Findings of Scientific Misconduct, 75119-75120 [E8-29203]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 10, 2008 / Notices
(NIOSH), Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice.
2008, as provided for under 42 U.S.C.
7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS
designated the following class of
employees as an addition to the SEC:
SUMMARY: The Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) gives notice as
required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a
decision to evaluate a petition to
designate a class of employees at the
Vitro Manufacturing in Canonsburg,
Pennsylvania, to be included in the
Special Exposure Cohort under the
Energy Employees Occupational Illness
Compensation Program Act of 2000. The
initial proposed definition for the class
being evaluated, subject to revision as
warranted by the evaluation, is as
follows:
Facility: Vitro Manufacturing.
Location: Canonsburg, Pennsylvania.
Job Titles and/or Job Duties: All
Atomic Weapons Employer employees.
Period of Employment: August 13,
1942 through December 31, 1957.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Larry Elliott, Director, Office of
Compensation Analysis and Support,
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676
Columbia Parkway, MS C–46,
Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 513–
533–6800 (this is not a toll-free
number). Information requests can also
be submitted by e-mail to
OCAS@CDC.GOV.
This designation became effective on
November 23, 2008, as provided for
under 42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)(C). Hence,
beginning on November 23, 2008,
members of this class of employees,
defined as reported in this notice,
became members of the Special
Exposure Cohort.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Larry Elliott, Director, Office of
Compensation Analysis and Support,
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676
Columbia Parkway, MS C–46,
Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 513–
533–6800 (this is not a toll-free
number). Information requests can also
be submitted by e-mail to
OCAS@CDC.GOV.
Dated: December 4, 2008.
Christine M. Branche,
Acting Director, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E8–29244 Filed 12–9–08; 8:45 am]
Dated: December 5, 2008.
Christine M. Branche,
Acting Director, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E8–29246 Filed 12–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–19–P
BILLING CODE 4163–19–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health
Office of the Secretary
Findings of Scientific Misconduct
Final Effect of Designation of a Class
of Employees for Addition to the
Special Exposure Cohort
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) gives notice
concerning the final effect of the HHS
decision to designate a class of
employees at Connecticut Aircraft
Nuclear Engine Laboratory in
Middletown, Connecticut, as an
addition to the Special Exposure Cohort
(SEC) under the Energy Employees
Occupational Illness Compensation
Program Act of 2000. On October 24,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Dec 09, 2008
Jkt 217001
All employees of the Department of Energy
(DOE), its predecessor agencies, and DOE
contractors or subcontractors who worked at
the Connecticut Aircraft Nuclear Engine
Laboratory in Middletown, CT, from January
1, 1958 through December 31, 1965 for a
number of work days aggregating at least 250
work days occurring either solely under this
employment or in combination with work
days within the parameters established for
one or more other classes of employees in the
Special Exposure Cohort.
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the Office of Research Integrity (ORI)
and the Assistant Secretary for Health
have taken final action in the following
case:
Homer D. Venters, Jr., M.D.,
University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign: Based on the report of an
investigation conducted by the
University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign (UIUC) and extensive
additional image analysis conducted by
the Office of Research Integrity (ORI),
the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS)
found that Dr. Homer D. Venters, former
graduate student, Neuroscience
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75119
Program, UIUC, engaged in scientific
misconduct in research supported by
National Institute of Mental Health
(NIMH), National Institutes of Health
(NIH), awards R01 MH051569 and F30
MH12558 and National Institute on
Aging (NIA), NIH, award R01 AG06246.
Specifically, PHS found that the
Respondent committed misconduct in
science:
• By intentionally and knowingly
preparing and including duplicate
image data in Figures 5 and 10 of PHS
fellowship application F31 MH12558,
‘‘Neurodegeneration via TNF-alpha
inhibition of IGF–1,’’ submitted in 1999,
which was funded as F30 MH12558
from June 1, 2000, to May 31, 2003.
Because the duplicate data were labeled
as having been obtained from different
experiments, the results for at least one
of the two figures were intentionally
falsified and constitute an act of
scientific misconduct.
• By intentionally and knowingly
preparing and including duplicate
image data in Figure 3 and/or 4 of a
manuscript submitted and published as:
Venters, H.D., et al. ‘‘A New Mechanism
of Neurodegeneration: A
Proinflammatory Cytokine Inhibits
Receptor Signaling by a Survival
Peptide.’’ Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 96:9879–
9884, 1999.
• By preparing and providing to his
dissertation committee in March 2000 a
thesis proposal entitled ‘‘An Alternate
Mechanism of Neurodegeneration:
Silencing of Insulin-like Growth FactorI survival signals by Tumor Necrosis
Factor-a,’’ which contained five falsified
figures: Figures 1.3, 1.4a, 2.1b, 2.3e, and
2.5b. In each figure, he reused data
within the same figure or in another
thesis proposal figure as representing
differently treated samples or as data
obtained with different immunoblotting
antisera.
• In March and April 2001,
Respondent included several of the
same falsified figures as in the thesis
proposal and multiple additional
falsified figures in his dissertation
‘‘Silencing of Insulin-like Growth Factor
I Neuronal Survival Signals by Tumor
Necrosis Factor-a.’’ In all, Figures 3.3,
3.4a, 3.4b, 4.1b, 4.3a, 4.5b, 5.1a, 5.2,
5.4a, 5.5a, 5.6a, 5.7a, and 5.8a were
falsified. In each instance, he assembled
figures by reusing significant data, on
some occasions after manipulating the
orientation of the data, either within the
same figure or in other figures related to
his thesis and represented the data
falsely as coming from different samples
or different experiments.
Dr. Venters has entered into a
Voluntary Settlement Agreement
E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM
10DEN1
75120
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 10, 2008 / Notices
(Agreement) in which he has voluntarily
agreed, for a period of three (3) years,
beginning on November 19, 2008:
(1) That any institution that submits
an application for PHS support for a
research project on which the
Respondent’s participation is proposed
or that uses the Respondent in any
capacity on PHS-supported research, or
that submits a report of PHS-funded
research in which the Respondent is
involved, must concurrently submit a
plan for monitoring of the Respondent’s
research to the funding agency and ORI
for approval; the monitoring plan must
be designed to ensure the scientific
integrity of the Respondent’s research
contribution; Respondent agreed that he
will not participate in any PHSsupported research until such a
monitoring plan is submitted to ORI and
the funding agency;
(2) That Respondent will ensure that
any institution employing him will
submit to ORI, in conjunction with each
application for PHS funds or report,
manuscript, or abstract of PHS-funded
research in which the Respondent is
involved, a certification that the data
provided by the Respondent are based
on actual experiments or are otherwise
legitimately derived, and that the data
analyses, procedures, and methodology
are accurately reported in the
application or report; Respondent must
ensure that the institution sends a copy
of each certification to ORI; and
(3) To exclude himself from serving in
any advisory capacity to PHS, including
but not limited to service on any PHS
advisory committee, board, and/or peer
review committee, or as a consultant or
contractor to PHS.
Respondent also voluntarily agreed
that within 30 days of the effective date
of this Agreement:
(4) He will submit a letter to the
journal editor, with copies to his
coauthors, identifying his falsification of
Figures 3 and/or 4 in the following
article: Venters et al. ‘‘A New
Mechanism of Neurodegeneration: A
Proinflammatory Cytokine Inhibits
Receptor Signaling by a Survival
Peptide.’’ Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences 96:9879–9884,
1999.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Director, Division of Investigative
Oversight, Office of Research Integrity,
1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 750,
Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 453–8800.
Chris B. Pascal,
Director, Office of Research Integrity.
[FR Doc. E8–29203 Filed 12–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources And Services
Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection:
Comment Request
In compliance with the requirement
for opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects
(section 3506(c)(2)(A) of Title 44, United
States Code, as amended by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub.
L. 104–13), the Health Resources and
Services Administration (HRSA)
publishes periodic summaries of
proposed projects being developed for
submission to OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. To
request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and draft
instruments, call the HRSA Reports
Clearance Officer on (301) 443–1129.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Proposed Project: Health Centers
Patient Survey—(NEW)
The Health Center program supports
Community Health Centers (CHCs),
Migrant Health Centers (MHCs), Health
Care for the Homeless (HCH) projects,
and Public Housing Primary Care
(PHPC) programs. Health Centers (HCs)
receive grants from HRSA to provide
primary and preventive health care
services to medically underserved
populations.
The proposed Patient Survey will
collect in-depth information about HC
patients, their health status, the reasons
they seek care at HCs, their diagnoses,
the services they utilize at HCs and
elsewhere, the quality of those services,
and their satisfaction with the care they
receive, through personal interviews of
a stratified random sample of HC
patients. Interviews are planned to take
approximately 1 hour and six minutes
each.
The Patient Survey builds on previous
periodic User-Visit Surveys which were
conducted to learn about the process
and outcomes of care in CHCs and HCH
projects. The original questionnaires
were derived from the National Health
Interview Survey (NHIS) and the
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical
Care Survey (NHAMCS) conducted by
the National Center for Health Statistics
(NCHS). Conformance with the NHIS
and NHAMCS allowed comparisons
between these NCHS surveys and the
previous CHC and HCH User-Visit
Surveys. The new Patient Survey was
developed using a questionnaire
methodology similar to that used in the
past, and will also potentially allow
some longitudinal comparisons for
CHCs and HCH projects with the
previous User-Visit survey data,
including monitoring of process
outcomes over time. In addition, this
survey will include interviews of
patients drawn from migrant
populations and from residents of
public housing, populations not
included in the previous surveys.
The estimated response burden for the
survey is as follows:
SURVEY
Number of
respondents
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Type of respondent; activity involved
Responses
per respondent
Total number of
responses
Burden per
response
(hours)
Total hour
burden
Grantee/Site Recruitment and Site Training ..
Patient Recruitment ........................................
Patient Survey 4526 .......................................
115
5658
4526
3
1
1
345
5658
4526
3.75
.167
1.1
1294
945
4979
Total .........................................................
5773
............................
10529
..............................
7218
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Dec 09, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM
10DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75119-75120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-29203]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
Findings of Scientific Misconduct
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Office of Research Integrity
(ORI) and the Assistant Secretary for Health have taken final action in
the following case:
Homer D. Venters, Jr., M.D., University of Illinois at Urbana-
Champaign: Based on the report of an investigation conducted by the
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) and extensive
additional image analysis conducted by the Office of Research Integrity
(ORI), the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) found that Dr. Homer D.
Venters, former graduate student, Neuroscience Program, UIUC, engaged
in scientific misconduct in research supported by National Institute of
Mental Health (NIMH), National Institutes of Health (NIH), awards R01
MH051569 and F30 MH12558 and National Institute on Aging (NIA), NIH,
award R01 AG06246.
Specifically, PHS found that the Respondent committed misconduct in
science:
By intentionally and knowingly preparing and including
duplicate image data in Figures 5 and 10 of PHS fellowship application
F31 MH12558, ``Neurodegeneration via TNF-alpha inhibition of IGF-1,''
submitted in 1999, which was funded as F30 MH12558 from June 1, 2000,
to May 31, 2003. Because the duplicate data were labeled as having been
obtained from different experiments, the results for at least one of
the two figures were intentionally falsified and constitute an act of
scientific misconduct.
By intentionally and knowingly preparing and including
duplicate image data in Figure 3 and/or 4 of a manuscript submitted and
published as: Venters, H.D., et al. ``A New Mechanism of
Neurodegeneration: A Proinflammatory Cytokine Inhibits Receptor
Signaling by a Survival Peptide.'' Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences U.S.A. 96:9879-9884, 1999.
By preparing and providing to his dissertation committee
in March 2000 a thesis proposal entitled ``An Alternate Mechanism of
Neurodegeneration: Silencing of Insulin-like Growth Factor-I survival
signals by Tumor Necrosis Factor-[alpha],'' which contained five
falsified figures: Figures 1.3, 1.4a, 2.1b, 2.3e, and 2.5b. In each
figure, he reused data within the same figure or in another thesis
proposal figure as representing differently treated samples or as data
obtained with different immunoblotting antisera.
In March and April 2001, Respondent included several of
the same falsified figures as in the thesis proposal and multiple
additional falsified figures in his dissertation ``Silencing of
Insulin-like Growth Factor I Neuronal Survival Signals by Tumor
Necrosis Factor-[alpha].'' In all, Figures 3.3, 3.4a, 3.4b, 4.1b, 4.3a,
4.5b, 5.1a, 5.2, 5.4a, 5.5a, 5.6a, 5.7a, and 5.8a were falsified. In
each instance, he assembled figures by reusing significant data, on
some occasions after manipulating the orientation of the data, either
within the same figure or in other figures related to his thesis and
represented the data falsely as coming from different samples or
different experiments.
Dr. Venters has entered into a Voluntary Settlement Agreement
[[Page 75120]]
(Agreement) in which he has voluntarily agreed, for a period of three
(3) years, beginning on November 19, 2008:
(1) That any institution that submits an application for PHS
support for a research project on which the Respondent's participation
is proposed or that uses the Respondent in any capacity on PHS-
supported research, or that submits a report of PHS-funded research in
which the Respondent is involved, must concurrently submit a plan for
monitoring of the Respondent's research to the funding agency and ORI
for approval; the monitoring plan must be designed to ensure the
scientific integrity of the Respondent's research contribution;
Respondent agreed that he will not participate in any PHS-supported
research until such a monitoring plan is submitted to ORI and the
funding agency;
(2) That Respondent will ensure that any institution employing him
will submit to ORI, in conjunction with each application for PHS funds
or report, manuscript, or abstract of PHS-funded research in which the
Respondent is involved, a certification that the data provided by the
Respondent are based on actual experiments or are otherwise
legitimately derived, and that the data analyses, procedures, and
methodology are accurately reported in the application or report;
Respondent must ensure that the institution sends a copy of each
certification to ORI; and
(3) To exclude himself from serving in any advisory capacity to
PHS, including but not limited to service on any PHS advisory
committee, board, and/or peer review committee, or as a consultant or
contractor to PHS.
Respondent also voluntarily agreed that within 30 days of the
effective date of this Agreement:
(4) He will submit a letter to the journal editor, with copies to
his coauthors, identifying his falsification of Figures 3 and/or 4 in
the following article: Venters et al. ``A New Mechanism of
Neurodegeneration: A Proinflammatory Cytokine Inhibits Receptor
Signaling by a Survival Peptide.'' Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences 96:9879-9884, 1999.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director, Division of Investigative
Oversight, Office of Research Integrity, 1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite
750, Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 453-8800.
Chris B. Pascal,
Director, Office of Research Integrity.
[FR Doc. E8-29203 Filed 12-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-31-P