Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; DHS/USCG-028 Family Advocacy Program, 77553-77554 [E8-29842]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Office of Security
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS–2008–0116]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of
Exemptions; DHS/USCG–028 Family
Advocacy Program
Privacy Office, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) is giving concurrent
notice of a revised and updated system
of records pursuant to the Privacy Act
of 1974 for the Department of Homeland
Security to administer the DHS/USCG–
028 Family Advocacy Program system
of records and this proposed
rulemaking. In this proposed
rulemaking, the Department proposes to
exempt portions of the system of records
from one or more provisions of the
Privacy Act because of criminal, civil,
and administrative enforcement
requirements.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number DHS–
2008–0116, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 1–866–466–5370.
• Mail: Hugo Teufel III, Chief Privacy
Officer, Department of Homeland
Security, Washington, DC 20528.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general questions please contact: David
Roberts (202–475–3521), United States
Coast Guard Privacy Officer, United
States Coast Guard. For privacy issues
please contact: Hugo Teufel III (703–
235–0780), Chief Privacy Officer,
Privacy Office, Department of Homeland
Security, Washington, DC 20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: Pursuant to the savings
clause in the Homeland Security Act of
2002, the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) United States Coast
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
Guard (USCG) have relied on
preexisting Privacy Act systems of
records notices for the collection and
maintenance of records that concern the
Department of Homeland Security to
administer the DHS/USCG–028 United
States Coast Guard Family Advocacy
Program.
As part of its efforts to streamline and
consolidate its record systems, DHS is
updating and reissuing a DHS/USCG
system of records under the Privacy Act
(5 U.S.C. 552a) that deals with USCG
Family Advocacy Program. The
collection and maintenance of this
information will assist DHS/USCG in
meeting its obligation to administer the
USCG Family Advocacy Program.
The Privacy Act embodies fair
information principles in a statutory
framework governing the means by
which the United States Government
collects, maintains, uses, and
disseminates personally identifiable
information. The Privacy Act applies to
information that is maintained in a
‘‘system of records.’’ A ‘‘system of
records’’ is a group of any records under
the control of an agency from which
information is retrieved by the name of
the individual or by some identifying
number, symbol, or other identifying
particular assigned to the individual.
Individuals may request their own
records that are maintained in a system
of records in the possession or under the
control of DHS by complying with DHS
Privacy Act regulations, 6 CFR part 5.
The Privacy Act requires each agency
to publish in the Federal Register a
description of the type and character of
each system of records that the agency
maintains, and the routine uses that are
contained in each system in order to
make agency recordkeeping practices
transparent, to notify individuals
regarding the uses to which personally
identifiable information is put, and to
assist individuals in finding such files
within the agency.
The Privacy Act allows Government
agencies to exempt certain records from
the access and amendment provisions. If
an agency claims an exemption,
however, it must issue a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking to make clear to
the public the reasons why a particular
exemption is claimed.
DHS is claiming exemptions from
certain requirements of the Privacy Act
for DHS/USCG–028 Family Advocacy
Case Records. Some information in
DHS/USCG–028 Family Advocacy Case
Records relates to law enforcement.
These exemptions are needed to protect
information relating to DHS activities
from disclosure to subjects or others
related to these activities. Specifically,
the exemptions are required to preclude
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77553
subjects of these activities from
frustrating these processes; to avoid
disclosure of activity techniques; to
protect the identities and physical safety
of confidential informants and law
enforcement personnel; to ensure DHS’s
ability to obtain information from third
parties and other sources; and to protect
the privacy of third parties. Disclosure
of information to the subject of the
inquiry could also permit the subject to
avoid detection or apprehension.
The exemptions proposed here are
standard law enforcement and national
security exemptions exercised by a large
number of Federal law enforcement and
intelligence agencies. In appropriate
circumstances, where compliance
would not appear to interfere with or
adversely affect the law enforcement
purposes of this system and the overall
law enforcement process, the applicable
exemptions may be waived on a case by
case basis.
A notice of system of records for DHS/
USCG–028 Family Advocacy Program is
also published in this issue of the
Federal Register.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of information; Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, DHS proposes to amend
Chapter I of Title 6, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
PART 5—DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS
AND INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for Part 5
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; Public Law
107–296, 116 Stat. 2135; 5 U.S.C. 301.
Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. Add at the end of Appendix C to
Part 5, the following new paragraph
‘‘14’’:
Appendix C to Part 5—DHS Systems of
Records Exempt From the Privacy Act
*
*
*
*
*
14. The Department of Homeland Security/
United States Coast Guard—028 Family
Advocacy Case Records system of records
consists of electronic and paper records and
will be used by DHS and its components.
DHS/USCG–028 Family Advocacy Case
Records is a repository of information held
by DHS in connection with its several and
varied missions and functions, including, but
not limited to: The enforcement of civil and
criminal laws; investigations, inquiries, and
proceedings thereunder. DHS/USCG–028
Family Advocacy Case Records contains
information that is collected by, on behalf of,
in support of, or in cooperation with DHS
and its components and may contain
personally identifiable information collected
by other Federal, State, local, tribal, foreign,
or international government agencies.
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
77554
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) this system is
exempt from the following provisions of the
Privacy Act, subject to the limitations set
forth in those subsections: 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
(e)(4)(I), and (f). Exemptions from these
particular subsections are justified, on a caseby-case basis to be determined at the time a
request is made, for the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for
Disclosures) because release of the
accounting of disclosures could alert the
subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of the investigation,
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS as well as the recipient agency.
Disclosure of the accounting would therefore
present a serious impediment to law
enforcement efforts and/or efforts to preserve
national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension, which would undermine the
entire investigative process.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records)
because access to the records contained in
this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation, to the existence of the
investigation, and reveal investigative
interest on the part of DHS or another agency.
Access to the records could permit the
individual who is the subject of a record to
impede the investigation, to tamper with
witnesses or evidence, and to avoid detection
or apprehension. Amendment of the records
could interfere with ongoing investigations
and law enforcement activities and would
impose an impossible administrative burden
by requiring investigations to be
continuously reinvestigated. In addition,
permitting access and amendment to such
information could disclose security-sensitive
information that could be detrimental to
homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and
Necessity of Information) because in the
course of investigations into potential
violations of Federal law, the accuracy of
information obtained or introduced
occasionally may be unclear or the
information may not be strictly relevant or
necessary to a specific investigation. In the
interests of effective law enforcement, it is
appropriate to retain all information that may
aid in establishing patterns of unlawful
activity.
(d) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I)
(Agency Requirements), and (f) (Agency
Rules) because portions of this system are
exempt from the individual access provisions
of subsection (d) for the reasons noted above,
and therefore DHS is not required to establish
requirements, rules, or procedures with
respect to such access. Providing notice to
individuals with respect to existence of
records pertaining to them in the system of
records or otherwise setting up procedures
pursuant to which individuals may access
and view records pertaining to themselves in
the system would undermine investigative
efforts and reveal the identities of witnesses,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
and potential witnesses, and confidential
informants.
Dated: December 10, 2008.
Hugo Teufel III,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. E8–29842 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
9 CFR Part 2
[Docket No. APHIS–2006–0159]
Handling of Animals; Contingency
Plans
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
comment period.
SUMMARY: We are extending the
comment period for our proposed rule
that would amend the Animal Welfare
Act regulations to add requirements for
contingency planning and training of
personnel by research facilities and by
dealers, exhibitors, intermediate
handlers, and carriers. This action will
allow interested persons additional time
to prepare and submit comments.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before February
20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/
component/main?main=
DocketDetail&d=APHIS-2006-0159 to
submit or view comments and to view
supporting and related materials
available electronically.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Please send two copies of your comment
to Docket No. APHIS–2006–0159,
Regulatory Analysis and Development,
PPD, APHIS, Station 3A–03.8, 4700
River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD
20737–1238. Please state that your
comment refers to Docket No. APHIS–
2006–0159.
Reading Room: You may read any
comments that we receive on this
docket in our reading room. The reading
room is located in room 1141 of the
USDA South Building, 14th Street and
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 690–2817 before
coming.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Other Information: Additional
information about APHIS and its
programs is available on the Internet at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Jodie Kulpa-Eddy, Staff Veterinarian,
Animal Care, APHIS, 4700 River Road
Unit 84, Riverdale, MD 20737; (301)
734–7833.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 23, 2008, we published in the
Federal Register (73 FR 63085–63090,
Docket No. APHIS–2006–0159) a
proposal to amend the Animal Welfare
Act regulations to add requirements for
contingency planning and training of
personnel by research facilities and by
dealers, exhibitors, intermediate
handlers, and carriers.
Comments on the proposed rule were
required to be received on or before
December 22, 2008. We are extending
the comment period on Docket No.
APHIS–2006–0159 for an additional 60
days. This action will allow interested
persons additional time to prepare and
submit comments.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2131–2159; 7 CFR 2.22,
2.80, and 371.7.
Done in Washington, DC, this 16th day of
December 2008.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8–30220 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
[Docket No. R–1340]
12 CFR Part 226
Regulation Z; Truth in Lending
AGENCY: Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
comment period.
SUMMARY: On December 10, 2008, the
Board published a proposal to amend
Regulation Z that would conform the
regulation to reflect recent amendments
to the Truth in Lending Act (73 FR
74989). The Board is extending the
public comment period on the proposal.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 9, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed amendments to
Regulation Z, identified by Docket No.
R–1340, by any of the following
methods:
• Agency Web site: https://
www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments at
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 245 (Friday, December 19, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77553-77554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-29842]
[[Page 77553]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Office of Security
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS-2008-0116]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; DHS/USCG-028
Family Advocacy Program
AGENCY: Privacy Office, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is giving concurrent
notice of a revised and updated system of records pursuant to the
Privacy Act of 1974 for the Department of Homeland Security to
administer the DHS/USCG-028 Family Advocacy Program system of records
and this proposed rulemaking. In this proposed rulemaking, the
Department proposes to exempt portions of the system of records from
one or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil,
and administrative enforcement requirements.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number DHS-
2008-0116, by one of the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 1-866-466-5370.
Mail: Hugo Teufel III, Chief Privacy Officer, Department
of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this notice. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions please contact:
David Roberts (202-475-3521), United States Coast Guard Privacy
Officer, United States Coast Guard. For privacy issues please contact:
Hugo Teufel III (703-235-0780), Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office,
Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: Pursuant to the savings clause
in the Homeland Security Act of 2002, the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) United States Coast Guard (USCG) have relied on
preexisting Privacy Act systems of records notices for the collection
and maintenance of records that concern the Department of Homeland
Security to administer the DHS/USCG-028 United States Coast Guard
Family Advocacy Program.
As part of its efforts to streamline and consolidate its record
systems, DHS is updating and reissuing a DHS/USCG system of records
under the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) that deals with USCG Family
Advocacy Program. The collection and maintenance of this information
will assist DHS/USCG in meeting its obligation to administer the USCG
Family Advocacy Program.
The Privacy Act embodies fair information principles in a statutory
framework governing the means by which the United States Government
collects, maintains, uses, and disseminates personally identifiable
information. The Privacy Act applies to information that is maintained
in a ``system of records.'' A ``system of records'' is a group of any
records under the control of an agency from which information is
retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying number,
symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual.
Individuals may request their own records that are maintained in a
system of records in the possession or under the control of DHS by
complying with DHS Privacy Act regulations, 6 CFR part 5.
The Privacy Act requires each agency to publish in the Federal
Register a description of the type and character of each system of
records that the agency maintains, and the routine uses that are
contained in each system in order to make agency recordkeeping
practices transparent, to notify individuals regarding the uses to
which personally identifiable information is put, and to assist
individuals in finding such files within the agency.
The Privacy Act allows Government agencies to exempt certain
records from the access and amendment provisions. If an agency claims
an exemption, however, it must issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to
make clear to the public the reasons why a particular exemption is
claimed.
DHS is claiming exemptions from certain requirements of the Privacy
Act for DHS/USCG-028 Family Advocacy Case Records. Some information in
DHS/USCG-028 Family Advocacy Case Records relates to law enforcement.
These exemptions are needed to protect information relating to DHS
activities from disclosure to subjects or others related to these
activities. Specifically, the exemptions are required to preclude
subjects of these activities from frustrating these processes; to avoid
disclosure of activity techniques; to protect the identities and
physical safety of confidential informants and law enforcement
personnel; to ensure DHS's ability to obtain information from third
parties and other sources; and to protect the privacy of third parties.
Disclosure of information to the subject of the inquiry could also
permit the subject to avoid detection or apprehension.
The exemptions proposed here are standard law enforcement and
national security exemptions exercised by a large number of Federal law
enforcement and intelligence agencies. In appropriate circumstances,
where compliance would not appear to interfere with or adversely affect
the law enforcement purposes of this system and the overall law
enforcement process, the applicable exemptions may be waived on a case
by case basis.
A notice of system of records for DHS/USCG-028 Family Advocacy
Program is also published in this issue of the Federal Register.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of information; Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS proposes to amend
Chapter I of Title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 5--DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for Part 5 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; Public Law 107-296, 116 Stat.
2135; 5 U.S.C. 301. Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. Add at the end of Appendix C to Part 5, the following new
paragraph ``14'':
Appendix C to Part 5--DHS Systems of Records Exempt From the Privacy
Act
* * * * *
14. The Department of Homeland Security/ United States Coast
Guard--028 Family Advocacy Case Records system of records consists
of electronic and paper records and will be used by DHS and its
components. DHS/USCG-028 Family Advocacy Case Records is a
repository of information held by DHS in connection with its several
and varied missions and functions, including, but not limited to:
The enforcement of civil and criminal laws; investigations,
inquiries, and proceedings thereunder. DHS/USCG-028 Family Advocacy
Case Records contains information that is collected by, on behalf
of, in support of, or in cooperation with DHS and its components and
may contain personally identifiable information collected by other
Federal, State, local, tribal, foreign, or international government
agencies.
[[Page 77554]]
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) this system is exempt from the
following provisions of the Privacy Act, subject to the limitations
set forth in those subsections: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1),
(e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), and (f). Exemptions from these
particular subsections are justified, on a case-by-case basis to be
determined at the time a request is made, for the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for Disclosures) because
release of the accounting of disclosures could alert the subject of
an investigation of an actual or potential criminal, civil, or
regulatory violation to the existence of the investigation, and
reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS as well as the
recipient agency. Disclosure of the accounting would therefore
present a serious impediment to law enforcement efforts and/or
efforts to preserve national security. Disclosure of the accounting
would also permit the individual who is the subject of a record to
impede the investigation, to tamper with witnesses or evidence, and
to avoid detection or apprehension, which would undermine the entire
investigative process.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records) because access to
the records contained in this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal,
civil, or regulatory violation, to the existence of the
investigation, and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS
or another agency. Access to the records could permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the investigation, to
tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension. Amendment of the records could interfere with ongoing
investigations and law enforcement activities and would impose an
impossible administrative burden by requiring investigations to be
continuously reinvestigated. In addition, permitting access and
amendment to such information could disclose security-sensitive
information that could be detrimental to homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and Necessity of
Information) because in the course of investigations into potential
violations of Federal law, the accuracy of information obtained or
introduced occasionally may be unclear or the information may not be
strictly relevant or necessary to a specific investigation. In the
interests of effective law enforcement, it is appropriate to retain
all information that may aid in establishing patterns of unlawful
activity.
(d) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I) (Agency
Requirements), and (f) (Agency Rules) because portions of this
system are exempt from the individual access provisions of
subsection (d) for the reasons noted above, and therefore DHS is not
required to establish requirements, rules, or procedures with
respect to such access. Providing notice to individuals with respect
to existence of records pertaining to them in the system of records
or otherwise setting up procedures pursuant to which individuals may
access and view records pertaining to themselves in the system would
undermine investigative efforts and reveal the identities of
witnesses, and potential witnesses, and confidential informants.
Dated: December 10, 2008.
Hugo Teufel III,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. E8-29842 Filed 12-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-10-P