this Request and
Notice.'' Request at 5, n.12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Postal Service has an existing bilateral agreement with Canada
Post which is set to expire December 31, 2008. Id. at 3. The new prices
and classifications modify the current agreement, extend it for 1 year,
and are scheduled to take effect January 1, 2009, or ``after filing
with and review by the Postal Regulatory Commission, whichever, is
later.'' Request, Attachment 1, at 2.
In Order No. 134, the Commission gave notice of the two dockets,
appointed a public representative, and provided the public with an
opportunity to comment.\5\ Pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.6, Chairman's
Information Request No.1 was issued November 24, 2008. The Postal
Service filed its response on December 1, 2008 as requested.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ PRC Order No. 134, Notice and Order Concerning Bilateral
Agreement with Canada Post For Inbound Competitive Services,
November 18, 2008 (Order No. 134).
\6\ Response of United States Postal Service to Chairman's
Information Request No. 1 and Notice of Filing of Responsive
Materials (Under Seal) December 1, 2008 (Response).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Comments
Comments were filed by the Public Representative.\7\ No filings
were submitted by other interested parties. The Public Representative's
comments focus principally on confidentiality and pricing under the
contract. Public Representative Comments at 3-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Public Representative Comments in Response to United States
Postal Service Request to add Canada Post-United States Postal
Service Contractual Bilateral Agreement for Inbound Competitive
Services, to the Competitive Product List, and Notice of Filing
(Under Seal) the Enabling Governors' Decision and Agreement,
December 3, 2008 (Public Representative Comments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Public Representative states that a sufficient rationale for
maintaining the confidentiality of the documents under seal has been
provided by the Postal Service. He reviewed the cost savings measures
for the contract and determined that the contract is advantageous to
the Postal Service and beneficial to the general public. Id. He notes
that the Commission's 2007 Annual Compliance Determination (ACD) found
that Inbound Surface Parcel Post under the bilateral agreement with
Canada incurred a loss and the Postal Service is attempting to remedy
this issue with this agreement.\8\ Additionally, he observes that the
pay-for-performance standards will improve the performance of both
postal administrations. He concludes, inter alia, that the contract
appears to meet each element of 39 U.S.C. 3633(a). Id. at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ In the ACD summary of International Mail, issued March 27,
2008, the Commission concludes that revenue for competitive Inbound
Surface Parcel Post (at non-UPU rates) did not cover its
corresponding attributable costs by a relatively small amount.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Commission Analysis
The Commission has reviewed the contract, the financial analysis
provided under seal that accompanies it, the additional information
filed by the Postal Service in response to the Chairman's Information
Request, and the comments filed by the Public Representative.
Statutory requirements. The Commission's statutory responsibilities
in this instance entail assigning the Bilateral Agreement with Canada
Post for Inbound Competitive Services to either the Market Dominant
Product List or to the Competitive Product List. 39 U.S.C. 3642. As
part of this responsibility, the Commission also reviews the proposal
for compliance with the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act
(PAEA) requirements. This includes, for proposed competitive products,
a review of the provisions applicable to rates for competitive
products. 39 U.S.C. 3633.
Product list assignment. In determining whether to assign the
Bilateral Agreement with Canada Post for Inbound Competitive Services
as a product to the Market Dominant Product List or the Competitive
Product List, the Commission must consider whether
the Postal Service exercises sufficient market power that it can
effectively set the price of such product substantially above costs,
raise prices significantly, decrease quality, or decrease output,
without risk of losing a significant level of business to other
firms offering similar products.
39 U.S.C. 3642(b)(1). If so, the product will be categorized as market
dominant. The competitive category of products shall consist of all
other products.
The Commission is further required to consider the availability and
nature of enterprises in the private sector engaged in the delivery of
the product, the views of those who use the product and the likely
impact on small business concerns. 39 U.S.C. 3642(b)(3).
In Docket No. RM2007-1, Order No. 43, the Commission determined
that Inbound Surface Parcel Post shipments tendered at negotiated rates
are appropriately classified as competitive. The Canada Post Bilateral
Agreement falls within this category.
The Postal Service asserts that its bargaining position is
constrained by the existence of other shippers who can provide similar
services, thus precluding it from taking unilateral action to increase
prices without the risk of losing volume to private companies. Request,
Attachment 2, at 2-3. The Postal Service also contends that it may not
decrease quality or output without risking the loss of business to
competitors that offer similar expedited delivery services. Id.
Finally, the Postal Service states that the market for international
parcel delivery services is highly competitive and that the agreement
provides a benefit to Canada Post's and the Postal Service's small
business customers by providing an additional option for shipping
articles between the United States and Canada. It concludes that there
should be little, if any negative impact on small business. Id. at 4.
No commenter opposes the proposed classification of the Canada
Post-United States Postal Service Contractual Bilateral Agreement for
Inbound Competitive Services, as competitive.
[[Page 77514]]
Having considered the statutory requirements and the support offered by
the Postal Service, the Commission finds that the Canada Post-United
Postal Service Contractual Bilateral Agreement for Inbound Competitive
Services is appropriately classified as a competitive product and
should be added to the Competitive Product List.
Cost considerations. The Postal Service's filing seeks to establish
a new product for Inbound Surface Parcel Post from Canada. The Postal
Service asserts the rates provide financial benefits for inbound
competitive services which are better than those that would exist if
the rates used are set by the Universal Postal Union (UPU) treaty.
Request, Attachment 1B, at 1.
The Postal Service contends, as mentioned in the comments of the
Public Representative, adding the Canada Post-United States Postal
Service Contractual Bilateral Agreement for Inbound Competitive
Services product will result in better cost coverage for Inbound
Surface Parcel Post and address the Commission's concern about cost
coverage as expressed in the Annual Compliance Determination for Fiscal
Year 2007. The Commission's summary and findings for International Mail
concluded that revenues for corresponding competitive Inbound Surface
Parcel Post at non-UPU rates did not provide revenues that covered
attributable costs. The Postal Service states that its financial
analysis of the new prices negotiated in this agreement shows that this
contract covers its attributable costs, and does not result in
subsidization of competitive products by market dominant products and
should not impair the ability of competitive products on the whole to
cover an appropriate share of institutional costs. Id., Attachment 1C,
at 1.
Based on the data submitted and the comments received, the
Commission finds that Canada Post-United States Postal Service
Contractual Bilateral Agreement for Inbound Competitive Services should
cover its attributable costs (39 U.S.C. 3633(a)(2)), should not lead to
the subsidization of competitive products by market dominant products
(39 U.S.C. 3633(a)(1)), and should have a positive effect on
competitive products' contribution to institutional costs (39 U.S.C.
3633(a)(3)). Thus, an initial review of the proposed Canada Post-United
States Postal Service Contractual Bilateral Agreement for Inbound
Competitive Services indicates that it comports with the provisions
applicable to rates for competitive products.
It is our understanding that this contract extension will terminate
December 31, 2009. If this is not the case, the Postal Service shall
promptly notify the Commission when the contract terminates, but no
later than the actual termination date. The Commission will then remove
the contract from the Mail Classification Schedule at the earliest
possible opportunity.
In conclusion, the Commission approves the Canada Post-United
States Postal Service Contractual Bilateral Agreement for Inbound
Competitive Services as a new product. The revision to the Competitive
Product List is shown below the signature of this Order and is
effective upon issuance of this Order.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is Ordered:
1. Canada Post-United States Postal Service Contractual Bilateral
Agreement for Inbound Competitive Services (MC2009-8 and CP2009-9) is
added to the Competitive Product List as a new product under
International Inbound Surface Parcel Post (at non-UPU) rates.
2. The Secretary shall arrange for the publication of this Order in
the Federal Register.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 3020
Administrative practice and procedure, Postal Service.
By the Commission.
Steven W. Williams,
Secretary.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, under the authority at 39
U.S.C. 503, the Postal Regulatory Commission amends 39 CFR part 3020 as
follows:
PART 3020--PRODUCT LISTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 3020 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 39 U.S.C. 503; 3622; 3631; 3642; 3682.
0
2. Revise Appendix A to subpart A of part 3020--Mail Classification to
read as follows:
Appendix A to Subpart A of Subpart A of Part 3020--Mail Classification
Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part A--Market Dominant Products
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1000 Market Dominant Product List
First-Class Mail
Single-Piece Letters/Postcards
Bulk Letters/Postcards
Flats
Parcels
Outbound Single-Piece First-Class Mail International
Inbound Single-Piece First-Class Mail International
Standard Mail (Regular and Nonprofit)
High Density and Saturation Letters
High Density and Saturation Flats/Parcels
Carrier Route
Letters
Flats
Not Flat-Machinables (NFMs)/Parcels
Periodicals
Within County Periodicals
Outside County Periodicals
Package Services
Single-Piece Parcel Post
Inbound Surface Parcel Post (at UPU rates)
Bound Printed Matter Flats
Bound Printed Matter Parcels
Media Mail/Library Mail
Special Services
[[Page 77515]]
Ancillary Services
International Ancillary Services
Address List Services
Caller Service
Change-of-Address Credit Card Authentication
Confirm
International Reply Coupon Service
International Business Reply Mail Service
Money Orders
Post Office Box Service
Negotiated Service Agreements
HSBC North America Holdings Inc. Negotiated Service Agreement
Bookspan Negotiated Service Agreement
Bank of America Corporation Negotiated Service Agreement
The Bradford Group Negotiated Service Agreement
Market Dominant Product Descriptions
First-Class Mail [Reserved for Class Description]
Single-Piece Letters/Postcards [Reserved for Product Description]
Bulk Letters/Postcards [Reserved for Product Description]
Flats [Reserved for Product Description]
Parcels [Reserved for Product Description]
Outbound Single-Piece First-Class Mail International [Reserved for
Product Description]
Inbound Single-Piece First-Class Mail International [Reserved for
Product Description]
Standard Mail (Regular and Nonprofit) [Reserved for Class Description]
High Density and Saturation Letters [Reserved for Product
Description]
High Density and Saturation Flats/Parcels [Reserved for Product
Description]
Carrier Route [Reserved for Product Description]
Letters [Reserved for Product Description]
Flats [Reserved for Product Description]
Not Flat-Machinables (NFMs)/Parcels [Reserved for Product
Description]
Periodicals [Reserved for Class Description]
Within County Periodicals [Reserved for Product Description]
Outside County Periodicals [Reserved for Product Description]
Package Services [Reserved for Class Description]
Single-Piece Parcel Post [Reserved for Product Description]
Inbound Surface Parcel Post (at UPU rates) [Reserved for Product
Description]
Bound Printed Matter Flats [Reserved for Product Description]
Bound Printed Matter Parcels [Reserved for Product Description]
Media Mail/Library Mail [Reserved for Product Description]
Special Services [Reserved for Class Description]
Ancillary Services [Reserved for Product Description]
Address Correction Service [Reserved for Product Description]
Applications and Mailing Permits [Reserved for Product Description]
Business Reply Mail [Reserved for Product Description]
Bulk Parcel Return Service [Reserved for Product Description]
Certified Mail [Reserved for Product Description]
Certificate of Mailing [Reserved for Product Description]
Collect on Delivery [Reserved for Product Description]
Delivery Confirmation [Reserved for Product Description]
Insurance [Reserved for Product Description]
Merchandise Return Service [Reserved for Product Description]
Parcel Airlift (PAL) [Reserved for Product Description]
Registered Mail [Reserved for Product Description]
Return Receipt [Reserved for Product Description]
Return Receipt for Merchandise [Reserved for Product Description]
Restricted Delivery [Reserved for Product Description]
Shipper-Paid Forwarding [Reserved for Product Description]
Signature Confirmation [Reserved for Product Description]
Special Handling [Reserved for Product Description]
Stamped Envelopes [Reserved for Product Description]
Stamped Cards [Reserved for Product Description]
Premium Stamped Stationery [Reserved for Product Description]
Premium Stamped Cards [Reserved for Product Description]
International Ancillary Services [Reserved for Product Description]
International Certificate of Mailing [Reserved for Product
Description]
International Registered Mail [Reserved for Product Description]
International Return Receipt [Reserved for Product Description]
International Restricted Delivery [Reserved for Product Description]
Address List Services [Reserved for Product Description]
Caller Service [Reserved for Product Description]
Change-of-Address Credit Card Authentication [Reserved for Product
Description]
Confirm [Reserved for Product Description]
International Reply Coupon Service [Reserved for Product
Description]
International Business Reply Mail Service [Reserved for Product
Description]
[[Page 77516]]
Money Orders [Reserved for Product Description]
Post Office Box Service [Reserved for Product Description]
Negotiated Service Agreements [Reserved for Class Description]
HSBC North America Holdings Inc. Negotiated Service Agreement
[Reserved for Product Description]
Bookspan Negotiated Service Agreement [Reserved for Product
Description]
Bank of America Corporation Negotiated Service Agreement
The Bradford Group Negotiated Service Agreement
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part B--Competitive Products
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Competitive Product List
Express Mail
Express Mail
Outbound International Expedited Services
Inbound International Expedited Services
Inbound International Expedited Services 1 (CP2008-7)
Priority Mail
Priority Mail
Outbound Priority Mail International
Inbound Air Parcel Post
Parcel Select
Parcel Return Service
International
International Priority Airlift (IPA)
International Surface Airlift (ISAL)
International Direct Sacks--M-Bags
Global Customized Shipping Services
Inbound Surface Parcel Post (at non-UPU rates)
Canada Post--United States Postal Service Contractual Bilateral
Agreement for Inbound Competitive Services (MC2009-8 and CP2009-
9)
International Money Transfer Service
International Ancillary Services
Special Services
Premium Forwarding Service
Negotiated Service Agreements
Domestic
Express Mail Contract 1 (MC2008-5)
Express Mail Contract 2 (MC2009-3 and CP2009-4)
Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 1 (MC2009-6 and CP2009-7)
Parcel Return Service Contract 1 (MC2009-1 and CP2009-2)
Priority Mail Contract 1 (MC2008-8 and CP2008-26)
Priority Mail Contract 2 (MC2009-2 and CP2009-3)
Priority Mail Contract 3 (MC2009-4 and CP2009-5)
Priority Mail Contract 4 (MC2009-5 and CP2009-6)
Outbound International
Global Expedited Package Services (GEPS) Contracts
GEPS 1 (CP2008-5, CP2008-11, CP2008-12, and CP2008-13,
CP2008-18, CP2008-19, CP2008-20, CP2008-21, CP2008-22,
CP2008-23, and CP2008-24)
Global Plus Contracts
Global Plus 1 (CP2008-9 and CP2008-10)
Global Plus 2 (MC2008-7, CP2008-16 and CP2008-17)
Inbound Direct Entry Contracts with Foreign Postal Administrations
(MC2008-6, CP2008-14 and CP2008-15)
Competitive Product Descriptions
Express Mail [Reserved for Group Description]
Express Mail [Reserved for Product Description]
Outbound International Expedited Services [Reserved for Product
Description]
Inbound International Expedited Services [Reserved for Product
Description]
Priority [Reserved for Product Description]
Priority Mail [Reserved for Product Description]
Outbound Priority Mail International [Reserved for Product
Description]
Inbound Air Parcel Post [Reserved for Product Description]
Parcel Select [Reserved for Group Description]
Parcel Return Service [Reserved for Group Description]
International [Reserved for Group Description]
International Priority Airlift (IPA) [Reserved for Product
Description]
International Surface Airlift (ISAL) [Reserved for Product
Description]
International Direct Sacks--M-Bags [Reserved for Product
Description]
Global Customized Shipping Services [Reserved for Product
Description]
International Money Transfer Service [Reserved for Product
Description]
Inbound Surface Parcel Post (at non-UPU rates) [Reserved for Product
Description]
International Ancillary Services [Reserved for Product Description]
International Certificate of Mailing [Reserved for Product
Description]
International Registered Mail [Reserved for Product Description]
International Return Receipt [Reserved for Product Description]
[[Page 77517]]
International Restricted Delivery [Reserved for Product Description]
International Insurance [Reserved for Product Description]
Negotiated Service Agreements [Reserved for Group Description]
Domestic [Reserved for Product Description]
Outbound International [Reserved for Group Description]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. E8-30169 Filed 12-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P