Sunshine Act; Notice of Agency Meeting, 76406-76407 [E8-29778]
Download as PDF
76406
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 16, 2008 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
decree even though the court would
have imposed a greater remedy). To
meet this standard, the United States
‘‘need only provide a factual basis for
concluding that the settlements are
reasonably adequate remedies for the
alleged harms.’’ SBC Commc’ns, 489 F.
Supp. 2d at 17.
Moreover, the court’s role under the
APPA is limited to reviewing the
remedy in relationship to the violations
that the United States has alleged in its
Complaint, and does not authorize the
court to ‘‘construct [its] own
hypothetical case and then evaluate the
decree against that case.’’ Microsoft, 56
F.3d at 1459. Because the ‘‘court’s
authority to review the decree depends
entirely on the government’s exercising
its prosecutorial discretion by bringing
a case in the first place,’’ it follows that
‘‘the court is only authorized to review
the decree itself,’’ and not to ‘‘effectively
redraft the complaint’’ to inquire into
other matters that the United States did
not pursue. Id. at 1459–60. As this Court
recently confirmed in SBC
Communications, courts ‘‘cannot look
beyond the complaint in making the
public interest determination unless the
complaint is drafted so narrowly as to
make a mockery of judicial power.’’ SBC
Commc’ns, 489 F. Supp. 2d at 15.
In its 2004 amendments, Congress
made clear its intent to preserve the
practical benefits of utilizing consent
decrees in antitrust enforcement, adding
the unambiguous instruction that
‘‘[n]othing in this section shall be
construed to require the court to
conduct an evidentiary hearing or to
require the court to permit anyone to
intervene.’’ 15 U.S.C. 16(e)(2). The
language wrote into the statute what
Congress intended when it enacted the
Tunney Act in 1974, as Senator Tunney
explained: ‘‘[t]he court is nowhere
compelled to go to trial or to engage in
extended proceedings which might have
the effect of vitiating the benefits of
prompt and less costly settlement
through the consent decree process.’’
119 Cong. Rec. 24,598 (1973) (statement
of Senator Tunney). Rather, the
procedure for the public interest
determination is left to the discretion of
the court, with the recognition that the
court’s ‘‘scope of review remains
sharply proscribed by precedent and the
nature of Tunney Act proceedings.’’
SBC Commc’ns, 489 F. Supp. 2d at 11.3
3 See United States v. Enova Corp., 107 F. Supp.
2d 10, 17 (D.D.C. 2000) (noting that the ‘‘Tunney
Act expressly allows the court to make its public
interest determination on the basis of the
competitive impact statement and response to
comments alone’’); United States v. Mid-Am.
Dairymen, Inc., 1977–1 Trade Cas. (CCH) ’61,508,
at 71,980 (W.D. Mo. 1977) (‘‘Absent a showing of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:09 Dec 15, 2008
Jkt 217001
VIII. Determinative Documents
There are no determinative materials
or documents within the meaning of the
APPA that were considered by the
United States in formulating the
proposed Final Judgment.
Dated: December 3, 2008
Respectfully submitted,
/s/
Lowell R. Stern,
DC Bar No. 440487, U.S. Department of
Justice, Antitrust Division, Litigation II
Section, 1401 H Street, NW., Suite 3000,
Washington, DC 20530, (202) 307–0924
[FR Doc. E8–29603 Filed 12–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (08–097)]
NASA Advisory Council; Science
Committee; Earth Science
Subcommittee; Meeting
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA)
announces a meeting of the Earth
Science Subcommittee of the NASA
Advisory Council (NAC). This
Subcommittee reports to the Science
Committee of the NAC. The Meeting
will be held for the purpose of soliciting
from the scientific community and other
persons scientific and technical
information relevant to program
planning.
DATES: Wednesday, January 7, 2009,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Thursday,
January 8, 2009, 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m.
Eastern Daylight Time.
ADDRESSES: NASA Headquarters, Room
3H46, 300 E Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20546.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Marian Norris, Science Mission
Directorate, NASA Headquarters,
Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358–4452,
fax (202) 358–4118, or
mnorris@nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting will be open to the public up
to the capacity of the room. The agenda
for the meeting includes the following
topics:
—Earth Science Division Update
—NASA’s Modeling Program
—Decadal Survey Mission
Implementation and Comparative
Cost Analysis of Earth and Space
Science Missions
It is imperative that the meeting be
held on these dates to accommodate the
scheduling priorities of the key
participants. Attendees will be
requested to sign a register and to
comply with NASA security
requirements, including the
presentation of a valid picture ID, before
receiving an access badge. Foreign
nationals attending this meeting will be
required to provide the following
information no less than 7 working days
prior to the meeting: full name; gender;
date/place of birth; citizenship; visa/
green card information (number, type,
expiration date); passport information
(number, country, expiration date);
employer/affiliation information (name
of institution, address, country,
telephone); title/position of attendee. To
expedite admittance, attendees with
U.S. citizenship can provide identifying
information 3 working days in advance
by contacting Marian Norris via e-mail
at mnorris@nasa.gov or by telephone at
(202) 358–4452.
Dated: December 10, 2008.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer,
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–29757 Filed 12–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
Sunshine Act; Notice of Agency
Meeting
TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday,
December 18, 2008.
PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room
7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA
22314–3428.
STATUS:
corrupt failure of the government to discharge its
duty, the Court, in making its public interest
finding, should * * * carefully consider the
explanations of the government in the competitive
impact statement and its responses to comments in
order to determine whether those explanations are
reasonable under the circumstances.’’); S. Rep. No.
93–298, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., at 6 (1973) (‘‘Where
the public interest can be meaningfully evaluated
simply on the basis of briefs and oral arguments,
that is the approach that should be utilized.’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Open.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. Final
Rule—Parts 712 and 741 of NCUA Rules
and Regulations, Credit Union Service
Organizations.
2. Final Rule—Part 706 of NCUA
Rules and Regulations, Unfair or
Deceptive Acts or Practices.
3. Insurance Fund Report.
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 16, 2008 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board,
Telephone: 703–518–6304.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8–29778 Filed 12–12–08; 11:15
am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Intent To Seek Approval To
Extend an Information Collection
National Science Foundation.
Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is announcing plans
to request clearance of this collection. In
accordance with the requirement of
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13),
we are providing opportunity for public
comment on this action. After obtaining
and considering public comment, NSF
will prepare the submission requesting
that OMB approve clearance of this
collection for no longer than three years.
DATES: Written comments on this notice
must be received by February 17, 2009
to be assured of consideration.
Comments received after that date will
be considered to the extent practicable.
For Additional Information or
Comments: Contact Suzanne H.
Plimpton, Reports Clearance Officer,
National Science Foundation, 4201
Wilson Boulevard, Suite 295, Arlington,
Virginia 22230; telephone (703) 292–
7556; or send e-mail to
splimpto@nsf.gov. Individuals who use
a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8
p.m., Eastern time, Monday through
Friday. You also may obtain a copy of
the data collection instrument and
instructions from Ms. Plimpton.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Collection: Grantee Reporting
Requirements for Science and
Technology Centers (STC): Integrative
Partnerships.
OMB Number: 3145–0194.
Expiration Date of Approval: February
28, 2009.
Type of Request: Intent to seek
approval to extend an information
collection.
Abstract:
Proposed Project:
The Science and Technology Centers
(STC): Integrative Partnerships Program
supports innovation in the integrative
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:09 Dec 15, 2008
Jkt 217001
conduct of research, education and
knowledge transfer. Science and
Technology Centers build intellectual
and physical infrastructure within and
between disciplines, weaving together
knowledge creation, knowledge
integration, and knowledge transfer.
STCs conduct world-class research
through partnerships of academic
institutions, national laboratories,
industrial organizations, and/or other
public/private entities. New knowledge
thus created is meaningfully linked to
society.
STCs enable and foster excellent
education, integrate research and
education, and create bonds between
learning and inquiry so that discovery
and creativity more fully support the
learning process. STCs capitalize on
diversity through participation in center
activities and demonstrate leadership in
the involvement of groups
underrepresented in science and
engineering.
Centers selected will be required to
submit annual reports on progress and
plans, which will be used as a basis for
performance review and determining
the level of continued funding. To
support this review and the
management of a Center, STCs will be
required to develop a set of management
and performance indicators for
submission annually to NSF via an NSF
evaluation technical assistance
contractor. These indicators are both
quantitative and descriptive and may
include, for example, the characteristics
of center personnel and students;
sources of financial support and in-kind
support; expenditures by operational
component; characteristics of industrial
and/or other sector participation;
research activities; education activities;
knowledge transfer activities; patents,
licenses; publications; degrees granted
to students involved in Center activities;
descriptions of significant advances and
other outcomes of the STC effort. Part of
this reporting will take the form of a
database which will be owned by the
institution and eventually made
available to an evaluation contractor.
This database will capture specific
information to demonstrate progress
towards achieving the goals of the
program. Such reporting requirements
will be included in the cooperative
agreement which is binding between the
academic institution and the NSF.
Each Center’s annual report will
address the following categories of
activities: (1) Research, (2) education,
(3) knowledge transfer, (4) partnerships,
(5) diversity, (6) management and (7)
budget issues.
For each of the categories the report
will describe overall objectives for the
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76407
year, problems the Center has
encountered in making progress towards
goals, anticipated problems in the
following year, and specific outputs and
outcomes.
Use of the Information: NSF will use
the information to continue funding of
the Centers, and to evaluate the progress
of the program.
Estimate of Burden: 100 hours per
center for seventeen centers for a total
of 1700 hours.
Respondents: Non-profit institutions;
Federal government.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Report: One from each of the seventeen
centers.
Comments: Comments are invited on
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information on respondents,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Dated: December 11, 2008.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. E8–29700 Filed 12–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Biweekly Notice; Applications and
Amendments to Facility Operating
Licenses Involving No Significant
Hazards Considerations
I. Background
Pursuant to section 189a. (2) of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended
(the Act), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (the Commission or NRC
staff) is publishing this regular biweekly
notice. The Act requires the
Commission publish notice of any
amendments issued, or proposed to be
issued and grants the Commission the
authority to issue and make
immediately effective any amendment
to an operating license upon a
determination by the Commission that
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76406-76407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-29778]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
Sunshine Act; Notice of Agency Meeting
TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday, December 18, 2008.
PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria,
VA 22314-3428.
STATUS: Open.
Matters To Be Considered: 1. Final Rule--Parts 712 and 741 of NCUA
Rules and Regulations, Credit Union Service Organizations.
2. Final Rule--Part 706 of NCUA Rules and Regulations, Unfair or
Deceptive Acts or Practices.
3. Insurance Fund Report.
[[Page 76407]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board,
Telephone: 703-518-6304.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-29778 Filed 12-12-08; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P