Escalante Ranger District, Dixie National Forest; UT; Pockets Resource Management Forest Service, USDA, 75998-75999 [E8-29429]
Download as PDF
75998
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 241 / Monday, December 15, 2008 / Notices
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the 45day comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21.
Dated: December 1, 2008.
Jeanne Higgins,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E8–29439 Filed 12–12–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Escalante Ranger District, Dixie
National Forest; UT; Pockets Resource
Management Forest Service, USDA
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a
supplement to the final environmental
impact statement.
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service
announces its intent to prepare a
supplement to the Pockets Resource
Management Project (PRMP) Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS).
PRMP FEIS evaluated alternatives for
vegetation management and associated
road improvements within the
Englemann spruce/subalpine fir and
aspen forest types on the Escalante
Ranger District, Dixie National Forest.
The original proposed action and
subsequent analysis disclosed in the
FEIS remains unchanged. The purpose
of this supplement is to provide
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:00 Dec 12, 2008
Jkt 217001
additional analysis and disclosure on
the effects of the proposed action on
unroaded and undeveloped areas
identified on a 2005 draft map produced
during forest plan revision as part of a
required inventory and evaluation of
areas with wilderness potential. This
analysis will focus on the impacts to the
wilderness attributes of the three areas
being affected by the proposed action.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
February 15, 2009. The draft
supplement to the final environmental
impact statement is expected in March
2009 and the final environmental
impact statement is expected May 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Georgina Lampman, District Ranger,
P.O. Box 246, Escalante, Utah 84726.
Written comments should be specific
and should be limited to the scope of
this supplement. If you do not have any
comments, but wish to remain on the
mailing list for this proposal, please
send a letter to the above address, or email address listed below and request to
be kept informed about the proposal. An
e-mail comment mailbox is established
for receiving comments electronically
at: comments-intermtn-dixieescalante@fs.fed.us. Please use the
project name (Pockets Resource
Management Project) as the subject line
in your e-mail comment message.
Electronic comments must be submitted
in a format such as an e-mail message,
plain text (.txt), rich text format (.rtf), or
Word (.doc).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mail
written correspondence to Marianne
Orton, Interdisciplinary Team Leader,
Powell Ranger Station, P.O. Box 80,
Panguitch, Utah 84759.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
On June 16, 2006 a Notice of Intent to
prepare an environmental impact
statement for the Pockets Resource
Management Project (PRMP) was
published in the Federal Register. In
November 2007 the Notice of
Availability of the draft environmental
impact statement for the PRMP was
published in the Federal Register. On
July 14, 2008, Robert MacWhorter, Dixie
National Forest Supervisor, signed the
Record of Decision for the Pockets
Resource Management Project Final
Environmental Impact Statement and
the NOA was published on August 1,
2008. Three organizations including
Utah Environmental Congress, Forest
Guardians, and Sierra Club, Utah
Chapter, appealed Forest Supervisor
Robert MacWhorter’s decision stating a
lack of disclosure on impacts to areas
with wilderness potential.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Forest Supervisor Robert MacWhorter
withdrew the decision in October 2008
and directed the PRMP Interdisciplinary
Team to prepare a Supplement to the
FEIS that discloses the impacts to the
wilderness potential of the Pacer Lake,
Antimony, and Dry Lake areas
inventoried during forest plan revision.
The Record of Decision for the SEIS will
be appealable under 36 CFR 215 and
should only address those items
pertinent to the disclosure of effects to
the wilderness attributes of these areas.
Comment Requested
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft
supplement to the final environmental
impact statement will be prepared for
comment. The comment period on the
draft supplement will be 45 days from
the date the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes the notice of
availability in the Federal Register. The
Forest Service believes, at this early
stage, it is important to give reviewers
notice of several court rulings related to
public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final
environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the 45
day comment period so that timely
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
supplement to the environmental
impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed supplement,
comments should be as specific as
possible. It is also helpful if comments
refer to specific pages of the draft
supplement to the statement. Comments
may also address the adequacy of the
draft supplement or the merits of the
disclosure formulated and discussed in
this supplement. Reviewers may wish to
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 241 / Monday, December 15, 2008 / Notices
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21.
Responsible Official
Robert G. MacWhorter, Forest
Supervisor, Dixie National Forest, 1789
N. Wedgewood Lane, Cedar City, Utah
84721.
Dated: December 4, 2008.
Robert G. MacWhorter,
Forest Supervisor
[FR Doc. E8–29429 Filed 12–12–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Export Trade Certificate of Review
ACTION: Notice of application to amend
an Export Trade Certificate of Review
issued to independent film & television
alliance.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
SUMMARY: Export Trading Company
Affairs (‘‘ETCA’’), International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, has received an application
to amend an Export Trade Certificate of
Review (‘‘Certificate’’). This notice
summarizes the proposed amendment
and requests comments relevant to
whether the Certificate should be
issued.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Anspacher, Director, Export
Trading Company Affairs, International
Trade Administration, (202) 482–5131
(this is not a toll-free number) or e-mail
at oetca@ita.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of
the Export Trading Company Act of
1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001–21) authorizes the
Secretary of Commerce to issue Export
Trade Certificates of Review. An Export
Trade Certificate of Review protects the
holder and the members identified in
the Certificate from State and Federal
Government antitrust actions and from
private treble damage antitrust actions
for the export conduct specified in the
Certificate and carried out in
compliance with its terms and
conditions. Section 302(b)(1) of the
Export Trading Company Act of 1982
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:00 Dec 12, 2008
Jkt 217001
and 15 CFR 325.6(a) require the
Secretary to publish a notice in the
Federal Register identifying the
applicant and summarizing its proposed
export conduct.
Request for Public Comments
Interested parties may submit written
comments relevant to the determination
whether an amended Certificate should
be issued. If the comments include any
privileged or confidential business
information, it must be clearly marked
and a non-confidential version of the
comments (identified as such) should be
included. Any comments not marked as
privileged or confidential business
information will be deemed to be nonconfidential. An original and five (5)
copies, plus two (2) copies of the nonconfidential version, should be
submitted no later than 20 days after the
date of this notice to: Export Trading
Company Affairs, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Room 7021–B H,
Washington, DC 20230. Information
submitted by any person is exempt from
disclosure under the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552).
However, non-confidential versions of
the comments will be made available to
the applicant if necessary for
determining whether or not to issue the
Certificate. Comments should refer to
this application as ‘‘Export Trade
Certificate of Review, application
number 87–8A001.’’
A summary of the application for an
amendment follows.
Summary of the Application:
Applicant: Independent Film &
Television Alliance (‘‘IFTA’’), 10850
Wilshire Blvd., 9th Floor, Los Angeles,
CA 90024.
Contact: Jerald A. Jacobs, Attorney to
IFTA, Telephone: (202) 663–8011.
Application No.: 87–8A001.
Date Deemed Submitted: December 1,
2008.
The original IFTA Certificate was
issued on April 10, 1987 (52 FR 12578,
April 17, 1987), and last amended on
August 6, 2003 (68 FR 48342, August
13, 2003).
Proposed Amendment: IFTA seeks to
amend its Certificate to:
1. Change name of the Certificate
holder from ‘‘American Film Marketing
Association’’ to the new listing
‘‘Independent Film & Television
Alliance’’.
2. Add each of the following
companies as a new ‘‘Member’’ of the
Certificate within the meaning of
section 325.2(1) of the Regulations (15
CFR 325.2(1)):
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75999
111 Pictures Ltd, London, United
Kingdom.
2929 International, LLC, Beverly Hills,
CA.
Action Concept Film und
Stuntproduktion GmbH, Huerth/
Cologne, Germany.
Alliance Group Entertainment, Las
Vegas, NV.
Alpine Pictures, Inc., Burbank, CA.
American Cinema International, Van
Nuys, CA.
American World Pictures, Encino, CA.
Artist View Entertainment, Inc., Studio
City, CA.
AV Pictures Ltd, London, United
Kingdom.
Bleiberg Entertainment, Beverly Hills,
CA.
Boll AG, Mainz, Germany.
Bold Films L.P., Los Angeles, CA.
Brainstorm Media, Beverly Hills, CA.
Brightlight Pictures, Inc., Burnaby,
Canada.
Capella International, Inc., Los Angeles,
CA.
Celluloid Dreams, Paris, France.
Cinamour Entertainment, Encino, CA.
Cine Excel Entertainment, Inc., Gardena,
CA.
Cinema Management Group, West
Hollywood, CA.
Cinesavvy, Inc., Toronto, Canada.
CJ Entertainment, Inc., Seoul, Republic
of (South) Korea.
Classic Media, Inc., New York, NY.
Comerica Entertainment Group, Los
Angeles, CA.
ContentFilm International, London,
United Kingdom.
Continental Entertainment Capital,
Beverly Hills, CA.
DeAPlaneta, Barcelona, Spain.
Distribution Workshop, Kowloon Tong,
Hong Kong.
E! Entertainment Television Networks,
Los Angeles, CA.
Ealing Studios International, London,
United Kingdom.
Echo Bridge Entertainment, Needham,
MA.
Emperor Motion Pictures, Wanchai,
Hong Kong.
Epic Pictures Group, Inc., Beverly Hills,
CA.
Essential Entertainment, Los Angeles,
CA.
EuropaCorp, Paris, France.
Fabrication Films, Los Angeles, CA.
Film Department (The), West
Hollywood, CA.
First California Bank, Los Angeles, CA.
First Look Studios, Century City, CA.
Foresight Unlimited, Bel Air, CA.
Freemantle Corp. (The), Toronto,
Canada.
Fries Film Group, Inc., Woodland Hills,
CA.
Gaumont, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 241 (Monday, December 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75998-75999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-29429]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Escalante Ranger District, Dixie National Forest; UT; Pockets
Resource Management Forest Service, USDA
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a supplement to the final
environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service announces its intent to prepare a
supplement to the Pockets Resource Management Project (PRMP) Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). PRMP FEIS evaluated alternatives
for vegetation management and associated road improvements within the
Englemann spruce/subalpine fir and aspen forest types on the Escalante
Ranger District, Dixie National Forest. The original proposed action
and subsequent analysis disclosed in the FEIS remains unchanged. The
purpose of this supplement is to provide additional analysis and
disclosure on the effects of the proposed action on unroaded and
undeveloped areas identified on a 2005 draft map produced during forest
plan revision as part of a required inventory and evaluation of areas
with wilderness potential. This analysis will focus on the impacts to
the wilderness attributes of the three areas being affected by the
proposed action.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by February 15, 2009. The draft supplement to the final environmental
impact statement is expected in March 2009 and the final environmental
impact statement is expected May 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Georgina Lampman, District Ranger,
P.O. Box 246, Escalante, Utah 84726. Written comments should be
specific and should be limited to the scope of this supplement. If you
do not have any comments, but wish to remain on the mailing list for
this proposal, please send a letter to the above address, or e-mail
address listed below and request to be kept informed about the
proposal. An e-mail comment mailbox is established for receiving
comments electronically at: comments-intermtn-dixie-
escalante@fs.fed.us. Please use the project name (Pockets Resource
Management Project) as the subject line in your e-mail comment message.
Electronic comments must be submitted in a format such as an e-mail
message, plain text (.txt), rich text format (.rtf), or Word (.doc).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mail written correspondence to
Marianne Orton, Interdisciplinary Team Leader, Powell Ranger Station,
P.O. Box 80, Panguitch, Utah 84759.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
On June 16, 2006 a Notice of Intent to prepare an environmental
impact statement for the Pockets Resource Management Project (PRMP) was
published in the Federal Register. In November 2007 the Notice of
Availability of the draft environmental impact statement for the PRMP
was published in the Federal Register. On July 14, 2008, Robert
MacWhorter, Dixie National Forest Supervisor, signed the Record of
Decision for the Pockets Resource Management Project Final
Environmental Impact Statement and the NOA was published on August 1,
2008. Three organizations including Utah Environmental Congress, Forest
Guardians, and Sierra Club, Utah Chapter, appealed Forest Supervisor
Robert MacWhorter's decision stating a lack of disclosure on impacts to
areas with wilderness potential.
Forest Supervisor Robert MacWhorter withdrew the decision in
October 2008 and directed the PRMP Interdisciplinary Team to prepare a
Supplement to the FEIS that discloses the impacts to the wilderness
potential of the Pacer Lake, Antimony, and Dry Lake areas inventoried
during forest plan revision. The Record of Decision for the SEIS will
be appealable under 36 CFR 215 and should only address those items
pertinent to the disclosure of effects to the wilderness attributes of
these areas.
Comment Requested
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft supplement to the final environmental
impact statement will be prepared for comment. The comment period on
the draft supplement will be 45 days from the date the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal
Register. The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is
important to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to
public participation in the environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may
be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings,
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45 day comment period so that timely
comments and objections are made available to the Forest Service at a
time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the
final supplement to the environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed supplement, comments should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to specific pages of
the draft supplement to the statement. Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft supplement or the merits of the disclosure
formulated and discussed in this supplement. Reviewers may wish to
[[Page 75999]]
refer to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for
implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environmental
Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal
and will be available for public inspection.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21.
Responsible Official
Robert G. MacWhorter, Forest Supervisor, Dixie National Forest,
1789 N. Wedgewood Lane, Cedar City, Utah 84721.
Dated: December 4, 2008.
Robert G. MacWhorter,
Forest Supervisor
[FR Doc. E8-29429 Filed 12-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M