Export Credit Guarantee Program, 76568-76569 [E8-29831]
Download as PDF
76568
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 243
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Commodity Credit Corporation
7 CFR Part 1493
RIN 0551–AA79
Export Credit Guarantee Program
Foreign Agricultural Service
and Commodity Credit Corporation,
USDA.
ACTION: Advanced notice of proposed
rulemaking.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This advanced notice of
proposed rulemaking (ANPR) solicits
comments on options to reform the
USDA, Commodity Credit Corporation
(CCC), Export Credit Guarantee Program
(GSM–102). The purpose of the ANPR is
to invite suggestions on improvements
and changes to be made in the
implementation and operation of the
GSM–102 program, with the intent of
improving the GSM–102 program’s
effectiveness, efficiency, and lower
costs.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by February 2, 2009 to be
assured consideration.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• E-Mail:
GSM102.ANPR@fas.usda.gov.
• Fax: (202) 720–2495, Attention:
‘‘GSM102/ANPR Comments’’.
• Mail to: P. Mark Rowse, Director,
Office of Trade Programs, Credit
Programs Division, Foreign Agricultural
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Stop 1025, Washington, DC 20250–
1025.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: 1250
Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington,
DC 20024.
All comments received will be
available for public inspection at the
above address during regular business
hours.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: P.
Mark Rowse, Director, Credit Programs
Division, at the address stated above or
telephone: (202) 720–0624.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Dec 16, 2008
Jkt 217001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The GSM–102 program is currently
authorized under the Agricultural Trade
Act of 1978, as amended. The GSM–102
program helps to ensure that credit is
available to finance commercial exports
of U.S. agricultural products on
competitive credit terms. The CCC
currently has authorized availability of
guarantees for transactions in at least
176 countries and regions, with 2,900
exporters eligible to participate. Since
1981, CCC has issued approximately
$86.5 billion in credit guarantees under
the GSM–102 program.
By allowing assignment of the
guarantee by the U.S exporter to an
approved U.S. financial institution, the
program guarantees credit extended by
the approved U.S. financial institution
(or, less commonly, by the U.S. exporter
if not assigned) to approved foreign
banks. The credit facility mechanism is
a dollar-denominated, irrevocable letter
of credit.
Under the terms of the guarantee,
typically, 98 percent of principal and a
portion of interest are covered on credit
terms of up to three years. By financing
less than 100 percent of the exported
value, CCC encourages risk-sharing by
the exporter or the exporter’s assignee.
By law, the program may not be used
for foreign aid, foreign policy or debt
rescheduling purposes, or in countries
that the Secretary of Agriculture (the
Secretary) has determined cannot
service the debt.
Defaults/Claims
If the foreign bank fails to make any
payment as agreed under the GSM–102
program guaranteed transaction, the
exporter or assignee must submit a
notice of default to the CCC. A claim for
loss also may be filed, and the CCC will
promptly pay claims found to be in
good order. For CCC audit purposes, the
U.S. exporter must obtain
documentation to show that the
commodity arrived in the eligible
country, and must maintain all
transaction documents for five years
from the date of completion of all
payments.
Participation Criteria
The CCC must qualify exporters for
participation before accepting guarantee
applications. An exporter must have a
business office in the United States and
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
must not be debarred or suspended from
any U.S. government program. Financial
institutions must meet established
criteria and be approved by the CCC.
The CCC evaluates the ability of each
country and each approved foreign bank
to service CCC-guaranteed debt. For
programming purposes, a credit limit is
established for each obligor country.
Banks within that approved obligor
country are reviewed and individual
bank credit lines are established. New
banks may be added or existing
approved bank levels may be increased
or decreased as appropriate, based on
available information.
Eligible Commodities
The CCC selects agricultural
commodities and products according to
market potential and eligibility based on
applicable legislative and regulatory
requirements. These include bulk,
intermediate and consumer ready
agricultural products encompassing
food, feed, fiber, aquaculture and forest
products. The agricultural commodities
must be 100 percent U.S. origin unless
they have been determined by the
Secretary to be high-value agricultural
products. If a high-value product
determination is made, 90 percent or
more of the agricultural components by
weight, excluding packaging and added
water, must be entirely produced in the
United States.
Fees
The issuance of the guarantee is
subject to a fee paid by the applicant. In
July 2005, USDA initiated a risk-based
fee structure. A fee is charged based on
the terms of the guarantee in tenure
(length of credit period) and terms for
principal payment installments,
whether 6 months or annually, and the
risk grade of the obligor country. The
CCC assigns a numeric risk category (0–
6, lowest to highest risk). The risk
category, along with the other factors
cited, determines the fee charged.
Statutory Revisions and Budgetary
Limits
Prior to the June 18, 2008, enactment
into law of the Food, Conservation, and
Energy Act of 2008, provisions of the
Agricultural Trade Act of 1978, as
amended, required the Export Credit
Guarantee programs operated by CCC to
make available not less that $5.5 billion
in credit guarantees under its combined
authority to issue short-term credit
E:\FR\FM\17DEP1.SGM
17DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 17, 2008 / Proposed Rules
guarantees (GSM–102 and Supplier
Credit Guarantee (SCGP) programs) up
to three years, and medium-term credit
guarantees (GSM–103 program) from
three to 10 years. Origination fees for
the short-term credit guarantees were
also previously capped at 1 percent.
Section 1542 of the Food, Agriculture,
Conservation and Trade Act of 1990
required that CCC make available not
less than $1 billion in direct credit or
credit guarantees to emerging markets,
of which a portion should be made
available for facilities and services.
The authority for the SCGP, the GSM–
103 program, and the 1 percent
origination fee cap were all repealed by
the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act
of 2008. The Food, Conservation, and
Energy Act of 2008 also amended the
statutory funding levels for short-term
credit guarantees by requiring that CCC
make credit guarantees available for
each fiscal year (FY) through FY 2012 in
an amount equal to, but not more than,
(a) the lesser of $5.5 billion in credit
guarantees, (b) or the sum of the amount
of credit guarantees that could be made
available using budget authority of $40
million, plus any unobligated budget
authority for credit guarantees from
prior fiscal years and required that, to
the maximum extent practicable, ensure
that the risk-based fees associated with
the guarantees cover, but do not exceed,
the operating costs and losses for the
program over the long term.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Recent History
Beginning in FY 2005, increased
global liquidity and the advent of riskbased fees resulted in a decline in
program usage from an average annual
value of sales registered of
approximately $3 billion for the
preceding 10-year period, to $1.36
billion in FY 2006. However, from July
through September of FY 2007, CCC
experienced a significant increase in
participation and dollar value levels
under the GSM–102 program. Part of
this increase was the result of increased
commodity prices. However, tightening
of global credit markets also is believed
to have contributed significantly to the
increase in participation and program
demand. These driving factors propelled
GSM–102 transactions from $1.4 billion
in FY 2007, to over $3 billon in FY
2008. Demand and usage is expected to
further increase in FY 2009.
Comments
As a result of anticipated increase in
demand, we are soliciting the responses
of interested parties to the following
specific questions concerning options
under consideration for the GSM–102
program. Interested parties may choose
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Dec 16, 2008
Jkt 217001
to address any or all of the questions
listed or provide other comments. CCC’s
aim is to improve upon the GSM–102’s
effectiveness and efficiency, and lower
costs.
Additional program information
inclusive of our fee structure is available
on our Web site at https://
www.fas.usda.gov/excredits/ecgp.asp.
1. Fees
—Does the current risk-based fee
schedule correctly distinguish levels
of risk specific to loan tenor, country
of obligor and amount of coverage?
—Does the current risk-based fee
structure capture sufficient variables
that are responsive to the changing
credit markets?
—Should CCC consider charging fees for
amendments to guarantees or
applications?
—How should the fee structure take into
account levels of risk particular to
individual obligors?
2. Alternative Registration Processes
—Should CCC consider moving from
the current first-come, first-serve and
pro-rata methodologies for issuance of
guarantees?
—Should the GSM–102 program be run
on an awards basis? CCC would
award GSM–102 guarantees on a
competitive basis based upon exporter
bids which would propose varying
levels of coverage and different fee
structures.
—Should CCC consider permitting
exporters to submit letters of intent in
which they propose how much they
would like to export under a specified
announcement? CCC would review all
letters of intent and award shares of
the announcement based on the
letters of intent.
—Should CCC require copies of sales
contracts and proof of financing to be
submitted with the application for
guarantee?
—Should CCC require that a ‘‘firm sale’’
include approved financing?
3. Additional Questions
—Should CCC consider permitting
global banking whereby any CCC
approved bank could finance sales of
U.S. agricultural products for
shipment to any CCC approved
country?
—Should CCC consider no longer
permitting sales in which the
exporter, intervening purchaser, or
importers are affiliated organizations?
—Should CCC consider no longer
permitting sales in which there is an
intervening purchaser?
—Should CCC consider no longer
permitting foreign bank amendments
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
76569
to the application/guarantee except
under extraordinary circumstances
which would require documentation
from the original foreign bank?
—Should CCC consider more rigid
qualification criteria for exporters?
—Should CCC bring the time frame for
claims payment into conformity with
that contemplated under the Prompt
Payment Act?
Consideration of Comments:
Additional comments on other program
modifications to the GSM–102 program
that are responsive to the principles
outlined herein are encouraged. CCC
will carefully consider all comments
submitted by interested parties. After
consideration of the comments received,
CCC will consider what changes should
be made to the GSM–102 program.
Some of the changes described above
would require solicitation and
consideration of comments received
from interested parties via the
rulemaking process. Other changes
might be adopted by changing internal
policies and procedures. Comments
received will help CCC to determine the
extent and scope of any future
rulemaking.
Signed at Washington, DC, on November
26, 2008.
W. Kirk Miller,
Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit
Corporation, and Administrator, Foreign
Agricultural Service.
[FR Doc. E8–29831 Filed 12–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 431
[Docket No. EERE–2008–BT–TP–0017]
RIN 1904–AB87
Energy Conservation Program for
Certain Commercial and Industrial
Equipment: Test Procedures for Metal
Halide Lamp Ballasts
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) will hold a public meeting
to discuss and receive comment
concerning its proposal to establish
metal halide lamp ballast test
procedures that manufacturers would
use to demonstrate compliance with the
metal halide ballast energy conservation
standards mandated by the statute.
DATES: DOE will hold a public meeting
in Washington, DC, on Friday,
December 19, 2008, beginning at 9 a.m.
E:\FR\FM\17DEP1.SGM
17DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 17, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76568-76569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-29831]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 17, 2008 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 76568]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Commodity Credit Corporation
7 CFR Part 1493
RIN 0551-AA79
Export Credit Guarantee Program
AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service and Commodity Credit Corporation,
USDA.
ACTION: Advanced notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) solicits
comments on options to reform the USDA, Commodity Credit Corporation
(CCC), Export Credit Guarantee Program (GSM-102). The purpose of the
ANPR is to invite suggestions on improvements and changes to be made in
the implementation and operation of the GSM-102 program, with the
intent of improving the GSM-102 program's effectiveness, efficiency,
and lower costs.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by February 2, 2009 to
be assured consideration.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
E-Mail: GSM102.ANPR@fas.usda.gov.
Fax: (202) 720-2495, Attention: ``GSM102/ANPR Comments''.
Mail to: P. Mark Rowse, Director, Office of Trade
Programs, Credit Programs Division, Foreign Agricultural Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Stop 1025, Washington, DC 20250-1025.
Hand Delivery or Courier: 1250 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20024.
All comments received will be available for public inspection at
the above address during regular business hours.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: P. Mark Rowse, Director, Credit
Programs Division, at the address stated above or telephone: (202) 720-
0624.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The GSM-102 program is currently authorized under the Agricultural
Trade Act of 1978, as amended. The GSM-102 program helps to ensure that
credit is available to finance commercial exports of U.S. agricultural
products on competitive credit terms. The CCC currently has authorized
availability of guarantees for transactions in at least 176 countries
and regions, with 2,900 exporters eligible to participate. Since 1981,
CCC has issued approximately $86.5 billion in credit guarantees under
the GSM-102 program.
By allowing assignment of the guarantee by the U.S exporter to an
approved U.S. financial institution, the program guarantees credit
extended by the approved U.S. financial institution (or, less commonly,
by the U.S. exporter if not assigned) to approved foreign banks. The
credit facility mechanism is a dollar-denominated, irrevocable letter
of credit.
Under the terms of the guarantee, typically, 98 percent of
principal and a portion of interest are covered on credit terms of up
to three years. By financing less than 100 percent of the exported
value, CCC encourages risk-sharing by the exporter or the exporter's
assignee.
By law, the program may not be used for foreign aid, foreign policy
or debt rescheduling purposes, or in countries that the Secretary of
Agriculture (the Secretary) has determined cannot service the debt.
Defaults/Claims
If the foreign bank fails to make any payment as agreed under the
GSM-102 program guaranteed transaction, the exporter or assignee must
submit a notice of default to the CCC. A claim for loss also may be
filed, and the CCC will promptly pay claims found to be in good order.
For CCC audit purposes, the U.S. exporter must obtain documentation to
show that the commodity arrived in the eligible country, and must
maintain all transaction documents for five years from the date of
completion of all payments.
Participation Criteria
The CCC must qualify exporters for participation before accepting
guarantee applications. An exporter must have a business office in the
United States and must not be debarred or suspended from any U.S.
government program. Financial institutions must meet established
criteria and be approved by the CCC.
The CCC evaluates the ability of each country and each approved
foreign bank to service CCC-guaranteed debt. For programming purposes,
a credit limit is established for each obligor country. Banks within
that approved obligor country are reviewed and individual bank credit
lines are established. New banks may be added or existing approved bank
levels may be increased or decreased as appropriate, based on available
information.
Eligible Commodities
The CCC selects agricultural commodities and products according to
market potential and eligibility based on applicable legislative and
regulatory requirements. These include bulk, intermediate and consumer
ready agricultural products encompassing food, feed, fiber, aquaculture
and forest products. The agricultural commodities must be 100 percent
U.S. origin unless they have been determined by the Secretary to be
high-value agricultural products. If a high-value product determination
is made, 90 percent or more of the agricultural components by weight,
excluding packaging and added water, must be entirely produced in the
United States.
Fees
The issuance of the guarantee is subject to a fee paid by the
applicant. In July 2005, USDA initiated a risk-based fee structure. A
fee is charged based on the terms of the guarantee in tenure (length of
credit period) and terms for principal payment installments, whether 6
months or annually, and the risk grade of the obligor country. The CCC
assigns a numeric risk category (0-6, lowest to highest risk). The risk
category, along with the other factors cited, determines the fee
charged.
Statutory Revisions and Budgetary Limits
Prior to the June 18, 2008, enactment into law of the Food,
Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, provisions of the Agricultural
Trade Act of 1978, as amended, required the Export Credit Guarantee
programs operated by CCC to make available not less that $5.5 billion
in credit guarantees under its combined authority to issue short-term
credit
[[Page 76569]]
guarantees (GSM-102 and Supplier Credit Guarantee (SCGP) programs) up
to three years, and medium-term credit guarantees (GSM-103 program)
from three to 10 years. Origination fees for the short-term credit
guarantees were also previously capped at 1 percent. Section 1542 of
the Food, Agriculture, Conservation and Trade Act of 1990 required that
CCC make available not less than $1 billion in direct credit or credit
guarantees to emerging markets, of which a portion should be made
available for facilities and services.
The authority for the SCGP, the GSM-103 program, and the 1 percent
origination fee cap were all repealed by the Food, Conservation, and
Energy Act of 2008. The Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 also
amended the statutory funding levels for short-term credit guarantees
by requiring that CCC make credit guarantees available for each fiscal
year (FY) through FY 2012 in an amount equal to, but not more than, (a)
the lesser of $5.5 billion in credit guarantees, (b) or the sum of the
amount of credit guarantees that could be made available using budget
authority of $40 million, plus any unobligated budget authority for
credit guarantees from prior fiscal years and required that, to the
maximum extent practicable, ensure that the risk-based fees associated
with the guarantees cover, but do not exceed, the operating costs and
losses for the program over the long term.
Recent History
Beginning in FY 2005, increased global liquidity and the advent of
risk-based fees resulted in a decline in program usage from an average
annual value of sales registered of approximately $3 billion for the
preceding 10-year period, to $1.36 billion in FY 2006. However, from
July through September of FY 2007, CCC experienced a significant
increase in participation and dollar value levels under the GSM-102
program. Part of this increase was the result of increased commodity
prices. However, tightening of global credit markets also is believed
to have contributed significantly to the increase in participation and
program demand. These driving factors propelled GSM-102 transactions
from $1.4 billion in FY 2007, to over $3 billon in FY 2008. Demand and
usage is expected to further increase in FY 2009.
Comments
As a result of anticipated increase in demand, we are soliciting
the responses of interested parties to the following specific questions
concerning options under consideration for the GSM-102 program.
Interested parties may choose to address any or all of the questions
listed or provide other comments. CCC's aim is to improve upon the GSM-
102's effectiveness and efficiency, and lower costs.
Additional program information inclusive of our fee structure is
available on our Web site at https://www.fas.usda.gov/excredits/
ecgp.asp.
1. Fees
--Does the current risk-based fee schedule correctly distinguish levels
of risk specific to loan tenor, country of obligor and amount of
coverage?
--Does the current risk-based fee structure capture sufficient
variables that are responsive to the changing credit markets?
--Should CCC consider charging fees for amendments to guarantees or
applications?
--How should the fee structure take into account levels of risk
particular to individual obligors?
2. Alternative Registration Processes
--Should CCC consider moving from the current first-come, first-serve
and pro-rata methodologies for issuance of guarantees?
--Should the GSM-102 program be run on an awards basis? CCC would award
GSM-102 guarantees on a competitive basis based upon exporter bids
which would propose varying levels of coverage and different fee
structures.
--Should CCC consider permitting exporters to submit letters of intent
in which they propose how much they would like to export under a
specified announcement? CCC would review all letters of intent and
award shares of the announcement based on the letters of intent.
--Should CCC require copies of sales contracts and proof of financing
to be submitted with the application for guarantee?
--Should CCC require that a ``firm sale'' include approved financing?
3. Additional Questions
--Should CCC consider permitting global banking whereby any CCC
approved bank could finance sales of U.S. agricultural products for
shipment to any CCC approved country?
--Should CCC consider no longer permitting sales in which the exporter,
intervening purchaser, or importers are affiliated organizations?
--Should CCC consider no longer permitting sales in which there is an
intervening purchaser?
--Should CCC consider no longer permitting foreign bank amendments to
the application/guarantee except under extraordinary circumstances
which would require documentation from the original foreign bank?
--Should CCC consider more rigid qualification criteria for exporters?
--Should CCC bring the time frame for claims payment into conformity
with that contemplated under the Prompt Payment Act?
Consideration of Comments: Additional comments on other program
modifications to the GSM-102 program that are responsive to the
principles outlined herein are encouraged. CCC will carefully consider
all comments submitted by interested parties. After consideration of
the comments received, CCC will consider what changes should be made to
the GSM-102 program. Some of the changes described above would require
solicitation and consideration of comments received from interested
parties via the rulemaking process. Other changes might be adopted by
changing internal policies and procedures. Comments received will help
CCC to determine the extent and scope of any future rulemaking.
Signed at Washington, DC, on November 26, 2008.
W. Kirk Miller,
Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation, and
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
[FR Doc. E8-29831 Filed 12-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-10-P