Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision, 74562-74563 [E8-28942]
Download as PDF
74562
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 236 / Monday, December 8, 2008 / Notices
OMB Control Number: 2126–0003.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently-approved information
collection.
Respondents: Motor carriers and
commercial motor vehicle drivers.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
732,038.
Estimated Time per Response: Varies
according to the requirements for
specific records.
Expiration Date: April 30, 2009.
Frequency of Response: Varies
according to requirements for specific
records.
Estimated Total Annual Burden:
66,267,505 hours [3,991,851 hours for
inspection, repair, and maintenance +
59,094,379 hours for driver inspection +
590,933 hours for certification of
corrective action + 2,265,280 hours for
review of driver inspection reports +
251,629 hours for disposition of
roadside inspection reports + 34,798
hours for periodic inspections + 18,301
hours for records of inspector
qualifications + 20,334 hours for records
of brake inspector qualifications =
66,267,505].
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspect of this
information collection, including: (1)
Whether the proposed collection is
necessary for the performance of
FMCSA’s functions; (2) the accuracy of
the estimated burden; (3) ways for the
FMCSA to enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the collected
information; and (4) ways that the
burden could be minimized without
reducing the quality of the collected
information. The agency will summarize
or include your comments in the request
for OMB’s clearance of this information
collection.
Issued on: December 2, 2008.
Terry Shelton,
Associate Administrator for Research and
Information Technology.
[FR Doc. E8–28945 Filed 12–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Applications; Vision
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of denials.
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its denial
of 112 applications from individuals
who requested an exemption from the
Federal vision standard applicable to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:32 Dec 05, 2008
Jkt 217001
interstate truck and bus drivers and the
reasons for the denials. FMCSA has
statutory authority to exempt
individuals from the vision requirement
if the exemptions granted will not
compromise safety. The Agency has
concluded that granting these
exemptions does not provide a level of
safety that will be equivalent to, or
greater than, the level of safety
maintained without the exemptions for
these commercial motor vehicle (CMV)
drivers.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Mary D. Gunnels, Director Medical
Programs, 202–366–4001, U.S.
Department of Transportation, FMCSA,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room
W64–224, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption from
the Federal vision standard for a
renewable two-year period if it finds
‘‘such an exemption would likely
achieve a level of safety that is
equivalent to, or greater than, the level
that would be achieved absent such an
exemption.’’ The procedures for
requesting an exemption are set out in
49 CFR part 381.
Accordingly, FMCSA evaluated 112
individual exemption requests on their
merits and made a determination that
these applicants do not satisfy the
criteria eligibility or meet the terms and
conditions of the Federal exemption
program. Each applicant has, prior to
this notice, received a letter of final
disposition on his/her exemption
request. Those decision letters fully
outlined the basis for the denial and
constitute final Agency action. The list
published today summarizes the
Agency’s recent denials as required
under 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(4) by
periodically publishing names and
reasons for denials.
The following 13 applicants lacked
sufficient driving experience during the
three-year period prior to the date of
their application:
Cehic, Muhamed
Emerson, Mark S.
Englis, James C.
Evans, Ronald P.
Fiddler, Eddie W.
Mears, Allan
Moon, Robert F.
Odom, Roy
Rugg, Thomas I.
Seyfried, Jr., William J.
Smith, Jr., Fornum J.
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Sooy, Donna A.
Vanlier, James A.
The following 12 applicants did not
have any experience operating a CMV.
Bomholt, Scott P.
Bradshaw, Owen D.
Fanton, Arthur
Garcia, Adrian
Kayvani, Ali A.
McEntee, Robert O.
Phinney, Michael S.
Romo, Manuel
Shoebridge, Nicholas R.
Solis, Rafael P.
Watson, Jeffrey K.
Youngblood, Justin P.
The following 19 applicants did not
have 3 years of experience driving a
CMV on public highways with the
vision deficiency.
Bennett, Gerlad W.
Buderus, Dusty L.
Doolin, Roger B.
Frasier, Jason A.
Garcia, Francisco J.
Irving, Johnny L.
Jamal, Azizi A.
Kalenbaugh, Matthew C.
Klaska, Andrew C.
Larrow, Todd P.
Lawhorn, Larry D.
Long, Tina Y.
Luterbach, Douglas D.
Miller, James C.
Morales, David O.
Phillips, William E.
Richards, Jr., Joel
Rusin, Adam A.
Wilson, Jr., Thomas C.
The following 7 applicants did not
have 3 years of recent experience
driving a CMV with the vision
deficiency.
Coffield, James J.
Czyz, Jean E.
Karow, Kevin G.
Klatt, Michael A.
Mieszala, Mark D.
Pena, Gonzalo
Snyder, Jr., Raymond L.
The following 21 applicants did not
have sufficient driving experience over
the past 3 years under normal highway
operating conditions.
Bothwell, Robert L.
Covert, LyDale M.
Dosher, Jacob F.
Dugger, William W.
Greene, James P.
Gunn, Aubrey D.
Haman, Darin E.
Hillsman, Archie C.
Jackson, Donald E.
Lachney, Shelton R.
Marks, Michael D.
Martell, Yandy H.
Mast, Jennifer E.
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 236 / Monday, December 8, 2008 / Notices
Mathews, Keith D.
Motes, Marvin L.
Perrotta, Andrew C.
Picray, Jerald A.
Powell, James R.
Robertson, Kyle E.
Terry, Charles A.
White, Keith J.
The following 6 applicants had
commercial driver’s license suspensions
during the three-year review period in
relation to a moving violation.
Applicants do not qualify for an
exemption with a suspension during the
three-year period.
Baillargeon, David L.
Nieves, Julio
Pete, Freddy H.
Shoemaker, Stephen K.
Taflinger, Sr., James B.
Torzon, Martin R.
One applicant, Gary E. Lathrop, did
not have verifiable proof of commercial
driving experience over the past 3 years
under normal highway operating
conditions that would serve as an
adequate predictor of future safe
performance.
One applicant, Randy A. Miller, did
not demonstrate the level of safety
required for interstate driving.
The following 5 applicants did not
hold a license which allowed operation
of vehicles over 10,000 pounds for all or
part of the three-year period.
Bowman, Bruce E.
Boyce, Lennie J.
Gaines, Wilfred M.
Schmidt, Ronald D.
Steed, Marion D.
The following 9 applicants were
denied for miscellaneous/multiple
reasons.
Branham, Danny C.
Dinan, Patrick D.
Ellis, James
Holiday, Ryan L.
Hollister, Kevin B.
Norland, Anthony P.
Wellman, Carl F.
Westerbeck, Randolph A.
Whitehouse, Jayson M.
Two applicants, James O. Cook and
Mark R. Kiser, were disqualified
because their vision was not stable for
the entire three-year review period.
One applicant, Mark G. Hurley, was a
Canadian applicant.
Finally, the following 15 applicants
met the current federal vision standards.
Exemptions are not required for
applicants that meet the current
regulations for vision.
Adamire, Sr., Charles W.
Alvarez, Oscar O.
Blair, George E.
Denman, Irvin L.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:32 Dec 05, 2008
Jkt 217001
Devine, David S.
Doucette, Joshua P.
Elbon, Richard L.
Guerrero, Alfonso
Jenkins, Jeannette D.
Kraft, Michael A.
Pruett, Jeffrey W.
Rose, Darryl W.
Thatcher, Dick J.
Thomas, Raymond L.
Watson, Norman J.
Issued on: November 28, 2008.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. E8–28942 Filed 12–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2008–0292]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Applications; Vision
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its
decision to exempt 22 individuals from
the vision requirement in the Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
(FMCSRs). The exemptions will enable
these individuals to operate commercial
motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate
commerce without meeting the
prescribed vision standard. The Agency
has concluded that granting these
exemptions will provide a level of safety
that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
level of safety maintained without the
exemptions for these CMV drivers.
DATES: The exemptions are effective
December 8, 2008. The exemptions
expire on December 8, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical
Programs, (202)–366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64–
224, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online
through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at https://
www.regulations.gov
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74563
comments, go to https://
www.regulations.gov at any time or
Room W12–140 on the ground level of
the West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The
FDMS is available 24 hours each day,
365 days each year. If you want
acknowledgment that we received your
comments, please include a selfaddressed, stamped envelope or
postcard or print the acknowledgement
page that appears after submitting
comments on-line.
Privacy Act: Anyone may search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or of the person signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review the DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19476). This information is also
available at https://Docketsinfo.dot.gov.
Background
On October 17, 2008, FMCSA
published a notice of receipt of
exemption applications from certain
individuals, and requested comments
from the public (73 FR 61922). That
notice listed 22 applicants’ case
histories. The 22 individuals applied for
exemptions from the vision requirement
in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), for drivers who
operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2year period if it finds ‘‘such exemption
would likely achieve a level of safety
that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
level that would be achieved absent
such exemption.’’ The statute also
allows the Agency to renew exemptions
at the end of the 2-year period.
Accordingly, FMCSA has evaluated the
22 applications on their merits and
made a determination to grant
exemptions to all of them. The comment
period closed on November 17, 2008.
Vision and Driving Experience of the
Applicants
The vision requirement in the
FMCSRs provides:
A person is physically qualified to
drive a commercial motor vehicle if that
person has distant visual acuity of at
least 20/40 (Snellen) in each eye
without corrective lenses or visual
acuity separately corrected to 20/40
(Snellen) or better with corrective
lenses, distant binocular acuity of a least
20/40 (Snellen) in both eyes with or
without corrective lenses, field of vision
of at least 70 in the horizontal meridian
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 236 (Monday, December 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74562-74563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-28942]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of denials.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its denial of 112 applications from
individuals who requested an exemption from the Federal vision standard
applicable to interstate truck and bus drivers and the reasons for the
denials. FMCSA has statutory authority to exempt individuals from the
vision requirement if the exemptions granted will not compromise
safety. The Agency has concluded that granting these exemptions does
not provide a level of safety that will be equivalent to, or greater
than, the level of safety maintained without the exemptions for these
commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Mary D. Gunnels, Director Medical
Programs, 202-366-4001, U.S. Department of Transportation, FMCSA, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64-224, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office
hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
from the Federal vision standard for a renewable two-year period if it
finds ``such an exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that
is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved
absent such an exemption.'' The procedures for requesting an exemption
are set out in 49 CFR part 381.
Accordingly, FMCSA evaluated 112 individual exemption requests on
their merits and made a determination that these applicants do not
satisfy the criteria eligibility or meet the terms and conditions of
the Federal exemption program. Each applicant has, prior to this
notice, received a letter of final disposition on his/her exemption
request. Those decision letters fully outlined the basis for the denial
and constitute final Agency action. The list published today summarizes
the Agency's recent denials as required under 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(4) by
periodically publishing names and reasons for denials.
The following 13 applicants lacked sufficient driving experience
during the three-year period prior to the date of their application:
Cehic, Muhamed
Emerson, Mark S.
Englis, James C.
Evans, Ronald P.
Fiddler, Eddie W.
Mears, Allan
Moon, Robert F.
Odom, Roy
Rugg, Thomas I.
Seyfried, Jr., William J.
Smith, Jr., Fornum J.
Sooy, Donna A.
Vanlier, James A.
The following 12 applicants did not have any experience operating a
CMV.
Bomholt, Scott P.
Bradshaw, Owen D.
Fanton, Arthur
Garcia, Adrian
Kayvani, Ali A.
McEntee, Robert O.
Phinney, Michael S.
Romo, Manuel
Shoebridge, Nicholas R.
Solis, Rafael P.
Watson, Jeffrey K.
Youngblood, Justin P.
The following 19 applicants did not have 3 years of experience
driving a CMV on public highways with the vision deficiency.
Bennett, Gerlad W.
Buderus, Dusty L.
Doolin, Roger B.
Frasier, Jason A.
Garcia, Francisco J.
Irving, Johnny L.
Jamal, Azizi A.
Kalenbaugh, Matthew C.
Klaska, Andrew C.
Larrow, Todd P.
Lawhorn, Larry D.
Long, Tina Y.
Luterbach, Douglas D.
Miller, James C.
Morales, David O.
Phillips, William E.
Richards, Jr., Joel
Rusin, Adam A.
Wilson, Jr., Thomas C.
The following 7 applicants did not have 3 years of recent
experience driving a CMV with the vision deficiency.
Coffield, James J.
Czyz, Jean E.
Karow, Kevin G.
Klatt, Michael A.
Mieszala, Mark D.
Pena, Gonzalo
Snyder, Jr., Raymond L.
The following 21 applicants did not have sufficient driving
experience over the past 3 years under normal highway operating
conditions.
Bothwell, Robert L.
Covert, LyDale M.
Dosher, Jacob F.
Dugger, William W.
Greene, James P.
Gunn, Aubrey D.
Haman, Darin E.
Hillsman, Archie C.
Jackson, Donald E.
Lachney, Shelton R.
Marks, Michael D.
Martell, Yandy H.
Mast, Jennifer E.
[[Page 74563]]
Mathews, Keith D.
Motes, Marvin L.
Perrotta, Andrew C.
Picray, Jerald A.
Powell, James R.
Robertson, Kyle E.
Terry, Charles A.
White, Keith J.
The following 6 applicants had commercial driver's license
suspensions during the three-year review period in relation to a moving
violation. Applicants do not qualify for an exemption with a suspension
during the three-year period.
Baillargeon, David L.
Nieves, Julio
Pete, Freddy H.
Shoemaker, Stephen K.
Taflinger, Sr., James B.
Torzon, Martin R.
One applicant, Gary E. Lathrop, did not have verifiable proof of
commercial driving experience over the past 3 years under normal
highway operating conditions that would serve as an adequate predictor
of future safe performance.
One applicant, Randy A. Miller, did not demonstrate the level of
safety required for interstate driving.
The following 5 applicants did not hold a license which allowed
operation of vehicles over 10,000 pounds for all or part of the three-
year period.
Bowman, Bruce E.
Boyce, Lennie J.
Gaines, Wilfred M.
Schmidt, Ronald D.
Steed, Marion D.
The following 9 applicants were denied for miscellaneous/multiple
reasons.
Branham, Danny C.
Dinan, Patrick D.
Ellis, James
Holiday, Ryan L.
Hollister, Kevin B.
Norland, Anthony P.
Wellman, Carl F.
Westerbeck, Randolph A.
Whitehouse, Jayson M.
Two applicants, James O. Cook and Mark R. Kiser, were disqualified
because their vision was not stable for the entire three-year review
period.
One applicant, Mark G. Hurley, was a Canadian applicant.
Finally, the following 15 applicants met the current federal vision
standards. Exemptions are not required for applicants that meet the
current regulations for vision.
Adamire, Sr., Charles W.
Alvarez, Oscar O.
Blair, George E.
Denman, Irvin L.
Devine, David S.
Doucette, Joshua P.
Elbon, Richard L.
Guerrero, Alfonso
Jenkins, Jeannette D.
Kraft, Michael A.
Pruett, Jeffrey W.
Rose, Darryl W.
Thatcher, Dick J.
Thomas, Raymond L.
Watson, Norman J.
Issued on: November 28, 2008.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E8-28942 Filed 12-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P