Migratory Bird Subsistence Harvest in Alaska; Harvest Regulations for Migratory Birds in Alaska During the 2009 Season, 76994-76999 [E8-30081]
Download as PDF
76994
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
3. The petitioners present information
that the Act authorizes the listing of a
species, subspecies, or DPS; the Service
listed a United States DPS based on the
international boundary with Canada,
and no further distinctions (e.g.,
limiting to specific States) can be made.
4. The petitioners discuss and provide
information to support their assessment
that the lynx should be listed in New
Mexico (Ruediger et al. 2000; Frey 2006;
Frey 2003; Malaney 2003; Malaney and
Frey 2005; BISON 2003; Checklist 2003;
and Shenk 2001, 2005a, 2005b, 2006,
2007). The petitioners indicate that the
Southern Rockies include high
elevation, mountainous habitat that
extends into north-central New Mexico.
They indicate that, although no known
historical occurrence records of lynx in
New Mexico exist (Frey 2006, p. 20), we
should carefully review the forest zones
in New Mexico to ascertain whether
suitable habitat exists.
5. The petitioners discuss why the
lynx final listing rule is not logical and
is contrary to the purpose and goals of
the Act that include conserving
ecosystems upon which species depend.
The petitioners indicate that lynx
traveling into New Mexico could be
legally shot and hunted, and that this is
contrary to the purpose of the Act,
which is to provide a means whereby
the ecosystems upon which threatened
and endangered species depend may be
conserved.
Finding
We reviewed the petition, supporting
information provided by the petitioners,
and information in our files.
We find that the petition presents
substantial scientific or commercial
information indicating that changing the
listing status of Canada lynx to include
New Mexico in the threatened
contiguous United States Distinct
Population Segment may be warranted.
Therefore, we will initiate a review of
the specific points raised by the
petitioners and the best available
information, and present our analysis
and determination in our 12-month
finding.
It is important to note that the
‘‘substantial information’’ standard for a
90-day finding is in contrast to the Act’s
‘‘best scientific and commercial data’’
standard that applies to a 12-month
finding as to whether a petitioned action
is warranted. A 90-day finding is not a
status assessment of the species and
does not constitute a status review
under the Act. Our final determination
as to whether a petitioned action is
warranted is not made until we have
completed a thorough review of issues
raised in the petition that are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:43 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
substantial, which is conducted
following a substantial 90-day finding.
Because the Act’s standards for 90-day
and 12-month findings are different, as
described above, a substantial 90-day
finding does not mean that the 12month finding will result in a warranted
finding.
References Cited
A complete list of all references cited
herein is available upon request from
the Montana Ecological Services Field
Office (see the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section).
Author
The primary authors of this document
are staff from the Montana Ecological
Services Field Office (see the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section).
Authority
The authority for this action is section
4 of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.).
Dated: December 12, 2008.
Rowan W. Gould,
Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. E8–30110 Filed 12–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 92
[FWS–R7–MB–2008–0099; 91200–1231–
9BPP L2]
RIN 1018–AW29
Migratory Bird Subsistence Harvest in
Alaska; Harvest Regulations for
Migratory Birds in Alaska During the
2009 Season
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service or we) proposes
migratory bird subsistence harvest
regulations in Alaska for the 2009
season. The proposed regulations would
enable the continuation of customary
and traditional subsistence uses of
migratory birds in Alaska and prescribe
regional information on when and
where the harvesting of birds may
occur. These proposed regulations were
developed under a co-management
process involving the Service, the
Alaska Department of Fish and Game,
and Alaska Native representatives. The
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
rulemaking is necessary because the
regulations governing the subsistence
harvest of migratory birds in Alaska are
subject to annual review. This
rulemaking proposes region-specific
regulations that would go into effect on
April 2, 2009, and expire on August 31,
2009.
DATES: We will accept comments
received or postmarked on or before
January 20, 2009. We must receive
requests for public hearings, in writing,
at the address shown in FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT by February 2,
2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: RIN 1018–
AW29, Division of Policy and Directives
Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite
222, Arlington, VA 22203.
We will not accept e-mail or faxes. We
will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see the
Public Comments section below for
more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred
Armstrong, (907) 786–3887, or Donna
Dewhurst, (907) 786–3499, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, 1011 E. Tudor
Road, Mail Stop 201, Anchorage, AK
99503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comments
You may submit your comments and
materials concerning this proposed rule
by one of the methods listed in the
ADDRESSES section. We will not accept
comments sent by e-mail or fax or to an
address not listed in the ADDRESSES
section. We will not consider handdelivered comments that we do not
receive, or mailed comments that are
not postmarked, by the date specified in
the DATES section.
We will post your entire comment—
including your personal identifying
information—on https://
www.regulations.gov. If you provide
personal identifying information in your
comment, you may request at the top of
your document that we withhold this
information from public review.
However, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so.
Comments and materials we receive,
as well as supporting documentation we
used in preparing this proposed rule,
will be available for public inspection
on https://www.regulations.gov, or by
E:\FR\FM\18DEP1.SGM
18DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules
appointment, during normal business
hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Office of the Alaska Migratory
Bird Co-management Council, 1011 E.
Tudor Rd., Anchorage, AK 99503, (877)
229–2344.
Why Is This Current Rulemaking
Necessary?
This current rulemaking is necessary
because, by law, the migratory bird
harvest season is closed unless opened
by the Secretary of the Interior, and the
regulations governing subsistence
harvest of migratory birds in Alaska are
subject to public review and annual
approval. The Alaska Migratory Bird Comanagement Council (Co-management
Council) held a meeting in April 2008
to develop recommendations for
changes effective for the 2009 harvest
season. These recommendations were
presented to the Service Regulations
Committee (SRC) on July 30 and 31,
2008, and were approved.
This rule proposes regulations for the
taking of migratory birds for subsistence
uses in Alaska during 2009. This rule
lists migratory bird season openings and
closures by region.
How Do I Find the History of These
Regulations?
Background information, including
past events leading to this action,
accomplishments since the Migratory
Bird Treaties with Canada and Mexico
were amended, and a history addressing
conservation issues can be found in the
following Federal Register documents:
Date
August 16, 2002 ....................
July 21, 2003 .........................
April 2, 2004 ..........................
April 8, 2005 ..........................
February 28, 2006 .................
April 11, 2007 ........................
March 14, 2008 .....................
Federal Register citation
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
53511
43010
17318
18244
10404
18318
13788
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
These documents, which are all final
rules setting forth the annual harvest
regulations, are available at https://
alaska.fws.gov/ambcc/regulations.htm.
Who Is Eligible To Hunt Under These
Regulations?
Eligibility to harvest under the
regulations established in 2003 was
limited to permanent residents,
regardless of race, in villages located
within the Alaska Peninsula, Kodiak
Archipelago, the Aleutian Islands and in
areas north and west of the Alaska
Range (50 CFR 92.5). These geographical
restrictions opened the initial
subsistence migratory bird harvest to
only about 13 percent of Alaska
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:43 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
residents. High-population areas such as
Anchorage, the Matanuska-Susitna and
Fairbanks North Star boroughs, the
Kenai Peninsula roaded area, the Gulf of
Alaska roaded area, and Southeast
Alaska were excluded from the eligible
subsistence harvest areas.
Based on petitions requesting
inclusion in the harvest, in 2004, we
added 13 additional communities based
on criteria set forth in 50 CFR 92.5(c).
These communities were Gulkana,
Gakona, Tazlina, Copper Center,
Mentasta Lake, Chitina, Chistochina,
Tatitlek, Chenega, Port Graham,
Nanwalek, Tyonek, and Hoonah, with a
combined population of 2,766. In 2005,
we added three additional communities
for glaucous-winged gull egg gathering
only, based on petitions requesting
inclusion. These southeastern
communities were Craig, Hydaburg, and
Yakutat, with a combined population of
2,459.
In 2007, we enacted the Alaska
Department of Fish and Game’s request
to expand the Fairbanks North Star
Borough excluded area to include the
Central Interior area. This action
excluded the following communities
from participation in this harvest: Big
Delta/Fort Greely, Healy, McKinley
Park/Village and Ferry, with a combined
population of 2,812. These removed
communities reduced the percentage of
the State population included in the
subsistence harvest to 13 percent.
How Will the Service Ensure That the
Subsistence Harvest Will Not Raise
Overall Migratory Bird Harvest or
Threaten the Conservation of
Endangered and Threatened Species?
We have monitored subsistence
harvest for the past 15 years through the
use of annual household surveys in the
most heavily used subsistence harvest
areas, e.g., the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta.
Continuation of this monitoring enables
tracking of any major changes or trends
in levels of harvest and user
participation after legalization of the
harvest. The Service has an emergency
closure provision (50 CFR 92.21), so that
if any significant increases in harvest
are documented for one or more species
in a region, an emergency closure can be
requested and implemented.
The Service will institute emergency
harvest closures in 2009 if deemed
necessary to prevent an imminent threat
to the conservation of Steller’s eiders.
Steller’s eiders are divided into Atlantic
and Pacific populations; the Pacific
population is further divided into the
Russia-breeding population along the
Russian eastern arctic coastal plain, and
the Alaska-breeding population. In
1997, the Alaska-breeding population of
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
76995
Steller’s eiders was listed as threatened
based on a substantial decrease in the
species’ breeding range in Alaska and
the resulting increased vulnerability of
the remaining Alaska-breeding
population to extirpation (62 FR 31748;
June 11, 1997).
The Alaska-breeding population of
Steller’s eiders now nests primarily only
on the Alaska Coastal Plain, particularly
around Barrow and at very low densities
from Wainwright to at least as far east
as Prudhoe Bay. A few pairs also
apparently remain on the YukonKuskokwim Delta. The apparent
reduction in breeding range in Alaska
was a major reason for listing the
Alaska-breeding population as
threatened. Although the cause of the
original decline is not known with
certainty, current threats to the recovery
of Steller’s eiders likely include
mortality from hunting, exposure to lead
shot and other contaminants such as oil,
changes in marine habitat, and nest
failure and possibly adult mortality
from avian and mammalian predators
associated with human settlements and
development. While we have made
progress working to reduce predation,
substituting steel shot for lead, and
instituting eider conservation outreach
programs, mortality from hunting
appears to be the greatest current threat.
A computer-based statistical model
was developed by scientists to predict
the prognosis for recovery or extinction
of the Alaska-breeding population of
Steller’s eider. Although there is
uncertainty surrounding the population
size, survival rate, and reproductive rate
estimates used to develop this model,
results indicate that the Alaska-breeding
population of Steller’s eiders has a very
high probability of becoming extirpated
within 10 years without immediate
concerted actions designed to reduce
adult mortality. For years with available
harvest survey data, it appears that
possibly 10 percent or more of the
Alaska-breeding population of Steller’s
eiders has been lost due to mortality
from hunting. Regulatory and
collaborative actions focused on this
threat will be necessary to ensure that
take is reduced in 2009. The Service
will institute emergency closures if the
Alaska subsistence harvest of migratory
birds is deemed to cause an imminent
threat to Steller’s eiders in a specific
geographic area during the spring
migration or the summer breeding
period.
E:\FR\FM\18DEP1.SGM
18DEP1
76996
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules
the Yakutat area. Work on this project
is under way.
Yellow-Billed Loons
At the request of the North Slope
Borough Fish and Game Management
Committee, the Co-management Council
recommended continuing into 2009 the
provisions originally established in
2005 to allow subsistence use of yellowbilled loons inadvertently entangled in
subsistence fishing (gill) nets on the
North Slope. Yellow-billed loons are
culturally important for the Inupiat
Eskimo of the North Slope for use in
traditional dance regalia. A maximum of
20 yellow-billed loons may be caught in
2009 under this provision. The intent of
this provision is not to harvest yellowbilled loons, but to allow use of those
loons inadvertently entangled during
normal subsistence fishing activities.
Individual reporting to the North Slope
Borough Department of Wildlife is
required by the end of each season. The
North Slope Borough has asked
fishermen, through announcements on
the radio and through personal contact,
to report inadvertent entanglements of
loons to better estimate the level of
mortality caused by gill nets. In 2007, 14
yellow-billed loons were reported taken
in fishing nets and an additional 2 were
released alive. This provision, to allow
subsistence possession and use of
yellow-billed loons caught in fishing gill
nets, is subject to annual review and
renewal by the SRC.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
What Is Proposed for Change in the
Region-Specific Regulations for 2009?
Steller’s Eiders
We are proposing to add local
migratory bird hunting restrictions for
the four communities of Barrow,
Wainwright, Point Lay, and Point Hope
along the North Slope of Alaska. These
proposed restrictions include instituting
shooting hours, an inspection
requirement, a road closure, and
clarification of a possession restriction.
We are proposing these restrictions in
response to the recent mortality of
Steller’s eiders on the North Slope, the
loss of nests and eggs during breeding,
and mortality likely associated with
crippling due to hunting. We are not
proposing to authorize incidental take of
Steller’s eiders.
The Service has concerns that harvest
pursuant to regulations from previous
subsistence seasons would pose an
imminent threat to the threatened
Steller’s eider. It is estimated that 19 (9–
37, 95% Confidence Limits) Steller’s
eiders were harvested on the North
Slope during the 2005 subsistence
season; the actual reported take was 9
Steller’s eiders (Co-Management
Council unpublished data, 2006). In
2008, 27 Steller’s eiders were found
dead at Barrow between June and
August 2008; of these, 74 percent were
shot. The number of Steller’s eiders
killed from Barrow to Point Hope during
the spring and summer subsistence hunt
during 2004–08 requires the Service to
develop and implement new
regulations. The Service concludes that
the subsistence hunt has resulted in an
unknown amount of shooting and
disturbance that has caused the direct
loss of nests, eggs, young, and adults in
breeding years. The Service must
attempt to eliminate the take of Steller’s
eiders resulting from the recognition
and continuation of the spring and
summer subsistence migratory bird
hunting in order to conserve and
eventually recover this species.
Of the regulations we are proposing,
the shooting hours restriction parallels
that found in 50 CFR 20.102. This
regulation will help eliminate hunting
under poor visibility to improve species
identification and reduce the probability
of mistaken shooting and crippling of
Steller’s eiders. We are proposing to
require that hunters in the field, when
asked, must present their take for
species identification to enable the
Service to monitor the harvest for take
of closed and protected species. Because
of the critical status of the Alaskabreeding Steller’s eiders (the listed
population), we need real-time, reliable
information about the take of any
Aleutian and Arctic Terns
We are proposing to open a season
May 15–June 30 for harvesting Aleutian
and arctic tern eggs in the Yakutat
Harvest area, from Icy Bay (Icy Cape to
Pt. Riou) and the coastal islands
bordering the Gulf of Alaska from Pt.
Manby southeast to and including Dry
Bay. The Yakutat Tlingit Tribe
requested this proposal, stating that this
regulation would legalize a traditional
gathering of tern eggs that has occurred
for hundreds of years. The Tlingit refer
to the terns as ‘‘sea pigeons’’ and gather
eggs for sustenance during the salmon
fishing season. ‘‘Pigeon eggs’’ are
considered a highly desired food by
many Native households in Yakutat.
Harvested eggs are shared extensively
throughout the community and
especially with local Native elders. The
Yakutat Tlingit Tribe has agreed to
monitor the harvest of tern eggs and this
summer would conduct a recall survey
of the spring harvest. The Yakutat
Ranger Station, U.S. Forest Service, in
cooperation with the Service’s Alaska
Office of Migratory Bird Management is
developing methods for monitoring the
Aleutian and arctic tern populations in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:43 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Steller’s eiders during the subsistence
season. We are proposing to clarify,
reinforce, and ensure that no person
may possess migratory bird species that
are not open for subsistence harvest. In
Barrow, we are proposing to close a 1mile buffer zone to migratory bird
hunting around specific rural roads to
protect birds from harvest and
disturbance in the primary nesting area
around Barrow. If there had been a 1mile closed buffer zone for the 2008
breeding period, it would have
protected 91 percent of Steller’s eider
nests documented.
The goal of these proposed
restrictions is to eliminate or
significantly reduce the potential impact
of the subsistence migratory bird hunt to
Steller’s eiders. In addition to the
regulations, the Service is developing
and implementing more effective hunter
training on eider identification, harvest
monitoring, law enforcement, and
outreach. In the event that some or all
of the conservation measures and
regulations are unsuccessful, and the
existing harvest is deemed to pose an
imminent threat to the conservation of
Steller’s eiders, we will apply the
emergency closure provision provided
in 50 CFR 92.21. In addition, as
discussed under ‘‘Endangered Species
Act Consideration,’’ we will consult on
these proposed regulations under
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
to ensure that they are not likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of
Steller’s eiders or any other listed
species.
Statutory Authority
We derive our authority to issue these
regulations from the Migratory Bird
Treaty Act of 1918, 16 U.S.C. 712(1),
which authorizes the Secretary of the
Interior, in accordance with the treaties
with Canada, Mexico, Japan, and Russia,
to ‘‘issue such regulations as may be
necessary to assure that the taking of
migratory birds and the collection of
their eggs, by the indigenous inhabitants
of the State of Alaska, shall be permitted
for their own nutritional and other
essential needs, as determined by the
Secretary of the Interior, during seasons
established so as to provide for the
preservation and maintenance of stocks
of migratory birds.’’
Clarity of the Rule
We are required by Executive Orders
12866 and 12988 and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1,
1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we
publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
E:\FR\FM\18DEP1.SGM
18DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. To better help us revise the
rule, your comments should be as
specific as possible. For example, you
should tell us the numbers of the
sections or paragraphs that are unclearly
written, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you feel
lists or tables would be useful, etc.
Required Determinations
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Order 12866)
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this rule is
not significant and has not reviewed
this rule under Executive Order 12866
(E.O. 12866). OMB bases its
determination upon the following four
criteria:
(a) Whether the rule will have an
annual effect of $100 million or more on
the economy or adversely affect an
economic sector, productivity, jobs, the
environment, or other units of the
government.
(b) Whether the rule will create
inconsistencies with other Federal
agencies’ actions.
(c) Whether the rule will materially
affect entitlements, grants, user fees,
loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of their recipients.
(d) Whether the rule raises novel legal
or policy issues.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
defined under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). An initial
regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. Accordingly, a Small Entity
Compliance Guide is not required. The
rule legalizes a pre-existing subsistence
activity, and the resources harvested
will be consumed by the harvesters or
persons within their local community.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
(a) Will not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more. It
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:43 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
will legalize and regulate a traditional
subsistence activity. It will not result in
a substantial increase in subsistence
harvest or a significant change in
harvesting patterns. The commodities
being regulated under this rule are
migratory birds. This rule deals with
legalizing the subsistence harvest of
migratory birds and, as such, does not
involve commodities traded in the
marketplace. A small economic benefit
from this rule derives from the sale of
equipment and ammunition to carry out
subsistence hunting. Most, if not all,
businesses that sell hunting equipment
in rural Alaska would qualify as small
businesses. We have no reason to
believe that this rule will lead to a
disproportionate distribution of
benefits.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers;
individual industries; Federal, State, or
local government agencies; or
geographic regions. This rule does not
deal with traded commodities and,
therefore, does not have an impact on
prices for consumers.
(c) Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
This rule deals with the harvesting of
wildlife for personal consumption. It
does not regulate the marketplace in any
way to generate effects on the economy
or the ability of businesses to compete.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
We have determined and certified
under the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) that this rule
will not impose a cost of $100 million
or more in any given year on local,
State, or tribal governments or private
entities. The rule does not have a
significant or unique effect on State,
local, or tribal governments or the
private sector. A statement containing
the information required by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act is not
required. Participation on regional
management bodies and the Comanagement Council will require travel
expenses for some Alaska Native
organizations and local governments. In
addition, they will assume some
expenses related to coordinating
involvement of village councils in the
regulatory process. Total coordination
and travel expenses for all Alaska
Native organizations are estimated to be
less than $300,000 per year. In the
Notice of Decision (65 FR 16405; March
28, 2000), we identified 12 partner
organizations (Alaska Native nonprofits
and local governments) to administer
the regional programs. The Alaska
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
76997
Department of Fish and Game will also
incur expenses for travel to Comanagement Council and regional
management body meetings. In
addition, the State of Alaska will be
required to provide technical staff
support to each of the regional
management bodies and to the Comanagement Council. Expenses for the
State’s involvement may exceed
$100,000 per year, but should not
exceed $150,000 per year. When
funding permits, we make annual grant
agreements available to the partner
organizations and the Alaska
Department of Fish and Game to help
offset their expenses.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
Under the criteria in Executive Order
12630, this rule does not have
significant takings implications. This
rule is not specific to particular land
ownership, but applies to the harvesting
of migratory bird resources throughout
Alaska. A takings implication
assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in Executive Order
13132, this rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
We discuss effects of this proposed rule
on the State of Alaska in the Executive
Order 12866 and Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act sections above. We worked
with the State of Alaska to develop
these proposed regulations. Therefore, a
Federalism Assessment is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
The Department, in promulgating this
rule, has determined that it will not
unduly burden the judicial system and
that it meets the requirements of
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988.
Government-to-Government Relations
With Native American Tribal
Governments
In accordance with the President’s
memorandum of April 29, 1994,
‘‘Government-to-Government Relations
With Native American Tribal
Governments’’ (59 FR 22951), and
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249;
November 6, 2000), concerning
consultation and coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, we have
consulted with Alaska tribes and
evaluated the rule for possible effects on
tribes or trust resources, and have
determined that there are no significant
effects. The rule will legally recognize
the subsistence harvest of migratory
birds and their eggs for tribal members,
E:\FR\FM\18DEP1.SGM
18DEP1
76998
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules
as well as for other indigenous
inhabitants.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule has been examined under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
and has been found to contain no
information collection requirements. We
have, however, received OMB approval
of associated voluntary annual
household surveys used to determine
levels of subsistence take. The OMB
control number for the information
collection is 1018–0124, which expires
on January 31, 2010. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor and a person is not
required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Endangered Species Act Consideration
Prior to issuance of annual spring and
summer subsistence regulations, we will
consult under section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531–1543;
hereinafter the Act), to ensure that the
2009 subsistence harvest is not likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of
any species designated as endangered or
threatened, or modify or destroy its
critical habitats, and that the regulations
are consistent with conservation
programs for those species. Consultation
under section 7 of the Act for the annual
subsistence take regulations may cause
us to change these regulations. Our
biological opinion resulting from the
section 7 consultation is a public
document available from the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
National Environmental Policy Act
Consideration
The annual regulations and options
were considered in the Environmental
Assessment, ‘‘Managing Migratory Bird
Subsistence Hunting in Alaska: Hunting
Regulations for the 2009 Spring/
Summer Harvest,’’ issued December 12,
2008. Copies are available from the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
(Executive Order 13211)
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 on regulations
that significantly affect energy supply,
distribution, and use. Executive Order
13211 requires agencies to prepare
Statements of Energy Effects when
undertaking certain actions. This is not
a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866; it would allow
only for traditional subsistence harvest
and would improve conservation of
migratory birds by allowing effective
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:43 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
regulation of this harvest. Further, this
rule is not expected to significantly
affect energy supplies, distribution, or
use. Therefore, this action is not a
significant energy action under
Executive Order 13211 and no
Statement of Energy Effects is required.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 92
Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Subsistence, Treaties, Wildlife.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, we propose to amend title 50,
chapter I, subchapter G, of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 92—MIGRATORY BIRD
SUBSISTENCE HARVEST IN ALASKA
1. The authority citation for part 92
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 703–712.
Subpart D—Annual Regulations
Governing Subsistence Harvest
2. In subpart D, add § 92.31 to read as
follows:
§ 92.31
Region-specific regulations.
The 2009 season dates for the eligible
subsistence harvest areas are as follows:
(a) Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Region.
(1) Northern Unit (Pribilof Islands):
(i) Season: April 2–June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1–August 31.
(2) Central Unit (Aleut Region’s
eastern boundary on the Alaska
Peninsula westward to and including
Unalaska Island):
(i) Season: April 2–June 15 and July
16–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 16–July 15.
(iii) Special Black Brant Season
Closure: August 16–August 31, only in
Izembek and Moffet lagoons.
(iv) Special Tundra Swan Closure: All
hunting and egg gathering closed in
units 9(D) and 10.
(3) Western Unit (Umnak Island west
to and including Attu Island):
(i) Season: April 2–July 15 and August
16–August 31.
(ii) Closure: July 16-August 15.
(b) Yukon/Kuskokwim Delta Region.
(1) Season: April 2–August 31.
(2) Closure: 30-day closure dates to be
announced by the Service’s Alaska
Regional Director or his designee, after
consultation with local subsistence
users, field biologists, and the
Association of Village Council
President’s Waterfowl Conservation
Committee. This 30-day period will
occur between June 1 and August 15 of
each year. A press release announcing
the actual closure dates will be
forwarded to regional newspapers and
radio and television stations and posted
in village post offices and stores.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(3) Special Black Brant and Cackling
Goose Season Hunting Closure: From
the period when egg laying begins until
young birds are fledged. Closure dates to
be announced by the Service’s Alaska
Regional Director or his designee, after
consultation with field biologists and
the Association of Village Council
President’s Waterfowl Conservation
Committee. A press release announcing
the actual closure dates will be
forwarded to regional newspapers and
radio and television stations and posted
in village post offices and stores.
(c) Bristol Bay Region.
(1) Season: April 2–June 14 and July
16–August 31 (general season); April 2–
July 15 for seabird egg gathering only.
(2) Closure: June 15–July 15 (general
season); July 16–August 31 (seabird egg
gathering).
(d) Bering Strait/Norton Sound
Region.
(1) Stebbins/St. Michael Area (Point
Romanof to Canal Point):
(i) Season: April 15–June 14 and July
16–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 15–July 15.
(2) Remainder of the region:
(i) Season: April 2–June 14 and July
16–August 31 for waterfowl; April 2–
July 19 and August 21–August 31 for all
other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 15–July 15 for
waterfowl; July 20–August 20 for all
other birds.
(e) Kodiak Archipelago Region, except
for the Kodiak Island roaded area,
which is closed to the harvesting of
migratory birds and their eggs. The
closed area consists of all lands and
waters (including exposed tidelands)
east of a line extending from Crag Point
in the north to the west end of Saltery
Cove in the south and all lands and
water south of a line extending from
Termination Point along the north side
of Cascade Lake extending to Anton
Larson Bay. Waters adjacent to the
closed area are closed to harvest within
500 feet from the water’s edge. The
offshore islands are open to harvest.
(1) Season: April 2–June 30 and July
31–August 31 for seabirds; April 2–June
20 and July 22–August 31 for all other
birds.
(2) Closure: July 1–July 30 for
seabirds; June 21–July 21 for all other
birds.
(f) Northwest Arctic Region.
(1) Season: April 2–June 9 and August
15–August 31 (hunting in general);
waterfowl egg gathering May 20–June 9
only; seabird egg gathering May 20–July
12 only; hunting molting/non-nesting
waterfowl July 1–July 31 only.
(2) Closure: June 10–August 14,
except for the taking of seabird eggs and
molting/non-nesting waterfowl as
E:\FR\FM\18DEP1.SGM
18DEP1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules
provided in paragraph (f)(1) of this
section.
(g) North Slope Region.
(1) Southern Unit (Southwestern
North Slope regional boundary east to
Peard Bay, everything west of the
longitude line 158°30′W and south of
the latitude line 70°45′N to the west
bank of the Ikpikpuk River, and
everything south of the latitude line
69°45′N between the west bank of the
Ikpikpuk River to the east bank of
Sagavinirktok River):
(i) Season: April 2–June 29 and July
30–August 31 for seabirds; April 2–June
19 and July 20–August 31 for all other
birds.
(ii) Closure: June 30–July 29 for
seabirds; June 20–July 19 for all other
birds.
(iii) Special Black Brant Hunting
Opening: From June 20–July 5. The
open area would consist of the
coastline, from mean high water line
outward to include open water, from
Nokotlek Point east to longitude line
158°30′W. This includes Peard Bay,
Kugrua Bay, and Wainwright Inlet, but
not the Kuk and Kugrua river drainages.
(2) Northern Unit (At Peard Bay,
everything east of the longitude line
158°30′W and north of the latitude line
70°45′N to west bank of the Ikpikpuk
River, and everything north of the
latitude line 69°45′N between the west
bank of the Ikpikpuk River to the east
bank of Sagavinirktok River):
(i) Season: April 6–June 6 and July 7–
August 31 for king and common eiders;
April 2–June 15 and July 16–August 31
for all other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 7–July 6 for king and
common eiders; June 16–July 15 for all
other birds.
(iii) Special Hunting Restrictions for
Barrow: Migratory bird hunting is not
permitted within 1 mile of either side or
end of Cakeeater/Gaswell, Nunavak and
Freshwater Lake roads and any spur
roads.
(3) Eastern Unit (East of eastern bank
of the Sagavanirktok River):
(i) Season: April 2–June 19 and July
20–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 20–July 19.
(4) All Units: yellow-billed loons.
Annually, up to 20 yellow-billed loons
total for the region may be inadvertently
entangled in subsistence fishing nets in
the North Slope Region and kept for
subsistence use. Individuals must report
each yellow-billed loon inadvertently
entangled while subsistence gill net
fishing to the North Slope Borough
Department of Wildlife Management by
the end of the season.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:43 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
(5) North Coastal Zone (Cape
Thompson north to Point Hope and east
along the Arctic Ocean coastline around
Point Barrow to Ross Point, including
Iko Bay, and 5 miles inland).
(i) Migratory bird hunting is permitted
from one-half hour before sunrise until
sunset.
(ii) No person shall at any time, by
any means, or in any manner, possess or
have in custody any migratory bird or
part thereof, taken in violation of
subpart C and D of this part.
(iii) Upon request from a Service law
enforcement officer, hunters taking,
attempting to take, or transporting
migratory birds taken during the
subsistence harvest season must present
them to the officer for species
identification.
(h) Interior Region.
(1) Season: April 2–June 14 and July
16–August 31; egg gathering May 1–June
14 only.
(2) Closure: June 15–July 15.
(i) Upper Copper River Region
(Harvest Area: Units 11 and 13) (Eligible
communities: Gulkana, Chitina, Tazlina,
Copper Center, Gakona, Mentasta Lake,
Chistochina and Cantwell).
(1) Season: April 15–May 26 and June
27–August 31.
(2) Closure: May 27–June 26.
(3) The Copper River Basin
communities listed above also
documented traditional use harvesting
birds in Unit 12, making them eligible
to hunt in this unit using the seasons
specified in paragraph (h) of this
section.
(j) Gulf of Alaska Region.
(1) Prince William Sound Area
(Harvest area: Unit 6 [D]), (Eligible
Chugach communities: Chenega Bay,
Tatitlek).
(i) Season: April 2–May 31 and July
1–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 1–30.
(2) Kachemak Bay Area (Harvest area:
Unit 15[C] South of a line connecting
the tip of Homer Spit to the mouth of
Fox River) (Eligible Chugach
Communities: Port Graham, Nanwalek).
(i) Season: April 2–May 31 and July
1–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 1–30.
(k) Cook Inlet (Harvest area: portions
of Unit 16[B] as specified below)
(Eligible communities: Tyonek only).
(1) Season: April 2–May 31—That
portion of Unit 16(B) south of the
Skwentna River and west of the Yentna
River, and August 1–31—That portion
of Unit 16(B) south of the Beluga River,
Beluga Lake, and the Triumvirate
Glacier.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
76999
(2) Closure: June 1–July 31.
(l) Southeast Alaska.
(1) Community of Hoonah (Harvest
area: National Forest lands in Icy Strait
and Cross Sound, including Middle Pass
Rock near the Inian Islands, Table Rock
in Cross Sound, and other traditional
locations on the coast of Yakobi Island.
The land and waters of Glacier Bay
National Park remain closed to all
subsistence harvesting [50 CFR 100.3].
(i) Season: Glaucous-winged gull egg
gathering only: May 15–June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1–August 31.
(2) Communities of Craig and
Hydaburg (Harvest area: Small islands
and adjacent shoreline of western Prince
of Wales Island from Point Baker to
Cape Chacon, but also including
Coronation and Warren islands).
(i) Season: Glaucous-winged gull egg
gathering only: May 15–June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1–August 31.
(3) Community of Yakutat (Harvest
area: Icy Bay [Icy Cape to Pt. Riou], and
coastal lands and islands bordering the
Gulf of Alaska from Pt. Manby southeast
to Dry Bay).
(i) Season: Glaucous-winged gull,
aleutian and arctic tern egg gathering:
May 15–June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1–August 31.
3. In subpart D, add § 92.32 to read as
follows:
§ 92.32 Emergency regulations to protect
Steller’s eiders.
Upon finding that continuation of
these subsistence regulations would
pose an imminent threat to the
conservation of threatened Steller’s
eiders, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service Alaska Regional Director, in
consultation with the Co-management
Council, will immediately under § 92.21
take action as is necessary to prevent
further take. Regulation changes
implemented could range from a
temporary closure of duck hunting in a
small geographic area to large-scale
regional or State-wide long-term
closures of all subsistence migratory
bird hunting. Such closures or
temporary suspensions will remain in
effect until the Regional Director, in
consultation with the Co-management
Council, determines that the potential
for additional Steller’s eiders to be taken
no longer exists.
Dated: December 10, 2008.
Lyle Laverty,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and
Parks.
[FR Doc. E8–30081 Filed 12–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\18DEP1.SGM
18DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 244 (Thursday, December 18, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76994-76999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-30081]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 92
[FWS-R7-MB-2008-0099; 91200-1231-9BPP L2]
RIN 1018-AW29
Migratory Bird Subsistence Harvest in Alaska; Harvest Regulations
for Migratory Birds in Alaska During the 2009 Season
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or we) proposes
migratory bird subsistence harvest regulations in Alaska for the 2009
season. The proposed regulations would enable the continuation of
customary and traditional subsistence uses of migratory birds in Alaska
and prescribe regional information on when and where the harvesting of
birds may occur. These proposed regulations were developed under a co-
management process involving the Service, the Alaska Department of Fish
and Game, and Alaska Native representatives. The rulemaking is
necessary because the regulations governing the subsistence harvest of
migratory birds in Alaska are subject to annual review. This rulemaking
proposes region-specific regulations that would go into effect on April
2, 2009, and expire on August 31, 2009.
DATES: We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before
January 20, 2009. We must receive requests for public hearings, in
writing, at the address shown in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by
February 2, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public Comments Processing,
Attn: RIN 1018-AW29, Division of Policy and Directives Management, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 222, Arlington,
VA 22203.
We will not accept e-mail or faxes. We will post all comments on
https://www.regulations.gov. This generally means that we will post any
personal information you provide us (see the Public Comments section
below for more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Armstrong, (907) 786-3887, or
Donna Dewhurst, (907) 786-3499, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1011 E.
Tudor Road, Mail Stop 201, Anchorage, AK 99503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comments
You may submit your comments and materials concerning this proposed
rule by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. We will not
accept comments sent by e-mail or fax or to an address not listed in
the ADDRESSES section. We will not consider hand-delivered comments
that we do not receive, or mailed comments that are not postmarked, by
the date specified in the DATES section.
We will post your entire comment--including your personal
identifying information--on https://www.regulations.gov. If you provide
personal identifying information in your comment, you may request at
the top of your document that we withhold this information from public
review. However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Comments and materials we receive, as well as supporting
documentation we used in preparing this proposed rule, will be
available for public inspection on https://www.regulations.gov, or by
[[Page 76995]]
appointment, during normal business hours, at the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Office of the Alaska Migratory Bird Co-management
Council, 1011 E. Tudor Rd., Anchorage, AK 99503, (877) 229-2344.
Why Is This Current Rulemaking Necessary?
This current rulemaking is necessary because, by law, the migratory
bird harvest season is closed unless opened by the Secretary of the
Interior, and the regulations governing subsistence harvest of
migratory birds in Alaska are subject to public review and annual
approval. The Alaska Migratory Bird Co-management Council (Co-
management Council) held a meeting in April 2008 to develop
recommendations for changes effective for the 2009 harvest season.
These recommendations were presented to the Service Regulations
Committee (SRC) on July 30 and 31, 2008, and were approved.
This rule proposes regulations for the taking of migratory birds
for subsistence uses in Alaska during 2009. This rule lists migratory
bird season openings and closures by region.
How Do I Find the History of These Regulations?
Background information, including past events leading to this
action, accomplishments since the Migratory Bird Treaties with Canada
and Mexico were amended, and a history addressing conservation issues
can be found in the following Federal Register documents:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Federal Register citation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
August 16, 2002.......................... 67 FR 53511
July 21, 2003............................ 68 FR 43010
April 2, 2004............................ 69 FR 17318
April 8, 2005............................ 70 FR 18244
February 28, 2006........................ 71 FR 10404
April 11, 2007........................... 72 FR 18318
March 14, 2008........................... 73 FR 13788
------------------------------------------------------------------------
These documents, which are all final rules setting forth the annual
harvest regulations, are available at https://alaska.fws.gov/ambcc/
regulations.htm.
Who Is Eligible To Hunt Under These Regulations?
Eligibility to harvest under the regulations established in 2003
was limited to permanent residents, regardless of race, in villages
located within the Alaska Peninsula, Kodiak Archipelago, the Aleutian
Islands and in areas north and west of the Alaska Range (50 CFR 92.5).
These geographical restrictions opened the initial subsistence
migratory bird harvest to only about 13 percent of Alaska residents.
High-population areas such as Anchorage, the Matanuska-Susitna and
Fairbanks North Star boroughs, the Kenai Peninsula roaded area, the
Gulf of Alaska roaded area, and Southeast Alaska were excluded from the
eligible subsistence harvest areas.
Based on petitions requesting inclusion in the harvest, in 2004, we
added 13 additional communities based on criteria set forth in 50 CFR
92.5(c). These communities were Gulkana, Gakona, Tazlina, Copper
Center, Mentasta Lake, Chitina, Chistochina, Tatitlek, Chenega, Port
Graham, Nanwalek, Tyonek, and Hoonah, with a combined population of
2,766. In 2005, we added three additional communities for glaucous-
winged gull egg gathering only, based on petitions requesting
inclusion. These southeastern communities were Craig, Hydaburg, and
Yakutat, with a combined population of 2,459.
In 2007, we enacted the Alaska Department of Fish and Game's
request to expand the Fairbanks North Star Borough excluded area to
include the Central Interior area. This action excluded the following
communities from participation in this harvest: Big Delta/Fort Greely,
Healy, McKinley Park/Village and Ferry, with a combined population of
2,812. These removed communities reduced the percentage of the State
population included in the subsistence harvest to 13 percent.
How Will the Service Ensure That the Subsistence Harvest Will Not Raise
Overall Migratory Bird Harvest or Threaten the Conservation of
Endangered and Threatened Species?
We have monitored subsistence harvest for the past 15 years through
the use of annual household surveys in the most heavily used
subsistence harvest areas, e.g., the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta.
Continuation of this monitoring enables tracking of any major changes
or trends in levels of harvest and user participation after
legalization of the harvest. The Service has an emergency closure
provision (50 CFR 92.21), so that if any significant increases in
harvest are documented for one or more species in a region, an
emergency closure can be requested and implemented.
The Service will institute emergency harvest closures in 2009 if
deemed necessary to prevent an imminent threat to the conservation of
Steller's eiders. Steller's eiders are divided into Atlantic and
Pacific populations; the Pacific population is further divided into the
Russia-breeding population along the Russian eastern arctic coastal
plain, and the Alaska-breeding population. In 1997, the Alaska-breeding
population of Steller's eiders was listed as threatened based on a
substantial decrease in the species' breeding range in Alaska and the
resulting increased vulnerability of the remaining Alaska-breeding
population to extirpation (62 FR 31748; June 11, 1997).
The Alaska-breeding population of Steller's eiders now nests
primarily only on the Alaska Coastal Plain, particularly around Barrow
and at very low densities from Wainwright to at least as far east as
Prudhoe Bay. A few pairs also apparently remain on the Yukon-Kuskokwim
Delta. The apparent reduction in breeding range in Alaska was a major
reason for listing the Alaska-breeding population as threatened.
Although the cause of the original decline is not known with certainty,
current threats to the recovery of Steller's eiders likely include
mortality from hunting, exposure to lead shot and other contaminants
such as oil, changes in marine habitat, and nest failure and possibly
adult mortality from avian and mammalian predators associated with
human settlements and development. While we have made progress working
to reduce predation, substituting steel shot for lead, and instituting
eider conservation outreach programs, mortality from hunting appears to
be the greatest current threat.
A computer-based statistical model was developed by scientists to
predict the prognosis for recovery or extinction of the Alaska-breeding
population of Steller's eider. Although there is uncertainty
surrounding the population size, survival rate, and reproductive rate
estimates used to develop this model, results indicate that the Alaska-
breeding population of Steller's eiders has a very high probability of
becoming extirpated within 10 years without immediate concerted actions
designed to reduce adult mortality. For years with available harvest
survey data, it appears that possibly 10 percent or more of the Alaska-
breeding population of Steller's eiders has been lost due to mortality
from hunting. Regulatory and collaborative actions focused on this
threat will be necessary to ensure that take is reduced in 2009. The
Service will institute emergency closures if the Alaska subsistence
harvest of migratory birds is deemed to cause an imminent threat to
Steller's eiders in a specific geographic area during the spring
migration or the summer breeding period.
[[Page 76996]]
What Is Proposed for Change in the Region-Specific Regulations for
2009?
Yellow-Billed Loons
At the request of the North Slope Borough Fish and Game Management
Committee, the Co-management Council recommended continuing into 2009
the provisions originally established in 2005 to allow subsistence use
of yellow-billed loons inadvertently entangled in subsistence fishing
(gill) nets on the North Slope. Yellow-billed loons are culturally
important for the Inupiat Eskimo of the North Slope for use in
traditional dance regalia. A maximum of 20 yellow-billed loons may be
caught in 2009 under this provision. The intent of this provision is
not to harvest yellow-billed loons, but to allow use of those loons
inadvertently entangled during normal subsistence fishing activities.
Individual reporting to the North Slope Borough Department of Wildlife
is required by the end of each season. The North Slope Borough has
asked fishermen, through announcements on the radio and through
personal contact, to report inadvertent entanglements of loons to
better estimate the level of mortality caused by gill nets. In 2007, 14
yellow-billed loons were reported taken in fishing nets and an
additional 2 were released alive. This provision, to allow subsistence
possession and use of yellow-billed loons caught in fishing gill nets,
is subject to annual review and renewal by the SRC.
Aleutian and Arctic Terns
We are proposing to open a season May 15-June 30 for harvesting
Aleutian and arctic tern eggs in the Yakutat Harvest area, from Icy Bay
(Icy Cape to Pt. Riou) and the coastal islands bordering the Gulf of
Alaska from Pt. Manby southeast to and including Dry Bay. The Yakutat
Tlingit Tribe requested this proposal, stating that this regulation
would legalize a traditional gathering of tern eggs that has occurred
for hundreds of years. The Tlingit refer to the terns as ``sea
pigeons'' and gather eggs for sustenance during the salmon fishing
season. ``Pigeon eggs'' are considered a highly desired food by many
Native households in Yakutat. Harvested eggs are shared extensively
throughout the community and especially with local Native elders. The
Yakutat Tlingit Tribe has agreed to monitor the harvest of tern eggs
and this summer would conduct a recall survey of the spring harvest.
The Yakutat Ranger Station, U.S. Forest Service, in cooperation with
the Service's Alaska Office of Migratory Bird Management is developing
methods for monitoring the Aleutian and arctic tern populations in the
Yakutat area. Work on this project is under way.
Steller's Eiders
We are proposing to add local migratory bird hunting restrictions
for the four communities of Barrow, Wainwright, Point Lay, and Point
Hope along the North Slope of Alaska. These proposed restrictions
include instituting shooting hours, an inspection requirement, a road
closure, and clarification of a possession restriction. We are
proposing these restrictions in response to the recent mortality of
Steller's eiders on the North Slope, the loss of nests and eggs during
breeding, and mortality likely associated with crippling due to
hunting. We are not proposing to authorize incidental take of Steller's
eiders.
The Service has concerns that harvest pursuant to regulations from
previous subsistence seasons would pose an imminent threat to the
threatened Steller's eider. It is estimated that 19 (9-37, 95%
Confidence Limits) Steller's eiders were harvested on the North Slope
during the 2005 subsistence season; the actual reported take was 9
Steller's eiders (Co-Management Council unpublished data, 2006). In
2008, 27 Steller's eiders were found dead at Barrow between June and
August 2008; of these, 74 percent were shot. The number of Steller's
eiders killed from Barrow to Point Hope during the spring and summer
subsistence hunt during 2004-08 requires the Service to develop and
implement new regulations. The Service concludes that the subsistence
hunt has resulted in an unknown amount of shooting and disturbance that
has caused the direct loss of nests, eggs, young, and adults in
breeding years. The Service must attempt to eliminate the take of
Steller's eiders resulting from the recognition and continuation of the
spring and summer subsistence migratory bird hunting in order to
conserve and eventually recover this species.
Of the regulations we are proposing, the shooting hours restriction
parallels that found in 50 CFR 20.102. This regulation will help
eliminate hunting under poor visibility to improve species
identification and reduce the probability of mistaken shooting and
crippling of Steller's eiders. We are proposing to require that hunters
in the field, when asked, must present their take for species
identification to enable the Service to monitor the harvest for take of
closed and protected species. Because of the critical status of the
Alaska-breeding Steller's eiders (the listed population), we need real-
time, reliable information about the take of any Steller's eiders
during the subsistence season. We are proposing to clarify, reinforce,
and ensure that no person may possess migratory bird species that are
not open for subsistence harvest. In Barrow, we are proposing to close
a 1-mile buffer zone to migratory bird hunting around specific rural
roads to protect birds from harvest and disturbance in the primary
nesting area around Barrow. If there had been a 1-mile closed buffer
zone for the 2008 breeding period, it would have protected 91 percent
of Steller's eider nests documented.
The goal of these proposed restrictions is to eliminate or
significantly reduce the potential impact of the subsistence migratory
bird hunt to Steller's eiders. In addition to the regulations, the
Service is developing and implementing more effective hunter training
on eider identification, harvest monitoring, law enforcement, and
outreach. In the event that some or all of the conservation measures
and regulations are unsuccessful, and the existing harvest is deemed to
pose an imminent threat to the conservation of Steller's eiders, we
will apply the emergency closure provision provided in 50 CFR 92.21. In
addition, as discussed under ``Endangered Species Act Consideration,''
we will consult on these proposed regulations under Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act to ensure that they are not likely to jeopardize
the continued existence of Steller's eiders or any other listed
species.
Statutory Authority
We derive our authority to issue these regulations from the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, 16 U.S.C. 712(1), which authorizes
the Secretary of the Interior, in accordance with the treaties with
Canada, Mexico, Japan, and Russia, to ``issue such regulations as may
be necessary to assure that the taking of migratory birds and the
collection of their eggs, by the indigenous inhabitants of the State of
Alaska, shall be permitted for their own nutritional and other
essential needs, as determined by the Secretary of the Interior, during
seasons established so as to provide for the preservation and
maintenance of stocks of migratory birds.''
Clarity of the Rule
We are required by Executive Orders 12866 and 12988 and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
[[Page 76997]]
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To
better help us revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as
possible. For example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections
or paragraphs that are unclearly written, which sections or sentences
are too long, the sections where you feel lists or tables would be
useful, etc.
Required Determinations
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Order 12866)
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this
rule is not significant and has not reviewed this rule under Executive
Order 12866 (E.O. 12866). OMB bases its determination upon the
following four criteria:
(a) Whether the rule will have an annual effect of $100 million or
more on the economy or adversely affect an economic sector,
productivity, jobs, the environment, or other units of the government.
(b) Whether the rule will create inconsistencies with other Federal
agencies' actions.
(c) Whether the rule will materially affect entitlements, grants,
user fees, loan programs, or the rights and obligations of their
recipients.
(d) Whether the rule raises novel legal or policy issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). An initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
Accordingly, a Small Entity Compliance Guide is not required. The rule
legalizes a pre-existing subsistence activity, and the resources
harvested will be consumed by the harvesters or persons within their
local community.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
(a) Will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more. It will legalize and regulate a traditional subsistence
activity. It will not result in a substantial increase in subsistence
harvest or a significant change in harvesting patterns. The commodities
being regulated under this rule are migratory birds. This rule deals
with legalizing the subsistence harvest of migratory birds and, as
such, does not involve commodities traded in the marketplace. A small
economic benefit from this rule derives from the sale of equipment and
ammunition to carry out subsistence hunting. Most, if not all,
businesses that sell hunting equipment in rural Alaska would qualify as
small businesses. We have no reason to believe that this rule will lead
to a disproportionate distribution of benefits.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers; individual industries; Federal, State, or local government
agencies; or geographic regions. This rule does not deal with traded
commodities and, therefore, does not have an impact on prices for
consumers.
(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. This
rule deals with the harvesting of wildlife for personal consumption. It
does not regulate the marketplace in any way to generate effects on the
economy or the ability of businesses to compete.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
We have determined and certified under the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) that this rule will not impose a cost of
$100 million or more in any given year on local, State, or tribal
governments or private entities. The rule does not have a significant
or unique effect on State, local, or tribal governments or the private
sector. A statement containing the information required by the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act is not required. Participation on regional
management bodies and the Co-management Council will require travel
expenses for some Alaska Native organizations and local governments. In
addition, they will assume some expenses related to coordinating
involvement of village councils in the regulatory process. Total
coordination and travel expenses for all Alaska Native organizations
are estimated to be less than $300,000 per year. In the Notice of
Decision (65 FR 16405; March 28, 2000), we identified 12 partner
organizations (Alaska Native nonprofits and local governments) to
administer the regional programs. The Alaska Department of Fish and
Game will also incur expenses for travel to Co-management Council and
regional management body meetings. In addition, the State of Alaska
will be required to provide technical staff support to each of the
regional management bodies and to the Co-management Council. Expenses
for the State's involvement may exceed $100,000 per year, but should
not exceed $150,000 per year. When funding permits, we make annual
grant agreements available to the partner organizations and the Alaska
Department of Fish and Game to help offset their expenses.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
Under the criteria in Executive Order 12630, this rule does not
have significant takings implications. This rule is not specific to
particular land ownership, but applies to the harvesting of migratory
bird resources throughout Alaska. A takings implication assessment is
not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in Executive Order 13132, this rule does not
have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment. We discuss effects of this proposed rule on the
State of Alaska in the Executive Order 12866 and Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act sections above. We worked with the State of Alaska to
develop these proposed regulations. Therefore, a Federalism Assessment
is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
The Department, in promulgating this rule, has determined that it
will not unduly burden the judicial system and that it meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Government-to-Government Relations With Native American Tribal
Governments
In accordance with the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994,
``Government-to-Government Relations With Native American Tribal
Governments'' (59 FR 22951), and Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249;
November 6, 2000), concerning consultation and coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments, we have consulted with Alaska tribes and evaluated
the rule for possible effects on tribes or trust resources, and have
determined that there are no significant effects. The rule will legally
recognize the subsistence harvest of migratory birds and their eggs for
tribal members,
[[Page 76998]]
as well as for other indigenous inhabitants.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule has been examined under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 and has been found to contain no information collection
requirements. We have, however, received OMB approval of associated
voluntary annual household surveys used to determine levels of
subsistence take. The OMB control number for the information collection
is 1018-0124, which expires on January 31, 2010. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
Endangered Species Act Consideration
Prior to issuance of annual spring and summer subsistence
regulations, we will consult under section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543; hereinafter the Act), to
ensure that the 2009 subsistence harvest is not likely to jeopardize
the continued existence of any species designated as endangered or
threatened, or modify or destroy its critical habitats, and that the
regulations are consistent with conservation programs for those
species. Consultation under section 7 of the Act for the annual
subsistence take regulations may cause us to change these regulations.
Our biological opinion resulting from the section 7 consultation is a
public document available from the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
National Environmental Policy Act Consideration
The annual regulations and options were considered in the
Environmental Assessment, ``Managing Migratory Bird Subsistence Hunting
in Alaska: Hunting Regulations for the 2009 Spring/Summer Harvest,''
issued December 12, 2008. Copies are available from the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (Executive Order 13211)
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 on
regulations that significantly affect energy supply, distribution, and
use. Executive Order 13211 requires agencies to prepare Statements of
Energy Effects when undertaking certain actions. This is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866; it would
allow only for traditional subsistence harvest and would improve
conservation of migratory birds by allowing effective regulation of
this harvest. Further, this rule is not expected to significantly
affect energy supplies, distribution, or use. Therefore, this action is
not a significant energy action under Executive Order 13211 and no
Statement of Energy Effects is required.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 92
Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Subsistence, Treaties, Wildlife.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, we propose to amend title
50, chapter I, subchapter G, of the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 92--MIGRATORY BIRD SUBSISTENCE HARVEST IN ALASKA
1. The authority citation for part 92 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 703-712.
Subpart D--Annual Regulations Governing Subsistence Harvest
2. In subpart D, add Sec. 92.31 to read as follows:
Sec. 92.31 Region-specific regulations.
The 2009 season dates for the eligible subsistence harvest areas
are as follows:
(a) Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Region.
(1) Northern Unit (Pribilof Islands):
(i) Season: April 2-June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.
(2) Central Unit (Aleut Region's eastern boundary on the Alaska
Peninsula westward to and including Unalaska Island):
(i) Season: April 2-June 15 and July 16-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 16-July 15.
(iii) Special Black Brant Season Closure: August 16-August 31, only
in Izembek and Moffet lagoons.
(iv) Special Tundra Swan Closure: All hunting and egg gathering
closed in units 9(D) and 10.
(3) Western Unit (Umnak Island west to and including Attu Island):
(i) Season: April 2-July 15 and August 16-August 31.
(ii) Closure: July 16-August 15.
(b) Yukon/Kuskokwim Delta Region.
(1) Season: April 2-August 31.
(2) Closure: 30-day closure dates to be announced by the Service's
Alaska Regional Director or his designee, after consultation with local
subsistence users, field biologists, and the Association of Village
Council President's Waterfowl Conservation Committee. This 30-day
period will occur between June 1 and August 15 of each year. A press
release announcing the actual closure dates will be forwarded to
regional newspapers and radio and television stations and posted in
village post offices and stores.
(3) Special Black Brant and Cackling Goose Season Hunting Closure:
From the period when egg laying begins until young birds are fledged.
Closure dates to be announced by the Service's Alaska Regional Director
or his designee, after consultation with field biologists and the
Association of Village Council President's Waterfowl Conservation
Committee. A press release announcing the actual closure dates will be
forwarded to regional newspapers and radio and television stations and
posted in village post offices and stores.
(c) Bristol Bay Region.
(1) Season: April 2-June 14 and July 16-August 31 (general season);
April 2-July 15 for seabird egg gathering only.
(2) Closure: June 15-July 15 (general season); July 16-August 31
(seabird egg gathering).
(d) Bering Strait/Norton Sound Region.
(1) Stebbins/St. Michael Area (Point Romanof to Canal Point):
(i) Season: April 15-June 14 and July 16-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 15-July 15.
(2) Remainder of the region:
(i) Season: April 2-June 14 and July 16-August 31 for waterfowl;
April 2-July 19 and August 21-August 31 for all other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 15-July 15 for waterfowl; July 20-August 20 for
all other birds.
(e) Kodiak Archipelago Region, except for the Kodiak Island roaded
area, which is closed to the harvesting of migratory birds and their
eggs. The closed area consists of all lands and waters (including
exposed tidelands) east of a line extending from Crag Point in the
north to the west end of Saltery Cove in the south and all lands and
water south of a line extending from Termination Point along the north
side of Cascade Lake extending to Anton Larson Bay. Waters adjacent to
the closed area are closed to harvest within 500 feet from the water's
edge. The offshore islands are open to harvest.
(1) Season: April 2-June 30 and July 31-August 31 for seabirds;
April 2-June 20 and July 22-August 31 for all other birds.
(2) Closure: July 1-July 30 for seabirds; June 21-July 21 for all
other birds.
(f) Northwest Arctic Region.
(1) Season: April 2-June 9 and August 15-August 31 (hunting in
general); waterfowl egg gathering May 20-June 9 only; seabird egg
gathering May 20-July 12 only; hunting molting/non-nesting waterfowl
July 1-July 31 only.
(2) Closure: June 10-August 14, except for the taking of seabird
eggs and molting/non-nesting waterfowl as
[[Page 76999]]
provided in paragraph (f)(1) of this section.
(g) North Slope Region.
(1) Southern Unit (Southwestern North Slope regional boundary east
to Peard Bay, everything west of the longitude line 158[deg]30'W and
south of the latitude line 70[deg]45'N to the west bank of the Ikpikpuk
River, and everything south of the latitude line 69[deg]45'N between
the west bank of the Ikpikpuk River to the east bank of Sagavinirktok
River):
(i) Season: April 2-June 29 and July 30-August 31 for seabirds;
April 2-June 19 and July 20-August 31 for all other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 30-July 29 for seabirds; June 20-July 19 for all
other birds.
(iii) Special Black Brant Hunting Opening: From June 20-July 5. The
open area would consist of the coastline, from mean high water line
outward to include open water, from Nokotlek Point east to longitude
line 158[deg]30'W. This includes Peard Bay, Kugrua Bay, and Wainwright
Inlet, but not the Kuk and Kugrua river drainages.
(2) Northern Unit (At Peard Bay, everything east of the longitude
line 158[deg]30'W and north of the latitude line 70[deg]45'N to west
bank of the Ikpikpuk River, and everything north of the latitude line
69[deg]45'N between the west bank of the Ikpikpuk River to the east
bank of Sagavinirktok River):
(i) Season: April 6-June 6 and July 7-August 31 for king and common
eiders; April 2-June 15 and July 16-August 31 for all other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 7-July 6 for king and common eiders; June 16-
July 15 for all other birds.
(iii) Special Hunting Restrictions for Barrow: Migratory bird
hunting is not permitted within 1 mile of either side or end of
Cakeeater/Gaswell, Nunavak and Freshwater Lake roads and any spur
roads.
(3) Eastern Unit (East of eastern bank of the Sagavanirktok River):
(i) Season: April 2-June 19 and July 20-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 20-July 19.
(4) All Units: yellow-billed loons. Annually, up to 20 yellow-
billed loons total for the region may be inadvertently entangled in
subsistence fishing nets in the North Slope Region and kept for
subsistence use. Individuals must report each yellow-billed loon
inadvertently entangled while subsistence gill net fishing to the North
Slope Borough Department of Wildlife Management by the end of the
season.
(5) North Coastal Zone (Cape Thompson north to Point Hope and east
along the Arctic Ocean coastline around Point Barrow to Ross Point,
including Iko Bay, and 5 miles inland).
(i) Migratory bird hunting is permitted from one-half hour before
sunrise until sunset.
(ii) No person shall at any time, by any means, or in any manner,
possess or have in custody any migratory bird or part thereof, taken in
violation of subpart C and D of this part.
(iii) Upon request from a Service law enforcement officer, hunters
taking, attempting to take, or transporting migratory birds taken
during the subsistence harvest season must present them to the officer
for species identification.
(h) Interior Region.
(1) Season: April 2-June 14 and July 16-August 31; egg gathering
May 1-June 14 only.
(2) Closure: June 15-July 15.
(i) Upper Copper River Region (Harvest Area: Units 11 and 13)
(Eligible communities: Gulkana, Chitina, Tazlina, Copper Center,
Gakona, Mentasta Lake, Chistochina and Cantwell).
(1) Season: April 15-May 26 and June 27-August 31.
(2) Closure: May 27-June 26.
(3) The Copper River Basin communities listed above also documented
traditional use harvesting birds in Unit 12, making them eligible to
hunt in this unit using the seasons specified in paragraph (h) of this
section.
(j) Gulf of Alaska Region.
(1) Prince William Sound Area (Harvest area: Unit 6 [D]), (Eligible
Chugach communities: Chenega Bay, Tatitlek).
(i) Season: April 2-May 31 and July 1-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 1-30.
(2) Kachemak Bay Area (Harvest area: Unit 15[C] South of a line
connecting the tip of Homer Spit to the mouth of Fox River) (Eligible
Chugach Communities: Port Graham, Nanwalek).
(i) Season: April 2-May 31 and July 1-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 1-30.
(k) Cook Inlet (Harvest area: portions of Unit 16[B] as specified
below) (Eligible communities: Tyonek only).
(1) Season: April 2-May 31--That portion of Unit 16(B) south of the
Skwentna River and west of the Yentna River, and August 1-31--That
portion of Unit 16(B) south of the Beluga River, Beluga Lake, and the
Triumvirate Glacier.
(2) Closure: June 1-July 31.
(l) Southeast Alaska.
(1) Community of Hoonah (Harvest area: National Forest lands in Icy
Strait and Cross Sound, including Middle Pass Rock near the Inian
Islands, Table Rock in Cross Sound, and other traditional locations on
the coast of Yakobi Island. The land and waters of Glacier Bay National
Park remain closed to all subsistence harvesting [50 CFR 100.3].
(i) Season: Glaucous-winged gull egg gathering only: May 15-June
30.
(ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.
(2) Communities of Craig and Hydaburg (Harvest area: Small islands
and adjacent shoreline of western Prince of Wales Island from Point
Baker to Cape Chacon, but also including Coronation and Warren
islands).
(i) Season: Glaucous-winged gull egg gathering only: May 15-June
30.
(ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.
(3) Community of Yakutat (Harvest area: Icy Bay [Icy Cape to Pt.
Riou], and coastal lands and islands bordering the Gulf of Alaska from
Pt. Manby southeast to Dry Bay).
(i) Season: Glaucous-winged gull, aleutian and arctic tern egg
gathering: May 15-June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.
3. In subpart D, add Sec. 92.32 to read as follows:
Sec. 92.32 Emergency regulations to protect Steller's eiders.
Upon finding that continuation of these subsistence regulations
would pose an imminent threat to the conservation of threatened
Steller's eiders, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Alaska Regional
Director, in consultation with the Co-management Council, will
immediately under Sec. 92.21 take action as is necessary to prevent
further take. Regulation changes implemented could range from a
temporary closure of duck hunting in a small geographic area to large-
scale regional or State-wide long-term closures of all subsistence
migratory bird hunting. Such closures or temporary suspensions will
remain in effect until the Regional Director, in consultation with the
Co-management Council, determines that the potential for additional
Steller's eiders to be taken no longer exists.
Dated: December 10, 2008.
Lyle Laverty,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E8-30081 Filed 12-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P