Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 74713-74714 [E8-29086]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 9, 2008 / Notices
• Develop teaming opportunities with
universities and industry to invest in
geothermal education programs.
• Co-sponsor student design
competitions with industry focused on
critical technology challenges for EGS.
Potential initiatives may include, but
are not limited to:
• EGS curriculum—Competitively
fund institutions of higher education to
develop geothermal educational
curricula and degree programs/minors/
specializations.
• Educational scholarship program—
Support student enrollment in programs
with geothermal development and
curricula for education, research and/or
internships. These programs may apply
to undergraduates, graduate students,
and post-docs.
• Vocational training—Develop the
next generation of skilled workers for
widespread geothermal facility
construction and operation.
• University cooperative education
and professional internship program.
• University student competition.
• Allow students to solve real-life
problems and implement solutions in
the field.
• Co-sponsor with industry student
design competitions focused on critical
technology challenges.
• Co-sponsor student paper
challenges to showcase student research
in a public forum and make connections
to industry.
• K–12 education modules—Provide
early exposure to and curricula for
geothermal energy and technology. This
may include supplementing the Energy
Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE)
Education Web site.
• Pilot education program.
• Day programs/workshops at
universities.
• Innovative education models for
post-undergraduate education.
Issued in Golden, CO on November 26,
2008.
James P. Damm,
Acting Assistant Manager, Office of
Acquisition and Financial Assistance, Golden
Field Office, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. E8–29087 Filed 12–8–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Energy Information Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Energy Information
Administration (EIA), Department of
Energy (DOE).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:00 Dec 08, 2008
Jkt 217001
ACTION: Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection Update;
Informational.
SUMMARY: The EIA issued a Proposed
Collection Comment Request on ‘‘Report
of Refinery Outages,’’ 73 FR 10745,
Thursday, February 28, 2008. EIA is
postponing a decision on pursuing this
survey until spring 2009. This notice is
an informational update on the reason
for EIA’s postponement of decision and
EIA’s activities in this area.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joanne Shore by e-mail at
joanne.shore@eia.doe.gov or by
telephone at 202–586–4677.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
EIA recognizes the importance of
understanding and anticipating supply
changes that could add to already high
prices being paid by consumers for
petroleum products. Refinery
availability is an important element of
this issue, and was highlighted in
Section 804 of the Energy Independence
and Security Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110–
140), requiring EIA to assess the impact
of planned outages using commercially
available data. Before EIA could
implement Section 804, Congressional
interest increased in having EIA collect
such data, partially as a result of
unusually high refinery outages in 2007.
In response, EIA put out a Federal
Register notice on February 2008
(Proposed Collection Comment Request
on ‘‘Report of Refinery Outages,’’ 73 FR
10745, Thursday, February 28, 2008) to
solicit comments on collecting such
data. The EIA data collection would be
an enhancement to the monthly refinery
survey (Form EIA–810). In addition, the
Department of Energy’s Office of
Electricity Delivery and Energy
Reliability (OE) put out a Federal
Register notice in July 2008 (Notice and
Request for Comments on Proposal for
a Refinery Disruption and Incident
Report, 73–FR 37451, July 1, 2008,
https://www.oe.netl.doe.gov/docs/
FRN_RefDisrupt070108.pdf) to collect
complementary after-the-fact outage
information on a short-term, real-time
basis in order to monitor ongoing issues
as part of its role in monitoring potential
supply emergencies. A second Federal
Register notice on this proposed
emergency report was published on
November 5, 2008, taking into
consideration comments received after
the first notice. Public comments are
being solicited through December 5,
2008, on the proposed emergency form
and instructions (Proposed Agency
Information Collection, 73–FR 65841,
November 5, 2008, https://
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74713
www.oe.netl.doe.gov/docs/
FRN_RefDisrupt110508.pdf). EIA’s data
collection on planned outages would
necessarily be prospective, but any
historical outage information in an EIA
survey would ultimately reflect those
reported in the proposed DOE Refinery
Emergency Disruption and Incident
Report.
Prior to the February 2008 EIA
Federal Register Notice, EIA had looked
at potentially collecting outage data or
alternatively using commercial data.
EIA’s review of commercial outage data
indicated that such data is relatively
comprehensive. It captures most
significant outages; contains unit-byunit outages for individual refineries
(thereby serving many State-specific
informational needs as well as Federal
needs for estimating supply impacts);
and may be able to be shared in a
useable form with State energy officials
more economically than a government
survey. However, the commercial data
does not contain production impacts.
A government data collection would
more likely capture all refinery outage
plans, but differences from commercial
data may be small. Governmentcollected data could potentially have
greater credibility and could add
information on potential impacts on
product output. However, government
collection would cost the Federal
government more than using
commercial data and would take several
years of data to accumulate adequate
history to be useful.
In addition to cost considerations,
data quality differences between
commercial data and an EIA collection
must be considered. EIA does not
currently collect planned refinery unit
outages. Rather, outages are reflected
retrospectively in EIA’s historical inputs
to major refinery units, although there is
no distinction between planned and
unplanned outages, or between outages
as a whole and economically-driven
utilization decisions in the refinery
input data. However, commercial data is
available that reflects planned unit
outages, as well as unplanned and
planned historical outages.
Reporting planning information is not
the same as reporting historical data.
While an EIA data collection could be
somewhat more accurate than a
commercial data source, EIA’s
experience with collecting ‘‘planned’’
activities is that such data inherently
have an element of uncertainty because
plans shift and actual maintenance may
take more or less time than planned.
Commercial data does not contain
impacts of outages on production,
although some private firms estimate
aggregate impacts from outages. EIA
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
74714
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 9, 2008 / Notices
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
already collects data on historical inputs
to major refinery processing units. As
outages occur, unit inputs decline. EIA
has used these data to estimate outage
impacts on production. If EIA were to
collect refinery estimates of planned
unit outage impacts on production,
results still would be uncertain, would
involve different methods of estimation
by different refiners, and would only
provide an indicator of supply changes.
Having EIA specify estimation methods
for determining planned outage impacts
on production would not necessarily
improve the accuracy, as different
methods may be appropriate for
different refinery situations. Whether
using commercial data or governmentcollected data, EIA will have to do
extensive analyses to make a supplyadequacy determination. That is, one
data option will not provide savings in
analytical effort over the other option.
The responses to the EIA Federal
Register notice did not shed further
light on EIA’s earlier assessment. The
comments opposing government data
collection questioned the usefulness of
the data in affecting the market,
difficulties in obtaining consistent
information, and the large burden
needed to respond. Comments
supporting the collection felt the
information would be helpful in
preparing States or regions for potential
supply problems and noted commercial
data is not readily available to States or
the public. Comments on both sides
noted that if a survey is proposed, more
clarification on information to be
collected is needed.
II. Current Actions
EIA could not begin a refinery outage
data collection before 2010. The
approval process and time needed for
both industry and the government to
make appropriate systems changes
preclude a 2009 collection.
Furthermore, EIA’s resources are fully
engaged in changing forms to meet
EPACT 2005 requirements and other
changes.
The retrospective real-time survey of
refinery outages, first proposed by DOE
in its July Federal Register notice, could
meet some of the needs listed in the
comments made by the National
Association of State Energy Officials
(NASEO) in response to EIA’s comment
request. However, the revised form in
DOE’s subsequent (November) Federal
Register notice no longer seeks to
collect information on actions taken,
units or processes affected, and
estimated production impacts. Also,
NASEO was not familiar with the extent
of commercially available data. It may
be more cost-effective for the Federal
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:00 Dec 08, 2008
Jkt 217001
government to pay for State access to
commercial information than to collect
it itself.
Since EIA is moving ahead to produce
reports on planned outages using
commercial data, and since it is not
possible to begin a new collection
immediately, EIA proposes to postpone
a decision on this data collection until
spring 2009. This will allow some
additional time to assess the adequacy
of the commercial data and EIA’s
analysis using that data to meet State
and Congressional concerns. It also will
provide the time for DOE to finalize its
emergency report survey, providing EIA
with the information to determine
which State and Congressional concerns
the DOE survey may ultimately address.
Last, a spring decision date will give
EIA more time to revisit potential
government survey costs and industry
burden associated with a government
collection. In the interim, EIA will work
with the Congress and the States (the
latter through the NASEO) to determine
if existing information and associated
analyses can be used to meet their
needs.
Should the EIA determine a survey is
necessary, a Federal Register notice will
be issued with the proposed survey
form and another opportunity for
comments will be provided. A survey
proposal would fall under the Federal
Energy Administration Act of 1974
(Pub. L. 93–275, 15 U.S.C. 761 et seq.)
and the DOE Organization Act (Pub. L.
95–91, 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.), which
require the EIA to carry out a
centralized, comprehensive, and unified
energy information program. This
program collects, evaluates, assembles,
analyzes, and disseminates information
on energy resource reserves, production,
demand, technology, and related
economic and statistical information.
This information is used to assess the
adequacy of energy resources to meet
near- and longer-term domestic
demands.
The EIA, as part of its effort to comply
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35), provides the general public and
other Federal agencies with
opportunities to comment on collections
of energy information conducted by or
in conjunction with the EIA. Any
comments received following a survey
proposal help the EIA prepare data
requests that maximize the utility of the
information collected, and to assess the
impact of collection requirements on the
public. Also, the EIA would later seek
approval for this collection by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
under Section 3507(a) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Issued in Washington, DC, December 2,
2008.
Patricia Breed,
Executive Assistant, Energy Information
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–29086 Filed 12–8–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OW–2008–0437; FRL–8749–3]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment
Request; Public Water System
Supervision Program (Renewal); EPA
ICR No. 0270.43, OMB Control No.
2040–0090
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document
announces that an Information
Collection Request (ICR) has been
forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval. This is a request to renew an
existing approved collection. The ICR,
which is abstracted below, describes the
nature of the information collection and
its estimated burden and cost.
DATES: Additional comments may be
submitted on or before January 8, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
referencing Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OW–2008–0437 to (1) EPA online using
www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method), by e-mail to OWDocket@epa.gov, or by mail to: EPA
Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Water Docket, MC:
28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB by
mail to: Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB),
Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725
17th Street, NW., Washington, DC
20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Naylor, Drinking Water
Protection Division, Office of Ground
Water and Drinking Water, (4606M),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number:
202.564.3847; fax number:
202.564.3755; e-mail address:
naylor.richard@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has
submitted the following ICR to OMB for
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74713-74714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-29086]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Energy Information Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Energy Information Administration (EIA), Department of Energy
(DOE).
ACTION: Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection
Update; Informational.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EIA issued a Proposed Collection Comment Request on
``Report of Refinery Outages,'' 73 FR 10745, Thursday, February 28,
2008. EIA is postponing a decision on pursuing this survey until spring
2009. This notice is an informational update on the reason for EIA's
postponement of decision and EIA's activities in this area.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joanne Shore by e-mail at
joanne.shore@eia.doe.gov or by telephone at 202-586-4677.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
EIA recognizes the importance of understanding and anticipating
supply changes that could add to already high prices being paid by
consumers for petroleum products. Refinery availability is an important
element of this issue, and was highlighted in Section 804 of the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-140), requiring EIA
to assess the impact of planned outages using commercially available
data. Before EIA could implement Section 804, Congressional interest
increased in having EIA collect such data, partially as a result of
unusually high refinery outages in 2007. In response, EIA put out a
Federal Register notice on February 2008 (Proposed Collection Comment
Request on ``Report of Refinery Outages,'' 73 FR 10745, Thursday,
February 28, 2008) to solicit comments on collecting such data. The EIA
data collection would be an enhancement to the monthly refinery survey
(Form EIA-810). In addition, the Department of Energy's Office of
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) put out a Federal
Register notice in July 2008 (Notice and Request for Comments on
Proposal for a Refinery Disruption and Incident Report, 73-FR 37451,
July 1, 2008, https://www.oe.netl.doe.gov/docs/FRN_
RefDisrupt070108.pdf) to collect complementary after-the-fact outage
information on a short-term, real-time basis in order to monitor
ongoing issues as part of its role in monitoring potential supply
emergencies. A second Federal Register notice on this proposed
emergency report was published on November 5, 2008, taking into
consideration comments received after the first notice. Public comments
are being solicited through December 5, 2008, on the proposed emergency
form and instructions (Proposed Agency Information Collection, 73-FR
65841, November 5, 2008, https://www.oe.netl.doe.gov/docs/FRN_
RefDisrupt110508.pdf). EIA's data collection on planned outages would
necessarily be prospective, but any historical outage information in an
EIA survey would ultimately reflect those reported in the proposed DOE
Refinery Emergency Disruption and Incident Report.
Prior to the February 2008 EIA Federal Register Notice, EIA had
looked at potentially collecting outage data or alternatively using
commercial data. EIA's review of commercial outage data indicated that
such data is relatively comprehensive. It captures most significant
outages; contains unit-by-unit outages for individual refineries
(thereby serving many State-specific informational needs as well as
Federal needs for estimating supply impacts); and may be able to be
shared in a useable form with State energy officials more economically
than a government survey. However, the commercial data does not contain
production impacts.
A government data collection would more likely capture all refinery
outage plans, but differences from commercial data may be small.
Government-collected data could potentially have greater credibility
and could add information on potential impacts on product output.
However, government collection would cost the Federal government more
than using commercial data and would take several years of data to
accumulate adequate history to be useful.
In addition to cost considerations, data quality differences
between commercial data and an EIA collection must be considered. EIA
does not currently collect planned refinery unit outages. Rather,
outages are reflected retrospectively in EIA's historical inputs to
major refinery units, although there is no distinction between planned
and unplanned outages, or between outages as a whole and economically-
driven utilization decisions in the refinery input data. However,
commercial data is available that reflects planned unit outages, as
well as unplanned and planned historical outages.
Reporting planning information is not the same as reporting
historical data. While an EIA data collection could be somewhat more
accurate than a commercial data source, EIA's experience with
collecting ``planned'' activities is that such data inherently have an
element of uncertainty because plans shift and actual maintenance may
take more or less time than planned.
Commercial data does not contain impacts of outages on production,
although some private firms estimate aggregate impacts from outages.
EIA
[[Page 74714]]
already collects data on historical inputs to major refinery processing
units. As outages occur, unit inputs decline. EIA has used these data
to estimate outage impacts on production. If EIA were to collect
refinery estimates of planned unit outage impacts on production,
results still would be uncertain, would involve different methods of
estimation by different refiners, and would only provide an indicator
of supply changes. Having EIA specify estimation methods for
determining planned outage impacts on production would not necessarily
improve the accuracy, as different methods may be appropriate for
different refinery situations. Whether using commercial data or
government-collected data, EIA will have to do extensive analyses to
make a supply-adequacy determination. That is, one data option will not
provide savings in analytical effort over the other option.
The responses to the EIA Federal Register notice did not shed
further light on EIA's earlier assessment. The comments opposing
government data collection questioned the usefulness of the data in
affecting the market, difficulties in obtaining consistent information,
and the large burden needed to respond. Comments supporting the
collection felt the information would be helpful in preparing States or
regions for potential supply problems and noted commercial data is not
readily available to States or the public. Comments on both sides noted
that if a survey is proposed, more clarification on information to be
collected is needed.
II. Current Actions
EIA could not begin a refinery outage data collection before 2010.
The approval process and time needed for both industry and the
government to make appropriate systems changes preclude a 2009
collection. Furthermore, EIA's resources are fully engaged in changing
forms to meet EPACT 2005 requirements and other changes.
The retrospective real-time survey of refinery outages, first
proposed by DOE in its July Federal Register notice, could meet some of
the needs listed in the comments made by the National Association of
State Energy Officials (NASEO) in response to EIA's comment request.
However, the revised form in DOE's subsequent (November) Federal
Register notice no longer seeks to collect information on actions
taken, units or processes affected, and estimated production impacts.
Also, NASEO was not familiar with the extent of commercially available
data. It may be more cost-effective for the Federal government to pay
for State access to commercial information than to collect it itself.
Since EIA is moving ahead to produce reports on planned outages
using commercial data, and since it is not possible to begin a new
collection immediately, EIA proposes to postpone a decision on this
data collection until spring 2009. This will allow some additional time
to assess the adequacy of the commercial data and EIA's analysis using
that data to meet State and Congressional concerns. It also will
provide the time for DOE to finalize its emergency report survey,
providing EIA with the information to determine which State and
Congressional concerns the DOE survey may ultimately address. Last, a
spring decision date will give EIA more time to revisit potential
government survey costs and industry burden associated with a
government collection. In the interim, EIA will work with the Congress
and the States (the latter through the NASEO) to determine if existing
information and associated analyses can be used to meet their needs.
Should the EIA determine a survey is necessary, a Federal Register
notice will be issued with the proposed survey form and another
opportunity for comments will be provided. A survey proposal would fall
under the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-275, 15
U.S.C. 761 et seq.) and the DOE Organization Act (Pub. L. 95-91, 42
U.S.C. 7101 et seq.), which require the EIA to carry out a centralized,
comprehensive, and unified energy information program. This program
collects, evaluates, assembles, analyzes, and disseminates information
on energy resource reserves, production, demand, technology, and
related economic and statistical information. This information is used
to assess the adequacy of energy resources to meet near- and longer-
term domestic demands.
The EIA, as part of its effort to comply with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), provides
the general public and other Federal agencies with opportunities to
comment on collections of energy information conducted by or in
conjunction with the EIA. Any comments received following a survey
proposal help the EIA prepare data requests that maximize the utility
of the information collected, and to assess the impact of collection
requirements on the public. Also, the EIA would later seek approval for
this collection by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
Section 3507(a) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Issued in Washington, DC, December 2, 2008.
Patricia Breed,
Executive Assistant, Energy Information Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-29086 Filed 12-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P