Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request, 75167-75168 [E8-29036]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 10, 2008 / Notices
seizure was in 2004. Mr. Ross believes
that he would achieve a level of safety
that is equivalent to the level of safety
obtained by complying with the
regulation because his seizure disorder
is well controlled with his current
medication. His doctor certified that
while on medication, he is medically fit
to drive.
Travis Williams
Mr. Williams is a CMV driver in the
state of Louisiana. He was diagnosed
with epilepsy in 1996 and is currently
taking anti-seizure medication
(Depakote). His neurologist certified that
his seizure disorder is well controlled.
Mr. Williams believes that he would
achieve a level of safety that is
equivalent to the level of safety obtained
by complying with the regulation
because he has remained seizure-free on
anti-seizure medication for 12 years.
John B. Yates
Mr. Yates is a CMV driver in the state
of West Virginia. He has a history of
seizures diagnosed in 1976. He is
currently on anti-seizure medication
(Depokota). According to his
neurologist, his last seizure was in 1982.
Mr. Yates believes that he would
achieve a level of safety that is
equivalent to the level of safety obtained
by complying with the regulation
because he has not had a seizure in 26
years while on medication.
Request for Comments
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315
and 31136(e), FMCSA requests public
comment from all interested persons on
the exemption application described in
this notice. We will consider all
comments received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated
earlier in the notice.
Issued on: December 3, 2008.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. E8–29188 Filed 12–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Proposed Agency Information
Collection Activities; Comment
Request
AGENCY: Federal Railroad
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Dec 09, 2008
Jkt 217001
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces that the Information
Collection Requirements (ICRs)
abstracted below have been forwarded
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and comment. Each
ICR describes the nature of the
information collection and its expected
burden. The Federal Register notice
with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments on the collection of
information listed below was published
on October 2, 2008 (See 73 FR 57404).
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before January 9, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Robert Brogan, Office of Planning and
Evaluation Division, RRS–21, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Ave., SE., Mail Stop 25,
Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202)
493–6292), or Ms. Nakia Jackson, Office
of Information Technology, RAD–20,
Federal Railroad Administration, 1200
New Jersey Ave., SE., Mail Stop 35,
Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202)
493–6073). (These telephone numbers
are not toll-free.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Public Law No. 104–13, § 2, 109
Stat. 163 (1995) (codified as revised at
44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), and its
implementing regulations, 5 CFR Part
1320, require Federal agencies to issue
two notices seeking public comment on
information collection activities before
OMB may approve paperwork packages.
44 U.S.C. 3506, 3507; 5 CFR 1320.5,
1320.8(d)(1), 1320.12. On October 2,
2008, FRA published a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register soliciting comment
on ICRs that the agency was seeking
OMB approval. 73 FR 57404. FRA
received one letter in response to this
notice.
The letter came from Mr. Freddie
Simpson, President of the Brotherhood
of Maintenance of Way Employes
Division (BMWED). The BMWED is a
labor organization representing
approximately 35,000 railroad workers
who build, maintain, inspect, and repair
railroad tracks, bridges, and related
railroad infrastructure throughout the
United States. In his comments, Mr.
Simpson noted the following:
BMWED is a charter member of the Rail
Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC) and a
voting member of the RSAC Railroad Bridge
Working Group (RBWG). The RBWG is
tasked by FRA to ‘‘report to the Federal
Railroad Administration on the current state
of Railroad bridge safety management,
updating the findings and conclusions of the
1993 Summary Report of the FRA Railroad
Bridge Safety Survey, including
recommendations for further action.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75167
BMWED believes the information
collection activities outlined in the OMB
Control Number 2130—New are necessary for
FRA and RBWG to properly execute its
functions. BMWED also believes the
information collection activities will have
practical utility in assessing the current state
of railroad bridge safety management and
that the anticipated surveys and evaluations
of selected railroad bridge management
programs is vital to such assessment. Finally,
BMWED believes FRA’s estimates of the
burden of such information collection
activities are reasonable, sound, and
minimally burdensome.
The information to be collected and
weighting factors to be applied
thereupon are presently being reviewed
by the American Short Line and
Regional Railroad Association
(ASLRRA) Bridge Committee. This
committee is composed of the chief
bridge engineers from the seven Class I
railroads and Amtrak, representatives of
Class II regional and Class III shot line
railroads, consulting engineers, and
industry suppliers. FRA will consider
the recommendations of the ASLRRA
Bridge Committee in this regard.
Before OMB decides whether to
approve this proposed collection of
information, it must provide 30 days for
public comment. 44 U.S.C. 3507(b); 5
CFR 1320.12(d). Federal law requires
OMB to approve or disapprove
paperwork packages between 30 and 60
days after the 30 day notice is
published. 44 U.S.C. 3507 (b)–(c); 5 CFR
1320.12(d); see also 60 FR 44978, 44983,
Aug. 29, 1995. OMB believes that the 30
day notice informs the regulated
community to file relevant comments
and affords the agency adequate time to
digest public comments before it
renders a decision. 60 FR 44983, Aug.
29, 1995. Therefore, respondents should
submit their respective comments to
OMB within 30 days of publication to
best ensure having their full effect. 5
CFR 1320.12(c); see also 60 FR 44983,
Aug. 29, 1995.
The summaries below describe the
nature of the information collection
requirements (ICRs) and the expected
burden. The proposed requirements are
being submitted for clearance by OMB
as required by the PRA.
Title: Factors for Selection of
Railroads for Evaluation of Bridge
Management Practices.
OMB Control Number: 2130—New.
Type of Request: Regular approval of
a proposed collection of information.
Affected Public: Railroads.
Form(s): FRA F 6180.129.
Abstract: The Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) has conducted a
Railroad Bridge Safety Program at
various levels of effort ever since the
enactment of the Railroad Safety Act of
E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM
10DEN1
75168
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 10, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
1970. FRA is authorized under that act
to issue regulations addressing a wide
variety of subjects regarding railroad
safety, but FRA has found that bridge
safety has been well served by a nonregulatory policy.
The resulting Statement of Agency
Policy on the Safety of Railroad Bridges,
published in the Federal Register in
2000, is based on the findings of a
survey conducted by FRA in 1992 and
1993. That survey showed that a large
majority of railroads were managing
their bridges in a manner which
promoted the immediate safety of those
bridges. FRA therefore adopted that
Bridge Safety Policy, which
incorporates non-regulatory guidelines.
The non-regulatory guidelines of the
Bridge Safety Policy are promulgated as
Appendix C of the Federal Track Safety
Standards, Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 213.
Since the initial bridge management
survey was completed, FRA has
continued to conduct evaluations of the
bridge management practices of the
Nation’s railroads. Regular, continuing
contact has been in place between FRA
and the larger railroads (Class I and
major passenger carriers). However, the
selection of smaller railroads (Class III
short lines and smaller Class II regional
railroads) has been on an ad hoc basis.
FRA has based decisions to evaluate
individual smaller railroads on
recommendations from FRA regional
staff, complaints from the public, and
the small number of bridge-related train
accidents.
The Government Accountability
Office (GAO) in 2006 and 2007
conducted a study to evaluate the safety
and serviceability of our Nation’s
railroad bridges and tunnels. GAO
reported to the Congress on that study
in August 2007. That report,
‘‘RAILROAD BRIDGES AND
TUNNELS—Federal Role in Providing
Safety Oversight and Freight
Infrastructure Investment Could Be
Better Targeted’’ includes the following
recommendation:
To enhance the effectiveness of its bridge
and tunnel safety oversight function, we
recommend that the Secretary of
Transportation direct the Administrator of
the Federal Railroad Administration to
devise a systematic, consistent, risk-based
methodology for selecting railroads for its
bridge safety surveys to ensure that it
includes railroads that are at higher risk of
not following the FRA’s bridge safety
guidelines and of having bridge and tunnel
safety issues.
FRA agrees with that recommendation,
and is implementing it.
A vital part of that methodology is the
development of information on which to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Dec 09, 2008
Jkt 217001
base the factors by which railroads will
be selected for surveys and evaluations.
The factors developed by FRA, in
conjunction with the railroads
themselves, include such statistics as
the length of a railroad in miles, the
number, types and total length of its
bridges, its level of traffic, the presence
of hazardous material traffic, the
operation of passenger trains, and the
railroad’s record of train accidents.
Several of those factors, particularly
regarding the railroad’s bridge
population, are not found in data
already held or collected by FRA.
An attempt to characterize the
selection factors without incorporating
that data on a railroad’s bridge
population would seriously compromise
the accuracy and usefulness of the
information. FRA has, therefore,
determined that the effectiveness of its
bridge safety program depends on this
data, and has identified two options for
collecting it. In one case, FRA
inspectors could visit each railroad in
turn, interview the managers of the
railroad, and record the information
presented. In the other case, FRA could
request that each railroad provide its
data to FRA in a convenient format.
FRA believes that the second option,
self-reporting by the railroads, is more
convenient for the responding universe,
and that it represents the most efficient
use of agency resources. Railroad
managers will be able to gather the data
on their own time schedules, within
reason, and FRA would not have to
devote employee time and travel
expenses to visit the responding
railroads.
FRA will use the data received in this
project to rank individual railroads for
scheduling bridge program evaluations
by FRA’s Bridge Safety Staff. The data
will be analyzed against weighting
factors, and railroads will be prioritized
according to the resulting scores. The
weighting factors are presently being
reviewed by a committee of the
American Short Line and Regional
Railroad Association (ASLRRA). FRA
will consider the recommendation of
ASLRRA in this regard, and will make
the weighting factors available to the
respondent universe and the public as
part of this project.
It should be noted that a high
selection ranking of any railroad by FRA
will not necessarily indicate that the
railroad has a bridge safety problem.
That determination, one way or the
other, will only be made by FRA during
its evaluation of that railroad’s bridge
management practices.
Annual Estimated Burden: 1,500
hours.
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Addressee: Send comments regarding
these information collections to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, 725 Seventeenth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503; Attention: FRA
Desk Officer. Comments may also be
sent via e-mail to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(OIRA) of the Office of Management and
Budget at the following address:
oira_submissions@omb.eop.gov.
Comments are invited on the
following: Whether the proposed
collections of information are necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of FRA, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
the accuracy of FRA’s estimates of the
burden of the proposed information
collections; ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collections of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
A comment to OMB is best assured of
having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520.
Issued in Washington, DC on December 3,
2008.
Martin J. Eble,
Acting Director, Office of Financial
Management, Federal Railroad
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–29036 Filed 12–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Proposed Agency Information
Collection Activities; Comment
Request
AGENCY: Federal Railroad
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces that the Information
Collection Requirements (ICRs)
abstracted below have been forwarded
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and comment. Each
ICR describes the nature of the
information collection and its expected
burden. The Federal Register notice
with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments on the collection of
information listed below was published
E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM
10DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75167-75168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-29036]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment
Request
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information
Collection Requirements (ICRs) abstracted below have been forwarded to
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. Each
ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its expected
burden. The Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment period
soliciting comments on the collection of information listed below was
published on October 2, 2008 (See 73 FR 57404).
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before January 9, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Brogan, Office of Planning
and Evaluation Division, RRS-21, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200
New Jersey Ave., SE., Mail Stop 25, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone:
(202) 493-6292), or Ms. Nakia Jackson, Office of Information
Technology, RAD-20, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Ave., SE., Mail Stop 35, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202) 493-
6073). (These telephone numbers are not toll-free.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA),
Public Law No. 104-13, Sec. 2, 109 Stat. 163 (1995) (codified as
revised at 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), and its implementing regulations, 5
CFR Part 1320, require Federal agencies to issue two notices seeking
public comment on information collection activities before OMB may
approve paperwork packages. 44 U.S.C. 3506, 3507; 5 CFR 1320.5,
1320.8(d)(1), 1320.12. On October 2, 2008, FRA published a 60-day
notice in the Federal Register soliciting comment on ICRs that the
agency was seeking OMB approval. 73 FR 57404. FRA received one letter
in response to this notice.
The letter came from Mr. Freddie Simpson, President of the
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division (BMWED). The BMWED
is a labor organization representing approximately 35,000 railroad
workers who build, maintain, inspect, and repair railroad tracks,
bridges, and related railroad infrastructure throughout the United
States. In his comments, Mr. Simpson noted the following:
BMWED is a charter member of the Rail Safety Advisory Committee
(RSAC) and a voting member of the RSAC Railroad Bridge Working Group
(RBWG). The RBWG is tasked by FRA to ``report to the Federal
Railroad Administration on the current state of Railroad bridge
safety management, updating the findings and conclusions of the 1993
Summary Report of the FRA Railroad Bridge Safety Survey, including
recommendations for further action.''
BMWED believes the information collection activities outlined in
the OMB Control Number 2130--New are necessary for FRA and RBWG to
properly execute its functions. BMWED also believes the information
collection activities will have practical utility in assessing the
current state of railroad bridge safety management and that the
anticipated surveys and evaluations of selected railroad bridge
management programs is vital to such assessment. Finally, BMWED
believes FRA's estimates of the burden of such information
collection activities are reasonable, sound, and minimally
burdensome.
The information to be collected and weighting factors to be applied
thereupon are presently being reviewed by the American Short Line and
Regional Railroad Association (ASLRRA) Bridge Committee. This committee
is composed of the chief bridge engineers from the seven Class I
railroads and Amtrak, representatives of Class II regional and Class
III shot line railroads, consulting engineers, and industry suppliers.
FRA will consider the recommendations of the ASLRRA Bridge Committee in
this regard.
Before OMB decides whether to approve this proposed collection of
information, it must provide 30 days for public comment. 44 U.S.C.
3507(b); 5 CFR 1320.12(d). Federal law requires OMB to approve or
disapprove paperwork packages between 30 and 60 days after the 30 day
notice is published. 44 U.S.C. 3507 (b)-(c); 5 CFR 1320.12(d); see also
60 FR 44978, 44983, Aug. 29, 1995. OMB believes that the 30 day notice
informs the regulated community to file relevant comments and affords
the agency adequate time to digest public comments before it renders a
decision. 60 FR 44983, Aug. 29, 1995. Therefore, respondents should
submit their respective comments to OMB within 30 days of publication
to best ensure having their full effect. 5 CFR 1320.12(c); see also 60
FR 44983, Aug. 29, 1995.
The summaries below describe the nature of the information
collection requirements (ICRs) and the expected burden. The proposed
requirements are being submitted for clearance by OMB as required by
the PRA.
Title: Factors for Selection of Railroads for Evaluation of Bridge
Management Practices.
OMB Control Number: 2130--New.
Type of Request: Regular approval of a proposed collection of
information.
Affected Public: Railroads.
Form(s): FRA F 6180.129.
Abstract: The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) has conducted a
Railroad Bridge Safety Program at various levels of effort ever since
the enactment of the Railroad Safety Act of
[[Page 75168]]
1970. FRA is authorized under that act to issue regulations addressing
a wide variety of subjects regarding railroad safety, but FRA has found
that bridge safety has been well served by a non-regulatory policy.
The resulting Statement of Agency Policy on the Safety of Railroad
Bridges, published in the Federal Register in 2000, is based on the
findings of a survey conducted by FRA in 1992 and 1993. That survey
showed that a large majority of railroads were managing their bridges
in a manner which promoted the immediate safety of those bridges. FRA
therefore adopted that Bridge Safety Policy, which incorporates non-
regulatory guidelines. The non-regulatory guidelines of the Bridge
Safety Policy are promulgated as Appendix C of the Federal Track Safety
Standards, Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 213.
Since the initial bridge management survey was completed, FRA has
continued to conduct evaluations of the bridge management practices of
the Nation's railroads. Regular, continuing contact has been in place
between FRA and the larger railroads (Class I and major passenger
carriers). However, the selection of smaller railroads (Class III short
lines and smaller Class II regional railroads) has been on an ad hoc
basis. FRA has based decisions to evaluate individual smaller railroads
on recommendations from FRA regional staff, complaints from the public,
and the small number of bridge-related train accidents.
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) in 2006 and 2007
conducted a study to evaluate the safety and serviceability of our
Nation's railroad bridges and tunnels. GAO reported to the Congress on
that study in August 2007. That report, ``RAILROAD BRIDGES AND
TUNNELS--Federal Role in Providing Safety Oversight and Freight
Infrastructure Investment Could Be Better Targeted'' includes the
following recommendation:
To enhance the effectiveness of its bridge and tunnel safety
oversight function, we recommend that the Secretary of
Transportation direct the Administrator of the Federal Railroad
Administration to devise a systematic, consistent, risk-based
methodology for selecting railroads for its bridge safety surveys to
ensure that it includes railroads that are at higher risk of not
following the FRA's bridge safety guidelines and of having bridge
and tunnel safety issues.
FRA agrees with that recommendation, and is implementing it.
A vital part of that methodology is the development of information
on which to base the factors by which railroads will be selected for
surveys and evaluations. The factors developed by FRA, in conjunction
with the railroads themselves, include such statistics as the length of
a railroad in miles, the number, types and total length of its bridges,
its level of traffic, the presence of hazardous material traffic, the
operation of passenger trains, and the railroad's record of train
accidents. Several of those factors, particularly regarding the
railroad's bridge population, are not found in data already held or
collected by FRA.
An attempt to characterize the selection factors without
incorporating that data on a railroad's bridge population would
seriously compromise the accuracy and usefulness of the information.
FRA has, therefore, determined that the effectiveness of its bridge
safety program depends on this data, and has identified two options for
collecting it. In one case, FRA inspectors could visit each railroad in
turn, interview the managers of the railroad, and record the
information presented. In the other case, FRA could request that each
railroad provide its data to FRA in a convenient format.
FRA believes that the second option, self-reporting by the
railroads, is more convenient for the responding universe, and that it
represents the most efficient use of agency resources. Railroad
managers will be able to gather the data on their own time schedules,
within reason, and FRA would not have to devote employee time and
travel expenses to visit the responding railroads.
FRA will use the data received in this project to rank individual
railroads for scheduling bridge program evaluations by FRA's Bridge
Safety Staff. The data will be analyzed against weighting factors, and
railroads will be prioritized according to the resulting scores. The
weighting factors are presently being reviewed by a committee of the
American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association (ASLRRA). FRA
will consider the recommendation of ASLRRA in this regard, and will
make the weighting factors available to the respondent universe and the
public as part of this project.
It should be noted that a high selection ranking of any railroad by
FRA will not necessarily indicate that the railroad has a bridge safety
problem. That determination, one way or the other, will only be made by
FRA during its evaluation of that railroad's bridge management
practices.
Annual Estimated Burden: 1,500 hours.
Addressee: Send comments regarding these information collections to
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget, 725 Seventeenth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503;
Attention: FRA Desk Officer. Comments may also be sent via e-mail to
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the Office
of Management and Budget at the following address: oira_
submissions@omb.eop.gov.
Comments are invited on the following: Whether the proposed
collections of information are necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of FRA, including whether the information will have
practical utility; the accuracy of FRA's estimates of the burden of the
proposed information collections; ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the collections of information on respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
A comment to OMB is best assured of having its full effect if OMB
receives it within 30 days of publication of this notice in the Federal
Register.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.
Issued in Washington, DC on December 3, 2008.
Martin J. Eble,
Acting Director, Office of Financial Management, Federal Railroad
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-29036 Filed 12-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P