Truth in Lending, 74989-74999 [E8-29123]
Download as PDF
74989
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 238
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 226
[Regulation Z; Docket No. R–1340]
Truth in Lending
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
public comment.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On July 30, 2008, the Board
published a final rule amending
Regulation Z, which implements the
Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and the
Home Ownership and Equity Protection
Act (HOEPA). The July 2008 final rule
requires creditors to give consumers
transaction-specific cost disclosures
shortly after application for closed-end
loans secured by a consumer’s principal
dwelling. The disclosures must be
provided before the consumer pays any
fee, other than a fee for obtaining the
consumer’s credit history. Also on July
30, 2008, the Congress enacted the
Housing and Economic Recovery Act of
2008, which included amendments to
TILA, known as the Mortgage Disclosure
Improvement Act of 2008 (MDIA). On
October 3, 2008, the Congress amended
the MDIA in connection with its
enactment of the Emergency Economic
Stabilization Act of 2008 (‘‘Stabilization
Act’’). The Board is now proposing
revisions to Regulation Z to implement
the provisions of the MDIA, as
amended.
The MDIA broadens and adds to the
requirements of the Board’s July 2008
final rule. Among other things, the
MDIA requires early, transactionspecific disclosures for mortgage loans
secured by dwellings other than the
consumer’s principal dwelling and
requires waiting periods between the
time when disclosures are given and
consummation of the transaction.
Moreover, these requirements of the
MDIA will become effective on July 30,
2009, about two months earlier than the
Board’s regulatory amendments adopted
in the July 2008 final rule.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Dec 09, 2008
Jkt 217001
Consistent with the MDIA, the
proposed amendments to Regulation Z
would require creditors to deliver good
faith estimates of the required mortgage
disclosures or place them in the mail no
later than three business days after
receiving a consumer’s application for a
dwelling-secured closed-end loan. The
delivery or mailing of these disclosures
would have to occur at least seven
business days before consummation. If
the annual percentage rate provided in
the good faith estimates changes beyond
a stated tolerance, creditors must
provide corrected disclosures, which
the consumer must receive at least three
business days before consummation of
the transaction. The proposal would
allow consumers to expedite
consummation to meet a bona fide
personal financial emergency. The
MDIA, as amended by the Stabilization
Act, specifies different requirements for
providing early disclosures for mortgage
transactions secured by a consumer’s
interest in a timeshare plan.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 23, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed amendments to
regulation Z, identified by Docket No.
R–1340, by any of the following
methods:
• Agency Web Site: https://
www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments at
https://www.federalreserve.gov/
generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail:
regs.comments@federalreserve.gov.
Include the docket number in the
subject line of the message.
• Fax: (202) 452–3819 or (202) 452–
3102.
• Mail: Address to Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary, Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20551.
All public comments will be made
available on the Board’s web site at
https://www.federalreserve.gov/
generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm as
submitted, unless modified for technical
reasons. Accordingly, comments will
not be edited to remove any identifying
or contact information. Public
comments may also be viewed
electronically or in paper in Room MP–
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
500 of the Board’s Martin Building (20th
and C Streets, NW) between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m. on weekdays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jamie Z. Goodson or Nikita M. Pastor,
Attorneys; Division of Consumer and
Community Affairs, Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System,
Washington, DC 20551, at (202) 452–
2412 or (202) 452–3667. For users of
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf
(TDD) only, contact (202) 263–4869.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
One of the purposes of the Truth in
Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. 1601 et
seq., is to promote the informed use of
consumer credit by requiring
disclosures about its terms and cost. The
act requires creditors to disclose the cost
of credit as a dollar amount (the finance
charge) and as an annual percentage rate
(APR). Uniformity in creditors’
disclosures is intended to assist
consumers in comparison shopping.
TILA requires additional disclosures for
loans secured by consumers’ homes and
permits consumers to rescind certain
transactions that involve their principal
dwelling.
TILA mandates that the Board
prescribe regulations to carry out the
purposes of the act. 15 U.S.C. 1604(a).
TILA is implemented by the Board’s
Regulation Z. 12 CFR part 226. An
Official Staff Commentary interprets the
requirements of the regulation and
provides guidance to creditors in
applying the rules to specific
transactions. 12 CFR part 226 (Supp. I).
TILA Section 128, 15 U.S.C. 1638,
requires creditors to make specified
disclosures in connection with closedend consumer credit transactions before
the credit is extended. Before enactment
of the MDIA, in connection with certain
mortgage loans, creditors were required
to make good faith estimates of such
disclosures (‘‘early disclosures’’) before
the credit is extended or within three
business days after the consumer has
submitted an application, whichever is
earlier. 15 U.S.C. 1638(b)(2). In
implementing TILA Section 128,
Regulation Z requires creditors to give
these early disclosures only for loans
that finance the purchase or initial
construction of a consumer’s principal
dwelling. On July 30, 2008, the Board
published a final rule amending
Regulation Z (the July 2008 final rule)
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
74990
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 10, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(73 FR 44522). The July 2008 final rule
requires, among other things, that a
creditor provide these early disclosures
even when the loan is not for the
purpose of financing the purchase or
initial construction of the principal
dwelling. Under the July 2008 final rule,
the early disclosures also must be
provided for non-purchase closed-end
loans secured by the consumer’s
principal dwelling (such as a refinance
loan). The July 2008 final rule also
required these disclosures to be given
before the consumer pays any fee, other
than a bona fide and reasonable fee for
reviewing credit history. As published,
these provisions of the July 2008 final
rule are scheduled to become effective
on October 1, 2009 (73 FR at 55494).
On the same day that the July 2008
final rule was published, Congress
amended TILA by enacting the Mortgage
Disclosure Improvement Act of 2008
(MDIA).1 The MDIA amends TILA and
codifies some of the early disclosure
requirements of the July 2008 final rule,
but also expands upon the regulatory
provisions.
Like the July 2008 final rule, the
MDIA requires creditors to make the
early disclosures even when the loan is
not for the purpose of financing the
purchase or initial construction of the
consumer’s principal dwelling and
prohibits the collection of fees before
the consumer receives the disclosures,
other than a fee for obtaining a
consumer’s credit history. However, the
MDIA applies these provisions to loans
secured by a dwelling even when it is
not the consumer’s principal dwelling.
Moreover, the MDIA imposes additional
requirements not contained in the July
2008 final rule. Under the MDIA, for
loans secured by a consumer’s dwelling,
creditors must deliver or mail the early
disclosures at least seven business days
before consummation. If the APR
contained in the early disclosures
becomes inaccurate (for example, due to
a change in the loan terms), creditors
must ‘‘redisclose’’ and provide corrected
disclosures that the consumer must
receive at least three business days
before consummation. The disclosures
also must inform consumers that they
are not obligated to complete the
transaction simply because disclosures
were provided or because the consumer
has applied for the loan. The MDIA
imposes different requirements for early
disclosure in closed-end mortgage
transactions that are secured by a
1 The
MDIA is contained in Sections 2501
through 2503 of the Housing and Economic
Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA), Pub. L. 110–289,
enacted on July 30, 2008. The MDIA was amended
by the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of
2008, Pub. L. 110–343, enacted on October 3, 2008.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Dec 09, 2008
Jkt 217001
consumer’s interest in a timeshare
plan.2 These provisions of the MDIA
will become effective on July 30, 2009,
which is about two months earlier than
the effective date of the July 2008 final
rule.
At this time, the Board is proposing
only to conform Regulation Z, as
amended on July 30, 2008, to the MDIA
provisions that become effective on July
30, 2009. The MDIA also contains
additional disclosure requirements for
variable-rate transactions that are not
addressed in this proposed rulemaking.
Those provisions of the MDIA will not
become effective until January 30, 2011,
or any earlier compliance date
ultimately established by the Board.
This proposal does not address those
disclosures. The Board anticipates
issuing proposed amendments to
Regulation Z to implement those
provisions of the MDIA during 2009, in
connection with the Board’s
comprehensive review of closed-end
mortgage disclosures that is currently
underway.
As discussed above, the MDIA
contains several provisions that mirror
the July 2008 final rule. These
provisions are not discussed below
because they are explained in detail in
the supplementary information portion
of the July 2008 final rule. (See 73 FR
44522; July 30, 2008). Final rules
adopting this proposal would become
effective July 30, 2009, pursuant to
MDIA. In addition, to conform with the
MDIA, certain regulatory changes that
the Board adopted in July 2008 will also
become effective on July 30, 2009 (and
not on October 1, 2009 as originally
provided in the July 2008 final rule).
These regulatory changes are: The
requirement that early disclosures be
given for dwelling-secured mortgage
transactions rather than only for
‘‘residential mortgage transactions’’ to
finance the purchase of initial
construction of the dwelling (in
§§ 226.17(f) and 226.19(a)(1)(i) and
associated commentary) and that early
disclosures be given before consumers
pay any fee except a fee for obtaining
the consumer’s credit history (in
§ 226.19(a)(1)(ii) and (iii) and associated
commentary).
Minor conforming and technical
amendments to Regulation Z are also
being proposed.
II. Section-by-Section Analysis of
Proposed Regulatory Provisions
A. Coverage of § 226.19
TILA Section 128(a) requires creditors
to disclose certain information for
2 The MDIA also increases the dollar amounts of
civil liability for TILA violations.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
closed-end consumer credit
transactions, including, for example, the
amount financed and the APR. TILA
Section 128(b)(2) requires creditors to
make good faith estimates of these
disclosures within three business days
of receiving the consumer’s application,
or before consummation if that occurs
earlier. Until the recent enactment of the
MDIA, TILA Section 128(b)(2) applied
only to a ‘‘residential mortgage
transaction’’ subject to the Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA). See
15 U.S.C. 1602(w). A residential
mortgage transaction is defined in TILA
as a loan to finance the purchase or
initial construction of a consumer’s
dwelling. Regulation Z limits the
definition to transactions secured by the
consumer’s principal dwelling. See
§ 226.2(a)(24).
The MDIA extends the early
disclosure requirement in TILA Section
128(b)(2) to additional types of loans.
Under the MDIA, early disclosures are
required for ‘‘any extension of credit
secured by the dwelling of a consumer.’’
Thus, as amended, the statute requires
early disclosures for home refinance
loans and home equity loans. This is
consistent with revisions made by the
Board’s July 2008 final rule. This
proposal would, however, amend
Regulation Z to also apply the early
disclosure requirements to loans
secured by dwellings other than the
consumer’s principal dwelling.
Accordingly, proposed § 226.19(a)(1)(i)
would require creditors to give
consumers early disclosures in
connection with dwelling-secured credit
(if also subject to RESPA), whether or
not the loan is for the purpose of
financing the purchase or initial
construction of the consumer’s principal
dwelling. As is currently the case,
§ 226.19(a)(1)(i) as proposed to be
revised would not apply to home equity
lines of credit (HELOCs), which are
subject to the rules for open-end credit
in § 226.5b; the July 2008 final rule also
did not apply to HELOCs. As discussed
in detail in part II.G of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, however,
the Board is requesting comment on the
timing of HELOC disclosures, in
connection with the review of content
and format requirements for HELOC
disclosures by Board staff that currently
is under way.
TILA Section 128(b)(2) (as amended
by the MDIA) applies to dwellingsecured mortgage transactions if they
also are subject to RESPA. The U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban
Development’s (HUD) Regulation X
implements RESPA. See 12 U.S.C. 2601
et seq.; 24 CFR 3500.1 et seq. In March
2008, HUD published a proposal to
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 10, 2008 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
amend Regulation X. (See 73 FR 14030;
Mar. 14, 2008). In November 2008, HUD
published final rules amending
Regulation X. (See 73 FR 68204; Nov.
17, 2008). The Board believes that these
proposed amendments to Regulation Z’s
timing requirements for early
disclosures remain consistent with
timing requirements for good faith
estimates of settlement costs under
Regulation X, as amended. Consistency
between Regulation Z and Regulation X
are discussed below in part IV of the
Supplementary Information. The Board
requests comment about ways to further
conform Regulation Z’s disclosure
timing requirements for dwellingsecured credit to the disclosure timing
requirements in HUD’s Regulation X, as
amended.
B. Timing of Delivery of Early
Disclosures—§ 226.19(a)(1)(i)
Currently under Regulation Z,
creditors must provide the early
disclosures within three business days
after receiving the consumer’s written
application or before consummation,
whichever is earlier. The MDIA amends
TILA to require creditors to deliver or
mail the early disclosures no later than
three business days after receiving the
consumer’s application and at least
seven business days before
consummation. The Board is proposing
to further amend § 226.19(a)(1)(i), as
published in the July 2008 final rule, to
reflect this change. Proposed comment
19(a)(1)(i)–6 would be added to clarify
that consummation could occur any
time on the seventh business day
following delivery or mailing; the
proposed comment provides examples
to facilitate compliance.
The MDIA provides that consumers
must receive the early disclosures before
paying any fee in connection with the
mortgage application (other than for
obtaining the consumer’s credit history)
and further provides that if the
disclosures are mailed, the consumer is
considered to have received them three
business days after they are mailed. This
provision of the MDIA merely codifies
§ 226.19(a)(1)(ii) and (iii) of Regulation
Z, as adopted in the Board’s July 2008
final rule. Accordingly, no further
revisions to § 226.19(a)(1)(ii) or (iii) are
being proposed at this time.
Revisions would also be made to
comment 19(a)(1)(i)–3 to conform a
reference to HUD’s Regulation X to the
current language in that regulation.
C. Redisclosure Requirements—
§ 226.19(a)(2)
Currently, when a creditor provides
early TILA disclosures and the APR
subsequently changes beyond the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Dec 09, 2008
Jkt 217001
specified tolerance, the creditor must
redisclose the APR and other changed
terms no later than consummation or
settlement. The MDIA amends TILA
Section 128(b)(2) to require that
creditors make corrected disclosures
that consumers must receive at least
three business days before
consummation in such circumstances.
The MDIA removes the reference to
‘‘settlement’’ for purposes of this
requirement. (For mortgage transactions
secured by a consumer’s interest in a
timeshare plan, however, the MDIA
requires creditors to disclose changed
terms at the time of consummation or
settlement, as discussed below.) The
Board is proposing to amend
§ 226.19(a)(2) to reflect this change.
Under the proposal, consummation can
occur anytime on the third business day
after the consumer receives the
corrected disclosure.
The MDIA also provides that if the
corrected disclosures are mailed, the
consumer is considered to receive the
disclosures three business days after
mailing. This is consistent with the
presumption the Board adopted in the
July 2008 final rule in § 226.19(a)(1)(ii),
which applies when the early
disclosures are mailed; those
disclosures must be received by the
consumer before fees are collected
(other than a credit report fee). The
Board is proposing to revise comment
19(a)(2)–1 to provide examples
illustrating the effect of the threebusiness-day waiting period and when
consummation may occur.
Comment 19(a)(2)–3 would be revised
to clarify that the three-business-day
waiting period before consummation
begins when the disclosures are
received by the consumer and not when
they are mailed. This is consistent with
the rules for certain high-cost loans and
reverse mortgage transactions, which
also require a creditor to make
disclosures at least three business days
before consummation. See § 226.31(c)
and comment 31(c)–1.
D. Definition of ‘‘Business Day’’—
§ 226.2(a)(6)
The MDIA provides that if the early
disclosures are mailed to the consumer,
the consumer is considered to have
received them three business days after
they are mailed. This presumption is
important to two provisions in the
MDIA: (1) The prohibition on collecting
fees before the consumer receives the
early disclosures; and (2) the
requirement, if the APR in the early
disclosures becomes inaccurate, that
creditors make corrected disclosures,
which consumers must receive at least
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
74991
three business days before
consummation.
In the July 2008 final rule, the Board
revised the definition of ‘‘business day’’
to clarify how creditors should count
weekends and federal legal public
holidays in determining when mailed
disclosures are presumed to be received
and how long the restriction on fees
applies under § 226.19(a)(1)(ii). See 73
FR 44599. The Board is proposing to
further revise the definition of ‘‘business
day’’ to clarify that creditors should
count ‘‘business days’’ the same way for
purposes of the presumption in
proposed § 226.19(a)(2) that consumers
receive corrected disclosures three
business days after they are mailed.
Currently, § 226.2(a)(6) contains two
definitions of ‘‘business day.’’ Under the
general definition, a ‘‘business day’’ is a
day on which the creditor’s offices are
open to the public for carrying on
substantially all of its business
functions. However, for some purposes
a more precise definition applies;
‘‘business day’’ means all calendar days
except Sundays and specified federal
legal public holidays, for purposes of
§§ 226.15(e), 226.23(a), and 226.31(c)(1)
and (2). The July 2008 final rule adopted
the more precise definition for use in
determining when mailed disclosures
are presumed to be received under
§ 226.19(a)(1)(ii), and this definition
would also apply for purposes of
proposed § 226.19(a)(2).
Under the MDIA, creditors must
deliver the early disclosures, or place
them in the mail, no later than three
business days after receiving a
consumer’s application for dwellingsecured credit; the delivery or mailing
also must occur at least seven business
days before consummation. Under the
Board’s proposal, the general definition
of business day would be used for
purposes of satisfying these timing
requirements, which are contained in
proposed § 226.19(a)(1)(i). This would
ensure consistency with RESPA’s
requirement that creditors provide good
faith estimates of settlement costs not
later than three business days after the
creditor receives the consumer’s
application for a federally related
mortgage loan. See 24 CFR 3500.2(b)
and 3500.7. In order to simplify the rule,
the general definition of business day
would also be used for determining
when the 7-day waiting period has
expired and consummation may occur.
The Board requests comment, however,
on whether the more precise definition
of business day should be used to
facilitate compliance with the seven
business day waiting period
requirement.
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
74992
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 10, 2008 / Proposed Rules
E. Consumer’s Waiver of Waiting Period
Before Consummation—§ 226.19(a)(3)
Under the MDIA, to expedite
consummation of a mortgage
transaction, a consumer may modify or
waive the timing requirements for the
early disclosures when the consumer
determines that the credit extension is
needed to meet a bona fide personal
financial emergency. However, the
consumer must receive the disclosures
required by § 226.18 at or before the
time of the consumer’s modification or
waiver.
To implement this provision,
proposed § 226.19(a)(3) would permit
the consumer to shorten or waive the
seven-business-day period required by
§ 226.19(a)(1)(i) or the three-businessday waiting period required by
§ 226.19(a)(2). As required by the MDIA,
a consumer may shorten or waive the
pre-consummation waiting period only
if the consumer has received accurate
TILA disclosures reflecting the final
costs and terms. Accordingly, if the
consumer waives the seven-businessday waiting period based on the early
disclosures, and a change occurs that
makes the APR inaccurate (as
determined under § 226.22), the
consumer must receive corrected
disclosures before consummation. In
that circumstance, the three-businessday waiting period in § 226.19(a)(2)
would apply unless the consumer
provides a waiver after receiving the
corrected disclosures. Proposed
comment 19(a)(3)–2 provides examples
that illustrate whether a consumer who
receives corrected disclosures does or
does not need to provide a new
modification or waiver statement.
Under proposed § 226.19(a)(3), the
consumer must give the creditor a dated
written statement describing the
emergency and specifically modifying
or waiving the waiting period(s). All
consumers entitled to receive the
disclosures would have to sign the
statement. Proposed § 226.19(a)(3)
would prohibit the use of printed forms.
The proposed provisions concerning the
modification or waiver of the waiting
periods are substantially similar to the
provisions for waiving the right to
rescind and waiving the three-businessday waiting period before
consummating certain high-cost
mortgage loans. See §§ 226.15(e),
226.23(e), and 226.31(c)(1)(iii). The
Board solicits comment on the proposed
modification or waiver procedures,
especially whether such procedures
should be more or less flexible than
existing procedures for modifying or
waiving the rescission right or the
waiting period before high-cost
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Dec 09, 2008
Jkt 217001
consummating mortgage transactions
covered by § 226.32(a). In particular, the
Board asks commenters to discuss any
specific procedural or other adjustments
the Board should make to implement
the MDIA provisions that permit such
modification or waiver.
Proposed comment 19(a)(3)–1 clarifies
that a consumer may modify or waive
the required waiting period(s) only if
the consumer has a bona fide personal
financial emergency that must be met
before the end of the waiting period(s).
This comment is consistent with
commentary on waiving the rescission
period and the pre-consummation
waiting period required for certain highcost mortgage transactions. See
comments 15(e)–1, 23(e)–1, and
31(c)(1)(iii)–1. The proposed comment
explains that whether a bona fide
personal financial emergency exists
would be determined by the facts
surrounding individual circumstances.
The imminent sale of the consumer’s
home at foreclosure during the threebusiness-day waiting period is provided
as an example. This example is the same
as the example in existing staff
commentary on modifying or waiving
the waiting period required with certain
high-cost mortgage loans. See comment
31(c)(1)(iii)–1.
The Board solicits comment on
whether under proposed § 226.19(a)(3)
modification or waiver should be
permitted only if the consumer’s bona
fide personal financial emergency must
be met before the end of the required
waiting period. The Board also requests
comment on whether there are
circumstances, other than pending
foreclosure, where the consumer may
want to consummate the transaction
before the end of: (1) The sevenbusiness-day waiting period after early
disclosures are made; (2) the threebusiness-day waiting period, if the
creditor is required to make corrected
disclosures; or (3) either period.
F. Notice—§ 226.19(a)(4)
The MDIA requires that the early
disclosures contain a clear and
conspicuous notice containing the
following statement: ‘‘You are not
required to complete this agreement
merely because you have received these
disclosures or signed a loan
application.’’ Under proposed
§ 226.19(a)(4), creditors would have to
include that statement in the early
disclosures, as well as in any corrected
disclosures required by § 226.19(a)(2).
The Board expects that requiring the
notice in corrected disclosures would
impose minimal, if any, burden on
creditors. The Board requests comment
on proposed § 226.19(a)(4), including
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
any benefits to consumers or burdens to
creditors that may result from the
proposed requirement. The Board also
solicits comment on whether the
statement should be provided in
substantially similar form using terms
that are easier for consumers to
understand.
G. Timeshare Plans—§ 226.19(a)(5)
Proposed § 226.19(a)(5) sets forth the
requirements for extensions of credit
secured by a consumer’s interest in a
‘‘timeshare plan’’ (timeshare
transactions), as defined in the
bankruptcy laws (see 11 U.S.C.
§ 101(53D)). Pursuant to amendments
made to the MDIA in the Stabilization
Act, the disclosure requirements and the
fee restriction added by the MDIA are
not applicable to these transactions,
which instead are subject to the same
early disclosure requirements that
applied to ‘‘residential mortgage
transactions’’ under TILA Section
128(b)(2) before the MDIA was enacted.
Accordingly, for timeshare transactions
creditors must make good faith
estimates of the disclosures required by
§ 226.18 before credit is extended, or
must deliver or place the early
disclosures in the mail within three
business days (days the creditor’s offices
are open to the public for substantially
all business functions) after the creditor
receives the consumer’s application,
whichever is earlier. The sevenbusiness-day waiting period and threebusiness-day waiting period before
consummation, contained in proposed
§§ 226.19(a)(1)(i) and 226.19(a)(2)
respectively, do not apply to timeshare
transactions.
If the APR stated in the early
disclosures changes beyond the
specified tolerance, proposed
§ 226.19(a)(5)(iii) requires creditors to
disclose all the changed terms no later
than consummation or settlement of the
transaction. This is consistent with the
existing rules for residential mortgage
transactions in § 226.19(a)(2). The
discussion in proposed comment
19(a)(5)(iii)–1 of disclosing changed
terms no later than ‘‘consummation’’ or
‘‘settlement’’ for timeshare transactions
is based on current comments 19(a)(2)–
3 and 19(a)(2)–4. Currently, comment
19(a)(2)–3 states that ‘‘consummation’’
is defined in § 226.2(a), whereas ‘‘date
of settlement’’ is defined in HUD’s
Regulation X (24 CFR 3500.2(a)).
Comment 19(a)(2)–4 currently explains
that when a creditor delays redisclosure
until settlement, which may be at a time
later than consummation, disclosures
may be based on the terms in effect at
settlement, rather than the terms in
effect at settlement. As discussed above,
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 10, 2008 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
for transactions other than timeshare
transactions, the MDIA amends TILA to
remove reference to ‘‘settlement’’ from
TILA’s provisions requiring creditors to
make corrected disclosures. Under the
MDIA, consumers must receive any
corrected disclosures at least three
business days before consummation.
The Board solicits comment on the
costs and benefits of basing the timing
requirements for corrected disclosures
solely on the time of consummation, for
purposes of non-timeshare transactions,
but on the time of consummation or
settlement, for purposes of timeshare
transactions. If Regulation Z’s timing
requirements for corrected disclosures
should be consistent for timeshare
transactions and non-timeshare
transactions, should Regulation Z
require creditors to make corrected
disclosures at the time of consummation
(rather than the time of consummation
or settlement), for purposes of timeshare
transactions? Or should Regulation Z
require creditors to make corrected
disclosures three business days before
the later of consummation or settlement,
for purposes of covered transactions
other than timeshare transactions?
H. Solicitation of Comments on Timing
of Disclosures for Home Equity Lines of
Credit
The MDIA applies only to closed-end
loans secured by a consumer’s dwelling
and does not affect the disclosure
requirements for open-end credit plans
secured by a dwelling (home equity
lines of credit, or HELOCs). In
connection with the Board’s
comprehensive review of mortgage
transactions, the Board’s staff is
currently reviewing the content and
format of HELOC disclosures and
subjecting them to consumer testing. A
proposal to improve the disclosures is
anticipated next year. To aid in this
review, the Board seeks comment on
whether it is necessary or appropriate to
change the timing of HELOC disclosures
and, if so, what changes should be
made.
Under current rules, consumers
typically receive non-transaction
specific disclosures describing the
creditor’s HELOC plan at the time they
receive an application. See 12 CFR
226.5b. Creditors must provide more
detailed disclosures at account opening,
before the first transaction. See 12 CFR
226.6. The Board seeks comment on
whether transaction-specific disclosures
(such as the APR, an itemization of fees,
and potential payment amounts) should
be required after application but
significantly earlier than account
opening, at least in some circumstances.
For example, many consumers take a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Dec 09, 2008
Jkt 217001
major draw on the account as soon as
they open it. These consumers may use
the funds to finance a home purchase
(usually, but not necessarily, with a
simultaneous closed-end loan) or an
immediate expense (such as a college
tuition bill). Would a requirement to
disclose final HELOC terms, including
the APR and fees, three days before
account opening substantially benefit
consumers who plan to draw
immediately? Comment is also solicited
on the potential costs and whether they
would outweigh potential benefits.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3506; 5 CFR Part 1320 Appendix A.1),
the Board reviewed the proposed rule
under the authority delegated to the
Board by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). The collection of
information that is required by this
proposed rule is found in 12 CFR part
226. The Federal Reserve may not
conduct or sponsor, and an organization
is not required to respond to, this
information collection unless the
information collection displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The OMB control number is 7100–0199.
This information collection is
required to provide benefits for
consumers and is mandatory (15 U.S.C.
1601 et seq.). Since the Federal Reserve
does not collect any information, no
issue of confidentiality arises. The
respondents/recordkeepers are creditors
and other entities subject to Regulation
Z, including for-profit financial
institutions and small businesses.
TILA and Regulation Z are intended
to ensure effective disclosure of the
costs and terms of credit to consumers.
For open-end credit, creditors are
required to, among other things,
disclose information about the initial
costs and terms and to provide periodic
statements of account activity, notice of
changes in terms, and statements of
rights concerning billing error
procedures. Regulation Z requires
specific types of disclosures for credit
and charge card accounts and home
equity plans. For closed-end loans, such
as mortgage and installment loans, cost
disclosures are required to be provided
prior to consummation. Special
disclosures are required in connection
with certain products, such as reverse
mortgages, certain variable-rate loans,
and certain mortgages with rates and
fees above specified thresholds. TILA
and Regulation Z also contain rules
concerning credit advertising. Creditors
are required to retain evidence of
compliance for twenty-four months
(§ 226.25), but Regulation Z does not
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
74993
specify the types of records that must be
retained.
Under the PRA, the Federal Reserve
accounts for the paperwork burden
associated with Regulation Z for the
state member banks and other creditors
supervised by the Federal Reserve that
engage in lending covered by Regulation
Z and, therefore, are respondents under
the PRA. Appendix I of Regulation Z
defines the Federal Reserve-regulated
institutions as: State member banks,
branches and agencies of foreign banks
(other than federal branches, federal
agencies, and insured state branches of
foreign banks), commercial lending
companies owned or controlled by
foreign banks, and organizations
operating under section 25 or 25A of the
Federal Reserve Act. Other federal
agencies account for the paperwork
burden imposed on the entities for
which they have administrative
enforcement authority. The current total
annual burden to comply with the
provisions of Regulation Z is estimated
to be 578,847 hours for the 1,138
Federal Reserve-regulated institutions
that are deemed to be respondents for
the purposes of the PRA. To ease the
burden and cost of complying with
Regulation Z (particularly for small
entities), the Federal Reserve provides
model forms, which are appended to the
regulation.
The proposed rule would impose a
one-time increase in the total annual
burden under Regulation Z for all
respondents regulated by the Federal
Reserve by 9,104 hours, from 578,847 to
587,951 hours.
The total estimated burden increase,
as well as the estimates of the burden
increase associated with each major
section of the proposed rule as set forth
below, represents averages for all
respondents regulated by the Federal
Reserve. The Federal Reserve expects
that the amount of time required to
implement each of the proposed
changes for a given institution may vary
based on the size and complexity of the
respondent. Furthermore, the burden
estimate for this rulemaking does not
include the burden addressing changes
to format, timing, and content
requirements for the credit disclosures
governed by Regulation Z as announced
in a separate proposed rulemaking
(Docket No. R–1286).
The Federal Reserve estimates that
1,138 respondents regulated by the
Federal Reserve would take, on average,
8 hours (one business day) to update
their systems to comply with the
proposed disclosure requirements in
§§ 226.17 and 226.19. This one-time
revision would increase the burden by
9,104 hours.
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
74994
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 10, 2008 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
The other federal agencies are
responsible for estimating and reporting
to OMB the total paperwork burden for
the institutions for which they have
administrative enforcement authority.
They may, but are not required to, use
the Federal Reserve’s burden estimation
methodology. Using the Federal
Reserve’s method, the total current
estimated annual burden for all
financial institutions subject to
Regulation Z, including Federal
Reserve-supervised institutions, would
be approximately 11,671,017 hours. The
proposed rule would increase the
estimated annual burden for all
institutions subject to Regulation Z by
137,600 hours to 11,808,617 hours. The
above estimates represent an average
across all respondents and reflect
variations between institutions based on
their size, complexity, and practices. All
covered institutions, of which there are
approximately 17,200, are potentially
affected by this collection of
information, and thus are respondents
for purposes of the PRA.
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the Federal Reserve’s functions;
including whether the information has
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the
Federal Reserve’s estimate of the burden
of the proposed information collection,
including the cost of compliance; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of information collection on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments on the collection of
information should be sent to Michelle
Shore, Federal Reserve Board Clearance
Officer, Division of Research and
Statistics, Mail Stop 151–A, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, Washington, DC 20551, with
copies of such comments sent to the
Office of Management and Budget,
Paperwork Reduction Project (7100–
0199), Washington, DC 20503.
IV. Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. 601–612, generally requires an
agency to perform an assessment of the
impact a rule is expected to have on
small entities.3 However, under Section
3 Under standards the U.S. Small Business
Administration sets (SBA), an entity is considered
‘‘small’’ if it has $175 million or less in assets for
banks and other depository institutions; and $6.5
million or less in revenues for non-bank mortgage
lenders, mortgage brokers, and loan servicers. U.S.
Small Business Administration, Table of Small
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Dec 09, 2008
Jkt 217001
605(b) of the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the
regulatory flexibility analysis otherwise
required under section 604 of the RFA
is not required if an agency certifies,
along with a statement providing the
factual basis for such certification, that
the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The Board
believes that this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The proposed amendments to
Regulation Z are narrowly designed to
implement the revisions to the Truth in
Lending Act (TILA) made by the MDIA.
Creditors must comply with the MDIA’s
requirements when they become
effective on July 30, 2009, whether or
not the Board amends Regulation Z as
proposed. The Board’s proposal is
intended to facilitate compliance by
eliminating inconsistencies between
Regulation Z’s existing requirements
and the statutory requirements imposed
by the MDIA starting July 30, 2009. A
final regulatory flexibility analysis will
be conducted after consideration of
comments received during the public
comment period. The Board requests
public comment in the areas discussed
below.
A. Reasons for the Proposed Rule
Congress enacted the TILA based on
findings that economic stability would
be enhanced and competition among
consumer credit providers would be
strengthened by the informed use of
credit resulting from consumers’
awareness of the cost of credit. One of
the stated purposes of TILA is to
provide a meaningful disclosure of
credit terms to enable consumers to
compare credit terms available in the
marketplace more readily and avoid the
uninformed use of credit. TILA also
contains procedural and substantive
protections for consumers. TILA directs
the Board to prescribe regulations to
carry out the purposes of the statute.
The Board’s Regulation Z implements
TILA.
Congress enacted the Mortgage
Disclosure Improvement Act of 2008
(MDIA) in 2008 as an amendment to
TILA. The MDIA amends TILA’s special
disclosure requirements for closed-end
mortgage transactions that are secured
by a consumer’s dwelling and subject to
the Real Estate Settlement Procedures
Act (RESPA). In July 2008, the Board
revised Regulation Z to expand the
number of transactions in which
Business Size Standards Matched to North
American Industry Classification System Codes,
available at https://www.sba.gov/idc/groups/public/
documents/sba_homepage/serv_sstd_tablepdf.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
creditors must give a good faith estimate
of the required disclosures (‘‘early
disclosures’’). Previously, early
disclosures were required only for loans
made to finance the purchase or initial
construction of a consumer’s principal
dwelling. Under the July 2008 final rule,
creditors must provide early disclosures
for any transaction secured by the
consumer’s principal dwelling, such as
a home refinance loan or home equity
loan. The MDIA amends TILA to require
early disclosures for consumer loans
secured by any dwelling, even if it is not
the consumer’s principal dwelling. As
explained in parts I and II of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, the
proposal would require creditors to
delay consummating a loan for seven
business days after the creditor makes
early disclosures, and three business
days after the consumer receives any
required corrected disclosures.
B. Statement of Objectives and Legal
Basis
Parts I and II of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION contain a detailed
discussion of the objectives and legal
basis for this proposed rulemaking. In
summary, the proposed amendments to
Regulation Z are designed to implement
changes that the MDIA makes to TILA.
The legal basis for the proposed rule is
in Section 105(a) of TILA.
C. Description of Small Entities to
Which the Proposed Rule Would Apply
The proposed regulations would
apply to all institutions and entities that
engage in closed-end dwelling-secured
lending for consumer purposes that is
subject to RESPA. TILA and Regulation
Z have broad applicability to
individuals and businesses that
originate even small numbers of homesecured loans. See § 226.1(c)(1). The
Board is not aware of a reliable source
for the total number or asset sizes of
small entities likely to be affected by the
proposal. However, through data from
Reports of Condition and Income (‘‘Call
Reports’’) of depository institutions and
certain subsidiaries of banks and bank
companies, as well as data reported
under the Home Mortgage Disclosure
Act (HMDA),4 the Board can estimate
4 HMDA requires lenders to report information
annually to their federal supervisory agencies for
each application and loan acted on during the
calendar year. See 12 U.S.C. 2801 et seq. The loans
reported are estimated to represent about 80 percent
of all home lending nationwide and therefore are
likely to be broadly representative of home lending
in the United States. Robert B. Avery, and Kenneth
P. Brevoort, and Glenn B. Canner, The 2007 HMDA
Data, 84 Federal Reserve Bulletin (forthcoming
2008) (2007 HMDA Data) at 2, https://www.federal
reserve.gov/pubs/bulletin/2008/pdf/
hmda07draft.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 10, 2008 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
the approximate number of small
depository institutions that would be
subject to the proposed rules. For the
majority of HMDA respondents that are
not depository institutions, exact asset
size information is not available,
although the Board has somewhat
reliable estimates based on selfreporting from approximately five
percent of the non-depository
respondents.
Based on the best information
available, the Board makes the following
estimate of small entities that would be
affected by this proposed rule:
According to June 2008 Call Report
data, approximately 9,670 small
depository institutions would be subject
to the proposed rule. Approximately
16,966 depository institutions in the
United States filed Call Report data,
approximately 12,392 of which had total
domestic assets of $175 million or less
and thus were considered small entities
for purposes of the RFA. Of 4,387 banks,
588 thrifts and 7,278 credit unions that
filed Call Report data and were
considered small entities, 4,236 banks,
553 thrifts, and 4,881 credit unions,
totaling 9,670 institutions, extended
mortgage credit. For purposes of this
Call Report analysis, thrifts include
savings banks, savings and loan entities,
co-operative banks and industrial banks.
Further, HMDA data reported in 2008
(for 2007 lending activities) indicate
that 1,752 non-depository institutions
(independent mortgage companies,
subsidiaries of a depository institution,
or affiliates of a bank holding company)
filed HMDA reports in 2008 for 2007
lending activities.5 Based on the small
volume of lending activity reported by
these institutions, most are likely to be
small entities. In connection with its
proposed amendments to Regulation Z
to implement the MDIA, the Board
invites comment and information on the
number and type of small entities that
originate loans secured by a consumer’s
dwelling and subject to RESPA.
D. Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping,
and Other Compliance Requirements
The compliance requirements of the
proposed rules are described in parts I
and II of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. The effect of the proposed
revisions to Regulation Z on small
entities is unknown. To comply with
the revised rules, many small entities
would be required to modify their
procedures for making credit
disclosures for dwelling-secured
mortgage transactions. The precise costs
to small entities of updating their
systems and disclosures are difficult to
5 2007
HMDA Data at 5–6 and tbl. 2.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Dec 09, 2008
Jkt 217001
predict. These costs will depend on a
number of unknown factors, including,
among other things, the specifications of
the current systems used by such
entities to prepare and provide
disclosures. The Board believes that
these costs will not have a significant
economic effect on small entities. The
Board seeks information and comment
on any costs, compliance requirements,
or changes in operating procedures
arising from the application of the
proposed rule to small institutions.
E. Identification of Duplicative,
Overlapping, or Conflicting Federal
Rules
The Board has not identified any
federal rules that conflict with the
proposed revisions to Regulation Z. As
discussed in part II of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, TILA and
the Board’s proposed revisions to
Regulation Z overlap with RESPA and
HUD’s Regulation X, which implements
RESPA. TILA’s purpose is to inform
consumers about loan terms, and
RESPA’s is to inform consumers about
settlement costs. These laws overlap
with one another because settlement
costs may include loan origination fees,
and consumers may finance their
settlement costs. Moreover, the Board’s
proposed revisions overlap with
Regulation X, as revised by HUD in
November 2008, in at least three ways.
First, the proposed revisions apply to an
extension of credit that is both secured
by a consumer’s dwelling and subject to
RESPA. Second, the proposed revisions
continue to cross-reference the
definition of ‘‘application’’ under
Regulation X. Third, the time period
following application, within which
creditors would have to make early
disclosures under the Board’s proposed
rule, is the same as the time period
within which creditors must make good
faith estimates of settlement costs under
RESPA—within three business days
following application. Moreover, the
proposed early disclosure requirements
use a definition of ‘‘business day’’ that
is consistent with the ‘‘business day’’
definition under Regulation X.
The MDIA amends TILA to base
timing requirements for corrected
disclosures on the date of
‘‘consummation’’—rather than on the
later of ‘‘consummation’’ and
‘‘settlement’’—for purposes of timing
rules for most, but not all, mortgage
transactions secured by a consumer’s
dwelling. Therefore, for most dwellingsecured mortgage transactions, the
Board’s proposed revisions to
Regulation Z would remove references
to ‘‘settlement,’’ a term defined in
Regulation X. These revisions to
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
74995
Regulation Z and associated
commentary thus would reduce overlap
with Regulation X. However, the
MDIA’s timing requirements for
corrected disclosures for transactions
secured by a consumer’s interest in a
timeshare plan refer both to
‘‘consummation’’ and ‘‘settlement.’’ The
Board is requesting comment the costs
and benefits of basing the timing
requirements for corrected disclosures
solely on the time of consummation, for
purposes of non-timeshare transactions,
but on the time of consummation or
settlement, for purposes of timeshare
transactions.
F. Identification of Duplicative,
Overlapping, or Conflicting State Laws
Certain sections of the proposed rules
may result in inconsistency with certain
state laws. The closed-end credit
disclosure requirements in TILA that
the proposed rules would implement do
not annul, alter, or affect the laws of any
State relating to the disclosure of
information in connection with credit
transactions, except to the extent those
laws are inconsistent with TILA, and
then only to the extent of the
inconsistency. See 15 U.S.C. 1610(a); 12
CFR 226.28(a)(1). Interested parties may
request that the Board determine
whether any such inconsistency exists,
in accordance with procedures
prescribed in the Board’s regulations.
The Board seeks comment regarding any
state or local statutes or regulations that
would duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with the proposed rule.
G. Discussion of Significant Alternatives
The Board does not believe that
reasonable alternatives to the proposed
rule as a whole exist for implementing
the MDIA’s disclosure requirements for
closed-end mortgage transactions
secured by a consumer’s dwelling and
subject to RESPA. The Board is
proposing regulations for the narrow
purpose of carrying out its statutory
mandate to implement the Truth in
Lending Act, as amended by the MDIA.
The Board nevertheless welcomes
comments on any significant
alternatives, consistent with the MDIA’s
requirements, that would minimize the
impact of the proposed rule on small
entities.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 226
Advertising, Consumer protection,
Federal Reserve System, Mortgages,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Truth in lending.
Text of Proposed Revisions
Certain conventions have been used
to highlight the proposed revisions.
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
74996
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 10, 2008 / Proposed Rules
New language, compared to the
Regulation Z amendments the Board
adopted in the July 2008 final rule (73
FR 44522; July 30, 2008), is shown
inside bold arrows, and language that
would be deleted is set off with bold
brackets.
§ 226.19(a)(2) and
§ 226.19(a)(5)(iii)):fi 39
*
*
*
*
*
4. Section 226.19 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (a)(2),
and adding new paragraphs (a)(3), (a)(4),
and (a)(5), to read as follows:
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Board proposes to amend
Regulation Z, 12 CFR part 226, as set
forth below:
§ 226.19 Certain mortgage and variablerate transactions.
(a) Mortgage transactions subject to
RESPA—(1)(i) Time of disclosures. In a
mortgage transaction subject to the Real
Estate Settlement Procedures Act (12
U.S.C. 2601 et seq.) that is secured by
the consumer’s øprincipal¿ dwelling,
other than a home equity line of credit
subject to § 226.5b flor mortgage
transaction subject to paragraph (a)(5) of
this sectionfi, the creditor shall make
good faith estimates of the disclosures
required by § 226.18 øbefore
consummation, or shall deliver¿fl. The
creditor shall deliver¿ these good faith
estimatesfi or place them in the mail
not later than three business days after
the creditor receives the consumer’s
written application, øwhichever is
earlier.¿fland at least seven business
days before consummation of the
transaction.fi
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Redisclosure required. øIf the
annual percentage rate at the time of
consummation varies from the annual
percentage rate disclosed earlier by
more than 1⁄8 of 1 percentage point in a
regular transaction or more than 1⁄4 of 1
percentage point in an irregular
transaction, as defined in § 226.22, the
creditor shall disclose all the changed
terms no later than consummation or
settlement.¿flIf the annual percentage
rate disclosed in the good faith
estimates required by paragraph (a)(1) of
this section becomes inaccurate under
§ 226.22, the creditor shall make
corrected disclosures to the consumer
under § 226.18 with an accurate annual
percentage rate, as determined under
§ 226.22, and all changed terms. The
consumer must receive the corrected
disclosures no later than three business
days before consummation. If the
disclosures required under this
paragraph are mailed to the consumer,
the consumer is deemed to have
received the disclosures three business
days after they are mailed.
(3) Consumer’s waiver of waiting
period before consummation. If the
consumer determines that the extension
of credit is needed to meet a bona fide
personal financial emergency, the
consumer may modify or waive the
seven-business-day waiting period
required by paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this
PART 226—TRUTH IN LENDING
(REGULATION Z)
1. The authority citation for part 226
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 3806; 15 U.S.C. 1604,
1637(c)(5), and 1639(l).
Subpart A—General
2. Section 226.2 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(6) to read as
follows:
§ 226.2 Definitions and rules of
construction.
(a) * * *
(6) Business Day means a day on
which the creditor’s offices are open to
the public for carrying on substantially
all of its business functions. However,
for purposes of rescission under
§§ 226.15 and 226.23, and for purposes
of § 226.19(a)(1)(ii) fl, § 226.19(a)(2),fi
and § 226.31, the term means all
calendar days except Sundays and the
legal public holidays specified in 5
U.S.C. 6103(a), such as New Year’s Day,
the Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr.,
Washington’s Birthday, Memorial Day,
Independence Day, Labor Day,
Columbus Day, Veterans Day,
Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart C—Closed-End Credit
3. Section 226.17 is amended by
revising paragraph (f) to read as follows:
§ 226.17
General disclosure requirements.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Early disclosures. If disclosures
required by this subpart are given before
the date of consummation of a
transaction and a subsequent event
makes them inaccurate, the creditor
shall disclose before consummation
ø(except that, for certain mortgage
transactions, § 226.19 permits
redisclosure no later than
consummation or settlement, whichever
is later).¿fl(subject to the provisions of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:32 Dec 09, 2008
Jkt 217001
Frm 00008
Supplement I to Part 226—Official Staff
Interpretations
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart A—General
*
*
*
*
*
Section 226.2—Definitions and Rules of
Construction
2(a) Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
2(a)(6) Business day.
*
*
*
*
*
2. øRescission rule¿flRule for rescission
and disclosures for certain mortgage
39 [Reserved.]
PO 00000
section or the three-business-day
waiting period required by paragraph
(a)(2) of this section, after receiving the
disclosures required by § 226.18. To
modify or waive a waiting period, the
consumer shall give the creditor a dated
written statement that describes the
emergency, specifically modifies or
waives the waiting period, and bears the
signature of all the consumers entitled
to receive the disclosures. Printed forms
for this purpose are prohibited.
(4) Notice. Disclosures made pursuant
to paragraph (a)(1) or paragraph (a)(2) of
this section shall contain the following
statement: ‘‘You are not required to
complete this agreement merely because
you have received these disclosures or
signed a loan application.’’
(5) Timeshare plans. In a mortgage
transaction subject to the Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act (12 U.S.C.
2601 et seq.) that is secured by a
consumer’s interest in a timeshare plan
described in 11 U.S.C. 101(53D)):
(i) The requirements of paragraph
(a)(1) through (a)(4) of this section do
not apply;
(ii) The creditor shall make good faith
estimates of the disclosures required by
§ 226.18 before consummation, or shall
deliver or place them in the mail not
later than three business days after the
creditor receives the consumer’s written
application, whichever is earlier; and
(iii) If the annual percentage rate at
the time of consummation varies from
the annual percentage rate disclosed
under paragraph (a)(5)(ii) of this section
by more than 1⁄8 of 1 percentage point
in a regular transaction or more than 1⁄4
of 1 percentage point in an irregular
transaction, as defined in § 226.22, the
creditor shall disclose all the changed
terms no later than consummation or
settlement.fi
*
*
*
*
*
5. In Supplement I to Part 226, under
Section 226.2—Definitions and Rules of
Construction, 2(a) Definitions, 2(a)(6)
Business day, paragraph 2(a)(6)–2 is
revised to read as follows:
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 10, 2008 / Proposed Rules
transactionsfi. A more precise rule for what
is a business day (all calendar days except
Sundays and the federal legal holidays
specified in 5 U.S.C. 6103(a)) applies when
the right of rescission or the receipt of
disclosures for certain fldwelling-securedfi
mortgage transactions under
§§ 226.19(a)(1)(ii), fl226.19(a)(2),fi or
ømortgages subject to § 226.32 are¿ 226.31(c)
flisfi involved. ø(See also comment
31(c)(1)–1.)¿ Four federal legal holidays are
identified in 5 U.S.C. 6103(a) by a specific
date: New Year’s Day, January 1;
Independence Day, July 4; Veterans Day,
November 11; and Christmas Day, December
25. When one of these holidays (July 4, for
example) falls on a Saturday, federal offices
and other entities might observe the holiday
on the preceding Friday (July 3). øThe¿flIn
cases where the more precise rule applies,
thefi observed holiday (in the example, July
3) is a business day øfor purposes of
rescission or the delivery of disclosures for
certain high-cost mortgages covered by
§ 226.32¿.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart C—Closed-End Credit
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
6. In Supplement I to Part 226, under
Section 226.19—Certain Mortgage and
Variable-Rate Transactions, 19(a)(1)(i)
Time of disclosure, paragraphs
19(a)(1)(i)–1 through 19(a)(1)(i)–5 are
revised and new paragraph 19(a)(1)(i)–6
is added, heading Paragraph 19(a)(2)
Redisclosure required and paragraphs
19(a)(2)–1 through 19(a)(2)–3 are revised
and paragraph 19(a)(2)–4 is removed,
new heading 19(a)(3) Consumer’s
waiver of waiting period before
consummation and new paragraphs
19(a)(3)–1 and 19(a)(3)–2 are added,
new heading 19(a)(5)(ii) Time of
disclosures for timeshare plans and new
paragraph 19(a)(5)(ii)–1 are added, and
new heading 19(a)(5)(iii) Redisclosure
for timeshare plans and new paragraph
19(a)(5)(iii)–1 are added, to read as
follows:
Section 226.19—Certain Mortgage and
Variable-Rate Transactions
19(a)(1)(i) Time of disclosure.
1. Coverage. This section requires early
disclosure of credit terms in mortgage
transactions that are secured by a consumer’s
øprincipal¿ dwelling fl(other than home
equity lines of credit subject to § 226.5b or
mortgage transactions secured by an interest
in a timeshare plan)fi and also subject to the
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
(RESPA) and its implementing Regulation X,
administered by the Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD). To be
covered by § 226.19, a transaction must be a
federally related mortgage loan under
RESPA. ‘‘Federally related mortgage loan’’ is
defined under RESPA (12 U.S.C. 2602) and
Regulation X (24 CFR 3500.2), and is subject
to any interpretations by HUD. øRESPA
coverage includes such transactions as loans
to purchase dwellings, refinancings of loans
secured by dwellings, and subordinate-lien
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Dec 09, 2008
Jkt 217001
home-equity loans, among others. Although
RESPA coverage relates to any dwelling,
§ 226.19(a) applies to such transactions if
they are secured by a consumer’s principal
dwelling. Also, home equity lines of credit
subject to § 226.5b are not covered by
§ 226.19(a). For guidance on the applicability
of the Board’s revisions to § 226.19(a)
published on July 30, 2008, see comment
1(d)(5)–1.¿
2. Timing and use of estimates. øTruth in
Lending disclosures must be given¿flThe
disclosures required by § 226.19(a)(1)(i) must
be delivered or mailedfi ø(a) before
consummation or (b) within¿flnot later
thanfi three business days after the creditor
receives the consumer’s written applicationø,
whichever is earlier.¿ fland at least seven
business days before consummation. The
general definition of ‘‘business day’’ in
§ 226.2(a)(6)—a day on which the creditor’s
offices are open to the public for
substantially all of its business functions—is
used for purposes of § 226.19(a)(1)(i). See
comment 2(a)(6)–1. This general definition is
consistent with the definition of ‘‘business
day’’ in HUD’s Regulation X—a day on which
the creditor’s offices are open to the public
for carrying on substantially all of its
business functions. See 24 CFR 6500.2.
Accordingly, thefiøThe¿ threefl-businessfiday period in § 226.19(a)(1)(i) for making
early disclosures coincides with the time
period within which creditors subject to
RESPA must provide good faith estimates of
settlement costs. If the creditor does not
know the precise credit terms, the creditor
must base the disclosures on the best
information reasonably available and
indicate that the disclosures are estimates
under § 226.17(c)(2). If many of the
disclosures are estimates, the creditor may
include a statement to that effect (such as ‘‘all
numerical disclosures except the latepayment disclosure are estimates’’) instead of
separately labelling each estimate. In the
alternative, the creditor may label as an
estimate only the items primarily affected by
unknown information. (See the commentary
to § 226.17(c)(2).) The creditor may provide
explanatory material concerning the
estimates and the contingencies that may
affect the actual terms, in accordance with
the commentary to § 226.17(a)(1).)
3. Written application. Creditors may rely
on RESPA and Regulation X (including any
interpretations issued by HUD) in deciding
whether a ‘‘written application’’ has been
received. In general, Regulation X ørequires
disclosures ‘‘to every person from whom the
Lender receives or for whom it prepares a
written application on an application form or
forms normally used by the Lender for a
Federally Related Mortgage Loan’’ (See 24
CFR 3500.6(a)).¿fldefines ‘‘application’’ to
mean the submission of a borrower’s
financial information in anticipation of a
credit decision relating to a federally related
mortgage loan. See 24 CFR 3500.2(b).fi An
application is received when it reaches the
creditor in any of the ways applications are
normally transmitted—by mail, hand
delivery, or through an intermediary agent or
broker. (See comment 19(b)–3 for guidance in
determining whether or not the transaction
involves an intermediary agent or broker.) If
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
74997
an application reaches the creditor through
an intermediary agent or broker, the
application is received when it reaches the
creditor, rather than when it reaches the
agent or broker.
4. Exceptions. The creditor may determine
within the three-flbusiness-fiday period
that the application will not or cannot be
approved on the terms requested, as, for
example, when a consumer applies for a type
or amount of credit that the creditor does not
offer, or the consumer’s application cannot
be approved for some other reason. In that
case, the creditor need not make the
disclosures under this section. If the creditor
fails to provide early disclosures and the
transaction is later consummated on the
original terms, the creditor will be in
violation of this provision. If, however, the
consumer amends the application because of
the creditor’s unwillingness to approve it on
its original terms, no violation occurs for not
providing disclosures based on the original
terms. But the amended application is a new
application subject to § 226.19(a)(1)(i).
5. Itemization of amount financed. In many
mortgage transactions, the itemization of the
amount financed required by § 226.18(c) will
contain items, such as origination fees or
points, that also must be disclosed as part of
the good faith estimates of settlement costs
required under RESPA. Creditors furnishing
the RESPA good faith estimates need not give
consumers any itemization of the amount
financed, either with the disclosures
provided within three flbusinessfi days
after application or with the disclosures
flrequired by § 226.19(a)(2) andfi given
øat¿flthree business days beforefi
consummation øor settlement¿.
fl6. Consummation. The following
examples illustrate when consummation may
occur under § 226.19(a)(1)(i) in different
circumstances:
i. A creditor that is open for business only
Monday through Friday delivers the early
disclosures to the consumer in person or
places them in the mail on Monday, June 1.
Consummation may occur on or after
Wednesday, June 10, the seventh business
day following delivery or mailing of the early
disclosures.
ii. A creditor that is open for business
seven days per week delivers the early
disclosures to the consumer in person or
places them in the mail on Monday, June 1.
Consummation may occur on or after
Monday, June 8, the seventh business day
following delivery or mailing of the early
disclosures.fi
*
*
*
*
*
øParagraph¿ 19(a)(2) Redisclosure
required.
1. Conditions for redisclosure. øCreditors
must make new disclosures if the annual
percentage rate at consummation differs from
the estimate originally disclosed by more
than 1⁄8 of 1 percentage point in regular
transactions or 1⁄4 of 1 percentage point in
irregular transactions, as defined in footnote
46 of § 226.22(a)(3). The creditor must also
redisclose if a variable rate feature is added
to the credit terms after the original
disclosures have been made. The creditor has
the option of redisclosing information under
other circumstances, if it wishes to do
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
74998
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 10, 2008 / Proposed Rules
so.¿flIf, at the time of consummation, the
APR disclosed as required by § 226.19(a)(1)(i)
is accurate under § 226.22, the creditor has
complied with § 226.19(a)(2). If, on the other
hand, the APR disclosed as required by
§ 226.19(a)(1)(i) is not accurate under
§ 226.22, the creditor must make corrected
disclosures of all changed terms (including
the APR) so that the consumer receives them
at least three business days before
consummation. For example, assume
consummation is scheduled for Thursday,
June 11 and the early disclosures for a regular
mortgage transaction disclose an APR of
7.00%:
i. On Thursday, June 11, the APR will be
7.10%. The creditor is not required to make
corrected disclosures under § 226.19(a)(2).
ii. On Thursday, June 11, the APR will be
7.15%. The creditor must make corrected
disclosures to the consumer on or before
Monday, June 8.fi
2. Content of new disclosures. If
redisclosure is required, the creditor may
provide a complete set of new disclosures, or
may redisclose only the flchangedfi terms
øthat vary from those originally disclosed¿.
If the creditor chooses to provide a complete
set of new disclosures, the creditor may but
need not highlight the new terms, provided
that the disclosures comply with the format
requirements of § 226.17(a). If the creditor
chooses to disclose only the new terms, all
the new terms must be disclosed. For
example, a different annual percentage rate
will almost always produce a different
finance charge, and often a new schedule of
payments; all of these changes would have to
be disclosed. If, in addition, unrelated terms
such as the amount financed or prepayment
penalty vary from those originally disclosed,
the accurate terms must be disclosed.
However, no new disclosures are required if
the only inaccuracies involve estimates other
than the annual percentage rate, and no
variable rate feature has been added.
3. Timing. Redisclosures, when necessary
flbecause the annual percentage rate has
become inaccuratefi, must be
øgiven¿flreceived by the consumerfi no
later than ø‘‘consummation or settlement.’’
‘‘Consummation’’ is defined in § 226.2(a).
‘‘Date of settlement’’ is defined in Regulation
X (24 CFR 3500.2(a)) and is subject to any
interpretations issued under RESPA and
Regulation X.¿flthree business days before
consummation. (For redisclosures triggered
by other events, the creditor must provide
corrected disclosures before consummation.
See § 226.17(f).) For purposes of
§ 226.19(a)(2), ‘‘business day’’ means all
calendar days except Sundays and the legal
public holidays referred to in § 226.2(a)(6).
See comment 2(a)(6)–2. If the creditor
delivers the corrected disclosures to the
consumer in person, consummation may
occur any time on the third business day
following delivery. If the creditor places the
disclosures in the mail, the consumer is
considered to have received them three
business days after they are mailed. For
example, if the creditor places the
disclosures in the mail on Thursday, June 4,
the disclosures are considered received on
Monday, June 8 and consummation may
occur any time on or after Thursday, June
11.fi
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:39 Dec 09, 2008
Jkt 217001
ø4. Basis of disclosures. In some cases, a
creditor may delay redisclosure until
settlement, which may be at a time later than
consummation. If a creditor chooses to
redisclose at settlement, disclosures may be
based on the terms in effect at settlement,
rather than at consummation. For example,
in a variable-rate transaction, a creditor may
choose to base disclosures on the terms in
effect at settlement despite the general rule
in the commentary to § 18(f) that variable-rate
disclosures should be based on the terms in
effect at consummation.¿
fl19(a)(3) Consumer’s waiver of waiting
period before consummation.
1. Modification or waiver. A consumer may
modify or waive the right to the waiting
period required by § 226.19(a)(1)(i) or
§ 226.19(a)(2) only after the creditor makes
the disclosures required by § 226.18. The
consumer must have a bona fide personal
financial emergency that necessitates
consummating the credit transaction before
the end of the waiting period. Whether a
bona fide personal financial emergency must
be met before the end of the waiting period
is determined by the facts surrounding
individual situations. The imminent sale of
the consumer’s home at foreclosure during
the waiting period is one example of a bona
fide personal financial emergency. Each
consumer entitled to receive the required
disclosures must sign the written statement
for the waiver to be effective.
2. Examples. Assume the early disclosures
are delivered to the consumer in person on
Monday, June 1, and at that time the
consumer executes a waiver of the sevenbusiness-day waiting period (which would
end on Tuesday, June 9) so that the loan can
be consummated on Friday, June 5:
i. If the APR on the early disclosures is
inaccurate under § 226.22, the creditor must
provide a corrected disclosure to the
consumer before consummation, which
triggers the three-business-day waiting period
in § 226.19(a)(2). After the consumer receives
the corrected disclosure, the consumer must
execute a waiver of the three-business-day
waiting period in order to consummate the
transaction on June 5.
ii. If a change occurs that does not render
the APR on the early disclosures inaccurate
under § 226.22, the creditor must disclose the
changed terms before consummation,
consistent with § 226.17(f). Disclosure of the
changed terms does not trigger an additional
waiting period, and the transaction may be
consummated on June 5 without obtaining an
additional modification or waiver from the
consumer.
19(a)(5)(ii) Time of disclosures for
timeshare plans.
1. Timing and use of estimates. A mortgage
transaction secured by a consumer’s interest
in a ‘‘timeshare plan,’’ as defined in 11 U.S.C.
101(53D), that is also a federally related
mortgage loan under RESPA is subject to the
requirements of § 226.19(a)(5) instead of the
requirements of § 226.19(a)(1) through
§ 226.19(a)(4). See comment 19(a)(1)(i)–1.
Early disclosures for transactions subject to
§ 226.19(a)(5) must be given (a) before
consummation or (b) within three business
days after the creditor receives the
consumer’s written application, whichever is
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
earlier. The general definition of ‘‘business
day’’ in § 226.2(a)(6)—a day on which the
creditor’s offices are open to the public for
substantially all functions—applies for
purposes of § 226.19(a)(5)(ii). See comment
2(a)(6)–1. These timing requirements are
different than the timing requirements under
§ 226.19(a)(1)(i). Although timeshare
transactions covered by § 226.19(a)(5) are not
subject to the seven-business-day waiting
period in § 226.19(a)(1)(i), in all other
respects, the early disclosure requirements
under § 226.19(a)(5)(ii) apply in the same
manner as the requirements under
§ 226.19(a)(1)(i). For example, the
commentary to § 226.19(a)(1)(i) concerning
the permissible use of estimates and the
definition of ‘‘written application’’ under
§ 226.19(a)(1)(i) also apply to
§ 226.19(a)(5)(ii). See comments 19(a)(1)(i)–2
and 19(a)(1)(i)–3.
19(a)(5)(iii) Redisclosure for timeshare
plans.
1. Consummation or settlement. For
extensions of credit secured by a consumer’s
timeshare plan, when corrected disclosures
are required, they must be given no later than
‘‘consummation or settlement.’’
‘‘Consummation’’ is defined in § 226.2(a).
‘‘Settlement’’ is defined in Regulation X (24
CFR 3500.2(b)) and is subject to any
interpretations issued under RESPA and
Regulation X. In some cases, a creditor may
delay redisclosure until settlement, which
may be at a time later than consummation.
If a creditor chooses to redisclose at
settlement, disclosures may be based on the
terms in effect at settlement, rather than at
consummation. For example, in a variablerate transaction, a creditor may choose to
base disclosures on the terms in effect at
settlement, despite the general rule in the
commentary to section 18(f) that variable-rate
disclosures should be based on the terms in
effect at consummation. Although the threebusiness-day waiting period in § 226.19(a)(2)
does not apply to timeshare transactions, in
all other respects the requirements for
corrected disclosures under § 226.19(a)(5)(iii)
apply in the same manner as the
requirements under § 226.19(a)(2). For
example, to make corrected disclosures, the
creditor may provide a complete set of new
disclosures or may redisclose only those
terms that vary from those originally
disclosed. See comment 19(a)(2)–2.fi
Supplement I to Part 226 [Amended]
7. In Supplement I to Part 226, under
Section 226.31—General Rules, heading
Paragraph 31(c)(2) Disclosures for
reverse mortgages and paragraph
31(c)(2)–1 are revised, to read as
follows:
Subpart E—Special Rules for Certain
Home Mortgage Transactions
*
*
*
*
*
Section 226.31—General Rules
*
*
*
*
*
øParagraph¿ 31(c)(2) Disclosures for
reverse mortgages.
1. Business days. For purposes of
providing reverse mortgage disclosures,
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 10, 2008 / Proposed Rules
‘‘business day’’ has the same meaning as in
comment 31(c)(1)–ø2¿fl1fi—all calendar
days except Sundays and the federal legal
holidays listed in 5 U.S.C. 6103(a). This
means if disclosures are provided on a
Friday, consummation could occur any time
on Tuesday, the third business day following
receipt of the disclosures.
*
*
*
*
*
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, December 4, 2008.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8–29123 Filed 12–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–23646; Directorate
Identifier 2006–CE–005–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Air Tractor,
Inc., Models AT–400, AT–401, AT–
401B, AT–402, AT–402A, and AT–402B
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We propose to revise
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2006–08–
08, which applies to certain Air Tractor,
Inc. (Air Tractor), Models AT–400, AT–
401, AT–401B, AT–402, AT–402A, and
AT–402B airplanes. AD 2006–08–08
currently requires you to repetitively
eddy current inspect the wing lower
spar cap in order to reach the safe life
and, for certain Models AT–402A and
AT–402B airplanes and those that
incorporate or have incorporated
Marburger Enterprises, Inc. (Marburger),
winglets, lowers the safe life for the
wing lower spar cap. Since we issued
AD 2006–08–08, we have received
information to update inspection
intervals for the Models AT–401B, AT–
402A, and AT–402B airplanes based on
a revised damage tolerance analysis.
Consequently, this proposed AD would
not only retain the actions of AD 2006–
08–08, but would reduce the number of
repetitive inspections for all affected
Model AT–401B airplanes and certain
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:07 Dec 09, 2008
Jkt 217001
Models AT–402A and AT–402B
airplanes. We are proposing this AD to
prevent fatigue cracks from occurring in
the wing lower spar cap before the
originally established safe life is
reached. Fatigue cracks in the wing
lower spar cap, if not detected and
corrected, could result in wing
separation and loss of control of the
airplane.
We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by February 9, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to comment on this proposed
AD:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Air Tractor,
Inc., P.O. Box 485, Olney, Texas 76374;
telephone: (940) 564–5616; facsimile:
(940) 564–5612; Internet: https://
www.airtractor.com; or Marburger
Enterprises, Inc., 1227 Hillcourt,
Williston, North Dakota 58801;
telephone: (800) 893–1420 or (701) 774–
0230; facsimile: (701) 572–2602.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct all questions to:
—For airplanes that do not incorporate
and never have incorporated
Marburger winglets: Rob Romero,
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Fort Worth
Airplane Certification Office, 2601
Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth,
Texas 76193–0150; telephone: (817)
222–5102; facsimile: (817) 222–5960;
and
—For airplanes that incorporate or have
incorporated Marburger Enterprises,
Inc., winglets: John Cecil, Aerospace
Engineer, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, 3960
Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood,
California, 90712; telephone: (562)
627–5228; facsimile: (562) 627–5210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
74999
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your
comments to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include the docket
number, ‘‘FAA–2006–23646; Directorate
Identifier 2006–CE–005–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
concerning this proposed AD.
Discussion
An Air Tractor Model AT–502A
experienced an in-flight wing
separation. As a result, the FAA issued
AD 2000–14–51 as an emergency AD.
That AD required the inspection of the
wing lower spar cap for cracks on Air
Tractor Models AT–501, AT–502, and
AT–502A airplanes and modification or
replacement of any cracked wing lower
spar cap. Since the release of that AD,
the manufacturer has evaluated the AT–
400, AT–500, AT–600, and AT–800
series lower spar cap fatigue life.
AD 2006–08–08 currently requires
you to repetitively eddy current inspect
the wing lower spar cap for fatigue
cracks in order to reach the safe life and,
for certain Models AT–402A and AT–
402B airplanes and those that
incorporate or have incorporated
Marburger winglets, lowers the safe life
for the wing lower spar cap.
Since we issued AD 2006–08–08, we
have received updated inspection
intervals for fatigue cracks for the
Models AT–401B, AT–402A, and AT–
402B airplanes based on a revised
damage tolerance analysis. Any
occurrence of fatigue cracks in the wing
lower spar cap, if not detected and
corrected, could result in wing
separation and loss of control of the
airplane.
The following table contains AD
actions that address the wing spar safe
life of the Air Tractor airplane fleet:
E:\FR\FM\10DEP1.SGM
10DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 74989-74999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-29123]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 10, 2008 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 74989]]
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 226
[Regulation Z; Docket No. R-1340]
Truth in Lending
AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On July 30, 2008, the Board published a final rule amending
Regulation Z, which implements the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and the
Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA). The July 2008 final
rule requires creditors to give consumers transaction-specific cost
disclosures shortly after application for closed-end loans secured by a
consumer's principal dwelling. The disclosures must be provided before
the consumer pays any fee, other than a fee for obtaining the
consumer's credit history. Also on July 30, 2008, the Congress enacted
the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, which included
amendments to TILA, known as the Mortgage Disclosure Improvement Act of
2008 (MDIA). On October 3, 2008, the Congress amended the MDIA in
connection with its enactment of the Emergency Economic Stabilization
Act of 2008 (``Stabilization Act''). The Board is now proposing
revisions to Regulation Z to implement the provisions of the MDIA, as
amended.
The MDIA broadens and adds to the requirements of the Board's July
2008 final rule. Among other things, the MDIA requires early,
transaction-specific disclosures for mortgage loans secured by
dwellings other than the consumer's principal dwelling and requires
waiting periods between the time when disclosures are given and
consummation of the transaction. Moreover, these requirements of the
MDIA will become effective on July 30, 2009, about two months earlier
than the Board's regulatory amendments adopted in the July 2008 final
rule.
Consistent with the MDIA, the proposed amendments to Regulation Z
would require creditors to deliver good faith estimates of the required
mortgage disclosures or place them in the mail no later than three
business days after receiving a consumer's application for a dwelling-
secured closed-end loan. The delivery or mailing of these disclosures
would have to occur at least seven business days before consummation.
If the annual percentage rate provided in the good faith estimates
changes beyond a stated tolerance, creditors must provide corrected
disclosures, which the consumer must receive at least three business
days before consummation of the transaction. The proposal would allow
consumers to expedite consummation to meet a bona fide personal
financial emergency. The MDIA, as amended by the Stabilization Act,
specifies different requirements for providing early disclosures for
mortgage transactions secured by a consumer's interest in a timeshare
plan.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 23, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the proposed amendments to
regulation Z, identified by Docket No. R-1340, by any of the following
methods:
Agency Web Site: https://www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments at https://www.federalreserve.gov/
generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: regs.comments@federalreserve.gov. Include the
docket number in the subject line of the message.
Fax: (202) 452-3819 or (202) 452-3102.
Mail: Address to Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20551.
All public comments will be made available on the Board's web site
at https://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm as
submitted, unless modified for technical reasons. Accordingly, comments
will not be edited to remove any identifying or contact information.
Public comments may also be viewed electronically or in paper in Room
MP-500 of the Board's Martin Building (20th and C Streets, NW) between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on weekdays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jamie Z. Goodson or Nikita M. Pastor,
Attorneys; Division of Consumer and Community Affairs, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551, at (202)
452-2412 or (202) 452-3667. For users of Telecommunications Device for
the Deaf (TDD) only, contact (202) 263-4869.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
One of the purposes of the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C.
1601 et seq., is to promote the informed use of consumer credit by
requiring disclosures about its terms and cost. The act requires
creditors to disclose the cost of credit as a dollar amount (the
finance charge) and as an annual percentage rate (APR). Uniformity in
creditors' disclosures is intended to assist consumers in comparison
shopping. TILA requires additional disclosures for loans secured by
consumers' homes and permits consumers to rescind certain transactions
that involve their principal dwelling.
TILA mandates that the Board prescribe regulations to carry out the
purposes of the act. 15 U.S.C. 1604(a). TILA is implemented by the
Board's Regulation Z. 12 CFR part 226. An Official Staff Commentary
interprets the requirements of the regulation and provides guidance to
creditors in applying the rules to specific transactions. 12 CFR part
226 (Supp. I).
TILA Section 128, 15 U.S.C. 1638, requires creditors to make
specified disclosures in connection with closed-end consumer credit
transactions before the credit is extended. Before enactment of the
MDIA, in connection with certain mortgage loans, creditors were
required to make good faith estimates of such disclosures (``early
disclosures'') before the credit is extended or within three business
days after the consumer has submitted an application, whichever is
earlier. 15 U.S.C. 1638(b)(2). In implementing TILA Section 128,
Regulation Z requires creditors to give these early disclosures only
for loans that finance the purchase or initial construction of a
consumer's principal dwelling. On July 30, 2008, the Board published a
final rule amending Regulation Z (the July 2008 final rule)
[[Page 74990]]
(73 FR 44522). The July 2008 final rule requires, among other things,
that a creditor provide these early disclosures even when the loan is
not for the purpose of financing the purchase or initial construction
of the principal dwelling. Under the July 2008 final rule, the early
disclosures also must be provided for non-purchase closed-end loans
secured by the consumer's principal dwelling (such as a refinance
loan). The July 2008 final rule also required these disclosures to be
given before the consumer pays any fee, other than a bona fide and
reasonable fee for reviewing credit history. As published, these
provisions of the July 2008 final rule are scheduled to become
effective on October 1, 2009 (73 FR at 55494).
On the same day that the July 2008 final rule was published,
Congress amended TILA by enacting the Mortgage Disclosure Improvement
Act of 2008 (MDIA).\1\ The MDIA amends TILA and codifies some of the
early disclosure requirements of the July 2008 final rule, but also
expands upon the regulatory provisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The MDIA is contained in Sections 2501 through 2503 of the
Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA), Pub. L. 110-289,
enacted on July 30, 2008. The MDIA was amended by the Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, Pub. L. 110-343, enacted on
October 3, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Like the July 2008 final rule, the MDIA requires creditors to make
the early disclosures even when the loan is not for the purpose of
financing the purchase or initial construction of the consumer's
principal dwelling and prohibits the collection of fees before the
consumer receives the disclosures, other than a fee for obtaining a
consumer's credit history. However, the MDIA applies these provisions
to loans secured by a dwelling even when it is not the consumer's
principal dwelling. Moreover, the MDIA imposes additional requirements
not contained in the July 2008 final rule. Under the MDIA, for loans
secured by a consumer's dwelling, creditors must deliver or mail the
early disclosures at least seven business days before consummation. If
the APR contained in the early disclosures becomes inaccurate (for
example, due to a change in the loan terms), creditors must
``redisclose'' and provide corrected disclosures that the consumer must
receive at least three business days before consummation. The
disclosures also must inform consumers that they are not obligated to
complete the transaction simply because disclosures were provided or
because the consumer has applied for the loan. The MDIA imposes
different requirements for early disclosure in closed-end mortgage
transactions that are secured by a consumer's interest in a timeshare
plan.\2\ These provisions of the MDIA will become effective on July 30,
2009, which is about two months earlier than the effective date of the
July 2008 final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The MDIA also increases the dollar amounts of civil
liability for TILA violations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At this time, the Board is proposing only to conform Regulation Z,
as amended on July 30, 2008, to the MDIA provisions that become
effective on July 30, 2009. The MDIA also contains additional
disclosure requirements for variable-rate transactions that are not
addressed in this proposed rulemaking. Those provisions of the MDIA
will not become effective until January 30, 2011, or any earlier
compliance date ultimately established by the Board. This proposal does
not address those disclosures. The Board anticipates issuing proposed
amendments to Regulation Z to implement those provisions of the MDIA
during 2009, in connection with the Board's comprehensive review of
closed-end mortgage disclosures that is currently underway.
As discussed above, the MDIA contains several provisions that
mirror the July 2008 final rule. These provisions are not discussed
below because they are explained in detail in the supplementary
information portion of the July 2008 final rule. (See 73 FR 44522; July
30, 2008). Final rules adopting this proposal would become effective
July 30, 2009, pursuant to MDIA. In addition, to conform with the MDIA,
certain regulatory changes that the Board adopted in July 2008 will
also become effective on July 30, 2009 (and not on October 1, 2009 as
originally provided in the July 2008 final rule). These regulatory
changes are: The requirement that early disclosures be given for
dwelling-secured mortgage transactions rather than only for
``residential mortgage transactions'' to finance the purchase of
initial construction of the dwelling (in Sec. Sec. 226.17(f) and
226.19(a)(1)(i) and associated commentary) and that early disclosures
be given before consumers pay any fee except a fee for obtaining the
consumer's credit history (in Sec. 226.19(a)(1)(ii) and (iii) and
associated commentary).
Minor conforming and technical amendments to Regulation Z are also
being proposed.
II. Section-by-Section Analysis of Proposed Regulatory Provisions
A. Coverage of Sec. 226.19
TILA Section 128(a) requires creditors to disclose certain
information for closed-end consumer credit transactions, including, for
example, the amount financed and the APR. TILA Section 128(b)(2)
requires creditors to make good faith estimates of these disclosures
within three business days of receiving the consumer's application, or
before consummation if that occurs earlier. Until the recent enactment
of the MDIA, TILA Section 128(b)(2) applied only to a ``residential
mortgage transaction'' subject to the Real Estate Settlement Procedures
Act (RESPA). See 15 U.S.C. 1602(w). A residential mortgage transaction
is defined in TILA as a loan to finance the purchase or initial
construction of a consumer's dwelling. Regulation Z limits the
definition to transactions secured by the consumer's principal
dwelling. See Sec. 226.2(a)(24).
The MDIA extends the early disclosure requirement in TILA Section
128(b)(2) to additional types of loans. Under the MDIA, early
disclosures are required for ``any extension of credit secured by the
dwelling of a consumer.'' Thus, as amended, the statute requires early
disclosures for home refinance loans and home equity loans. This is
consistent with revisions made by the Board's July 2008 final rule.
This proposal would, however, amend Regulation Z to also apply the
early disclosure requirements to loans secured by dwellings other than
the consumer's principal dwelling. Accordingly, proposed Sec.
226.19(a)(1)(i) would require creditors to give consumers early
disclosures in connection with dwelling-secured credit (if also subject
to RESPA), whether or not the loan is for the purpose of financing the
purchase or initial construction of the consumer's principal dwelling.
As is currently the case, Sec. 226.19(a)(1)(i) as proposed to be
revised would not apply to home equity lines of credit (HELOCs), which
are subject to the rules for open-end credit in Sec. 226.5b; the July
2008 final rule also did not apply to HELOCs. As discussed in detail in
part II.G of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, however, the Board is
requesting comment on the timing of HELOC disclosures, in connection
with the review of content and format requirements for HELOC
disclosures by Board staff that currently is under way.
TILA Section 128(b)(2) (as amended by the MDIA) applies to
dwelling-secured mortgage transactions if they also are subject to
RESPA. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD)
Regulation X implements RESPA. See 12 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.; 24 CFR
3500.1 et seq. In March 2008, HUD published a proposal to
[[Page 74991]]
amend Regulation X. (See 73 FR 14030; Mar. 14, 2008). In November 2008,
HUD published final rules amending Regulation X. (See 73 FR 68204; Nov.
17, 2008). The Board believes that these proposed amendments to
Regulation Z's timing requirements for early disclosures remain
consistent with timing requirements for good faith estimates of
settlement costs under Regulation X, as amended. Consistency between
Regulation Z and Regulation X are discussed below in part IV of the
Supplementary Information. The Board requests comment about ways to
further conform Regulation Z's disclosure timing requirements for
dwelling-secured credit to the disclosure timing requirements in HUD's
Regulation X, as amended.
B. Timing of Delivery of Early Disclosures--Sec. 226.19(a)(1)(i)
Currently under Regulation Z, creditors must provide the early
disclosures within three business days after receiving the consumer's
written application or before consummation, whichever is earlier. The
MDIA amends TILA to require creditors to deliver or mail the early
disclosures no later than three business days after receiving the
consumer's application and at least seven business days before
consummation. The Board is proposing to further amend Sec.
226.19(a)(1)(i), as published in the July 2008 final rule, to reflect
this change. Proposed comment 19(a)(1)(i)-6 would be added to clarify
that consummation could occur any time on the seventh business day
following delivery or mailing; the proposed comment provides examples
to facilitate compliance.
The MDIA provides that consumers must receive the early disclosures
before paying any fee in connection with the mortgage application
(other than for obtaining the consumer's credit history) and further
provides that if the disclosures are mailed, the consumer is considered
to have received them three business days after they are mailed. This
provision of the MDIA merely codifies Sec. 226.19(a)(1)(ii) and (iii)
of Regulation Z, as adopted in the Board's July 2008 final rule.
Accordingly, no further revisions to Sec. 226.19(a)(1)(ii) or (iii)
are being proposed at this time.
Revisions would also be made to comment 19(a)(1)(i)-3 to conform a
reference to HUD's Regulation X to the current language in that
regulation.
C. Redisclosure Requirements--Sec. 226.19(a)(2)
Currently, when a creditor provides early TILA disclosures and the
APR subsequently changes beyond the specified tolerance, the creditor
must redisclose the APR and other changed terms no later than
consummation or settlement. The MDIA amends TILA Section 128(b)(2) to
require that creditors make corrected disclosures that consumers must
receive at least three business days before consummation in such
circumstances. The MDIA removes the reference to ``settlement'' for
purposes of this requirement. (For mortgage transactions secured by a
consumer's interest in a timeshare plan, however, the MDIA requires
creditors to disclose changed terms at the time of consummation or
settlement, as discussed below.) The Board is proposing to amend Sec.
226.19(a)(2) to reflect this change. Under the proposal, consummation
can occur anytime on the third business day after the consumer receives
the corrected disclosure.
The MDIA also provides that if the corrected disclosures are
mailed, the consumer is considered to receive the disclosures three
business days after mailing. This is consistent with the presumption
the Board adopted in the July 2008 final rule in Sec.
226.19(a)(1)(ii), which applies when the early disclosures are mailed;
those disclosures must be received by the consumer before fees are
collected (other than a credit report fee). The Board is proposing to
revise comment 19(a)(2)-1 to provide examples illustrating the effect
of the three-business-day waiting period and when consummation may
occur.
Comment 19(a)(2)-3 would be revised to clarify that the three-
business-day waiting period before consummation begins when the
disclosures are received by the consumer and not when they are mailed.
This is consistent with the rules for certain high-cost loans and
reverse mortgage transactions, which also require a creditor to make
disclosures at least three business days before consummation. See Sec.
226.31(c) and comment 31(c)-1.
D. Definition of ``Business Day''--Sec. 226.2(a)(6)
The MDIA provides that if the early disclosures are mailed to the
consumer, the consumer is considered to have received them three
business days after they are mailed. This presumption is important to
two provisions in the MDIA: (1) The prohibition on collecting fees
before the consumer receives the early disclosures; and (2) the
requirement, if the APR in the early disclosures becomes inaccurate,
that creditors make corrected disclosures, which consumers must receive
at least three business days before consummation.
In the July 2008 final rule, the Board revised the definition of
``business day'' to clarify how creditors should count weekends and
federal legal public holidays in determining when mailed disclosures
are presumed to be received and how long the restriction on fees
applies under Sec. 226.19(a)(1)(ii). See 73 FR 44599. The Board is
proposing to further revise the definition of ``business day'' to
clarify that creditors should count ``business days'' the same way for
purposes of the presumption in proposed Sec. 226.19(a)(2) that
consumers receive corrected disclosures three business days after they
are mailed.
Currently, Sec. 226.2(a)(6) contains two definitions of ``business
day.'' Under the general definition, a ``business day'' is a day on
which the creditor's offices are open to the public for carrying on
substantially all of its business functions. However, for some purposes
a more precise definition applies; ``business day'' means all calendar
days except Sundays and specified federal legal public holidays, for
purposes of Sec. Sec. 226.15(e), 226.23(a), and 226.31(c)(1) and (2).
The July 2008 final rule adopted the more precise definition for use in
determining when mailed disclosures are presumed to be received under
Sec. 226.19(a)(1)(ii), and this definition would also apply for
purposes of proposed Sec. 226.19(a)(2).
Under the MDIA, creditors must deliver the early disclosures, or
place them in the mail, no later than three business days after
receiving a consumer's application for dwelling-secured credit; the
delivery or mailing also must occur at least seven business days before
consummation. Under the Board's proposal, the general definition of
business day would be used for purposes of satisfying these timing
requirements, which are contained in proposed Sec. 226.19(a)(1)(i).
This would ensure consistency with RESPA's requirement that creditors
provide good faith estimates of settlement costs not later than three
business days after the creditor receives the consumer's application
for a federally related mortgage loan. See 24 CFR 3500.2(b) and 3500.7.
In order to simplify the rule, the general definition of business day
would also be used for determining when the 7-day waiting period has
expired and consummation may occur. The Board requests comment,
however, on whether the more precise definition of business day should
be used to facilitate compliance with the seven business day waiting
period requirement.
[[Page 74992]]
E. Consumer's Waiver of Waiting Period Before Consummation--Sec.
226.19(a)(3)
Under the MDIA, to expedite consummation of a mortgage transaction,
a consumer may modify or waive the timing requirements for the early
disclosures when the consumer determines that the credit extension is
needed to meet a bona fide personal financial emergency. However, the
consumer must receive the disclosures required by Sec. 226.18 at or
before the time of the consumer's modification or waiver.
To implement this provision, proposed Sec. 226.19(a)(3) would
permit the consumer to shorten or waive the seven-business-day period
required by Sec. 226.19(a)(1)(i) or the three-business-day waiting
period required by Sec. 226.19(a)(2). As required by the MDIA, a
consumer may shorten or waive the pre-consummation waiting period only
if the consumer has received accurate TILA disclosures reflecting the
final costs and terms. Accordingly, if the consumer waives the seven-
business-day waiting period based on the early disclosures, and a
change occurs that makes the APR inaccurate (as determined under Sec.
226.22), the consumer must receive corrected disclosures before
consummation. In that circumstance, the three-business-day waiting
period in Sec. 226.19(a)(2) would apply unless the consumer provides a
waiver after receiving the corrected disclosures. Proposed comment
19(a)(3)-2 provides examples that illustrate whether a consumer who
receives corrected disclosures does or does not need to provide a new
modification or waiver statement.
Under proposed Sec. 226.19(a)(3), the consumer must give the
creditor a dated written statement describing the emergency and
specifically modifying or waiving the waiting period(s). All consumers
entitled to receive the disclosures would have to sign the statement.
Proposed Sec. 226.19(a)(3) would prohibit the use of printed forms.
The proposed provisions concerning the modification or waiver of the
waiting periods are substantially similar to the provisions for waiving
the right to rescind and waiving the three-business-day waiting period
before consummating certain high-cost mortgage loans. See Sec. Sec.
226.15(e), 226.23(e), and 226.31(c)(1)(iii). The Board solicits comment
on the proposed modification or waiver procedures, especially whether
such procedures should be more or less flexible than existing
procedures for modifying or waiving the rescission right or the waiting
period before high-cost consummating mortgage transactions covered by
Sec. 226.32(a). In particular, the Board asks commenters to discuss
any specific procedural or other adjustments the Board should make to
implement the MDIA provisions that permit such modification or waiver.
Proposed comment 19(a)(3)-1 clarifies that a consumer may modify or
waive the required waiting period(s) only if the consumer has a bona
fide personal financial emergency that must be met before the end of
the waiting period(s). This comment is consistent with commentary on
waiving the rescission period and the pre-consummation waiting period
required for certain high-cost mortgage transactions. See comments
15(e)-1, 23(e)-1, and 31(c)(1)(iii)-1. The proposed comment explains
that whether a bona fide personal financial emergency exists would be
determined by the facts surrounding individual circumstances. The
imminent sale of the consumer's home at foreclosure during the three-
business-day waiting period is provided as an example. This example is
the same as the example in existing staff commentary on modifying or
waiving the waiting period required with certain high-cost mortgage
loans. See comment 31(c)(1)(iii)-1.
The Board solicits comment on whether under proposed Sec.
226.19(a)(3) modification or waiver should be permitted only if the
consumer's bona fide personal financial emergency must be met before
the end of the required waiting period. The Board also requests comment
on whether there are circumstances, other than pending foreclosure,
where the consumer may want to consummate the transaction before the
end of: (1) The seven-business-day waiting period after early
disclosures are made; (2) the three-business-day waiting period, if the
creditor is required to make corrected disclosures; or (3) either
period.
F. Notice--Sec. 226.19(a)(4)
The MDIA requires that the early disclosures contain a clear and
conspicuous notice containing the following statement: ``You are not
required to complete this agreement merely because you have received
these disclosures or signed a loan application.'' Under proposed Sec.
226.19(a)(4), creditors would have to include that statement in the
early disclosures, as well as in any corrected disclosures required by
Sec. 226.19(a)(2). The Board expects that requiring the notice in
corrected disclosures would impose minimal, if any, burden on
creditors. The Board requests comment on proposed Sec. 226.19(a)(4),
including any benefits to consumers or burdens to creditors that may
result from the proposed requirement. The Board also solicits comment
on whether the statement should be provided in substantially similar
form using terms that are easier for consumers to understand.
G. Timeshare Plans--Sec. 226.19(a)(5)
Proposed Sec. 226.19(a)(5) sets forth the requirements for
extensions of credit secured by a consumer's interest in a ``timeshare
plan'' (timeshare transactions), as defined in the bankruptcy laws (see
11 U.S.C. Sec. 101(53D)). Pursuant to amendments made to the MDIA in
the Stabilization Act, the disclosure requirements and the fee
restriction added by the MDIA are not applicable to these transactions,
which instead are subject to the same early disclosure requirements
that applied to ``residential mortgage transactions'' under TILA
Section 128(b)(2) before the MDIA was enacted. Accordingly, for
timeshare transactions creditors must make good faith estimates of the
disclosures required by Sec. 226.18 before credit is extended, or must
deliver or place the early disclosures in the mail within three
business days (days the creditor's offices are open to the public for
substantially all business functions) after the creditor receives the
consumer's application, whichever is earlier. The seven-business-day
waiting period and three-business-day waiting period before
consummation, contained in proposed Sec. Sec. 226.19(a)(1)(i) and
226.19(a)(2) respectively, do not apply to timeshare transactions.
If the APR stated in the early disclosures changes beyond the
specified tolerance, proposed Sec. 226.19(a)(5)(iii) requires
creditors to disclose all the changed terms no later than consummation
or settlement of the transaction. This is consistent with the existing
rules for residential mortgage transactions in Sec. 226.19(a)(2). The
discussion in proposed comment 19(a)(5)(iii)-1 of disclosing changed
terms no later than ``consummation'' or ``settlement'' for timeshare
transactions is based on current comments 19(a)(2)-3 and 19(a)(2)-4.
Currently, comment 19(a)(2)-3 states that ``consummation'' is defined
in Sec. 226.2(a), whereas ``date of settlement'' is defined in HUD's
Regulation X (24 CFR 3500.2(a)). Comment 19(a)(2)-4 currently explains
that when a creditor delays redisclosure until settlement, which may be
at a time later than consummation, disclosures may be based on the
terms in effect at settlement, rather than the terms in effect at
settlement. As discussed above,
[[Page 74993]]
for transactions other than timeshare transactions, the MDIA amends
TILA to remove reference to ``settlement'' from TILA's provisions
requiring creditors to make corrected disclosures. Under the MDIA,
consumers must receive any corrected disclosures at least three
business days before consummation.
The Board solicits comment on the costs and benefits of basing the
timing requirements for corrected disclosures solely on the time of
consummation, for purposes of non-timeshare transactions, but on the
time of consummation or settlement, for purposes of timeshare
transactions. If Regulation Z's timing requirements for corrected
disclosures should be consistent for timeshare transactions and non-
timeshare transactions, should Regulation Z require creditors to make
corrected disclosures at the time of consummation (rather than the time
of consummation or settlement), for purposes of timeshare transactions?
Or should Regulation Z require creditors to make corrected disclosures
three business days before the later of consummation or settlement, for
purposes of covered transactions other than timeshare transactions?
H. Solicitation of Comments on Timing of Disclosures for Home Equity
Lines of Credit
The MDIA applies only to closed-end loans secured by a consumer's
dwelling and does not affect the disclosure requirements for open-end
credit plans secured by a dwelling (home equity lines of credit, or
HELOCs). In connection with the Board's comprehensive review of
mortgage transactions, the Board's staff is currently reviewing the
content and format of HELOC disclosures and subjecting them to consumer
testing. A proposal to improve the disclosures is anticipated next
year. To aid in this review, the Board seeks comment on whether it is
necessary or appropriate to change the timing of HELOC disclosures and,
if so, what changes should be made.
Under current rules, consumers typically receive non-transaction
specific disclosures describing the creditor's HELOC plan at the time
they receive an application. See 12 CFR 226.5b. Creditors must provide
more detailed disclosures at account opening, before the first
transaction. See 12 CFR 226.6. The Board seeks comment on whether
transaction-specific disclosures (such as the APR, an itemization of
fees, and potential payment amounts) should be required after
application but significantly earlier than account opening, at least in
some circumstances. For example, many consumers take a major draw on
the account as soon as they open it. These consumers may use the funds
to finance a home purchase (usually, but not necessarily, with a
simultaneous closed-end loan) or an immediate expense (such as a
college tuition bill). Would a requirement to disclose final HELOC
terms, including the APR and fees, three days before account opening
substantially benefit consumers who plan to draw immediately? Comment
is also solicited on the potential costs and whether they would
outweigh potential benefits.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506; 5 CFR Part 1320 Appendix A.1), the Board reviewed the
proposed rule under the authority delegated to the Board by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB). The collection of information that is
required by this proposed rule is found in 12 CFR part 226. The Federal
Reserve may not conduct or sponsor, and an organization is not required
to respond to, this information collection unless the information
collection displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB
control number is 7100-0199.
This information collection is required to provide benefits for
consumers and is mandatory (15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.). Since the Federal
Reserve does not collect any information, no issue of confidentiality
arises. The respondents/recordkeepers are creditors and other entities
subject to Regulation Z, including for-profit financial institutions
and small businesses.
TILA and Regulation Z are intended to ensure effective disclosure
of the costs and terms of credit to consumers. For open-end credit,
creditors are required to, among other things, disclose information
about the initial costs and terms and to provide periodic statements of
account activity, notice of changes in terms, and statements of rights
concerning billing error procedures. Regulation Z requires specific
types of disclosures for credit and charge card accounts and home
equity plans. For closed-end loans, such as mortgage and installment
loans, cost disclosures are required to be provided prior to
consummation. Special disclosures are required in connection with
certain products, such as reverse mortgages, certain variable-rate
loans, and certain mortgages with rates and fees above specified
thresholds. TILA and Regulation Z also contain rules concerning credit
advertising. Creditors are required to retain evidence of compliance
for twenty-four months (Sec. 226.25), but Regulation Z does not
specify the types of records that must be retained.
Under the PRA, the Federal Reserve accounts for the paperwork
burden associated with Regulation Z for the state member banks and
other creditors supervised by the Federal Reserve that engage in
lending covered by Regulation Z and, therefore, are respondents under
the PRA. Appendix I of Regulation Z defines the Federal Reserve-
regulated institutions as: State member banks, branches and agencies of
foreign banks (other than federal branches, federal agencies, and
insured state branches of foreign banks), commercial lending companies
owned or controlled by foreign banks, and organizations operating under
section 25 or 25A of the Federal Reserve Act. Other federal agencies
account for the paperwork burden imposed on the entities for which they
have administrative enforcement authority. The current total annual
burden to comply with the provisions of Regulation Z is estimated to be
578,847 hours for the 1,138 Federal Reserve-regulated institutions that
are deemed to be respondents for the purposes of the PRA. To ease the
burden and cost of complying with Regulation Z (particularly for small
entities), the Federal Reserve provides model forms, which are appended
to the regulation.
The proposed rule would impose a one-time increase in the total
annual burden under Regulation Z for all respondents regulated by the
Federal Reserve by 9,104 hours, from 578,847 to 587,951 hours.
The total estimated burden increase, as well as the estimates of
the burden increase associated with each major section of the proposed
rule as set forth below, represents averages for all respondents
regulated by the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve expects that the
amount of time required to implement each of the proposed changes for a
given institution may vary based on the size and complexity of the
respondent. Furthermore, the burden estimate for this rulemaking does
not include the burden addressing changes to format, timing, and
content requirements for the credit disclosures governed by Regulation
Z as announced in a separate proposed rulemaking (Docket No. R-1286).
The Federal Reserve estimates that 1,138 respondents regulated by
the Federal Reserve would take, on average, 8 hours (one business day)
to update their systems to comply with the proposed disclosure
requirements in Sec. Sec. 226.17 and 226.19. This one-time revision
would increase the burden by 9,104 hours.
[[Page 74994]]
The other federal agencies are responsible for estimating and
reporting to OMB the total paperwork burden for the institutions for
which they have administrative enforcement authority. They may, but are
not required to, use the Federal Reserve's burden estimation
methodology. Using the Federal Reserve's method, the total current
estimated annual burden for all financial institutions subject to
Regulation Z, including Federal Reserve-supervised institutions, would
be approximately 11,671,017 hours. The proposed rule would increase the
estimated annual burden for all institutions subject to Regulation Z by
137,600 hours to 11,808,617 hours. The above estimates represent an
average across all respondents and reflect variations between
institutions based on their size, complexity, and practices. All
covered institutions, of which there are approximately 17,200, are
potentially affected by this collection of information, and thus are
respondents for purposes of the PRA.
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the Federal
Reserve's functions; including whether the information has practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the Federal Reserve's estimate of the
burden of the proposed information collection, including the cost of
compliance; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of
information collection on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology. Comments on the collection of information should be sent to
Michelle Shore, Federal Reserve Board Clearance Officer, Division of
Research and Statistics, Mail Stop 151-A, Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551, with copies of such
comments sent to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork
Reduction Project (7100-0199), Washington, DC 20503.
IV. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, generally
requires an agency to perform an assessment of the impact a rule is
expected to have on small entities.\3\ However, under Section 605(b) of
the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the regulatory flexibility analysis otherwise
required under section 604 of the RFA is not required if an agency
certifies, along with a statement providing the factual basis for such
certification, that the rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The Board believes
that this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The proposed amendments to
Regulation Z are narrowly designed to implement the revisions to the
Truth in Lending Act (TILA) made by the MDIA. Creditors must comply
with the MDIA's requirements when they become effective on July 30,
2009, whether or not the Board amends Regulation Z as proposed. The
Board's proposal is intended to facilitate compliance by eliminating
inconsistencies between Regulation Z's existing requirements and the
statutory requirements imposed by the MDIA starting July 30, 2009. A
final regulatory flexibility analysis will be conducted after
consideration of comments received during the public comment period.
The Board requests public comment in the areas discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Under standards the U.S. Small Business Administration sets
(SBA), an entity is considered ``small'' if it has $175 million or
less in assets for banks and other depository institutions; and $6.5
million or less in revenues for non-bank mortgage lenders, mortgage
brokers, and loan servicers. U.S. Small Business Administration,
Table of Small Business Size Standards Matched to North American
Industry Classification System Codes, available at https://
www.sba.gov/idc/groups/public/documents/sba_homepage/serv_sstd_
tablepdf.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Reasons for the Proposed Rule
Congress enacted the TILA based on findings that economic stability
would be enhanced and competition among consumer credit providers would
be strengthened by the informed use of credit resulting from consumers'
awareness of the cost of credit. One of the stated purposes of TILA is
to provide a meaningful disclosure of credit terms to enable consumers
to compare credit terms available in the marketplace more readily and
avoid the uninformed use of credit. TILA also contains procedural and
substantive protections for consumers. TILA directs the Board to
prescribe regulations to carry out the purposes of the statute. The
Board's Regulation Z implements TILA.
Congress enacted the Mortgage Disclosure Improvement Act of 2008
(MDIA) in 2008 as an amendment to TILA. The MDIA amends TILA's special
disclosure requirements for closed-end mortgage transactions that are
secured by a consumer's dwelling and subject to the Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA). In July 2008, the Board revised
Regulation Z to expand the number of transactions in which creditors
must give a good faith estimate of the required disclosures (``early
disclosures''). Previously, early disclosures were required only for
loans made to finance the purchase or initial construction of a
consumer's principal dwelling. Under the July 2008 final rule,
creditors must provide early disclosures for any transaction secured by
the consumer's principal dwelling, such as a home refinance loan or
home equity loan. The MDIA amends TILA to require early disclosures for
consumer loans secured by any dwelling, even if it is not the
consumer's principal dwelling. As explained in parts I and II of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, the proposal would require creditors to
delay consummating a loan for seven business days after the creditor
makes early disclosures, and three business days after the consumer
receives any required corrected disclosures.
B. Statement of Objectives and Legal Basis
Parts I and II of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION contain a detailed
discussion of the objectives and legal basis for this proposed
rulemaking. In summary, the proposed amendments to Regulation Z are
designed to implement changes that the MDIA makes to TILA. The legal
basis for the proposed rule is in Section 105(a) of TILA.
C. Description of Small Entities to Which the Proposed Rule Would Apply
The proposed regulations would apply to all institutions and
entities that engage in closed-end dwelling-secured lending for
consumer purposes that is subject to RESPA. TILA and Regulation Z have
broad applicability to individuals and businesses that originate even
small numbers of home-secured loans. See Sec. 226.1(c)(1). The Board
is not aware of a reliable source for the total number or asset sizes
of small entities likely to be affected by the proposal. However,
through data from Reports of Condition and Income (``Call Reports'') of
depository institutions and certain subsidiaries of banks and bank
companies, as well as data reported under the Home Mortgage Disclosure
Act (HMDA),\4\ the Board can estimate
[[Page 74995]]
the approximate number of small depository institutions that would be
subject to the proposed rules. For the majority of HMDA respondents
that are not depository institutions, exact asset size information is
not available, although the Board has somewhat reliable estimates based
on self-reporting from approximately five percent of the non-depository
respondents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ HMDA requires lenders to report information annually to
their federal supervisory agencies for each application and loan
acted on during the calendar year. See 12 U.S.C. 2801 et seq. The
loans reported are estimated to represent about 80 percent of all
home lending nationwide and therefore are likely to be broadly
representative of home lending in the United States. Robert B.
Avery, and Kenneth P. Brevoort, and Glenn B. Canner, The 2007 HMDA
Data, 84 Federal Reserve Bulletin (forthcoming 2008) (2007 HMDA
Data) at 2, https://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/bulletin/2008/pdf/
hmda07draft.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on the best information available, the Board makes the
following estimate of small entities that would be affected by this
proposed rule: According to June 2008 Call Report data, approximately
9,670 small depository institutions would be subject to the proposed
rule. Approximately 16,966 depository institutions in the United States
filed Call Report data, approximately 12,392 of which had total
domestic assets of $175 million or less and thus were considered small
entities for purposes of the RFA. Of 4,387 banks, 588 thrifts and 7,278
credit unions that filed Call Report data and were considered small
entities, 4,236 banks, 553 thrifts, and 4,881 credit unions, totaling
9,670 institutions, extended mortgage credit. For purposes of this Call
Report analysis, thrifts include savings banks, savings and loan
entities, co-operative banks and industrial banks. Further, HMDA data
reported in 2008 (for 2007 lending activities) indicate that 1,752 non-
depository institutions (independent mortgage companies, subsidiaries
of a depository institution, or affiliates of a bank holding company)
filed HMDA reports in 2008 for 2007 lending activities.\5\ Based on the
small volume of lending activity reported by these institutions, most
are likely to be small entities. In connection with its proposed
amendments to Regulation Z to implement the MDIA, the Board invites
comment and information on the number and type of small entities that
originate loans secured by a consumer's dwelling and subject to RESPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 2007 HMDA Data at 5-6 and tbl. 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
The compliance requirements of the proposed rules are described in
parts I and II of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. The effect of the
proposed revisions to Regulation Z on small entities is unknown. To
comply with the revised rules, many small entities would be required to
modify their procedures for making credit disclosures for dwelling-
secured mortgage transactions. The precise costs to small entities of
updating their systems and disclosures are difficult to predict. These
costs will depend on a number of unknown factors, including, among
other things, the specifications of the current systems used by such
entities to prepare and provide disclosures. The Board believes that
these costs will not have a significant economic effect on small
entities. The Board seeks information and comment on any costs,
compliance requirements, or changes in operating procedures arising
from the application of the proposed rule to small institutions.
E. Identification of Duplicative, Overlapping, or Conflicting Federal
Rules
The Board has not identified any federal rules that conflict with
the proposed revisions to Regulation Z. As discussed in part II of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, TILA and the Board's proposed revisions to
Regulation Z overlap with RESPA and HUD's Regulation X, which
implements RESPA. TILA's purpose is to inform consumers about loan
terms, and RESPA's is to inform consumers about settlement costs. These
laws overlap with one another because settlement costs may include loan
origination fees, and consumers may finance their settlement costs.
Moreover, the Board's proposed revisions overlap with Regulation X, as
revised by HUD in November 2008, in at least three ways. First, the
proposed revisions apply to an extension of credit that is both secured
by a consumer's dwelling and subject to RESPA. Second, the proposed
revisions continue to cross-reference the definition of ``application''
under Regulation X. Third, the time period following application,
within which creditors would have to make early disclosures under the
Board's proposed rule, is the same as the time period within which
creditors must make good faith estimates of settlement costs under
RESPA--within three business days following application. Moreover, the
proposed early disclosure requirements use a definition of ``business
day'' that is consistent with the ``business day'' definition under
Regulation X.
The MDIA amends TILA to base timing requirements for corrected
disclosures on the date of ``consummation''--rather than on the later
of ``consummation'' and ``settlement''--for purposes of timing rules
for most, but not all, mortgage transactions secured by a consumer's
dwelling. Therefore, for most dwelling-secured mortgage transactions,
the Board's proposed revisions to Regulation Z would remove references
to ``settlement,'' a term defined in Regulation X. These revisions to
Regulation Z and associated commentary thus would reduce overlap with
Regulation X. However, the MDIA's timing requirements for corrected
disclosures for transactions secured by a consumer's interest in a
timeshare plan refer both to ``consummation'' and ``settlement.'' The
Board is requesting comment the costs and benefits of basing the timing
requirements for corrected disclosures solely on the time of
consummation, for purposes of non-timeshare transactions, but on the
time of consummation or settlement, for purposes of timeshare
transactions.
F. Identification of Duplicative, Overlapping, or Conflicting State
Laws
Certain sections of the proposed rules may result in inconsistency
with certain state laws. The closed-end credit disclosure requirements
in TILA that the proposed rules would implement do not annul, alter, or
affect the laws of any State relating to the disclosure of information
in connection with credit transactions, except to the extent those laws
are inconsistent with TILA, and then only to the extent of the
inconsistency. See 15 U.S.C. 1610(a); 12 CFR 226.28(a)(1). Interested
parties may request that the Board determine whether any such
inconsistency exists, in accordance with procedures prescribed in the
Board's regulations. The Board seeks comment regarding any state or
local statutes or regulations that would duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with the proposed rule.
G. Discussion of Significant Alternatives
The Board does not believe that reasonable alternatives to the
proposed rule as a whole exist for implementing the MDIA's disclosure
requirements for closed-end mortgage transactions secured by a
consumer's dwelling and subject to RESPA. The Board is proposing
regulations for the narrow purpose of carrying out its statutory
mandate to implement the Truth in Lending Act, as amended by the MDIA.
The Board nevertheless welcomes comments on any significant
alternatives, consistent with the MDIA's requirements, that would
minimize the impact of the proposed rule on small entities.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 226
Advertising, Consumer protection, Federal Reserve System,
Mortgages, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Truth in lending.
Text of Proposed Revisions
Certain conventions have been used to highlight the proposed
revisions.
[[Page 74996]]
New language, compared to the Regulation Z amendments the Board adopted
in the July 2008 final rule (73 FR 44522; July 30, 2008), is shown
inside bold arrows, and language that would be deleted is set off with
bold brackets.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Board proposes to
amend Regulation Z, 12 CFR part 226, as set forth below:
PART 226--TRUTH IN LENDING (REGULATION Z)
1. The authority citation for part 226 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 3806; 15 U.S.C. 1604, 1637(c)(5), and
1639(l).
Subpart A--General
2. Section 226.2 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(6) to read as
follows:
Sec. 226.2 Definitions and rules of construction.
(a) * * *
(6) Business Day means a day on which the creditor's offices are
open to the public for carrying on substantially all of its business
functions. However, for purposes of rescission under Sec. Sec. 226.15
and 226.23, and for purposes of Sec. 226.19(a)(1)(ii) [rtrif], Sec.
226.19(a)(2),[ltrif] and Sec. 226.31, the term means all calendar days
except Sundays and the legal public holidays specified in 5 U.S.C.
6103(a), such as New Year's Day, the Birthday of Martin Luther King,
Jr., Washington's Birthday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day,
Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day.
* * * * *
Subpart C--Closed-End Credit
3. Section 226.17 is amended by revising paragraph (f) to read as
follows:
Sec. 226.17 General disclosure requirements.
* * * * *
(f) Early disclosures. If disclosures required by this subpart are
given before the date of consummation of a transaction and a subsequent
event makes them inaccurate, the creditor shall disclose before
consummation [lsqbb](except that, for certain mortgage transactions,
Sec. 226.19 permits redisclosure no later than consummation or
settlement, whichever is later).[rsqbb][rtrif](subject to the
provisions of Sec. 226.19(a)(2) and Sec. 226.19(a)(5)(iii)):[ltrif]
\39\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\39\ [Reserved.]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
4. Section 226.19 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and
(a)(2), and adding new paragraphs (a)(3), (a)(4), and (a)(5), to read
as follows:
Sec. 226.19 Certain mortgage and variable-rate transactions.
(a) Mortgage transactions subject to RESPA--(1)(i) Time of
disclosures. In a mortgage transaction subject to the Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act (12 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.) that is secured by
the consumer's [lsqbb]principal[rsqbb] dwelling, other than a home
equity line of credit subject to Sec. 226.5b [rtrif]or mortgage
transaction subject to paragraph (a)(5) of this section[ltrif], the
creditor shall make good faith estimates of the disclosures required by
Sec. 226.18 [lsqbb]before consummation, or shall
deliver[rsqbb][rtrif]. The creditor shall deliver[rsqbb] these good
faith estimates[ltrif] or place them in the mail not later than three
business days after the creditor receives the consumer's written
application, [lsqbb]whichever is earlier.[rsqbb][rtrif]and at least
seven business days before consummation of the transaction.[ltrif]
* * * * *
(2) Redisclosure required. [lsqbb]If the annual percentage rate at
the time of consummation varies from the annual percentage rate
disclosed earlier by more than \1/8\ of 1 percentage point in a regular
transaction or more than \1/4\ of 1 percentage point in an irregular
transaction, as defined in Sec. 226.22, the creditor shall disclose
all the changed terms no later than consummation or
settlement.[rsqbb][rtrif]If the annual percentage rate disclosed in the
good faith estimates required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section
becomes inaccurate under Sec. 226.22, the creditor shall make
corrected disclosures to the consumer under Sec. 226.18 with an
accurate annual percentage rate, as determined under Sec. 226.22, and
all changed terms. The consumer must receive the corrected disclosures
no later than three business days before consummation. If the
disclosures required under this paragraph are mailed to the consumer,
the consumer is deemed to have received the disclosures three business
days after they are mailed.
(3) Consumer's waiver of waiting period before consummation. If the
consumer determines that the extension of credit is needed to meet a
bona fide personal financial emergency, the consumer may modify or
waive the seven-business-day waiting period required by paragraph
(a)(1)(i) of this section or the three-business-day waiting period
required by paragraph (a)(2) of this section, after receiving the
disclosures required by Sec. 226.18. To modify or waive a waiting
period, the consumer shall give the creditor a dated written statement
that describes the emergency, specifically modifies or waives the
waiting period, and bears the signature of all the consumers entitled
to receive the disclosures. Printed forms for this purpose are
prohibited.
(4) Notice. Disclosures made pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) or
paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall contain the following statement:
``You are not required to complete this agreement merely because you
have received these disclosures or signed a loan application.''
(5) Timeshare plans. In a mortgage transaction subject to the Real
Estate Settlement Procedures Act (12 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.) that is
secured by a consumer's interest in a timeshare plan described in 11
U.S.C. 101(53D)):
(i) The requirements of paragraph (a)(1) through (a)(4) of this
section do not apply;
(ii) The creditor shall make good faith estimates of the
disclosures required by Sec. 226.18 before consummation, or shall
deliver or place them in the mail not later than three business days
after the creditor receives the consumer's written application,
whichever is earlier; and
(iii) If the annual percentage rate at the time of consummation
varies from the annual percentage rate disclosed under paragraph
(a)(5)(ii) of this section by more than \1/8\ of 1 percentage point in
a regular transaction or more than \1/4\ of 1 percentage point in an
irregular transaction, as defined in Sec. 226.22, the creditor shall
disclose all the changed terms no later than consummation or
settlement.[ltrif]
* * * * *
5. In Supplement I to Part 226, under Section 226.2--Definitions
and Rules of Construction, 2(a) Definitions, 2(a)(6) Business day,
paragraph 2(a)(6)-2 is revised to read as follows:
Supplement I to Part 226--Official Staff Interpretations
* * * * *
Subpart A--General
* * * * *
Section 226.2--Definitions and Rules of Construction
2(a) Definitions.
* * * * *
2(a)(6) Business day.
* * * * *
2. [lsqbb]Rescission rule[rsqbb][rtrif]Rule for rescission and
disclosures for certain mortgage
[[Page 74997]]
transactions[ltrif]. A more precise rule for what is a business day
(all calendar days except Sundays and the federal legal holidays
specified in 5 U.S.C. 6103(a)) applies when the right of rescission
or the receipt of disclosures for certain [rtrif]dwelling-
secured[ltrif] mortgage transactions under Sec. Sec.
226.19(a)(1)(ii), [rtrif]226.19(a)(2),[ltrif] or [lsqbb]mortgages
subject to Sec. 226.32 are[rsqbb] 226.31(c) [rtrif]is[ltrif]
involved. [lsqbb](See also comment 31(c)(1)-1.)[rsqbb] Four federal
legal holidays are identified in 5 U.S.C. 6103(a) by a specific
date: New Year's Day, January 1; Independence Day, July 4; Veterans
Day, November 11; and Christmas Day, December 25. When one of these
holidays (July 4, for example) falls on a Saturday, federal offices
and other entities might observe the holiday on the preceding Friday
(July 3). [lsqbb]The[rsqbb][rtrif]In cases where the more precise
rule applies, the[ltrif] observed holiday (in the example, July 3)
is a business day [lsqbb]for purposes of rescission or the delivery
of disclosures for certain high-cost mortgages covered by Sec.
226.32[rsqbb].
* * * * *
Subpart C--Closed-End Credit
6. In Supplement I to Part 226, under Section 226.19--Certain
Mortgage and Variable-Rate Transactions, 19(a)(1)(i) Time of
disclosure, paragraphs 19(a)(1)(i)-1 through 19(a)(1)(i)-5 are revised
and new paragraph 19(a)(1)(i)-6 is added, heading Paragraph 19(a)(2)
Redisclosure required and paragraphs 19(a)(2)-1 through 19(a)(2)-3 are
revised and paragraph 19(a)(2)-4 is removed, new heading 19(a)(3)
Consumer's waiver of waiting period before consummation and new
paragraphs 19(a)(3)-1 and 19(a)(3)-2 are added, new heading
19(a)(5)(ii) Time of disclosures for timeshare plans and new paragraph
19(a)(5)(ii)-1 are added, and new heading 19(a)(5)(iii) Redisclosure
for timeshare plans and new paragraph 19(a)(5)(iii)-1 are added, to
read as follows:
Section 226.19--Certain Mortgage and Variable-Rate Transactions
19(a)(1)(i) Time of disclosure.
1. Coverage. This section requires early disclosure of credit
terms in mortgage transactions that are secured by a consumer's
[lsqbb]principal[rsqbb] dwelling [rtrif](other than home equity
lines of credit subject to Sec. 226.5b or mortgage transactions
secured by an interest in a timeshare plan)[ltrif] and also subject
to the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) and its
implementing Regulation X, administered by the Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD). To be covered by Sec. 226.19, a
transaction must be a federally related mortgage loan under RESPA.
``Federally related mortgage loan'' is defined under RESPA (12
U.S.C. 2602) and Regulation X (24 CFR 3500.2), and is subject to any
interpretations by HUD. [lsqbb]RESPA coverage includes such
transactions as loans to purchase dwellings, refinancings of loans
secured by dwellings, and subordinate-lien home-equity loans, among
others. Although RESPA coverage relates to any dwelling, Sec.
226.19(a) applies to such transactions if they are secured by a
consumer's principal dwelling. Also, home equity lines of credit
subject to Sec. 226.5b are not covered by Sec. 226.19(a). For
guidance on the applicability of the Board's revisions to Sec.
226.19(a) published on July 30, 2008, see comment 1(d)(5)-1.[rsqbb]
2. Timing and use of estimates. [lsqbb]Truth in Lending
disclosures must be given[rsqbb][rtrif]The disclosures required by
Sec. 226.19(a)(1)(i) must be delivered or mailed[ltrif] [lsqbb](a)
before consummation or (b) within[rsqbb][rtrif]not later than[ltrif]
three business days after the creditor receives the consumer's
written application[lsqbb], whichever is earlier.[rsqbb] [rtrif]and
at least seven business days before consummation. The general
definition of ``business day'' in Sec. 226.2(a)(6)--a day on which
the creditor's offices are open to the public for substantially all
of its business functions--is used for purposes of Sec.
226.19(a)(1)(i). See comment 2(a)(6)-1. This general definition is
consistent with the definition of ``business day'' in HUD's
Regulation X--a day on which the creditor's offices are open to the
public for carrying on substantially all of its business functions.
See 24 CFR 6500.2. Accordingly, the[ltrif][lsqbb]The[rsqbb]
three[rtrif]-business-[ltrif]day period in Sec. 226.19(a)(1)(i) for
making early disclosures coincides with the time period within which
creditors subject to RESPA must provide good faith est