Six Rivers National Forest, California, Lower Trinity and Mad River Travel Management EIS, 77601-77605 [E8-30047]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Notices
reviewer’s ability to participate in
subsequent administrative appeal or
judicial review.
HFRA Process
During October and November, 2008
the STNF sent out letters and notices
requesting collaboration and inviting
the public, federal, state and local
agencies, tribes and non governmental
organizations to participate in an HFRA
meeting for the Proposed Action. The
HFRA meeting was held November 12,
2008 at the Community Center in
Lewiston, CA. The notice for the
meeting was published in The Trinity
Journal, Weaverville’s weekly local
newspaper and The Record Searchlight,
the newspaper of record, located in
Redding, CA. The notices were
published in both papers on October
21st and November 2008. Comments
and suggestions provided by persons at
the meeting and submitted by persons
who were unable to attend the meeting
were used, in part, to design the
Proposed Action. The project is
consistent with the HFRA 2003, which
contains provisions to expedite
hazardous fuels reduction and forest
restoration projects on federal lands that
are at risk to wildland fire or insect and
disease epidemics. Projects authorized
under HFRA are defined under Section
102(a)(5)(B) of the act and are designed
to actively involve the public in
reducing the risk of catastrophic fire to
communities and protecting threatened
and endangered species habitat.
A USDA Forest Service
interdisciplinary team designed a
preliminary proposed action. Further
collaborative efforts in conjunction with
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) processes may result in further
modifications to this proposed action. If
significant issues are raised that cannot
be addressed by modifying the proposed
action, the Forest may develop other
action alternatives.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft
environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment
period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from
the date the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes the notice of
availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final
environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the 45
day comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
Dated: December 11, 2008.
J. Sharon Heywood,
Forest Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National
Forest.
[FR Doc. E8–30053 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Six Rivers National Forest, California,
Lower Trinity and Mad River Travel
Management EIS
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of Intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Six Rivers National
Forest (Six Rivers NF) will prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement to
disclose the impacts associated with the
following proposed actions:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77601
1. The prohibition of cross-country
motor vehicle travel (with the exception
of snowmobiles) off designated National
Forest NFTS (NFTS) roads and trails by
the public except as allowed by permit
or other authorization.
2. Make a non-significant amendment
to the Six Rivers NF Land and Resource
Management Plan (Six Rivers Forest
Plan) to conform with the Travel
Management Rule (36 CFR Part 212
Subpart B).
3. Add approximately 58 miles (206
segments) of existing unauthorized
routes to the NFTS as motorized trails
open to the public for motor vehicle use
by vehicle class and season of use.
4. Approximately 7 miles (5 segments)
of existing NFTS roads are proposed for
dual management as both a
Maintenance level 1 (closed) road and
as a motorized trail open to vehicles 50″
or less in width.
5. Make the following change to NFTS
roads: Allow both highway licensed
vehicles and non-highway licensed
vehicles to use approximately 251⁄2
miles (17 segments) of existing NFTS
roads currently open to highway
licensed vehicles only.
6. Make the following changes to
NFTS trails:
a. Allow motor vehicles 50 inches or
less in width on approximately 4 miles
(1 segment) of existing NFTS trail
currently open to motorcycles.
b. Convert approximately 6 miles (2
segments) of existing NFTS motorized
trails to NFTS non-motorized trails.
DATES: The comment period on the
proposed action will extend 45 days
from the date the Notice of Intent is
published in the Federal Register.
Completion of the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (draft EIS) is expected
in spring 2009 and the Final
Environmental Impact Statement (final
EIS) is expected in summer 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to:
Travel Management Team, Six Rivers
National Forest, 1330 Bayshore Way,
Eureka, CA 95501. Electronic
comments, in acceptable plain text
(.txt), rich text (.rtf), or Word (.doc) may
be submitted to commentspacificsouthwest-six-rivers@fs.fed.us.
Please insure that ‘‘Travel Management’’
occurs in the subject line.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leslie Burkhart, Six Rivers National
Forest, 1330 Bayshore Way, Eureka, CA
95501. Phone: 707–441–3520. E-mail:
comments-pacificsouthwest-sixrivers@fs.fed.us with ‘‘Travel
Management’’ in the subject line.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
77602
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Notices
Background
Over the past few decades, the
availability and capability of motor
vehicles, particularly off-highway
vehicles (OHVs) and sport utility
vehicles (SUVs) has increased
tremendously. Nationally, the number
of OHV users has climbed sevenfold in
the past 30 years, from approximately 5
million in 1972 to 36 million in 2000.
The ten states with the largest
population also have the most OHV
users. California has 4.35 million OHV
users accounting for almost 11% of the
U.S. total (Off-Highway Vehicle
Recreation in the United States, Regions
and States: A National Report from the
National Survey on Recreation and the
Environment (NSRE) Cordell, Betz,
Green and Owens June 2005). There
were 786,914 all terrain vehicles (ATVs)
and OHV motorcycles registered in
2004, up 330% since 1980. Annual sales
of ATVs and OHV motorcycles in
California were the highest in the U.S.
for the last 5 years. Four-wheel drive
vehicle sales in California also increased
by 1500% to 3,046,866 from 1989 to
2002.
Unmanaged OHV use has resulted in
unplanned roads and trails, erosion,
watershed and habitat degradation, and
impacts to cultural resource sites.
Compaction and erosion are the primary
effects of OHV use on soils. Riparian
areas and aquatic dependent species are
particularly vulnerable to OHV use.
Unmanaged recreation, including
impacts from OHVs, is one of ‘‘Four Key
Threats Facing the Nation’s Forests and
Grasslands.’’ (USDA Forest Service,
June 2004).
On August 11, 2003, the Pacific
Southwest Region of the Forest Service
entered into a Memorandum of Intent
(MOI) with the California Off-Highway
Motor Vehicle Recreation Commission,
and the Off-Highway Motor Vehicle
Recreation Division of the California
Department of Parks and Recreation.
That MOI set in motion a region-wide
effort to ‘‘Designate OHV roads, trails,
and any specifically defined open areas
for motor vehicles on maps of the 19
National Forests in California by 2007.’’
On November 9, 2005, the Forest
Service published final travel
management regulations in the Federal
Register (FR Vol. 70, No. 216–Nov. 9,
2005, pp 68264–68291). Subpart B of
the final Travel Management Rule
requires designation of those roads,
trails, and areas that are open to motor
vehicle use on National Forests. Route
designations will be made by class of
vehicle and, if appropriate, by time of
year. The final rule allows for motor
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
vehicle use only on designated system
routes and in designated areas.
On some National Forest System
lands, long managed as open to crosscountry motor vehicle travel, repeated
use has resulted in unplanned,
unauthorized, roads and trails. These
routes generally developed without
environmental analysis or public
involvement, and do not have the same
status as National Forest System roads
and National Forest System trails
included in the NFTS. Nevertheless,
some unauthorized routes are wellsited, provide excellent opportunities
for outdoor recreation by motorized and
non-motorized users, and would
enhance the National Forest System of
designated roads, trails and areas. Other
unauthorized routes are poorly located
and cause unacceptable impacts. Only
NFTS roads and NFTS trails can be
designated for motor vehicle use. In
order for an unauthorized route to be
designated, it must first be added to the
NFTS.
In accordance with the MOI, the Six
Rivers NF completed an inventory of
unauthorized routes on National Forest
System lands and identified over 250
miles of unauthorized routes. The Six
Rivers NF then used an
interdisciplinary process to evaluate the
routes that included working with the
public to determine whether any of the
unauthorized routes should be proposed
for addition to the Six Rivers NFTS in
this proposed action. The route
evaluation identified a number of routes
which could be considered in this or
future decisions on the NFTS as a part
of travel management on the Lower
Trinity and Mad River Ranger Districts
of the Six Rivers National Forest. Roads
and trails (there are no areas) that are
currently part of the Six Rivers NFTS
and are open to motor vehicle travel
will remain designated for such use
except as described below under
Proposed Action. This proposal focuses
only on the prohibition of motor vehicle
travel off designated routes and needed
changes to the Six Rivers NFTS,
including the addition of some
unauthorized routes to the Six Rivers
NFTS and minor changes to the existing
motor vehicle restrictions. The proposed
action is being carried forward in
accordance with the Travel Management
Rule (36 CFR Part 212, Subpart B).
In accordance with the Travel
Management Rule, following a decision
on this proposal, a Motor Vehicle Use
Map (MVUM) will be published for both
the Lower Trinity Ranger District and
Mad River Ranger District of the Six
Rivers NF. These MVUMs will identify
all roads and trails that are designated
for motor vehicle use. The MVUMs shall
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
specify the classes of vehicles and, if
appropriate, the times of year for which
use is designated. Unauthorized routes
not included in this proposal are not
precluded from future consideration for
addition to the NFTS and inclusion in
a MVUM. Future decisions associated
with changes to the MVUMs may trigger
the need for documentation of
environmental analysis.
Purpose and Need for Action
The following needs have been
identified for this proposal:
1. There is a need for regulation of
unmanaged cross-country motor vehicle
travel by the public. The proliferation of
unplanned, unauthorized, nonsustainable roads, trails, and areas
created by cross-country travel
adversely impacts the environment. The
2005 Travel Management Rule, 36 CFR
Section 212, Subpart B, provides for a
system of NFS roads, NFS trails, and
areas on National Forest System lands
that are designated for motor vehicle
use. After roads, trails, and areas are
designated, motor vehicle use off
designated roads and trails and outside
designated areas is prohibited by 36
CFR 261.13. Subpart B is intended to
prevent resource damage caused by
unmanaged motor vehicle use by the
public. In accordance with national
direction, implementation of Subpart B
of the travel management rule for the
Six Rivers National Forest is scheduled
for completion in 2009.
2. There is a need for the Six Rivers
Forest Plan to conform to the Travel
Management Rule, 36 CFR 212, Subpart
B. A review of the Six Rivers Forest Plan
has found that OHV use is restricted to
designated routes but there is no general
prohibition of motor vehicle travel off of
designated roads and trails.
3. There is a need for limited changes
to the Six Rivers NFTS to:
a. Provide motor vehicle access to
dispersed recreation opportunities
(camping, hunting, fishing, hiking,
horseback riding, etc.). A substantial
portion of known dispersed recreation
activities are not typically located
directly adjacent to NFTS roads or
NFTS motorized trails. Some dispersed
recreation activities depend on foot or
horseback access, and some depend on
motor vehicle access. Those activities
accessed by motor vehicles are typically
accessed by short spurs that have been
created primarily by the passage of
motor vehicles. Many such
unauthorized ‘‘user-created’’ routes are
not currently part of the NFTS. Without
adding them to the NFTS and
designating them on a MVUM, the
regulatory changes noted above would
make continued use of such routes
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
77603
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Notices
illegal and would preclude access by the
public to many dispersed recreation
activities.
b. Provide a diversity of motorized
recreation opportunities (4x4 vehicles,
motorcycles, ATVs, SUVs, passenger
vehicles, etc.). It is Forest Service policy
to provide a diversity of road and trail
opportunities for experiencing a variety
of environments and modes of travel
consistent with the National Forest
recreation role and land capability (FSM
2353.03(2)). Implementation of Subpart
B of the Travel Management Rule will
severely reduce acres and miles of
motorized recreation opportunities
relative to current levels. As a result,
there is a need to consider limited
changes to the NFTS.
In making any limited changes to the
National Forest Transportation system,
the Six Rivers NF will be considering
criteria contained in Subpart B of the
Travel Management Rule, which
include the following:
A. Impacts to natural and cultural
resources.
B. Public safety.
C. Access to public and private lands.
D. Availability of resources for
maintenance and administration of
roads trails and areas that would arise
if the uses under consideration are
designated.
E. Minimizing damage to soil,
watershed, vegetation, and other forest
resources.
F. Minimizing harassment of wildlife
and significant disruption of wildlife
habitat.
G. Minimizing conflicts between
motor vehicles and existing or proposed
recreational uses of NFS lands or
neighboring federal lands.
H. Minimizing conflicts among
different classes of motor vehicle uses of
NFS lands or neighboring federal lands.
I. Compatibility of motor vehicle use
with existing conditions in populated
areas, taking into account sound,
emissions, and other factors.
When making any limited changes to
National Forest System Roads, the Six
Rivers NF will also consider the
following:
1. Speed, volume, composition and
distribution of traffic on roads.
2. Compatibility of vehicle class with
road geometry and road surfacing
3. Maintaining valid existing rights of
use and access (rights-of-way)
Proposed Action
1. The prohibition of cross-country
motor vehicle travel (with the exception
of snowmobiles) off designated National
Forest NFTS (NFTS) roads, trails, and
areas by the public except as allowed by
permit or other authorization.
2. Make a non-significant amendment
to the Six Rivers Forest Plan to conform
to the Travel Management Rule, Subpart
B. The text of Recreation Standard and
Guideline for Motorized Recreation 18–
21, Six Rivers Forest Plan, p. IV–124,
which currently reads ‘‘OHV use is
restricted to designated routes’’ shall be
replaced in its entirety with the
following text ‘‘Prohibit motor vehicle
travel (with the exception of
snowmobiles) off designated roads,
trails and areas except as allowed by
permit or other authorization.’’
3. Additions to the National Forest
NFTS. The Six Rivers NF currently
manages and maintains approximately
526 miles of NFTS roads and no NFTS
motorized trails on the Lower Trinity
Ranger District; and manages and
maintains approximately 871 miles of
NFTS roads and 36 miles of NFTS
motorized trails on the Mad River
Ranger District. Based on the stated
purpose and need for action and route
evaluation, the Six Rivers National
Forest proposes to add approximately
19 miles (62 segments) of existing
unauthorized routes to its NFTS as
motorized trails on the Lower Trinity
Ranger District; and to add
approximately 39 miles (144 segments)
of existing unauthorized routes to its
NFTS motorized trails on the Mad River
Ranger District open to the public for
motor vehicle use by vehicle class and
season of use. A summary of the
additional NFTS motorized trails are
listed below by Ranger District. Note
that no additional motorcycle trails are
proposed for the NFTS.
NFTS MOTORIZED TRAIL ADDITIONS—LOWER TRINITY RANGER DISTRICT
Trail type
Proposed
addition
(miles)
High Clearance ...............
<=50″ ..............................
5 ..................
14 ................
Motorcycle ......................
none ............
Year-round
(miles)
Permitted vehicle classes
Trails open to high clearance wheeled vehicles ...
Trails open to wheeled vehicles 50 inches or less
in width.
Trails open to vehicles with two in-line wheels .....
Subject to
mitigations
(miles)
Seasonal
(miles)
3
<1
2
14
1
12
N/A
N/A
N/A
NFTS MOTORIZED TRAIL ADDITIONS—MAD RIVER RANGER DISTRICT
Trail type
Proposed
addition
(miles)
High Clearance ...............
<=50″ ..............................
30 ................
9 ..................
Motorcycle ......................
none ............
Trails open to high clearance wheeled vehicles ...
Trails open to wheeled vehicles 50 inches or less
in width.
Trails open to vehicles with two in-line wheels .....
The existing unauthorized routes
proposed as additions to the Six Rivers
NFTS as motorized trails occur across
both Districts within many land
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
Year-round
(miles)
Permitted vehicle classes
allocations and resource emphasis areas;
this includes proposed motorized trails
within Late Successional Reserves,
Inventoried Roadless Areas, and Key
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Subject to
mitigations
(miles)
Seasonal
(miles)
25
8
5
1
14
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
Watersheds as summarized in the
following tables.
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
77604
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Notices
TRAIL ADDITIONS WITHIN AREAS OF INTEREST—LOWER TRINITY RANGER DISTRICT
Management areas of interest
Trail type
Proposed addition
total
(miles)
High Clearance ..............................................
<=50″ .............................................................
Motorcycle .....................................................
5 ................................
14 ..............................
none ..........................
Late successional
reserve
(miles)
Inventoried roadless
areas
(miles)
1.7
2.4
N/A
Key watershed
(miles)
none .............................
none .............................
N/A ...............................
1.9
5.9
N/A
TRAIL ADDITIONS WITHIN AREAS OF INTEREST—MAD RIVER RANGER DISTRICT
Management areas of interest
Trail type
Proposed addition
total
(miles)
High Clearance ..............................................
<=50″ .............................................................
Motorcycle .....................................................
30 ..............................
9 ................................
none ..........................
4. Co-location of Motorized Trail on
NFTS roads closed year-round.
Approximately 7 miles (5 segments) of
existing NFTS roads are proposed for
dual management as both a
Maintenance level 1 (closed) road and
as a motorized trail open to vehicles 50″
or less in width. Approximately 7 miles
(4 segments) would be located on Lower
Trinity Ranger District to expand
motorized recreation opportunity by
linking proposed motorized trails in the
Waterman Ridge and Hennessy Ridge
networks. Approximately 0.2 mile (1
segment) would be located on the Mad
River Ranger District to provide access
to a dispersed camp.
5. Limited Changes to the National
Forest NFTS Roads. The Six Rivers
National Forest proposes the following
changes to NFTS roads to expand
motorized trail opportunities, including
increasing potential loops by using
existing NFTS roads as links or
connections within proposed networks
of motorized trails: Allow both highway
licensed vehicle and non-highway
licensed vehicle use on approximately 8
miles (5 segments) of existing NFTS
roads currently open to highway legal
vehicles only on the Lower Trinity
Ranger District. Allow both highway
licensed vehicle and non-highway
licensed vehicle use on approximately
171⁄2 miles (12 segments) of existing
NFTS roads currently open to highway
legal vehicles only on the Mad River
Ranger District. Of these changes, all but
approximately 21⁄2 miles (1 segment) on
the Mad River Ranger District, are
subject to California Vehicle Code
regulations that include the requirement
of a licensed operator operating the
vehicle.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
Late successional
reserve
(miles)
10.3
2.5
N/A
6. Limited Changes to NFTS Trails.
The Six Rivers National Forest proposes
the following changes to NFTS trails:
Allow wheeled vehicles 50 inches or
less in width on approximately 4 miles
(1 segment) of existing NFTS trail
currently open to motorcycles to
augment the Pilot Creek motorized trail
network on the Mad River Ranger
District. Convert approximately 6 miles
(2 segments) of existing NFTS motorized
trails to NFTS non-motorized trails on
the Mad River Ranger District because of
safety concerns on a segment of Devil’s
Backbone and due to lack of use and
potential adverse resource effects on the
Bradburn Trail.
Maps and tables detailing the
proposed action can be found at
https://www.fs.fed.us/r5/sixrivers/
projects/ohv/. In addition, maps will be
available for viewing at:
• Six Rivers National Forest
Supervisor’s Office, 1330 Bayshore Way,
Eureka, CA 95501; phone: 707–442–
1721.
• Lower Trinity Ranger District,
Highway 96 (2 miles North of Willow
Creek), Willow Creek, CA 95573; phone:
630–629–2118.
• Mad River Ranger District, Highway
36 (28 miles east of Bridgeville),
Bridgeville, CA 95526; phone: 707–574–
6233.
Responsible Official
Tyrone Kelley, Forest Supervisor, Six
Rivers National Forest, 1330 Bayshore
Way, Eureka, CA 95501
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The responsible official will decide
whether to adopt and implement the
proposed action, an alternative to the
proposed action, or take no action to
make changes to existing prohibitions
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Inventoried roadless
areas
(miles)
1.9 ................................
1.3 ................................
N/A ...............................
Key watershed
(miles)
2.4
1.3
N/A
and allowances for public motor vehicle
travel within the existing Six Rivers NF
NFTS and prohibit cross country motor
vehicle travel by the public off the
designated system. Once the decision is
made, the Six Rivers NF will publish
two Motor Vehicle Use Maps (MVUM)
identifying the roads and trails that are
designated for motor vehicle use. The
MVUMs shall specify the classes of
vehicles and, if appropriate, the time of
year for which use is designated. Future
decisions associated with changes to the
MVUMs may trigger the need for
documentation of environmental
analysis.
This proposal does not revisit
previous administrative decisions that
resulted in the current NFTS. This
proposal is focused on implementing
Subpart B of the Travel Management
Rule. Previous administrative decisions
concerning road construction, road
reconstruction, trail construction, and
land suitability for motorized use on the
existing NFTS are outside of the scope
of this proposal.
Scoping Process
Public participation will be especially
important at several points during the
analysis. The Forest Service will be
seeking information, comments, and
assistance from federal, state, and local
agencies and other individuals or
organizations who may be interested in
or affected by the proposed action.
The Six Rivers NF has been meeting
with local elected officials, Tribes, and
community groups, including service
and professional organizations, to
discuss the Travel Management Rule
and travel management on the Lower
Trinity and Mad River Ranger Districts
since 2005. In May and June of 2005,
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Notices
public workshops were held in Eureka,
Willow Creek, and Mad River, CA to
inform the public about the Travel
Management Rule. In October 2007 and
April, May, and June 2008, public
workshops were held in those same
locations to gather information from the
public about which routes they use and
their concerns. Additionally, maps of
inventoried routes were available on the
Forest’s Web site and Forest Service
offices. The public used these maps to
provide input into the process.
The comment period on the proposed
action will extend 45 days from the date
this Notice of Intent is published in the
Federal Register.
The draft environmental impact
statement is expected to be filed with
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) and to be available for public
review by spring 2009. EPA will publish
a notice of availability of the draft EIS
in the Federal Register. The comment
period on the draft EIS will extend 45
days from the date the EPA notice
appears in the Federal Register. At that
time, copies of the draft EIS will be
distributed to interested and affected
agencies, organizations, and members of
the public for their review and
comment. It is very important that those
interested in the management of the Six
Rivers NF participate at that time.
The final EIS is scheduled to be
completed in summer 2009. In the final
EIS, the Forest Service will respond to
comments received during the comment
period that are: within the scope of the
proposed action; specific to the
proposed action; have a direct
relationship with the proposed action;
and include supporting reasons for the
responsible official to consider.
Submission of comments to the draft
EIS is a prerequisite for eligibility to
appeal under the 36 CFR part 215
regulations.
Comment Requested
This Notice of Intent initiates the
scoping process which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft EIS will
be prepared for comment. The comment
period on the draft EIS will be 45 days
from the date the EPA publishes the
notice of availability in the Federal
Register.
At this early stage, it is important to
give reviewers notice of several court
rulings related to public participation in
the environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft EISs must structure
their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft EIS stage but that are
not raised until after completion of the
final EIS may be waived or dismissed by
the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803
F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and
Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980).
Because of these court rulings, it is very
important that those interested in this
proposed action participate by the close
of the 45 day comment period so that
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft EIS should be as
specific as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft EIS. Comments
may also address the adequacy of the
draft EIS or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the
statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
Dated: December 12, 2008.
Tyrone Kelley,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E8–30047 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Superior National Forest Federal
Hardrock Mineral Prospecting Permits
Project.
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This analysis would address
federal hardrock mineral exploration in
terms of 32 current permit applications,
future permit applications, current and
future operating plans, and future use
and occupancy authorizations (Special
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77605
Use Permits) on the Superior National
Forest (SNF) over the next 20 years. The
project area covers all SNF managed
lands available to mineral exploration.
In accordance with the SNF Land and
Resource Mangement Plan, the
Boundary Waters Canoe Area
Wilderness, Mining Protection Area,
and Eligible Wild River Segments are
not available to mineral exploration.
The Forest Service is the lead agency for
this EIS and the United States
Department of the Interior (USDI),
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is a
cooperating agency. As a cooperating
agency, the BLM will adopt the EIS to
support their own Record of Decision.
Federal laws and policies will be
outlined in the EIS that will require the
SNF, as the agency managing the
surface, and the BLM, as the agency
responsible for managing sub-surface
minerals resources, to consider the
Prospecting Permit applications. Based
on the Forest Service’s
recommendations and consent, the BLM
will review those recommendations and
decide whether to authorize the
prospecting permits and operating
plans.
DATES: Scoping for this project is
planned for January 2009. When the
scoping package is completed, it will be
sent out for public review and comment.
At that time, it will also be available for
review, along with supplemental large
scale maps, on the Internet at the
following Web site: https://
www.fs.fed.us/r9/forests/superior/
projects/. The draft environmental
impact statement is expected February
2010 and the final environmental
impact statement is expected June 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
James W. Sanders, Forest Supervisor,
8901 Grand Avenue Place, Duluth, MN
55808.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you would like additional information
or have questions regarding this action,
contact Patty Beyer, Project Coordinator
at 906–226–1499 or Michael Jimenez,
Forest Planner at 218–626–4383.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose and need for this project
is three-fold.
First: Analyze the effects to the
environment from 32 permit
applications and any future prospecting
permit applications for hardrock
mineral prospecting, and, determine: (a)
If the lands requested under the 32
permit applications are available for
mineral prospecting and what lands are
available for future prospecting permit
applications; (b) If activities carried out
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 245 (Friday, December 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77601-77605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-30047]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Six Rivers National Forest, California, Lower Trinity and Mad
River Travel Management EIS
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Six Rivers National Forest (Six Rivers NF) will prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement to disclose the impacts associated with
the following proposed actions:
1. The prohibition of cross-country motor vehicle travel (with the
exception of snowmobiles) off designated National Forest NFTS (NFTS)
roads and trails by the public except as allowed by permit or other
authorization.
2. Make a non-significant amendment to the Six Rivers NF Land and
Resource Management Plan (Six Rivers Forest Plan) to conform with the
Travel Management Rule (36 CFR Part 212 Subpart B).
3. Add approximately 58 miles (206 segments) of existing
unauthorized routes to the NFTS as motorized trails open to the public
for motor vehicle use by vehicle class and season of use.
4. Approximately 7 miles (5 segments) of existing NFTS roads are
proposed for dual management as both a Maintenance level 1 (closed)
road and as a motorized trail open to vehicles 50'' or less in width.
5. Make the following change to NFTS roads: Allow both highway
licensed vehicles and non-highway licensed vehicles to use
approximately 25\1/2\ miles (17 segments) of existing NFTS roads
currently open to highway licensed vehicles only.
6. Make the following changes to NFTS trails:
a. Allow motor vehicles 50 inches or less in width on approximately
4 miles (1 segment) of existing NFTS trail currently open to
motorcycles.
b. Convert approximately 6 miles (2 segments) of existing NFTS
motorized trails to NFTS non-motorized trails.
DATES: The comment period on the proposed action will extend 45 days
from the date the Notice of Intent is published in the Federal
Register. Completion of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (draft
EIS) is expected in spring 2009 and the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (final EIS) is expected in summer 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to: Travel Management Team, Six Rivers
National Forest, 1330 Bayshore Way, Eureka, CA 95501. Electronic
comments, in acceptable plain text (.txt), rich text (.rtf), or Word
(.doc) may be submitted to comments-pacificsouthwest-six-
rivers@fs.fed.us. Please insure that ``Travel Management'' occurs in
the subject line.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie Burkhart, Six Rivers National
Forest, 1330 Bayshore Way, Eureka, CA 95501. Phone: 707-441-3520. E-
mail: comments-pacificsouthwest-six-rivers@fs.fed.us with ``Travel
Management'' in the subject line.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 77602]]
Background
Over the past few decades, the availability and capability of motor
vehicles, particularly off-highway vehicles (OHVs) and sport utility
vehicles (SUVs) has increased tremendously. Nationally, the number of
OHV users has climbed sevenfold in the past 30 years, from
approximately 5 million in 1972 to 36 million in 2000. The ten states
with the largest population also have the most OHV users. California
has 4.35 million OHV users accounting for almost 11% of the U.S. total
(Off-Highway Vehicle Recreation in the United States, Regions and
States: A National Report from the National Survey on Recreation and
the Environment (NSRE) Cordell, Betz, Green and Owens June 2005). There
were 786,914 all terrain vehicles (ATVs) and OHV motorcycles registered
in 2004, up 330% since 1980. Annual sales of ATVs and OHV motorcycles
in California were the highest in the U.S. for the last 5 years. Four-
wheel drive vehicle sales in California also increased by 1500% to
3,046,866 from 1989 to 2002.
Unmanaged OHV use has resulted in unplanned roads and trails,
erosion, watershed and habitat degradation, and impacts to cultural
resource sites. Compaction and erosion are the primary effects of OHV
use on soils. Riparian areas and aquatic dependent species are
particularly vulnerable to OHV use. Unmanaged recreation, including
impacts from OHVs, is one of ``Four Key Threats Facing the Nation's
Forests and Grasslands.'' (USDA Forest Service, June 2004).
On August 11, 2003, the Pacific Southwest Region of the Forest
Service entered into a Memorandum of Intent (MOI) with the California
Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Commission, and the Off-Highway
Motor Vehicle Recreation Division of the California Department of Parks
and Recreation. That MOI set in motion a region-wide effort to
``Designate OHV roads, trails, and any specifically defined open areas
for motor vehicles on maps of the 19 National Forests in California by
2007.'' On November 9, 2005, the Forest Service published final travel
management regulations in the Federal Register (FR Vol. 70, No. 216-
Nov. 9, 2005, pp 68264-68291). Subpart B of the final Travel Management
Rule requires designation of those roads, trails, and areas that are
open to motor vehicle use on National Forests. Route designations will
be made by class of vehicle and, if appropriate, by time of year. The
final rule allows for motor vehicle use only on designated system
routes and in designated areas.
On some National Forest System lands, long managed as open to
cross-country motor vehicle travel, repeated use has resulted in
unplanned, unauthorized, roads and trails. These routes generally
developed without environmental analysis or public involvement, and do
not have the same status as National Forest System roads and National
Forest System trails included in the NFTS. Nevertheless, some
unauthorized routes are well-sited, provide excellent opportunities for
outdoor recreation by motorized and non-motorized users, and would
enhance the National Forest System of designated roads, trails and
areas. Other unauthorized routes are poorly located and cause
unacceptable impacts. Only NFTS roads and NFTS trails can be designated
for motor vehicle use. In order for an unauthorized route to be
designated, it must first be added to the NFTS.
In accordance with the MOI, the Six Rivers NF completed an
inventory of unauthorized routes on National Forest System lands and
identified over 250 miles of unauthorized routes. The Six Rivers NF
then used an interdisciplinary process to evaluate the routes that
included working with the public to determine whether any of the
unauthorized routes should be proposed for addition to the Six Rivers
NFTS in this proposed action. The route evaluation identified a number
of routes which could be considered in this or future decisions on the
NFTS as a part of travel management on the Lower Trinity and Mad River
Ranger Districts of the Six Rivers National Forest. Roads and trails
(there are no areas) that are currently part of the Six Rivers NFTS and
are open to motor vehicle travel will remain designated for such use
except as described below under Proposed Action. This proposal focuses
only on the prohibition of motor vehicle travel off designated routes
and needed changes to the Six Rivers NFTS, including the addition of
some unauthorized routes to the Six Rivers NFTS and minor changes to
the existing motor vehicle restrictions. The proposed action is being
carried forward in accordance with the Travel Management Rule (36 CFR
Part 212, Subpart B).
In accordance with the Travel Management Rule, following a decision
on this proposal, a Motor Vehicle Use Map (MVUM) will be published for
both the Lower Trinity Ranger District and Mad River Ranger District of
the Six Rivers NF. These MVUMs will identify all roads and trails that
are designated for motor vehicle use. The MVUMs shall specify the
classes of vehicles and, if appropriate, the times of year for which
use is designated. Unauthorized routes not included in this proposal
are not precluded from future consideration for addition to the NFTS
and inclusion in a MVUM. Future decisions associated with changes to
the MVUMs may trigger the need for documentation of environmental
analysis.
Purpose and Need for Action
The following needs have been identified for this proposal:
1. There is a need for regulation of unmanaged cross-country motor
vehicle travel by the public. The proliferation of unplanned,
unauthorized, non-sustainable roads, trails, and areas created by
cross-country travel adversely impacts the environment. The 2005 Travel
Management Rule, 36 CFR Section 212, Subpart B, provides for a system
of NFS roads, NFS trails, and areas on National Forest System lands
that are designated for motor vehicle use. After roads, trails, and
areas are designated, motor vehicle use off designated roads and trails
and outside designated areas is prohibited by 36 CFR 261.13. Subpart B
is intended to prevent resource damage caused by unmanaged motor
vehicle use by the public. In accordance with national direction,
implementation of Subpart B of the travel management rule for the Six
Rivers National Forest is scheduled for completion in 2009.
2. There is a need for the Six Rivers Forest Plan to conform to the
Travel Management Rule, 36 CFR 212, Subpart B. A review of the Six
Rivers Forest Plan has found that OHV use is restricted to designated
routes but there is no general prohibition of motor vehicle travel off
of designated roads and trails.
3. There is a need for limited changes to the Six Rivers NFTS to:
a. Provide motor vehicle access to dispersed recreation
opportunities (camping, hunting, fishing, hiking, horseback riding,
etc.). A substantial portion of known dispersed recreation activities
are not typically located directly adjacent to NFTS roads or NFTS
motorized trails. Some dispersed recreation activities depend on foot
or horseback access, and some depend on motor vehicle access. Those
activities accessed by motor vehicles are typically accessed by short
spurs that have been created primarily by the passage of motor
vehicles. Many such unauthorized ``user-created'' routes are not
currently part of the NFTS. Without adding them to the NFTS and
designating them on a MVUM, the regulatory changes noted above would
make continued use of such routes
[[Page 77603]]
illegal and would preclude access by the public to many dispersed
recreation activities.
b. Provide a diversity of motorized recreation opportunities (4x4
vehicles, motorcycles, ATVs, SUVs, passenger vehicles, etc.). It is
Forest Service policy to provide a diversity of road and trail
opportunities for experiencing a variety of environments and modes of
travel consistent with the National Forest recreation role and land
capability (FSM 2353.03(2)). Implementation of Subpart B of the Travel
Management Rule will severely reduce acres and miles of motorized
recreation opportunities relative to current levels. As a result, there
is a need to consider limited changes to the NFTS.
In making any limited changes to the National Forest Transportation
system, the Six Rivers NF will be considering criteria contained in
Subpart B of the Travel Management Rule, which include the following:
A. Impacts to natural and cultural resources.
B. Public safety.
C. Access to public and private lands.
D. Availability of resources for maintenance and administration of
roads trails and areas that would arise if the uses under consideration
are designated.
E. Minimizing damage to soil, watershed, vegetation, and other
forest resources.
F. Minimizing harassment of wildlife and significant disruption of
wildlife habitat.
G. Minimizing conflicts between motor vehicles and existing or
proposed recreational uses of NFS lands or neighboring federal lands.
H. Minimizing conflicts among different classes of motor vehicle
uses of NFS lands or neighboring federal lands.
I. Compatibility of motor vehicle use with existing conditions in
populated areas, taking into account sound, emissions, and other
factors.
When making any limited changes to National Forest System Roads,
the Six Rivers NF will also consider the following:
1. Speed, volume, composition and distribution of traffic on roads.
2. Compatibility of vehicle class with road geometry and road
surfacing
3. Maintaining valid existing rights of use and access (rights-of-
way)
Proposed Action
1. The prohibition of cross-country motor vehicle travel (with the
exception of snowmobiles) off designated National Forest NFTS (NFTS)
roads, trails, and areas by the public except as allowed by permit or
other authorization.
2. Make a non-significant amendment to the Six Rivers Forest Plan
to conform to the Travel Management Rule, Subpart B. The text of
Recreation Standard and Guideline for Motorized Recreation 18-21, Six
Rivers Forest Plan, p. IV-124, which currently reads ``OHV use is
restricted to designated routes'' shall be replaced in its entirety
with the following text ``Prohibit motor vehicle travel (with the
exception of snowmobiles) off designated roads, trails and areas except
as allowed by permit or other authorization.''
3. Additions to the National Forest NFTS. The Six Rivers NF
currently manages and maintains approximately 526 miles of NFTS roads
and no NFTS motorized trails on the Lower Trinity Ranger District; and
manages and maintains approximately 871 miles of NFTS roads and 36
miles of NFTS motorized trails on the Mad River Ranger District. Based
on the stated purpose and need for action and route evaluation, the Six
Rivers National Forest proposes to add approximately 19 miles (62
segments) of existing unauthorized routes to its NFTS as motorized
trails on the Lower Trinity Ranger District; and to add approximately
39 miles (144 segments) of existing unauthorized routes to its NFTS
motorized trails on the Mad River Ranger District open to the public
for motor vehicle use by vehicle class and season of use. A summary of
the additional NFTS motorized trails are listed below by Ranger
District. Note that no additional motorcycle trails are proposed for
the NFTS.
NFTS Motorized Trail Additions--Lower Trinity Ranger District
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject to
Trail type Proposed addition (miles) Permitted vehicle classes Year-round Seasonal mitigations
(miles) (miles) (miles)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
High Clearance.......................... 5........................... Trails open to high clearance 3 2 1
wheeled vehicles.
<=50''.................................. 14.......................... Trails open to wheeled vehicles <1 14 12
50 inches or less in width.
Motorcycle.............................. none........................ Trails open to vehicles with two N/A N/A N/A
in-line wheels.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NFTS Motorized Trail Additions--Mad River Ranger District
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject to
Trail type Proposed addition (miles) Permitted vehicle classes Year-round Seasonal mitigations
(miles) (miles) (miles)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
High Clearance.......................... 30.......................... Trails open to high clearance 25 5 14
wheeled vehicles.
<=50''.................................. 9........................... Trails open to wheeled vehicles 8 1 2
50 inches or less in width.
Motorcycle.............................. none........................ Trails open to vehicles with two N/A N/A N/A
in-line wheels.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The existing unauthorized routes proposed as additions to the Six
Rivers NFTS as motorized trails occur across both Districts within many
land allocations and resource emphasis areas; this includes proposed
motorized trails within Late Successional Reserves, Inventoried
Roadless Areas, and Key Watersheds as summarized in the following
tables.
[[Page 77604]]
Trail Additions Within Areas of Interest--Lower Trinity Ranger District
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Management areas of interest
--------------------------------------------------------------
Trail type Proposed addition Inventoried
total (miles) Late successional roadless areas Key watershed
reserve (miles) (miles) (miles)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
High Clearance................ 5................ 1.7 none............. 1.9
<=50''........................ 14............... 2.4 none............. 5.9
Motorcycle.................... none............. N/A N/A.............. N/A
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trail Additions Within Areas of Interest--Mad River Ranger District
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Management areas of interest
--------------------------------------------------------------
Trail type Proposed addition Inventoried
total (miles) Late successional roadless areas Key watershed
reserve (miles) (miles) (miles)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
High Clearance................ 30............... 10.3 1.9.............. 2.4
<=50''........................ 9................ 2.5 1.3.............. 1.3
Motorcycle.................... none............. N/A N/A.............. N/A
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Co-location of Motorized Trail on NFTS roads closed year-round.
Approximately 7 miles (5 segments) of existing NFTS roads are proposed
for dual management as both a Maintenance level 1 (closed) road and as
a motorized trail open to vehicles 50'' or less in width. Approximately
7 miles (4 segments) would be located on Lower Trinity Ranger District
to expand motorized recreation opportunity by linking proposed
motorized trails in the Waterman Ridge and Hennessy Ridge networks.
Approximately 0.2 mile (1 segment) would be located on the Mad River
Ranger District to provide access to a dispersed camp.
5. Limited Changes to the National Forest NFTS Roads. The Six
Rivers National Forest proposes the following changes to NFTS roads to
expand motorized trail opportunities, including increasing potential
loops by using existing NFTS roads as links or connections within
proposed networks of motorized trails: Allow both highway licensed
vehicle and non-highway licensed vehicle use on approximately 8 miles
(5 segments) of existing NFTS roads currently open to highway legal
vehicles only on the Lower Trinity Ranger District. Allow both highway
licensed vehicle and non-highway licensed vehicle use on approximately
17\1/2\ miles (12 segments) of existing NFTS roads currently open to
highway legal vehicles only on the Mad River Ranger District. Of these
changes, all but approximately 2\1/2\ miles (1 segment) on the Mad
River Ranger District, are subject to California Vehicle Code
regulations that include the requirement of a licensed operator
operating the vehicle.
6. Limited Changes to NFTS Trails. The Six Rivers National Forest
proposes the following changes to NFTS trails: Allow wheeled vehicles
50 inches or less in width on approximately 4 miles (1 segment) of
existing NFTS trail currently open to motorcycles to augment the Pilot
Creek motorized trail network on the Mad River Ranger District. Convert
approximately 6 miles (2 segments) of existing NFTS motorized trails to
NFTS non-motorized trails on the Mad River Ranger District because of
safety concerns on a segment of Devil's Backbone and due to lack of use
and potential adverse resource effects on the Bradburn Trail.
Maps and tables detailing the proposed action can be found at
https://www.fs.fed.us/r5/sixrivers/projects/ohv/. In addition, maps will
be available for viewing at:
Six Rivers National Forest Supervisor's Office, 1330
Bayshore Way, Eureka, CA 95501; phone: 707-442-1721.
Lower Trinity Ranger District, Highway 96 (2 miles North
of Willow Creek), Willow Creek, CA 95573; phone: 630-629-2118.
Mad River Ranger District, Highway 36 (28 miles east of
Bridgeville), Bridgeville, CA 95526; phone: 707-574-6233.
Responsible Official
Tyrone Kelley, Forest Supervisor, Six Rivers National Forest, 1330
Bayshore Way, Eureka, CA 95501
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The responsible official will decide whether to adopt and implement
the proposed action, an alternative to the proposed action, or take no
action to make changes to existing prohibitions and allowances for
public motor vehicle travel within the existing Six Rivers NF NFTS and
prohibit cross country motor vehicle travel by the public off the
designated system. Once the decision is made, the Six Rivers NF will
publish two Motor Vehicle Use Maps (MVUM) identifying the roads and
trails that are designated for motor vehicle use. The MVUMs shall
specify the classes of vehicles and, if appropriate, the time of year
for which use is designated. Future decisions associated with changes
to the MVUMs may trigger the need for documentation of environmental
analysis.
This proposal does not revisit previous administrative decisions
that resulted in the current NFTS. This proposal is focused on
implementing Subpart B of the Travel Management Rule. Previous
administrative decisions concerning road construction, road
reconstruction, trail construction, and land suitability for motorized
use on the existing NFTS are outside of the scope of this proposal.
Scoping Process
Public participation will be especially important at several points
during the analysis. The Forest Service will be seeking information,
comments, and assistance from federal, state, and local agencies and
other individuals or organizations who may be interested in or affected
by the proposed action.
The Six Rivers NF has been meeting with local elected officials,
Tribes, and community groups, including service and professional
organizations, to discuss the Travel Management Rule and travel
management on the Lower Trinity and Mad River Ranger Districts since
2005. In May and June of 2005,
[[Page 77605]]
public workshops were held in Eureka, Willow Creek, and Mad River, CA
to inform the public about the Travel Management Rule. In October 2007
and April, May, and June 2008, public workshops were held in those same
locations to gather information from the public about which routes they
use and their concerns. Additionally, maps of inventoried routes were
available on the Forest's Web site and Forest Service offices. The
public used these maps to provide input into the process.
The comment period on the proposed action will extend 45 days from
the date this Notice of Intent is published in the Federal Register.
The draft environmental impact statement is expected to be filed
with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and to be available for
public review by spring 2009. EPA will publish a notice of availability
of the draft EIS in the Federal Register. The comment period on the
draft EIS will extend 45 days from the date the EPA notice appears in
the Federal Register. At that time, copies of the draft EIS will be
distributed to interested and affected agencies, organizations, and
members of the public for their review and comment. It is very
important that those interested in the management of the Six Rivers NF
participate at that time.
The final EIS is scheduled to be completed in summer 2009. In the
final EIS, the Forest Service will respond to comments received during
the comment period that are: within the scope of the proposed action;
specific to the proposed action; have a direct relationship with the
proposed action; and include supporting reasons for the responsible
official to consider. Submission of comments to the draft EIS is a
prerequisite for eligibility to appeal under the 36 CFR part 215
regulations.
Comment Requested
This Notice of Intent initiates the scoping process which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft EIS will be prepared for comment. The
comment period on the draft EIS will be 45 days from the date the EPA
publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register.
At this early stage, it is important to give reviewers notice of
several court rulings related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First, reviewers of draft EISs must
structure their participation in the environmental review of the
proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp.
v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that
could be raised at the draft EIS stage but that are not raised until
after completion of the final EIS may be waived or dismissed by the
courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986)
and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D.
Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very important that
those interested in this proposed action participate by the close of
the 45 day comment period so that comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully
consider them and respond to them in the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft EIS should
be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to
specific pages or chapters of the draft EIS. Comments may also address
the adequacy of the draft EIS or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal
and will be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21)
Dated: December 12, 2008.
Tyrone Kelley,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E8-30047 Filed 12-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P