Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority; Notice of Public Hearing, 75808-75809 [E8-29419]
Download as PDF
75808
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 240 / Friday, December 12, 2008 / Notices
drivers submit comments by January 12,
2009.
FMCSA believes that the
requirements for a renewal of an
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315 can be satisfied by initially
granting the renewal and then
requesting and evaluating, if needed,
subsequent comments submitted by
interested parties. As indicated above,
the Agency previously published
notices of final disposition announcing
its decision to exempt these 12
individuals from the vision requirement
in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). The final
decision to grant an exemption to each
of these individuals was based on the
merits of each case and only after
careful consideration of the comments
received to its notices of applications.
The notices of applications stated in
detail the qualifications, experience,
and medical condition of each applicant
for an exemption from the vision
requirements. That information is
available by consulting the above cited
Federal Register publications.
Interested parties or organizations
possessing information that would
otherwise show that any, or all of these
drivers, are not currently achieving the
statutory level of safety should
immediately notify FMCSA. The
Agency will evaluate any adverse
evidence submitted and, if safety is
being compromised or if continuation of
the exemption would not be consistent
with the goals and objectives of 49
U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA will
take immediate steps to revoke the
exemption of a driver.
Issued on: December 5, 2008.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. E8–29416 Filed 12–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA–2006–25040]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Capital Metropolitan Transportation
Authority; Notice of Public Hearing
On August 8, 2006, the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA)
published a notice (Notice) in the
Federal Register announcing Capital
Metropolitan Authority’s (CMTA)
request for a waiver of compliance from
certain provisions of Title 49 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for
the operation of a new planned
Commuter Rail Service (CRS) that will
share trackage with the Austin Area
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:56 Dec 11, 2008
Jkt 217001
Terminal Railroad (AUAR), a common
carrier freight railroad. As explained in
the Notice, CMTA is constructing a 32mile rail system (27 miles shared with
AUAR) linking the City of Leander,
Texas, with downtown Austin, TX.
CMTA plans to utilize temporal
separation of freight and passenger
operations on the shared trackage and a
light rail style, non-FRA compliant
Diesel-Multiple Unit (DMU) vehicle in
order to offer a ‘‘ ‘one seat ride’
operating on both the CMTA mainline
and in city streets with tight curvature.’’
As detailed in the Notice, CMTA
seeks a waiver of compliance from
certain regulatory provisions of 49 CFR
parts 219 (Control of Alcohol and Drug
Use), 221 (Rear end marking device),
223 (Safety glazing standards), 225
(Railroad accident/incident reporting),
229 (Railroad locomotive safety
standards), 231 (Railroad safety
appliance standards), 238 (Passenger
equipment safety standards), 239
(Passenger train emergency
preparedness) and 240 (Qualification
and certification of locomotive
engineers).
Noting that certain provisions in 49
CFR part 231 pertaining to safety
appliances are statutorily required, and
therefore not subject to FRA’s waiver
authority, CMTA also requests that FRA
exercise its authority under 49 U.S.C.
20306 to exempt CMTA from certain
provisions of Chapter 203, Title 49, of
the United States Code because the
‘‘CMTA DMU vehicles will be equipped
with their own array of safety devices
resulting in equivalent safety.’’
Specifically, CMTA requests that for
purposes of its planned CRS system,
FRA exempt it from the requirements of
49 U.S.C. 20302 mandating that railroad
vehicles be equipped with (1)
Handbrakes, (2) sill steps; and (3) side
and end handholds.
CMTA indicates that the DMU
vehicles it plans to utilize for its CRS
service are equipped with automatic
spring applied parking brakes, as
opposed to conventional hand brakes as
required by Section 20302. CMTA
further indicates that the parking brakes
will be controlled by the one-person
crew operating the vehicle from control
stands within the vehicle and that the
parking brakes are capable of holding a
vehicle on a six percent grade at an 84.5
ton load. Accordingly, CMTA states the
parking brake of its DMU vehicles
serves the same purpose of a
conventional hand brake, but in a
manner that provides an equivalent or
superior level of safety.
CMTA further indicates that sill steps
(required by Section 20302) are not
necessary for safety on the DMU
PO 00000
Frm 00144
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
vehicles and would not enhance the
safety of the vehicles. Specifically,
CMTA explains that the door threshold
of the vehicles is 23.5 inches above the
top of the rail, and such configuration
renders still steps unnecessary.
CMTA also indicates that side and
end handholds (required by Section
20302) are not necessary for safety on its
DMU vehicles and in fact, such
appliances might present a safety hazard
in the street-running environment of its
planned CRS system. Specifically,
noting that handholds are typically
intended for use by crew members
performing yard and service duties,
CMTA notes that its operations will not
involve any such activities from
positions outside and adjacent to the
vehicle or near vehicle doors. Instead,
CMTA indicates that yard moves will be
controlled from the control stand within
the vehicle by the on-board operator and
switches will be hand thrown.
Therefore, CMTA notes that there is no
need for personnel to mount or
dismount the vehicles using external
appliances of any kind. Further, CMTA
expresses reservation about installing
external handholds because of the
street-running characteristics of its
planned CRS service noting that such
appliances would give pedestrians ‘‘the
opportunity to grab onto something on
the outside of the vehicle with the
intention to hitch an unlawful,’’ and
unsafe, ride.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 20306,
FRA may exempt CMTA from the above
statutory requirements based on
evidence received and findings
developed at a hearing demonstrating
that the statutory requirements
‘‘preclude the development or
implementation of more efficient
railroad transportation equipment or
other transportation innovations under
existing law.’’ Accordingly, in order to
receive evidence and develop findings
to determine whether FRA should
invoke its discretionary authority under
49 U.S.C. 20306 in this instance, a
public hearing is scheduled to begin at
9 a.m. on Thursday, January 8, 2009, at
the Hilton Garden Inn located at 815
14th Street, NW., in Washington, DC.
Interested parties are invited to present
oral statements at the hearing. The
hearing will be informal and will be
conducted by a representative
designated by FRA in accordance with
FRA’s Rules of Practice (49 CFR 211.25).
The hearing will be a non-adversarial
proceeding; therefore, there will be no
cross examination of persons presenting
statements. FRA representative will
make an opening statement outlining
the scope of the hearing. After all initial
statements have been completed, those
E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM
12DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 240 / Friday, December 12, 2008 / Notices
persons wishing to make a brief rebuttal
will be given the opportunity to do so
in the same order in which initial
statements were made. Additional
procedures, as necessary for the conduct
of the hearing, will be announced at the
hearing.
The petitioners should be present at
the hearing and prepared to present
evidence that any requirements of
Chapter 203, title 49, United States
Code, for which exemption is sought to
‘‘preclude the development or
implementation of more efficient
railroad transportation equipment or
other transportation innovations under
existing law.’’
Issued in Washington, DC on December 8,
2008.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E8–29419 Filed 12–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Docket No. AB–33 (Sub-No. 267X)]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Union Pacific Railroad Company—
Abandonment Exemption—in
Comanche County, OK
Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP)
has filed a notice of exemption under 49
CFR 1152 Subpart F—Exempt
Abandonments to abandon, and
discontinue its lease operation over a
3.85-mile line of railroad known as the
Lawton Industrial Lead, extending from
milepost 50.75, near Fort Sill, to
milepost 54.60, south of Lawton, in
Comanche County, OK. The line
traverses United States Postal Service
Zip Code 73503.1
UP has certified that: (1) No local
traffic has moved over the line for at
least 2 years; (2) there is no overhead
traffic on the line; (3) no formal
complaint filed by a user of rail service
on the line (or by a state or local
government entity acting on behalf of
such user) regarding cessation of service
over the line either is pending with the
Surface Transportation Board or with
any U.S. District Court or has been
decided in favor of complainant within
the 2-year period; and (4) the
requirements at 49 CFR 1105.7
(environmental reports), 49 CFR 1105.8
(historic reports), 49 CFR 1105.11
(transmittal letter), 49 CFR 1105.12
1 The line is owned by the State of Oklahoma
which holds no residual common carrier obligation.
The line does contain federally granted right-ofway.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:56 Dec 11, 2008
Jkt 217001
(newspaper publication), and 49 CFR
1152.50(d)(1) (notice to governmental
agencies) have been met.
As a condition to this exemption, any
employee adversely affected by the
abandonment shall be protected under
Oregon Short Line R. Co.—
Abandonment—Goshen, 360 I.C.C. 91
(1979). To address whether this
condition adequately protects affected
employees, a petition for partial
revocation under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
must be filed.
Provided no formal expression of
intent to file an offer of financial
assistance (OFA) has been received, this
exemption will be effective on January
13, 2009, unless stayed pending
reconsideration. Petitions to stay that do
not involve environmental issues,2
formal expressions of intent to file an
OFA under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(2),3 and
trail use/rail banking requests under 49
CFR 1152.29 must be filed by December
22, 2008. Petitions to reopen or requests
for public use conditions under 49 CFR
1152.28 must be filed by January 2,
2009, with: Surface Transportation
Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20423–0001.
A copy of any petition filed with the
Board should be sent to UP’s
representative: Mack H. Shumate, Jr.,
Senior General Attorney, 101 North
Wacker Drive, Room 1920, Chicago, IL
60606.
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio.
UP has filed a combined
environmental and historic report
addressing the effects, if any, of the
abandonment on the environment and
historic resources. SEA will issue an
environmental assessment (EA) by
December 19, 2008. Interested persons
may obtain a copy of the EA by writing
to SEA (Room 1100, Surface
Transportation Board, Washington, DC
20423–0001) or by calling SEA, at (202)
245–0305. [Assistance for the hearing
impaired is available through the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339.] Comments
on environmental and historic
preservation matters must be filed
2 The Board will grant a stay if an informed
decision on environmental issues (whether raised
by a party or by the Board’s Section of
Environmental Analysis (SEA) in its independent
investigation) cannot be made before the
exemption’s effective date. See Exemption of Outof-Service Rail Lines, 5 I.C.C.2d 377 (1989). Any
request for a stay should be filed as soon as possible
so that the Board may take appropriate action before
the exemption’s effective date.
3 Each OFA must be accompanied by the filing
fee, which currently is set at $1,500. See 49 CFR
1002.2(f)(25).
PO 00000
Frm 00145
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75809
within 15 days after the EA becomes
available to the public.
Environmental, historic preservation,
public use, or trail use/rail banking
conditions will be imposed, where
appropriate, in a subsequent decision.
Pursuant to the provisions of 49 CFR
1152.29(e)(2), UP shall file a notice of
consummation with the Board to signify
that it has exercised the authority
granted and fully abandoned the line. If
consummation has not been effected by
UP’s filing of a notice of consummation
by December 12, 2009, and there are no
legal or regulatory barriers to
consummation, the authority to
abandon will automatically expire.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: December 5, 2008.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E8–29430 Filed 12–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 35204]
Watco Companies, Inc.—Continuance
in Control Exemption—Alabama
Warrior Railway, L.L.C.
Watco Companies, Inc. (Watco), a
noncarrier, has filed a verified notice of
exemption to continue in control of
Alabama Warrior Railway, L.L.C.
(AWR), upon AWR’s becoming a Class
III rail carrier.1
This transaction is related to a
concurrently filed verified notice of
exemption in STB Finance Docket No.
35203, Alabama Warrior Railway,
L.L.C.—Operation Exemption—Sloss
Industries Corporation and Jefferson
Warrior Railroad Company, Inc. In that
proceeding, AWR seeks an exemption
under 49 CFR 1150.31 to operate
approximately 24.575 miles of rail lines
owned by Sloss Industries Corporation
and Jefferson Warrior Railroad
Company, Inc. (JWR) in Birmingham,
AL. Also, JWR will assign its operating
rights to AWR over approximately
1,532.1 feet of rail line owned by BNSF
Railway Company in Birmingham.
The parties intend to consummate the
transaction on or shortly after December
26, 2008, the effective date of the
exemption.
1 Watco owns 100% of the issued and outstanding
stock of AWR.
E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM
12DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 240 (Friday, December 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75808-75809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-29419]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA-2006-25040]
Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority; Notice of Public
Hearing
On August 8, 2006, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
published a notice (Notice) in the Federal Register announcing Capital
Metropolitan Authority's (CMTA) request for a waiver of compliance from
certain provisions of Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
for the operation of a new planned Commuter Rail Service (CRS) that
will share trackage with the Austin Area Terminal Railroad (AUAR), a
common carrier freight railroad. As explained in the Notice, CMTA is
constructing a 32-mile rail system (27 miles shared with AUAR) linking
the City of Leander, Texas, with downtown Austin, TX. CMTA plans to
utilize temporal separation of freight and passenger operations on the
shared trackage and a light rail style, non-FRA compliant Diesel-
Multiple Unit (DMU) vehicle in order to offer a `` `one seat ride'
operating on both the CMTA mainline and in city streets with tight
curvature.''
As detailed in the Notice, CMTA seeks a waiver of compliance from
certain regulatory provisions of 49 CFR parts 219 (Control of Alcohol
and Drug Use), 221 (Rear end marking device), 223 (Safety glazing
standards), 225 (Railroad accident/incident reporting), 229 (Railroad
locomotive safety standards), 231 (Railroad safety appliance
standards), 238 (Passenger equipment safety standards), 239 (Passenger
train emergency preparedness) and 240 (Qualification and certification
of locomotive engineers).
Noting that certain provisions in 49 CFR part 231 pertaining to
safety appliances are statutorily required, and therefore not subject
to FRA's waiver authority, CMTA also requests that FRA exercise its
authority under 49 U.S.C. 20306 to exempt CMTA from certain provisions
of Chapter 203, Title 49, of the United States Code because the ``CMTA
DMU vehicles will be equipped with their own array of safety devices
resulting in equivalent safety.'' Specifically, CMTA requests that for
purposes of its planned CRS system, FRA exempt it from the requirements
of 49 U.S.C. 20302 mandating that railroad vehicles be equipped with
(1) Handbrakes, (2) sill steps; and (3) side and end handholds.
CMTA indicates that the DMU vehicles it plans to utilize for its
CRS service are equipped with automatic spring applied parking brakes,
as opposed to conventional hand brakes as required by Section 20302.
CMTA further indicates that the parking brakes will be controlled by
the one-person crew operating the vehicle from control stands within
the vehicle and that the parking brakes are capable of holding a
vehicle on a six percent grade at an 84.5 ton load. Accordingly, CMTA
states the parking brake of its DMU vehicles serves the same purpose of
a conventional hand brake, but in a manner that provides an equivalent
or superior level of safety.
CMTA further indicates that sill steps (required by Section 20302)
are not necessary for safety on the DMU vehicles and would not enhance
the safety of the vehicles. Specifically, CMTA explains that the door
threshold of the vehicles is 23.5 inches above the top of the rail, and
such configuration renders still steps unnecessary.
CMTA also indicates that side and end handholds (required by
Section 20302) are not necessary for safety on its DMU vehicles and in
fact, such appliances might present a safety hazard in the street-
running environment of its planned CRS system. Specifically, noting
that handholds are typically intended for use by crew members
performing yard and service duties, CMTA notes that its operations will
not involve any such activities from positions outside and adjacent to
the vehicle or near vehicle doors. Instead, CMTA indicates that yard
moves will be controlled from the control stand within the vehicle by
the on-board operator and switches will be hand thrown. Therefore, CMTA
notes that there is no need for personnel to mount or dismount the
vehicles using external appliances of any kind. Further, CMTA expresses
reservation about installing external handholds because of the street-
running characteristics of its planned CRS service noting that such
appliances would give pedestrians ``the opportunity to grab onto
something on the outside of the vehicle with the intention to hitch an
unlawful,'' and unsafe, ride.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 20306, FRA may exempt CMTA from the
above statutory requirements based on evidence received and findings
developed at a hearing demonstrating that the statutory requirements
``preclude the development or implementation of more efficient railroad
transportation equipment or other transportation innovations under
existing law.'' Accordingly, in order to receive evidence and develop
findings to determine whether FRA should invoke its discretionary
authority under 49 U.S.C. 20306 in this instance, a public hearing is
scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. on Thursday, January 8, 2009, at the
Hilton Garden Inn located at 815 14th Street, NW., in Washington, DC.
Interested parties are invited to present oral statements at the
hearing. The hearing will be informal and will be conducted by a
representative designated by FRA in accordance with FRA's Rules of
Practice (49 CFR 211.25). The hearing will be a non-adversarial
proceeding; therefore, there will be no cross examination of persons
presenting statements. FRA representative will make an opening
statement outlining the scope of the hearing. After all initial
statements have been completed, those
[[Page 75809]]
persons wishing to make a brief rebuttal will be given the opportunity
to do so in the same order in which initial statements were made.
Additional procedures, as necessary for the conduct of the hearing,
will be announced at the hearing.
The petitioners should be present at the hearing and prepared to
present evidence that any requirements of Chapter 203, title 49, United
States Code, for which exemption is sought to ``preclude the
development or implementation of more efficient railroad transportation
equipment or other transportation innovations under existing law.''
Issued in Washington, DC on December 8, 2008.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program
Development.
[FR Doc. E8-29419 Filed 12-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P