Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; U.S. Customs and Border Protection-015 Automated Commercial System, 77548-77549 [E8-29839]
Download as PDF
77548
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and
Necessity of Information) because in the
course of investigations into potential
violations of Federal law, the accuracy of
information obtained or introduced
occasionally may be unclear or the
information may not be strictly relevant or
necessary to a specific investigation. In the
interests of effective law enforcement, it is
appropriate to retain all information that may
aid in establishing patterns of unlawful
activity.
(d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of
Information from Individuals) because
requiring that information be collected from
the subject of an investigation would alert the
subject to the nature or existence of an
investigation, thereby interfering with the
related investigation and law enforcement
activities.
(e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to
Subjects) because providing such detailed
information would impede law enforcement
in that it could compromise investigations
by: Revealing the existence of an otherwise
confidential investigation and thereby
provide an opportunity for the subject of an
investigation to conceal evidence, alter
patterns of behavior, or take other actions
that could thwart investigative efforts; reveal
the identity of witnesses in investigations,
thereby providing an opportunity for the
subjects of the investigations or others to
harass, intimidate, or otherwise interfere
with the collection of evidence or other
information from such witnesses; or reveal
the identity of confidential informants,
which would negatively affect the
informant’s usefulness in any ongoing or
future investigations and discourage
members of the public from cooperating as
confidential informants in any future
investigations.
(f) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I)
(Agency Requirements), and (f) (Agency
Rules) because portions of this system are
exempt from the individual access provisions
of subsection (d) for the reasons noted above,
and therefore DHS is not required to establish
requirements, rules, or procedures with
respect to such access. Providing notice to
individuals with respect to existence of
records pertaining to them in the system of
records or otherwise setting up procedures
pursuant to which individuals may access
and view records pertaining to themselves in
the system would undermine investigative
efforts and reveal the identities of witnesses,
and potential witnesses, and confidential
informants.
(g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of
Information) because in the collection of
information for law enforcement purposes it
is impossible to determine in advance what
information is accurate, relevant, timely, and
complete. Compliance with (e)(5) would
preclude DHS agents from using their
investigative training and exercise of good
judgment to both conduct and report on
investigations.
(h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on
Individuals) because compliance would
interfere with DHS’ ability to obtain, serve,
and issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law
enforcement mechanisms that may be filed
under seal, and could result in disclosure of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
investigative techniques, procedures, and
evidence.
(i) From subsection (g) to the extent that
the system is exempt from other specific
subsections of the Privacy Act relating to
individuals’ rights to access and amend their
records contained in the system. Therefore
DHS is not required to establish rules or
procedures pursuant to which individuals
may seek a civil remedy for the agency’s:
Refusal to amend a record; refusal to comply
with a request for access to records; failure
to maintain accurate, relevant timely and
complete records; or failure to otherwise
comply with an individual’s right to access
or amend records.
Dated: December 10, 2008.
Hugo Teufel III,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. E8–29876 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No DHS–2008–0195]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of
Exemptions; U.S. Customs and Border
Protection—015 Automated
Commercial System
Privacy Office, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland
Security is amending its regulations to
exempt portions of a system of records
from certain provisions of the Privacy
Act. Specifically, the Department
proposes to exempt portions of the CBP
Automated Commercial System (ACS)
from one or more provisions of the
Privacy Act because of criminal, civil,
and administrative enforcement
requirements.
DATES: The public is invited to submit
comments by January 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number DHS–
2008–0195 by one of the following
methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 1–866–466–5370.
• Mail: Hugo Teufel III, Chief Privacy
Officer, Privacy Office, Department of
Homeland Security, Washington, DC
20528.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general questions please contact:
Laurence E. Castelli (202–325–0280),
Chief, Privacy Act Policy and
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Procedures Branch, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of International Trade,
1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20229. For privacy
issues please contact: Hugo Teufel III
(703–235–0780), Chief Privacy Officer,
Privacy Office, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security, Washington, DC
20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), elsewhere in this
edition of the Federal Register,
published a Privacy Act system of
records notice describing records in the
Automated Commercial System (ACS).
To help prevent terrorist weapons
from being transported to the United
States, vessel carriers bringing cargo to
the United States are required to
transmit certain information to Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) about the
cargo they are transporting prior to
lading that cargo at foreign ports of
entry. CBP is issuing an interim final
rule that requires both importers and
carriers to submit additional
information pertaining to cargo to CBP
before the cargo is brought into the
United States by vessel. This
information must be submitted to CBP
by way of a CBP-approved electronic
data interchange system. The required
information is necessary to improve
CBP’s ability to identify high-risk
shipments so as to prevent smuggling
and ensure cargo safety and security, as
required by section 203 of the Security
and Accountability for Every (SAFE)
Port Act of 2006 and section 343(a) of
the Trade Act of 2002, as amended by
the Maritime Transportation Security
Act of 2002.
The proposed rule was known to the
trade as both the ‘‘Importer Security
Filing proposal’’ and the ‘‘10 + 2
proposal.’’ The name ‘‘10 + 2’’ is
shorthand for the number of advance
data elements CBP was proposing to
collect. Carriers would be generally
required to submit two additional data
elements—a vessel stow plan and
container status messages regarding
certain events relating to containers
loaded on vessels destined to the United
States—to the elements they are already
required to electronically transmit in
advance (the ‘‘2’’ of ‘‘10 + 2’’); and
importers, as defined in the proposed
regulations, would be required to
submit ten data elements—an Importer
Security Filing containing ten data
elements (the ‘‘10’’ of ‘‘10 + 2’’).
The Automated Commercial System
(ACS) is the comprehensive system used
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Proposed Rules
by U.S. Customs and Border Protection
to track, control, and process all
commercial goods imported into the
United States. ACS is a sophisticated
and integrated large-scale businessoriented system which employs
multiple modules to perform discrete
aspects of its functionality: including
receiving data transmissions from a
variety of parties involved in
international commercial transactions,
and providing CBP with the capability
to track both the transport transactions
and the financial transactions associated
with the movement of merchandise
through international commerce.
Through the use of Electronic Data
Interchange (EDI), ACS facilitates
merchandise processing, significantly
cuts costs, and reduces paperwork
requirements for both Customs and the
importing community.
ACS has two principal methods for
electronic data interchange, the
Automated Broker Interface (ABI) and
the Automated Manifest System (AMS).
Under the ‘‘10 + 2’’ program, importers
who submit the Importer Security Filing
(ISF), will use either ABI or Vessel AMS
to provide their information to CBP.
ACS, upon receipt of the ISF, will
transfer the data to the Automated
Targeting System (ATS) for screening
and targeting purposes. Once screened
the ISF data will be returned with
embedded targeting links to ACS to be
maintained in accordance with the ACS
stated retention policy.
No exemption shall be asserted with
respect to information maintained in the
system as it relates to data submitted by
or on behalf of a person who travels to
visit the United States, nor shall an
exemption be asserted with respect to
the resulting determination (authorized
to travel, not authorized to travel,
pending).
This system may contain records or
information pertaining to the accounting
of disclosures made from ACS to other
law enforcement agencies (Federal,
State, local, foreign, international, or
tribal) in accordance with the published
routine uses. For the accounting of these
disclosures only, in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and (k)(2), DHS will
claim the original exemptions for these
records or information from subsection
(c)(3), (e)(8), and (g) of the Privacy Act
of 1974, as amended, as necessary and
appropriate to protect such information.
Moreover, DHS will add this exemption
to Appendix C to 6 CFR part 5, DHS
Systems of Records Exempt from the
Privacy Act. Such exempt records or
information may be law enforcement or
national security investigation records,
law enforcement activity and encounter
records, or terrorist screening records.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:41 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
DHS needs these exemptions in order
to protect information relating to law
enforcement investigations from
disclosure to subjects of investigations
and others who could interfere with
investigatory and law enforcement
activities. Specifically, the exemptions
are required to: Preclude subjects of
investigations from frustrating the
investigative process; avoid disclosure
of investigative techniques; protect the
identities and physical safety of
confidential informants and of law
enforcement personnel; ensure DHS’s
and other federal agencies’ ability to
obtain information from third parties
and other sources; protect the privacy of
third parties; and safeguard sensitive
information.
Nonetheless, DHS will examine each
request on a case-by-case basis, and,
after conferring with the appropriate
component or agency, may waive
applicable exemptions in appropriate
circumstances and where it would not
appear to interfere with or adversely
affect the law enforcement or national
security investigation.
Again, DHS will not assert any
exemption with respect to information
maintained in the system that is
collected from a person and submitted
by that person’s air or vessel carrier, if
that person, or his or her agent, seeks
access or amendment of such
information.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of information, Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, DHS proposes to amend
Chapter I of Title 6, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
PART 5—DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS
AND INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for Part 5
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Public Law 107–296, 116 Stat.
2135, 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; 5 U.S.C. 301.
Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
2. At the end of Appendix C to Part
5, add the following new paragraph
‘‘14’’:
Appendix C to Part 5—DHS Systems of
Records Exempt From the Privacy Act
*
*
*
*
*
14. DHS/CBP–015, Automated Commercial
System (ACS). A portion of the following
system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3), (e)(8), and (g) pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(j)(2) and (k)(2). Further, no exemption
shall be asserted with respect to information
maintained in the system as it relates to data
submitted by or on behalf of a person who
travels to visit the United States and crosses
the border, nor shall an exemption be
asserted with respect to the resulting
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77549
determination (approval or denial). After
conferring with the appropriate component
or agency, DHS may waive applicable
exemptions in appropriate circumstances and
where it would not appear to interfere with
or adversely affect the law enforcement
purposes of the systems from which the
information is recompiled or in which it is
contained. Exemptions from the above
particular subsections are justified, on a caseby-case basis to be determined at the time a
request is made, when information in this
system of records may impede a law
enforcement or national security
investigation:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for
Disclosure) because making available to a
record subject the accounting of disclosures
from records concerning him or her would
specifically reveal any investigative interest
in the individual. Revealing this information
could reasonably be expected to compromise
ongoing efforts to investigate a violation of
U.S. law, including investigations of a known
or suspected terrorist, by notifying the record
subject that he or she is under investigation.
This information could also permit the
record subject to take measures to impede the
investigation, e.g., destroy evidence,
intimidate potential witnesses, or flee the
area to avoid or impede the investigation.
(b) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on
Individuals) because to require individual
notice of disclosure of information due to
compulsory legal process would pose an
impossible administrative burden on DHS
and other agencies and could alert the
subjects of counterterrorism or law
enforcement investigations to the fact of
those investigations when not previously
known.
(c) From subsection (g) (Civil Remedies) to
the extent that the system is exempt from
other specific subsections of the Privacy Act.
Dated: December 10, 2008.
Hugo Teufel III,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. E8–29839 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS–2008–0171]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of
Exemptions; DHS/CBP–009
Nonimmigrant Inspection System
AGENCY: Privacy Office, Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland
Security is amending its regulations to
exempt portions of a system of records
from certain provisions of the Privacy
Act. Specifically, the Department
E:\FR\FM\19DEP1.SGM
19DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 245 (Friday, December 19, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77548-77549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-29839]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No DHS-2008-0195]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; U.S. Customs
and Border Protection--015 Automated Commercial System
AGENCY: Privacy Office, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security is amending its
regulations to exempt portions of a system of records from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act. Specifically, the Department proposes to
exempt portions of the CBP Automated Commercial System (ACS) from one
or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and
administrative enforcement requirements.
DATES: The public is invited to submit comments by January 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number DHS-
2008-0195 by one of the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 1-866-466-5370.
Mail: Hugo Teufel III, Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy
Office, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions please contact:
Laurence E. Castelli (202-325-0280), Chief, Privacy Act Policy and
Procedures Branch, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of International Trade, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20229. For privacy issues please contact: Hugo Teufel
III (703-235-0780), Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), elsewhere in this
edition of the Federal Register, published a Privacy Act system of
records notice describing records in the Automated Commercial System
(ACS).
To help prevent terrorist weapons from being transported to the
United States, vessel carriers bringing cargo to the United States are
required to transmit certain information to Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) about the cargo they are transporting prior to lading
that cargo at foreign ports of entry. CBP is issuing an interim final
rule that requires both importers and carriers to submit additional
information pertaining to cargo to CBP before the cargo is brought into
the United States by vessel. This information must be submitted to CBP
by way of a CBP-approved electronic data interchange system. The
required information is necessary to improve CBP's ability to identify
high-risk shipments so as to prevent smuggling and ensure cargo safety
and security, as required by section 203 of the Security and
Accountability for Every (SAFE) Port Act of 2006 and section 343(a) of
the Trade Act of 2002, as amended by the Maritime Transportation
Security Act of 2002.
The proposed rule was known to the trade as both the ``Importer
Security Filing proposal'' and the ``10 + 2 proposal.'' The name ``10 +
2'' is shorthand for the number of advance data elements CBP was
proposing to collect. Carriers would be generally required to submit
two additional data elements--a vessel stow plan and container status
messages regarding certain events relating to containers loaded on
vessels destined to the United States--to the elements they are already
required to electronically transmit in advance (the ``2'' of ``10 +
2''); and importers, as defined in the proposed regulations, would be
required to submit ten data elements--an Importer Security Filing
containing ten data elements (the ``10'' of ``10 + 2'').
The Automated Commercial System (ACS) is the comprehensive system
used
[[Page 77549]]
by U.S. Customs and Border Protection to track, control, and process
all commercial goods imported into the United States. ACS is a
sophisticated and integrated large-scale business-oriented system which
employs multiple modules to perform discrete aspects of its
functionality: including receiving data transmissions from a variety of
parties involved in international commercial transactions, and
providing CBP with the capability to track both the transport
transactions and the financial transactions associated with the
movement of merchandise through international commerce. Through the use
of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), ACS facilitates merchandise
processing, significantly cuts costs, and reduces paperwork
requirements for both Customs and the importing community.
ACS has two principal methods for electronic data interchange, the
Automated Broker Interface (ABI) and the Automated Manifest System
(AMS). Under the ``10 + 2'' program, importers who submit the Importer
Security Filing (ISF), will use either ABI or Vessel AMS to provide
their information to CBP. ACS, upon receipt of the ISF, will transfer
the data to the Automated Targeting System (ATS) for screening and
targeting purposes. Once screened the ISF data will be returned with
embedded targeting links to ACS to be maintained in accordance with the
ACS stated retention policy.
No exemption shall be asserted with respect to information
maintained in the system as it relates to data submitted by or on
behalf of a person who travels to visit the United States, nor shall an
exemption be asserted with respect to the resulting determination
(authorized to travel, not authorized to travel, pending).
This system may contain records or information pertaining to the
accounting of disclosures made from ACS to other law enforcement
agencies (Federal, State, local, foreign, international, or tribal) in
accordance with the published routine uses. For the accounting of these
disclosures only, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and (k)(2),
DHS will claim the original exemptions for these records or information
from subsection (c)(3), (e)(8), and (g) of the Privacy Act of 1974, as
amended, as necessary and appropriate to protect such information.
Moreover, DHS will add this exemption to Appendix C to 6 CFR part 5,
DHS Systems of Records Exempt from the Privacy Act. Such exempt records
or information may be law enforcement or national security
investigation records, law enforcement activity and encounter records,
or terrorist screening records.
DHS needs these exemptions in order to protect information relating
to law enforcement investigations from disclosure to subjects of
investigations and others who could interfere with investigatory and
law enforcement activities. Specifically, the exemptions are required
to: Preclude subjects of investigations from frustrating the
investigative process; avoid disclosure of investigative techniques;
protect the identities and physical safety of confidential informants
and of law enforcement personnel; ensure DHS's and other federal
agencies' ability to obtain information from third parties and other
sources; protect the privacy of third parties; and safeguard sensitive
information.
Nonetheless, DHS will examine each request on a case-by-case basis,
and, after conferring with the appropriate component or agency, may
waive applicable exemptions in appropriate circumstances and where it
would not appear to interfere with or adversely affect the law
enforcement or national security investigation.
Again, DHS will not assert any exemption with respect to
information maintained in the system that is collected from a person
and submitted by that person's air or vessel carrier, if that person,
or his or her agent, seeks access or amendment of such information.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of information, Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS proposes to amend
Chapter I of Title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 5--DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for Part 5 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Public Law 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135, 6 U.S.C. 101 et
seq.; 5 U.S.C. 301. Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
2. At the end of Appendix C to Part 5, add the following new
paragraph ``14'':
Appendix C to Part 5--DHS Systems of Records Exempt From the Privacy
Act
* * * * *
14. DHS/CBP-015, Automated Commercial System (ACS). A portion of
the following system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3),
(e)(8), and (g) pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and (k)(2). Further,
no exemption shall be asserted with respect to information
maintained in the system as it relates to data submitted by or on
behalf of a person who travels to visit the United States and
crosses the border, nor shall an exemption be asserted with respect
to the resulting determination (approval or denial). After
conferring with the appropriate component or agency, DHS may waive
applicable exemptions in appropriate circumstances and where it
would not appear to interfere with or adversely affect the law
enforcement purposes of the systems from which the information is
recompiled or in which it is contained. Exemptions from the above
particular subsections are justified, on a case-by-case basis to be
determined at the time a request is made, when information in this
system of records may impede a law enforcement or national security
investigation:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for Disclosure) because
making available to a record subject the accounting of disclosures
from records concerning him or her would specifically reveal any
investigative interest in the individual. Revealing this information
could reasonably be expected to compromise ongoing efforts to
investigate a violation of U.S. law, including investigations of a
known or suspected terrorist, by notifying the record subject that
he or she is under investigation. This information could also permit
the record subject to take measures to impede the investigation,
e.g., destroy evidence, intimidate potential witnesses, or flee the
area to avoid or impede the investigation.
(b) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on Individuals) because to
require individual notice of disclosure of information due to
compulsory legal process would pose an impossible administrative
burden on DHS and other agencies and could alert the subjects of
counterterrorism or law enforcement investigations to the fact of
those investigations when not previously known.
(c) From subsection (g) (Civil Remedies) to the extent that the
system is exempt from other specific subsections of the Privacy Act.
Dated: December 10, 2008.
Hugo Teufel III,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. E8-29839 Filed 12-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-10-P